——- OPERATION ‘X’——-

HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER 

INTRODUCING A CRIMINAL IN A ROBE

We are back! Unfortunately, cowards and paedophile protectors took our previous website down to protect the criminals that are operating in our judicial offices. Judge Simon Oliver attempted to silence all of the victims by falsifying court orders and court documents as well as bullying and harassing web hosters. It has not worked and we are now back. Louisa Lloyd-Jones from the Government Legal Department and Ben Silverstone from Matrix chambers have been lying and forging documents to take down websites that correctly reports the truth. This form of bullying and harassment might work with web hosters but it will not work with us. We will take our site (and public comments which speaks the truth) and take it to a country with even greater privacy protection. The correct procedure is when thousands of allegations have been made of misconduct against judge Simon Oliver, that Simon Oliver is suspended from duties, then all of his judgements are revisited. Statements should also be taken from litigants addressing concerns and in return Mr Oliver is prosecuted by the Ministry of Justice, the Government Legal Department and the Crown Prosecution Service. However, the reverse seems to be what the Ministry of Justice are doing here and that is to protect the bigger fish. It will not work. We are here for you the public and we will fight for you until the end. In the meantime, please feel free to comment on our new site and distribute it throughout your social media channels.

Welcome to this site which is part of Operation ‘X’. If you have reached here, it must be because a Judge or a lawyer has been up to no good. Well, look no further because we are here to help. Operation ‘X’ is here to help the public against bribery and corruption in the British Judicial system. This site represents the truth against publicly funded criminals and exposes the criminals that operate in our judicial offices.

His Honour Judge Simon Oliver works at the Upper Tribunal in London, Isleworth Crown Court and the family court in Reading and Slough County Courts.

This website deals with HHJ Simon Oliver asking for, accepting and taking bribes to pervert the course of justice. He is racist, extremely corrupt, perverts the course of justice and commits perjury in return for illegal and criminal bribes in the UK court system.

A judge for sale: These are pictures of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver. He is the one who takes bribes using the term ‘gift’. He is the criminal in the court system and eyewitness testimony exists to confirm this and the substantial amounts of comments on this site confirms it further.
The proud Berkshire Freemason in all his glory: Judge Simon Oliver in his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. This is an association he is not supposed to have. His association with the Berkshire Freemasons has clear ramifications on his decision making skills which is evident from this website and other media postings about him online.

On June 24th, 2014, our team were sat in the Upper Tribunal located in the Breams Buildings in London for a case involving an unrepresented member of the public against a government department called the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). The DBS has functions to bar people from working with children and vulnerable adults. 

At the oral hearing which lasted 4 days, HHJ Simon Oliver asked for a ‘gift’ from the parties concerned. The DBS gave him a gift in the form of a box which was wrapped up in a Sainsbury’s Carrier bag. Since then, HHJ Simon Oliver made a mockery out of the court system and the judgement he gave.

IF YOU HAVE THIS JUDGE IN YOUR CASE, PLEASE NOTE, HE TAKES BRIBES IN THE FORM OF ‘GIFT BOXES’.

IF THE JUDGEMENT YOU RECEIVED IS FILLED WITH LIES, ITS BECAUSE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAS RECEIVED A GIFT THROUGH OTHER MEANS.

IF HE GIVES YOU A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT AND PENALTY, APPEAL IT AS ITS MOST LIKELY HE HAS RECEIVED ‘GIFTS’.

The ‘Gift’ System

ON NOTE, PLEASE BE MINDED, A GIFT IS AN ALTERNATIVE WORD FOR A BRIBE AND INVOLVES MONEY, HOLIDAYS, CRUISES AND JUST ABOUT ANYTHING OF VALUE. HOWEVER, MONEY IS THE MOST COMMON ALONG WITH A NOTE INSIDE THE BOX ABOUT WHAT JUDGEMENT THEY REQUIRE. THE SYSTEM WORKS WHEN ONE LAWYER GIVES THE JUDGE A BOX OR PLACES A BOX SOMEWHERE IN THE COURTROOM WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING. THE COURT CLERK IS USUALLY ALSO INVOLVED. THE BOX IS USUALLY FROM THEIR CLIENT AND CONTAINS SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF MONEY (MINIMUM £8,000). IT IS ALSO COMMON FOR THE DEFENCE LEGAL TEAM TO GET BRIBED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE LEGAL AID FUNDED. ALTERNATIVE WORDS FOR BRIBES ARE ‘LOANS’. WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING, THE BOX GOES MISSING AND A FAVOURABLE JUDGEMENT IS GIVEN BY THE JUDGE TO THE PARTY WHO GAVE THE GIFT OR LOAN TO THEM. THIS IS KNOWN AS ‘THE GIFT SYSTEM’.

This is what took place throughout the 4 day hearing.

Incident in question

On day 1 of the oral hearing:

  • Within 5-10 minutes of the oral hearing initiating, HHJ Simon Oliver puts his hand over the microphone and says ‘Do you have anything for me?’. His head was down at this moment and we believe he was talking to the other side but no one specifically. The DBS barrister ‘BJ’ from Blackstone chambers in London, also putting his hand over the microphone (Only after HHJ Simon Oliver directed he do so with hand gestures) says ‘My client has a gift for you from The Trust’ (from The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust CEO Robert Bell and the Director of HR Carol Johnson). Kevin Brooks from the Treasury Solicitors (TSOL), now called the Government legal department, approaches the judicial bench with a box (the size of a book) in an orange Sainsbury’s carrier bag. HHJ Simon Oliver immediately puts his other hand up whilst his initial hand was still on the microphone and stops Kevin Brooks in his tracks. HHJ Simon Oliver directs his right hand to his left to which Kevin Brooks puts his head down and follows to the end of the judicial bench. Mr Brooks tucks the box in neatly under or behind the bench or a table at the end of the bench away from sight although we could still see a piece of the carrier bag appearing from the area it was placed in. At this moment, a gasp appears in the courtroom about the incident and apparently the way Mr Brooks approached the judicial bench. Michael Flynn (Norwich magistrates court judge), a specialist panel member whom also had his hand on his microphone during this period continued writing something whilst he clearly noticed the event. Janice Funnell (child psychologist from Merton council), another specialist member laughed at the incident. Simon Oliver had an embarrassed smirk on his face as in ‘Have i been caught?’. After this, BJ and HHJ Simon Oliver took their hands off the microphone. We are not sure if Michael Flynn or Janice Funnell had their hands on the microphone at this time as we were not observing them or their hands at this time.
  • The first day of the hearing was not bad. The judiciary seemed straight forward and impartial. Michael Flynn began doing some minor hand gestures towards the end of the day which we did not consider a major problem at the time. He did the hand gestures around 4-5 times (in guise that’s he’s not interested).
  • An adjournment took place around lunchtime at HHJ Simon Oliver’s request. At this time, the DBS barrister BJ asked the appellant that they can leave the courtroom and have a break and to come back in 15 minutes. During this break, the DBS senior management and officials were sat in the back of the courtroom started preparing boxes quickly. Whilst the appellant was outside the courtroom, the DBS senior management (at the request of the DBS CEO Adele Downey), placed a box under the judicial bench. It is unknown what contained in the box but it is very highly likely that it was money in the form of a bribe. When the entire courtroom came back, the DBS senior management and BJ directed to HHJ Simon Oliver that there was ‘something’ under the table for him. HHJ Simon Oliver nodded in acceptance but did not approach the area of the judicial bench where the DBS senior management were pointing towards. 
  • Towards the end of the hearing on the first day when the judiciary were retiring, HHJ Simon Oliver, Janice Funnell and Michael Flynn stood up to leave and were partly gone through the back door. Janice Funnell was the first one to leave through the back door and HHJ Simon Oliver was partly through the back door and Michael Flynn was in the process of going through the back door. That is when Kevin Brooks of the TSOL and unknown members in the back of the court room uttered some words (unknown to what it was) and pointed out to the box under the judicial bench/table. To this, HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Oh yeah’ and directed Michael Flynn pick up the box as Michael Flynn was the last one to leave through the back door. Michael Flynn picked both boxes casually and put it with the rest of the items in his hand and left through the back door. At this incident, there was a gasp in the back of the courtroom in shock. HHJ Simon Oliver in the meantime had a grin on his face pretending he didn’t know what he was doing. We are unsure if it was the same boxes that were placed in the morning and the early afternoon as it was picked up quite quickly and Michael Flynns back was also turned towards us during this time. If we remember correctly, it was exactly the same boxes as the boxes that were placed there previously did not appear to be there any longer. Michael Flynn placed one box under his left arm and another box in his left hand with a folder and notepad and quietly left through the back door.

On day 2 of the oral hearing:

  • On the second day of the hearing, substantial number of hand gestures started off by HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was more proficient in the hand gestures and he also made facial expressions and gasping noises throughout the day. HHJ Simon Oliver just did hand gestures.
  • The box in the carrier bag was no longer visible from where we were sitting and we believe the box was removed the day earlier was the same box that was no longer there. The second box, we could not see at all.
  • By the end of the morning before lunch, we noticed Michael Flynn give an excess of 30 hand gestures in the form of a wave insinuating he is not interested in the appellants case and the defences. HHJ Simon Oliver did minor hand gestures, probably around 5-10 during this same period.
  • A witness called JR was being cross examined. During the cross examination, Michael Flynn puts his hand over the microphone and asked the appellant to change the question nearly 5-10 times. HHJ Simon Oliver agreed to this. Michael Flynn also continued his hand gestures to another 40-50 in the afternoon. HHJ Simon Oliver also did the same at around 20 times.
  • Michael Flynn started doing facial expressions by moving his head away in a gesture that he is not interested or he is not listening. This happened nearly 30-40 times in the afternoon alone.
  • Michael Flynn started questioning JR about the job but that is as far as his specialist knowledge went. He was actually learning from the witnesses rather than agreeing or disagreeing with the specialist element. Michael Flynn also put his hand up during the appellants cross examination of JR stating he wants to listen to JR and not the appellant. Simon Oliver did the same in addition to Michael Flynn.
  • During the afternoon hearing. Michael Flynn threw his pen on the judicial bench several times, around 10 times in a gesture that he’s fed up of listening to the appellant speak. A racist comment was made at this time that ‘Your the type of person who should just be working at a petrol station’. This was by Michael Flynn and is a racial slur. Due to the appellants unrepresented nature, they didn’t know how to respond. Michael Flynn also tried to put words in their mouth.
  • The appellant spoke in regards to a golliwog matter where staff members at the former employer were carrying golliwogs and the management of the hospital took no action against the perpetrators. HHJ Simon Oliver said to this remark with his hand once again on the microphone ‘Golliwogs are not a racist, it was at once inappropriate’. Michael Flynn had a stern look on his face and nodded yes.
  • During JRs cross examination, HHJ Simon Oliver said to JR ‘Would you like his name on the internet if BJ upholds this case?’. JR responds by saying ‘Well, most hospitals are aware of him and to stay away from him’. HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘That’s good’. This was incredibly concerning as this was an actual request by the judge to one of the witnesses. We do not believe hands were on any microphones at this time so it may have been recorded although HHJ Simon Oliver kept his distance from the microphone quite a bit.
  • Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver puts their hands over the microphone about 3 times whilst they whispered to one another without any other party involved what they were discussing. 

On day 3 of the oral hearing:

  • During the cross examination of GB, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver carried on their hand gestures. Michael Flynn may have carried out 50-60 hand gestures, 20 pen throws on his desk, 30 facial expressions and moving his head away and 2 whispers with Simon Oliver. Michael Flynns hands were once again on the microphone several times that we could not count the amount of times he did it. The same with HHJ Simon Oliver where he nodded his head around 5 times and waved his hand about 20 times.
  • When the appellant questioned GB about JRs statement ‘well, JR said in her statement that……..?’. The appellant was immediately interrupted by Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver saying ‘ no, no, no ,no ,no’ and tapping and banging their hands on the table. Michael Flynn once again nodding several times. HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘That’s now 5 times you have misquoted’. In fact, the appellant did not misquote, it was an actual statement in JRs statement. The hand gestures were far greater on this day and nothing the appellant was saying was being heard.
  • A witness called GB was very honest and said that the appellant has to give the judge a gift if they want a favoured judgement. To this remark, HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand on the microphones and told GB ‘No, no, no!’ and ‘shhhh’ to prevent the appellant finding out what happened earlier on.
  • Michael Flynn started an allegation about the appellant not being qualified and that the appellant lied to an agency they were working with. The appellant stated that a clinical specialist does not have to be qualified and they can practice with an equivalent and they did not lie to any agency or anyone for that matter. Michael Flynn stated ‘Your not qualified’ about 15 times and ‘Yes, you did lie’ about 10 times. This was based on no evidence. The appellant said ‘well, the agency are specialists and they never said that’. Michael Flynn states ‘What, they are more specialist then me!’. The appellant said ‘I don’t know what your knowledge of the field is’. Michael Flynn states ‘Well, that should tell you then’ very rudely whilst still doing hand gestures and putting his hand over microphones. Michael Flynn then asks BJ and the TSOL to ask The Trust ‘Whether the appellant needs to be qualified’. If Michael Flynn was a specialist, he should have no problem answering this question himself rather than asking The Trust. Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver said to the appellant ‘Don’t worry, this isn’t going to form part of the judgement, we just want to know for ourselves, its all OK, don’t worry about it’. HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Yes, don’t worry, its OK’. The response from The Trust came back that the appellant does not have to be qualified to practice so therefore the appellant was correct all along although the judgement does not report this and only reports the fabricated version.
  • When the appellant was being cross examined and was in the dock, HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘Move closer to the microphone, we want to capture all the content so there are not mistakes whilst their hands were on the microphone themselves.
  • Michael Flynn did 3 hand gestures during the appellants cross examination and nearly 20 times rolling his eyes and moving his face in annoyance. HHJ Simon Oliver at this time sat back smirking and grinning behind his hand.
  • Towards the end of the days hearing, HHJ Simon Oliver asked the DBS barrister BJ using hand gestures, whilst his other hand was on the microphone once again about the box that was placed in the corner of the bench on the first day. HHJ Simon Oliver was trying to see if the appellant knew about what happened so that Mr Oliver can protect himself better. BJ said ‘So you gave Mr ‘KA’ a bribe?’ . The appellant responded and said ‘no, i did no such thing. it was a fee KA requested for an employment reference’. On that note, Mr Oliver seemed satisfied that he was protected.

On day 4 of the oral hearing:

  • This day summing up was occurring. BJ spent over 30 minutes we believe on his summing up.
  • HHJ Simon Oliver said to BJ that the appellant was a ‘deserted rat’ to which Michael Flynn nodded his head.
  • When the appellant was summing up their case, Michael Flynn was waving his hand again about 20-30 times as though he is not interested, HHJ Simon Oliver did it 3 times.
  • Michael Flynn shouted out at the appellant during summing up ‘What, you want to work in a hospital?’. The appellant said ‘Yes, i do and i didn’t harm any child or vulnerable adult’. To this response, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver responded ‘Well, that’s what we will consider’. Facial expressions and head movements were occurring during this comment.
  • The appellant put forward a case that their human rights have been breached and the procedure to bar was breached which is correct. Michael Flynn waved his hand at this remark. The appellant further mentioned the golliwog and HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘I already mentioned it yesterday, its not racist, it was made in to a big thing at one time’. This comment was made in a much lower voice away from his microphone.
  • Eventually 10 minutes in to the summing up, Michael Flynn and Simon Oliver once again were putting their hands over the microphones and whispering to one another. This occurred 3 times. Eventually HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand up in gesture of STOP! And thats enough of the appellants summing up when they had another 20 minutes of material to put forward which put forward errors of law and facts.
  • The last issue we remembered when the appellant was asking HHJ Simon Oliver how long will it be before they receive the judgement. He said with a smirk on his face that he will be going on holiday for 3 weeks and so the appellant will not receive the judgement under the end of July 2014. He also stated that he will be on a beach somewhere on a last minute holiday. To this remark, Michael Flynn, Janice Funnell, BJ and others in the back of the courtroom could be heard smirking and laughing. We believe this was HHJ Simon Oliver indirectly implying the contents of the box he retrieved on the first/second of the hearing contained monetary/holiday value and that he will be spending it on a luxury holiday on a beach.
  • The final moment was when the judiciary were leaving, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver with grins of their faces stood up and continued waving their hand at the appellant as though they are not interested for nearly 20 seconds before retiring.

Throughout the hearing, it was only Janice Funnell who acted professionally and listened to both sides but we believe she was looking towards HHJ Simon Oliver to understand what he was doing throughout. We think Janice Funnell has an approach that ’Its a mans world’ rather then act on anything she will observe is wrong. Although our complaint does not relate to her as we had confidence she behaved herself professionally throughout the majority of the hearing.

After observing the judgement, it was clear it was filled with lies, falsehood and deceit and clearly the appellant wasn’t heard. In fact, it would be sensible to say the appellant should not have turned up at the hearing. No safeguarding concerns were identified and no evidence supported the false allegations made against the appellant by the judiciary. The conduct of the judiciary shows they are/were severely biased as even a mere act of impropriety should not exist when handling cases when clearly with the substantial incidents addressed above shows this matter has gone beyond a mere act or a single incident. 

In 2015, the appellant asked the tribunal to reconsider the case under ‘errors of law’. The appellant received a somewhat concerning letter and response from HHJ Simon Oliver basically stating he will in future consider issuing a civil restraint order that the appellant does not agree with his judgement when the appeal was on errors of law. Once again, HHJ Simon Oliver did not respond to the grounds of appeal under errors of law but rather ignored it just like he ignored it at the hearing and at the review of the decision. HHJ Simon Oliver was using his professional powers for personal gain by trying to push the appellant around once again. 

We were also somewhat surprised that HHJ Simon Oliver and other members of the courtroom and judiciary were making a mockery of the court system and communicating with hand gestures the majority of the time and placing hands on microphones throughout the hearing too.

Furthermore, the judiciary, mainly HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn should be suspended from their duties pending disciplinary action against them and also criminal charges placed upon them for:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Bribery under The Bribery Act 2010

  • Misconduct in a public office

  • Money laundering

  • Fraud

  • Misuse of public funds

  • Accessory to corrupting public morals

  • Dishonesty

  • Fraud by abuse of position

Additional charges related to other cases:

  • Sexual harassment

  • Soliciting for sex

  • Sexual assault

Consideration needs to also be given towards whether Kevin Brooks whom is the Government legal departments solicitor should also be prosecuted under the bribery act and for perverting the course of justice for giving and relaying a ‘gift’ to HHJ Simon Oliver from the CEO of the DBS Adele Downey and The Trust.

Complaint made to the Upper Tribunal President – Justice William Charles.

A complaint was made to Justice William Charles of the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber about the issues raised. Initially Justice William Charles ignored all correspondence but after persistence from the appellant for over a year, he responded. He accepted the complaint and investigated it. After 6 weeks of investigating, the conclusion of Justice William Charles was:

  • The appellant was lying but does not support it with evidence. He claims the allegation in ‘incredible’
  • He refuses to investigate the matter of the gift box exchanging hands claiming the allegations are ‘Incredible’ and does not require further investigation.
  • He also claims in his letter that the recordings ‘cannot be retrieved’ on the ‘Dart Server’ and he has not got access to it. No reasons or investigation has been carried out or provided to decide where the recordings have gone. We believe it has been deliberately deleted to cover up the bribe in question and the behaviour complained of.
  • The president of the Upper Tribunal claims the appellants ‘makes matters up’. No evidence is provided to support the claim.

In 2016, the matter progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO) on the procedure of the initial complaint. The outcome was that Justice William Charles has every right not to investigate the complaint as that is his right. A separate police investigation is also underway by the Metropolitan police.

Judicial complaints process:

Judicial Conduct investigations Office (JCIO):

In 2016 and 2017, a complaint was made using the judicial complaints system. As Justice William Charles covered the matter up, the matter was progressed to the Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office who stated that the Tribunal presidents decision or cover up should be progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO). 

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO):

The response from JACO was that Justice William Charles is entitled not to investigate the allegations of Judge Simon Oliver taking bribes. As this cover up now goes to senior levels, we the public must now fight.

Police Investigation:

As of June 2016, HHJ Simon Oliver, Michael Flynn, Justice William Charles and the Government legal departments Solicitor Kevin Brooks are being investigated by London police.

This web page has been created to warn the members of the public and the taxpayer that if you have HHJ Simon Oliver as a Judge, beware, HE TAKES BRIBES. What is even more concerning is his main speciality is the family division of Reading County Court and Safeguarding and he has the potential to damage and destroy other peoples families and lives because he wants bribes and gifts all the time. There is a reason why he places his hands on microphones all the time during the court hearings, it’s because he knows he is doing something wrong that he does not want recorded. The reason he does it is because his superiors are also doing it and encouraging him to do it as well. 

Personal life and the use of male prostitutes

Judge Simon claims he practices religion in his private life and seems to know a little about the religions practices although this is also a fraud considering he takes bribes in his professional life. He is lying to God and to everyone else around him about his faith as he does not practice what he preaches.

In 2016, his wife Elizabeth kicked him out of their family home because it came to light he was using male prostitutes and he was also involved in a gay relationship with another man. Although there is nothing wrong in being gay, it gives credence to the fact that Judge Simon Oliver is so dishonest in his personal life that he would lead his wife on for lengthy periods of time under falsehood and deceit. He lied to his wife, he cheated on her and he hid his sexuality from her too. We can only wonder what she went through. She should be commended for kicking him out of the family home. She should now expose him for the bribes he took throughout his judicial and legal career. Judge Simon Oliver also has two sons. One is Ben Oliver who works for FSP Law in Reading and the other is Edward Oliver who also works as a lawyer as well. Ben Oliver and Simon Oliver have both previously worked together on the same case where Ben is the lawyer representing his client and Simon as the judge. This is without disclosing the relationship to anyone else in the court room. This is another instance of fraud which has resulted innocent people going to prison. It is unknown how many cases have been heard under this guise.

Using rent boys and young adults to satisfy his sexual desires: Judge Simon Oliver is seen out on a date with a young barrister in return for fast track promotions and ‘big case’ wins. Meanwhile his delusional wife sits at home ignoring it.

Allegations of Nipple Tweaking

Judge Simon Oliver has been reported several times of ‘Nipple tweaking’ in the court room. Several unrepresented litigants have observed this and complained about it but to no avail. Judge Oliver is known to use the technique of Nipple tweaking to divert attention from the litigation and refocus elsewhere in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. He continues to use this system until the present day because his employer, the Ministry of Justice encourages him to do this.

HHJ Simon Olivers Home

HHJ Simon Oliver lives a lavish lifestyle in a 5 bedroom house located in the suburbs of Wokingham, Berkshire which is valued at £700,000, far more excessive then his annual salary of £127,000. This is from the proceeds of his criminal activities. His son Benjamin states he has never seen any of his fathers money but he strangely forgets the big house that is fully paid for from bribe money and extortion.

The address is:

Glenwood, 20 Lowther Road, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG41 1JD.

The house that was built by perverting the course of justice – Judge Simon Olivers residence which has been built by criminal proceeds of bribes and money laundering which he has been involved in for several decades. Thames Valley Police have installed a special alarm in his house so they can look after their special friend.

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fraud investigations initiate if Judge Simon Oliver is challenged by litigants

Many people have reported that when they have challenged judge Simon Oliver on his decision-making skills, conduct, behaviour, or even take their case to social media, are subjected to department of work and pensions (DWP) fraud investigations. This is usually based on false allegations made by judge Simon Oliver in an attempt to sabotage the litigants financial means. Simon Oliver has direct connections in the department of work and pensions and can initiate fraud investigations within four weeks. Unfortunately, fabricated fraud Investigations by another government department is not the duty of the DWP and should certainly not be financed by the taxpayer. The vast majority of litigants who challenged Simon Oliver are cleared of any wrongdoing. In fact, the only person that really does any fraud is actually Simon Oliver himself by using his ‘gifts’ and money laundering tactics using the court process. Several other litigants involved in family cases have had their housing benefit revoked and are evicted from their homes just so that Simon Oliver does not have to rule it in their favour. The excuse that he uses is that they do not have appropriate accommodation to accommodate a child when it was Simon Oliver who organised it in the first place. It’s obvious by reading the comments on this site that the only one that is involved in fraud and money laundering is actually Simon Oliver. He is also protected by government legal department, the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police. The Berkshire Freemasons are not that far off either. They have protected him for decades knowing full well of his criminal activities. None of these departments and bodies have ever bothered even investigating him.

Thames Valley Police

Thames Valley Police (TVP) have also been implicated in criminal activities involving judge Simon Oliver. In fact, they have a very good relationship with each other and he regularly attends functions and Christmas parties at Reading police station. TVP are fully aware of Simon Oliver’s activities involving child abductions, bribe taking, freemasonry and other criminal activities. Several people have reported that Simon Oliver uses Thames Valley Police to attend other people’s properties to assault them and steal their possessions. They also enforce fraudulent court orders which have been faked using an unknown judge to steal positions or obtain material that Simon Oliver can use for blackmail purposes. Children have also been abducted in a similar manner. Simon Oliver has direct connections with senior members of TVP who are also allegedly Freemasons. When complaints are made to TVP about this inappropriate relationship between them and Simon Oliver, they refuse to acknowledge or respond to such requests. Other police forces use similar tactics to avoid discussing the matter either. Because of this very good relationship that Simon Oliver has with the police, he is never subjected to any criminal investigation but he is certainly protected by them because they have installed an alarm in his home with direct response by all police in the TVP catchment area. This was upgraded by the Ministry of Justice. The purpose of this alarm is so that judge Simon Oliver can continue doing his criminal activities and being protected at the same time (by using tax payer money to do so)

Berkshire Freemasons

Judge Simon Oliver is a senior member in the cult organisation called The Berkshire Freemasons. He uses this Freemasonry connection to pervert the course of justice and carry out more criminal activity. Many judges, lawyers, police inspectors and other senior figures in government use this Freemasonry connection to prevent the wider public receiving justice. Something which the tax payer already pays for. Judge Simon Oliver uses his Freemasonry connection, not only in Berkshire but also in Didcot and London. He claims its only ‘for fun’ but there is nothing fun about the horrific ordeals others in the public have to go through because of him. Since his wife kicked him out, he uses Sindlesham courts address for correspondence. But please note, he does not live here, this is where he gets his mail. It is part of the masonic lodge which he is a member of. This masonic lodge is the headquarters of the Berkshire Freemasons which is a secret cult society.

The address of the Berkshire Freemasons is:

Sindlesham Court, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire, England, RG41 5EA.

The Fraud and Money Laundering Empire explained: This premises is paid for by the taxpayers and the bribes and gifts he has received during the course of his career by lying, misrepresenting, colluding, cheating, stealing and fraud against innocent members of the public. It seems like lying, cheating and taking bribes has paid off for Simon Oliver.
The Worshipful Brother Judge Simon Oliver: In his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. He uses this association to commit more crimes in court but being protected by fellow Freemasons who encourage him to do this. He is protected by his senior Freemasons in his lodge because they also need his assistance to launder money. The crimes he commits is taking bribes, legal child abductions and committing fraud on a mass scale.

2017 and 2018

In 2017, his wife allowed him to come back home.

Benjamin Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Benjamin Oliver is the son of judge Simon Oliver. He currently works as a partner in Field, Seymour, Parkes (FSP) law based in Reading. He specialises in creating wills, inheritance, control of trusts and lasting power of attorneys. Ben Oliver uses his position to launder his father’s criminal money using his speciality in probate law. Ben has also come before his father in court where Simon Oliver was the judge and his son Ben was the lawyer representing one of the parties. This was without disclosing to anyone their relationship so they could maximise the amount of money that they can make. Many people who challenge Simon Oliver’s behavior and his fabricated judgements usually are attacked by FSP law. Ben Oliver targets the litigant in order to destroy them. He liaises with Thames Valley Police to do this as well. Ben has also advised his clients that they have to give 5-figure sums to his firm so that they can pass it on to Simon Oliver and guarantee a favourable judgement. None of these allegations have been defended by Simon Oliver or Ben Oliver. Ben Oliver has also worked as a crown prosecutor to prosecute parents in family law cases in Westminster magistrates court. This was most likely because his father Simon asked him to do it.

Ben Oliver attended Warwickshire university and gained a first class honours degree in economics. He graduated in 2009. He then attended the Guildford college of law to complete further qualifications in law and eventually gaining an LLM in 2011. He has since worked at FSP law from 2011 until the present day eventually becoming a partner. The reason Ben Oliver did a degree in economics first was because his grades were not good enough to do a law degree as a direct entry from college. He eventually overcame this after he received his economics degree. Since then he has been committing heinous acts of criminal activity as a solicitor whilst being covered up by his father Simon Oliver and and their association with Thames Valley Police which prevents them from being prosecuted.

Ben Oliver – Simon Oliver’s son Ben Oliver also known as FSP laws one and only ‘deputy child abductor’. Ben works alongside his father Simon also committing vile acts of crimes where he uses his economics degree to advise clients how to bribe judges and launder money.

Ben Oliver is married to a woman called Kathleen Norton and they both have two children. They live in Basingstoke in a million pound mansion. This has been bought by all the criminal money the father and son team have made from bribes and other criminal activities at the expense of the taxpayer and the public.

Ben Oliver and his wife Kathleen Norton – Simon and Ben Oliver protect their own children (and grandchildren) whilst targeting and abusing other peoples children (and laundering money at the same time). Ben Oliver is a disgrace just like his father. These two products of the Oliver household are now reproducing to continue the crimes they inflict on society upon generation after generation.

Edward Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Edward Oliver is Simon Oliver’s second son. He also works in the legal industry. He’s not a current practising solicitor or barrister and tries to keep away from his father’s bad reputation. He is also married but has no children.

Edward Oliver and his wife standing in Simon Olivers back garden – Edward is the second son of Simon Oliver but he is too embarrassed of his fathers behaviour that he chooses to keep a low profile. We are sure he’s also laundering money and bringing harm to society one way or another, it just happens, he’s a closed case.

The Worshipful Company of the Horners

Judge Simon Oliver is also affiliated with the livery organisation called The Worshipful Company of the Horners. This organisation also has judges, lawyers and police officers, all working in a cult committing more fraud and crimes against the public. Mr Oliver was inducted into this organisation in 2018. He currently is still an active member and continues to bring shame upon them.  

Bringing shame and embarrassment on the Horners: Judge Simon Oliver being inducted in to a livery group in an attempt to launder money and collude with other professionals in industry.

The address of the Horners is:

The Hall, The Painters Hall, 9 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V 2AD.

Allegations of manipulating appeals in higher courts

Judge Simon Oliver has been caught manipulating and attempting to manipulate appeals in the higher courts to pervert justice. Lies that Simon Oliver wrote in his original judgement are then made worse if it is appealed. A search of Reading court uncovered evidence of this heinous crime to which Mr Oliver to this date has not responded to.

Attempting to pervert the course of justice: Judge Simon Oliver giving specific instructions to the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeals made against his order by a vulnerable adult. This denies justice to litigants and promotes and encourages criminal activity using the court process.

Practicing under false qualifications

Judge Simon Oliver has on numerous occasions been practicing under false qualifications. It has been gathered from reliable sources that Mr Oliver, prior to 2012 did not hold a Court of Protection license but was still hearing those cases which resulted in individuals being illegally asset seized. In other judgements, Mr Oliver claimed he was the ‘President of the Queens Bench Division’ of the High Court, a designated title he does not have authority to use, let alone have. 

A liar and a cheater exposed practicing under false qualifications: Judge Simon Oliver IS NOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION and neither he ever was. He is once against caught lying but not to his own detriment but that of his victims.

Jordan Publishing

In late 2017 and early 2018, HHJ Simon Oliver was working with Jordan Publishing to write his own book on special needs and the law. He published his book in November 2017 in Foyles bookstore in London. An image is shown below of this. The book is filled with lies and completely against reality. He had a deal with Jordan Publishing as one of his ‘Gifts’ from a solicitor who HHJ Simon Oliver works with in Reading. It is somewhat very concerning he is writing books now talking about special needs when in fact he is responsible for creating most of the special needs in children by behaving the way he does (taking bribes). Furthermore, he treats vulnerable people and people with special needs like rubbish and he mentions no where in his book about the bribes he takes and the requests for bribes (In the form of ‘gifts’ and ‘loans’).

Publishing lies in a book with the assistance of Jordan Publishing: HHJ Simon Oliver giving a speech at Foyles book store in London talking about his new book on special needs. A deal he most probably received through collusion and bribery in the first place. Unfortunately his book does not appear to be that popular as only 3 people turned up. 

Chairing conferences on special education needs

In June 2019, Mr Oliver was chairing a conference on special education needs in London claiming to be an expert in the field (when we know he isn’t). He sat there pretending to be interested when in fact in reality he treats people with special needs like dirt. The comments on this website and several other websites is evidence of it. This whole program was fabricated for the purposes of having confidence in him. Obviously no one at the conference was aware of Mr Olivers past or even if they were, they chose to ignore it.  Strangely so, he chose not to tweak his nipples at this event! Its probably because there were too many people there watching and it would not be appropriate to have so many witnesses to his crimes.

The DEPRIVER of liberty safeguards – Judge Simon Oliver chairing a conference on special education needs and trying to look professional in the process. In reality, Mr Oliver practices under false qualifications. Obviously no one had the audacity to stand up and ask him questions about his disgusting past which includes taking bribes, rapes and murders.

High Court proceedings in 2019 and 2020

Judge Simon Oliver initiated legal proceeding in the High Court in London against a former medical practitioner accusing them of being the publisher of this site. These were lies. He accused and gave sanctions against someone that was ‘suited’ for his lies. The individual concerned has commented on this site to clear their own name and accused Judge Simon Oliver of inventing the allegation and colluding with the High Court to get it falsely substantiated and then using the media to create fake articles stating that he was subjected to an attempted ‘Anthrax attack’. No evidence is supplied of these lies. These proceedings were financed by the Ministry of Justice and their Director Sir Richard Heaton (someone whose already being accused several times on the internet of being a paedophile). Mr Oliver did not state the allegations made on this site are false but just that he felt ‘Harassed’. We will let you use your own imagination to decide how pitiful of a response that is.

Government Legal Department attack Judges Behaving Badly to protect Freemason Simon Oliver

In 2020, web hosters in America were contacted by the Government Legal Department requesting this blog be taken offline. This attempt was based of fictional claims and did not work. America refused the request because America is a more reliable and superior country. The allegations relied upon were once again complete and utter lies and the level of dishonesty is unbelievable. The Government Legal Department stated that America is going to be held in contempt in a UK court. Obviously, America was not afraid and told the Government Legal Department where to go. So Freemason Judge Simon Oliver is once again back to the drawing board thinking of what to do next. The Government Legal Departments letter is published below.

Bullying and harassing web hosters in America: Judge Simon Oliver has been laughingly styled as ‘His Honour’ attempting to get this site down using fake court orders and tax payers money to attempt to cover up his crimes. It is a pitiful attempt which failed. 

False allegations of anthrax attacks

In December 2019, Judge Simon Oliver falsely accused a medical practitioner of plotting an anthrax attack against him and then distributed these allegations in the media. These allegations were completely and utterly fabricated and the only reason they were made was to racially harass an individual purely because they were Muslim and from a certain cultural background and libelling them in the process. No evidence has ever been produced supporting these allegations. The articles that have been published is a clear indication that Simon Oliver has no boundaries when he wants to instigate a hate crime against civilians and is prepared to use negative stereotypes against a specific religion to bolster his position as a victim. The claims that Mr Oliver was subjected to an attempt of an anthrax attack was never reported to the police and has never been reported to any anti-terrorist organisation. Mr Oliver and his legal team have only published this in the media to the detriment of all Muslims and continues to refuse to log this as a police report. The individual that Mr Oliver had been targeting has previously being falsely accused by Mr Oliver of being a paedophile and once again distributed in the media.

A ‘Victim’ of an ‘attempted’ anthrax attack: Judge Simon Oliver took to the media to label himself as a victim of a terrorist act. The allegation was invented by the Ministry of Justice to ruin a medical doctors reputation so they could protect Mr Oliver, his lodge and his rings.

Allegations of racism

Mr Oliver has previously himself been accused of making racial comments in the courtroom. These comments range from referring to African Caribbeans as ‘horse nostril’ and referring to Asians as ‘you should only be working in a corner shop’. He has been shown to have a strong history of making negative judgements against people of ethnicity, predominately of the black and minority backgrounds.

Pre-written judgements

Judge Simon Oliver and his network are regularly known to writing pre-written judgements. These are judgements and orders that have been written in advance of a hearing or any evidence being presented. This is perverting the course of justice as well as misconduct in a public office. Recent examples include a judgement given in the High court in December 2019 was pre-written by Simon Oliver for his own benefit. The evidence relied upon for this assertion is because Mr Olivers legal team published the judgement 12 days prior (29th November 2019) to the High court handing down this judgement on their own website with Matrix chambers. The metadata of this document has also been removed. The official hand down by the High court was the 10th of December 2019. No defence to this allegation has been made by Matrix chambers or Simon Oliver. The corruption is overwhelming and when Judge Simon Oliver is accused of corruption and bribery, he then commits more corruption and bribery to defend himself which involves casually forging documents and writing judgements beforehand to harm the original victims.

Evidence of a pre-written judgement: Judge Simon Oliver and Matrix chambers uploaded a copy of the approved judgement 12 days before it was handed down by the High Court on to the Matrix chambers website. The conclusion is that this was a kangaroo court. Something Mr Oliver has already been accused of thousands of times.

Black Lives Matter: African-Carribbean organised child abductions

In December 2019 and January 2020, several media publications in Ghana and Nigeria appeared accusing Judge Simon Oliver of rituals and organised child abductions from individuals mainly from the African community. Several parents who had their children taken away by Mr Oliver were banned from contacting their children whilst his connections ‘Lose’ children in the system. If the parents do try to contact their children, Judge Oliver imprisons them and then after their sentence deports them back to their African countries whilst their children are still in care. Its a technique Mr Oliver uses to prevent contact between children and parents whilst paedophile rings take over. Examples of this include the Musa and the Adajo family who have since been deported.

Black lives do matter: Judge Simon Oliver making headlines in West Africa where accusations of racially motivated negative judgements are being made against the African community. This is similar to allegations of terrorist activities falsely made by Mr Oliver against Muslims.

Several allegations have also been made again Mr Oliver. These consist of:

  • Making false claims in the media of being the victim of an anthrax attack by a Muslim NHS worker

  • Referring to African Carribbean litigants as ‘Horse nostril’

  • Regularly using racist language and stereotypes against black and ethnic minorities

  • Using rent boys for sexual gratification

  • Working with false qualifications as a Court of Protection judge when he does not hold a nominated license

  • Withholding medical certificates in cases involving extremely vulnerable adults

  • Refusing to comply with human rights legislation. More specifically but not limited to article 6, 8 and 10

  • Going into the back with social workers and other litigants with evidence and coming back out laughing and joking

  • Using limited companies to claim state funds to look after children he has put into care

  • Working with social services to carry out kangaroo courts where members of the public are at a disadvantage and having their children ‘stolen’

  • Working with the government department the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) to dismiss appeals and accuse innocent health professionals and teachers of being paedophiles whilst boxes are passed to him in court called ‘gifts’

  • Laundering tax payers moneys into offshore bank accounts under different names

  • Requesting from an appellant he requires a Porsche 911 car in return for a favourable judgement

  • Requesting from appellants he requires between £6000-£20,000+ in return for favourable judgements

  • Fabricating judicial judgements and orders in return for obtaining state funds for foster care 

  • Working with CID from Thames Valley Police to execute fabricated search and arrest warrants in return for stealing drugs and money from homes of known criminals and then using the seized items to sell to rival criminals for a fee

  • Being invited to Social services and Thames Valley Police Christmas parties and regularly playing golf with them

  • Refusing to comply with release orders from higher courts and under Human rights legislation’s

  • Using the judicial complaints system for racketeering purposes

  • Mr Oliver has also been allegedly involved in gang rapes of teenagers in care

  • Allegations of murder with the assistance and support of rogue officers from Thames Valley Police 

  • Requesting his court clerk Freddy Cutts to contact appellants and opponents legal teams (solicitors and barristers offices) in current court cases to ask for ‘loans’ and ‘gifts’ (bribes)

  • Mr Oliver has also been involved in contacting legal firms and requesting they desist from representing their clients in return for future favoured judgements and ‘big case wins’ to prevent his money laundering and fraud operations from being detected

If you have concerns about this judge or any other judge, please comment on the section provided below. Judges taking bribes are very common in the judicial system in the UK. Its called ‘The Gift System’. Its only when they get caught is when you see how the complaints process works which is a fraud itself. Judges even took bribes in the form of gift boxes in the Stephen Lawrence case but no one was held to account.

If you have any issues or problems in regards to the conduct of this judge, we advise you contact the police, obtain a crime report or crime reference number and leave it in the comments below so police complaints against this man can be recorded internationally. It is unlikely the police will record your complaint as the police refuse to act on criminals like this because its not good for their own business so if that is the case, just add your allegations in the comments below instead.

Lets take one small step for the taxpayer and the hard-working member of the public and one giant leap to exposing HHJ Simon Oliver as a corrupt judge who is guilty of dishonesty. bribery and criminal activity.

If you have any concerns and would like to send information or documents confidentially, please contact us on

jbb-blog@protonmail.com.

We do not answer all E-Mails but we do read everything.

Thank you for reading

2,506 comments

  1. To John Abbott.
    Dear John,

    Re:Please forward my e-mail address to Leonard Lawrence so that I can keep him advised.

    A unkown source posted to me the membership list of the Berkshire Masters’ Lodge No 3684
    I telephoned the Berkshire Masonic Centre and spoke to the Secretary. The secretary’s responce was not helpful. He did not believe that I have the membership details. I do, but I will not be disclosing it. I was recently visited by a Freemason associated with the Berkshire Masters’ Lodge No 3684 Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA. The information provided was very helpful. Even Freemasons (but not all) are unhappy with the Worshipful Master Simon Oliver.
    Kindest Regards
    Leonard Lawrence

  2. I also have been contacted by a senior officer/s from Thames Valley Police who also requested they be anonymised. I was advised were to look, how my home was sold (Land Registry Form MH4) It appears that some police officers and detectives are unhappy how Detective Inspector Nicholas Watt, Reading CID, was being used to take the blame should any future investigation to what occured to me take place.

    What is so sensative about me that disclosure is stictly prohibited ?

    “We have information that Thames Valley Police have the names of 6 people that Judge Simon Oliver wants prosecuted or imprisoned on crimes that have not been committed”.

    Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Head of Specialist Operations, Thames Valley Police, was/is the officer at the centre of my case. One wonders how many persons are serving prison sentances, wrongly convicted, as a direct result of Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton failure to disclose evidence to a court ?

    Solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law at BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks, was ordered to make a new statement to the court as to how BP Collins Solictors were in persession of my stolen financial documents. Solicitor Susan Andrews, thereafter, admitted that BP Collins Solicitors had obtained my stolen documents from their client, prior to having Hundreds of Thousand of Pounds in costs and adverse inferances placed upon me becouse I could not produce my stolen documents. DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT GILL WOOTTON HAD KNOWN IN 2004 (when a Detective Inspector) THAT BP COLLINS SOLICITORS HAD DISCLOSED SOME OF MY STOLEN DOCUMENTS, BUT TOOK NO ACTION TO RECOVER THEM FROM EITHER BP COLLINS SOLICITORS OF THEIR CLIENT.
    Regards
    Leonard Lawrence

  3. John,
    I was visited again by what is sometimes called GREY MEN. They had served with the Ministry of Defence and the Military & Civilian Police Service, they continual in law inforcement. The focus was on HHJ Simon Oliver and Det Supt Gill Wootton, Thames Valley Police. They had both held more senior rank that Det Supt Wootton.

    They were also focused on the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that had been used to hold me for 18 months by Slough and Reading County Court.

    I also had served in the Military, and it was the Royal Navy Benelevent Fund that help with my treatment costs when I was poisened by organophosates from flying.

    I have been given very clear instructions what to do.

    I have witnessed, and have also been on the recieving end of HHJ Simon Oliver’s bulling. HHJ Simon Oliver was entirly statisfied on the 30 August 2012 that I was evicted onto the streets, when with an aquired brain injury I was incapable of legal discussion and understanding, according to legal documents.

    The Royal Navy does not like bullies !!

    Email: Oliver, HHJ Judge, 11 Febuary 2013, 15:21

    Best Wishes
    Len Lawrence

  4. The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley are now aware of what is, and has been, occurring for many years in the Thames Valley Police area. Likewise, the Attorney General Geoffery Cox QC who I met last October. Sir Tom Winsor, Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) identified last year that 35,000 crimes, including rape, sexual abuse, etc had not been recorded by Thames Valley Police. The Chief Constable Francis Habgood left the force earlier this year. How may other senior officer knew that crimes were not being recorded ?

    My focus is on Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Head of the Seroius and Organised Cime Unit, Thames Valley Police.

    From: Hammond Paul
    Sent: 24 June 2019 16:31
    To: ‘len lawrence’; Chief Constable; Professional Standards
    Cc: privateoffice@attorneygeneral.gsi.gov.uk; tom winsor; PCC
    Subject: RE: [New comment] HHJ SIMON OLIVER –COURT – REFERRAL OF COMPLAINT AGAINST THAMES VALLEY POLICE PERSONNEL

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    Yours faithfully,

    Paul Hammond
    Chief Executive
    Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley

  5. Are you talking about third world here ?
    reading so many unbelievable stories , why does the Ministry of Justice or the Prime minister ,MPS ,Press ,FBI ,Diplomatic corruption unit Gov, Ombudsman ,etc
    do not do anything ?
    Who is this Jerk who protect him , is strange that he mass manipulate such authority

    best start sort good cops bad cops out to get order back ,arrest this scumbag and you will see order be restored as the rest shady judges will follow , such as Owens ,Moradifar , the whole Dodgy Reading
    here read
    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/feb/01/100-judges-and-magistrates-received-death-threats-over-cases-in-past-five-years

    from a whistleblower
    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/jan/23/whistleblower-judge-austerity-policies-have-made-courts-dangerous
    this is interessing for the parents in Reading and West BERKSHIRE
    THE Council had the oppertunity to add there comments but declined to b part
    head of the Council Ian Wardell complained to much monies spend on agency workers

    same to Nick Carter from West BERKSHIRE ,

    https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/reading-berkshire-news/reading-social-worker-speaks-out-10421479

    and yes headed to wherever Justice has to be done !

  6. To judges behaving badly

    Re: Len was apparently previously convicted of fraud which later got overturned. We believe that this was the actions of Simon Oliver directly or indirectly using TVP”

    Let me expand on the above.

    The Attorney General The. Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox was brief in October 2018 what occurred to me following the Hearing before His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver, at Reading County Court in April 2012. On or about the 11 February 2013 at around 15:00 hrs a telephone conversation took place between Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley, Senior High Court Family Judge for the Thames Valley Region and His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver.

    Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley, instructed His Honour Judge Simon Oliver to transferrer my case to the Court of Appeal.
    This is confirmed in His Honour Judge Simon Oliver email sent at 15:21 on the 11 February 2013 to Chris Horton HMCTS Reading.

    On the 2 April 2013 I was convicted of Fraud by a Government Agency without a hearing and fine £8825.24 with no rights of appeal. At the same time I became the subject of a Revenue and Customs investigation going back indefinitely. Finally, I was contacted by a police force advising me that I was under-investigation.

    Detectives from the Metropolitan Police invited me to meet them in London for coffee. I was given the name of the person that had requested the Metropolitan Police to investigate me and make life difficult for me. I was also contacted by a senior detective from Thames Valley Police (who identified himself, but requested that his identity remain secret) This officer advised me how my home was sold without authority from the Court of Protection. The Land Registry Form MH4 was used to remove the Land Registry Caution on my home without the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    The Government Agency who fine me £8825.24 in April 2012, on the 12 August 2013 telephone me to inform me that their actions had been malicious, the fine was set aside. My former operatives have traced the names of the persons involved and their addresses. It appears that it was to stop me getting Legal Aid for the Court of Appeal

    The solicitors involved were: Graeme S. Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks, Sarah B. Benfield, a Reading based solicitor, and Helen Mary Clift who having previously worked in Reading moved to work in the Office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts. The barristers were: Dominic George Thomas Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers (now Mr Recorder Nicholas Allen) and Caroline Willbourne,
    1 Garden Court Chambers.

    At exactly the same time Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley, instructed His Honour Judge Simon Oliver to transferrer my case to the Court of Appeal on the 11 February 2013, Mr Justice Adrian FULFORD (Now Lord Justice Adrian FULFORD made a order silencing me. A trap had also been set for me at the Court of Appeal. However, I was pre- warned.

    Mr Justice Adrian FULFORD sitting in the Queens Bench Division had upheld a judgement made by Master Basil Yoxall.
    Master Basil Yoxall who had refused to disclose to the Family Division and the Court of Protection, the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, CP3’s that had been issued to protect me. Master Basil Yoxall did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    July 2019 and the Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver has still to make the transferrer order to the Court of Appeal.

    The files containing the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, CP3’s that both Master Basil Yoxall and Mr Justice Adrian FULFORD (now Lord Justice Adrian Fulford) had refused to disclose to the Court of Protection were later placed on my living room table by an unknown source. Whoever did this overcame an alarm system and German Sheppard’s

    Do not expect Thames Valley Police to help you. The problem is at the rank of Detective Superintendent and above.
    The recent disclosure to me by the Office of Police Conduct is most informative about Thames Valley Police and a Detective Superintendent. Also the special procedures put into place to stop officers investigating my case .

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has an interesting network of friends, one of whom has been to visit me !!

    Best Wishes

    Leonard Lawrence

  7. Thank you very much for clarifying that Len. so the conclusion was that the nipple tweaker judge Oliver is allowed to not to refer your case to the court of appeal! He makes all that money from his oil business but he still wants to steal your home and cover it up. He really is a disgusting man. The freemasons are in the process of kicking him out now. That will come as a great pleasure to all his victims

  8. DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT GILL WOOTTON,
    Head of Force Intelligence and Specialist Operations Department, Thames Valley Police
    AND
    HIS HONOUR JUDGE, SIMON OLIVER, READING COUNTY COURT

    On or about August 2015 Neil Blackhurst, Senior Investigator, Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police, sent to Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police, information that HHJ Simon Oliver was hearing Court of Protection case/s at Reading County Court when he, HHJ Simon Oliver, did
    not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    HHJ Simon Oliver was only nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015

    THE IPCC/OFFICE OF POLICE CONDUCT FILES THAT HAVE BEEN SENT TO ME ARE MOST INFORMATIVE.
    Neil Blackhurst, Senior Investigator, Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police having visited me and viewed FIVE Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that he knew had not been disclosed to the Court of Protection, was informed by Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police not to take a statement from myself, Leonard Lawrence. Special procedures had been put into place to deal with Leonard Lawrence by Thames Valley Police, Professional Standards, under Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer. Tim De Meyer is now Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice- Thames Valley Police.

    (I have now been visited on two occasion by officers senior to Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer)

    Prior to Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell informing Neil Blackhurst, Senior Investigator, Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police, not to take a statement from me, Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell had taken instructions from his Detective Superintendent.

    Valerie Copping, Quality & Standards, Professional Standards Dept. TVP HQ South, Oxford Road, Kidlington OX5 2NX
    has identified DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT GILL WOOTTON as the Detective Superintendent from whom Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, was taking his instructions from.

    Leonard Lawrence
    4 July 2019

    CC
    Paul Hammond
    The Chief Executive
    Office of the Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner
    Police Headquarters
    Oxford Road
    Kidlington
    OX5 2NX
    —————————————————————————————-

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    Case: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938

    HHJ Simon Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not ?
    Barrister Dorian Day: It does.
    HHJ Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.
    Barrister Dorian Day: Yes

    —————————————————————————————
    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    ——————————————————————————————

    Chukwuma Uju
    Judicial Office for England & Wales
    Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LLE

    Our Reference:[104182] 31 March 2016 Freedom of Information Request

    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    Thank you for your e-mail of 17 March, in which you asked for the following information from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ): “Would you be so kind as to advise me of the date that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, DFJ Reading County Court, was appointed a ticketed Court of Protection judge?”

    I can confirm that the department holds information that you have asked for, and I am pleased to provide this to you. His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015

  9. It is not a single person that is doing mass protection of this corrupt bastard but our government that is useless and deliberately encouraging it. Have you noticed that when we start reading or listening to Isis material on the internet, the government takes swift action because they do not want us to believe or listen to what other countries are saying against our government. Our prime minister, our royal family and our government is completely shit and this is the reason why no one else in the world likes us. Our government has turned their back on everyone on a mass scale and encouraged this entire criminality network to continue. It is no wonder that people leave this country to join Isis, because Isis treats people equally and gives Justice.

  10. To: Kirkpatrick P and others.
    From: Len Lawrence

    What is occuring in the Thames Valley Area goes way way beyond HHJ Simon Oliver.
    This website judges behaving badly HHJ SIMON OLIVER represents a tipping point for justice.
    Through this website, I and other victims, particularly those that have had dealings with HHJ Simon Oliver
    are becoming united and sharing experiencies.

    Thames Valley Police officers are disclosing information, but off the record !
    HMCTS staff likewise, are disclosing information, both on and off the record.

    Barristers and Solicitors that appear afraid of HHJ Simon Oliver, like my own barrister Mr xxx. Following the
    hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver o the 16 April 2012 according to my solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors, HHJ Simon Oliver telephone my barrister at his Chambers, St Philips Chambers, Birmingham.

    Thereafter, my barrister withdrew from my case and I was asked to sign an agreement to pay barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings bench Walk Chambers £10,000 and approx £5000 to BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks.
    I was never told that Mrs Justice Pauffley had instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transferr my case to the Court of Appeal. HOW MANY OTHER CASE ARE THERE LIKE MINE ?

    I was recently visited by a Freemason from Berkshire, who knows The Worshipful Master Simon Oliver.
    The information was most helpful and has, and still is, being acted upon.

    Below is another case involving HHJ Simon Oliver. On this occassion Thames Valley Police are not the problem.
    The mother is elderly and has to travel many many miles to see her daughter.

    Hi xxx,
    I spent a few constructive and emotional hours with Ms xxxx today.
    Her daughter requires specialist care for her Cerebral Palsey and other ailments.
    I copy Len as Judge Oliver is applying the Court of Protection absent of any orders.
    Ms has a penal order from Oliver sitting in the Court of Protection at Reading that if she attempts to remove her 30/40 year old daughter from her carer she will be imprisoned.

    There are no orders pending and the daughter was placed with these specialist carers voluntary.
    The police have said absent of any deputising she is free to move her daughter.

    Social Workers lied over a criminal matter and was rejected by the Police where there was a successful slander proceedings.

    I have asked Mr/Mrs xxx to provide me with a detailed timeline of events in order that we can move forward.
    Her daughter is clearly depraved of her liberties and her difficulties not being attended to and being treated.

    I have explained to Ms xxxx that the Court of Protection is not my forte, however it does seem that Oliver is the one controlling this under Court of Protection jurisdiction.

    I will meet again in a few days once he/she has produced the timeline.

    Best regards …………..

  11. For the attention of the page owner
    just like to let you know that hhj simon oliver takes bribes in isleworth crown court as well. My daughter’s killer was convicted of manslaughter by a jury and when it came to sentencing, a closed court took place and the defendant came walking out with a smile on his face and free to go. No action taken because hhj simon oliver said so. The crown prosecutor and the police refused to correspond with me as well. Basically i think this closed hearing took place because his highness judge oliver was taking gifts again. Bastard was responsible for the murderer of my daughter to walk free.

  12. To: John Campbell QPM, Chief Constable Thames Valley Police.
    From Leonard Lawrence

    LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION (HIGH COSTS, SPECIAL CASES UNIT)
    RE: LEONARD LAWRENCE
    THE CASE POSES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED BY THE COURT OF APPEAL
    SL03D00938

    31-MAR-2015 16:15 FROM RATCLIFFE DUCE GAMMER. TO 01753889851 (BP COLLINS SOLICITORS, BUCKS)
    Dr Tony feels that Mr Lawrence is even more vulnerable than when he last saw him.
    He (Dr Tony Consultant Psychiatrist) has advised Mr Lawrence that it would not be in his interest to attend court.
    He (Mr Lawrence) would not be able to rationally argue his case.

    Chief Constable Campbell, I have a letter from Martin John (see below)
    Martin John: Deputy Director, Operations, Infrastructure & Projects Authority, Cabinet Office
    Former Head of Civil Family & Tribunals HM Courts & Tribunals Service; UK Ministry of Justice
    Former Chief Executive & Public Guardian: UK Ministry of Justice

    I am to ask the barrister and solicitors below why they place Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds upon me in
    adverse costs and inferences upon me, knowing that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection.

    Barrister Dominic George Thomas BRAZIL, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers
    Solicitor Susan V. Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks.
    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser, OGR Stock Denton LLP Solicitors, Winston House 2 Dollis Park London N3 1HF

  13. I read that judge oliver puts his hands on the microphone. In my case, he used a piece of paper, rolled it up and started scrunching it on the microphone in front of everyone very occasionally throughout the oral hearing. He even used a fan on his desk and directed it to the microphone. I think this is to protect himself from complaints if any are made against him.

  14. Kerry D

    On the 16 April 2012 at Reading County I was represented by a barrister from St Philips Chambers, Birmingham,
    who was funded by The Legal Aid Agency, Exception Cases Unit. The hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver lasted
    one hour.

    HHJ Simon Oliver had available to him five Court of Protection Medical Certificates, but HHJ Simon Oliver did
    not hold a Court of Protection authorisation. HHJ Simon Oliver reserved judgement till 30 August 2012.

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    Case: Leonard Lawrence
    HHJ Simon Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not ?
    Barrister: It does.
    HHJ Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.
    Barrister Dorian: Yes

    On the 17 April 2012 I was telephoned by my solicitors Simpson Millar LLP and advised that His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver had telephoned my barrister at St Philips Chambers, Birmingham.

    Thereafter, Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors requested me to sign an agreement to pay barrister Dominic Brazil,
    1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, £10,000 cost for the one hour hearing. I was also requested to agree to pay
    BP Collins Solicitors a substantial amount of money as well.

    It is now known that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had been instructed by Mrs Justice Pauffley to send my
    case to the Court of Appeal on or about 11 February 2013. I was never told this.

    Leonard Lawrence

    p.s.
    Many of us have been failed by Thames Valley Police under Francis Habgood.
    This may explain why the good cops are forwarding some of us information, off the record.
    I thank those of you that have sent me your files/judgements/orders.
    There is a pattern of bulling with this judge and I, like others, have been on the receiving end.

  15. DC Rosemary March from force CID at Thames valley police is also Simon Oliver’s stooge. Her and Simon Oliver both get together to help him and protect him from getting caught when he commits crimes. She also helped him get evidence for civil cases by fabricating arrests on false charges. I can confirm that she is the officer that is investigating this website.

  16. this man asked me for £25,000 in return to have my name taken off the vulnerable adults and children’s barred list in the upper tribunal. I thought he was joking. He gave me 3 months to generate the funds but I could not make all of it so I lost the case. I went to the court of appeal and I put in my paperwork what Judge Oliver said to me and the court of appeal rejected it and said that there were no grounds of appeal because judges never take bribes. I say a load of bullshit

  17. I got him in my case in about a couple of months and after reading all of these comments, if he pulls off any stunts, I’m gonna shank him up.

  18. To: S….. B……
    Staff Officer to Lynne Owens
    Director-General of the National Crime Agency.
    National Crime Agency
    Units 1-6 Citadel Place, Tinworth Street, London SE11 5EF

    Dear S…
    Over the past two weeks I have been contacted by five other victims of HHJ Simon Oliver. Two of whom are
    like myself ex-military. They are female and come from the Royal Navy and Army. A third female victim
    worked for the Metropolitan Police.

    THESE VICTIMS NEED A REFERENCE NUMBER TO WRITE TO AT THE NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY.

    Det. Supt. Gavin Tyrrell, City of London Police has been most informative about his former employer Thames
    Valley Police and the SPECIAL PROCEDURES put into place by Thames Valley Police, Professional Standards,
    to neutralise investigations into HHJ Simon Oliver and Reading County Court.

    THE SCALES OF JUSTICE HAVE TIPPED, THERE ARE TO MANY VICTIMS.

    Below is a letter from a Freemason to Dr David Staples, Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England.

    Not so long ago I sat down with the former head of the Metropolitan Police SO xx and others (some of whom
    were Freemasons) in London. I explain what had occurred to me following the court hearing before HHJ Simon
    Oliver at Reading County Court in April 2012 and thereafter Mrs Justice Pauffley instructions to HHJ Simon
    Oliver to send my case to the Court of Appeal.

    Thereafter a Freemason belonged to a London Masonic Lodge, who’s members have included officers from the
    Lord Chancellors Office, Circuit Judges, the former Metropolitan Police Detective Training School at Hendon,
    The Obscene Publication Squad (The Dirty Squad) and finally the Military wrote to Dr David Staples, Chief
    Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England..

    Following the unhelpful reply by Dr David R Staples, CEO/Grand Secretary the Worshipful Master resigned
    from Freemasonry, along with others members and the Masonic Lodge shut down.

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

    p.s. A most informative FAX located and recovered for me.

    Fax 16:15 FROM GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICES TO FAX 01753 889851 BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross.
    2. Dr Tony feels that Mr Lawrence is even more vulnerable than when he last saw him.
    3. Has advised Mr Lawrence that it would not be in his interest to attend court.
    He would not be able to rationally argue his case

    —————————————————————————————-
    Dr David R Staples, CEO/Grand Secretary
    Freemasons’ Hall, 60 Great Queen Street, London, WC2B 5AZ

    Dear C…….

    Thank you for Dr David’s response.
    Please be assured this is not a vendetta, nor is it a case of spite or revenge.

    A senior official in the legal profession who is also a Freemason appears to have
    flouted the law, disregarded written instructions from his senior authorities and
    seriously purge red himself in a number of ways and over a considerable period of time.

    I am assured there is a mountain of evidence against this ‘Brother’ and several others.

    It is not for me to tell our CEO how to run his business, neither is it my custom to waste
    my time or that of other busy people. I do believe this is a matter worthy of consideration
    and if Dr David is too busy to give the matter further consideration, perhaps he could
    delegate the matter to a trusted aide?

    You will see I have copied Len Lawrence into this response.

    Yours sincerely,

  19. Dear All
    As we are in the middle of a summer heatwave, we would like to inform everyone to keep a bowl of water out in the garden for the birds, foxes and other animals to prevent them from dehydrating. Water is very important and is the basic requirement of life and animals cannot tell us when they are in need of water. As we are a Justice website, we do not like any living being to be put at any risk or harm and we aim to promote the safeguarding and well-being of all living creatures. However, if judge Simon Oliver aka the nipple tweaker comes to your house and asks for water, you have to respond by refusing it to him and closing the door in his face. Evil begets evil.
    Stay safe everyone and keep yourself hydrated and please do not forget to leave a bowl of water out for the animals.
    From the team at judges behaving badly

  20. To: Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg Thames Valley Police.
    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Mr Hogg, I am puzzelled why junior officers at the rank of Detective Chief Inspector, Detective
    Inspector and below are tasked with investigating events that have occured at Reading and Slough
    County Court when the actions of more senior officers requires clarification.

    Thames Valley Police were notified in 2015 by the Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and
    Cornwall Police, that HHJ Simon Oliver had conducted a Court of Protection hearing at Reading
    County Court on the 16 April 2012 and delievered a judgement on the 30 August 2012, when he
    (HHJ Simon Oliver) did not hold Court of Protection authorisation.

    His Honour Judge Oliver Simon Oliver arrived at Reading County Court in 2011
    His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015

    His Honour Judge Oliver was of the belief that as he held a Part 9 Family Authorisation to sit as
    a deputy High Court Family judge, that authorisation extended to the Court of Protection.
    It does not. See below From: Batey, James Form senior technical authority on C.O.P. Rules.

    How many Court of Protection cases has HHJ Simon Oliver conducted in the four year period
    prior to his authorisation to conduct Court of Protection hearings.

    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk.

    Mr Campbell, Mr Hogg I hope that you find the above informative
    Yours sincerly,
    Leonard Lawrence

    ps A RECOVERED EMAIL

    Email: 27 July 2005 Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors SBB/SD/L00529/2
    “Mr. Lawrence is not capable of discussing the legal proceedings and counsel (Nicholas Allen QC) and I (soliciotor
    Sarah Benfield RDG) are concerned about the implications of that upon any attendance we have with Mr. Lawrence”

    Hospital Consultant Dr (B) & Dr (C) NHS Medical Report Leonard Lawrence
    Mr Lawrence has a complex past medical history including organophosphate poisoning, neuropathic pain and brain injury. Suffered from throat swellings with difficulty swallowing speaking and breathing

  21. I guess you were lucky because he asked me for a hundred and fifty thousand pounds. As if I had that money. I asked him to give me that in writing he just waved his hand at me and left through the back door. Cunt

  22. For the past four weeks old school cops, soldiers, sailors and airmen/women have been helping me.

    I had a barrister funded by the Legal Services Commission, Exceptional Cases Unit.
    Following the Hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading County Court on the 16 April 2012,
    according to my then solicitors Simpson Millar LLP, on the 17 April 2012 HHJ Simon Oliver
    telephoned my barrister at St Philips Chambers Birmingham, thereafter my barrister withdrew
    from my case.

    Those of you that have sent me your judgements.

    You are being silenced by Civil Restraints Orders and Extended Civil Restraints Orders
    It is known His Honour Judge Oliver was only nominated to hear Court of Protection cases
    on 7 October 2015. My Court of Protection case was in 2012 !!

    The Ministry of Justice are not responding to the request below.

    When was His Honour Judge Simon Oliver appointed a Section 9 authorisation as a Deputy
    High Court Judge of the Queen’s Bench Division ?

    Perhaps some others could ask, please see below.

    Regards
    Len Lawrence
    —————————————————————————–
    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 21 July 2019
    To: LondonAndSouthEast@justice.gov.uk
    Cc: Navy Command Secretariat
    Subject: FW: Freedom of Information Act request

    To: Knowledge and Information Liaison Officer
    Knowledge and Information Liaison Unit | London and South East Regional Support Unit |
    3rd Floor | First Avenue House | 42-49 High Holborn | London | WC1V 6NP |
    LondonAndSouthEast@justice.gov.uk

    Dear Sir/Madam
    Freedom of Information Request

    Does His Honour Judge Simon Oliver hold a Section 9 authorisation as a Deputy High Court Judge
    of the Queen’s Bench Division ? If so, please advise of the date of appointment.

    Thank you for your assistance

    Yours sincerely

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc Director General National Crime Agency

  23. My 4 year old granddaughter was repeatedly raped by her foster carer snd died two years later. I was not told about her passing until a year after it happened. Hhj Simon Oliver was the one who placed her into care under controversial allegations which were not true against my daughter. Thames valley police said that they cannot investigate my grand daughters death because much has passed since I was informed. I still seek Justice until this day. Hhj Simon Oliver placed her into care in a 2 minute hearing where all he wanted to know was if there was any funding! This man is responsible for the rape and murder of my 4 year old granddaughter. She had her entire life ahead of her until this corrupt man got involved

  24. Haha, yes that is the fcuktard. Peacock is the perfect name for him because his cock is the size of pea! This is the man who relays bribes and contacts law firms asking for gifts and loans! He was actually bullied at school a lot, not surprised

  25. Why? Does the clerk move around with the judge? Is he not stationed at a particular court?

  26. Yep you are right ,he should be at one base ,and yes he was in Reading ,and wherever he is he has access to all reserved files for Oliver to pass round
    Oliver has people in admin who go hand in hand to block your application ,or temper with files ,… and yes in the high court and in the court of protection or to appeal

    Anette the clerk of the court of protection,who claimed that judge oliver and owens are judges in the court of protection and high court
    we know they not , but the new victims are got told by Anette who swears there are
    all in order to stop and redirect application to appeal the fake orders done back in 2016

    that is your kangaroo jump it starts with the dodgy admin and never get to any other courts such as the high court or court of appeal or court of protection ,

    coming aware of one Oliver’s child cases it took almost 2 and half years to receive an answer ,and then it came back with comment “sorry time has elapsed ”
    should you ask for an Update it causes admin to malfunction,meaning a new case number will be created,so your case looks discontinue ,or not consistent to any other judge to actual judge as info missing and class as inconsistency and application dismissed , meaning YOU SHALL NOT GO FURTHER !

  27. Good Morning,

    I thought you should be the 1st for the good news And not sure whether to make it public on judgesbehavingbadly less you put it onto your page, as it is your credit that my Kaiser is back and you do not know how much that mend to me well next is my daughter anyhow

    THANK YOU thank you SO MUCH

    your page has most properly pressurized the handler to let go and try to hide him and persistent as I am, must be the German in me, I never gave up and travelled up and down the country kennel to kennel but he was hidden in an antisocial area where there smoke cocaine used for profit, as he was sold to me as a Puppy, well a 60 kg dog fully grown is no puppy responding to the name Kaiser and is going bizarre when he saw me he jumped straight into my 4×4 and refused to come out by the teenagers who kept him in a baby cot with a 1 and a half old baby believing he is a puppy, the best thing is there though I am from the army well (at the time I am doing exercise with the army that how I came over and my uniform was on the back seat ) those morons thought when army she also deals with Police dogs, then a neighbour came over, told me that there already on numerous times called the council to report a dangerous dog being dropped off 3 weeks ago in the middle of the night in a van so yes I start questioning , such as what van, what is the connection with those 21year old who were those people were monies exchanged etc. yep I was pretty official I rescue GSD and know my part anyhow there was scared of me and handle him fast over, best is 3 weeks ago the claim against the Police has now been issued by the court (Claim no F76YJ701) awaiting hearing is strange when starting proceedings little miracles happen anything disappearing is appearing anyhow I think this will encourage everyone to come out with there cases
    knowing your page /your team can assist even with stole goods as my dog after 3 years, where stolen Dogs turn up eventually

    KAISER IS BACK I PICKED HIM UP IN WD38 Area,

    thank you once again, also if anyone needs a legal assistant I can assist, as I feel the threat being caution by the TVP is nonsense and not a crime YES I was cautioned to not help the old man when I stopped his eviction, he remains put I succeeded, since I am banned from the care home lol honest by WBC and being punished for no contacts to my daughter Elle.nOliver made sure that weaning progress is we were so close he did not like it that she also is constantly telling everyone I want to go home, 2 contact per years if ? as both are stricken out seen her only 2 times over the 3 years, anyhow the dog is back, an only with your help this was possible thank you

    Lady Ella

  28. Well done Ella. That is great news! Thank you for the update and for giving credit to us but the credit should all go to you because you are a very determined young lady. We are glad that we inspire you. This website has been created for the purposes of justice and for helping all those in society including yourself. Congratulations on getting your dog back. It was a pleasure to inspire and assist you. Now all that remains is that we all get together and help get your daughter back by any means neccessary

  29. Dear Mr Lawrence,
    Thank you for your e-mail of 17 March, in which you asked for the following information from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ):

    “Would you be so kind as to advise me of the date that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, DFJ Reading County Court, was appointed a ticketed Court of Protection judge?

    ”Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).I can confirm that the department holds information that you have asked for, and I am pleased to provide this to you.

    His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015.

  30. Theoretically, she was released with me over 3 years ago and I can bring her home if I know where she is!
    Unfortunately, no one gives me an indication of whom to command to return
    every approach to the authority is filed as a complaint
    and is bureaucracy questioned, any help was gagged or removed
    (as in fired) and my list adds
    it starts with the lawyer retreating, Barristers being stupid like donkey or not speaking any real english that goes out before I start,

    left with challenging the other partie Barrister on my own ,who also withdraw soonest she saw me she went back out the door lol
    reason I had a quiet word with the big boys the SRA (law society),and informing the chamber that discrimination and belittle the opponent is unacceptable and unprofessional

    anyhow she was replaced by someone from the Reading council and gee the appearance of that woman ,she looked old mid 60th rough and wearing miniskirt and fishnet stockings ,
    a procedure like a freak show ,
    Oliver was smirking ,another social worker who was present kept smiling friendly over to me
    not knowing at the time ,that all her good intention to help was twisted to disadvance her being dyslexic

    someone else written a statement to discredit me ,afterwards she apologized and told me that she could not write or read

    then I taggled a Psychiatrist from Ormond street Dr De Jong who suggested in her statement to wean the child yes wean like a dog ,only when requested the report ,
    the head of Ormond street confirmed that nothing is held in the system to me or my daughter , or any other names giving to her connected to my case

    a young student to social services was removed as she gave me the info that my child had no education over 48 weeks and was placed into a project school catered for autism when she has no autism ,that is child abuse

    our own MP Benyon does not respond will not want not

    our parish priest made redundant after he spoken on my behalf with the WBC ,
    in total 4 social worker fired and 2 agency workers to the WBC ,2 solicitor 1 resigned another investigated and barred ,
    every other Solicitor or Barrister refused or have no capacity to assist
    my records are withheld and denied to me over 3 years

    amendment /release orders from the Foreign and Commonwealth office and from the International Human Rights are ignored and so far I have 7 case numbers to one and the same case ,
    causing disturbance and malfunction in the admin to Olivers case ,he who imposed as a High COURT JUDGE on the 8th of January 2019 at 10am in room 25,
    to a new case number RG 18C01567 (in correct name to my child ,only there is no order to start with in my child’s name wrong or right so we start all over again )

    directional transferred on the 3rd December 2018 by Judge Moradifar to OLIVER
    there is no script available
    neither any details showing on that date to any hearing (which covered Oliver)

    strangely the hearing was arranged by WBC social services , who called before christmas via withheld number without name
    a comment were made we spoken before yes alright I have spoken to many , ad all had a name this one did not gave the name

    neither found it important to send a doc or email to verify then after christmas another call with a fake email pretending to be from the High court
    stating same arrangement to court this time the email did not displayed date and time
    when called the admin it was Holborn not Strand ,very tricky but hearing is at Strand

    also the original case number RG16C00288 was appealed on same day of order made 8th of November 2016 and finally in November 2018 received an answer that time has elapsed

    between the time I had two more case numbers giving and as you see number 4 to the High court ,only it is NOT A HIGH COURT CASE NUMBER
    so yes to many case numbers to one and same case which were jumping kangaroo jumps

    and all redirected to Oliver , thought made many attempts to the High court to have them deal with my case only admin seem to do the blockage ,…

  31. From all reports and accounts, Jeffrey Epstein is a nipple tweaker…or likes it to be done to him rather than DIY like Oliver…..Birds of a feather…….

  32. To: Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police.
    To: The Senior Investigating Detective, Thames Valley Police.

    Ref: WM HHJ Simon OLIVER, Reading County Court.

    Dear Sir’s,

    Part 1
    Freddy Cutts, Reading County Court, was in September 2014 the civil judgment writer, order writer.

    Part 2
    Courts and Tribunals Judicial Appointments [Royal Courts of Justice] Strand, London WC2A 2LL
    9 August 2019
    Dear Mr Lawrence
    HHJ Simon Oliver is not currently authorised under s9(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981
    as amended by the Crime and Courts Act 2013 to hear cases in the Queen’s Bench Division.
    However, he was temporarily authorised in 2014
    Best Wishes
    Judicial Appointments Team

    Part 3
    HHJ Simon Oliver’s temporarily authorisation is of particular interest.

    Part 4
    Civil restraint order and Extended civil restraint order
    If you do not comply with a Civil restraint order and/or a Extended civil restraint order,
    you are at risk of imprisonment or fine, or your assets may be seized. A very effective tool
    to silence a victims at Reading and Slough County Courts.

    Part 5
    Solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks,
    attempted to have placed upon me a Civil restraint order. The action was stopped and the
    District Judge ordered not to have any further involvement in my case. Solicitor Susan
    Andrew’s was ordered to file a new statement explaining how BP Collins Solicitors were
    in possession of my stolen documents! Solicitor Susan Andrews named the source of my
    stolen documents as her client !

    Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Head of Specialist of Specialist Operations, Thames
    Valley Police, had know in 2004 that BP Collins Solicitors had disclosed some of my stolen
    documents that were Crime Log as stolen with Thames Valley Police. Det Supt Gill Wootton
    also knew the identity of the thief, prior to me having Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds of
    pounds placed upon me in adverse cost and inferences because I could not produce my stolen
    documents.

    It may not be in some Thames Valley Police interest to investigate HHJ Simon Oliver as it
    will uncover the actions of several other police officer’s.

    Leonard Lawrence
    10 August 2019

  33. Hi Len I have been sharing this site and posting a refernce to your plight to a retired police officer and others. I hope this is ok? I also came across a few people who connected with you years ago whom have said they will reconnect with you, all still fighting their own battles. Could you re post your email address if that’s ok? so people can come and find it. Thanks

  34. I would like to make a suggestion, and I think if everyone complies, it will bear dividends. Everyone should post the name or names of all judges and ALL COURT OFFICIALS who have been involved in their cases. They will find names in their court documents. Also details of whether or not their cases were also heard in courts other than Reading County Court, and who was involved at each court. Let’s get a full picture here of what is going on with these gansters.

  35. PS Including lawyers who worked against them, social workers, etc. Let’s identify who is involved with these rackets.

  36. Everyone might like to know that there is a website where you can ask Freedom of Information Requests. The benefit of using this sight is that it is all public and transparent, which makes it harder for them to wriggle out of answering you. Furthermore, if they don’t answer you, it is an easy way to escalate it, and the website helps you to do it. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com It makes it easy to share the results with other people because you can just send them the link. Also, they can sign up on the site to follow the FOIs individually.

  37. There is no statute of limitations on criminal acts. Will you please share with us the names of the Thames Valley Police officers who refused to investigate?

  38. To: Anonymous August 10, 2019 at 9:57 pm

    My email address for this site: bpc1368@gmail.com
    My mobile phone number for this site: 07707 758952

    Some of my files had been held by this person Lord Justice Adrian Fulford !!

    In February 2013 the then Mr Justice Adrian Fulford had upheld a decision by Master Basil Yoxall,
    Queens Bench Division, not to disclose my files to the Court of Protection and Court of Appeal.!
    Puzzling, given that Mrs Justice Pauffley had instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case
    to the Court of Appeal and another senior judge had instructed that my files be sent to the Court
    of Protection and an appeal filed.

    Not so long ago I returned home from Buckfast Abbey, part of an active Benedictine monastery
    to find that my files once held by Master Basil Yoxall and Lord Justice Adrian Fulford had been
    placed on my living room table with a book. The book was signed SEMPER OCCULTUS (NI)

    The files contained Court of Protection Medical Certificates. A photograph of these files was
    handed to the Attorney General The Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC MP last October 2018.

    I have been subjected to a lot of bullying. However I now have the Deputy Chief Constables
    Thames Valley Police mobile phone number: 0x7xx 3×4 x4x.

    Best Wishes
    Leonard Lawrence

  39. From: Leonard Lawrence

    WHAT HAS BEEN OCCURRING IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA ?

    Summary.

    Chief Constable John Campbell and Assistant Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames Valley Police and
    others were advised today of the following:

    The name and contact details of barrister Dominic Thomas George BRAZIL

    Barrister Dominic BRAZIL was active in the Thames Valley Area between 2004 and 2013.
    Maybe earlier than 2004 and possibly after 2013

    On the 16 April 2012 HHJ Simon OLIVER was advised by barrister Dominic BRAZIL that solicitor Helen
    Mary CLIFT had, prior to joining the office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts, briefed him
    with her Family Law Cases.

    I am advised that solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT had worked at Blandy & Blandy LLP Solicitors, Reading.
    Brenda Long, Partner and Chairman, Blandy & Blandy LLP, memory was faded when asked.

    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT having left Reading went to work in the office of the Official Solicitor to
    the Senior Courts.

    In 2015 the Senior Investigator, Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police informed
    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police of the following:
    (It is now known that Det Insp Tyrrell was being directed by Det Supt Gill Wootton. Wasn’t he Gill !! )

    In 2004 barrister Dominic BRAZIL had me placed under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical
    by a private psychiatrist from Cygnet Health Care. Thereafter Dominic BRAZIL had me placed under the
    the jurisdiction of Helen Mary CLIFT at the office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT instructed barrister Nicholas Allen (now Mr Recorder Nicholas Allen QC)
    to act on my behalf. Barrister Nicholas Allen appear’s to have been good friends with Dominic Brazil.
    Barrister Nicholas Allen writes in one email: Dear Dominic, as requested I have simply accepted all
    the tracked changes without checking.

    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT allowed the barrister and solicitors to go on a revenue gathering exercise.
    On the 4 August 2005 Helen Mary CLIFT allowed barrister Dominic BRAZIL to place a £10,000 cost
    order on me following an application lasting about 5 minutes.

    However, I have a letter from Richard Anelay QC [Deputy High Court Family Judge] and Mr Brazil’s
    former Head of Chambers at 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers. Mr Richard Anelay QC having questioned
    Mr Brazil, Mr Brazil has admitted that I had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection.
    Mr Brazil blames the judiciary of the South East Circuit for his actions ?? Nonsense.

    The now Deputy Director, Operations, Cabinet Office instructs me to ask Mr Brazil why he never disclosed
    my protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Barrister: Dominic Thomas George Brazil can be found at the following address:

    Barrister: Dominic Thomas George Brazil
    Stephens Road Chambers
    84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

  40. Unfortunately the legal industry involves all of them. There is no group involved except one and its the LEGAL INDUSTRY! The lawyers always work for the judge and not their client. The lawyers will always have the best interests of their bank account at heart. Ask yourself this question, if these judges and lawyers are going in and out of court everyday, they know each other and they are favoured towards particular types. Judges and lawyers lie and the public tells the truth. The entire legal industry is a gangster

  41. they do refuse to answer questions because its all government run. You can try to ask questions but if they don’t like the questions, they will make excuses or refuse to disclose the information. A request was made to enquire how many complaints have been made against Mr Simon Oliver but they refused to disclose the information.

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/judge_simon_oliver_corruption_an

  42. Anyone telling the truth, especially about senior police officers at Thames Valley who refused to investigate a crime, shouldn’t be afraid to name names.

  43. The name of the officer was DC Harmon. I did not catch her first name. However, her manager confirmed that they will not be taking any action and his name was inspector Varley. The officers are based at Redding police station. How many of us have had police refuse to investigate crimes. Oliver gets an investigation simply because he does not like what he reads on the internet about himself! Which happens to be true by the way.

  44. Thank you. It happens a lot with very serious crimes. The most corrupt cops are above inspector level, and we must start naming those who block investigations. We can find out if they are working for organised crime.

  45. To: Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton Thames Valley Police
    Head of Force Intelligence and Specialist Operations Department,
    Includes the Serious and Organised Crime Unit (SOCU)
    Dedicated Surveillance & Force Proactive Teams and Economic Crime Unit

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Gill,

    Are you going to tell Chief Constable John Campbell and Assistant Chief Constable Jason Hogg or should I ?

    I wonder how many victims have served prison sentences, or still are in prison, as a result of Det. Supt. Gill
    Wootton not disclosing evidence. Det. Supt. Wootton you had known in 2004 that some of my stolen documents
    had been disclosed by solicitor Graeme S. Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors, Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd, Gerrards
    Cross, SL9 8ES. Det. Supt. Wootton you also knew the source of my stolen documents to BP Collins Solicitors.
    Their client !

    However, BP Collins Solicitor client had sworn an affidavit filed at Slough County Court that I did not work at all.
    Had Det. Supt. Wootton recovered my stolen documents from BP Collins Solicitors, or from their client, charges
    of perjury could follow. Thereafter BP Collins Solicitors proceeded to have place upon me Tens of Thousands
    of Pounds in legal fees, adverse costs and adverse inferences. The sum has now reached over £400,000.

    When in 2015 City of London Police identified offences of Fraud, Perjury and other more serious offences
    and requested the Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police, to take a statement from me instructions were given by Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell TV Police to Neil Blackhurst, Devon and Cornwall
    Police not to take a statement from me. Those instructions came from his Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton.

    Asst. Ch. Con. Tim De Meyer, Det. Insp. Gavin Tyrrell, Det. Insp. Nicholas Watts, Val Copping etc etc etc etc
    ‘useful idiots’ or ‘expert idiots’ NO. USED YES !!

    WOULD YOU PLEASE UP DATE THAMES VALLEY POLICE COMPUTER WITH THE FOLLOWING:

    Dr Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220):

    “At this point the tenor of the presention changed dramatically from calm, logical science to the harrowing
    story of one pilot, Len Lawrence…

    His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that
    he was not mentally unfit.

    What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of the symptoms
    following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him data concerning
    his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle those culpable”.

  46. Thats a good idea. Well done. It is no wonder when people speak up, the police immediately find resources to come and silence them by any means necessary. The police have their own organised crime network and it involves Judges, Lawyers, Freemasons and large employers. Never confuse street gangs, Europeans and Mafia networks as being the only form of organised crime. In the UK, we have a government funded one as well! Its called the Ministry of Justice

  47. ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS responded and wrote
    ref to
    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/thames-valley-police-officer-killed-095700231.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=fb

    Looks like Karma is ,
    Thames Valley Police are known for most corrupt ,nothing is a surprise thought there are two sides to every story !

    Question is ,
    was it a burglary investigation ?
    as usual police do random ransack homes ,followed by remove and punish vulnerable families for nothing ? via interferences and breaches into dataset

    Thames Valley Police is known for it, over 18 years a support group fight bad cops ,
    supporting victims of falsely accuse who loosing all under a malicious prosecution? via Thames Valley Police

    to be fair as read in article , police do a job like everyone else ,of course there are average people when the Uniform comes off doing a job ,

    sadly the good cops have no say and the bad often misuse that Uniform
    to setup Burglary then turn quick to their advantage in term is under investigations reality is seizing up ,

    unfortunately , too many people have bad experience with that Unit control by a greedy Judge who makes up fabricated cases just read of what victims stating is shocking

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

    this Judge use the Thames Valley police to gain documents ,homes etc of vulnerable people

    Sulhamstead itself is well respected occupied by wealthy people even the police college is close by ,… it tells a story itself ,most properly people fought back , and accidental death to Mr Harper who were pushing the boundary
    hence our condulgene towards Mr Harper RIP

    may the truth be revealed !

    message to the NEWSPAPER print real stories of real victims ,

    one police man does not equal death to teenagers in prison who were innocent, children who died via unlawfully removal via Thames Valley Police !

    continue THE MISUSE OF LAW to steal children , gangrapes to innocent children , set up to drugs abuse instigate burglary , stealing elderly homes ,
    justice is to be done and people will fight back

    good advice remove that crazy Johnson he is a loose cannon to make a mockery of this country

  48. Blackstone chambers London asked me to give Mr Oliver £20,000 loan prior to my hearing. My barrister told me this is how the business works. I was told that I cannot challenge it even if i lose

  49. Thank you for this. People exposing names of all involved is the only way we will stop this.

  50. TVP NEED TO STOP POLICING THE INTERNET AND START POLICING THE STREETS AND OUR CORRUPT LEGAL SYSTEM WITH JUDGES AND LAWYERS BOTH INVOLVED IN IN RACKETEERING.

  51. As far as I know, there was mass resignations in his local Freemason office as a result of the shite he brought down upon it.

  52. Deal All,
    Upon further consideration and investigation, we have decided to publish the six names that Simon Oliver wants imprisoned under false charges and by any means necessary by Thames valley Police. two of the names have been anonymised at the individuals request as they do not want their names publicised but the remaining four are going to be published and are as follows
    1. Gary Burns
    2. Thomas Hanlon
    3. Leonard Lawrence
    4. Daniel White
    We believe other names also exist and we will be working with the members of the public in order to determine who else is at risk.
    Thank you for reading from the team at judges behaving badly

  53. Detective Superintendent Stan Gilmour
    From Aug 2019 Head of Protecting Vulnerable People at Thames Valley Police
    Former Reading Area Commander

    Fax to: BP Collins Solicitors 01753 889851 at 16:15 31- MAR-2005.
    From Goverment Legal Services to solicitor Graeme FRASER and BP Collins Solicitors

    Dr Tony feels that Mr Lawrence is even more vulnerable than when he last saw him.
    He will not be able to rationally argue his case.

    Detective Superintend Gilmour,
    I have a letter from The Deputy Director, Operations, Cabinet Office.
    Barrister Dominic BRAZIL has admitted that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection.
    Barrister Dominic BRAZIL was instructed by the two solicitors below:
    Susan V. ANDREWS and Graeme S. FRASER

    I am to ask solicitor Graeme FRASER and solicitor Susan ANDREWS why they never
    disclosed my protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Solicitor Graeme Fraser
    Partner & Head of Family Department at OGR Stock Denton
    2nd Floor, Winston House 2 Dollis Park London N3 1HF. Tel: (0)208 349 0321
    info@ogrstockdenton.com

    Solicitor Susan Andrews
    Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors
    Collins House 32-38 Station Road, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire. SL9 8EL
    sue.andrews@bpcollins.co.uk

    Yours sincerely
    Leonard Lawrence

    Your item was collected from **Kidlington DO** at **24-07-2019**.
    Signed for by: TVP HQ

  54. I accused judge Simon Oliver of corruption many times over the last few years and next thing I know that Thames valley Police do a raid at my home and start looking for anything that can incriminate me or my family. The warrant they supplied was a photocopy with an electronic signature of a judge and it was a Sunday morning so I could not get the court order verified. my wife and two children were held at ransom by Thames valley Police force to me to admit that I had drugs at home which was your personal use. Tvp said to me that if I do not admit to the drugs being mine then my wife and children will go to prison and into care. I admitted that the drugs were mine but when it went to court, I challenged it that I was forced to admit it. 9 months later I was released because the jury came back and found me not guilty. This entire ordeal lasted nearly a whole year and all because I accused Simon Oliver of corruption when this fat bastard is corrupt. I’m sure that TVP has a completely separate department that deals with Simon Oliver’s requests and propositions to target innocent people with false allegations.

  55. We are sorry that you went through what you did. Oliver has been accused on a substantive scale of corruption with Thames Valley Police and the Berkshire Freemasons. It goes to tell you how many other innocent people were forced to admit to allegations which were not true simply because this so called man of a judge is working against the public. Oliver will find any excuse to justify his behaviour in any way he can. We all know what he does but his time is now up. He has been blackmailing, colluding, stealing, lying and even murdering in one way or another to get what he wants, either for himself or one of his freemason friends.

  56. It’s like watching a movie. You would not think this was happening in real life!

  57. Hi
    I made a freedom of information request by several government departments including Thames valley police and the police commissioners office. They all responded back and said they do not have any information on Simon Oliver. However, the Ministry of Justice has refused to respond back and it’s been over 2 weeks but they have around 28 days to acknowledge the request but they still have not acknowledged anything yet and time is running out but I conclude that there is a cover up going on over here which the ministry of Justice is doing deliberately. So therefore, the comments on the site must be true. how was very sad that the Ministry of Justice is part of the problem and not part of the solution.
    Regards
    Sean Bradfield

  58. Thank you very much for the information,

    If you do a simple Google search, you will see that there have been 4 judges that have been distributed on the internet as taking bribes. This is American Judge Jimmy Galindo who pleaded guilty to taking bribes to secure government contracts, American judges Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella were both convicted for the kids for cash scandal. And let’s not forget our very own nipple tweaking British judge Simon Oliver who has openly been taking bribes but is still at large as an unchallenged criminal because of government connections! This is why there is so much distrust in our government. We must say that these are only the judges that have been spoken about and these four judges represent all judges in general! There is not an honest one amongst them.
    Regards

  59. Write a follow up letter to them, reminding them when their reply is due. Otherwise, they will say they never received it and start the 20 days all over again.

  60. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NRzE7NKdDO8J:https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/protection-for-contempt-of-court-mother-ludicrously-over-the-top-35368553.html+&cd=29&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-b-d

    John Hemming said reporters should be able to name a woman involved in a family court case

    January 15 2017

    A campaigner has criticised a family court judge who ruled that the identity of a Polish woman found to be in contempt of court after her teenage daughter was taken into care must remain a world-wide secret.

    Judge Simon Oliver has barred journalists inside and outside the jurisdiction of England and Wales from revealing the woman’s name in reports of her case.

    He said his aim was to protect the woman’s daughter – who has been at the centre of family court proceedings – and ensure that the youngster’s name did not emerge in an information jigsaw.

    But former Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming, who campaigns for improvements in the family justice system, said reporters should be able to name the woman.

    He said the reporting restriction order would be impossible to enforce abroad and did not give enough weight to the public’s right to know.

    Judge Oliver imposed the global identity ban after a public family court hearing in Reading, Berkshire, on Friday.

    He concluded that the woman had wrongly revealed detail of her daughter’s circumstances in an interview with a Polish journalist.

    Information had emerged on the internet and evidence showed that publication had distressed the girl, he said.

    The judge said he feared that the woman would generate more publicity and cause her daughter further emotional harm.

    He said if the woman spoke to foreign journalists information could rebound to England via the internet.

    Social services bosses at Oxfordshire County Council said the woman was told not to discuss her daughter’s case and accused her of being in contempt.

    Council lawyers said they did not want to see the woman jailed but wanted her to stop making detail of her daughter’s case public.

    Judge Oliver told the woman that he had the power to jail her for being in contempt.

    But he imposed no punishment, saying he thought she had suffered enough by losing contact with her daughter.

    “The reporting restriction order is ludicrously over the top,” said Mr Hemming.

    “Judges should not make orders they cannot enforce – and how can this possibly be enforced abroad?

    “This woman has been found guilty of contempt at a public court hearing.

    “She could have been jailed.

    “The public have a right to know the names of people convicted of wrongdoing in public courts. ”

    Mr Hemming added: “The judge is worried about the effects of publicity on the child – but the order itself will generate publicity.

    He went on: “This woman should never have been facing the threat of jail anyway. She’s a mother who’s angry because her child has been taken away – not a criminal.

    “Surely social services managers can manage these situations without having to threaten jail.”

    Judge Oliver said there was a need for transparency in family courts.

    He said world-wide reporting restriction orders were unusual b ut he wanted to protect the teenager.

  61. Dear Len,

    HHJ Simon Oliver use of: CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS AND EXTENDED RESTRAINT ORDERS

    Ref: Your FOIA reply about HHJ Simon Oliver being temporarily appointed as a deputy Judge
    of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court in 2014.

    This is not true and the Ministry of Justice knew this; they prohibited such an appointment by
    initiating Section 9 (1) and Section 9 (4) of the Senior Courts Act 1981.

    I am progressing the matter.

    I wonder if this information would be useful to those threatened with extended Civil Restraint
    Orders and those with Civil Restraint Orders.

    Regards xxxxxxx

  62. HHJ SIMON OLIVER: CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS AND EXTENDED CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS.

    They have proven to be very successful and makes it impossible to progress your case !

    Justice.Gov N19A Extended civil restraint order (09.12)
    If you do not comply with the order, you may be held in contempt of court and imprisoned or fine,
    or your assets may be seized.

    Let me give a hypothetical example one of six !
    A patient with a neurological illness, like Cerebral palsy, is in a residential care home in Berkshire.
    The patients elderly parents live 150 miles away and cannot afford the travel costs to regularly visit
    their son/daughter. They wish to relocate their son/daughter closer to home.

    Thames Valley Police have no objections to the vulnerable patient being move closer to their parents.

    An application is made at the Court of Protection at Reading County Court for the relocation of their
    vulnerable son/daughter to be closer to their parents. The case is heard by HHJ Simon Oliver sitting
    as a Court of Protection judge.

    The application is heard by HHJ Simon Oliver in secret. The public are not allowed into the hearing.
    The application is refused.
    To silence the applicants (The parents) The Judge issues a Civil Restraint Order.
    If the parent does not comply with the Civil Restraint Order they face imprisonment or fine, or their
    assets seized.

    Who win’s ?
    The Berkshire care home where the vulnerable patient is forced to live, whilst generating revenue
    for the owners of the care-home..

    Regards
    Leonard Lawrence

    P.S.
    Solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
    attempted to obtain a CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER against me ! Thankfully it was stopped. I had a letter
    from the Chief Executive, Office of the Public Guardian, following the intervention of the then Secretary
    of State for Justice.

  63. This ties in with elderly people being visited by social services and declared to be ‘mentally incapacitated’. Against their will, they are put into care homes. Many MPs have shares in private nursing homes. The councils seize the homes and assets of the elderly and liquidate them to provide monies for (a) the care homes and (b) for themselves, the courts, and the lawyers (for administration). It is a racket, and very often the family is denied guardianship. This is happening on an industrial scale in the UK.

  64. The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority

    Final Report on Leonard Lawrence regarding:
    BP Collins Solicitors, 32-38 Station Road, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire SL9 8EL

    There is evidence to show that BP Collins Solicitors (solicitors Susan V. Andrews, Graeme S. Fraser, and
    several others) was aware of the existence of three (Court of Protection) CP3 certificates at the relevant
    time.

    There is further evidence including a letter dated 22 February 2005 that BP Collins was aware that medical
    evidence relating to the customers state of mind had not been been filed at Court.

    BP Collins held a medical report dated 23 November 2004 confirming that the customer lacked the mental
    capacity to manage and administer his property and affairs.

    RDG (Solicitors) notified BP Collins on the 4 March 2005 of the need to refer to the Court of Protection
    when a party lacked capacity and that matters could not be concluded without the involvement of the
    Court of Protection.

    End of Law Society summary.
    Regards
    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————
    NO SECRETS

    Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Head Specialist Operations, Thames Valley Police,
    Detective Superintendent Claire Armes, Force Intelligence Officer, Devon Cornwall Police.

    Email: Thames Valley Police to Devon and Cornwall Police

    Disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.

    This is all connected with a case were a large number of airline pilots received brain damage from the
    ingress of organophosphates into aircraft cabins. Mr Lawrence is such a victim and has received brain
    damage.

  65. I have requested an internal review of the cover up response i reveived from MoJ. Here it is.

    Dear Rasul, Nazir (JCIO),

    I have received your request and i was concerned that it shows a cover up. I am therefore asking you to relook at my request under the following

    1. Can you please give me the outcome for question 1s answer from Judicial HR about Judge Simon Oliver being a Freemason.

    2. Relating to complaints held on file against Judge Simon Oliver, you state you cannot disclose this under section 44(2) of the FOIA. Can you clarify what section of this you are specifically referring to as i have read this section and it does not state anything to the effect and why my request has been refused. Can you refer to each of the questions i have asked and state for each one why it has been refused under section 44(2)?

    3. Complaints against Judge Simon Oliver has been refused under section 44(2). Please can you refer to which area of this section you are referring to as it does not appear to show what you are referring to but just mention section 44(2). I have read this section and it does not state this information is exempt and certainly shouldn’t be if the allegations involve bribery.

    4. Question 4 was not answered but a link to another site was sent which is not clear. I requested what is Judge Simon Olivers salary? This usually follows with a number. Can you tell me what the salary is? As Mr Oliver is a public official and his salary is based on taxpayers money, it’s a sensible request to what his salary is because he has been accused of bribery on a grand scale.

    5. Question 5 referred back to question 2s answers but does not answer the question. Complaints against Judge Simon Oliver has been refused under section 44(2). Please can you refer to which area of this section you are referring to as it does not appear to show what you are referring to but just mention section 44(2). I have read this section and it does not state this information is exempt and certainly shouldn’t be if the allegations involve sexual requests. Please re-state?

    6. You state to question 6 that Judge Dimon Oliver has not made any orders prior to 2015 as a Court of Protection judge. Unfortunately, this is not correct as early as 2012, Judge Simon Oliver was making orders. A specific individual who went public called Leonard Lawrence said that he received an order. Can the MoJ clarify therefore wherethere orders were made after 2012? I have evidence that shows that Mr Oliver was making orders? Therefore this constitutes to fraud. Please clarify?

    7. Question 7 refers back to section 44(2). Complaints against Judge Simon Oliver has been refused under section 44(2). Please can you refer to which area of this section you are referring to as it does not appear to show what you are referring to but just mention section 44(2). I have read this section and it does not state this information is exempt and certainly shouldn’t be if the allegations involve bribery. Pleasr clarify

    8. Answer to question 8 is accepted by me.

    Based on the answers given by the MoJ, several compalints and allegations are made against Judge Simon Oliver which go nowhere so therefore his conduct continues in the courtroom. If there is a cover up going on where Judge Simon Olivernis being protected, then it would be approprite to have an inquiry launched against the MoJ as justice is unparamount in the UK

    Yours sincerely,

    Sean Bradfield

  66. Judge oliver implied he wanted to sleep with me for a judgement in my favour. I reported it to jcio and they came back and said i was lying. Apparently sex requests is not misconduct and just his personal preference. What a nob

  67. The only people that lie are these lawyers, judges and the JCIO. All we want is justice in the courts, what we really get is a nipple tweaking, rent boy using, bribe accepting, sex requesting, paedophile, Social Services colluding, Disclosure and Barring Service colluding, Thames Valley Police colluding corrupt TURD!!

    Now we all know why our country is a laughing stock of the entire world. If Oliver behaved like this with a politician in the courts, then you would see where he would go. We the public are obviously not important enough for our government.

  68. ASSISTANCE NEEDED
    IS SECTION 39, 40, 41 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND POLICE ACT 2001 STILL VALID ?

    On the helpful advice of the CPS Reading I recently emailed the Policy Division, CPS HQ London
    for confirmation whether the following legislation is still valid:

    Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001
    Section 39
    Section 40
    Section 41

    The Policy Division, CPS HQ London, have refused to answer my question.

    Thereafter, I wrote and posted by recorded delivery a letter addressed directly to Sue Hemming,
    Director of Legal Services, Crown Prosecution Services, CPS HQ London, this time asking Sue
    Hemming whether the following legislation is still valid:

    Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001
    Section 39
    Section 40
    Section 41

    No reply so far from Sue Hemming, Director of Legal Services, CPS HQ London !

    Last October 2018 I met with the Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC (The Attorney General)
    The Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC was shown:
    1). Documents the police are not allowed to view.
    2). Briefed on His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.
    3). Shown a special ID Card endorsed by the National Police Chiefs Council.

    Recently I was contacted by the Office for the Under Secretary of State for Justice.
    See below:

    To: Len lawrence
    Subject: Re:…..
    Dear Len,
    Do let me know if you feel that xxxxx is able to assist directly.
    With kind regards,
    xxxxxxx
    Chief of Staff,
    Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice

    Time to ask The Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC for some assistance with Sue Hemming.

    Finally,
    A senior officer from Thames Valley Police has contacted me with information on my case
    (but off the record). He also gave his name and rank. The information has been found to be
    accurate. Land Registry Form MH4 was used to remove the caution on my home from the
    Land Registry, without the knowledge of the Court of Protection. The barrister Dominic
    Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers and BP Collins Solicitors may wish to provide an
    explanation.

    Likewise, the very recently retired Detective Superintendent Gillian Vanessa Wootton
    also has some explaining to do !! (Det. Supt. Gill Wootton, Thames Valley Police)

    Regards,
    Leonard Lawrence

  69. Hahahahaha…

    On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 17:07 judges behaving badly – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIM

  70. What is the name of Oliver’s company, please? In what year did you have dealings with Freddy Cutts? Do you or anyone here have any documents that have Cutts name on them please? Is he also a magistrate?

  71. What is the name of the company that you are referring to please? Is it Core Assets? Can you please give us any details that you might have? There is a racket going on with ELDERLY people too. Councils put them into nursing homes and sell their houses to pay for it. Many MPs have financial interests in these nursing homes. The rest of the money goes on lawyers, courts, council expenses. If you can supply the name of Oliver’s company, it would be great because something CAN be done about it. Any further details about your case also. Thanks.

  72. Can you give any more details re social workers and their companies, please? Without that, it would be pretty hard to check out Companies House. We need names to check for. It will be very helpful if you can give some of the names please. It is important.

  73. Some of the links on your website are broken. I think the videos are still there though, but I could not hear them. It might be my computer re the video sound, so I will check, but the other links do not work.

  74. Hi Rob
    What is the name of Oliver’s company, please? Do you know who any of the other directors are please?

  75. Can you please tell us the names of some of the companies that the social workers have?

  76. Government computer systems can be shared. For example, doctors sometimes put false information about someone, deliberately. In one case that I know of, a surgeon botched an operation and the victim complained. So he entered (or had another doctor enter) false information, stating that the patient was mad or mentally ill. So, in this particular case, it seems that the Metropolitan Police had access to this information. Perhaps it is shared with police. Everywhere this man went, police were always stopping him in his vehicle FOR NO VALID REASON, and talking to him as if he were a psychiatric case. Nothing he did would defend him from anyone as they had falsely labelled him as a nutter. We know they are labeling parents as mentally incapacitated, in order to take their children. I was told that the ADOPTION INDUSTRY in the UK is worth about 2 billion pounds. The UK is the only country in Europe that can take people’s children FOR PERMANENT ADOPTION without the parents’ consent.

  77. What type of clerk is he because the Justices Clerk is a lady?

    Sindlesham is the Berkshire Freemasons. Are you sure it is the name of a company used for Foster care?

  78. What type of clerk is he, because the Justices Clerk is a lady?

    Sindlesham is the Berkshire Freemasons. Are you sure it is the name of a company used for Foster care?

  79. The first one is the Freemasons. The others look like his alumni friends. Someone on here said he owns a foster care company What type of clerk is he because the Justices Clerk is a lady?

    Sindlesham is the Berkshire Freemasons. Are you sure it is the name of a company used for Foster care?

  80. Is he just an orginary pen-pusher type of clerk or does he have a proper title or designation? Is he still there?

  81. You may be right but you don’t KNOW that. It would need an investigation by HMRC. Has one been requested and are police still investigating Oliver or has it been kicked into the long grass? Ian Dyson is with City of London Police. Why would they have been investigating this and not Thames Valley or the National Crime Agency? Is the file still open?

  82. ok thanks. What was he doing at the time, and which court was he in? Was he behind the counter? Do you remember the exact date and time? I have reasons for asking.

  83. That would be great. Thanks. If anyone has any documents with his name on it, it would be even better.

  84. CORE ASSETS comes under the umbrella of CORE ASSETS Group Lmited:
    Core Assets Fostering Limited: Feb 2013-March 2014
    previously named Foster Care Associates Limited: March 2002-Feb 2o13
    previously called Foster Care Associates: 2001-March 2002
    Also linked companies are Number One Park Limited, Nutruis UK Bidco Ltd

    DOROTHY Phebean ATAYI (social worker) born Feb 1964 utilised by that portly bastard Judge Simon OLIVER at various secret court hearings in READING COUNTY COURT via CAFCASS, Oxford Road in READING using CORE ASSETS at their then base in Woodley in Reading for government funded supervised contact sessions, etc is/was appointed as a Director on 17 November 2009 at a separate business with presumably her husband MICHAEL ATAYI called: M-D ATAYI AND SONS LIMITED Company number 07078062 operating from their home address at 24 Devon Avenue, Twickenham, United Kingdom, TW2 6PW. Company Profit End of November 2012 = £23,278. Company Profit End of November 2013 = £23,340.
    DOROTHY ATAYI (social worker number SW39157) subsequently obtained work via CAFCASS in UXBRIDGE and is now obtaining work via CAFCASS in HIGH WYCOMBE.
    FREDDY CUTTS, the portly bastards clerk has been witnessed sat in various secret court hearings at READING COUNTY COURT.

  85. Hi, the website got trashed because police forced me to edit the site to remove some bits. They had stolen all of my computers, so editing this huge site using notepad from a computer in the local library was a nightmare.

  86. Thank you for this information. I cut and paste below some additional information about the fostering and adoption racketeering in the UK:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/07/fostering-children-is-big-business/
    Fostering children is big business

    Christopher Booker

    7 May 2016 • 4:23pm
    The number of children in state care stands at its highest since 1989
    Credit: Alamy

    As the number of children in state “care” stands at its highest level since the 1989 Children Act – last year it reached 69,540 in England alone – not one single aspect of our “child protection” system fails to raise disturbing questions: from the bizarre excuses concocted by social workers for removing children from their families in the first place, and the willingness of too many judges to endorse them, to the often horrendous experiences of children while they are in “care”. But one aspect of this system attracting rather closer scrutiny has been the way “fostering” has in recent years become a highly lucrative industry.

    “The National Fostering Agency, founded by two social workers, was sold in 2012 for £130 million to a private investment firm”

    Most people would be startled to learn how much of the child protection sector is now dominated by a handful of companies, most of them run by ex-social workers. These companies are paid huge sums by local authorities to make their fostering arrangements. Several have become such big business that they are traded by private equity funds.

    A meticulously researched survey by the Corporate Watch website has tracked down the financial details of the seven largest of these companies.

    The biggest, Foster Care Associates, is still largely owned by two former foster carers, through a holding company which in 2013 paid its shareholders £9.2 million. In 2014, on an income of £127 million, it paid its owners £7 million, and its highest paid director earned in salary and other benefits £406,000.

    The National Fostering Agency (NFA), founded by two social workers, was sold in 2012 for £130 million to a private investment firm owned by an array of bankers and accountants, which also owned a chain of steak restaurants and the Groucho Club. In 2015, the NFA was sold on again to another private equity firm. The price was not disclosed, but the first private equity firm announced that it had “more than doubled” its original investment, suggesting that the NFA had been sold for more than £250 million. Income from foster care was shown in the NFA’s 2014 accounts as £94 million, with the owners receiving £14.4 million and the highest paid director £318,112.

    In some ways, the oddest of all the fostering companies analysed by Corporate Watch is Acorn Care, owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension fund. This organisation in 2014 had revenues of £73 million, although only 65 per cent of this appears to be for foster care. This firm, the accounts show, has so far yielded those Canadian teachers a profit of £47 million.
    “A recent FOI request revealed just how much Norfolk County Council pays to the leading fostering agencies: in 2014-15 it gave the NFA £7,861,788”

    All these profits ultimately derive from British taxpayers, on top of the generous sums earned by the carers themselves, employed through local authorities, such as Norfolk county council, which two years ago was advertising pay of £590 a week, or £30,000 a year for each foster child taken.

    With more than 1,100 children in care, Norfolk has one of the highest figures in the country. A recent FOI request revealed just how much it pays to the leading fostering agencies: in 2014-15 it gave the NFA £7,861,788. Yet for two years running the Ofsted inspectors have awarded Norfolk’s children’s services their lowest possible rating, “inadequate”.

    It would be interesting to hear the views of those parents and children caught up in this very strange system.

    AND

    Privatise child protection services, Department for Education proposes

    This article is more than 5 years old
    Experts sound alarm over proposal from Michael Gove’s department to outsource children’s services to private firms

    Letter: Child protection services too important to be privatised

    Patrick Butler, social policy editor

    Fri 16 May 2014 19.31 BST First published on Fri 16 May 2014 19.31 BST
    A letter signed by 37 senior social services figures and published in the Guardian says child protection is too important to be left to the ‘fickleness and failings of the market. Photograph: Linda Nylind for the Guardian

    The power to take children away from their families could be privatised along with other child protection services under controversial plans the government has quietly announced.

    The proposal from Michael Gove’s Department for Education (DfE) to permit the outsourcing of children’s social services in England to companies such as G4S and Serco has alarmed experts. They say profit-making companies should not be in charge of such sensitive family matters, and warn that the introduction of the profit motive into child protection may distort the decision-making process.

    A DfE consultation paper published last month argues that enabling local authorities to outsource children’s social services will encourage innovation and improve outcomes for at-risk youngsters.

    Private providers will allow authorities to “harness third-party expertise” and “stimulate new approaches to securing improvements” for safeguarding services outside “traditional hierarchies”, the document says.

    Professor Eileen Munro, whom Gove commissioned to carry out an independent review of child protection published in 2011, said establishing a market in child protection would create perverse incentives for private companies to either take more children into care or leave too many languishing with dangerous families.

    “It’s a bad idea,” she told the Guardian. “It’s the state’s responsibility to protect people from maltreatment. It should not be delegated to a profit-making organisation.”

    Some 10,600 youngsters were subject to care applications to the family courts in 2013. Another 43,000 were on English council child protection registers in 2013, meaning they were monitored by social workers because they were considered to be at risk of neglect, or sexual, emotional or physical abuse. About 68,000 children were in the care system in England in 2013.

    Separately, a letter published in the Guardian today and signed by 37 senior social services academics led by professor Ray Jones, of Kingston University, warns that child protection is too important to be left to the “fickleness and failings” of the market.

    They say: “England has one of the most successful child protection systems in the world. This is based on strong accountability, stability, continuity, good local partnership working across professionals and agencies, and with experienced and committed professionals and leadership. The intention that private sector organisations such as G4S, Serco, Atos and others should be able to run child protection services causes considerable concern.”

    The critics say the track record of big outsourcing companies such as G4S, which was fined for overcharging on a contract to tag offenders, and Serco, which manipulated results to meet targets on outsourced NHS family doctor services, shows the dangers of introducing the profit element into vital public services.

    Kathy Evans, chief executive of Children England, which represents more than 100 children’s charities, said although there was a need to explore new ways of improving child safeguarding services, profit-making firms were not the answer:

    “Michael Gove must ensure that no commercial company and its shareholders should ever be able to make profit from public spending on child protection. Such an important public function must never be open to the real, or even perceived, risk of being done in the pursuit of profit.”

    Only adoption services – a personal priority for Gove, who was himself adopted – remain exempt from the proposals to introduce market forces into children’s services. By law, councils can only delegate adoption services to non-profit-making registered adoption charities.

    The consultation document suggests that private providers may not be required to register with Ofsted, although it is understood that all aspects of children’s services in an area will be Ofsted-inspected no matter who delivers them. Local authorities will retain political accountability for the safety of children in their area.

    Britain’s biggest child protection charity, the NSPCC, said it was agnostic about who provided safeguarding services, saying the question was about “how good a service is at turning children’s lives around”. But Lisa Harker, its director of strategy, said it was “still looking at the detail to see if there are sufficient checks and balances around service quality”.

    At present, new child protection providers can only be drafted in at the direction of the secretary of state in the context of a major safeguarding failure, such as seen in Doncaster and Birmingham in recent years. This, the DfE argues, is illogical and prevents local authorities from adopting innovative new approaches.

    But Munro, one of the most respected voices in the child protection world, said there were already many examples of local authority services delivering innovative improvements to services. There was a danger that outsourcing to companies with no experience in delivering child protection would undermine existing local partnership arrangements.

    She said: “A private sector company with an eye on the money will not pull its weight in the ‘working together between agencies’ aspect. That rests on goodwill.”

    Tony Hawkhead, chief executive of Action for Children, the UK’s biggest charity provider of children’s services, welcomed the opportunity for outside providers to have the opportunity to address “high levels of failure” in current safeguarding provision. He said: “In this very difficult and intractable area charities are very best placed to to be frontline providers for local authorities.”

    The Local Government Association gave the plan a lukewarm reception. Nick Forbes, vice-chair of the LGA children and young people’s board, said: “It’s clear that in every case of service failure it has been councils with their committed professionals and democratic accountability that have turned the situation around and as yet we are not seeing other organisations stepping forward with the ability to do the tough job of child protection.”

    The DfE said it was responding to demand from councils and there was no requirement for any council to outsource to a private company. “There will be no obligation for councils to take up these freedoms and any that do will still be held accountable by Ofsted. We will take into account all responses to the consultation before setting out next steps.”

    • This article was amended on 19 May 2014 to correct the spelling of Tony Hawkhead’s name.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/16/privatise-child-protection-services-department-for-education-proposes

  87. ‘Spiders Charts’

    Multiple and detailed ‘Spider Charts’ linking all the complicated strands between abusers
    and victims, including relationships, business links, social links, locations visited, police
    links etc.

    ‘Spider Link’
    One such ‘Spider Link’ Goverment Legal Services solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the
    Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts (A former Reading, Berkshire, based solicitor) and barrister
    Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers. Mr Brazil is no longer listed on the 1KBW website.

    Following the hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver on the 16 April 1912, solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson
    Millar LLP had asked me to sign an agreement to pay barrister barrister Dominic Brazil £10,000
    adverse costs for the one hour hearing before WM HHJ Simon OLIVER. I refused. See below:

    James Batey, Senior Technical Authority on Court of Protection Rules, had made it clear in July
    2012 that HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold Court of Protection authorisation. HHJ Simon Oliver
    disregarded James Batey and delivered a judgement on the 30 August 2012. He later denied this
    to Master Meacher at the Civil Court of Appeal, who I was advised telephoned HHJ Simon Oliver.

    The Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police informed Detective Inspector
    Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police of the above. Det Insp Tyrrell
    is now T/Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell (Fraud) City of London Police.

    One other interesting ‘Spiders Link’
    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police was taking his
    instructions directly from his Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Thames Valley Police,
    rather than from his Detective Chief Inspector Darran Hill. Detective Superintendent Gillian
    Vanessa Wootton very recently left Thames Valley Police and is a director of Galvanwise Ltd.
    Gillian Wootton and I have history going back to 2004 that she will not wish to be reminded
    of.

    Special arrangement’s were also put into place by Professional Standards, Thames Valley,
    Police. Headed by Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer. Now Assistant Chief
    Constable- Crime and Criminal Justice, that no Thames Valley Police officer dealt with my
    case. What is not known (at present) is whether Tim De Meyer was being directed by a more
    senior officer within Thames Valley Police.

    W.M. HHJ Simon Oliver is under investigations, not by City of London Police, but by a higher
    authority with more authority/power than the National Crime Agency. Two of whom have
    visited me.

    23 July 2019 Certificate of Posting, signed TV Police HQ OX5 2NX 24 July 2019.
    I was instructed to send a document to Chief Constable John Campbell and Assistant Chief
    Chief Constable Jason Hogg to establish the authentication of a document, a Court of
    Protection, Medical Certificate, dated 27 January 2005, signed by Dr Jeremy Royds, Cygnet
    Healthcare, Godden Green, that had been disclosed by solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT in 2006.

    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT had denied the existence of this Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificate in 2005 !! We are still awaiting a reply from Thames Valley Police.

    Regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    001368

  88. To: Master Maria Bancroft-Rimmer
    Civil Court of Appeal, The Strand, London, United Kingdom

    cc: Lord Justice Adrian Bruce Fulford ! [the judge that silenced me in 2013]

    Master Bancroft-Rimmer,
    Thames Valley Police have kindly also provided me with the correct medical diagnosis!!
    Of the 25 airline pilots tested at the same time as myself in 2005, all had the same diagnoses:
    Chemical Induced Nervous System Injury. (Brain Damage)

    Force Intelligence Officer, Force Headquarters, Thames Valley Police

    Disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited

    Email: From Thames Valley Police to Devon and Cornwall Police.
    Entry 11/06/2013 at 21:05:49 Devon and Cornwall Police

    This is all connected with a case where a large number of airline pilots received
    brain damage from the ingress of organophosphates into aircraft cabins.

    Mr Lawrence is such a victim and has received brain damage.

  89. Dear Len
    Sean made a request to the MoJ under the FOIA relating to Simon Olivers court of protection license. The MoJ got back to him and said that Simon Oliver never passed any judgement before 2015. The link can be found here:
    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/has_judge_simon_oliver_been_disc
    It seems the MoJ is either covering up here (normal for them) or they are very sloppy at record keeping. It might be useful for your case if Simon Oliver passed judgement and was not supposed too.
    Keep us posted!

  90. Dear Len
    Sean made a request to the MoJ under the FOIA relating to Simon Oliver’s court of protection license.
    The MoJ got back to him and said that Simon Oliver never passed any judgement before 2015.

    10 September 2019
    From Leonard Lawrence

    Point one.
    The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) (formerly the Office for Judicial Complaints).
    Former Heads of The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (Dale Simon CBE, Sheridan Greenland
    OBE and Judith Anckron, have known that since 2006 that Court of Protection case where being
    heard in the Thames Valley Area by District Judges who did not hold a Court of Protection
    authorisation. The first record I have is date 24 November 2004. Slough County Court, District
    Judge Susanna Jones and barrister Dominic Thomas George Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk.
    Dominic Thomas George Brazil has now admitted that I had been a Court of Protection patient.

    Point two.
    Prior to the hearing before Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver, on 16 April 2012, four Court of
    Protection, Medical Certificates and several Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 Medical Certificates
    had been had been filed at Reading County Court. Some of these certificates of mental incapacity
    had not been disclosed in the Final Hearing Bundle in April 2005 by BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards
    Cross, Buckinghamshire and solicitor Graeme S. Fraser. Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser is now a partner
    in OGR Stock Denton LLP Solicitors, 2nd Floor, Winston House, 2 Dollis Park, London, N3 1HF

    Richard Anelay Q.C. Head of Chambers, 1 King Bench Walk Chambers. (A Deputy High Court Judge)
    On the 9 September 2010 I received a letter from Richard Anelay QC 1 King Bench Walk Chambers
    informing me that barrister Dominic Thomas George Brazil had advises Richard Anelay QC of the
    following:

    That District Judge Fortgang (Slough County Court) was completely aware that I was a patient
    and subject to the Court of Protection when, at the request of barrister Dominic Thomas George
    Brazil, District Judge Fortgang had placed Hundreds of Thousands of pounds in adverse costs and
    adverse inferences upon me. Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation !!

    All of the above information was available to the Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver prior to the
    hearing at Reading County Court on the 16 April 2012. At his time HHJ Simon Oliver also did not
    hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    Barrister: It does
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.
    Barrister: Yes,

    Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42 Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence
    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.
    Kind regards,
    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice

    The Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver chose to disregard the above and delivered a
    judgement dated 30 August 2012 refusing me permission to appeal.

    Principal Registry of the Family Division Sep 2012
    RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge.
    Dear Mr. Lawrence, I referred the matter to the Senior District Judge, District Judge Waller,
    The appeal application needs to be lodged with the Court of Protection. The file, in the first
    instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection.
    I hope this information assists.
    Kind Regards,

    The Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver chose to disregard the above as well.

    11 February 2013 15:21 Email HHJ Oliver to HMCTS Reading
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    I will need to make an order re-transferring it to Court of Appeal

    The Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver was (according to HMCTS Reading) told by Mrs
    Justice Pauffley to re-transfer my case to the Civil Court of Appeal

    September 2019 and the Court of Appeal has still to receive the re-transferring order from
    The Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver.

    However, The Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver was never going to make the order
    re-transferring order to the Civil Court of Appeal. Why ?

    In October 2012 The Court of Appeal had telephoned HHJ Simon Oliver and advised him
    that the Court of Appeal did not have jurisdiction in my case, it had to go to a High Court
    Family Judge.

    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of the Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police,
    was informed of the above by Neil Blackhust, Senior Investigator, Serious and Organised
    Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police in 2015 !! Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell was
    receiving his instructions from Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton.

    Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames Valley
    Police had sent to them on the 24 July 2019 the Court of Protection, Medical Certificate,
    issued on the 27 January 2005 by Dr Jeremy Royds, Cygnet Health Care, Godden Green.
    This existence had been denied by lawyers.

    I have a court transcript of a Court of Protection hearing heard on the 4 August 2005, at
    Slough County Court. It is now known that District Judge Fortgang did not hold Court of
    Protection !! That did not stop him from putting a £10,000 cost order upon me.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps Thames Valley Police are the subject of an investigation, but not by City of London Police.

  91. Thankyou for being so kind. Didn’t realise I was that popular and happy to assist in anyway. I am aware of the financial gains made from adoption and fostering kids whom are stolen from decent families via the secret family courts and other underhanded shit that goes on behind closed doors including the microphone tamperings by that portly nipple-tweaking bastard !!

  92. You’re very much welcome. You are now part of the family! We are all on the same side here. We have heard from our sources that Simon Olivar is not happy about your comments but he hasn’t got the balls to do anything because of the mass criminal activity he’s involved in and now being exposed online over. Keep sharing this page and the picture on the heading of this page across all social media outlets. The nipple tweaker is very famous across the world right now and he is not happy about it because his business is now being affected. If the microphone tampering was not enough, when people request transcripts of the hearing or even a copy of the recording, regardless of whether they will pay a fee for it or not, they are refused these documents and told that they no longer exist! This is what you call perverting the course of Justice but Oliver has been doing this for so long that it’s normal for him.

  93. Thankyou, we all seem to sing from the same page here. Its a case of Tough-Titty (pardon the pun) that the portly nipple-tweaker doesn’t like hearing THE TRUTH and we know the TRUTH ONLY HURTS those that are dishonest !!

  94. Good afternoon All,

    I have set up a situation where I am gathering as much evidence as possible to make a formal case against HHJ Oliver.
    I cannot reveal my identity here, but Len Lawrence knows who I am. I am among other things, a professional intelligence gatherer.
    I wish all genuine victims of HHJ Oliver to contact me asap with their stories . Whatever they send will be dealt with in the strictest of confidence. Oliver and his cohorts will not know who has sent information till we are ready to expose him en masse and all will need to give written consent to move to the next stage.

    But first we need to get a fantastic portfolio of his crimes and criminal activities (with evidence) together.
    The plan is to gather as much testimony and documentary evidence as possible. Paper evidence that you have been genuinely involved with Oliver in the courts and a victim of legitimate injustice is absolutely key to accepting your name on the file. Unfortunately, we cannot act for you on what you feel is an ‘unfair’ ruling or legal outcome unless it is a legally wrong outcome. We can only add you to the HHJ Oliver criminal activity database if we can show there has been genuine Judicial foul play by Oliver with evidence and/or similar.

    We plan to gather audio/visual testimony from victims. These testimonies will be amalgamated into two documents. Both will be used to bring a case against Oliver.
    Witnesses at this stage may do this without revealing their true ID on camera, , but victims’ names will of course be revealed at a later date (with witness signed consent) to police and other law enforcement agencies when we are fully armed and ready to act.
    There are more plans, but it’s not possible to discuss them here, without aiding the enemy. We do not want to do that do we?

    We suggest that any evidence held against Oliver is put in a very safe place. Any evidence on digital file should be double backed up and loaded/saved onto at least two external platforms . Any paper documents should be scanned or photographed and digitally loaded on the same external platforms. All paper documents should be copied and original files should be stored safely. Courts will not happily copies in criminal cases.
    When using documents with the courts or solicitors which contain any reference to HHJ Oliver . Only use the copies and do not let any originals leave your possession (that include your solicitors of public offices) . Dangerous people like Oliver have wide networks and they are very good at ‘cleaning up’ . They will be very upset now that there is a movement in course to expose him and his cronies.

    Please, if you or a family member has ever been a victim of HHJ Simon Oliver please email me at crookedjudge1@gmail.com
    We also wish to hear from Solicitors and barristers at law, who have knowledge of Oliver’s corruption. Their information will also be dealt with in the strictest confidence. We understand how difficult it is for members of the Judiciary to stand against such corruption, without risk of being excommunicated and/or having their careers completely destroyed. Hopefully, if we manage to get enough witnesses and supporting evidence against HHJ Oliver and Co, we can put a very public stop to some of this.

    I am sorry we cannot look at other Judges at this time, the plan is to focus on HH Judge Simon Oliver. If we are successful, then we can move on to other criminals operating within the Judiciary.

    PLEASE EMAIL crookedjudge1@gmail.com

    THANK YOU
    I would also ask the blogger of this very useful page to also email me please.

  95. COURT OF PROTECTION HEARING, SLOUGH COUNTY COURT, 2005

    cc: Mark Fenhalls QC Leader South Eastern Circuit.
    Andrew Walker QC Former Chair of the Bar. (Who recently exposed judicial bulling)

    A POSITIVE SIDE TO THE JUDICIARY, THAT SOME PEOPLE WILL NEVER EVER EXPERIENCE.

    Two Circuit Judges HHJ Ann Campbell and HHJ Elly had spent around 15 hours on a one to one
    basis with me trying to ascertain what had occurred to me during 2004 to 2006. HHJ Campbell
    also conducted a search at Slough County Court and later at Reading County Court.

    District Judge Peter Devlin, Slough County Court, had refused me access to my court files.
    HHJ Ann Campbell later allowed my appeal against District Judge Peter Devlin order.
    It was later found that District Judge (DJ) Peter Devlin had held several Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificates, DJ Peter Devlin did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    HHJ Ann Campbell found that many of the court tape recordings of hearings were missing.
    However, HHJ Ann Campbell did locate the tape for the hearing below:

    IN THE SLOUGH COUNTY COURT SL3D00938 Thursday 4 August 2005
    Before: District Judge Fortgang.
    Application for change of Court of Protection Guardian.
    Also present:
    MR Dominic BRAZIL 1 Kings Bench Walk
    MR Nicholas ALLEN 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT Office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts
    Solicitor Sarah Benfield (now with Clifton Ingram LLP Reading, Berkshire).
    Mr E….

    The court tapes were sent to Aylesbury County Court where I and a Deputy District Judge
    Bonkin listened to the tapes. The existence of several Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificates, were identified. I was allowed to obtain transcriptions of the court recordings,
    thereafter the court tapes were returned to Slough and Reading County Court.
    The court tapes later went missing !!

    IN THE SLOUGH COUNTY COURT SL3D00938 Thursday 4 August 2005
    Before: District Judge Fortgang.
    Application: For permission for Mr. E and three others to act as my Court of Protection
    Guardians. Excluding Mr E, the other three all had associations with the Security Services,
    two of whom were from a military background, Army and Royal Navy.

    DISTRICT JUDGE FORTGANG:
    Had three Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, and two Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983
    Certificates on the Court file at that time. Also evidence available to him that I had been
    poisoned by ORGANOPHOSPHATES.

    MR NICHOLAS ALLEN: PAGE 12 LINE 35 37
    It is not believed that that Mr E… has been authorised under Part V11 of the Mental Health
    Act 1983.

    It is now known that District Judge John Fortgang, did not hold a Part V11 Mental Health
    Act 1983 authorisation.

    District Judge John Fortgang having refused my application, then placed a £10,000 adverse
    cost order upon me.

    Barrister Dominic BRAZIL, 1 Kings Bench Walk, later informed his now former Head of
    Chambers, Richard Anelay QC, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, that I had been a patient
    subject to the Court of Protection when he had place Hundreds of Thousand of Pounds
    in costs and adverse inferences upon me.

    James Batey, Senior Technical Authority on Court of Protection Rules at the Court of
    Protection at a later date kindly FAXED the information below to me, that was available
    to HHJ Simon Oliver on the 16 April 2012:

    Part V11 of the Mental Health Act 1983
    Powers of the Family Court.
    Only the persons listed in s94 mental Health act 1983 may give any approval or make any
    order required for the management of property and affairs of a patient under Part V11 that
    Act. These persons are the nominated judges of the Court of Protection (High Court judiciary
    of the Chancery and Family Divisions), the Master of the Court of Protection and his
    nominated officers.

    Court of Protection hearings have been occurring in the Thames Valley area since 2004,
    without ( I believe) the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    Documents marked ‘Restricted ‘ have just been disclosed to me by Thames Valley Police.

    The disclosure occurred following the very very recently departure from Thames Valley
    Police of Detective Superintendent, Gillian Vanessa Wootton (Gill Wootton) former Head
    of Force Intelligence and Specialist Operations Department, Thames Valley Police.

    It is the use of Civil Restraint Orders and Extended Civil Restraint Orders with threats of
    imprisonment or fines, or the seizure of your assets that are being use to silence victims
    of abuse. HHJ Simon Oliver has a remarkable track record of Civil Restraint Orders and
    Extended Civil Restraint Orders !

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc Thames House London

    judges behaving badly, could you please forward the above to me by email. I would like
    to forward a copy to Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC High Court Family Division. Thanks.

  96. Dear All
    This is to let everyone know that if you want to guarantee your anonymity online, please do not disclose who your lawyer was in your case as that nipple tweaker Simon Oliver has been impersonating others requesting details. He or one of his brigadier friends request this information anonymously so they can approach the lawyer and obtain your identity indirectly. This is because the lawyer always works for the judge and not their client. This is a technique Simon Oliver and other legal unprofessionals use to keep their bribery network confidential at the expense of our lives. The team at judges behaving badly will never disclose your details as our site is protected with software which we will not disclose publicly. Operation X is here for you the public and we will do everything in our power to expose the system that is the real terrorist in our society.

  97. Hi
    Sounds good but unfortunately to protect our site and innocent members of the public, we require some ID details of yours. As you can kindly understand, Simon Oliver aka the nipple tweaker has been impersonating others on this site along with members of the MoJ to gather identity details. Can you give us some details of your request? You can add it in confidence just between you and the site operators by adding the details in the area where it says ’email address’. We will delete once we have read it and are satisfied.
    Best wishes

  98. Good afternoon All,

    I have set up a situation where I am gathering as much evidence as possible to make a formal case against HHJ Oliver.
    I cannot reveal my identity here, but Len Lawrence knows who I am. I am among other things, a professional intelligence gatherer.
    I wish all genuine victims of HHJ Oliver to contact me asap with their stories . Whatever they send will be dealt with in the strictest of confidence. Oliver and his cohorts will not know who has sent information till we are ready to expose him en masse and all will need to give written consent to move to the next stage.

    But first we need to get a fantastic portfolio of his crimes and criminal activities (with evidence) together.
    The plan is to gather as much testimony and documentary evidence as possible. Paper evidence that you have been genuinely involved with Oliver in the courts and a victim of legitimate injustice is absolutely key to accepting your name on the file. Unfortunately, we cannot act for you on what you feel is an ‘unfair’ ruling or legal outcome unless it is a legally wrong outcome. We can only add you to the HHJ Oliver criminal activity database if we can show there has been genuine Judicial foul play by Oliver with evidence and/or similar.

    We plan to gather audio/visual testimony from victims. These testimonies will be amalgamated into two documents. Both will be used to bring a case against Oliver.
    Witnesses at this stage may do this without revealing their true ID on camera, , but victims’ names will of course be revealed at a later date (with witness signed consent) to police and other law enforcement agencies when we are fully armed and ready to act.
    There are more plans, but it’s not possible to discuss them here, without aiding the enemy. We do not want to do that do we?

    We suggest that any evidence held against Oliver is put in a very safe place. Any evidence on digital file should be double backed up and loaded/saved onto at least two external platforms . Any paper documents should be scanned or photographed and digitally loaded on the same external platforms. All paper documents should be copied and original files should be stored safely. Courts will not happily copies in criminal cases.
    When using documents with the courts or solicitors which contain any reference to HHJ Oliver . Only use the copies and do not let any originals leave your possession (that include your solicitors of public offices) . Dangerous people like Oliver have wide networks and they are very good at ‘cleaning up’ . They will be very upset now that there is a movement in course to expose him and his cronies.

    Please, if you or a family member has ever been a victim of HHJ Simon Oliver please email me at crookedjudge1@gmail.com
    We also wish to hear from Solicitors and barristers at law, who have knowledge of Oliver’s corruption. Their information will also be dealt with in the strictest confidence. We understand how difficult it is for members of the Judiciary to stand against such corruption, without risk of being excommunicated and/or having their careers completely destroyed. Hopefully, if we manage to get enough witnesses and supporting evidence against HHJ Oliver and Co, we can put a very public stop to some of this.

    I am sorry we cannot look at other Judges at this time, the plan is to focus on HH Judge Simon Oliver. If we are successful, then we can move on to other criminals operating within the Judiciary.

    PLEASE EMAIL crookedjudge1@gmail.com

    THANK YOU
    I would also ask the blogger of this very useful page to also email me please.

  99. Hi
    Sounds good but unfortunately to protect our site and innocent members of the public, we require some ID details of yours. As you can kindly understand, Simon Oliver aka the nipple tweaker has been impersonating others on this site along with members of the MoJ to gather identity details. Can you give us some details of your request? You can add it in confidence just between you and the site operators by adding the details in the area where it says ’email address’. We will delete once we have read it and are satisfied. Can Len also confirm whenever convenient whether you know P Sinclair?
    Best wishes

  100. The network includes corrupt judges, lawyers, police, politicians, court managers, court workers, and organised crime gangs up and just about every oversight or regulatory body up and down and down the country.

  101. An email was sent to Nick Goodwin, who is Britain’s PUBLIC GUARDIAN, referring him to the information on this site. As you can see, he deleted the email WITHOUT READING IT. Emails to government are PUBLIC RECORDS and it is against public policy to delete them. Michael Goves’ office was in trouble for deleting emails only a few years ago.

    So you see, the Public Guardian is part of the racket if he just deletes emails. We catch a lot of public servants simply deleting emails with NO INTENTION WHATSOEVER of replying or forwarding them to the minister involved. They have these jobs and are paid by the taxpayer under false pretences. They don’t do their jobs and, in my books, that’s fraud – taking money under false pretences..

    ​​​—– Forwarded Message —–
    ​​​​From: “nick goodwin”
    To:
    Sent: Thursday, 12 September, 2019 05:33:06
    Subject: Not read: To judges behaving badly

    ​​​​​________________________________
    This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

  102. Dear webpage master – I completely understand the dilemma here about anonymity and the very likely possibility that Oliver is watching this page. We need to get around that problem if we are to take formal action against him and others. We need a safe place offline (out of public view) to build a case, that is my intention. I would be more than happy to communicate my ID to you, but there is nowhere here that gives an inbox option. would you please communicate how I may communicate with you out of view. I have already sent my ID and a credential to Len Lawrence. Please advise asap Thank you.
    P.S. There are typos on the post I sent but can not find an edit option. This page is not loading well for me, posts are out of sync with regards to date. Could be my system. I will try to repost at bottom of page. Thank you for your attention and the valuable work you are doing here.

  103. I see that you are not posting the address online. Google the one I send internally with this post and check the website. That is us. After checking the site, please email or inbox me so I can know who we are dealing with here. Thank you.

  104. Hi Len can you confirm you know P. Sinclair?
    Yes, I do know Penelope Sinclair, her father and I had servered in the Silent Service.
    A very brave operator.
    Len Lawrence

  105. Would like to get the information on Oliver’s companies, including the names of other directors.

  106. The guy shown in the video is not the Court Clerk, Freddy Cutts from Reading.
    The Court Clerk Freddy Cutts resembles Harry Hill (the comedian without the humour) – he is bald, slim build, approx. 5′ 5″, approx. late 50’s.
    Still resides in Berkshire.
    Could be the same guy who undertook The Henley Half Marathon in 2015 – BIB No. 319 !!

  107. To: Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasonary, WM Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Provincial Grand Secretary, Berkshire Freemasonary, David W.J. Keys
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire RG41 5EA

    According to my former solictors SIMPSON MILLAR LLP, following the court hearing
    on the 16 April 2012 at Reading County Court before the Worshipfull Master, HHJ Simon
    Oliver, on the 17 April 2012 WM HHJ Simon Oliver telephoned my barrister at St Philips
    Chambers, Birmingham.

    Thereafter my barrister withdrew from my case. I was instructed to pay barrister Dominic
    Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, £10,000 and a substantial amount of monies to
    BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire.

    What was puzzling is why my barrister and solictor withdrew form my case, when as you
    are aware, the Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver had been instructed to send my case
    to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    WM Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE and WM David W. J. Keys, I have already sent you a
    copy of Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver email 11 Febuary 13 2013 Timed 15:21 hrs

    I have still to ascertain what was said to my barrister. What has been establised is that
    there is no record of Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver or HMCTS Reading informing
    St Philips Chambers, Birmigham or Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors that Mrs Justice
    Pauffley had instructed Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case
    to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Again puzzling is why a person associated with Berkshire Freemasonary and this Masonic
    Lodge: Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 should travel to Devon to talk to me? My visitor
    is not the only Masonic visitor that I have recieved unexpectedly.

    WM Howlett-Bolton you served as Superintendent/ Chief Superintendent with Thames
    Valley Police and later as Deputy Chief Constable in the Bedfordshire Police Force.

    Less than four weeks after the Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver was, in Febuary
    2013, instructed to send my case to the Civil Court of Appeal I found myself under
    investigation by the Metropolition Police, Revenue and Customs and other Goverment
    Agencies. A person with, I believe, a higher security level than yourself interviened
    along with several others. The Provincial Grand Secretary, Berkshire Freemasonary,
    WM David W.J. Keys may care to explain what occurred to me in 2016 !!

    Penelope Sinclair, like myself and some other victims have military backgrounds.
    Army, Royal Navy etc. There is even a former child protection officer who had servered
    with the Metropolition Police. What we and our colleagues do not understand is why
    Worshipful Master HHJ Simon Oliver is entirly satisfied that we have been made
    homeless and in the case of some, their children taken.

    Leonard Lawrence

  108. why call the scumbag, worship? or master?
    The only title is Judge,(achieve academic or nominate who swear to the law for justice ) yet he is a crooked judge who has made a mockery of the system and the law by appointment and is worth nothing
    Karma will catch up and he will rot in hell for its unlawful action here in the material world
    a freemason or not even a freemason always a freemason, if the organization has gotten used to it or not there is definitely a kind of cultic impact here and all that with profit

    working on the spiritual level , we have removed him and demand his retreat,
    otherwise he fears us all, every one of you ,who gives the details, hence the mobbing, extortion Bullying and suppression by abuse of law, the Ministry can not initiate investigations, as the weaknesses are uncovered and possibly the whole system collapses

    For too long he has escaped with his Charade and other judges see it as an opportunity to follow him What we need is a group that stands against it and forces it to its knees
    Likewise, this site is good and explores its run-down game,
    But it is professional to bring about justice. Summon all the professionals who have been wronged to bring about justice

  109. Dear Roger,

    Dr David Staples is the Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE),
    Dr David Staples is also Grand Secretary, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE),
    the governing body of Freemasonry in England, Wales, the Isle of Man .

    Dr David Staples can be contacted by:
    Emailing: info@ugle.org.uk or by emailing his secretary cmenditta@ugle.org.uk
    Writing: 60 Great Queen St, Holborn, London WC2B 5AZ

    Why did I refer to HHJ Simon Oliver as the Worshipful Master ?

    A Worshipful Master of a London Masonic Lodge wrote to Dr David Staples regarding
    the conduct of WM HHJ Simon Oliver. I have been given sight of Dr David Staples reply.
    Dr David Staples reply was unhelpful. Thereafter a number of Freemasons resigned
    leaving insufficient members for the Lodge to continual.

    When justice finally catches up with WM HHJ Simon Oliver, Dr David Staples cannot
    say he did not know how WM HHJ Simon Oliver has disgraced himself by ruining the
    lives of others, particularly those that are very vulnerable.

    FTAO Dr David Staples: This is from a genuine and truthful Officer :-
    Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself
    by ruining the lives of others against all Masonic and ethical principles. Indeed if you
    read the Charge after initiation, every Mason has a personal responsibility to behave in
    a manner which is ‘useful to mankind and become an ornament to the society’

    Leonard Lawrence

  110. I have case file emails from earlier in my case which prove that HHJ Oliver either deliberately covers the microphone or ensures that portions of his comments are illegible. The emails are from the transcribers complaining that they cannot make out sections of the recording and to refer to the Judge to which Freddy Cutts replies that all the Judge will have is his notes which are minimal. As we know this lets the judge fabricate the judgment further than the perfunctionary sanitation or amendement of a judgement usually extended to the Judiciary. I will provide these at some point if they maybe useful and anonymously to the site creators.

  111. It’s not possible to get the recording, the Court won’t release it. The point is it’s in writing that Oliver conceals his judgments from the tapes and then gets to make up the rest of it to suit his needs for an outcome and is giving unlawful and fraudulent judgements.

  112. There was a supreme gourt ruling stating judges must give up their notes to meet with the statute about judges being transparent to the scrutiny of the public.

  113. We know that, in most cases, judges EDIT any court transcripts before they are sent to people. How many of them cover their microphones, we don’t know but, when you see a court transcript, many of them are puctuated with “…inaudible…” “…inaudible…..”.. NONE OF THEM should be allowed to EDIT court transcripts. Crooks. I’ll wager most of them are crooks.

  114. I agree.
    However, you don’t ask, you never get.
    That which you do get, there’s always a trail of something.
    .
    If it says inaudible, ask for the original audio.
    The judges written notes should be supplied photocopied out of his book, and
    if not, ask for them.
    If necessary, get a court order.

  115. The ICO supported an application to disclose a Judges motebook in a 4 year case that was fundamental to the proceedings but I haven’t seen a generic precedent that states all Judges are required to disclose, could you reference it on here? The tapes are not a required disclosure and yes all Judges are sent the draft transcript to change. Many Judgements contain the phrase “inaudible” but I’m talking about emails sent between the Judge, transcribers and Freddy Cutts where the transcribers are complaining that almost all of the REASONS for the Judgment are inaudible including the threshold criteria and whole sections which Freddy Cutts states would be difficult to correct as the Judge only has minimal notes (translated none) and wouldn’t remember it which is different to what you are stating and if it is of use to the website creators as hard evidence, I will provide it anonymously. Judges can also amend orders, vary them at will and change historical ones on a whim. There is no regulation/recourse which opens it to extreme corruption. Everything in a case is sent to a Judge first to “amend” so they can change it after the fact. It’s racketeering.

  116. Their notes are even more tampered! If the recordings and microphones are tampered with, its obvious their handwritten notes will not be there to incriminate themselves. Their handwritten notes are just what they want to write in the judgement which is nearly always manipulated. Its the digital audio and video devices they are more concerned about which always are missing or strangely not good quality.

  117. Also despite the fact that huge sections of the judgement were inaudible, the Judgement received was berefit of evidence in Chief and much of the proceedings, although the reasons and threshold were made up to fit.

  118. Additionally re: tapes. There are TWO tapes in any Court, another as a backup so if you are told that the tape is missing, ask for the other one. They can’t claim both are ruined or missing wihtout some difficulty.

  119. Unfortunately they do. However, nowadays the recordings are stored digitally on the DART server which also go missing. Justice William Charles from the Upper Tribunal does it himself to cover Oliver up. Its very common. Judgements are made up and fabricated. Would you trust a judge who sits as a Court of Protection judge and delivers judgement on it when he is not licensed to hear those cases.

  120. Update. – still waiting to hear from webmaster of this blog.
    Repost

    Good afternoon All,

    I have set up a situation where I am gathering as much evidence as possible to make a formal case against HHJ Oliver.
    I cannot reveal my identity here, but Len Lawrence knows who I am.
    I wish all genuine victims of HHJ Oliver to contact me asap with their stories . Whatever they send will be dealt with in the strictest of confidence. Oliver and his cohorts will not know who has sent information till we are ready to expose him en masse and all will need to give written consent to move to the next stage.

    Initially, we need to get a fantastic portfolio of his crimes and criminal activities (with evidence) together.
    The plan is to gather as much testimony and documentary evidence as possible. Paper evidence that you have been genuinely involved with Oliver in the courts and a victim of legitimate injustice is absolutely key to accepting your name on the file. Unfortunately, we cannot act for you on what you feel is an ‘unfair’ ruling or legal outcome unless it is a ‘legally wrong’ and there is evidence of obstruction of justice, leading to that outcome. We can only add you to the HHJ Oliver criminal activity database if we can show there has been genuine Judicial foul play by Oliver with evidence and/or similar.

    We plan to gather audio/visual testimony from victims. These testimonies will be amalgamated into two documents. Both will be used to bring a case against Oliver.
    Witnesses at this stage may do this without revealing their true ID on camera, , but victims’ names will of course be revealed at a later date (with witness signed consent) to police and other law enforcement agencies when we are fully armed and ready to act.
    There are more plans, but it’s not possible to discuss them here, without aiding the enemy. We do not want to do that do we?

    We suggest that any evidence held against Oliver is put in a very safe place. Any evidence on digital file should be double backed up and loaded/saved onto at least two external platforms . Any paper documents should be scanned or photographed and digitally loaded on the same external platforms. All paper documents should be copied and original files should be stored safely. Courts will not happily copies in criminal cases.
    When using documents with the courts or solicitors which contain any reference to HHJ Oliver . Only use the copies and do not let any originals leave your possession (that include your solicitors of public offices) . Dangerous people like Oliver have wide networks and they are very good at ‘cleaning up’ . They will be very upset now that there is a movement in course to expose him and his cronies.

    Please, if you or a family member has ever been a victim of HHJ Simon Oliver please email me at crookedjudge1@gmail.com
    We also wish to hear from Solicitors and barristers at law, who have knowledge of Oliver’s corruption. Their information will also be dealt with in the strictest confidence. We understand how difficult it is for members of the Judiciary to stand against such corruption, without risk of being excommunicated and/or having their careers completely destroyed. Hopefully, if we manage to get enough witnesses and supporting evidence against HHJ Oliver and Co, we can put a very public stop to some of this.

    I am sorry we cannot look at other Judges at this time, the plan is to focus on HH Judge Simon Oliver. If we are successful, then we can move on to other criminals operating within the Judiciary.

    PLEASE EMAIL crookedjudge1@gmail.com

    THANK YOU

  121. You can’t use Judge and trust in the same sentence, it’s a contradiction in terms.

  122. Will the people who have been harmed by Oliver, please publish here whether or not they complained to the Judicial Complaints Investigations Committee, and what happened? We need to find out who is involved in blocking complaints. We know it is ALL OF THEM, but let’s start naming them. Please name those who blocked the investigation. Also, please state whether or not you complained to police, which officers you dealt with, and what happened? We need to get all these names exposed for the complete corruption involved in this fraudulent complaints system. The complaints system in EVERY AREA of government is fraudulent. Don’t forget, they are ‘Her Majesty’s” courts and “Her Majesty’s” judiciary. Her Deputy Private Secretary is an Associate Partner of KPMG, by the way, so anyone with a complaint against KPMG is not likely to get very far. People have to stop looking at the Royal Family through rose coloured glasses and take a good hard look at how the system works. Police are NOT independent of government, no matter what utter crap they tell us. The Queen can, and does, intervene when it suits her, so the nonsense about her not being able to intervene is simply not true. She is Head of State.

  123. RECORDER NICHOLAS ALLEN QC

    Email: 27 July 2005 Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors. Reading

    “Mr. Lawrence is not capable of discussing the legal proceedings and counsel (Nicholas Allen)
    and I (soliciotor Sarah Benfield RDG) are concerned about the implications of that upon any
    attendance we have with Mr. Lawrence”

    Recorder Allen QC has adviseed he cannot support the evidence that he gave at court in my case,

    Barrister/Recorder Nicholas Allen. Bedford Row Chambers. 29 Bedford Row London, WC1R 4HE
    Barrister/Recorder Nicholas Allen. St Ives Chambers, 1-3 Whittall Street, Birmingham. B4 6DH

    5 August 2010 Barrister Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    I am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to District Judge Fortgang
    that the Official Solicitor (Laurence Oates) agreed that the house be sold for £622,000.”

    Barrister/Recorder Nicholas Allen has refused to retunt the thousands of pounds that he stole
    from me. He has still to disclose the Court of Protection, Medical Certicates, that he held to
    the Court of Protection..

    Leonard Lawrence

  124. To: Barrister Nicholas Allen.
    From: Leonard Lawrence .

    Aa blast from the past, one of your private emails in my case SL03D00938.
    .
    Email NAllen@29bedfordrow.co.uk
    05 August 2005 10.30

    From: Barrister Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    To: Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers,

    Subject: Lawrence

    Dear Dominic

    As requested. I have simply “accepted all” the tracked changes.
    I haven’t fully checked what effect this has had on the draft order,
    but hope that it is sufficient for your purposes

    Best Wishes,

    Nick

    PS Barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, has now
    informed his now former Head of Chambers that I had been a patient
    subject to the Court of Protection whe uou (Nichalas Allen and Dominic
    Brazil assett stripped me without the kowledge of the Court of Protection,

  125. Dear P Sinclair,
    We have done initial checks and we are satisfied. Len has kindly confirmed. Thank you Len. We would like to welcome aboard P Sinclair, we are the operators of judges behaving badly, we represent Operation X, this blog is the canvas and the public is performing the masterpiece. The audience is the world. Please feel free to comment on this site and others are welcome to send your documents to P Sinclair at crookedjudge1@gmail.com. We will privately be in touch too in the near future.

  126. It would be most useful if people can answer for themselves, and describe the details, including names of what happened when they complained.

  127. I made a complaint about judge Simon Oliver to the jcio in May 2015 and at the response I got was from Jane keeling. My complaint concerned judicial bribery wherr HHJ Simon Oliver asked me for £25,000 in return for my grandson! The jcio said that at I have to prove the allegation to the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt but I am unsure as to how I could do that when cameras are not allowed in the courtroom because it is contempt of Court. The recordings also go missing as well or the are tampered. I don’t regret my complaint to the Jaco and I got a letter back from someone called heather who said that the procedure that the jcio followed was not wrong. Basically, the conclusion is that judge Simon Oliver is allowed to take bribes and no one is going to stop him and that includes the police as well. I made a complaint to the police on the metropolitan Police online reporting website and I received a response from an officer who took down the details of my complaint but said he will not give me a crime reference number for it. This was a police station in the city of London police and the police officer was called Stephen but I can’t remember his last name now. He emailed me about a month later and said that he does not believe me because I have a criminal record and the case was closed. I escalated this to the city of London Police complaints system and I kept getting a standard letter back saying that I was trying to ‘Vex’ the city of London police and this now constitutes to harassment and if I continue then I could be arrested.
    Eventually I gave up after nearly 2 years. I came across this website a few years ago and I was amazed that judge Simon Oliver is doing this to everyone. The man has also been accused of murdering someone’s son because he exposed him and a corrupt police officer in Thames Valley Police and even then the police didn’t want to know!

  128. I believe that a person has to complain about crime in the police district in which it took place. In this case, if it is Reading court, then it would be Thames Valley Police. We know they have been protecting Oliver and Cutts. However, there is no statute of limitations on crime, and perhaps you could try reporting the attempted blackmail and the other crimes to Thames Valley, and DEMAND a LOG NUMBER (crime reference number). If you have any problems getting one, remind them that they have been failing to record 35,000 crimes per year, and that you will go to the media unless they give you a crime reference number and the name of the officer issuing it.

  129. easier said than done, the media is not interested either and the police is not interested in giving a crime reference number either the reason I went to city of London police was because the website report that I made directed me to the city of London police. Apparently, it does not matter what police station or district you report crime to because it all goes through the same criminal justice system. The individual officer and police station may try to push you to go to your local district but this is not correct, you can make a police report at any police station in the country regardless of district. If the police want to take any action, they will either travel to the district where the offender is or they will communicate with the local district police force where the offender lives. You don’t have to do anything else

  130. City of London Police.

    Detective Superintendent, Gavin Tyrrell, Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud,
    City of London Police.

    Det Supt, Gavin Tyrrell prior to joining City of London Police was Det Insp Gavin Tyrrell,
    Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police.

    About three years ago the then Det Insp Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit,
    Thames Valley Police advised me that my case had been reviewed by Thames Valley
    Police and no crimes had been identified. We now know this to be untrue, criminal
    offences against solicitors and barristers had been identified.

    Valerie Copping Professional Standards Department, Thames Valley Police identified
    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, Reading CID as the reviewing police officer.

    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts had identified that I had been a patient subject to
    the Court of Protection from November 2004 following the issuing of a medical report
    by Dr Royds Cygnet Health Care to solicitor Graeme S Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors.
    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser had denied the existence of this medical certificate.

    Ian Younger CFE CMgr Deputy Director – Professional Standards Directorate, City
    of London Police (Ian Younger is a civilian employee) appears to have blocked all
    my communication links with City of London Police other than by telephone to
    himself.

    Ian Younger, this website is proving to be a informative source of information.
    Commissioner Ian Dyson is the the head of the City of London Police, I will
    communicate with the Commissioner via this and other websites.

    Detective Superintendent, Gavin Tyrrell why did you tell the Serious and Organised
    Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police not to take a statement from me when Det
    Insp Nicholas Watts had identified offences of perjury and fraud ??

    Stephen Proffitt, former Deputy Head of Action Fraud had also identified offences of
    fraud and other more serious offences including perjury.

    It was Ass. Ch. Con. Nick Downing when a Det. Ch. Supt. with the Metropolitan Police that
    had directed me to Action Fraud. Stephen Proffitt also severed with the Metropolitan
    Police.

    Detective Superintendent, Gavin Tyrrell, you had known of the existence of the Court
    of Protection, Medical Certificates, five/six years earlier but I can find no record of
    you notifying the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence
    cc
    Commissioner Ian Dyson. Head of the City of London Police
    ian.dyson@cityoflondon.pnn.police.uk

  131. If gavin tyrell is head of economic crime, hes obviously very bad at his job if he keeps his head up Olivers bum

  132. Dear all, I have set up a survey to initiate the collection of victims with evidence, Please go to the link and fill in the survey. It is confidential and the answers will not be in the public – here is the link if there are any technical problems please could someone let me know. Thank you.
    domain.https://surveyhero.com/c/0170b856

  133. This portly corrupt judge took a bribe in an open public courtroom at the upper tribunal in London breams building from the chief executive officer Robert bell of the Royal Brompton and harefield NHS trust and the HR director Carol Johnson also from the Royal Brompton and harefield NHS trust. I was challenging a decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service to put me on the vulnerable adults list and children’s list under false allegations. It came to light that the reason he received a gift on the morning of the hearing from the Royal Brompton and harefield NHS trust was because they knew all along that the allegations made against me were false and they just needed Simon Oliver to confirm it in a judicial judgement which he did. When I tried to appeal it, he threatened me with a civil restraint order which I can now see that this is a technique he uses to block appeals. I made an official complaint to the upper tribunal president of the administration appeals chamber, his name was Justice William Charles. Justice William Charles said that he is refusing to investigate the allegation of Simon Oliver receiving a box because the allegation is incredible. The rest of the allegations that I made against Simon Oliver was also covered up. Justice William Charles also told me that he could not hear all of the hearing on the recordings and most of it has gone missing from the dart server. I made a complaint about Justice William Charles to the judicial conduct arbitration service and their response was that Justice William Charles has every right not to investigate an allegation if he chooses not to. I then escalated this to the judicial conduct investigations office and the matter went to a lady called Jane Keeling who responded and said that it is not the judicial conduct investigations offices job to investigate judges taking bribes. They said I had to take the matter to the police. I went to the police and they refused to give me a crime reference number but appeared to investigate it for about a month. They came back to me and said there is no CCTV footage on the day of the hearing and no digital recordings of the hearing either as they have all gone missing! They also approached another member of the courtroom whom I do not wish to name at this stage who refused to co-operate with the police because he was scared of the repercussions that he would get from Oliver I guess. I took the matter to the court of appeal and the court of appeal said there was no errors in law when there was a clear and concise error of law under article 8 and article 6 as well as article 10.

    All in all, Simon Oliver seems to have got away with it for a very long time and does not seem to be stopping anytime soon. I can no longer work in the NHS because judge Simon Oliver took a bribe to falsely label me a paedophile when I am not. When I challenged him on his judgement and about the false findings of facts that he made, he responded and said that the evidence that he relied upon is what he heard at the hearing and not the material facts submitted as evidence (as there were none) but the evidence of this does not exist (because he was tampering with the court microphones and the recordings went missing)! So therefore, there is no evidence of his judgement but seems to exist in public databases.

  134. I read the case of Lady Ella and realized that
    from the first moment she was arrested, she presented all the evidence that was ignored

    this was definitely a malicious prosecution to get her out of the way
    held her for 3 days more than 52 Hours under mistaken ID
    is beyond me she already confirmed her photo ID ,yet TVP failing to researchers
    held her without food and water dragged her to the criminal court

    the criminal court gave her a bail and confirmed her photo ID, the deposit was granted on presentation of the passport which was at her home

    Help me out here, is that real?
    She gave her ID card, which was recognized by the criminal court because the opponent had asked for the passport. The judge granted 3 days to present the passport to court.

    a) Now, as a judge, you are either asking for your passport at each police station so that the data can be confirmed and identified. Then the driver’s license is more than enough, and she goes free
    A judge could also issue a search warrant while the suspect is detained

    Only the police should do this in advance to avoid the trial . Either we are dealing with amateurs or conspiracies where the child served as an obsessive target

    Everything that indicates a setup

    1. Identity card was ignored on your doorstep
    2 unlawful arrest when the EU arrest warrant granted many hours later,
    There was no legal document about her arrest
    3 false arrests 1 without doc. 2nd off duty ,unauthorized un-uniformed officer
    Arrest in front of the police station, then suspiciously through the back door to the on-duty Sergeant Johnson, who perhaps explains the strange phrase “leaving a vulnerable while he’s on bail”.
    3rd. arrest for no reason , but acted in breach of the law when the company refused
    She was in fact no bail-risk disarmed and extremely vulnerable, with no contact to her family home.

    Having understood this correctly, she volunteered to go to the Newbury Police Station and ask for help to return to her child, who was being cared for by a relative.
    So, where is the charge here?

    She hands over her bail and was imprisoned again. A team of 3 policemen ransacked the house and seemed to be interesting only to mothers and childs pass bullied ,gagged and harassed the relatives and abducted the child under PPO, turning it into suspected neglect, as the child was already traumatized, and then described it in the document “To Stop the Suspect, Escape with the Child from the Country.”

    Here she is detained under false identity for a suspected extradition case. usually family stays together in extradition cases and everyone is expelled
    why imprisonment is another matter. Do I understand with this remark that the suspect flees with the child from the country and tries to accuse Mum of child trafficking?

    Where additional evidence other than fraud of social services tempering the DNA results which clearly stated , that she is the mother yet they added 4 different names to this DNA certificate and held it back nearly 3 months, as it was then expired

    This is where Judge Oliver comes into play
    The social services hurry up with the caregiving process, while the mother had no idea no one has interviewed her, no police, no social worker, an order signed and secured by a retired judge Derbyshire
    the child was detained for many hours the same police station, where social services secured the order same day in a closed court next to the police station,
    there were no hearings for more than 5 years though somehow one was canceled
    the order should of bare the address of Newbury but quickly changed to Reading
    A quick check up by NHS to the child possible provn neglect or abuse ,unfortunately for Judge Oliver no physical psychosocial or psychological abuse proven

    The mother was released home when she found that her place was disturbed, and broke into all her doc to her and childs ID were missing including her child She called around to find out that there were no social services available for the child.

    therefore another arrest without reason, until a reason, which indicates no locating device, which was rejected by the court ordered firm, who refused as description said 5.8 blue eyes.
    POLISH
    Only this lady is only 5,6 with hazel eyes, does not speak Polish! Was never in Poland
    The next day, she was returned to the criminal court to present her passport. The only thing missing was that the police did the work to stop the bail. removed the miner and denied the evidence of where she was confined with severe restraint, without giving contacts inside or outside, isolation cell and a cocktail of 5 tablets 3 times a day,
    Because of this, she was dehydrated, tired and tearful in shock under trauma still she was forced to answer a name she did not possess. When she did not answer, an attack took place, beaten or lasered like an electric shock,
    her passport appear weeks later in the prison disposal

    Now in the system, she would have 8 days to stand before a court and the jury why was this denied, and barely 2 months later, a double-entry to court
    criminal to prove her innocence and family court to Judge Oliver,

    After the imprisonment of the mother, allegations of alleged negligence were dropped
    That’s why we represent social rights in the form of an infringement. All records of the mother and child kept for more than 3 years are withheld

    The pure mother was handcuffed to the officers each time she moved via feet and each hand
    That sounds like the Middle East, right?
    Not even the master criminals who killed someone or who posed a high security risk with possible escape or killing , but Judge Oliver ordered this in court. She was told that she has no rights
    She was discriminated against and humiliated. He too had a box she was naive in and thought it might be his birthday

    She was hidden in the background
    As he played and laughed with his microphone, he made the comment that it was not working properly

    He stated that he believes and identifies that she is Polish and that extradition restricts her to any petition to the courts for three years. If she spoke to anyone in the world about this 6-year prison, it would be added.

    The social services used this to blackmail the mother, and all their activities were persecuted to falsify the caring of the child by, over time, entering false data, names, and spellings in the same case

    The finding that Mother is not the suspect was removed from her DNA, which the police considered non-existent and twisted by the social service by adding the suspect’s name to the DNA certificate, which is a deadly invasion of privacy
    and fraud
    Well, how many violations can you count?
    In November 2016, a childcare assignment was addressed to the child with the wrong name.

    Another violation of the law, since you have three months to appeal. No one can restrict you to a motion and no family judge can imprison you for six years for contacting your family abroad.
    alienated by separation almost 4 years no contact and redtaped is something else

    Is the queen also the head of the FCO? Where doc has to obey, is the British government right?
    So if a change is made to release the child and be entitled to correct errors, this should be followed
    Only disobedience is another offense and can be a detention

    The addition of an international human rights system and non-compliance with laws violates the EU Convention. A relevant regulation must be observed

    Withholding documents and scripts and changing case numbers delays the child’s return

    therefore, is there someone somewhere who can order the release with immediate effect, there is no negotiation. can you help?

  135. To: Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police
    Deputy Chief Constable, Jason Hogg, Thames Valley Police.

    Dear Sir’s,

    On the 23 July 2019 I forwarded to yourselves the following:
    The COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATE, that was issued on the 27 January 2005
    by Dr Jeremy Royds, Cygnet Health Care, Godden Green, Kent.

    The COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATE was received at Force HQ the next day.
    Your item was collected from **Kidlington DO** at **24-07-2019**.
    Signed for by: TVP HQ
    Service used: Royal Mail Signed For™ Delivered: 9:10am

    On the 1 August 2019 I forwarded to yourselves and others the same COURT OF PROTECTION,
    MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 01 August 2019 23:16
    To: chiefconstable@thamesvalley.pnn.police.uk
    Cc: Hammond Paul; sr. disaility
    Subject: FW: Court of Protection Medical Certificate, Dr Royds, Cygnet Healthcare

    As advised, I am directed to enquire from Thames Valley Police whether Dr Jeremy Royds
    COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE is authentic or fraudulent ?

    Given the following:

    THE COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE dated 27 January 2005, had:
    1. No bar code.
    2. No serial number
    3. No security markings on the paper
    4. Neither The Court of Protection or Public Guardian had knowledge of this certificate.
    5. The existence of this COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE had been denied
    by solicitor Sarah Benfield, whilst she obtained my signature on Legal Aid Forms.
    6. Solicitor Sarah Benfield is now with Clifton Ingram, County House, 17 Friar Street
    Reading RG1 1DB. Following the merger between Clifton Ingram and Ratcliffe Duce
    and Gammer Solicitors.

    The Solicitors Regulatory Authority advised me that solicitor Sarah Benfield admitted
    to knowingly gaining my signature on legal aid forms, avoiding the Court of Protection,
    when according to the former chambers of:
    Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC 1 Garden Court Chambers
    Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    I was incapable of legal discussion and understanding (due to an aquired brain injury)

    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime, Thames Valley Police,
    concluded that it was an error. I am advised by the the Law Society that Sarah Benfield
    does not support Det. Insp. Gavin Tyrrell findings. She knowingly gained my signature
    on documents knowing that I lacked mental capacity. Det. Insp. Tyrrell knew this !

    The review of Det. Insp. Gavin Tyrrell findings, by Det Insp. Nicholas Watts, also does
    not support Det. Insp. Gavin Tyrrell findings ! Det Insp. Nicholas Watts identifies that
    BP Collins Solicitor held, but had also denied holding, a Medical Certificate of Mental
    Capacity under Part V11 (MHA 1983) whist my signature was obtained on legal aid forms.

    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell has now left Thames Valley Police and is now;
    T/Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell. Head of City and National Lead Fraud Teams.
    City of London Police.

    To: Commissioner Ian Dyson, QPM, Commissioner of the City of London Police;

    T/Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell, City of London Police, may care to explain to
    you why he told the Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall Police not
    to take a statement from me following the identification of fraud, perjury and other
    serious offences.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc Paul Hammond, Chief Executive Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner.

  136. JASWANT NARWAL, CHIEF CROWN PROSECUTOR, THAMES AND CHILTERN.
    Rt. Hon. Geoffery Cox QC Attorney General for England and Wales.
    Anthony Stansfeld, Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner.

    There had to be a reason why solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins
    Solicitors had tried (but failed) to obtain a Civil Restraint Order against me.

    DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT GILL WOOTTON, NOW FORMER HEAD OF SPECIALIST
    OPERATIONS AND COVERT POLICING, THAMES VALLEY POLICE AND THAMES VALLEY
    POLICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, SITTING ON EVIDENCE FOR OVER 14 YEARS !!

    DISCLOSURE: 16 AUGUST 2019, BY THAMES VALLEY POLICE.
    09/06/2005 17:56:2 FILE RECEIVED BACK FROM CPS (CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE)
    YESTERDAY-REVIEWED: NEED TO SET UP APPOINTMENT TO DISCUSS AGG’D VIEW
    THAT THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.

    14 YEARS LATER AND THAMES VALLEY POLICE HAVE STILL NOT COMPLIED WITH THE
    CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS.

    THE NEW EVIDENCE IN JUNE 2005
    Solicitor Graeme S Fraser and B.P. Collins Solicitor had failed to disclose Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificates, and Part V11 MHA 1983 Medical Certificates, to Slough and Reading
    County Court and the Court of Protection on the 4 April 2005.

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser had also disclosed some of Leonard Lawrence’s stolen financial
    documents. Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser had advised his client not to comment, so as not to
    incriminate themselves. That did not stop Graeme Fraser and BP Collins Solicitors placing
    Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in costs and advere inferances upon me.

    No judge at Slough or Reading County Court that had dealt with my case, starting in 2004
    had held a Part V11 authorisation.

    A former Attorney General for England and Wales Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP had also
    requested Thames Valley Police to investigate my case.

    Yours sincerly,

    Leonard Lawrence
    ———————————————————————
    From: James Batey,
    Senior Technical Authority on Court of Protection Rules at the Court of Protection.
    To: Leonard Lawrence
    Part V11 MHA 1983
    Only the persons listed in s94 Mental Health Act 1983 may give any approval or make any
    order required for the management of property and affairs of a patient under Part VII of
    that Act. These persons are the nominated judges of the Court of Protection (High Court
    judiciary of the Chancery and Family divisions), the Master of the Court of Protection and
    his nominated Officers.

  137. To whom it may concern
    Simon Oliver was supposed to hear my case but the court said to me that my response document has gone missing. The recorded delivery certificate confirmed that it had been received at the court but no one could find it. I believe that Simon Oliver or one of his Stooges in the court deliberately removed my response to sabotage my defence resulting in my children being taken away
    beware of Simon Oliver and his clerk, they are document tamperers. Even proof of delivery was not enough to convince them.

  138. These ‘little tricks’ are happening in ALL the courts. The corruption is astounding. These are not mistakes.

  139. 16 August 2019 disclosure from Thames Valley Police:

    14 YEARS AFTER THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE HAD INSTRUCTED THAMES VALLEY
    POLICE TO TAKE A STATEMENT FROM ME. THAMES VALLEY POLICE HAVE STILL NOT
    COMPLIED WITH THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE INSTRUCTIONS !!

    THE NEW EVIDENCE IN JUNE 2005
    Solicitor Graeme S Fraser and B.P. Collins Solicitor’s had failed to disclose Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificates, and Part V11 MHA 1983, Medical Certificates, to Slough and Reading
    County Courts and the Court of Protection.

    WHY HAS SENIOR POLICE OFFICERS WITHIN THAMES VALLEY POLICE WITHHELD THE
    ABOVE INFORMATION FROM THE COURT OF PROTECTION AND THE CROWN PROSECUTION
    SERVICE ?

    Regards,

    LEONARD LAWRENCE

    P.S. THE DISCLOSURE OCCURRED VERY SHORTLY AFTER DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT
    GILLIAN VANESSA WOOTTON LEFT THAMES VALLEY POLICE.

    Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton
    The Force Intelligence and Specialist Operations Department includes the Serious and
    Organised Crime Unit (SOCU), Dedicated Surveillance & Force Proactive Teams and
    Economic Crime Unit incorporating the Cyber Crime Team.

  140. Dear Blog, did you ever hear from this lady again? do you have a contact for her?
    Miasays:
    November 21, 2016 at 9:06 am
    Hi,can you please contact me urgently. This judge was responsible for some ” unknown” strangers stealing my only Child from his school last week. I still have not seen or heard from my child and it’s a nightmare for me and my child. My child is in high risk of emotional abuse and negligence with strangers around him now.He was solely cared by his mother well,past 9 years of his life and there are plenty of supporting documents to prove the high standards of care the child had. My child was stolen from his school last week without his mother’s permission/ awareness, by using a fabricated and fraud document. I have never seen this judge in my life but his name was written on that document which was shown to cheat the child’s head teacher to steal my child. This abusive action was taken againt my vulnerable child with a false document produced out of an unlawful hearing “without both parties” presence in court for a final hearing ( for which court didn’t send any notice of hearing to parties)..! Eventually, I came to know father stole the child with illegal doings of his high paid solicitor by using this judge.Father lived mainly abroad past 9 years & has never “even once” been to child’s school past 4 years of child’s schooling.The child has also not seen or talked to the father past 3 years of divorce proceedings.Now after this child abusive incident by using a fraud document, I don’t think my child can be safe alone with his father or strangers around him, since the biggest & clear evidence is that father has not showed/ proved to a court his “parenting capacity” to keep a child with him. And father’s behaviours, alcoholism reactions etc is unknown to court . So no lawful or real court will put a child’s life in such possible harm especially by making him live without his mother’s care of past 9 years which child is used to- No matter what..! That document also says child’s mother is not allowed to visit child’s school..!!! Everyone found this extremely strange.! Because i am highly concerned about my child’s safety and wellbeing, I have put up my story in my face book so that this never happens again to any more innocent children and I can rescue my child.

  141. Thanks Len. May we ask you if Oliver is scared of you by any chance? We may have information that could be very beneficial to you which has been passed on to us by a member of the public?

  142. Dear all,
    we urgently need any documents that have HHJ Simon Oliver’s Handwriting on them.
    DO NOT POST ANY IMAGES HERE

    We need anything you have, be it him writing a small note, his signature on an order or draft, or a letter or even his initials in his handwriting will be exceptionally useful for us moving forward to expose him..
    Or If you feel one of your solicitors (or if you are a solicitor or Barrister) and something like this from a case, please scan or photograph and send us a copy asap.
    If you feel uncomfortable on a document with your name , you may black out any names which could recognise you, but we need to see his handwriting for comparison with a document that has come to light.

    Any courageous attorney at law who has something in HHJ Olivers handwriting, (no matter how limited) please send and black out your name and chambers, or anything else which could connect to you. We do not wish to put anyone in danger, or line of fire, but we must act against this Judge ASAP.
    We need help from those attorneys at law (or law enforcers/Court officials etc) who know what’s going on, are in fear to speak out, but can access his handwriting – Please scan and or photograph and send in confidentiality to
    crookedjudge1@gmail.com

    ALSO: All Oliver Victims please go to the questionnaire and fill it in.
    This questionnaire is helping us gather legitimate victims with irrefutable documentary evidence against HHJ Oliver .
    https://surveyhero.com/c/0170b856

  143. Why arm the enemy with any information? But I will say publicly, response is slowly recovering after that very dishonest note, addressed privately to you, but published here. It proved a little damaging and counterproductive in getting victims to come forward, which may have been the entire point of the exercise by that person, who is no doubt suffering dreadfully due to various Judges including Oliver.
    Just to be clear -I did after the fact, post evidence to L.L proving what was written in that ‘note’ ( published here) was malicious and far from factual . I sent evidence with time stamps of various emails, communications and calls (at my expense) to that person, proving that what was written in that ‘note’ was far from true. The only factual part is that I obviously do not use my real name here. And that was a perfect example of why we have created a multi layer security vetting system, to protect everyone who comes forward.

    The blog host has generously created a life raft for all Oliver victims. But now it is time for victims to work collectively bringing irrefutable evidence together to take this man down. It can not be done by individuals alone and Oliver and those protecting him know it.
    Regards and Thank you.

  144. What is Woofle about? Mrs. Sinclair
    I’ve been following this site for many years, and you’ll emerge from nowhere to demand evidence
    Do you really think it’s moving forward?
    and are you able to help in the legal system?
    Enter only one web to fill in forms ….wow ,… I heard everything, lol
    in theory, to strengthen your little ego to do something

    use of victim details for what exactly? are you in the position to pursue?
    All of these victims are more likely to succeed if they publish here, and continue to prosecute each individual, as this is more evidence than stagnant web forms

    Investigations were made, there were many perspectives on a solution that had proved unsuccessful, poor Len looked back on the years he needed to get this far
    and you can speed it up?

    I doubt that this dubious judge will be brought to justice, in particular you can take responsibility if you hide behind the screen, wake up

  145. What is needed is a strong, honest reporter who can actually take photos video footage and conduct live interviews with desperate parents who are so desperate that they camp in tents outside the court to recapture stolen children and demand justice
    A shame for the media not to help, but someone has to make it known, people need to be alerted to what’s going on

  146. Interesting post, there are many of late .
    One being the following, with my answers.

    Charles legal advocatesays:
    “October 14, 2019 at 4:44 pm
    What is Woofle about? Mrs. Sinclair I’ve been following this site for many years, ”

    There are followers and leaders in life.

    “and you’ll emerge from nowhere to demand evidence”

    You have no idea from where I “emerge” and neither have I ‘demanded’ anything.

    “Do you really think it’s moving forward?”

    Yes I do and would it move considerably smoother without destructive, fear-instilling posts such as yours – which only serve to discourages victims from taking supported action.

    “and are you able to help in the legal system?”

    Are you? Have you?

    “Enter only one web to fill in forms ….wow “… I heard everything, ”

    I fear you may not be actually ‘listening’ try applying more subtle lateral thinking and attention.

    “lol in theory, to strengthen your little ego to do something ”

    I fear the ego showing itself is not mine, this is about action, not words, not posts, nor egos and activists feeling somehow left out and needing to spitefully sabotage attempts to find a route to justice, by those who are not part of an ” activist “clique. Swallow YOUR ego and look at the big picture. Banners and noisy protests serve nothing but block traffic.

    “use of victim details for what exactly? ”

    again a question asked here which serves no purpose except to aid Judge Oliver.

    “are you in the position to pursue?”

    We hope to and that depends on the amount and quality of the evidence we manage to gather.

    “All of these victims are more likely to succeed if they publish here, and continue to prosecute each individual, as this is more evidence than stagnant web forms”

    Really? Your MO needs revision. You say you have been “following” for “many years”, have you as a “legal advocate achieved anything to officially expose the crimes of Judge Simon Oliver in those “many years” ? I am in no doubt your heart and mind has tried, but did you manage to even scratch him? Please inbox me on that.

    “Investigations were made, there were many perspectives on a solution that had proved unsuccessful, poor Len looked back on the years he needed to get this far and you can speed it up?”

    There is a difference between speed and effect. And Len is doing an amazing job. He, unlike you, takes action while encouraging and supporting the action of others.

    “I doubt that this dubious judge will be brought to justice”

    You personally may have given up, I do understand why one does, but do not discourage others from taking an alternative route, a route you have not explored or thought of. Maybe you feel excluded?

    ” in particular you can take responsibility”

    Interesting! You mean for the many victims that have so far been vetted and who are are silently gathering effective evidence? They are courageously taking responsibility for themselves and positive action – which may prove more effective than banners, megaphones and years of “following” this thread.

    “if you hide behind the screen”

    I do not “hide” I ‘think’ and do not leave information in places where it can used to destroy what we are attempting to do…..my priority is to protect the identity of the 32 Oliver victims who have had the courage to contact me so far, while organising ourselves where we can plan to take action as a group. I am merely providing the tools and lining up the ducks.

    ” wake up”
    is that for me or you?

    Sincere regards

  147. Wow ,Sinclair you are a feisty angry woman reading this is total negative ,
    with that attitude I certainly would tell you where to go
    I suggest less words more action and actually I stand by Charly jr
    who fought against OLIVER ,and still does ,
    as from the question where you come from so certain ? I like to know too ,
    and why are you so argumentative about every sentence of him ?
    he is actually in the position to help yet you try ripping his head off is a little nasty no wonder you got nowhere all those years
    instead hide in a different country under a different name

    as from Charly Jr yes he is a professional knowing he helps and had done so in the past
    yes he has the tools to do so ,
    he has helped me my 3 children are saved thanks to him ,thought we still work to get my husband who is placed unlawful in prison , obviously you had not experienced of such
    so less of the angry approach instead get our heads together find a real solution , come to the UK come stand with us in the courts each victims brings there doc and march to demand Justice so yes wake up ,… action less words ,!

  148. Personally, I find your postings to be the angry, negative ones. There’s always one in every crowd who sits on their backside criticising the efforts of others. Back off. You are getting on my nerves.

  149. Cant we all just get along? Everyone down here is a victim of Oliver in one way or another. Everyone has had different experiences with Oliver. Some people have had their children stolen, some people have had their homes stolen, some people have been falsely accused of being paedophiles when they are not. We can understand that some people have exhausted every single avenue that exists in the UK and still not received justice and therefore have lost confidence. Everyone down here should respect other people’s experiences as well. We are all supposed to be on the same side so let’s not start an argument off over trivial matters. The other lady who spoke against P Sinclair does not mean to sound rude but she has gone through a huge process with Oliver and has got nowhere with it. She needs our support just like everyone else down here.

  150. Haven’t we all been through a huge process with Oliver? Mine is 5 years and counting. Absolute devestation. Does Charles help everyone on this blog? Or are his services reserved solely for those who are deemed worthy?

  151. Not to be negative, but can Charles even be trusted. I never hear of lawyers willing to go head on with the judiciary. That’s the problem. The judges are bullies, and will make sure lawyers don’t win cases or get work.

  152. The lawyers do not work for their client, they work for the judge! It’s always been the case

  153. Dear all,
    Contrary to the survey having no purpose, it a very powerful tool to find victims with irrefutable documentary evidence to prove Oliver has broken the rules and possibly the law.
    We are seeking those with “irrefutable evidence” . This does not mean those victims without a forensic trail are less important, it just means for us to take Oliver to task we need documentary evidence. A group of victims with a mass of law and CPR breaches on the page can not be ignored. Individually it gets lost, enmasse with a group of victims with such evidince it is a poweful lever.

    When we have selected the group and evidence is sorted, we then go to next stage.
    The mainstream press are not interested in individual cases, their legal department will not let them publish stories that
    1, leave them open to litigation for libel
    2, that are not considered sexy enough to be news worthy or of public interest..
    Sadly, even while so many have suffered at the hands of Oliver, the mainstream media are not interested, unless we make it very palatable for them. And its not the job of the press to decipher unfair rulings from illegal rulings. That is our job.
    What could be newsworthy and safe for them would be the following headline;
    ‘Victims claiming judicial corruption prepare to file class action against one Judge’
    …..the group made up of 25 victims, have made a coordinated mass crime report to the police, along with what they claim is “irrefutable” documentary evidence of judicial wrongdoing and corruption – The group known as ******** claim to have suffered extreme loss and in some cases “irreversible damage”, due to “provable judicial wrongdoing and obstruction of justice” by HHJ Simon Oliver. Spokesperson xxxxxx told us “each and everyone of us have evidence of judicial wrongdoing in our cases which were before Judge Oliver at some time and each and everyone of us had asked for help and made individual reports to the JCO, our MP,s and the police, but all to no avail…… Due to a blog on the internet “judges behaving badly”, we found each other and decided to gather evidence as a group and expose this Judge, who has nefariously abused his position and power to hurt members of the public. There are many hundreds of victims out there, but many live in fear of retribution if they complain…..As yet we can not be sure what Judge Simon Oliver’s agenda was and is, but with this class action and hopefully with the support of honest law enforcement and the press watching, we will find out. ” Judge Oliver refused to comment.

    I hope that puts some concerns to rest as to reason for the survey.
    Genuine Oliver victims – please go and fill in the form (link below) if you believe you have good cause and evidence that HHJ Simon Oliver broke the law in your case.
    Those who do not have paper evidence to wrong doing, know that this will help all of us whether you are selected for the ” group” or not.

    Please be absolutely honest in the answers and know that you will at some point be asked to produce the documentary evidence in relation to what is ticked in the survey . If you are not sure if you have evidence, fill in the form and we will talk about it when we get to you.
    I just ask that you do not exaggerate or deliberately mislead in your answers, We need to be absolutely credible in what we take forward to police and press.

    Those who have been threatened we will need to see police reports and crime numbers.
    Know that you will at some point be asked to produce your ID. As no doubt Oliver will send stooges to attempt entry to the group and we need to know you are a legitimate victim of HHJ Simon Oliver.

    We also need a couple of volunteers to help with building and boiling down the case files. (which will be digital to start with) Law knowledge would be useful. Computer skills needed.
    We can only make this work if the action plan is watertight.
    We are only selecting people who can take the heat and not let down the group -by leaking inside information about the group/members and its objectives – such as what we have seen recently here on the blog. It only takes one person to ruin a plan. Loose lips sink ships. Kind regards.
    https://surveyhero.com/c/0170b856

    May be typos and repeats here – on small device.

  154. I know one outstanding one who I will not name on here who stands for what is right against all Judges and stood strong against Oliver even when he threatened to ruin this lawyers career and have them struck off. This is the ONLY one I have ever met in my years involved in the Courts.

  155. If this is true about Charles, that he is actually a lawyer/barrister and was suspended due to Oliver and threatened, he needs to email us at crookedjudge1@gmail.com
    Him being out the UK he is safe to talk.

    I do know Ella went to protest and was let down by all who said they would go. But protests serve nothing.
    I’m sorry you are having such a ghastly time.

  156. Who is the County Manager at central family court, could you please provide the name we need to inform him what is going on in that court which we are pretty sure the Court Manager doesn’t know about this corrupt judge Simon Oliver what is doing behind the court.

  157. Im sure he does know, this is why they are mysteriously not around when you want them to be!

  158. Hi Len Lawrence
    Can you give me some information on P Sinclair as am not sure if i should trust them? Considering you mentioned them first? Sorry for inconveniencing you? How did you meet Sinclair and how long have you known them? Have you met them personally and in person?

  159. I find it quite concerning that I ask len to respond and he still has not done so. Usually len is quite prompt. it could be that TVP and one of Oliver’s Stooges have gained access to len’s computer or digital equipment and have started posting using it and confirming they know who P Sinclair is. I don’t think I trust this Sinclair person to send my details to, not with the amount of police raids going on across the UK because of this website. I think I’ll take a pass on this one.

  160. Hi, I am more concerned that you are a plant by Oliver. Len Lawrence replies to emails promptly and I know he emails those involved with Sinclair almost daily on updates of the investigation. No one has hacked Len Lawrence’s accounts. If they had hacked him they would certainly not be posting documents, official emails and names exposing officials, who are involved in covering Oliver’s criminal activity. Lawrence (and others) are currently conducting a very effective and thorough attack on the TVP and Court failings, while exposing Olivers faux courts and more. Filling in a survey is not going to expose you to anyone. It gives the Sinclair team an idea of how many victims have proof to take Oliver and co down. So if you have some paperwork to prove Oliver has broken the law contact them. They will contact you after to check you are real and that you have papers which can help.
    Sinclair is vetting ‘supposed ‘ victims’ and is only working (moving forward) with ‘victims’ who pass their security methods. I have been in touch for other reasons (I am not an Oliver victim) and I know two people that have done the survey. One is now part of the investigation and the other was not accepted because he did n0t have any good proof of Oliver breaking the law. I know that Sinclair spoke to both these people on the phone more than once.
    Posts such as yours play into the hands of Oliver, as it make people afraid to come forward with proof which can destroy Oliver and his accomplices. I would be much more suspicious of you rather than Penelope Sinclair and others working hard to make that Oliver bastard accountable. I know who Sinclair is and the team is legitimate. You can be either part of the problem or the solution.
    Or more crudely, Put up or shut up!

  161. Just by way of clarification, I am not the one who is asking people to send the paperwork to me like you are or Sinclair is. My comment was simply that how can we trust this Sinclair with our paperwork? Surely if Oliver is using TVP to raid many people’s homes to get to the bottom of who and why so many people are writing about him on the internet, this can simply be someone related to him trying to gather evidence? Don’t you think? so my question is, why should we trust in Sinclair and what evidence do we have that this person is not related to Oliver or one of his stooges? I’m not saying it to get other people to not trust an investigation against Oliver but Oliver and his Stooges are known to lie to us and everyone else. Oliver and his friends have previously been impersonating on this website as well? We have never heard of this Sinclair person until recently? You can understand why I am asking all these questions before I send my own paperwork. If this is one of Oliver’s Stooges or TVP, I could get into trouble myself and possibly get everything blamed on me!

  162. Hasn’t Len Lawrence already confirmed P Sinclair as legitimate. Haven’t the blog owners? Is this an attack on them now? If they are both satisfied Sinclair is legitimate, why the constant doubt? Len is genuine and so his endorsement doesn’t need repitition or proof.

  163. So why has Len not replied back to my previous correspondence? I hope you understand where I am going with this? The blog owners have not personally met you but just taken Lens word for it.

  164. I agree. I won’t say any more, other than nobody is holding a gun to the person’s head to respond to P. Sinclair, so they should just shut up or support what is going on.

  165. Lem isn’t anyone’s personal secretary or verification service. The blog owners have confirmed her too. Why are you all not calling them into question? Len does not have to answer individually. He has posted his story for many years. The evidence is here and on other sites. There was also a documentary on carbin air poisioning. He is legit. If any of you have a problem with the survey after that then nothing will convince you and it’s unlikely you really want to help bring Oliver to task. It’s more risky posting personal stories here than directly to Len or P Sinclair because the information on here is deliberately public, for exposure.

  166. I didnt say that len is a secretary to anyone. Im concerned that the campaign he dished out against Oliver may have landed him in trouble with the authorities and Oliver’s stooges who are now posting using his name! They are known to do that to get someones identity online. Coming to think of it, Len still hasn’t replied! Im not convinced, sorry. I trust Len completely but I don’t know if he hasnt been in trouble recently as he is not replying.

  167. I suggest you simply don’t post anything here anymore, and stop upsetting the rest of us.

  168. Dear all, updates.

    we are starting to gather some good papers and I want to thank those who have given their trust. It’s a long slog, but we are making headway and the database has good bones. Now we need more documents.

    To be fair to the nervous person who posted above. I do understand your fear, however, the reason you never heard of me before is because I only came across Judge Oliver in the last year. We only learn of Oliver when we or those close to us have had nasty dealings with him. New victims are before him every day, so new names appearing here on the blog make sense. He has been getting away with what he does for a very long time now, but victims are piling up and unfortunately for him, those he hurts eventually find their way to this useful blog.

    Back to work;

    NEEDED – we are seeking a really bored talented web person, to help set up the website we wish to run in tandem with the press and police. Of course we have no funds, so it will be voluntary. It would be good that this person is a victim who is without evidence, but wishes to feel participant in the action against Oliver. (they will need to pass our security with evidence they were a losing party before Judge Oliver)
    They can email us here
    crookedjudge1@gmail.com

    ARE YOU A GENUINE VICTIM OF HHJ OLIVER MISCONDUCT OR HIS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?
    WHAT TO LOOK FOR

    below is the very basic Wiki definition for Judicial misconduct. Please read the following if you are unsure if you have evidence against him which may be used in a court of law or with police enforcement.
    It’s not enough you are unhappy with an unfair ruling by him, you must have genuine cause for complaint for us to add you to the database. You will need to have some paper evidence or similar (it may be digital). Then go to the survey and fill it in

    https://surveyhero.com/c/00117aa1

    and then we will contact you to discuss what you may, or may not have, as means of evidence.
    Thank you!

    JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT DEFINITION

    Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge’s obligations of impartial conduct.

    Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: “falsification of facts” at summary judgment); using the judge’s office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives; accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office; having improper discussions with parties or counsel for one side in a case; treating litigants or attorneys in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner; violating other specific, mandatory standards of judicial conduct, such as judicial rules of procedure or evidence, or those pertaining to restrictions on outside income and requirements for financial disclosure; and acting outside the jurisdiction of the court, or performance of official duties if the conduct might have a prejudicial effect on the administration of the business of the courts among reasonable people. Rules of official misconduct also include rules concerning disability, which is a temporary or permanent condition rendering judge unable to discharge the duties of the particular judicial office.

    Sincerely
    P. Sinclair.

  169. Dear P Sinclair
    I don’t trust what you say. Im sorry but why would you need a ‘bored talented web person’? I thought you were going to do all this on your own. You havent passed security yourself but you want us to go through a security process on the complete basis we were victims ourselves of Oliver. Sounds all Mickey Mouse tbh. Technically your just gathering documents and information and someone else will have to post it online but only if they confirm their identity. And lastly Len still has not replied. This is all very strange and I don’t trust it

  170. It’s you I don’t trust. There is always one like you in every crowd, working for the other side and trying to create doubt and mistrust. I think you need to be blocked from posting on this site. You are a troublemaker.

  171. THAMES VALLEY POLICE

    HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE, ARE, OR ARE ABOUT TO, SERVE PRISION SENTENCES BECAUSE OF SOME
    POLICE OFFICERS WITHIN THAMES VALLEY POLICE WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ?

    Finally, 16 August 2019 Thames Valley Police disclosed that they had known that since 2004 that I had
    been a patient subject to the Court of Protection. The Part V11 Medical Report had been held by: Solicitor
    Graeme S. Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors and barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers.

    In 2016 a review of my case was conducted by Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, Badge Number 4564
    Thames Valley Police, Reading CID. Det. Insp Nicholas Watts report identifed that since 2004 the law
    firm BP Collins Sollicitors, Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd, Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL had not disclosed
    to any court, the Court of Protection, Medical Certificate they held in November 2004, that had been
    issued to protect me. Solicitor Graeme S Fraser OGR Stock Denton LLP Solicitors London N3 1HF is of
    particular interest as is barrister Dominic Brazil, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    Tim De Meyer. Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice. Thames Valley Police.
    Former Det. Ch. Supt. Tim De Meyer, Head of Professional Standards from 2014 until 2017

    Following Mrs Justice Pauffley instructions to HHJ Simon Oliver in Febuary 2013 to re-transfer
    my case to the Civil Court of Appeal. In July 2014 under Det. Ch. Supt. Tim De Meyer, Professional
    Standards opened a Profesional Standards file to record the dealings with me (Mr Lawrence.)
    The file identity number is CH/01600/14

    The officers below from Thames Valley Police are of specific interest:
    Asst. Ch. Con. Tim De Meyer
    Det Supt Gill Wootton Rtd
    Det Insp Gavin Tyrrell (now Det Supt Gavin Tyrrell at City of London Police)
    Det Insp Mark Stevens Rtd ?

    There is no record to date of Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer informing the Court of Protction
    of Det. Insp Nicholas Watts report.

    I suggest that others of you undertake a Subject Access Request with Thames Valley Police. Its free !

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps What I have written on this site, is also within the Thames Valley Police diclosures to me.
    Disclosuers have identifed bulling within Thames Valley Police. In the case of Det Insp. Gavin
    Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit he was being directed by his Detective Superintendent
    Gill Wootton.

  172. Oliver recieved 20k in an envelope from me in 2017. Its was the social workers orders and the local authorities barrister confirmed thats what i have to do to get a ruling in my side

  173. Dear James,
    PLEASE email me crookedjudge1@gmail.com
    You can remain completely anonymous while emailing me initially and we can get you immunity from any prosecution if you choose to move forward. Testimony like yours is vital to helping take down a very dangerous judicial network which is not only destroying families, lives and livelihoods, but also endangering children.
    Ignore the trolls here, who are trying to sabotage investigations into Judge Simon Oliver and Co. Email us.

  174. To the blog hoster
    I would like to remain private at this stage. May i ask what it would take to take this blog down? How much money would you like?
    Kind regards

  175. Has anyone read this Telegraph article?

    Big money to be made in the adoption trade
    If ever there was a scandal which called for the full glare of publicity it is the highly secretive system which allows thousands of children to be sent for forced adoption, writes Christopher Booker.
    Sir Bob Geldof who has attacked the UK’s ‘state-sanctioned kidnap’

    By Christopher Booker

    6:32PM BST 19 Jun 2010

    On June 3, a 17-year-old Staffordshire girl, living with her parents and seven months pregnant, was horrified to receive a letter which began: “Dear Corrinne, I am the new allocated social worker for your unborn child. We have serious concerns about your ability to care for your unborn baby. We are so worried that we intend on going to Court to apply for an Order that will allow us to place your baby with alternative carers.” This so shocked the family that they raised what money they could and, like many others faced with similar threats, escaped abroad, where they now live in circumstances hardly conducive to a happy delivery of their new child.

    Staffordshire social workers were also involved in the tragic case of Maureen Smith, the mother so desperate at the prospect of losing her two children that she fled to Spain, where she killed them before attempting suicide. As she wrote in her suicide note: “Social Services In Staffordshire and their policy of forced adoption are responsible for this.”

    These are just two instances of the vast, long-running tragedy which Bob Geldof, launching a report last December on the “barbaric” chaos of our family law system, called “state-sanctioned kidnap”, whereby social workers, abetted by family courts and an army of complicit lawyers and “experts”, routinely snatch children from loving parents to feed the maw of the adoption and fostering industry.

    Yet contrast this with last week’s report exonerating Kirklees social workers from any failings in the case of Shannon Matthews, the Yorkshire girl made subject, after years of neglect and ill-treatment, to a fake kidnap by her mother (described by local police as “pure evil”). Even though no fewer than 22 agencies had been involved with this dysfunctional family over many years, the report found that Shannon’s treatment did not justify taking her into care.

    If ever there was a scandal which called for the full glare of publicity it is the highly secretive system which allows thousands of children to be sent for forced adoption, often on no proper pretext. Meanwhile the list of cases where social workers ignore all evidence in allowing the abuse of children to continue, grows ever longer.
    Related Articles

    David Cameron learns who’s in charge 19 Jun 2010

    The parents who have little hope of getting a fair trial in Britain 26 Jan 2014

    Being green will not get us out of the red 19 Jun 2010

    It is not generally appreciated how adoption and fostering, organised by social workers, have become big business – quite apart from the fees charged by those lawyers and experts who are part of this corrupt system. Adoption payments and access to a wide range of benefits can provide carers with hundreds, even thousands of pounds a week. Still to be found on the internet (see the Forced Adoption website) is an advertisement by Slough Family Placement Services headed “Balloons and family fun to promote fostering”. This promised that Slough’s town square would be “bustling with activities including face painting and balloon modelling”, complete with a “David Beckham lookalike” (“bring a camera”), to launch “a new fostering allowance of £400 a week”.

    I have recently reported the harassment and repeated arrests of Mauren Spalek, the devoted Cheshire mother whose two younger children were taken from her in 2006, and who faces trial on June 29 on a criminal charge of sending her son a birthday card. Last week it emerged, from an official register, what the occupation is of the woman who adopted her stolen children. She is a social worker.

    Christopher Booker

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7840626/Big-money-to-be-made-in-the-adoption-trade.html

  176. Thanks Len, I re posted ….

    On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 4:03 PM judges behaving badly – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIM

  177. Hello James
    I am not surprised to hear that social workers are involved in that issue, we as the neighbours we have two social workers by name Nancy Magon registered number SW 100777 she works in Slough now and Michelle Amanda Watson registered number SW 83901 she works in Headington, these two social workers have been abusing class A drugs for so many years and still there working for LA with vulnerable children. I wonder how can they make good decisions to vulnerable children whom they are working with, it’s ridiculous.

  178. Here more
    1st West Berkshire Social Services are Short staffed putting our children into danger by leaving it to unvetted random Agency workers who step in when it comes to contacts beside there can take your child out for a day as and when which is a big concern to any parents
    2015 the Ofsted quote ‘inadequate which still stands and gone worse since
    of course no one like to admit so to little tweaking of alteration review stand as good
    Far from

    Foster parents are often antisocial people giving a second chance by the Judge Oliver who reward them and the social worker with drugs

    the head of West Berkshire Council Children and Family Services
    Dr Mac Heath, has no interests to support maternal families he talks about our vision for the future and why it’s a great time to come and work for us.
    he speaks about supporting foster ,staff and building relation on top investing he does not mention support to real parents

    In our experience, he does not take anything from the parents of a detained child on board and redirect any correspond to an unqualified person in the filing department

    Melody Arnold she uses her own child to campaign/ advertise to self centre mission gaining info fo from public to sound clever but she is not she does more harm than anything by removing children and isolate parents ,

    melody arnold@IamMelodyA
    Aspiring Socialist, Social Worker, Feminist, mother, cook, housekeeper, entertainer. Trying to remain hopeful in the face of perpetual disappointment.
    Newbury, Berkshire Joined June 2009

    Jade Robinson is the runner you’ve made friends with, but … it’s dyslexic to write reports
    where then Reading Council Legal Team Distinguish from Newbury Council Twist, then your evidence for your fall? Perfect for all legal proceedings as you do not understand the creative legal jargon multiply alias to your person and name are created to not direct but direct attack you so you have no chance in any court proceedings to succeed

    Child Protection. Children and education. 0118 937 3641 (01344 786 543 out-of-hours emergencies only)
    revised statutory direction issued to Reading borough council due to poor performance in children’s social care services.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revised-direction-issued-to-reading-borough-council–2

    contacts made usual in the Thatcham centre or at a rundown dirty little council house at
    73 Fifth Rd, Newbury RG14 6DT a complaint made as it appears unhygienic and dodgy
    the outside dirty bins displayed big potholes untidy hedges , tiny dirt unkempt overgrown weed garden
    the inside is little bit tidy now still cluttered with baby toys not appropriate for teenagers and often 3 older men sitting in a close room next to living room listen in when time up parents has to leave 1st
    so I leave the rest to your imagination what will be with your teenager children
    as there seem to specialize age group 10 -16 under protection …so not ….
    also thee call it therapy on 1st floor we wondering what sort ?agin leave it to your imagination dodgy as for sure ,

    https://youtu.be/jzqiPfa2XeI
    this link a story of social services get involved as mother s doing homeschooling and also working to much till mum gave up work hence monies restriction

    https://youtu.be/Ix8tB7_K7hA another story how social services stealing children

  179. This Melody Bitch started 4 years ago with my case. She was just a beginner. and has brown hair. in beginning, she was just super friendly
    her job was only Supporting contacts, nothing else when made phone calls to her, she angered easily and tries to dominate you by belittling reminding you, that you have nothing and how stupid you are
    then behind your back, she makes friends with your children take information to turn into lies finding dirt on you to satisfied Oliver when confronted,
    She hesitated and came out with insults and further lies
    The ugly slut is angry and seeks revenge on innocent families her own relatives are in prison for beating children up another was crippled by heavies tell them to back off, as gangs were created made up by rebelling teenagers who then continue the relative’s little dirty work
    burned-out cars, breaking into homes bully people to buy stuff etc so
    people demanded justice when it came to terrorise old people with serval assaults on young girls, brrr now you know who we are dealing with

  180. Dear All
    We have received information from one of our supporters who has given us another name and stated that Simon Oliver wants this person charged and convicted on false evidence. This information has come from an inspector level in Thames valley police. The name of this person who is a victim of Simon Oliver is named as Tim Beaconsfield. Please be aware everyone because a criminal is at it again. We have been given more information on Simon Oliver as well which we are not making public just yet but it is something that the media would definitely be interested in. It involves criminal activity in the High Court.
    From the team at judges behaving badly.

  181. In reference to the last post ” We have been given more information on Simon Oliver as well which we are not making public just yet but it is something that the media would definitely be interested in. It involves criminal activity in the High Court.”
    Could the blog writers please get in touch . Head subject of email as ” JBB” Thank you

  182. I too have a horrible time at the Fith street * filth street*
    the place is a rundown council house at the end of a street full of huge potholes
    the house itself placed behind a high untidy hedge at the front door there are bins and plastic bags full of rubbish some are ripped and rubbish all over,

    when entered the house a man with loads of scars on his arms opened then another one similar to Oliver LOOKALIKE JUST YOUNGER AND BLACK HAIR same fat came to support him then another old guy came from upstairs and an old woman accordingly a social worker well a woman in her 70
    my 1st impression of how many people are in this little 2 bedroom house
    when I suppose to meet a support worker and my child only,

    the hallway stunk of sweat, it is cluttered up and the dining room I guess, is empty just a couple of chairs stuck up, the kitchen small and loads of washing in a basket, dirty dishes on the surface and in the sink

    the living room cluttered up with baby toys all on display and stuffed in corners,
    cheap outdated plastic table cloths on the table broken chairs and two highchairs are
    the curtains again dirty ripped and outdated, looking at the small garden from patio doors well the windows greased up and absolutely filthy is overgrown .fences collapsed and faeces from either cat or dog bout

    every time on contact an agency worker turn up with your child you are not allowed outside, psychical contacts forbidden and not allowed to speak from home
    neither from the past present or future
    ever so often you hear loud noises from upstairs stamping ie whatever

    then parents are asked to leave 1st while your child is inside with all those people as accordingly upstairs is an office and a therapy room run by that old couple
    while the two younger ones snooping around downstairs
    at other times, old men sitting the whole time in the empty dining room for the whole 1 hour contact and ever so often the agency worker again an old woman disappeared to them then rush in to push you out the door

    this is too bizarre and god knows of what is going on it makes anyone uneasy the strange thing is when going there as in no contact the house sitting empty not one person around, figure it out (a grooming process )

    I have a real concern for all children so beware whoever has a contact at that dodgy house try to stay behind protect your child of those preditors

  183. FROM: Leonard Lawrence

    TO: CHIEF CONSTABLE, JOHN CAMPBELL, Thames Valley Police
    DEPUTY CHIEF CONSTABLE JASON HOGG, Thames Valley Police
    ASSISTANT CHIEF CONSTABLE, TIM DE MEYER

    IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH, ASSISTED BY DETECTIVE INSPECTOR NICHOLAS WATTS

    FORMER DETECTIVE INSPECTOR GAVIN TYRRELL, WHEN HEAD OF THE ECONOMIC
    CRIME UNIT, THAMES VALLEY POLICE, HAD NOT DISCLOSED DET. INSP. WATTS
    SUMMARY OF ISSUES IN 2016. GAVIN TYRRELL IS NOW T/DETECTIVE SUPERINTENDENT
    GAVIN TYRRELL, CITY OF LONDON POLICE, HEAD OF CITY AND NATIONAL LEAD FORCE
    FRAUD TEAMS.

    19 AUGUST 2019 THAMES VALLEY POLICE DISCLOSE THE FOLLOWING:

    Internal review by Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 Reading CID.

    Re: Leonard Lawrence

    Summary of Issues February 2016

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife,
    they apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven misdiagnoses that he is
    bipolar and hypermanic BP Collins (Solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that
    Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is therefor under the Court of Protection

    (BP Collins referred to above is: BP Collins Solicitors, Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd,
    Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL)

  184. FTAO Dr David Staples Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)

    To Len,

    From genuine and truthful Freemasons :-

    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself
    by ruining the lives of others against all Masonic and ethical principles. Indeed if you
    read the Charge after initiation, every Mason has a personal responsibility to behave in
    a manner which is ‘useful to mankind and become an ornament to the society’

  185. To: Dr David Staples Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)

    FROM: British Airways crew member

    Hello Leonard,

    I am a British Airways crew member, I have followed your story on Plane Concern and I am
    so sorry about what has happened to you…

    I have noticed that the judge that dealt with your case was Judge Simon Oliver from Reading Court.

    I have huge concerns regarding his honesty and integrity as a judge.

    I just thought I would mention it as my heart stopped when I saw it.!

    Thank you for sharing your own personal story and I hope we can all work together well to bring
    about positive changes into air travel .

    Take good care of yourself.

    Australia
    Decisions Justice view
    High Court Victory – view
    District Court of Western Australia – view
    East-West Airlines vs Turner – view
    Settlement Agreement Ansett 1993 /2007 (1)
    Settlement Agreement Ansett 1993/2007 (2)
    Senator OBrien Speech Senate / August 2007
    Senator OBrien Extract p.1-4 /September 2007
    Review of Evidence 2009 – entire report (copy)

  186. To: Dr David Staples Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    Case: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938
    HHJ Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.
    ———————————————————–
    Stephen Moyes The Sun newspaper 10 Nov 2019
    British Airways struck by 85 ‘toxic fume scares’ in just two months

    British Airways Crew
    Len .
    Thank you so much for your information. Your story should be made into a Hollywood movie .
    I’ve never heard of such a sick scandal . You have been abused mistreated and tortured.
    I know now they can never touch you again .
    ———— ————————————————–
    Email: Thames Valley Police to Devon and Cornwall Police
    Disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.
    Entry 11/06/2013 21:05:49 Devon and Cornwall Police.
    This is all connected with a case were a large number of airline pilots received brain damage
    from the ingress of organophosphate into aircraft cabins. Mr Lawrence is such a victim and
    has received brain damage.

    It is not only airline pilots that are being poisoned by Toxic Cabin Fumes, around 190,000
    passengers are being taken ill each year.

  187. I also had experiance with Judge Oliver asking me in a case management hearing that I need to post my passport to Reading court addressed to Cutts for identification purposes. He said he couldn’t do it in person in court because of time restrictions. I sent it recorded delivery and it was delivered next day but strangely passport was missing and Cutts never ‘received’ anything. In another case management hearing, Judge Oliver said not to make an issue about the passport and notnto report it stolen yet and it will ‘turn up’. It eventually did turn about 3 months later. The next thing i know i had bank accounts opened in Reading branches with Nationwide and Lloyds as it came in my credit file. Its strange all this happened when it was out of my possession at Judge olivers request. Im not sure what this crook is doing but stealing passports and opening up bank accounts is sure to do with money laundering under other peoples names. What happens when the person whose name the account is under gets caught? They will be in prison and then their children get taken in to care!

  188. He said that he needed the passport so that I can prove my identity during the course of the litigation. He also asked me for my national insurance number in court and I have no idea why he wanted either of them. I know on the claim form it asks for your national insurance number but I still do not understand why he required the passport? I know someone else who commented on this site as well saying that there passport went missing and then mysteriously returned a few months later

  189. Tried to get the Chief Constable to order an investigation into the serious crimes committed by Oliver, against myself.
    Professional Standards offered to assist if I brought a complaint against a junior officer; (I sensed a trap).
    I refused and said I commended him for his honesty. The officer had stated that Oliver had clearly committed an offence.
    Standards went ahead with a complaints procedure against the officer.
    They used this procedure as a vehicle, to say that: they “will not investigate Oliver at Reading Court”, that this decision is final, and is binding on all other Thames Valley Police departments.
    (without an investigation there cannot, of course, be a prosecution).
    The wording of the Decision Letter prevents any investigation of Oliver regardless of who makes the complaint.

    Through this decision letter they have given Oliver the same immunity from prosecution as in the John Downey case.
    In the Downey letter the police had said they would not prosecute him. They did, however include a clause that they may prosecute if evidence of other crimes came to light. This clause now enables them to commence extradition proceedings. There was no such, safeguard clause, in Professional Standards’ decision letter.
    The only way the decision can be overturned, is by judicial review.

    With the police protecting Oliver there is very little chance of bringing him to justice!

  190. That’s a very good idea. The British legal system appears to be nothing but an organised crime gang involved in the removal of children from their families.

  191. To: Steve

    Thames Valley Police, Professional Standards Department.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine, is the present head of the Professional
    Standards Department at Thames Valley Police. However, Det. Ch. Supt Paine has
    been handed a poisoned chalice.
    —————————————————–
    Headlines from the : The Guardian newspaper, 18 May 2016
    “May: police are failing abuse victims
    Home Secretary rails at ‘shameful attitudes’ in forces

    FORMER CHIEF CONSTABLE, FRANCIS HABGOOD, THAMES VALLEY POLICE.

    Francis Habgood, retired as Chief Constable at the end of March 2019. However in June 2019
    Francis Habgood was appointed independent chair of Buckinghamshire Safeguarding Boards
    Safeguarding Children Board (BSCB)
    Safeguarding Adults Board (BSAB),

    The role,to promote and safeguard the welfare of Buckinghamshire children and adults, both
    protecting the vulnerable from abuse and neglect and helping them get the most from life.

    Chief Constable in Thames Valley Police
    “I have spent my whole career protecting the most vulnerable members of our society”.

    Thursday, February 15 2018
    ​Sir Thomas Winsor, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary
    THAMES Valley Police are failing to record more than 35,000 crimes per year,
    including serious crimes such as rape, sexual offences, domestic violence.

    Thames Valley Police: Crime Data Integrity inspection 2017
    Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary
    Only 9 of 20 vulnerable victim crimes were recorded

  192. We will bring him to justice soon take my words, he has damaged life of innocent children an Angels for many years due to his false and fabricated judgement after receiving money, those tiers of my child, emotional harm and sychological torture Oliver will pay on this earth, in jesus name just watch he will die in jail, life in prison.the God will not let him continue damage innocent children , soon you will see what happen to him.

  193. pgm@berkspgl.org.uk

    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons
    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road
    Sindlesham
    Wokingham
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Dear W Bro Howlett-Bolton,

    Re: Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    W Bro Howlett-Bolton, I understand that you were a former Chief Superintendent with
    Thames Valley Police, based in Reading, Berkshire. Thereafter you served as a Deputy
    Chief Constable with Bedfordshire Police Force (1998-2000).

    W Bro Howlett-Bolton, I have still to establish what prompted Thames Valley Police to
    disclose on the 19 August 2019 Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 Internal review,
    given that Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of the Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley
    Police, had chosen not to disclose to me the findings of Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts,
    DI 4564 Internal review in 2016.

    Thames Valley Police Subject Access Request
    (Disclosed 19 August 2019)
    2016 Internal review by Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 Reading CID.
    Re: Leonard Lawrence
    BP Collins (solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject to
    a Part V11 order and is therefore under the care of the Court of Protection.

    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Thank you to some members of the Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 for their support.
    “Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself
    by ruining the lives of others against all Masonic and ethical principles. Indeed if you
    read the Charge after initiation, every Mason has a personal responsibility to behave in
    a manner which is useful to mankind and become an ornament to the society”

    Yours respectfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps
    Independent Office of Police Conduct, United Kingdom Reference: 2838/2015

    There is also the matter of defamatory statements having been entered into the police
    computer, which may have been instrumental in blocking Mr Lawrence from receiving
    the investigation to which he is entitled, and it is to be hoped that these statements will
    be removed completely.

  194. If the media would be interested in it, will it be passed on for exposure? When will these information disclosures be made available on the blog?

  195. Do you have hard evidence they are drug abusers? I don’t doubt it mytself but is it something that could be proved as surely that’s a criminal offence? They must be getting their supply from someone………

  196. Not trying to sound funny but does this horse nostril judge Oliver still live in waterloo with his rent boy?

  197. Leornard Lawrence your case Imran Khan QC is the best person to instruct, his solicitor firm is called Imran Khan Solicitors, he has been dealing with investigations in the government bodies including police, judges who are corrupt, Local Authorities and so many public bodies who have done wrong to individuals.

    Also write your story and put to crowdjustice to raise fund to pay for legal fees, your story will attract many people to crowdfund including me, you will have enough money to pay your case private, then you can take Imran Khan QC to deal with your matter, though he does Legal aid cases as well. It’s straight forward they will find this BUSTARD Oliver guilt and put him to jail.
    Imran Khan is the one who deal with Stephen Lawrence case where the police & judges were corrupted but Imran managed to put them accountable and those involved were jail.
    Imran does not fear any one even government bodies he stands only for truth and justice, he is the top Human rights solicitor in London. Top solicitors firm in London always recommend people to him.

  198. CrowdJustice is now part of Legl

    Get funding, take legal action
    Public and private crowdfunding for legal issues big and small

    Featured in:
    BBC Financial Times Forbes The Guardian The Law Society Gazette The Evening Standard
    We’ll guide you through legal funding
    Built by lawyers, CrowdJustice is the leading online fundraising platform specifically designed for legal action.

    Raise funds and support with a public or private fundraising page.

    Private and public cases
    Never fundraised before? No problem.
    Raising funds on CrowdJustice works for all kinds of issues, large and small.

    Our experienced team will support you in building your page and help you towards fundraising success.

    Matthew and Maeve being helpful
    We partner with lawyers and make funding simple
    Trusted by lawyers across the country, CrowdJustice’s donation-based funding is a proven way to pay for legal services.

    A map
    Featured pages
    A wide variety of legal matters successfully raise funds on CrowdJustice. These are just a few examples.

    £10m
    Raised

    200,000+
    Backers

    500+
    Fundraising pages

    4 in 5
    Hit funding target

    Learn more about fundraising on CrowdJustice
    Whether you want to take legal action for yourself, a family member, your community or the whole country, CrowdJustice helps you raise funds for legal services.

    Access to our fundraising tools and support from our dedicated team make it easy to fund your legal matter.

    Download resources on screen

    CrowdJustice makes legal action possible

    Any questions?
    Crowdjustice logo
    © 2019
    All rights reserved
    The Justice Platform Ltd is registered as a company in England and Wales, company number 9534141

  199. Leonard Lawrence see the above information about CrowdJustice, I will support you to raise fund, just put your story at crowdjustice. Your will succeed to get justice you need.

  200. To: The Detective Sergeant working within a multi-agency safeguarding hub in xxxx Berkshire.

    Ref: THE judges behaving badly WEBSITE.

    Detective Sergeant I have been given sight of a number of emails, including one sent by yourself
    on the 20 November, 2019. Your comments are not helpful.

    Your comments are also offense to many that have posted their experiences on this website:
    judges behaving badly WEBSITE.

    The judges behaving badly WEBSITE would not exist had it not been for the failings of Thames
    Valley Police, Protecting Vulnerable People team, and the failings of multi-agency safeguarding.

    The Provincial Grand Preceptor , Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.
    BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Berkshire, RG41 5EA

    Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver, has/had a very effective tool at silencing
    his vulnerable victims, the use of Civil and Extended Civil Restraint Orders. How can these victims
    talk to the police when they are under threat of imprisonment and the seizure of they asserts if they
    talk about their cases ?

    Detective Sergeant, it is not Thames Valley Police that is now investigating WM HHJ Simon Oliver,
    it is Simon Oliver’s many victims, their families and friends, also retired and serving police officers.
    Some of these police officers have, and still do, server with Thames Valley Police. Some of the officer’s
    are senior to you by some considerable margin.

    Quote: He had, as one of his officers said ,’stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’. Why?

    There is culture of bullying within Thames Valley Police, as evident in my own case. The now former
    Detective Superintendent Gillian Wootton, Head of Specialist Operations and Covert Policing, Thames
    Valley Police is a prime example. In the background giving instructions to Detective Inspector Gavin
    Tyrrell to stop my case being investigated, in-order to save her own career.

    Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg are presently holding a
    Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, issued in 2005, that was never disclosed to the court of
    Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ——————————————————————————–
    Detective Sergeant
    Thames Valley Police and multi-agency safeguarding hub in …. Berkshire.

    Oxford child sex abuse ring
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In March 2015, a report revealed that more than 300 children, mostly girls from the city of Oxford,
    could have been groomed and sexually exploited in the area. It accused the Thames Valley Police,
    then led by Chief Constable Sara Thornton, of disbelieving the girls and failing to act on repeated
    calls for help, and Oxfordshire Social Services of failing to protect them despite compelling
    evidence they were in danger
    Eight further men have been convicted in 2018.[6]

    ———————————————————————————
    Thames Valley Police: Crime Data Integrity re-inspection 2019

    In November 2017, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services
    (HMICFRS) conducted a crime data integrity inspection of Thames Valley Police.

    We published the report of this inspection in February 2018 and concluded that the force’s crime
    recording arrangements were not acceptable. As a result, we gave Thames Valley Police an overall
    judgment of inadequate.

    Our 2018 report gave numerous recommendations and areas for improvement aimed at improving
    crime recording in Thames Valley Police. This re-inspection, completed in May 2019, assessed the
    progress made since that report.

    Our findings and judgment resulting from this re-inspection are set out below.
    We examined 22 vulnerable adult victim records. Unusually, there were no crime reports in them.
    We also examined 25 vulnerable child records in which we found seven crimes that should have
    been recorded. But the force had only recorded four. The unrecorded offences included:

    sexual activity with a child under 13;
    assault occasioning actual bodily harm; and
    injury caused by a dangerous dog.

  201. Dear Len
    Can you please send me your E-Mail address? Oliver has me in the High Court and pursuing an Injunction against me saying i am responsible for this site. The Ministry of Justice is financing this private litigation, the Government Legal Department is representing Oliver and the Court Judges are colluding with Oliver privately. Oliver claims everything on this site has been made up by me and you do not exist. Apparently Oliver is a bag of sugar! If you send me your E-Mail address, i can send you the entire documentation which may assist you in your investigations. Can P Sinclair also contact me as well and i will do the same. Best not to keep High Court proceedings secret anymore in the interest of Oliver but against public interest.
    Kind regards

  202. From: Leonard Lawrence
    To: J December 4 2019 at 5:31pm

    I understand that there is a court order that you have to take down the
    judges behaving badly Website, or go to prison. Also substantial legal costs have been placed
    upon you.

    Like you, I also have been falsely accused of being the owner of this website.
    Could you advise me of the name of the judge, the barrister and solicitors that acted against you
    so that I also can prepare a defence as and when is necessary. It would also be helpful if I could
    have sight of your documents.

    The Provincial Grand Preceptor of Berkshire, Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.
    BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Berkshire, RG41 5EA

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver was on the 30 August 2012 entirely satisfied that:
    As an ex-serviceman (Royal Navy) with an acquired Brain Injury from exposure to organophosates,
    and identified as extremely vulnerable (former Chambers of Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC and
    Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC) whilst subject to the Court of Protection (Thames Valley Police 2016)
    I was asset stripped and evicted onto the streets Buckinghamshire and left to die, whilst lacking
    mental capacity !

    Not all of Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, masonic friends support his view !

    On the 19 August 2019 Thames Valley Police disclosed the following about myself Leonard Lawrence.

    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 Summary of Issues February 2016
    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife, they
    apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and
    hypermanic. BP Collins (Solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject
    to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the care of the Court of Protection”.

    —————————————————

    The information below has been sent to me, to forward, as it may be helpful to the owner/s of this
    website.

    Dear Mr Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    It has been brought to my attention that you have expressed an interest in a publication,
    in particular the website – https://judgesbehavingbadly.com/

    Can you please indicate each of the pages that interests you (use url’s) and specify the
    commentary you wish to address.

    The website I believe is created around factual information that is substantiated through
    auditable evidence.

    The website is acting to expose corruption and crimes, and bring these matters to the police
    and other authorities – especially those overseeing the judiciary.

    Please state your evidence in each of the matters you refer to.

    The general public MUST HOLD THE JUDICIARY TO ACCOUNT BY SCRUTINY with factual
    evidence – that is statute, and the website is adhering to statute. If you have evidence
    that shows that things are wrong, then please supply the evidence in an auditable trail.

    Yours faithfully,

  203. Hi Len,
    I have sent all documents to P Sinclair
    I can forward to you as well. Whats your E-Mail address? Can you also leave you number as well and I can call or give to P Sinclair to E-Mail me
    Kind regards

  204. J.
    The following will be of assistance:
    It shows how vital this site is; it is the only way that the voices of victims can be heard.
    In my case I was prosecuted by Wiltshire Council for a health and safety offence.
    The prosecutor conceded at appeal, a formal not guilty verdict was made; Wiltshire Council acknowledged that the prosecution was without reasonable and proper cause.
    The prosecution had been brought out of spite, by a junior official when she was employed by Salisbury Council.
    The charge was failure to comply with an improvement notice; the matter prosecuted was not even mentioned in the notice; even if it had been it did not constitute an offence. There was thus no bona fide reason to prosecute, this is sufficient in law to demonstrate malice.

    Under such circumstances, the Supreme Court has ruled that a claim for compensation must be allowed to proceed.
    This is where Wiltshire Council and HHJ Simon Oliver got to work.
    An application was made to have the claim thrown out; at Reading county court family law centre 75 miles from the council’s base in Trowbridge.
    A Deputy District Judge who sat on family law cases at Reading was provided as counsel for the defence.
    Wiltshire made an application, to Oliver, for an extended civil restraint order.
    He was not allowed to hear it as he is a designated family judge and under CPR was obliged to transfer the matter to a designated civil judge. He ignored this rule until challenged.
    He then claimed to have overcome this restriction by arranging to be appointed: a section 9 Deputy High Court Judge of the Queen’s Bench to hear the application and President of the Queen’s Bench (to re-constitute a District Registry of the High Court at Reading).
    J: I understand the Ministry of Justice is supporting the claim against you.
    In my attempt to get Thames Valley Police to prosecute Oliver; the MoJ had said that Oliver had been appointed to the Queen’s Bench. The police gave this as a reason not to prosecute. The MoJ later retracted and admitted that Oliver “is not currently authorised under s9 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 as amended by the Crime and Courts Act 2013 to hear cases in the Queen’s Bench Division”.
    However, they added: “he was temporarily authorised in 2014” (the year of my case).
    Under the amendments to the Senior courts act, only judges who have been selected to a panel by the Judicial Appointments commission, can hear such cases. The JAC have confirmed that they did not appoint HHJ Oliver to this panel.
    I hope you will use this information which demonstrates that the MoJ is prepared to make false claims; to deny the victims of Oliver, justice. Our only voice is this site.
    The MoJ has subsequently admitted that the information on his “appointment” came from Oliver himself; they have refused to provide a copy on the grounds that the “document” contains the personal data of the judge.

  205. People should be aware of the criminality taking place in the various courts, including the family court. Many of you may well have received notices to attend court FAR TOO LATE for you to respond or even attend. As a result, you will have lost your case. THIS IS DELIBERATE, and part of the criminal enterprises’ modus operandi. The corrupt players DO NOT follow the Civil Procedure Rules laid down by the justice system. They have people placed inside the system at strategic points who are also playing the game and covering up.

    Here is a video and a publication that might explain how the criminal enterprises get away with it. Nobody is auditing anything in the courts. Paperwork is back-dated or has not been completed in the prescribed legal order, there are no official embossed court seals, no signatures, wrong courts are used unlawfully with judges sitting without authority, and so on and so forth. They all know how to play the game. Justice Ministers know about this. Make no mistake.

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    THE FORENSICS OF LEGAL FRAUD: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ac2eb2g0l6f1awf/Forensics-of-Legal-Fraud-V1R2-v120110.pdf?dl=0

    See also

  206. Victims of justice system corruption need to be aware of a few things. Operation Tiberius was a Metropolitan Police investigation into corruption. In 2003, The Metropolitan Police published its findings in a report that clearly states that organised crime has infiltrated numerous public institutions, including police and THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Some of these criminals, according to the report, use FREEMASONRY and Masonic meeting places to make liaisons and collude with other criminals. I am not suggesting that all Freemasons are corrupt. I am just saying what is stated in the Operation Tiberius report. I have been led to understand that the Metropolitan Police have a list of corrupt judges. We are not aware of the Met having taken any action against any of the persons named in their report. Persons named in the report include members of major serious organised crime gangs who are/were at the time also very senior police officers.

    Crime and corruption in the legal system is accomplished in many ways. Some of the ways are to conduct nefarious activities in plain sight by abusing the regulations set down under Civil Procedure Rules for litigation. All players in the system know what is going on and accommodate irregularities in how the courts are used – such as not opening caseman files, for which a fee should be paid to the court, but simply starting litigation without a proper court file. They send out backdated notices to people to attend court, so that the person does not have enough, or in some cases any, notice. So they miss court and, as a result, lose their case because they failed to attend court. Criminals with law degrees then work together to deny rights of appeal, for example. Judges sit in courts that they are not authorised to sit in. Court documents are altered by the judges, and are not a true record of what has taken place. Official embossed court seals are missing from documents, as are judges’ signatures, and improper dates are used or there are no dates at all, along with improper courts.

    There are people placed in strategic positions everywhere along the litigation process and inside the courts. They assist and enable fraud and corruption. Nobody questions any irregularities, and there is no auditing of court process. The “little man” is taken for a fool and NOBODY in the land will conduct a LEGITIMATE investigation into alleged judicial or police misconduct or unlawful activity inside Britain’s courts.

    To illustrate what I am saying, please take a look at the following linkes. NONE OF THIS INFORMATION IS ISOLATED or a ‘one off’ example. It has been happening for decades in the courts and make no mistake about it it, it is organized crime, and the Ministry of Justice and the police are well aware of it.

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    THE FORENSICS OF LEGAL FRAUD: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ac2eb2g0l6f1awf/Forensics-of-Legal-Fraud-V1R2-v120110.pdf?dl=0

  207. To: Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    As you are aware this website is being monitored by Thames Valley Police and Government Legal Service.

    Matrix Chambers have placed the case below on their website under barrister Ben Silverstone.
    Oliver v Shaikh (2019): Harassment proceedings brought by a Circuit Judge relating to online publications.

    Like Shaikh, I also am accused of being the owner of the website: HHJ Simon Oliver, judges behaving badly.

    This website may have been the trigger for Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary 2017 review of Thames Valley Police.

    On the 9 September 2010 Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk, (Deputy High Court Family Judge) wrote to me advising that a member of his chambers, barrister Dominic Brazil, had advised Mr Anelay QC that I had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection when he (barrister Dominic Brazil) had placed Hundreds of Thousands of pounds in cost and adverse inferences upon me whist I was subject to the Court of Protection.
    The above information was available to Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver on the 16 April 2012

    Barrister Dominic Brazil, identified Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor, as the Government Legal Services lawyer that allowed him to asset strip me. Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT had worked as a solicitor in Reading, Berkshire, where Helen Clift had briefed barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 kings Bench Walk Chambers in her family law cases. Helen Clift then joined the office of the Official Solicitor, Government Legal Services. Barrister Dominic Brazil had me sectioned under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical and then placed under the control of Helen Mary Clift.

    Professional Standards Department, Thames Valley Police, have been withholding the above information from the court. Chief Constable John Campbell is presently holding one of the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that was used to hold me. This specific Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, was held by Helen Mary Clift.

    Christoper Brooker (7 October 1937 – 3 July 2019) journalist and author and a columnist for The Sunday Telegraph. frequently commented on the UK Family Courts and Social Services. He also commented on the above practice.

    About three weeks before the hearing before Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver, on the 16 April 2012 the Deputy Official Solicitor May Maughan, had release my case files to solicitor Paul Hick, Simpson Millar LLP. According to solicitor Paul Hicks, May Maughan admitted that solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor had agreed the sale price of my home and failed to obtain Court of Protection authorization. This can all be evidenced.

    Whilst Lesley Hyland the Internal reviewer at The Independent Office for Police Conduct was on maternity leave the internal Independent Office for Police Conduct case file on myself, Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall was released to me.

    The Crown Prosecution Service had reviewed my case and request Thames Valley Police, Legal Services Department, that I be visited. Devon and Cornwall Police files identify a PC Emma Pack, (now Sgt Emma Storey- Barrett) attended and spoke to me at length, PC Emma Pack then alleges that she emailed my account to Thames Valley Police.

    Thames Valley Police are unable to locate any email from PC Emma Pack, (now Sgt Emma Storey-Barrett) Devon and Cornwall Police. Devon and Cornwall Police, later telephone me admitting that:
    PC Emma Pack, (now Sgt Emma Storey-Barrett) never attended my home.

    PC Emma Pack, (now Sgt Emma Storey-Barrett) misconduct was covered up by the following police officers :
    Detective Superintendent Claire Armes, Devon and Cornwall Police (now with Avon and Somerset Police)
    Inspector Chris Shaw, Devon and Cornwall Police
    Inspector David Hammond, Devon and Cornwall Police
    Professional Standards, Devon and Cornwall Police

    The Independent Office for Police Conduct internal case file on myself, Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall is most revealing regarding the following officers
    Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer, former Head of Professional Standards at Thames Valley Police
    Detective Superintendent Gillian Wootton, Thames Valley Police (recently retired)
    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Thames Valley Police. (now a T/Superintendent City of London Police)

    Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General,
    I remain puzzled why solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP advised me to pay £10,000 when Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver had been instructed by Mrs Justice Pauffley to transference my case to the Court of Appeal in February 2013 ? I refused to pay the monies , which I did not have in any event. Then I was asked to sign a undertaking to pay the £10,000. Thereafter HM Procurator General the bullying started by two Government Departments the DWP and Revenue and Customs !

    However, it ended very suddenly when those associated without Security Services intervened. The Metropolitan Police, surprisingly, also refused to participate in my bullying. Detectives from the Metropolitan Police, Specialist Operations, SO xx invited me to Great Queens Street, London, for coffee. They also named the instigator of my bullying as Alastair Pitblado, Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts, who died on 24 June 2018. A confidential file was then sent to me.

    Zelilah Chadwick from the DWP ( I have been given her address) has been identified as the Civil Servant that placed the £8000 + fine against me following His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver being instructed by Mrs Justice Pauffley to transference my case to the Court of Appeal in February 2013. The DWP later admitted that the action had been malicious and set the £8000 + fine aside. The instructions had come from above.

    Then events with Mr Justice Adrian Fulford, now Lord Justice Adrian Fulford. In February 2013 Adrian Fulford had
    upheld a decision by Master Basil Yoxall, Queens Bench Division, London not to disclose my Court of Protection, Medical Certificates that he held to the Court of Protection, the Court of Appeal and the Family Division !!
    Master Basil Yoxall did not hold a Court of Protection authorization.
    The files held by Master Basil Yoxall and Mr Justice Adrian Fulford have been recovered for me and placed on my living room table by person or persons unknown.

    Rather than single out Shaikh it would be advisable for the Provincial Grand Preceptor of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver to speak to the former Grand Secretary of Berkshire Freemasonry David Keys. A search was undertaken at Reading County Court, not by Thames Valley Police, the evidence that HHJ Simon Oliver said in his judgement dated the 30 August 2012 I could not produce was located. HHJ Simon Oliver also had the evidence electronically
    on the 17 April 2012 !!

    It is a record of barrister Simon Calhaem, instructed by Government Legal Services informing HHJ Charles Elly and solicitor Graeme S. Fraser (BP Collins Solicitors) that Laurence Oates, Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court had NOT AGREED THE SALE VALUE OF MY HOME. HHJ Charles Elly warns solicitor Graeme S. Fraser that the Official Solicitor is not authorized to agree the sale value of my home. A few days later Graeme S. Fraser and barrister Dominic Brazil proceed with the sale of my home without Court of Protection authorization.

    Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service
    There was several attempts by Dina Rawal, Government Legal Services, to have me sectioned under the Mental Health Act. It was stopped by judges. Dina Rawal, Government Legal Services, file marked NOT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO DISCLOSED has also been sent to me. The file contains a report by a solicitor within Government Legal Services as to how solicitor Helen Mary Clift obtained my signature on Legal Aid Forms avoiding the Court of Protection !!

    Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General
    I have been issued with a special card endorsed by the National Police Chief Council. This should offer me more protection. With regard to the email I received below, I am not seeking any monies to expose those that abused
    me, in-particular Government Legal Services solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor, Detective Superintendent Gillian Wootton, Thames Valley Police, and not forgetting the Provincial Grand Preceptor of Berkshire Freemasonry, Worshipful Brother , His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    Yours sincerely,
    Leonard Lawrence
    ————————————————————————————–
    Subject: BOOK WORTHY STORY

    Dear ….
    Leonard Lawrence brain injury from organophosphate poisoning and Toxic Aircraft Cabin Air

    You will most likely have heard something about the story of Leonard Lawrence, ex Royal Navy, and medically retired commercial pilot. It is a massive story of crime and corruption involving the Official Solicitor, public and private lawyers, judges, court workers, police and some government ministers.

    It also involves anonymous and honest insiders sending leaked documents and information to Mr. Lawrence over a period of roughly 12 years, and a cover up of an international scandal by the British government concerning a widely used commercial aircraft design that causes permanent disability and death, both sudden and slow, and which has rendered pilots and flight crews unconscious during flights and left them with permanent brain injuries. The problem has also affected the passenger cabin. There has been a British government cover up of a secret agreement between the Australian government and British Aerospace in this matter, and Mr. Lawrence also has a copy of this agreement.

    Briefly, Mr. Lawrence is the victim of a brain injury involving organophosphate poisoning which caused him to be incapacitated and, as a result, forced his early retirement and a divorce. He was subsequently erroneously or deliberately treated for the wrong type of illness, and therefore with the wrong drugs, and kept semi-comatose for approximately 18 months. During this time, he was systematically and fraudulently asset stripped by the Official Solicitor and his staff, private lawyers, and the judiciary. The Official Solicitor refused him a guardian of his choice, despite the fact that his choice of guardian was a prominent surgeon (Mr Alastair Wilson FRCS FFAEM the founder of the London Air Ambulance) and other members of the community. This was so that the profits could be made by the culprits without any interference or advocacy for Mr. Lawrence. Mr. Lawrence was, while under the care of the Official Solicitor (not unlike another case of my knowledge), made homeless and turned into the streets without any income and left to his own devices. An attempt had also been made on his life when a mysterious fire broke out on the roof of his rented thatched cottage while he was in bed, and it burned to the ground.

    Fraudulent medical certificates were used so that the legal fraternity could keep control over Mr. Lawrence’s affairs without any questions being asked. They did not count on Mr. Lawrence recovering mental capacity, and having all the assistance that he has had that enables him to name his predators – and there are NUMEROUS of them involved in this criminal network. The secret family courts are a scandal, and have been used to asset strip people by falsely declaring them to lack capacity. The individual files in the Court of Protection and of the Official Solicitor are not audited by the National Auditor or any independent body, and yet the assets involved, collectively, are in excess of three billion pounds at any given time.

    The Official Solicitor is supposed to act as the Guardian of last choice but, according to former MP, John Hemming, yet is being used as the Guardian of first choice in many cases. If the Lawrence case is any example, then many thousands of people are being financially abused by this office.

    When Mr. Lawrence recovered mental capacity after professional intervention and a change in his treatment, he discovered his losses to be in excess of one million pounds, and he started to make inquiries and speak out. Thames Valley and Devon and Cornwall Police both colluded in a cover up of the crimes, and committed perjury and other serious criminal offences, which are provable with documentation. No investigation into the serious fraud against Mr. Lawrence was conducted.

    During this time, the Official Solicitor contacted various government departments and the Metropolitan Police, demanding that they “make life difficult for Mr. Lawrence”. The Metropolitan police, surprisingly, refused to oblige, but Mr. Lawrence was falsely accused of fraud and tax evasion by HMRC and DWP. They were all false allegations which came from someone in a very high position to be able to orchestrate both. Mr. Lawrence knows who it is exactly, and that there are commonalities between his case and that of other victims. HMRC and DWP eventually backed off and dropped the allegations with apologies.

    No matter where Mr. Lawrence turned, he was denied assistance. Were it not for the leaks and “off the record” assistance of honest persons inside police and the legal system, he would still be struggling for answers. It has taken 12 years, and now I feel the story is ready and worthy of a blockbuster book, such as The Untouchables. I feel that you would perhaps be a good author for a book such as this, provided a suitable arrangement and agreement can be reached with Mr. Lawrence.

    Mr. Lawrence has had help in compiling all his evidence from a team of retired detectives, some of whom were previously in very senior roles in Special Branch. Every one of his allegations is proven by documents, including whole files from the court that were recovered from the office of a corrupt judge who denied their existence. Pedophile Information Exchange judge – now advisor to the Queen – Lord Justice Adrian Fulford, who supported lobbying for the age of sexual consent for children to be lowered to four years, has also had his fingers in this case. I am advised by an ex Metropolitan Police detective that, besides the Operation Tiberius report, there was also a list of corrupt judges compiled by the Met. Your contacts may be able to assist in that matter, if required.

    If writing Mr. Lawrence’s story is something that might interest you, may I please have an expression of your interest by December 15, 2019, after which we will pursue other avenues if there is no interest. It is strongly believed that is a MAJOR public interest case that must be told, as Mr. Lawrence is not the only victim of the “Business Angels” – gangs of organised criminals with law and accounting degrees involved in economic crime. As you know, Operation Tiberius disclosed corruption in the legal system, and here is an absolutely perfect and foolproof example.

    Will you please also acknowledge receipt of this email?

  208. Victims of the courts and legal fraternity might like to be aware that there are prescribed rules and procedures for litigation. These are called Civil Procedure Rules. In order to commit fraud and other crimes IN PLAIN SIGHT, USING THE COURTS, criminals deliberately violate these rules. Of course, this is in addition to the ABUSE and MISUSE of gagging orders (or injunctions) issued by some judges to silence victims and conceal misconduct and corruption.

    One common trick is to send out court notices TOO LATE for the respondent (or victim) to attend a court hearing. We have even known them to be sent AFTER the court hearing without a date, and the date mysteriously appears on the document in the court file AFTERWARDS (if at all), having been backdated. The respondent, knowing nothing about the court hearing, does not attend court, so the judge therefore finds against them during the hearing. This trick is used over and over again. People have been completely bankrupted and left homeless as a result. There are documents WITHOUT embossed court seals, signatures, dates, and we have even seen forged documents them with the WRONG CROWN depicted in the Royal logo. Often the dates referenced in documents are fictitious. The judges EDIT court transcripts BEFORE they are sent anywhere and, as has already been pointed out on this website, the legal fraternity often do not speak to the judge in court but make hand signals so that the discussion cannot be recorded by the court reporter. Sometimes documents are forged completely and have never seen the inside of a court room.

    In order to start litigation, a file called the CASEMAN file must be opened and a fee paid. This file is given a number. Any subsequent documents after that must contain the reference number. This is often not being done and the court workers never question it or refuse to file irregular documentation. Officials need to be aware that not only does this practice enable fraud, but the Treasury is being cheated out of the court filing fee required to open the file. It is a cosy little arrangement that is taking place in every court in the land, and many of the players are very prominent law firms.

    Victims might like to get their files forensically examined for this type of corruption. In the meantime, here are some very interesting links. Using these links for information, victims of the British legal system would be wise to educate themselves and others as to what REALLY goes on in the British legal system. It is not just Russian McMafia that is abusing the legal system, although there may well be some crossovers.

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    THE FORENSICS OF LEGAL FRAUD: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ac2eb2g0l6f1awf/Forensics-of-Legal-Fraud-V1R2-v120110.pdf?dl=0

    This is not to say that there are no honest judges, court workers, lawyers, police, and public officials; there are. However, there is no auditing of individual court files, and the rules are being broken OVER AND OVER AGAIN with impunity. Lawyers soon learn which judges will do their bidding and which ones will not. Hence court cases are often postponed until they can get a willing judge to preside over the case.

  209. To: Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    I have been asked to post the article below on this website, as it closely mirrors my and many other cases.
    £10,000 legal costs place upon me following a 5 minute Court of Protection hearing at Slough County Court by
    District Judge Fortgang, who did not hold a Court of Protection authorization. Present at the hearing was solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor, Government Legal Services. The court tapes are now missing !
    However I now have copies.
    Yours faithfully,
    Leonard Lawrence
    —————————————–

    Len, if you agree, would you post the following on the judges behaving badly website please?

    People might like to be aware of the tricks that gangs of organised criminals – particularly those with law and accounting degrees – employ in order to steal people’s assets. These assets can include children and other close family members, and may involve the participation of corrupt medical and psychiatric professionals who are willing to sign false medical certificates in order to put people under the Court of Protection or the Official Solicitor.

    All over the world, people are being wrongly incarcerated or losing control of their affairs, due to this kind of corruption. In the UK, for example, a Nigerian Family – the Musa Family – had seven children taken from them and they, themselves, were wrongly imprisoned on the basis of lies told by a Haringey social worker. Later, once the children had had their names changed, and they had been permanently adopted, Justice Holman discovered that the social worker had lied. Despite his being prompted to do so, I have not heard that he took any steps to restore the children to their parents, and to pardon or compensate the Musas. On the contrary, they had served time in prison unlawfully, lost their children and all their assets, and been deported to Nigeria without their children or a penny in their pockets. They were then left to write pleading letter after pleading letter to David Cameron and others, only to be ignored. Mrs. Musa was a highly respected Christian minister.

    One basic well-used tactic is for dishonest participants in legal fraud to send out notices to their victims to attend court, either after the hearing has already taken place, or for the notice or summons to arrive without sufficient time to enable the respondent to attend the court hearing. As a consequence of this, the respondent fails to attend the court hearing and the judge, therefore, is free to find in favour of the crooks, the victim therefore loses his court case, and everything looks legitimate because nobody audits the file, and dates have been changed. There is NO legal requirement for a lawyer to prove that he or she sent out any notice to anyone. The legal system has been meticulously set up in such a way as to preclude any equality of arms.

    Documents used in crime and malpractice are not properly executed and sometimes they are even completely forged documents.There are rules that MUST be followed in litigation. These are known as Civil Procedure Rules. The dishonest parties deliberately do not follow them, and everyone who handles the paperwork, including the judiciary, simply turns a blind eye to any ‘irregularities’, surely knowing full well what is going on. These ‘irregularities’ can include, but are not limited to, completely fraudulent documents which are not prescribed for use by law. We have seen documents that have been mocked up with the wrong crown depicted in Her Majesty’s – or the Crown’s – logo. Total fiction.

    To commence a court case, the person bringing the case to court MUST file a a document and pay a filing fee to the court. The file is known as a CASEMAN (Case Management) File. It is assigned a number by the court and this document is used to open the file and commence proceedings. Without this initial document, and without the Caseman file and its assigned serial number, THE CASE DOES NOT EXIST because it should not, by law, proceed. Criminals are bypassing this step and not only stealing assets from the victim, but also stealing from the Treasury because court fees are not being collected.

    Documents involved in these fraudulent cases often do not have the prescribed Caseman file number, embossed court seal, the dates (or the dates are fictitious or documents are backdated). They often lack signatures and date and time stamps. No subsequent judge in the case will sign off the unsigned documents, but he will allow it to stand. Hearings are often held in courts that are not approved for that purpose, and often judges preside over cases that they are not authorized by law to preside over. Hearings are often postponed many times because the opposing party wants to wait until they have a “judicial friend’ sitting on the bench, so that they are sure to win the case.

    Many people are involved in this corrupt chain of events, in which Civil Procedure Rules are NOT followed in order to abuse the law and commit crimes in plain sight in the courts, BUT UNDER THE RADAR. It takes a whole chain of people who handle the paperwork to collude, turn a wilful blind eye, and participate in these joint criminal enterprises – which is what they truly are. They are not mistakes. The practices are widespread and not rarities.

    The last trick they will pull out of the hat, besides gagging orders to silence victims from exposing the crimes, is to declare the litigant a “Vexatious Litigant”, and deny them the right to continue their case in any court in the entire country. If they do persist, they risk being sectioned under mental health laws and locked up.

    Hopefully, people will share this information on Twitter, and other social media sites. I refer you specifically to the following links. Here “legal fraud” and corruption in the justice system is illustrated and explained. Please take the opportunity to educate yourself. It is important that the public be aware of what has happened to the ‘great’ British legal system. It is suggested that you get your legal paperwork forensically examined,

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    THE FORENSICS OF LEGAL FRAUD: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ac2eb2g0l6f1awf/Forensics-of-Legal-Fraud-V1R2-v120110.pdf?dl=0

  210. To: Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    I have been asked to post the article below on this website, as it closely mirrors my and many other cases.

    £10,000 legal costs place upon me following a 5 minute Court of Protection hearing at Slough County Court by District Judge Fortgang, who did not hold a Court of Protection authorization.

    Present at the hearing was solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor, Government Legal Services.

    The court tapes are now missing !

    I now have copies.

    Yours faithfully,
    Leonard Lawrence
    —————————————–

    Len, if you agree, would you post the following on the judges behaving badly website please?

    People might like to be aware of the tricks that gangs of organised criminals – particularly those with law and accounting degrees – employ in order to steal people’s assets. These assets can include children and other close family members, and may involve the participation of corrupt medical and psychiatric professionals who are willing to sign false medical certificates in order to put people under the Court of Protection or the Official Solicitor.

    All over the world, people are being wrongly incarcerated or losing control of their affairs, due to this kind of corruption. In the UK, for example, a Nigerian Family – the Musa Family – had seven children taken from them and they, themselves, were wrongly imprisoned on the basis of lies told by a Haringey social worker. Later, once the children had had their names changed, and they had been permanently adopted, Justice Holman discovered that the social worker had lied. Despite his being prompted to do so, I have not heard that he took any steps to restore the children to their parents, and to pardon or compensate the Musas. On the contrary, they had served time in prison unlawfully, lost their children and all their assets, and been deported to Nigeria without their children or a penny in their pockets. They were then left to write pleading letter after pleading letter to David Cameron and others, only to be ignored. Mrs. Musa was a highly respected Christian minister.

    One basic well-used tactic is for dishonest participants in legal fraud to send out notices to their victims to attend court, either after the hearing has already taken place, or for the notice or summons to arrive without sufficient time to enable the respondent to attend the court hearing. As a consequence of this, the respondent fails to attend the court hearing and the judge, therefore, is free to find in favour of the crooks, the victim therefore loses his court case, and everything looks legitimate because nobody audits the file, and dates have been changed. There is NO legal requirement for a lawyer to prove that he or she sent out any notice to anyone. The legal system has been meticulously set up in such a way as to preclude any equality of arms.

    Documents used in crime and malpractice are not properly executed and sometimes they are even completely forged documents.There are rules that MUST be followed in litigation. These are known as Civil Procedure Rules. The dishonest parties deliberately do not follow them, and everyone who handles the paperwork, including the judiciary, simply turns a blind eye to any ‘irregularities’, surely knowing full well what is going on. These ‘irregularities’ can include, but are not limited to, completely fraudulent documents which are not prescribed for use by law. We have seen documents that have been mocked up with the wrong crown depicted in Her Majesty’s – or the Crown’s – logo. Total fiction.

    To commence a court case, the person bringing the case to court MUST file a a document and pay a filing fee to the court. The file is known as a CASEMAN (Case Management) File. It is assigned a number by the court and this document is used to open the file and commence proceedings. Without this initial document, and without the Caseman file and its assigned serial number, THE CASE DOES NOT EXIST because it should not, by law, proceed. Criminals are bypassing this step and not only stealing assets from the victim, but also stealing from the Treasury because court fees are not being collected.

    Documents involved in these fraudulent cases often do not have the prescribed Caseman file number, embossed court seal, the dates (or the dates are fictitious or documents are backdated). They often lack signatures and date and time stamps. No subsequent judge in the case will sign off the unsigned documents, but he will allow it to stand. Hearings are often held in courts that are not approved for that purpose, and often judges preside over cases that they are not authorized by law to preside over. Hearings are often postponed many times because the opposing party wants to wait until they have a “judicial friend’ sitting on the bench, so that they are sure to win the case.

    Many people are involved in this corrupt chain of events, in which Civil Procedure Rules are NOT followed in order to abuse the law and commit crimes in plain sight in the courts, BUT UNDER THE RADAR. It takes a whole chain of people who handle the paperwork to collude, turn a wilful blind eye, and participate in these joint criminal enterprises – which is what they truly are. They are not mistakes. The practices are widespread and not rarities.

    The last trick they will pull out of the hat, besides gagging orders to silence victims from exposing the crimes, is to declare the litigant a “Vexatious Litigant”, and deny them the right to continue their case in any court in the entire country. If they do persist, they risk being sectioned under mental health laws and locked up.

    Hopefully, people will share this information on Twitter, and other social media sites. I refer you specifically to the following links. Here “legal fraud” and corruption in the justice system is illustrated and explained. Please take the opportunity to educate yourself. It is important that the public be aware of what has happened to the ‘great’ British legal system. It is suggested that you get your legal paperwork forensically examined,

  211. Has this website been set up so as to disallow links to internet sites? Perhaps the website owner can advise please?

  212. Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire
    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road, Sindlesham
    Wokingham, Berkshire RG41 5EA

    Dear Mr Howlett-Bolton,

    Could you please forward to Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)

    Thank you, Leonard Lawrence
    —————————————–

    FTAO Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)

    Regarding: Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Picking on the Little Guy’s and Girl’s

    Independent Office of Police Conduct, United Kingdom Reference: 2838/2015
    There is also the matter of defamatory statements having been entered into the police computer,
    (Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police) which may have been instrumental in blocking
    Mr Lawrence from receiving the investigation to which he is entitled.

    Pro Grand Master, comments from some genuine and truthful Freemasons that know me:-

    Dear Len,
    Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself by ruining the lives
    of others against all Masonic and ethical principles. Indeed if you read the Charge after initiation, every
    Mason has a personal responsibility to behave in a manner which is ‘useful to mankind and become an
    ornament to the society’

    Leonard,
    Dear God Len……I never realized there was so much corruption or so many deplorable people in the legal
    profession. these Judges are evil……pure evil. It has put a very different spin on Freemasonry for me.
    It saddens me greatly that decent men like you are suffering needlessly because of the sickening
    behaviour of these ruthless bastards.

    Dear Len,
    Wishing you all the best in your fight to rectify a set of circumstances which should not have happened .
    I am glad you have told your story from start to finish an amazing set of experiences to live through .
    You are a survivor who lived to tell the tale

    Hi Len,
    Brilliant! It is strongly believed that this is a MAJOR public interest case ….

    Good morning Len,
    You clearly have much watertight evidence and a strong support network. Knowing how slowly the
    Wheels of Justice turn, when do you propose ‘going live’ with your case? I strongly believe, when you
    do go live even more people and irrefutable evidence will surface.

    Len ,
    It is good to hear that slowly but surely your story is becoming heard. My dealings with the courts and like
    left me shocked, stunned and traumatized. It helps to know that there’s hope for a better outcome, for others,
    due to those who have found the strength to challenge.

    Len,
    I read all of your attachments with great interest and with my uncompromising support for you my friend

    Lennie,
    I hope your situation will soon be in the public domain and that those who need to be answerable are
    confronted and challenged in the very near future. I can see this as an interesting Channel 4 series ……..

    Hi Len,
    It’s good to see the progress your making. I’m thinking you need to get these fraudsters into a criminal
    court. Yours is one example of many cover ups and maybe in getting your case more public others will
    come forward too. Join the Dots may be useful using other peoples cases. Wishing you well.

    Leonard,
    Ho ho ho …. merry Christmas. Unwrap that, you bastards ! Excellent. Bring it on.
    Right from the outset of meeting you, without knowing any detail, I came right out with it and told you this was a conspiracy of events to stop you exposing the aerotoxic disaster for fear that it could do significant damage to the multi billion turnover aircraft industry. I still stand by that. The characters involved in your mistreatment have largely been peons/unwitting passengers on the journey set in motion by machiavellian characters at the very top
    of the food chain, who by very nature of their position consider themselves untouchable. Always had faith you
    would kick back & in good time, may you badly singe tailfeathers ….. !

    Dear Len,
    In common with so many of us Len, you have discovered what an intricate evil web bonds them all together, and
    how so much can be lost and hidden in the creation of a long and complex paper chase which takes simple issues
    and turns them into long and complicated intricacies.

    Dear Len,
    The battle continues!
    One of the problems in this country is that Judges are completely ring-fenced, and it is almost impossible to get
    them removed. It usually needs action by the Lord Chancellor or even an act of parliament. No other group of
    people are so completely safeguarded and protected .

    To Leonard,
    Do not forget you are in a position with officials willing to genuinely investigate Oliver,
    DET ‘SEMPER OCCULTUS’ NI

    “Semper Vigilant”
    2 February 2006 at 16:44 Helen Clift, instructed Stephen Piper, office of the Official Solicitor, to obtain a
    consent order from the Court of Protection. This was a RED HERRING. On the 4 August 2005 Helen Clift
    had already made all financial decisions in your case without the knowledge of the Court of Protection
    and without Court of Protection authorization.

  213. Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons
    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Deputy Chief Constable Rtd.
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road
    Sindlesham, Wokingham
    Berkshire RG41 5EA

    Dear Mr Howlett-Bolton,

    As a former Deputy Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police Force and a former Chief Superintendent of Thames
    Valley Police I am puzzled why three Freemasons have/are causing me considerable suffering, two I understand
    are members of Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684. As a former senior Police officer you may find the paragraph
    below unpleasant. The officers that visited me, one of whom was senior to yourself the other of an equivalent
    rank were also Freemasons. The person responsible for the defamatory statements has been traced to a Detective Superintendent at Thames Valley Police. The supporting evidence has also been handed to me.

    Independent Office of Police Conduct, United Kingdom Reference: 2838
    There is also the matter of defamatory statements having been entered into the police computer, which may have
    been instrumental in blocking Mr Lawrence from receiving the investigation to which he is entitled, and it is to be hoped that these statements will be removed completely.

    Provincial Grand Master, Howlett-Bolton
    I am of the belief that the Treasury Solicitors have been given a defamatory information about me by a member
    of Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684. I suspect it accuses me of mental illness.

    Provincial Grand Master, Howlett-Bolton, Dr Graham C. Holt publication addresses my clinical picture.
    Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220):
    “At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence…. His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle those culpable.”

    Provincial Grand Master, Howlett-Bolton

    AN ACCOUNT OF WHAT OCCURRED TO ME AT READING AND SLOUGH COUNTY COURT IS BELOW:

    NICHOLAS ALLEN 29 Bedford Row London WC1 4HE Counsel for the Official Solicitor Skeleton Argument 6) (a) it is not believed that Mr. Edmond has been authorized by the Court of Protection under Part V11 of the Mental Health Act 1983(FPR9.2(7)(b) para.15

    Official Solicitor Laurence Oates, Master of the Court of Protection and the Senior District Judge at the Principal Registry of the Family Division of the High Court. Only the persons listed in s94 Mental Health Act 1983 may give any approval or make any order required for the management of property and affairs of a patient under Part VII of that Act. These persons are the nominated judges of the Court of Protection (High Court judiciary of the Chancery and Family divisions), the Master of the Court of Protection and his nominated Officers

    ——————————————
    26 July 2010. Law Society Solicitors FINAL REPORT CRO/97504-2008 dated 20 July 2010 Summary

    1. The legal representatives in this matter including BP Collins had a duty as officers of the Court under rule 11.01 of
    the Solicitors Code of Conduct not to “knowingly mislead” and “not (to)… draft any documents relating to any proceedings containing :
    (a) any contention which you do not consider to be property arguable..”
    The customers mental capacity was a live issue and in the light of the CP3 Court of Protection medical certificates under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 the contention that the customer was capable of agreeing a sale price of the FMH or consenting to a sale price of the FMH was not property arguable.

    These issues should be referred to the Court and SRA.

    2. There is evidence to show that RDG was aware of the existence of three CP3 certificates at the relevant time but contend that it was the duty of the Official Solicitor to make any relevant application to the Court of Protection.

    3. There is evidence to show that BP Collins was aware of the existence of three CP3 certificates at the relevant time.

    5. There is further evidence including a letter dated 22 February 2005 that BP Collins was aware that medical evidence relating to the customers state of mind had not been filed at Court. BP Collins held a medical report dated 23November 2004 confirming that the customer lacked the mental capacity to manage and administer his property and affairs.

    6. The Court ordered that BP Collins the wife solicitors provide an explanation of the accounts. RDG raised the issue of how the customer’s wife’s solicitors came to be in possession of his financial accounts firstly by letter dated 10 March 2005 to BP Collins and secondly by Counsel for the customer at final hearing. The Court had the power to enforce its order that the wife’s solicitors provide an explanation for their possessions of the accounts by a penal notice

    (In 2008/9 Her Honour Judge Campbell, His Honour Judge Elly and DJ McCulloch finally established that BP Collins Solicitors obtained Mr Lawrence documents and accounts from Nicola Lawrence, whom had previously sworn an affidavit that Mr Lawrence did not work at all)

    7. The issue of the duty of all solicitors involved in Ancillary Relief matters to the Court as officers of the Court and, as part of its duty to the court; and the more specific duty of BP Collins as the Applicant’s solicitors to inform the Court of all relevant matters via the trial bundle, are issues central to the customer’s complaints and should be referred to the more appropriate forums of the Court and SRA

    8. Ratcliff Duce & Gammer notified BP Collins on 4 March 2005 of the need to refer to the Court of Protection when a party lacked mental capacity and that matters could not be concluded without the involvement of the Court of Protection.

    9. If BP Collins did not have in its possession during the proceedings copies of the three CP3 certificates and medical evidence and information regarding the customer’s lack of capacity: it had knowledge of their existence. BP Collins was in any event entitled to request the same and as the Applicants Solicitor in Ancillary Relief proceedings had a duty to include these in the trail bundle in accordance with the President’s Direction of 10 March 2000 ‘Family Proceedings: Court Bundles’ as “documents relevant to the hearing” and in accordance with 2.2 to include reference to the customers lack of capacity in the summary as a matter “the court needs to know for the purposes of the hearing and for management of the case”

    10. Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable adult.
    ——————————————————
    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court HHJ Oliver:
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    Barrister: It does
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”
    Barrister: Yes
    ——————————————————
    Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42 +0100 Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence
    Dear Mr. Lawrence, HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.
    Kind regards
    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    —————————————————–
    From: Civil Appeals – Registry [mailto:civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
    Sent: 14 August 2014 08:57
    To: ‘len lawrence’
    Subject: RE: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    Dear Sirs, Your request is not possible to achieve as the file has not been forwarded to our offices as of yet.
    ——————————————————

    10 DECEMBER 2019 AND THE COURT OF APPEAL HAS STILL NOT RECEIVED THE RE-TRANSFERRING ORDER
    AND FILES FROM READING COUNTY COURT AND WORSHIPFUL MASTER HHJ SIMON OLIVER. ALMOST 7 YEARS.

    Yours sincerely

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

  214. Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    WHY COVER IT UP IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE ?

    To Leonard,
    Do not forget you are in a position with officials willing to genuinely investigate Oliver.

    HM Procurator please see below:

    Email NAllen@29bedfordrow.co.uk 05 August 2005 10.30
    From Barrister Nicholas Allen to Barrister Dominic Brazil

    Subject: Lawrence

    Dear Dominic

    As requested.

    I have simply “accepted all” the tracked changes.

    I haven’t fully checked what effect this has had on the draft order, but hope that it is sufficient for
    your purposes

    Best Wishes,
    Nick
    ————————————————————————————
    25 August 2010 letter Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers to Mr Lawrence:
    I am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to District Judge Fortgang that
    the Official Solicitor (Laurence Oates) agreed that the house be sold for 622,000.”

    Barrister Nicholas Allen QC was a member of the Complaints Committee of the Bar Standards Board
    (2005-2007) The same Bar Standards Board Committee that investigated Mr Allen and Mr Brazil.

    ———————————————————————————
    Email: 1 August 2005

    James Beck solicitor office of the Official Solicitors to Helen Mary Clift, office of the Official Solicitor

    RE: Leonard LAWRENCE LNF41919

    Obviously, the sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority.

    ————————————————————————————-
    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court HHJ Oliver:
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    Barrister: It does
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”
    Barrister: Yes

  215. Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service
    FTAO Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)

    SLOUGH AND READING COUNTY COURT: WHY COVER IT UP IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE ?

    Following a conference in the office of Nicholas Francis QC, now Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC
    the Fax below was sent to B. P. Collins Solicitors on behalf of Government Legal Services.

    Fax: 31-MAR-2005 16:15 From Government Legal Service, FAX to 01753 889851 to BP Collins Solicitors
    Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd, Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL

    “Mr Lawrence is even more vulnerable then when he last saw him. He will not be able to rationally argue
    his case”.

    ———————————————————————
    Petition update · Leonard Lawrence Change.org 126,657 have signed.

    https://www.change.org › stop-contaminated-cabin-air-in-aircraft

    28 Apr 2019 – This is long overdue, but it is time people were made aware of the dreadful treatment endured by Leonard Lawrence – former BAE Pilot …

    28 APR 2019 —
    We have held off from publishing this story for some time because not only it is extremely disturbing and outrageous, it is quite unbelievable.

    This is long overdue, but it is time people were made aware of the dreadful treatment endured by Leonard Lawrence – former BAe Pilot – Poisoned by Toxic Fumes onboard the aircraft he worked on.

    As the CCHR article mentions, Len is fortunately still here and is still fighting for justice – not only for himself but for everyone who has been affected or injured by contaminated air in aircraft.

    The case of Len Lawrence
    From – Citizens Commission On Human Rights UK
    (Adapted from June 2015 article by CCHR UK)

    Len Lawrence was a fully fit and experienced pilot who had been working for British Aerospace since 1989 when he experienced and recorded his first ‘fume event’ – the presence in a plane’s onboard air system of toxins. In the most serious cases, these toxins are organophosphates identical to those responsible for deaths and brain damage among agricultural workers.

    On the 29th of November 1991, just as his aircraft reached take-off speed, the flight deck filled with hot acrid fumes that were so dense it was impossible to see the instruments and controls and impossible to breathe.

    Both Len and his captain were blinded by the fumes as, their eyes and skin burning, their aircraft began to accelerate over 160 mph. Only willpower and long experience enabled the captain to feel his way among the array of instruments for the ‘dump valve’ control, which would evacuate the tainted air from the system.

    The incident was over in about fifteen seconds, and both pilots soon regained their eyesight, enabling them to commence emergency mayday procedures with Air Traffic Control and safely achieve a forced landing.

    This was by no means an isolated experience, as evidenced by the fact that British Aerospace and others later entered into a secret settlement agreement with victims of aircraft fumes. In the course of an Australian senate inquiry in 1999, a spokesman for British Aerospace admitted: ‘There is absolutely no doubt in our minds that there is a general health issue here. The number of people who have symptoms indicates that there is a general issue. With the weight of human evidence and suffering, which is quite clear, there must be something there.’

    Len himself experienced a series of these events, the last in 2004, when he was co-pilot to a recently-retired Civil Aviation Authority flight operation inspector.

    Len recalls that he and the pilot were aware of an oily smell. What followed was and remains a blank. The plane had descended to five hundred feet above Amsterdam – take off or landing altitude – before they were able to pull it out and return to the correct flight path.

    Both men were still suffering from mental confusion, and this time it didn’t go away.

    The next day they were flying together again when they received an instruction to reroute their Italy-bound flight to Switzerland. ‘Both the captain and I were unable to process the information being given,’ says Len. ‘That was my last ever flight before I resigned. I could not, and indeed still cannot, think clearly enough to fly.’

    Having helped to avert a number of potential disasters caused by the ongoing mechanical fault and the airlines’ failure to fit air quality sensors to their aircraft, and selflessly retired when he felt he was no longer up to the job, it might be thought that his employers owed him some respect and appropriate treatment for the damage he had sustained in their employ.

    Instead, Len was sent to a psychiatrist, who ignored both the symptoms and the chain of causation, declaring Len to be ‘mentally ill’ and in need of pharmaceutical drugs.

    There was no mystery about the real causes of Len’s problems. As the Australian senate enquiry had been told five years previously, ‘The source of the odours has been identified as primarily Mobil Jet Oil II leaking past oil seals in the engines and or APU unit (Auxiliary Power Unit) into the air conditioning system.’

    In the case of organophosphate poisoning, the psychiatrist’s action was not merely one of standard incompetence and drug pushing. It is recognised that pharmaceutical drugs are inclined to react with the existing toxins to cause cell damage and develop even more poisonous compounds, so are the last thing that should be prescribed.

    As a ‘mental case’, Len was placed under the Official Solicitor to the High Court and held there for more than a year, during which time, to add insult to injury, his assets and savings to the tune of £5oo,000 were disposed of illegally by barristers and solicitors .

    He lost his home and his marriage before the British Airline Pilots’ Association came to his rescue, by-passing the official solicitor and referring him to the Civil Aviation Authority’s psychiatric advisor, Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP, FRCPsych, who immediately took Len off the drugs and arranged for him to receive long overdue specialist toxicology treatment for organophosphate poisoning.

    Len Lawrence is clearly a survivor. He has lived through industrial poisonings, multiple losses, corporate and official obstruction and efforts by psychiatrists to suppress and silence him. Not only is he still with us, but he continues to fight for the exposure of cover ups and crooked deals that affect us all.

  216. Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service
    Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police
    Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames Valley Police

    19 AUGUST 2019 THAMES VALLEY POLICE DISCLOSURE:

    Internal review by Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 Reading CID.

    Re: Leonard Lawrence

    Summary of Issues February 2016

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hypermanic. BP Collins (solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is therefore
    under the care of the Court of Protection.

    ———————————————————————-
    (BP Collins above is: BP Collins Solicitors, Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd, Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL)

    The name of the solicitor at BP Collins solicitors that obtained the Part V11 Sectioning Order/Report
    is Graeme S. Fraser.

    Graeme S. Fraser is now a Partner with OGR Stock Denton LLP 2nd Floor, Winston House, 2 Dollis Park,
    Finchley, London N3 1HF.

    On the 23 November 2004 solicitor Graeme S. Fraser obtained the Part V11 Sectioning order from Dr Royds,
    Cygnet Healthcare, Godden Green.

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser then forwarded the Part V11 Sectioning Order to barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings
    Bench Walk Chambers.

    In 2010 Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, had obtained an admission
    from Dominic Brazil that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection, prior to the hearing before
    H.H. J. Simon Oliver at Reading County Court on the 16 April 2012.

    Why was the above not disclosed to the Civil Court of Appeal ??????????????????????????

  217. Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    Australian Senate Inquiry: Hansard 2/11/99 “The source of the odors has been identified as primarily
    Mobil Jet Oil II leaking past oil seals in the engines and or APU unit into the air conditioning system”

    Hospital Medical Director Report reference: Leonard Lawrence Pilot:

    1. He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity.

    2. During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection.
    (by solicitor Helen Clift from within the Official Solicitors office)

    3. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of
    Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing.

    4. Test by Professor Abou-Donia in January 2006. Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of
    Neurobiology (Paid for by British Airline Pilots Association) Tau and MBP suggest the presence of
    moderate brain injury. Consistent with chemical –induced nervous system injury.

    5. Associated Neurological Defects:
    a) Cerebral Cortex Weakness
    b) Limbic System. Learning, memory defect

  218. Jonathan Jones HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Service

    SLOUGH AND READING COUNTY COURT: WHY COVER IT UP IF THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE ?

    29 June 2005 Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors to BP Collins Solicitors Ref SSB/SJA/L00529/2
    Only once we hear from Dr Tony can the Official Solicitor apply to the Court of Protection as discussed
    for authority to sign the release of Mr. Lawrence rights of occupation.

    Turbervilles Solicitors Uxbridge Middlesex. Senior Partner. sess.sigre@turbervilles.co.uk
    Turbervilles Solicitors proceed with the sale of 38 Dukes Wood Avenue, SL9 7JT without the knowledge
    or authority from the Court of Protection.

  219. Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton, Deputy Chief Constable Rtd.
    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Barrister Mr Dorian Day written opinion to the Legal Service, Special Cases Unit.

    Dated 13 October 2011
    FINAL ORDER OF DISTRICT JUDGE FORTGANG IS VOID, IT HAS NOT BEEN TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION.
    The Court of Protection Point.
    1. In many respects as discussed in conference this point is simple
    2. Whilst prima facie H has the protection of Official Solicitor he was not registered as a protected party should
    be in the Court of Protection and/or no receiver was appointed.
    3. He was therefore left financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order for sale.
    4. This is a serious procedural error and comes within the criteria for an appeal and has led to injustice.
    5. This is a case where acute injustice appears to have occurred.
    6. There is in my view a number of important points of principal involved for future proceedings and irrespective
    of merits and economic terms which I contend do exist as above-Mr Lawrence should be entitled to be funded
    publicly so that the points of principal can be clarified by the High Court by way of appeal.

    It is not understood why the appeal was listed before HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading County Court on the 16 April
    2012 when, HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    According to Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors on the 17 August 2012 HHJ Simon Oliver telephoned St Philips
    Chambers, Birmingham and spoke to my barrister Mr Dorian Day. Thereafter, Mr Dorian Day withdrew from
    my case, even when as it is now known, Mrs Justice Pauffley had instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer
    my case to the Civil Court of Appeal and a second judge Philip Waller (authorised Court of Protection judge)
    had instructed that the my files be sent to the first instance to the Court of Protection and an appeal filed

    HHJ Simon Oliver failed to comply with both of those instruction. Simpson Millar LLP then requested that
    I sign an agreement to pay barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers £10,000 and a substantial
    amount of monies to B P Collins Solicitors.

    What is now known is that tens of thousands of case’s including: Rape, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence,
    Vulnerable adult and children cases have not being recorded by Thames Valley Police !!

    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Mr Lowndes you may wish to enquire with the former Grand Secretary David Keys, Berkshire Freemasons
    what occurred to me after May 2016 ! This is in-addition to what occurred to me after February 2013

    Almost seven years later and the Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    has still not made the re-transferring order to the Court of Appeal that he was instructed to make by Mrs Justice
    Pauffley in February 2013.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  220. I still experience traumatised from the family court system and still suffering the consequences

  221. To: Family Justice Council

    Chukwuma Uju / Judicial Appointments (Pre-Appointments) Advisor & Swearing-in Officer /
    Judicial Office for England & Wales. 10th Floor Thomas More Building /Royal Courts of Justice /
    Strand / WC2A 2LL

    Dear Mr Lawrence,

    His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015
    Regards
    Chukwuma

    —————————————————————————————–
    To: Family Justice Council,

    Why did HMCTS Reading list my court hearing on the 16 April 2012, with five live Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificates, Neurological Incapacity, (Organophosphate Poisoning) before HHJ Simon Oliver ?

    HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation until the 2 October 2015. Some three
    years later.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  222. To: Family Justice Council,

    Following a conference in the former office of Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC the fax below was sent:

    Fax sent at 16: 31-MAR-2005 on behalf of Government Legal Services
    To: BP Collins Solicitors Collins House, 32-38 Station Rd, Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL

    “Mr Lawrence is even more vulnerable. He will not be able to argue his case”.

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser and BP Collins Solicitors omitted the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates,
    from the Final Hearing bundle !!

    Why has HHJ Simon Oliver allowed barrister Dominic Brazil, solicitor Graeme S. Fraser and BP Collins
    Solicitors to place upon me many Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in adverse costs and inferences
    when I was a protected party with an aquired brain injury ?

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Freemasons:
    Only four Freemasons, including Dr David Staples, have taken such an adverse interest in my welfare !
    Other Freemasons, including Police Officers have been very helpful and kind.

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.

    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

  223. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC

    1 Garden Court Chambers, the former Chambers of Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    Report on Leonard Lawrence for solicitor Helen May Clift, office of the Official Solicitor.

    Leonard Lawrence:
    “Incapable of legal discussion and understanding with the Official Solicitor or any solicitor
    instructed by him (Official Solicitor) from November 2004 and at the time of this report
    14 September 2005”

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.

    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

  224. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC

    Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    Barrister Dorian Day: It does
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.
    Barrister Dorian Day: Yes,

    1st November 2013
    Sarah Christou Senior Operations Manager, Court of Protection
    There has never been an application the Court of Protection

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.

  225. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC

    27 July 2005 Solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors, Reading, Berkshire
    “Mr. Lawrence is not capable of discussing the legal proceedings and counsel and I are
    concerned about the implications of that upon any attendance we have with Mr. Lawrence”

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield Notes of Final Hearing, Slough County Court, 5 April 2005:
    Barrister Mr. Allen “we can’t take rational evidence from Mr. Lawrence re matters since
    1st March when I.S. (instructing solicitors) came on board”

  226. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC
    cc Lord Justice Andrew McFarland QC President of the Family and Court of Protection.

    9 September 2010 Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk.

    Whilst it was barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, that placed Hundreds of
    Thousands of Pounds of in adverse costs and inferences upon me, when according to the former
    Chambers of Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC and Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC I was “Incapable
    of legal discussion and understanding” it was the former chambers of Lord Justice Andrew
    McFarland QC, President of the Family and Court of Protection, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers that
    extracted an admission from barrister Dominic Brazil that I had been a patient subject to the Court
    of Protection.

    In September 2010 Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk question barrister
    Dominic Brazil about myself Leonard Lawrence.

    On the 9 September 2009 Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk wrote to
    advise me that barrister Dominic Brazil had informed him that I Leonard was a patient subject
    to the Court of Protection when he had placed Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in adverse
    costs and inferences upon me, whilst I was a patent subject to the Court of Protection.

    Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, further advises me that
    barrister Dominic Brazil informed Richard Anelay QC that solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of
    the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts, (Goverment Legal Services) was present at court when
    these costs and inferences were placed upon me.

    Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, letter was available to
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver prior to the hearing on the 16 April 2012.

    Barrister Dominic Brazil is now at: Stephens Road Chambers, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE
    WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA. Strangely Stephens Road Chambers has no phone number or email address.

    Leonard Lawrence

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.

  227. “Barrister Dominic Brazil is now at: Stephens Road Chambers, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE
    WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA. Strangely Stephens Road Chambers has no phone number or email address.”

    Very interesting. Perhaps he doesn’t need a phone or email. Perhaps there’s not much work about these days.

  228. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC
    cc Lord Justice Andrew McFarland QC President of the Family and Court of Protection.

    22 February 2005
    Caseworker Stephen Piper, Office of the Official Solicitor, Ref LNF41919 writes:
    Dr Tony does think that it would be a good idea if the Court of Protection were involved,
    I said (Stephen Piper to Dr Tony) that if Mr. Lawrence recovered then the Court of Protection could
    come out.

    Dr Royds issued a Part V11 MHA 1983 Certificate to Graeme S. Fraser, BP Collins solicitors 23/11/04.
    Dr Royds issued a Court of Protection Medical Certificate CP3 on 27/1/05
    Dr Tony issues a Court of Protection Medical Certificate CP3 on 24/2/05
    Both Consultant Psychiatrists identify that Mr. Lawrence affairs were for the Court of Protection,
    Mr. Lawrence must be protected.

    HEARING 16 APRIL 2012 BEFORE HHJ SIMON OLIVER, READING COUNTY COURT.
    On the 16 April 2012 Reading County Court solicitor Paul Hicks Simpson Millar LLP alleges in the
    waiting room that May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor, had admitted liability for Leonard
    Lawrence non registration with the Court of Protection in a telephone call on or about 20 March
    2012 when disclosing Leonard Lawrence’s case files

    The email below was found within the Official Solicitors case file on Leonard Lawrence when the
    files were inspected at Simpson Millar LLP Bristol office on the 23 March 2012 …..

    Original Message
    From: Piper, Steve Sent: 02 February 2006 16:44
    To: Clift, Helen (OSPT)
    Subject: Mr Lawrence
    Importance:

    High Mr Lawrence was put through to me by Gen Office. He said he has a completed of CP2, and wants
    to know what happens next. He told me that the OS had sent out the form and I said that the OS would
    send the form to the CoP who would make the appropriate order. He wanted to know how long this
    would take, and I said I did not know, but at least a couple of weeks. Mr Lawrence will bring the CP2 here
    (I don’t know when) and wants a receipt when he hands it over. I said that wouldn’t be a problem.
    Stephen Piper
    Office of the Official Solicitor and Public Trustee 81 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1DD
    11 0207 911 7126 steve.piper@offsol.gsi.gov.uk

    Clift, Helen (OSPT) From: Clift, Helen (OSPT)
    Sent: 02 February 2006 16:44
    To: Piper, Steve (OSPT)
    Subject: RE: Mr. Lawrence
    Ok essentially it should allow the solicitors to release to him the funds they are holding
    Helen

    Social Worker Richard Lasson. Buckinghamshire Mental Health Trust.
    On or about 6 October 2005 Richard Lasson, Buckinghamshire Mental Health Trust, established that
    Stephen Piper (caseworker office of the Official Solicitor) had not registered Leonard Lawrence with
    the Court of Protection, but failed to take any action.

    1st November 2013
    Sarah Christou Senior Operations Manager, Court of Protection
    There has never been an application the Court of Protection

    LEONARD LAWRENCE

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.

  229. To: Family Justice Council,
    cc Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC
    cc Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC
    cc Lord Justice Andrew McFarland QC President of the Family and Court of Protection.

    “Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!” (Sir Walter Scott, 1808).

    9 September 2010 Mr. Richard Anelay QC, Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk wrote that barrister
    Dominic Brazil had identified that Leonard Lawrence was a patient subject to the Court of Protection

    BARRISTER DOMINIC BRAZIL WAS INSTRUCTED BY GRAEME S. FRASER AND BP COLLINS SOLICITORS

    21 April 2015: Sehar Kahan,
    BP Collins Solicitors, Risk & Compliance Officer
    BP Collins Solicitors, Collins House 32-38 Station Road, Gerrard Cross, Bucks SL9 8EL
    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    Re: Subject Access Request
    Further to your recent correspondence, we are writing to confirm that we are unable to process your
    Subject Access Request since the Firm‘s records show that we do not hold any personal information
    about you. Please find enclosed the £10 cheque payment you had previously sent us.
    Yours Sincerely
    SEHAR KHAH Risk & Compliance Officer

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser
    24 November 2004 Our Ref: GSF.GDF LAWR043.0001
    24/11/04 13:23 Fax From Solicitor Graeme Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors, to Dr Royds, Godden Green Clinic.
    Thank you for supplying the confidential psychiatric report yesterday.

    Now solicitor Graeme S. Fraser and BP Collins Solicitors are denying having the medical certificate:

    22 February 2004 Graeme Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks
    URGENT PASS TO DISTRICT JUDGE JONES ON RECEIPT
    “The Learned District Judge will recall making a Direction earlier in the proceedings that medical evidence
    be filed as to Mr. Lawrence‘s capacity. We are extremely concerned as to the delay regarding the medical
    evidence”.

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    24 January 2015
    Prof. Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych Consultant Psychiatrist
    Professor Turnbull locates Dr. Royds, Godden Green Clinic, clinical notes on Leonard Lawrence.
    Professor Turnbull forwards these notes to Leonard Lawrence on the 24 January 2015.
    Dr Royds notes included a letter from solicitor Graeme Fraser, BP Collins Solicitors, thanking
    Dr Royds for supplying the confidential psychiatric report dated 23 November 2004 on Leonard
    Lawrence. On the 22 February 2004 solicitor Graeme Fraser wrote to District Judge Jones alleging
    that Leonard Lawrence had not filed a psychiatric report.

    Leonard Lawrence

    Copied to:
    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE
    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton.