——- OPERATION ‘X’——-

HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER 

INTRODUCING A CRIMINAL IN A ROBE

We are back! Unfortunately, cowards and paedophile protectors took our previous website down to protect the criminals that are operating in our judicial offices. Judge Simon Oliver attempted to silence all of the victims by falsifying court orders and court documents as well as bullying and harassing web hosters. It has not worked and we are now back. Louisa Lloyd-Jones from the Government Legal Department and Ben Silverstone from Matrix chambers have been lying and forging documents to take down websites that correctly reports the truth. This form of bullying and harassment might work with web hosters but it will not work with us. We will take our site (and public comments which speaks the truth) and take it to a country with even greater privacy protection. The correct procedure is when thousands of allegations have been made of misconduct against judge Simon Oliver, that Simon Oliver is suspended from duties, then all of his judgements are revisited. Statements should also be taken from litigants addressing concerns and in return Mr Oliver is prosecuted by the Ministry of Justice, the Government Legal Department and the Crown Prosecution Service. However, the reverse seems to be what the Ministry of Justice are doing here and that is to protect the bigger fish. It will not work. We are here for you the public and we will fight for you until the end. In the meantime, please feel free to comment on our new site and distribute it throughout your social media channels.

Welcome to this site which is part of Operation ‘X’. If you have reached here, it must be because a Judge or a lawyer has been up to no good. Well, look no further because we are here to help. Operation ‘X’ is here to help the public against bribery and corruption in the British Judicial system. This site represents the truth against publicly funded criminals and exposes the criminals that operate in our judicial offices.

His Honour Judge Simon Oliver works at the Upper Tribunal in London, Isleworth Crown Court and the family court in Reading and Slough County Courts.

This website deals with HHJ Simon Oliver asking for, accepting and taking bribes to pervert the course of justice. He is racist, extremely corrupt, perverts the course of justice and commits perjury in return for illegal and criminal bribes in the UK court system.

A judge for sale: These are pictures of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver. He is the one who takes bribes using the term ‘gift’. He is the criminal in the court system and eyewitness testimony exists to confirm this and the substantial amounts of comments on this site confirms it further.
The proud Berkshire Freemason in all his glory: Judge Simon Oliver in his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. This is an association he is not supposed to have. His association with the Berkshire Freemasons has clear ramifications on his decision making skills which is evident from this website and other media postings about him online.

On June 24th, 2014, our team were sat in the Upper Tribunal located in the Breams Buildings in London for a case involving an unrepresented member of the public against a government department called the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). The DBS has functions to bar people from working with children and vulnerable adults. 

At the oral hearing which lasted 4 days, HHJ Simon Oliver asked for a ‘gift’ from the parties concerned. The DBS gave him a gift in the form of a box which was wrapped up in a Sainsbury’s Carrier bag. Since then, HHJ Simon Oliver made a mockery out of the court system and the judgement he gave.

IF YOU HAVE THIS JUDGE IN YOUR CASE, PLEASE NOTE, HE TAKES BRIBES IN THE FORM OF ‘GIFT BOXES’.

IF THE JUDGEMENT YOU RECEIVED IS FILLED WITH LIES, ITS BECAUSE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAS RECEIVED A GIFT THROUGH OTHER MEANS.

IF HE GIVES YOU A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT AND PENALTY, APPEAL IT AS ITS MOST LIKELY HE HAS RECEIVED ‘GIFTS’.

The ‘Gift’ System

ON NOTE, PLEASE BE MINDED, A GIFT IS AN ALTERNATIVE WORD FOR A BRIBE AND INVOLVES MONEY, HOLIDAYS, CRUISES AND JUST ABOUT ANYTHING OF VALUE. HOWEVER, MONEY IS THE MOST COMMON ALONG WITH A NOTE INSIDE THE BOX ABOUT WHAT JUDGEMENT THEY REQUIRE. THE SYSTEM WORKS WHEN ONE LAWYER GIVES THE JUDGE A BOX OR PLACES A BOX SOMEWHERE IN THE COURTROOM WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING. THE COURT CLERK IS USUALLY ALSO INVOLVED. THE BOX IS USUALLY FROM THEIR CLIENT AND CONTAINS SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF MONEY (MINIMUM £8,000). IT IS ALSO COMMON FOR THE DEFENCE LEGAL TEAM TO GET BRIBED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE LEGAL AID FUNDED. ALTERNATIVE WORDS FOR BRIBES ARE ‘LOANS’. WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING, THE BOX GOES MISSING AND A FAVOURABLE JUDGEMENT IS GIVEN BY THE JUDGE TO THE PARTY WHO GAVE THE GIFT OR LOAN TO THEM. THIS IS KNOWN AS ‘THE GIFT SYSTEM’.

This is what took place throughout the 4 day hearing.

Incident in question

On day 1 of the oral hearing:

  • Within 5-10 minutes of the oral hearing initiating, HHJ Simon Oliver puts his hand over the microphone and says ‘Do you have anything for me?’. His head was down at this moment and we believe he was talking to the other side but no one specifically. The DBS barrister ‘BJ’ from Blackstone chambers in London, also putting his hand over the microphone (Only after HHJ Simon Oliver directed he do so with hand gestures) says ‘My client has a gift for you from The Trust’ (from The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust CEO Robert Bell and the Director of HR Carol Johnson). Kevin Brooks from the Treasury Solicitors (TSOL), now called the Government legal department, approaches the judicial bench with a box (the size of a book) in an orange Sainsbury’s carrier bag. HHJ Simon Oliver immediately puts his other hand up whilst his initial hand was still on the microphone and stops Kevin Brooks in his tracks. HHJ Simon Oliver directs his right hand to his left to which Kevin Brooks puts his head down and follows to the end of the judicial bench. Mr Brooks tucks the box in neatly under or behind the bench or a table at the end of the bench away from sight although we could still see a piece of the carrier bag appearing from the area it was placed in. At this moment, a gasp appears in the courtroom about the incident and apparently the way Mr Brooks approached the judicial bench. Michael Flynn (Norwich magistrates court judge), a specialist panel member whom also had his hand on his microphone during this period continued writing something whilst he clearly noticed the event. Janice Funnell (child psychologist from Merton council), another specialist member laughed at the incident. Simon Oliver had an embarrassed smirk on his face as in ‘Have i been caught?’. After this, BJ and HHJ Simon Oliver took their hands off the microphone. We are not sure if Michael Flynn or Janice Funnell had their hands on the microphone at this time as we were not observing them or their hands at this time.
  • The first day of the hearing was not bad. The judiciary seemed straight forward and impartial. Michael Flynn began doing some minor hand gestures towards the end of the day which we did not consider a major problem at the time. He did the hand gestures around 4-5 times (in guise that’s he’s not interested).
  • An adjournment took place around lunchtime at HHJ Simon Oliver’s request. At this time, the DBS barrister BJ asked the appellant that they can leave the courtroom and have a break and to come back in 15 minutes. During this break, the DBS senior management and officials were sat in the back of the courtroom started preparing boxes quickly. Whilst the appellant was outside the courtroom, the DBS senior management (at the request of the DBS CEO Adele Downey), placed a box under the judicial bench. It is unknown what contained in the box but it is very highly likely that it was money in the form of a bribe. When the entire courtroom came back, the DBS senior management and BJ directed to HHJ Simon Oliver that there was ‘something’ under the table for him. HHJ Simon Oliver nodded in acceptance but did not approach the area of the judicial bench where the DBS senior management were pointing towards. 
  • Towards the end of the hearing on the first day when the judiciary were retiring, HHJ Simon Oliver, Janice Funnell and Michael Flynn stood up to leave and were partly gone through the back door. Janice Funnell was the first one to leave through the back door and HHJ Simon Oliver was partly through the back door and Michael Flynn was in the process of going through the back door. That is when Kevin Brooks of the TSOL and unknown members in the back of the court room uttered some words (unknown to what it was) and pointed out to the box under the judicial bench/table. To this, HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Oh yeah’ and directed Michael Flynn pick up the box as Michael Flynn was the last one to leave through the back door. Michael Flynn picked both boxes casually and put it with the rest of the items in his hand and left through the back door. At this incident, there was a gasp in the back of the courtroom in shock. HHJ Simon Oliver in the meantime had a grin on his face pretending he didn’t know what he was doing. We are unsure if it was the same boxes that were placed in the morning and the early afternoon as it was picked up quite quickly and Michael Flynns back was also turned towards us during this time. If we remember correctly, it was exactly the same boxes as the boxes that were placed there previously did not appear to be there any longer. Michael Flynn placed one box under his left arm and another box in his left hand with a folder and notepad and quietly left through the back door.

On day 2 of the oral hearing:

  • On the second day of the hearing, substantial number of hand gestures started off by HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was more proficient in the hand gestures and he also made facial expressions and gasping noises throughout the day. HHJ Simon Oliver just did hand gestures.
  • The box in the carrier bag was no longer visible from where we were sitting and we believe the box was removed the day earlier was the same box that was no longer there. The second box, we could not see at all.
  • By the end of the morning before lunch, we noticed Michael Flynn give an excess of 30 hand gestures in the form of a wave insinuating he is not interested in the appellants case and the defences. HHJ Simon Oliver did minor hand gestures, probably around 5-10 during this same period.
  • A witness called JR was being cross examined. During the cross examination, Michael Flynn puts his hand over the microphone and asked the appellant to change the question nearly 5-10 times. HHJ Simon Oliver agreed to this. Michael Flynn also continued his hand gestures to another 40-50 in the afternoon. HHJ Simon Oliver also did the same at around 20 times.
  • Michael Flynn started doing facial expressions by moving his head away in a gesture that he is not interested or he is not listening. This happened nearly 30-40 times in the afternoon alone.
  • Michael Flynn started questioning JR about the job but that is as far as his specialist knowledge went. He was actually learning from the witnesses rather than agreeing or disagreeing with the specialist element. Michael Flynn also put his hand up during the appellants cross examination of JR stating he wants to listen to JR and not the appellant. Simon Oliver did the same in addition to Michael Flynn.
  • During the afternoon hearing. Michael Flynn threw his pen on the judicial bench several times, around 10 times in a gesture that he’s fed up of listening to the appellant speak. A racist comment was made at this time that ‘Your the type of person who should just be working at a petrol station’. This was by Michael Flynn and is a racial slur. Due to the appellants unrepresented nature, they didn’t know how to respond. Michael Flynn also tried to put words in their mouth.
  • The appellant spoke in regards to a golliwog matter where staff members at the former employer were carrying golliwogs and the management of the hospital took no action against the perpetrators. HHJ Simon Oliver said to this remark with his hand once again on the microphone ‘Golliwogs are not a racist, it was at once inappropriate’. Michael Flynn had a stern look on his face and nodded yes.
  • During JRs cross examination, HHJ Simon Oliver said to JR ‘Would you like his name on the internet if BJ upholds this case?’. JR responds by saying ‘Well, most hospitals are aware of him and to stay away from him’. HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘That’s good’. This was incredibly concerning as this was an actual request by the judge to one of the witnesses. We do not believe hands were on any microphones at this time so it may have been recorded although HHJ Simon Oliver kept his distance from the microphone quite a bit.
  • Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver puts their hands over the microphone about 3 times whilst they whispered to one another without any other party involved what they were discussing. 

On day 3 of the oral hearing:

  • During the cross examination of GB, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver carried on their hand gestures. Michael Flynn may have carried out 50-60 hand gestures, 20 pen throws on his desk, 30 facial expressions and moving his head away and 2 whispers with Simon Oliver. Michael Flynns hands were once again on the microphone several times that we could not count the amount of times he did it. The same with HHJ Simon Oliver where he nodded his head around 5 times and waved his hand about 20 times.
  • When the appellant questioned GB about JRs statement ‘well, JR said in her statement that……..?’. The appellant was immediately interrupted by Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver saying ‘ no, no, no ,no ,no’ and tapping and banging their hands on the table. Michael Flynn once again nodding several times. HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘That’s now 5 times you have misquoted’. In fact, the appellant did not misquote, it was an actual statement in JRs statement. The hand gestures were far greater on this day and nothing the appellant was saying was being heard.
  • A witness called GB was very honest and said that the appellant has to give the judge a gift if they want a favoured judgement. To this remark, HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand on the microphones and told GB ‘No, no, no!’ and ‘shhhh’ to prevent the appellant finding out what happened earlier on.
  • Michael Flynn started an allegation about the appellant not being qualified and that the appellant lied to an agency they were working with. The appellant stated that a clinical specialist does not have to be qualified and they can practice with an equivalent and they did not lie to any agency or anyone for that matter. Michael Flynn stated ‘Your not qualified’ about 15 times and ‘Yes, you did lie’ about 10 times. This was based on no evidence. The appellant said ‘well, the agency are specialists and they never said that’. Michael Flynn states ‘What, they are more specialist then me!’. The appellant said ‘I don’t know what your knowledge of the field is’. Michael Flynn states ‘Well, that should tell you then’ very rudely whilst still doing hand gestures and putting his hand over microphones. Michael Flynn then asks BJ and the TSOL to ask The Trust ‘Whether the appellant needs to be qualified’. If Michael Flynn was a specialist, he should have no problem answering this question himself rather than asking The Trust. Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver said to the appellant ‘Don’t worry, this isn’t going to form part of the judgement, we just want to know for ourselves, its all OK, don’t worry about it’. HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Yes, don’t worry, its OK’. The response from The Trust came back that the appellant does not have to be qualified to practice so therefore the appellant was correct all along although the judgement does not report this and only reports the fabricated version.
  • When the appellant was being cross examined and was in the dock, HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘Move closer to the microphone, we want to capture all the content so there are not mistakes whilst their hands were on the microphone themselves.
  • Michael Flynn did 3 hand gestures during the appellants cross examination and nearly 20 times rolling his eyes and moving his face in annoyance. HHJ Simon Oliver at this time sat back smirking and grinning behind his hand.
  • Towards the end of the days hearing, HHJ Simon Oliver asked the DBS barrister BJ using hand gestures, whilst his other hand was on the microphone once again about the box that was placed in the corner of the bench on the first day. HHJ Simon Oliver was trying to see if the appellant knew about what happened so that Mr Oliver can protect himself better. BJ said ‘So you gave Mr ‘KA’ a bribe?’ . The appellant responded and said ‘no, i did no such thing. it was a fee KA requested for an employment reference’. On that note, Mr Oliver seemed satisfied that he was protected.

On day 4 of the oral hearing:

  • This day summing up was occurring. BJ spent over 30 minutes we believe on his summing up.
  • HHJ Simon Oliver said to BJ that the appellant was a ‘deserted rat’ to which Michael Flynn nodded his head.
  • When the appellant was summing up their case, Michael Flynn was waving his hand again about 20-30 times as though he is not interested, HHJ Simon Oliver did it 3 times.
  • Michael Flynn shouted out at the appellant during summing up ‘What, you want to work in a hospital?’. The appellant said ‘Yes, i do and i didn’t harm any child or vulnerable adult’. To this response, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver responded ‘Well, that’s what we will consider’. Facial expressions and head movements were occurring during this comment.
  • The appellant put forward a case that their human rights have been breached and the procedure to bar was breached which is correct. Michael Flynn waved his hand at this remark. The appellant further mentioned the golliwog and HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘I already mentioned it yesterday, its not racist, it was made in to a big thing at one time’. This comment was made in a much lower voice away from his microphone.
  • Eventually 10 minutes in to the summing up, Michael Flynn and Simon Oliver once again were putting their hands over the microphones and whispering to one another. This occurred 3 times. Eventually HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand up in gesture of STOP! And thats enough of the appellants summing up when they had another 20 minutes of material to put forward which put forward errors of law and facts.
  • The last issue we remembered when the appellant was asking HHJ Simon Oliver how long will it be before they receive the judgement. He said with a smirk on his face that he will be going on holiday for 3 weeks and so the appellant will not receive the judgement under the end of July 2014. He also stated that he will be on a beach somewhere on a last minute holiday. To this remark, Michael Flynn, Janice Funnell, BJ and others in the back of the courtroom could be heard smirking and laughing. We believe this was HHJ Simon Oliver indirectly implying the contents of the box he retrieved on the first/second of the hearing contained monetary/holiday value and that he will be spending it on a luxury holiday on a beach.
  • The final moment was when the judiciary were leaving, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver with grins of their faces stood up and continued waving their hand at the appellant as though they are not interested for nearly 20 seconds before retiring.

Throughout the hearing, it was only Janice Funnell who acted professionally and listened to both sides but we believe she was looking towards HHJ Simon Oliver to understand what he was doing throughout. We think Janice Funnell has an approach that ’Its a mans world’ rather then act on anything she will observe is wrong. Although our complaint does not relate to her as we had confidence she behaved herself professionally throughout the majority of the hearing.

After observing the judgement, it was clear it was filled with lies, falsehood and deceit and clearly the appellant wasn’t heard. In fact, it would be sensible to say the appellant should not have turned up at the hearing. No safeguarding concerns were identified and no evidence supported the false allegations made against the appellant by the judiciary. The conduct of the judiciary shows they are/were severely biased as even a mere act of impropriety should not exist when handling cases when clearly with the substantial incidents addressed above shows this matter has gone beyond a mere act or a single incident. 

In 2015, the appellant asked the tribunal to reconsider the case under ‘errors of law’. The appellant received a somewhat concerning letter and response from HHJ Simon Oliver basically stating he will in future consider issuing a civil restraint order that the appellant does not agree with his judgement when the appeal was on errors of law. Once again, HHJ Simon Oliver did not respond to the grounds of appeal under errors of law but rather ignored it just like he ignored it at the hearing and at the review of the decision. HHJ Simon Oliver was using his professional powers for personal gain by trying to push the appellant around once again. 

We were also somewhat surprised that HHJ Simon Oliver and other members of the courtroom and judiciary were making a mockery of the court system and communicating with hand gestures the majority of the time and placing hands on microphones throughout the hearing too.

Furthermore, the judiciary, mainly HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn should be suspended from their duties pending disciplinary action against them and also criminal charges placed upon them for:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Bribery under The Bribery Act 2010

  • Misconduct in a public office

  • Money laundering

  • Fraud

  • Misuse of public funds

  • Accessory to corrupting public morals

  • Dishonesty

  • Fraud by abuse of position

Additional charges related to other cases:

  • Sexual harassment

  • Soliciting for sex

  • Sexual assault

Consideration needs to also be given towards whether Kevin Brooks whom is the Government legal departments solicitor should also be prosecuted under the bribery act and for perverting the course of justice for giving and relaying a ‘gift’ to HHJ Simon Oliver from the CEO of the DBS Adele Downey and The Trust.

Complaint made to the Upper Tribunal President – Justice William Charles.

A complaint was made to Justice William Charles of the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber about the issues raised. Initially Justice William Charles ignored all correspondence but after persistence from the appellant for over a year, he responded. He accepted the complaint and investigated it. After 6 weeks of investigating, the conclusion of Justice William Charles was:

  • The appellant was lying but does not support it with evidence. He claims the allegation in ‘incredible’
  • He refuses to investigate the matter of the gift box exchanging hands claiming the allegations are ‘Incredible’ and does not require further investigation.
  • He also claims in his letter that the recordings ‘cannot be retrieved’ on the ‘Dart Server’ and he has not got access to it. No reasons or investigation has been carried out or provided to decide where the recordings have gone. We believe it has been deliberately deleted to cover up the bribe in question and the behaviour complained of.
  • The president of the Upper Tribunal claims the appellants ‘makes matters up’. No evidence is provided to support the claim.

In 2016, the matter progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO) on the procedure of the initial complaint. The outcome was that Justice William Charles has every right not to investigate the complaint as that is his right. A separate police investigation is also underway by the Metropolitan police.

Judicial complaints process:

Judicial Conduct investigations Office (JCIO):

In 2016 and 2017, a complaint was made using the judicial complaints system. As Justice William Charles covered the matter up, the matter was progressed to the Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office who stated that the Tribunal presidents decision or cover up should be progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO). 

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO):

The response from JACO was that Justice William Charles is entitled not to investigate the allegations of Judge Simon Oliver taking bribes. As this cover up now goes to senior levels, we the public must now fight.

Police Investigation:

As of June 2016, HHJ Simon Oliver, Michael Flynn, Justice William Charles and the Government legal departments Solicitor Kevin Brooks are being investigated by London police.

This web page has been created to warn the members of the public and the taxpayer that if you have HHJ Simon Oliver as a Judge, beware, HE TAKES BRIBES. What is even more concerning is his main speciality is the family division of Reading County Court and Safeguarding and he has the potential to damage and destroy other peoples families and lives because he wants bribes and gifts all the time. There is a reason why he places his hands on microphones all the time during the court hearings, it’s because he knows he is doing something wrong that he does not want recorded. The reason he does it is because his superiors are also doing it and encouraging him to do it as well. 

Personal life and the use of male prostitutes

Judge Simon claims he practices religion in his private life and seems to know a little about the religions practices although this is also a fraud considering he takes bribes in his professional life. He is lying to God and to everyone else around him about his faith as he does not practice what he preaches.

In 2016, his wife Elizabeth kicked him out of their family home because it came to light he was using male prostitutes and he was also involved in a gay relationship with another man. Although there is nothing wrong in being gay, it gives credence to the fact that Judge Simon Oliver is so dishonest in his personal life that he would lead his wife on for lengthy periods of time under falsehood and deceit. He lied to his wife, he cheated on her and he hid his sexuality from her too. We can only wonder what she went through. She should be commended for kicking him out of the family home. She should now expose him for the bribes he took throughout his judicial and legal career. Judge Simon Oliver also has two sons. One is Ben Oliver who works for FSP Law in Reading and the other is Edward Oliver who also works as a lawyer as well. Ben Oliver and Simon Oliver have both previously worked together on the same case where Ben is the lawyer representing his client and Simon as the judge. This is without disclosing the relationship to anyone else in the court room. This is another instance of fraud which has resulted innocent people going to prison. It is unknown how many cases have been heard under this guise.

Using rent boys and young adults to satisfy his sexual desires: Judge Simon Oliver is seen out on a date with a young barrister in return for fast track promotions and ‘big case’ wins. Meanwhile his delusional wife sits at home ignoring it.

Allegations of Nipple Tweaking

Judge Simon Oliver has been reported several times of ‘Nipple tweaking’ in the court room. Several unrepresented litigants have observed this and complained about it but to no avail. Judge Oliver is known to use the technique of Nipple tweaking to divert attention from the litigation and refocus elsewhere in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. He continues to use this system until the present day because his employer, the Ministry of Justice encourages him to do this.

HHJ Simon Olivers Home

HHJ Simon Oliver lives a lavish lifestyle in a 5 bedroom house located in the suburbs of Wokingham, Berkshire which is valued at £700,000, far more excessive then his annual salary of £127,000. This is from the proceeds of his criminal activities. His son Benjamin states he has never seen any of his fathers money but he strangely forgets the big house that is fully paid for from bribe money and extortion.

The address is:

Glenwood, 20 Lowther Road, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG41 1JD.

The house that was built by perverting the course of justice – Judge Simon Olivers residence which has been built by criminal proceeds of bribes and money laundering which he has been involved in for several decades. Thames Valley Police have installed a special alarm in his house so they can look after their special friend.

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fraud investigations initiate if Judge Simon Oliver is challenged by litigants

Many people have reported that when they have challenged judge Simon Oliver on his decision-making skills, conduct, behaviour, or even take their case to social media, are subjected to department of work and pensions (DWP) fraud investigations. This is usually based on false allegations made by judge Simon Oliver in an attempt to sabotage the litigants financial means. Simon Oliver has direct connections in the department of work and pensions and can initiate fraud investigations within four weeks. Unfortunately, fabricated fraud Investigations by another government department is not the duty of the DWP and should certainly not be financed by the taxpayer. The vast majority of litigants who challenged Simon Oliver are cleared of any wrongdoing. In fact, the only person that really does any fraud is actually Simon Oliver himself by using his ‘gifts’ and money laundering tactics using the court process. Several other litigants involved in family cases have had their housing benefit revoked and are evicted from their homes just so that Simon Oliver does not have to rule it in their favour. The excuse that he uses is that they do not have appropriate accommodation to accommodate a child when it was Simon Oliver who organised it in the first place. It’s obvious by reading the comments on this site that the only one that is involved in fraud and money laundering is actually Simon Oliver. He is also protected by government legal department, the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police. The Berkshire Freemasons are not that far off either. They have protected him for decades knowing full well of his criminal activities. None of these departments and bodies have ever bothered even investigating him.

Thames Valley Police

Thames Valley Police (TVP) have also been implicated in criminal activities involving judge Simon Oliver. In fact, they have a very good relationship with each other and he regularly attends functions and Christmas parties at Reading police station. TVP are fully aware of Simon Oliver’s activities involving child abductions, bribe taking, freemasonry and other criminal activities. Several people have reported that Simon Oliver uses Thames Valley Police to attend other people’s properties to assault them and steal their possessions. They also enforce fraudulent court orders which have been faked using an unknown judge to steal positions or obtain material that Simon Oliver can use for blackmail purposes. Children have also been abducted in a similar manner. Simon Oliver has direct connections with senior members of TVP who are also allegedly Freemasons. When complaints are made to TVP about this inappropriate relationship between them and Simon Oliver, they refuse to acknowledge or respond to such requests. Other police forces use similar tactics to avoid discussing the matter either. Because of this very good relationship that Simon Oliver has with the police, he is never subjected to any criminal investigation but he is certainly protected by them because they have installed an alarm in his home with direct response by all police in the TVP catchment area. This was upgraded by the Ministry of Justice. The purpose of this alarm is so that judge Simon Oliver can continue doing his criminal activities and being protected at the same time (by using tax payer money to do so)

Berkshire Freemasons

Judge Simon Oliver is a senior member in the cult organisation called The Berkshire Freemasons. He uses this Freemasonry connection to pervert the course of justice and carry out more criminal activity. Many judges, lawyers, police inspectors and other senior figures in government use this Freemasonry connection to prevent the wider public receiving justice. Something which the tax payer already pays for. Judge Simon Oliver uses his Freemasonry connection, not only in Berkshire but also in Didcot and London. He claims its only ‘for fun’ but there is nothing fun about the horrific ordeals others in the public have to go through because of him. Since his wife kicked him out, he uses Sindlesham courts address for correspondence. But please note, he does not live here, this is where he gets his mail. It is part of the masonic lodge which he is a member of. This masonic lodge is the headquarters of the Berkshire Freemasons which is a secret cult society.

The address of the Berkshire Freemasons is:

Sindlesham Court, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire, England, RG41 5EA.

The Fraud and Money Laundering Empire explained: This premises is paid for by the taxpayers and the bribes and gifts he has received during the course of his career by lying, misrepresenting, colluding, cheating, stealing and fraud against innocent members of the public. It seems like lying, cheating and taking bribes has paid off for Simon Oliver.
The Worshipful Brother Judge Simon Oliver: In his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. He uses this association to commit more crimes in court but being protected by fellow Freemasons who encourage him to do this. He is protected by his senior Freemasons in his lodge because they also need his assistance to launder money. The crimes he commits is taking bribes, legal child abductions and committing fraud on a mass scale.

2017 and 2018

In 2017, his wife allowed him to come back home.

Benjamin Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Benjamin Oliver is the son of judge Simon Oliver. He currently works as a partner in Field, Seymour, Parkes (FSP) law based in Reading. He specialises in creating wills, inheritance, control of trusts and lasting power of attorneys. Ben Oliver uses his position to launder his father’s criminal money using his speciality in probate law. Ben has also come before his father in court where Simon Oliver was the judge and his son Ben was the lawyer representing one of the parties. This was without disclosing to anyone their relationship so they could maximise the amount of money that they can make. Many people who challenge Simon Oliver’s behavior and his fabricated judgements usually are attacked by FSP law. Ben Oliver targets the litigant in order to destroy them. He liaises with Thames Valley Police to do this as well. Ben has also advised his clients that they have to give 5-figure sums to his firm so that they can pass it on to Simon Oliver and guarantee a favourable judgement. None of these allegations have been defended by Simon Oliver or Ben Oliver. Ben Oliver has also worked as a crown prosecutor to prosecute parents in family law cases in Westminster magistrates court. This was most likely because his father Simon asked him to do it.

Ben Oliver attended Warwickshire university and gained a first class honours degree in economics. He graduated in 2009. He then attended the Guildford college of law to complete further qualifications in law and eventually gaining an LLM in 2011. He has since worked at FSP law from 2011 until the present day eventually becoming a partner. The reason Ben Oliver did a degree in economics first was because his grades were not good enough to do a law degree as a direct entry from college. He eventually overcame this after he received his economics degree. Since then he has been committing heinous acts of criminal activity as a solicitor whilst being covered up by his father Simon Oliver and and their association with Thames Valley Police which prevents them from being prosecuted.

Ben Oliver – Simon Oliver’s son Ben Oliver also known as FSP laws one and only ‘deputy child abductor’. Ben works alongside his father Simon also committing vile acts of crimes where he uses his economics degree to advise clients how to bribe judges and launder money.

Ben Oliver is married to a woman called Kathleen Norton and they both have two children. They live in Basingstoke in a million pound mansion. This has been bought by all the criminal money the father and son team have made from bribes and other criminal activities at the expense of the taxpayer and the public.

Ben Oliver and his wife Kathleen Norton – Simon and Ben Oliver protect their own children (and grandchildren) whilst targeting and abusing other peoples children (and laundering money at the same time). Ben Oliver is a disgrace just like his father. These two products of the Oliver household are now reproducing to continue the crimes they inflict on society upon generation after generation.

Edward Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Edward Oliver is Simon Oliver’s second son. He also works in the legal industry. He’s not a current practising solicitor or barrister and tries to keep away from his father’s bad reputation. He is also married but has no children.

Edward Oliver and his wife standing in Simon Olivers back garden – Edward is the second son of Simon Oliver but he is too embarrassed of his fathers behaviour that he chooses to keep a low profile. We are sure he’s also laundering money and bringing harm to society one way or another, it just happens, he’s a closed case.

The Worshipful Company of the Horners

Judge Simon Oliver is also affiliated with the livery organisation called The Worshipful Company of the Horners. This organisation also has judges, lawyers and police officers, all working in a cult committing more fraud and crimes against the public. Mr Oliver was inducted into this organisation in 2018. He currently is still an active member and continues to bring shame upon them.  

Bringing shame and embarrassment on the Horners: Judge Simon Oliver being inducted in to a livery group in an attempt to launder money and collude with other professionals in industry.

The address of the Horners is:

The Hall, The Painters Hall, 9 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V 2AD.

Allegations of manipulating appeals in higher courts

Judge Simon Oliver has been caught manipulating and attempting to manipulate appeals in the higher courts to pervert justice. Lies that Simon Oliver wrote in his original judgement are then made worse if it is appealed. A search of Reading court uncovered evidence of this heinous crime to which Mr Oliver to this date has not responded to.

Attempting to pervert the course of justice: Judge Simon Oliver giving specific instructions to the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeals made against his order by a vulnerable adult. This denies justice to litigants and promotes and encourages criminal activity using the court process.

Practicing under false qualifications

Judge Simon Oliver has on numerous occasions been practicing under false qualifications. It has been gathered from reliable sources that Mr Oliver, prior to 2012 did not hold a Court of Protection license but was still hearing those cases which resulted in individuals being illegally asset seized. In other judgements, Mr Oliver claimed he was the ‘President of the Queens Bench Division’ of the High Court, a designated title he does not have authority to use, let alone have. 

A liar and a cheater exposed practicing under false qualifications: Judge Simon Oliver IS NOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION and neither he ever was. He is once against caught lying but not to his own detriment but that of his victims.

Jordan Publishing

In late 2017 and early 2018, HHJ Simon Oliver was working with Jordan Publishing to write his own book on special needs and the law. He published his book in November 2017 in Foyles bookstore in London. An image is shown below of this. The book is filled with lies and completely against reality. He had a deal with Jordan Publishing as one of his ‘Gifts’ from a solicitor who HHJ Simon Oliver works with in Reading. It is somewhat very concerning he is writing books now talking about special needs when in fact he is responsible for creating most of the special needs in children by behaving the way he does (taking bribes). Furthermore, he treats vulnerable people and people with special needs like rubbish and he mentions no where in his book about the bribes he takes and the requests for bribes (In the form of ‘gifts’ and ‘loans’).

Publishing lies in a book with the assistance of Jordan Publishing: HHJ Simon Oliver giving a speech at Foyles book store in London talking about his new book on special needs. A deal he most probably received through collusion and bribery in the first place. Unfortunately his book does not appear to be that popular as only 3 people turned up. 

Chairing conferences on special education needs

In June 2019, Mr Oliver was chairing a conference on special education needs in London claiming to be an expert in the field (when we know he isn’t). He sat there pretending to be interested when in fact in reality he treats people with special needs like dirt. The comments on this website and several other websites is evidence of it. This whole program was fabricated for the purposes of having confidence in him. Obviously no one at the conference was aware of Mr Olivers past or even if they were, they chose to ignore it.  Strangely so, he chose not to tweak his nipples at this event! Its probably because there were too many people there watching and it would not be appropriate to have so many witnesses to his crimes.

The DEPRIVER of liberty safeguards – Judge Simon Oliver chairing a conference on special education needs and trying to look professional in the process. In reality, Mr Oliver practices under false qualifications. Obviously no one had the audacity to stand up and ask him questions about his disgusting past which includes taking bribes, rapes and murders.

High Court proceedings in 2019 and 2020

Judge Simon Oliver initiated legal proceeding in the High Court in London against a former medical practitioner accusing them of being the publisher of this site. These were lies. He accused and gave sanctions against someone that was ‘suited’ for his lies. The individual concerned has commented on this site to clear their own name and accused Judge Simon Oliver of inventing the allegation and colluding with the High Court to get it falsely substantiated and then using the media to create fake articles stating that he was subjected to an attempted ‘Anthrax attack’. No evidence is supplied of these lies. These proceedings were financed by the Ministry of Justice and their Director Sir Richard Heaton (someone whose already being accused several times on the internet of being a paedophile). Mr Oliver did not state the allegations made on this site are false but just that he felt ‘Harassed’. We will let you use your own imagination to decide how pitiful of a response that is.

Government Legal Department attack Judges Behaving Badly to protect Freemason Simon Oliver

In 2020, web hosters in America were contacted by the Government Legal Department requesting this blog be taken offline. This attempt was based of fictional claims and did not work. America refused the request because America is a more reliable and superior country. The allegations relied upon were once again complete and utter lies and the level of dishonesty is unbelievable. The Government Legal Department stated that America is going to be held in contempt in a UK court. Obviously, America was not afraid and told the Government Legal Department where to go. So Freemason Judge Simon Oliver is once again back to the drawing board thinking of what to do next. The Government Legal Departments letter is published below.

Bullying and harassing web hosters in America: Judge Simon Oliver has been laughingly styled as ‘His Honour’ attempting to get this site down using fake court orders and tax payers money to attempt to cover up his crimes. It is a pitiful attempt which failed. 

False allegations of anthrax attacks

In December 2019, Judge Simon Oliver falsely accused a medical practitioner of plotting an anthrax attack against him and then distributed these allegations in the media. These allegations were completely and utterly fabricated and the only reason they were made was to racially harass an individual purely because they were Muslim and from a certain cultural background and libelling them in the process. No evidence has ever been produced supporting these allegations. The articles that have been published is a clear indication that Simon Oliver has no boundaries when he wants to instigate a hate crime against civilians and is prepared to use negative stereotypes against a specific religion to bolster his position as a victim. The claims that Mr Oliver was subjected to an attempt of an anthrax attack was never reported to the police and has never been reported to any anti-terrorist organisation. Mr Oliver and his legal team have only published this in the media to the detriment of all Muslims and continues to refuse to log this as a police report. The individual that Mr Oliver had been targeting has previously being falsely accused by Mr Oliver of being a paedophile and once again distributed in the media.

A ‘Victim’ of an ‘attempted’ anthrax attack: Judge Simon Oliver took to the media to label himself as a victim of a terrorist act. The allegation was invented by the Ministry of Justice to ruin a medical doctors reputation so they could protect Mr Oliver, his lodge and his rings.

Allegations of racism

Mr Oliver has previously himself been accused of making racial comments in the courtroom. These comments range from referring to African Caribbeans as ‘horse nostril’ and referring to Asians as ‘you should only be working in a corner shop’. He has been shown to have a strong history of making negative judgements against people of ethnicity, predominately of the black and minority backgrounds.

Pre-written judgements

Judge Simon Oliver and his network are regularly known to writing pre-written judgements. These are judgements and orders that have been written in advance of a hearing or any evidence being presented. This is perverting the course of justice as well as misconduct in a public office. Recent examples include a judgement given in the High court in December 2019 was pre-written by Simon Oliver for his own benefit. The evidence relied upon for this assertion is because Mr Olivers legal team published the judgement 12 days prior (29th November 2019) to the High court handing down this judgement on their own website with Matrix chambers. The metadata of this document has also been removed. The official hand down by the High court was the 10th of December 2019. No defence to this allegation has been made by Matrix chambers or Simon Oliver. The corruption is overwhelming and when Judge Simon Oliver is accused of corruption and bribery, he then commits more corruption and bribery to defend himself which involves casually forging documents and writing judgements beforehand to harm the original victims.

Evidence of a pre-written judgement: Judge Simon Oliver and Matrix chambers uploaded a copy of the approved judgement 12 days before it was handed down by the High Court on to the Matrix chambers website. The conclusion is that this was a kangaroo court. Something Mr Oliver has already been accused of thousands of times.

Black Lives Matter: African-Carribbean organised child abductions

In December 2019 and January 2020, several media publications in Ghana and Nigeria appeared accusing Judge Simon Oliver of rituals and organised child abductions from individuals mainly from the African community. Several parents who had their children taken away by Mr Oliver were banned from contacting their children whilst his connections ‘Lose’ children in the system. If the parents do try to contact their children, Judge Oliver imprisons them and then after their sentence deports them back to their African countries whilst their children are still in care. Its a technique Mr Oliver uses to prevent contact between children and parents whilst paedophile rings take over. Examples of this include the Musa and the Adajo family who have since been deported.

Black lives do matter: Judge Simon Oliver making headlines in West Africa where accusations of racially motivated negative judgements are being made against the African community. This is similar to allegations of terrorist activities falsely made by Mr Oliver against Muslims.

Several allegations have also been made again Mr Oliver. These consist of:

  • Making false claims in the media of being the victim of an anthrax attack by a Muslim NHS worker

  • Referring to African Carribbean litigants as ‘Horse nostril’

  • Regularly using racist language and stereotypes against black and ethnic minorities

  • Using rent boys for sexual gratification

  • Working with false qualifications as a Court of Protection judge when he does not hold a nominated license

  • Withholding medical certificates in cases involving extremely vulnerable adults

  • Refusing to comply with human rights legislation. More specifically but not limited to article 6, 8 and 10

  • Going into the back with social workers and other litigants with evidence and coming back out laughing and joking

  • Using limited companies to claim state funds to look after children he has put into care

  • Working with social services to carry out kangaroo courts where members of the public are at a disadvantage and having their children ‘stolen’

  • Working with the government department the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) to dismiss appeals and accuse innocent health professionals and teachers of being paedophiles whilst boxes are passed to him in court called ‘gifts’

  • Laundering tax payers moneys into offshore bank accounts under different names

  • Requesting from an appellant he requires a Porsche 911 car in return for a favourable judgement

  • Requesting from appellants he requires between £6000-£20,000+ in return for favourable judgements

  • Fabricating judicial judgements and orders in return for obtaining state funds for foster care 

  • Working with CID from Thames Valley Police to execute fabricated search and arrest warrants in return for stealing drugs and money from homes of known criminals and then using the seized items to sell to rival criminals for a fee

  • Being invited to Social services and Thames Valley Police Christmas parties and regularly playing golf with them

  • Refusing to comply with release orders from higher courts and under Human rights legislation’s

  • Using the judicial complaints system for racketeering purposes

  • Mr Oliver has also been allegedly involved in gang rapes of teenagers in care

  • Allegations of murder with the assistance and support of rogue officers from Thames Valley Police 

  • Requesting his court clerk Freddy Cutts to contact appellants and opponents legal teams (solicitors and barristers offices) in current court cases to ask for ‘loans’ and ‘gifts’ (bribes)

  • Mr Oliver has also been involved in contacting legal firms and requesting they desist from representing their clients in return for future favoured judgements and ‘big case wins’ to prevent his money laundering and fraud operations from being detected

If you have concerns about this judge or any other judge, please comment on the section provided below. Judges taking bribes are very common in the judicial system in the UK. Its called ‘The Gift System’. Its only when they get caught is when you see how the complaints process works which is a fraud itself. Judges even took bribes in the form of gift boxes in the Stephen Lawrence case but no one was held to account.

If you have any issues or problems in regards to the conduct of this judge, we advise you contact the police, obtain a crime report or crime reference number and leave it in the comments below so police complaints against this man can be recorded internationally. It is unlikely the police will record your complaint as the police refuse to act on criminals like this because its not good for their own business so if that is the case, just add your allegations in the comments below instead.

Lets take one small step for the taxpayer and the hard-working member of the public and one giant leap to exposing HHJ Simon Oliver as a corrupt judge who is guilty of dishonesty. bribery and criminal activity.

If you have any concerns and would like to send information or documents confidentially, please contact us on

jbb-blog@protonmail.com.

We do not answer all E-Mails but we do read everything.

Thank you for reading

2,505 comments

  2. LOOK AT THIS RUBBISH!

    They must think the public just fell off a turnip truck.

    This is all theatre. Firstly, he is retired and his pension is safe no matter what. He has nothing to lose. Secondly, what law did he break back then? Is there a law called “Acting Inappropriately”? The answer is no.

    Men have been abusing women in the workplace for decades and, especially in the police, all the other guys would join in too. This is just play acting for the benefit of the public who are wise to the fact that there is corruption at a senior level in Thames Valley Police and nothing is being done about it. If no law existed back then, even if he is accused of breaking it – then what can be done. NOTHING.

    They watch this website and should, quite rightly, be getting a bit hot under the collar. So this is all for the public’s benefit. The so-called offender is not obligated to even turn up.

    ACTING INAPPROPRIATELY is Thames Valley Police not investigating crime, and perverting the course of justice. It is a serious offence that the hierarchy should be facing. Instead they are using this guy as some kind of scapegoat. Are they also thick?

    News

    14th May
    Thames Valley Police Officer misconduct hearing

    Thames Valley Police HQ in Kidlington

    A RETIRED police officer is accused of ‘acting inappropriately’ for more than a decade towards four younger female colleagues.

    PC Alan Nisbet, who retired in November, will now face the heads of the force at a misconduct hearing OVER THE PHONE.

    This week he will give his version of events against the claims that he treated four women with a ‘lack of respect and courtesy’ for more than 10 years between 2008 and 2019.

    Read more: the 13 Oxfordshire police officers facing misconduct hearings

    If found guilty, the former Thames Valley Police officer, who was last based in Milton Keynes, will have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour expected of him in relation to the clauses Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.

    As a result his name could be put on the police black list and he will never be able to work for any police force again – including as a volunteer.

    Due to coronavirus the hearing will take place over the phone in private. (LOL)

    4 comments

    Der Biffer 22 hrs ago
    7 So no actual punishment then if the decision goes against him. Why waste time, and therefore money, when nothing will happen to prevent or deter this sort of behaviour? Oh, it’s our money. I forgot! Silly me.

    art carter 18 hrs ago

    0 think the word RETIRED tells us that it wont affect him in the slightest.

    40UP 18 hrs ago
    0 What a waste of time and money.

    Fly1986 18 hrs ago
    2 Retired is the key. Though the fact they’ve mentioned volunteer suggests to me he may have been working on a front desk somewhere to while away his days counting paperclips.
    That said he’ll be on a full police pension that they cannot touch. Excuse the pun!
    £100k in the bank and £1500 a month until the day he dies.
    He’ll take his money and go sit in his garden with two fingers up to the head of PSD. 🙂
    Much like I do.

    Last Updated: 4 hrs ago

    https://www.heraldseries.co.uk/news/18451444.thames-valley-police-officer-misconduct-hearing/

  3. The top dogs at the Ministry of Justice should be investigated, along with successive Lord Chief Justices. If they cannot keep criminals from operating within the justice system, then either they are part of the cartel or they are not fit for their jobs.

    Are they all hiding under stones?

    Did someone say something about Ian from Essex?

  4. Photo of John Hemming John Hemming Liberal Democrat, Birmingham, Yardley

    I accept the hon. Gentleman’s point, but I could cite a specific case. I have not got the reference on me, but I could give it to him by e-mail later if he is interested. The case involves a published judgment where the court had a court order saying that the doctor is not allowed to provide evidence to the GMC. There is a High Court order to say that that evidence must not be provided. That cannot be right. If that order got to the Supreme Court it would be struck down, but there is a problem with the appellate process and a real challenge with all these things.

    Clause 7(2), perhaps the most important part of the Bill, is to prevent cover-ups. Most substantial cover-ups involve people being threatened or pressed to prevent them from complaining to regulators. That clearly happened with Hillsborough and the Savile paedophile network, where children were punished for complaining. Although details of what sort of offence should be involved needs to be left for consideration in Committee, this absolutely key change is needed. The USA already has in its criminal code elements that protect complainants from the prosecution apparatus.

    On “Matters relating to court proceedings”, clause 8(1) deals with the problem that Mr Hain faced. The judiciary do at times make use of defamation law, which is entirely right, but people should not face criminal proceedings for making truthful statements about the operation of the legal system.

    Clause 8(2) deals with the imprisonment of people in secret for contempt—quite a few people are in prison for contempt. The Official Solicitor is supposed to protect their interests, but nothing much seems to happen. I wrote to him and asked him, “What do you do about people who are in prison for contempt?” and he did not tell me anything—he just said, “I suppose we’re supposed to do something.”

    Deborah Paul, a London mother, was imprisoned earlier this year. Those who are aware of her case believe that it was an oppressive act. There is no formal report. Although in theory the step of imprisonment is supposed to happen in open court, in practice, a court flashes into public session in the blink of an eye and goes back in camera—it might as well not bother. Clause 8(2) would protect contemnors from oppressive imprisonment and the abuse of power by the court.

    Clause 8(3) would assist in dealing with cover-ups. For people to challenge public authorities, they need particularly deep pockets. The problem is the uncertainty as to what costs they face paying if they lose the application. The court has developed through the common law protection in limited circumstances. A more general application of a pre-emptive costs order would allow people to challenge bodies such as the GMC or local authorities about wrongly given planning permission without having to bet the farm. I would wish for an element of one-way cost-shifting for judicial review, but in the interests of compromise and so that progress is made, I have suggested a smaller shift towards the power of the individual against the state.

    Clause 9 is on the activities of the Official Solicitor. As it stands, the Official Solicitor is accountable merely to secret court proceedings. I know of a number of cases in which people have wrongly had their mental capacity removed—they are then submitted to the decisions of the Official Solicitor. RP v. UK—I made an application to the European Court of Human Rights to assist RP and her brother—demonstrates how cataclysmic a wrongful removal of mental capacity can be. RP’s GP and a second expert have indicated that she had mental capacity and was not too stupid to instruct a solicitor, but the system—all the way through—wrongly treated her as somebody who does not have mental capacity.

    In order to appeal, a party needs a transcript of the judgment. However, that is often far too difficult to obtain—I am having problems with a constituency case in that respect. The official recording is frequently lost. The simple solution to the problem would be to allow people to take their own recordings, so that they can produce their own transcript.

    On clause 11—“Right to assert litigation capacity”—when somebody has been deemed too stupid to instruct a solicitor and has normally had the Official Solicitor appointed as a litigation friend, it is almost impossible to get a solicitor to act to challenge such an appointment. The clause would make it clear that someone can challenge the appointment of a litigation friend. The proposal in RP v. UK that the Official Solicitor should be asked to review the appointment did not work in the case of Lee Gilliland, a gentleman in Bristol who had his mental capacity removed because he did not trust public authorities. He found himself evicted without notice, because the Official Solicitor did not tell him he was about to be evicted.

    I would happily accept in Committee that clause 12 —“Ambit of reasonableness and capacity”—is too advanced and progressive for the English system, but it is worth considering. It would make the lives of those who have limited capacity much better. It is based on a clause from a province of Canada that tries to limit the controls exercised on people who are deemed not to have capacity. I am particularly concerned about the imprisonment of people using mental capacity. The deprivation of liberty safeguards are clearly inadequate in that they are overwhelmingly subject to conflicts of interest. I remain concerned about a constituent who was, in my view, wrongly imprisoned using that mechanism in order to prevent the investigation of a crime. However, the issue needs detailed consideration in Committee.

    Link to this speech In context Individually
    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HC Deb, 26 October 2012, c1208)

    https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-10-26a.1189.2&s=hemming+secret+prisoners#g1208.1

  5. Nadine Dorries Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire

    Given that there are court transcribers, one would assume that anybody attending the court would have a right to the transcription when a judgment has been passed in their case. Not only is it not possible always to get a transcription, but when it is possible, it takes a considerable length of time. In that considerable length of time, the appeal is in abeyance and kept waiting—it cannot be lodged.

    Link to this speech In context Individually
    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HC Deb, 26 October 2012, c1210)

    https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-10-26a.1189.2&s=hemming+secret+prisoners#g1208.1

  6. 09/09/2018

    VIDEO:

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1
    Consciousness in Action, ITNJ, Politics, Sovereignty / Law, Uncategorized, Videos

    The Crown versus The People: The Story of Gedaljahu Ebert and the collusion of banks, insolvency practitioners and the courts to defraud him of an estate worth £1.2 Billion. Ebert walks us through the scam and explains how courts, banks and the ‘system’ conspire to asset-strip and fraudulently force bankruptcy on millions of people. Once we learn these hidden truths we will then have the ammunition to take back our power, reclaim our assets and force a re-set of the entire parasitic system once and for all. The time has come…..Arise Homo sapiens!

  7. VIDEO

    Michelle Young fraudulent bankruptcy and abuse of legal process

  9. Member of Parliament, Paul Flynn:

    Operation Tiberius, corruption, serious organised crime, police, Freemasons, etc.

  10. CRIMINALS WORKING FROM INSIDE HMRC STOLE PATRICK CULLINANE’S ASSETS

    You are now aware, from MP, Paul Flynn’s speak in the House of Commons about Operation Tiberius, that the report revealed that serious organised crime has infiltrated almost (perhaps all) government department. So this is no joke. It is a fact that HMRC chased him, using official channels, such as police and high court sheriffs, for 250K, when he was owed a rebate because he paid income tax out of every paycheck and certainly did not owe a penny.

    So, just like Len Lawrence, Patrick Cullinane was another one who was literally thrown into the streets with only the clothes on his back, with no means to pay for shelter or food.

    No government official or politician would help him. No solicitor would help him. We do know that the legally-trained criminals keep blacklists so that victims will not be represented in court. There must be many thousands of cases where this takes place because we know of a number of cases where this happens.

    They are not one-offs. It is organised criminality.

    He lost everything, including his fiancee, the support of his family who thought he had done something wrong, his entire future in which he planned to start a family, and his health.

  11. A top-flight journalist flew from the USA to come and help Patrick Cullinane, and found absolute proof of the fraud and criminal abuse inflicted upon Patrick by HRMC, but still nobody in the government or the so-called legal system would help him. The journalist, Christopher Fogarty, published an article about the case in the Irish-American News as, true to form, British mainstream media work for the government and not the people. So they did nothing for him.

    http://www.fmotl.com/IrishAmericanNews-September2009…_files/image002.jpg

    September 2009

    Irish-American News
    by Christopher Fogarty

    A FREE BRITAIN? Progress accelerates. Last December, this column reported that Limerickman, London-resident Patrick Cullinane, is finally getting justice.

    Inland Revenue (Britain’s IRS) had fabricated a tax claim against him for a few thousand pounds, for which they liened his £170,000 home, got bailiffs, and seventeen police officers to evict him from it, sold it, and kept the entire proceeds.

    The gov’t then abetted the IR’s crimes Soviet-style by getting a psychiatrist to declare Cullinane’s complaints evidence of “paranoid disorder.”

    He is lucky to have survived the coordinated official criminals.

    He credits honest Englishman/Reporter Phillip Inman and his Guardian newspaper, the IAN, and now his M.P., Gareth Thomas.

    Cullinane’s case’s recent status review, held in his MP’s office, showed progress. It is gratifying that MP Thomas regrets having once wished Cullinane would permanently disappear. For Cullinane, we expect prompt compensation for all of the losses inflicted by IR crimes (and abetted by High Court Judges), though he can never be compensated for the two decades of misery.

    Cullinane’s local newspapers trumpet “SERVING THE BOROUGH OF HARROW” while actually covering up Irish cases like Cullinane’s, reducing its Irish community.

    BRITAIN’S PROBLEM is systematic injustice. Scores, if not hundreds, of English have contacted me in their doomed pursuits of justice. The injustice cannot end; not until judges, lawyers, M.P.s et al join the burgeoning movement to stop swearing oaths to uphold the Crown and, instead, begin to swear to uphold justice. Currently, the Crown and Crown-connected prevail in court against everyone else. Our 1776 rebels rescued the US from that system.

    CULLINANE sends me data on English veterinarian/aviator Maurice Kirk. Kirk had a dispute with someone better-connected. That person managed to get the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to deprive Kirk of his livelihood. Kirk was later charged with a Mickey Mouse gun violation and is now, after a 24-day hunger strike, incarcerated in a secure Mental Health Unit, with only family members allowed to visit him. His pursuit of basic rights constitutes “evidence” of his insanity.

    NORMAN SCARTH, a WW2 Murmansk-run veteran and “proud Englishman until aged 70,” authored a book on judicial corruption, and later won a landmark case in the European Court of Human Rights. It forced the UK gov’t to cease holding trials in camera, to make them public and open, a vital change hated by many British judges and lawyers.

    Eighty four-year-old Scarth writes: “I became a marked man. Two potentially-lethal terror attacks failed to silence me, so I was stitched up (framed) for a NONEXISTENT ‘crime’ & given a sentence to ensure that I’d die in prison. Well, I didn’t die, & after 4 years had ‘Paid my Debt to Society,’ due for release. Instead, I was UNLAWFULLY carted off to a Stalinist ‘Mental Hospital’, NOT as a patient, but a captive, just as much as Terry Waite, Brian Keenan, John McCarthy in Beirut, Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, Ken Bigley & Margaret Hassan in Iraq.

    The Government were mad keen that I be pumped full of drugs to destroy my brain, but the few honest nurses refused to be party to such depravity, & I escaped the fate of Andy McCardle (reportedly murdered in custody:

    See News of the World’s “State-Sponsored Murder,” After a year & a half I was given a new psychiatrist who proved less a State puppet than the others, but even he feared rocking the boat too much, & went through a pretence of ‘rehabilitation’ for 6 months before giving me a clean bill of health. I now have another case in the ECtHR against the UK – Application Number 57035/08.”

    G E O R G E F A R Q U H A R addressed Scotland’s parliament: “… In addition to my trial, which was a Kangaroo Court, and that corrupt act to veil the truth, I am currently detained in the Royal Edinburgh hospital clinic for the criminally insane. During three months as a political prisoner, I’ve been forcibly injected nine times against my will with high doses of antipsychotic drugs while being held down by numerous hospital staff. That major abuse of human rights for taking video footage of a corrupt police officer is just one of the numerous cover-ups directed against my efforts to expose Governmental child abuse. I should be in the street, non-violently campaigning, not incarcerated and drugged up like an insane criminal.”

    “PARANOIA” was another Crown psychiatrist’s evaluation of an IRA volunteer-turned-MI5 mole who feared being found and killed. The ex-mole was doomed until MI5 informed the psychiatrist that his fear was valid.

    Thus, every case of British “insanity” I know of was wrongfully diagnosed. The IRA traitor and the gov’t-persecuted Maurice Kirk, Carmel Franklin, Norman Scarth, Margaret Gomm, George Wescott, Olga Myers, Dafydd Morgan, Pauline Bridge, Peter Oakes, Jean Hooper, George Farquhar, Linda Drew, Shirley Lintern 43 RIP, Arnold McCardle—(murdered in Carstairs State Mental Hospital) and Patrick Cullinane, were all further attacked by gov’t psychiatrists.

    British officialdom sees justice-seekers as “pests,” easily labelled “stalkers.” Recent Crown legislation mandates indefinite incarceration without trial of “stalkers” of officialdom. Britain is split. Much of it advances toward a republic of sovereign citizens instead of subjects, while the Crown-privileged remnant is becoming a full-blown tyranny with ubiquitous Soviet-style “psychiatrists.” – END.

    SEE FULL ARTICLE: http://www.fmotl.com/IrishAmericanNews-September2009….htm

  12. THE GUARDIAN

    Sat 2 Jul 2005 01.19 BST

    Tax experts call for a bill of rights
    A series of reports critical of the Inland Revenue’s officials and procedures have prompted demands for clear guidance.

    Phillip Inman reports

    Tax experts this week called on the government to support a bill of rights for taxpayers following a series of critical reports which between them claimed Inland Revenue officials were overzealous in their pursuit of “unpaid” taxes and “overpaid” tax credits.

    The reports, from the parliamentary ombudsman, Citizens Advice, National Audit Office and Inland Revenue watchdog the Adjudicator, highlighted serious deficiencies in procedures and the poor handling, in many instances, of individual cases by the Revenue.

    The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIoT) said a revised taxpayers’ charter or bill of rights would force the Revenue to give taxpayers clear guidance before it could send out fines, make demands for unpaid tax or embark on investigations. It would also provide taxpayers, especially those who cannot afford an accountant, with a clear set of rules to use if launching an appeal.

    Anne Redston of the CIoT says: “At the moment the scales are tipped in favour of the taxman and a bill of rights would even up the scales and produce a fairer system.”

    Leading tax barrister and human rights advocate, Phillip Baker QC, backed the campaign. He says in other countries, like the US and Australia, they have a charter detailing the rights of taxpayers. Mr Baker says: “The activities of a Revenue officer can ruin someone’s life. Sometimes even more so than a criminal prosecution and being sent to prison. They can lose everything.”

    One person who says his life was destroyed following a Revenue investigation is Patrick Cullinane, a former film stage hand who worked at Pinewood and Shepperton and was investigated by Revenue officers in the late 80s.

    The Revenue alleged he was moonlighting between casual jobs and renting out rooms in his house to earn extra income. Mr Cullinane denied both allegations. He employed an accountant to clean up his tax affairs but the accountant was unable to convince the Revenue that neither allegation was true.

    The Revenue asked for more than £60,000 in unpaid tax. Mr Cullinane refused to pay. He fought the case up to the commissioners, which adjudicate in tax disputes, but lost.

    Attempts to overturn the order in the courts failed after the Revenue refused to release crucial documents from his file.

    Mr Cullinane’s friends, including builder Neil Woodward, who embarrassed the Revenue three years ago when he overturned his bankruptcy order, have spent the past year piecing together a dossier of rule breaches by the Revenue in Mr Cullinane’s case.

    They have been forced to trawl through Civil Procedure rules and the Taxes Management Act. They claim the breaches are a damning indictment of the Revenue’s conduct and point to a miscarriage of justice.

    Revenue ‘withheld vital information’

    Patrick Cullinane alleges the Inland Revenue failed to provide vital information at the hearing which led to his bankruptcy. Also, it failed to follow basic procedures which would have given him a clue about the allegations he faced.

    Without a taxpayers’ bill of rights, Mr Cullinane has been forced to trawl through the Civil Procedure rules which give all courts and quasi courts, like the Inland Revenue general commissioners, a code of conduct.

    Rule 48.3 requires a party “to make a reasonable search for documents” and “must include documents adversely affecting its own case”.

    The Revenue was later shown to have records detailing PAYE payments by Mr Cullinane which may have assisted his case. They also show he overpaid income tax during the period under dispute.

    Rule 51.7 says there is a requirement to give advance notice of hearsay evidence and rule 51.11 says such evidence must be tested to determine whether the informant “has any motive to conceal or misrepresent matters”.

    The Revenue told the commissioners that records from the electoral roll proved beyond doubt that Mr Cullinane rented out rooms in his three-bedroom semi. Ten years later, after internal records were leaked, the Revenue said it had based its case on information from an unnamed informant. To this day, what this informant said has not been revealed.

    Mr Cullinane has signed affidavits from neighbours and relatives to say they never saw tenants at his house. Even the person who bought his former house from the trustees in bankruptcy signed a letter to say the second and third bedrooms were uninhabitable.

    At one point in the hearing Mr Cullinane was asked to leave the room while Revenue officials remained, in breach of legal rules. There are other breaches that Mr Cullinane alleges prevented him obtaining a fair trial at the commissioners’ hearing and in later court appearances. The Revenue has consistently argued that it asked his accountant to fill in gaps in his employment record and “no satisfactory explanation was forthcoming”.

    A spokesman says: “Mr Cullinane was asked to make returns for the relevant years and/or explain what he was doing in the gaps. He did not do so to the satisfaction of the General Commissioners.”

    Mr Cullinane disputes this statement, and says it fails to answer the allegation that the commissioners didn’t have all the facts before them. Without an independent ombudsman or taxpayers’ bill of rights, Mr Cullinane will be forced to return to the courts.

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2005/jul/02/tax.jobsandmoney

  13. THE GUARDIAN

    This man was right all along

    Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports

    Phillip Inman
    @phillipinman

    Sat 10 May 2003 15.05 BST
    First published on Sat 10 May 2003 15.05 BST

    Patrick Cullinane’s life has been ruined by the Inland Revenue. The government department has bankrupted him, kicked him out of his home, and driven him to a mental breakdown. His brothers and sisters have walked away from him and he has been unable to find work.

    His crime? You might think he had committed a major white-collar tax fraud or an offshore scam depriving the Revenue of millions. But Mr Cullinane was simply an ordinary working man, earning around £18,000 a year in the 1980s largely as a casual in the film industry.

    Yet he became the victim of an Inland Revenue strategy to hunt down so-called “ghosts” in the film industry that the department believed were evading large amounts of tax. At one point the Revenue said Mr Cullinane owed £68,000 in unpaid tax.

    But what makes Mr Cullinane’s case truly extraordinary is the revelations contained in confidential Inland Revenue documents now in the possession of Jobs & Money.

    The documents show:

    · During the period that Mr Cullinane was supposed to be evading tax he was on “emergency” PAYE, paying more tax than he really owed. Yet these Revenue records were some how missed or ignored by the department’s investigators.

    · A Revenue assessment of his undeclared rental income was partly based on information from “an informant” and a list of former tenants of Mr Cullinane. The documents now reveal that the former “tenants” were really the previous owners of the property and unconnected to Mr Cullinane. Mr Cullinane has insisted throughout that he never earned rental income.

    · The Revenue’s estimate for his undeclared rental income was £162,500 over eight years, or £1,700 a month. But this was for two rooms in a partly derelict semi in an unlovely part of north London in the 1980s. Local lettings agents describe the estimates as laughably high.

    · Crucially, the documents reveal that a Revenue investigator himself believed that the department’s estimate was too high.

    “As regards the lettings assessments,” he says, “[they] are indefensibly high when viewed against the broader background. Even if the commissioners do display an enthusiasm to determine appeals in a positive sum, I would hesitate to encourage anything above three figures. In essence, I simply want to dispose of the appeals. I would not be unduly distressed to hear that all years had been discharged.” That takes the assessment from £162,500 to zero. The commissioners, who referee tax cases, never saw this memo and at a subsequent meeting accepted the Revenue’s estimates allowing inspectors, who knew Mr Cullinane was broke, to prosecute the bankruptcy.

    In the following years the Revenue persisted with his case, sending bailiffs and the police to repossess his house. After they sold it for £125,000 the Revenue took £18,000, other government departments helped themselves and accountants KPMG, appointed by the Revenue to look into the case, were paid £32,000. Mr Cullinane himself was left with nothing.

    Mr Cullinane believes he was the victim of the Revenue’s desire to obtain a “scalp” in its investigations into tax abuse in the film industry. But he is also a victim of tax legislation whereby the Revenue can assume all taxpayers are guilty until proven innocent. The problem is that a court case in 1995, two years after he was found guilty of non-payment of tax, re-established this principle and also that it is the taxpayer’s job to provide information for an assessment, not the Revenue’s.

    Inspectors can estimate income and call it an “assessment” of your earnings. The Revenue built up a case against Mr Cullinane even though he was supplying them with as much information as he could about when he worked, claimed benefit and went on holiday.

    Now, after a four-year investigation by Jobs & Money, his case has been laid bare. More than 200 pages of documents sent to him last month by the Revenue, combined with leaked documents posted, he assumes, by whistle-blowing tax staff, reveal that he was, in his words, “fitted up”.

    Memos from inspectors tell how Mr Cullinane had been identified by a newly created Film Industry Unit as their first investigation, and one they didn’t want to let go. He worked during the 1980s mainly for Warner Bros. From the mid 1980s, the Inland Revenue unit was pursuing the so-called “ghosts” in the film business – people who drifted in and out of work and were paid mainly in cash.

    Mr Cullinane’s case is so disturbing that this week Barry Gardiner, the MP for Brent North, says he will be calling for an adjournment debate in the House of Commons questioning the “governance” of the Inland Revenue and its ability to investigate complaints made by taxpayers.

    Mr Gardiner has already written a detailed letter to the chairman of the Revenue, Sir Nicholas Montagu, setting out all the inconsistencies in the case. The reply stated that all issues related to Mr Cullinane’s case have been dealt with in court. It refused to deal with the five specific points raised by the MP.

    But Mr Gardiner says the most disturbing aspect of the case is the assessment for lettings income. Internal correspondence shows it was based on information from someone variously called a “source” or “informant”. Inspectors also said they had a list of residents, taken partly from the electoral roll, that substantiated their assessment. But the memos and leaked information now in Mr Cullinane’s possession show the only two names on the list of occupants were the previous owners. The informant, says the Revenue, passed on details about tenants. Inspectors accepted the information as reliable. This informant has never been forced to reveal him or herself, as would happen in a court of law.

    A spokesman for the Revenue denies its investigations were based solely on the informant. “In addition to the informer’s information we had unexplained money into the bank accounts during the period; failure to make tax returns or provide accounts as he was required to do; Mr Cullinane’s own admission (made after strenuous denials) that he had let his property for some periods. Also no accounts/returns were made.”

    Mr Cullinane denies that he let rooms to anyone at any time, and denies he ever made a confession to Revenue officials that he did. He says the payments in his bank account that are “unexplained” have been explained by his accountant and are only a tiny fraction of the Revenue’s rental income figures.

    One might expect to find evidence of a champagne lifestyle from Mr Cullinane’s supposed lavish earnings. Yet there is no such evidence offered by the Revenue. MP Barry Gardiner, who has also been following the Cullinane case for many years, concludes: “What these memos appear to substantiate is what we have believed all along. This has been a terrible miscarriage of justice.”

    Twenty years war with the Revenue

    1982 Patrick Cullinane starts working at Elstree Studios as a stage hand for Warner Bros. He is put on emergency PAYE tax rate. Asks for a rebate, but is denied.

    1983 Warner shifts entire workforce to PAYE. Mr Cullinane continues to be taxed on emergency rate. Asks for rebate but is rejected.

    1986 Employs an accountant to pursue rebate. Revenue agrees to put him on basic tax, but refuses rebate.

    1987 Without his knowledge, he becomes target of first investigation by the Revenue’s new Film Industry Unit. Revenue demands unpaid tax of £500.

    1988-1991 Revenue demands escalate and Mr Cullinane becomes unemployed. He does not work again in the 1990s.

    1992 Revenue inspectors estimate Cullinane’s unpaid tax bill as £68,000, based on an estimate of £17,500 a year rental income over seven years from two spare rooms in his home, plus £90,000 from self-employed income from 1984-1988. Mr Cullinane is not allowed to see documents.

    1996 Revenue obtains bankruptcy order against Mr Cullinane.

    1998 Mr Cullinane’s house is repossessed after bailiffs and police kick down his door.

    1999 His house is sold for £125,000. The Revenue takes £18,000 while accountants KMPG, employed by the Revenue to look after Mr Cullinane’s assets, take £32,000. The Secretary of State takes £10,000, the mortgage lender takes back its £26,000, agents and valuers take £9,000, VAT is £10,000 and so on. Mr Cullinane is left with nothing.

    2000 Mr Cullinane begins court action to obtain his tax documents from the Revenue, but loses. The Revenue says it is under no obligation to reveal internal documents to prove case, and four judges agree.

    2003 In February the Revenue writes to Mr Cullinane saying it will now release “copies of our investigation folder”. In March he receives 200 pages of internal documents, which indicate that tax bills against Mr Cullinane were based on flimsy information or, in most cases, no information at all. Revenue denies wrongdoing.

    Tax

    Scams
    Income tax

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2003/may/10/tax.scamsandfraud

    PATRICK CULLIANE BECAME A LEADING CAMPAIGNER AND CASEWORKER IN THE FIGHT AGAINST INSTITUTIONALISED CORRUPTION, AND FOR JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE.

    THERE WAS NOT A CORRUPT JUDGE THAT HE WAS NOT AWARE OF.

  14. Dr David Staples. Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE),
    The governing body of Freemasonry in England, Wales, the Isle of Man.

    Dr David Staples can be contacted by:
    Emailing: info@ugle.org.uk or by emailing his secretary cmenditta@ugle.org.uk
    or writing to Dr David Staples 60 Great Queen St, Holborn, London WC2B 5AZ

    COURT OF APPEAL HAS STILL NOT RECEIVED THE RE-TRANSFERRING ORDER

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?

    BARRISTER MR DAY: It does.

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    BARRISTER MR DAY: Yes

  15. International Child Abductions Slovak Embassy Round Table On Child Protection
    – Full List Of Participants

    Ms Helene Clift

    Legal Director UK, ICACU

    International Child Abduction and Contact Unit, Office of the Official Solicitor (ICACU)

  16. 18th May 2020

    Since these videos were made, Austria has decided that the perfectly sane intellectual, Peter Hofschroer, is to be incarcerated for the rest of his life. This ARTIBRARY DETENTION FOR LIFE judicial decision has been made on the basis of fraudulent psychiatric reports. PETER HOFSCHROER HAS NEVER BEEN EXAMINED BY A PSYCHIATRIST IN AUSTRIA.

    By all international standards in law, this is outright corruption and fraud on the court.

    The perpetrator, Professor Dr. Manfred Walzl is a so-called court witness who is not registered as such with the governing medical body for court witnesses. He was paid 116.20 Euros for each of two false psychiatric reports.

  19. Had my hearing in August 2018 with Oliver as a presiding judge. He is as racist as racist can be with the disgusting and obscene remarks he made against me and my children. He referred to my son as ‘horse nostril’ I have never heard of this term before but I think he was referring to the shape of an African Caribbeans nose. made a complaint to the judicial conduct investigations office and received a response in November 2018 that I was lying. They also said recordings cannot be obtained. Sounds like a continuous pattern of unacceptable behaviour going on

  20. I am so sorry you had to experience that. It’s not as if you weren’t having enough problems by the fact that you were in court in the first place. Everyone has said that he is a nasty bully. It seems that he cannot have any common decency, much less a judicial code of ethics.

  22. Contact the Ministry of Justice

    You’re contacting the Ministry of Justice about Judicial Corruption

    The following information may help:

    Overseas Business Risk – Dominican Republic
    The British Embassy Santo Domingo invites project proposals for 2016 Bilateral Programme Fund.
    Bereavement information – Philippines: murder, manslaughter and suspicious deaths
    More results

    Do you still need to contact the Ministry of Justice
    Yes
    No

    (That about sums it up, doesn’t it?)

    See for yourself https://contact-moj.service.justice.gov.uk/correspondence/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&correspondence%5Btopic%5D=Judicial+Corruption&commit=Continue

    See all the choices you could have had from the Ministry when seeking contacting it about Judicial Corrupton:

    https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=Judicial+Corruption&order=relevance

    What a laugh, try the website out for yourselves. The things they don’t want you to know about won’t be on there. No doubt they paid some professional idiot contractors a lot of money for this.

    Contact the Ministry of Justice? They don’t want you to. They delete nearly all the emails you send them. By doing it this way, you will not have a record of what you sent to them. THIS IS THE IDEA BEHIND IT. They simply don’t want to deal with the public.

  23. It is disgraceful that the Ministry of Justice posts such completely OUT OF DATE information, and creates such a useless webpage.

    Look at this one. Some of these people are no longer even around!

    What a shoddy service. Tell your MP (on the off chance that you may have one that is not compromised and might actually do something for you).

    Home

    Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption: members

    Cabinet Office

    Policy paper
    Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption: members

    Published 29 July 2015

    The Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption oversees the government’s work to tackle corruption domestically and internationally.

    Membership

    UK Government Anti-Corruption Champion – The Rt Hon Sir Eric Pickles MP (co-chair)
    Minister of State, Home Office – The Rt Hon Mike Penning MP (co-chair)
    Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office – The Rt Hon Hugo Swire MP
    Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills – The Rt Hon Anna Soubry MP
    Minister of State, Department for International Development – The Rt Hon Desmond Swayne TD MP
    Economic Secretary to the Treasury – Harriet Baldwin MP
    Solicitor General – Robert Buckland QC MP
    Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice – Dominic Raab MP
    Director of Public Prosecutions – Alison Saunders
    Director, Serious Fraud Office – David Green CB QC
    Director-General, National Crime Agency – Keith Bristow
    Commissioner, Metropolitan Police – Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe
    Commissioner, City of London Police – Adrian Leppard

    Other ministers and officials will be invited as and when required.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inter-ministerial-group-on-anti-corruption-members/inter-ministerial-group-on-anti-corruption-members

  24. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LAWYERS BEHAVING BADLY

    The barristers below all held Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, issued by psychiatrists
    to protect me, following my exposure to Toxic Aircraft Cabin Fumes that contained neurotoxins
    including organophosphates.

    Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Jermy Royds wrote: Leonard Lawrence interests must be protected.

    However, rather than protect me and register the Court of Protection Medical Certificate with
    the Court of Protection the lawyers went on a revenue gathering exercise for themselves.

    THE BARRISTERS NAMES ARE BELOW:

    The first Court of Protection Medical Certificate was held by barrister Dominic BRAZIL in 2004.
    The third & fourth Court of Protection Medical Certificate was held by barrister Nicholas Allen.
    The first, third and fourth Court of Protection Medical Certificate held by Caroline Wilbourne.

    Barrister Dominic Brazil
    1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, Temple, London EC4Y 7DB
    clerks@1kbw.co.uk

    Barrister, now Recorder Nicholas Allen QC
    29 Bedford Row Chambers, Holborn, London WC1R 4HE
    clerks@29br.co.uk

    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne Temple, London, EC4Y 9BJ
    clerks@1gc.com

    WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

    Barrister Dominic Brazil
    Stephens Road Chambers 84 Stephens Rd TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne
    1 Garden Court Chambers 57-60 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Holborn, London WC2A 3LJ,
    clerks@1gc.com

    Recorder Nicholas Allen QC St. Ives Chambers, 1-3 Whittall St, Birmingham B4 6DH,
    Door tenant since February 2018.
    familyclerks@stiveschambers.co.uk

    Leonard Lawrence

  25. I wonder when the above committee is going to start work on domestic corruption? They could start with the allegations made on this website. But will they? They have never tackled domestic corruption in their lives. The whole system is corrupt and it was set up deliberately to allow for the type of crime and legal racketeering you see described on this website.

    There is no proper auditing and oversight of judicial decisions and court process. This must change, and we cannot have the corrupt overseeing the corrupt.

    None of these cases are unusual. People have been fighting for justice for decades at least. Even Dickens knew about the corruption in the legal system.

    It’s a wonder that Eric Pickles (the first ‘anti-corruption tsar’) doesn’t still have his name on this outdated list.

    HE DID NOTHING EITHER.

  26. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    On the 8 February 2006 Consultant Psychiatrist Wing Commander Professor
    Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych RAF Rtd wrote a medical report about myself
    to the Royal Courts of Justice London. The report cannot be disclosed and was
    destroyed by the Ministry of Justice around 2013.

    The report is marked as follows:

    LEONARD MICHAEL LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST
    NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Mr. Justice, now Lord Justice Adrian FULFORD has never explained why he upheld
    a decision in January 2013 by Master Basil Yoxall, in the Queens Bench Division,
    not to disclose Wing Commander Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych
    medical report to the following: Family Division, Court of Protection and the Court
    of Appeal when Mrs. Justice Pauffley, had instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer
    my case to the Court of Appeal and His Honour Judge Philip Waller CBE had instructed
    that all files be sent to the Court of Protection and an Appeal filed.

    Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych files and those files held by Lord Justice
    Adrian FULFORD in 2013 have been recovered for me. Photos of these files were
    shown to the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC on the 13 October 2018. The files contained
    Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s and one CP2.

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

  27. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LEONARD MICHAEL LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST
    NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Following Mr. Justice, now Lord Justice Adrian FULFORD, court order in February
    2013 upholding Master Basil Yoxall order not to disclose Professor Gordon Turnbull
    FRCP FRCPsych Court of Protection Medical Report CP2 to the Family Division, Court
    of Protection and the Court of Appeal, in June 2013 the Crown Prosecution Service
    request Thames Valley Police to visit me.

    The request was assigned to Devon and Cornwall Police. Over 7 years later and PC Emma
    Pack (now Sgt Emma Story-Barrett) Devon and Cornwall Police has still to visit me.

    An entry in Devon and Cornwall Police Log falsy alleges that PC Emma Pack attended
    my home. Chief Superintendent Claire Armes, now with Avon and Somerset Police,
    may care to explain why PC Emma Pack misconduct was neutralized given that Claire
    Armes had reviewed PC Emma Pack conduct when a Detective Superintendent at
    Devon and Cornwall Police.

    Leonard Lawrence

  28. I’m still speechless that the ministry of justice used taxpayers money to take a litigant in person to court where the outcome was already predetermined and the case was heard by justice Julian Knowles with a prearranged judgement which was uploaded by matrix chambers on their website 12 days before the order was handed down by justice Julian Knowles. My question is quite simple, why on earth would the ministry of justice use so much money in this litigation when they already had the outcome they wanted which was granted to them from the very beginning? The taxpayer has been duped with fraudulent activity which then progressed with fabricated media articles. It looks as though matrix chambers has made a lot of money (six-figure sums) for doing nothing! I hope that paedophile judge Simon Oliver is worth all this money

  29. Is this child abductor of a judge still working as a judge or is he suspended from duty? It would be inappropriate for him to hear cases with allegations over allegations made against him online! If he is hearing cases, our argument is with the government who have failed us in order to protect the VIP paedophile rings

  30. Dear all
    I remember some people have commented on this site talking about how the Ministry of Justice spent £50,000 in the High court litigation against me for Simon Oliver’s benefit. However, what everyone else does not know is that more money has been spent in protecting Simon Oliver by the Ministry of Justice. In Simon Oliver’s witness statement against me in the High court, he said that Thames Valley Police has put in a special alarm at his home with a 5-minute response time which involves him pressing a panic button. This was funded by the taxpayer. This alarm system was upgraded by the Ministry of Justice in 2017 to make it even more sophisticated. This was once again funded by the taxpayer. The amount of money that the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police have put into protect Simon Oliver has gone into the hundreds of thousands of pounds! If that was not enough, they even have spent money funding a flat for him in Waterloo so he does not have to go home. It would be nice if they spend this money on the NHS or even on disciplinary action against him. Is there anyway someone can go back to Government and ask them who financed all of this money for Simon Oliver and his protection. I don’t think it’s the Berkshire Freemasons because their funding is very limited. It sickens me to think that over £200,000 has been spent in protecting Simon Oliver to date. Oh and yes the judgement was prearranged as well because Matrix chambers had a copy of the finalised approved judgement which they uploaded on their website 12 days before it was handed down by the High court. The cheek that the Government Legal Department had to ask me for £40,000 costs to give to Simon Oliver when in fact, he never paid for the litigation himself in the first place! This is fraudulent activity where money was going to get stolen from me! I never paid any money to them and said to them that they can pursue me. To date, they have not asked me for the money ever again. This is because everything I said back to them about this dodgy litigation was correct. Didn’t Mr Lawrence go through enough by having his assets stolen by Simon Oliver using similar strategies!
    Kindest regards.

  31. Jack Straw scraps rule saying judges must declare if they are masons

    The justice secretary is scrapping a rule about freemasonry declarations that he played a role in introducing 12 years ago
    Andrew Sparrow
    @AndrewSparrow
    Thu 5 Nov 2009 17.30 GMT

    The government introduced the declaration rule after it was recommended by the Commons home affairs committee in a report published in March 1997. The committee said that “nothing so much undermines public confidence in public institutions as the knowledge that some public servants are members of a secret society one of whose aims is mutual self-advancement”. At the time Straw said Labour supported the recommendation.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2009/nov/05/jack-straw-judges-masons

  32. J Shaikh says:
    May 27, 2020 at 11:47 pm ear all

    Dear Mr. Shaikh

    Re: Ministry of Justice spent £50,000 in the High court litigation against you
    for Simon Oliver’s benefit.

    In my case, the costs to the Government has exceeded £500,000 (half a million).
    Including 10 years of costs of neurorehabilitation, following my organophosphate
    poisoning.

    Had HHJ Simon Oliver complied with Mrs. Justice Puffley instructions in February
    2013 all of these costs could have been recovered from barrister Dominic BRAZIL,
    solicitor Graeme S. FRASER and BP Collins Solicitors for failing to disclose my
    protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence

  33. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION (HIGH COSTS, SPECIAL CASES UNIT)
    RE; LEONARD LAWRENCE
    THE CASE POSES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED BY THE COURT

    The above question was answered on the 20 March 2012 by solicitor May Maughan,
    Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts. Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of
    the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts made all clinical and financial decision on
    Leonard Lawrence by not disclosing the Court of Protection Medical Certificates that
    she held to any court !!!!!

    The following barrister’s Chambers, financed by the Legal Services Commission
    were briefed on Leonard Lawrences’s case by Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors:

    Hardwicke Chambers
    Hardwicke Bldg, New Square, Holborn, London WC2A 3SB, United Kingdom
    Barrister Barbara Hewson (specializes Court of Protection work)

    St John’s Chambers Bristol
    101 Victoria St, Redcliffe, Avon, Bristol BS1 6PU, United Kingdom
    Barrister Vanessa McKinlay Clinical Negligence
    Barrister Jody Atkinson

    St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    55 Temple Row, Birmingham B2 5LS, United Kingdom

    HOW COULD SOLICITOR PAUL HICKS AND SOLICITOR MARGARITA TYNE HAVE BRIEFED
    THE ABOVE CHAMBERS PRIOR TO OBTAINING LEONARD LAWRENCE’S CASE FILES FROM
    THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ON THE 20 MARCH 2012. ONE MONTH PRIOR
    TO THE HEARING BEFORE HHJ SIMON OLIVER ON THE 16 APRIL 2012?

  34. Dear All
    We have now created our tik tok page under judge Simon Oliver’s name. This will make our campaign go even more international! Please take a look at our tik tok page and view the video that we have created so far. Please feel free to comment and ask others to comment on it as well.

    https://vm.tiktok.com/KmbLSg/

    https://vm.tiktok.com/KmvPAj/

    From all of us at judges behaving badly

  35. Stephanie Hack Head of The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office

    Joshua Rozenberg:
    We need to be more open about punishing badly-behaved judges

    http://www.legalcheek.com › lc-journal-posts › joshua-rozen…
    Nov 23, 2017 – Its joint heads, Stephanie Hack and Joanna Otterburn,
    currently run the JCIO on a job-share.

  36. Joshua Rozenberg: We need to be more open about …
    http://www.legalcheek.com › lc-journal-posts › joshua-rozen…
    Nov 23, 2017 – The current law, in section 11(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981,
    is to the … Its joint heads, Stephanie Hack and Joanna Otterburn, currently run
    the … Of 2,078 complaints finalised during the year 2016/17, a total of 42 were upheld. …

    It’s the job of the JCIO to sift incoming complaints. … Nov 23 2017 9:42am.

  37. Subject: Re: THE DOCTRINE OF WILFUL BLINDNESS: BRITAIN’S RULE OF LAW /
    Freemasonry – W.Bro***

    Dear all,

    I am a freemason, I would know a thing or two about this.

    Having spent the last 3+ years in covert operations investigating judicial and police
    corruption after having fallen foul myself to the cesspool of corruption known as the
    UK justice system, our masonic craft is being used intensively by the taxpayer sponsored
    state terrorists as a tool of the trade. I say as follows:

    The Law Society is one of the most masonic institutions in the world. Lawyers are all
    actively encouraged to become freemasons. Freemasonry is enshrined in all the four
    Inns of Court. In the middle of the 12th century, the military Order of the Knights
    Templar built the round church by the Thames which became known as the Temple
    Church. Circa 200 years later, after the abolition of the Order in 1312, lawyers occupied
    the Temple site and buildings. They formed themselves into two societies, the Inner
    Temple and Middle Temple. The entire legal profession in the UK was effectively
    founded upon freemasonry.

    The term “masonic firm” is used widely in the UK legal profession. This is because
    there is a preponderance of firms and chambers that are operated exclusively by
    brethren. It refers to those firms of solicitors and barrister’s chambers whose senior
    partners are, without exception and as part of a policy, freemasons, fellow brethren.

    In those firms, most of the partners will be “on the xxxxxx”. Some masonic firms
    will not allow non-masonic partners. Masonic code is used most frequently both by
    members of the Bar and the compromised judiciary and these codes are used to obtain
    preferential treatment and to communicate in code during proceedings.

    W.Bro***

  38. Perhaps the hand signals used by Simon Oliver with his cohorts in the court room are Masonic hand signals?

  39. Len

    To coin a phrase re Simon Oliver…….’you’ve got him by the balls’!

    Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself
    by ruining the lives of others against all Masonic and ethical principles.

    Indeed if you read the Charge after initiation, every Mason has a personal responsibility
    to behave in a manner which is ‘useful to mankind and become an ornament to the society’
    Simon Oliver is a crook and there is nothing honourable about him……that is why I refuse
    to refer to him by his title.

    All the best

  40. Leonard

    Freemasons……

    The one that springs to mind immediately is Kenneth Noye…..the M25 murderer.

    Simon Oliver, I am horrified to learn more and more bad things about him.

    What he did to you is immoral and unethical and it offends every sense of decency
    within me. If his Lodge are aware of his underhand dealings they will likewise be
    shocked and truly saddened by his dreadful behaviour.

    He needs a criminal record to be sacked from his Lodge ……at least that is my
    understanding. I don’t think you can join a Lodge if you have a criminal record
    and an individual would need a dispensation from Grand Lodge in order to meet
    entry requirements. I know of two individuals with such dispensations for minor
    misdemeanours when they were teenagers.

    I belong to ….Lodge. My loyalty is to you in this instance and I want to be completely
    honest and transparent with you. I care about you being safe and feeling safe and
    fighting for the justice that you so richly deserve.

    I am shocked by the response (or lack of response) that you have had from the Grand
    Secretary David Staples……I would have expected far more support and engagement
    from him.

  41. Any inaction from McFarlane, Burnett, Heaton, and Buckland (and there appears to have been no action) is a clear indication that they are involved and that Oliver’s activities are either state sanctioned or the whole crew is involved in criminal racketeering and/or are compromised in some way, wouldn’t you say?

  42. From Leonard Lawrence
    Dear Anonymous

    Anonymous says:
    June 3, 2020 at 2:01 pm

    Any inaction from McFarlane, Burnett, Heaton, and Buckland (and there appears to have been no action)
    is a clear indication that they are involved and that Oliver’s activities are either state-sanctioned or the
    whole crew is involved in criminal racketeering and/or are compromised in some way, wouldn’t you say?

    Lord Burnett [Lord Chief Justice Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales].
    Sir Andrew McFarlane [President of the Family Division and Court of Protection].
    Sir Richard Heaton [Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice].
    Robert Buckland QC [Lord Chancellor, and Secretary of State for Justice].

    Officers have visited me, they were not police officers or National Crime Agency Officers.
    Their occupation was Government Service.

    They wanted to view the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that enable the solicitor
    Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts to hold me in a comatose
    state for 18 months, without access to the Court of Protection.

    The officers knew details about myself and a great deal about HHJ Simon Oliver. I was given
    instructions to follow, that I complied with. The Court of Protection, Medical Certificate,
    issued by Dr. Jeremy Royds, Cygnet Healthcare on the 27 January 2005 (without a medical)
    was sent to a Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames
    Valley Police for confirmation as to the authenticity of the Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificate.

    Almost 10 months later, there has been no response from Chief Constable John Campell
    and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg.

    Sir Richard Heaton [Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice] could assist me by
    naming the person within the Ministry of Justice that authorised the litigation cost in the
    case HHJ Simon Oliver v Javed Shaikh. HHJ Simon Oliver falsely accused me in his statement
    of making two specific comments on this website.

    The officer (ex-Government Service) that drove me to the meeting with the Attorney
    General was present at my home at the time and date HHJ Simon Oliver alleges that I made
    the post on this website.

    I suggest that HHJ Simon Olivers knows exactly who made the comments. HHJ Oliver, you
    removed a 14 year old from her home and sent her to a children’s home. The teenager ran
    away. In August 2017 Thames Valley Police conducted a major search.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Olivers’ I have no need to go to your home.

    Members associated with Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Olivers Masonic Lodge
    ‘The Berkshire Masters’ Lodge No 3684′ Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road,
    Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA, United Kingdom have spoken and have visited me.

    Leonard Lawrence

  43. FTAO Anthony Stansfeld
    Police and Crime Commissioner for the Thames Valley,

    THAMES VALLEY POLICE
    RE: LEONARD LAWRENCE
    FILE RECEIVED BACK FROM CPS (CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE)
    YESTERDAY-REVIEWED: NEED TO SET UP APPOINTMENT TO DISCUSS…
    THAT THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.

    Almost 15 years later and Thames Valley Police have still to set up the appointment!

    Leonard Lawrence

  44. Len, would you say that Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police are relatively honest?

  45. Hi
    It’s been all over the news today that the Madeleine McCann abductor has been found. I’m just wondering whether Simon Oliver has anything to do with it because he’s also a child abductor and I believe he was around that area at that very time claiming his gift but I guess it could be a possibility that it’s not him because his preference is young boys

  46. It probably was him all along. It explains why the government in the UK has been financing it so much to protect him. It’s just that some poor man who is already in a German prison has been selected to take the fall for it to keep the public quiet. But in all seriousness, the reason why the Madeleine McCann case is so significant is because Gordon Brown raped a 9-year-old girl back when he was in university and it is alleged that Madeleine McCann was selected by a gang in retaliation to what Gordon Brown did. The nine-year-old girl that Gordon Brown raped was the daughter of a prostitute who Gordon Brown paid money to. The 9-year old girl was raped by Gordon Brown and a group of other men that he was with at the time. This is why the UK government has been financing all of this money for all these years to find the perpetrator because they are trying to keep their dirty little secrets behind closed doors. It was the same Government Legal Department and Simon Oliver with the assistance and protection from the Ministry of Justice that falsely accused Mr Sheikh of plotting an anthrax attack! What a shame

  47. Anonymous says:
    June 3, 2020, at 11:41 pm
    Len, would you say that Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police are relatively honest?

    Dear Anonymous,

    Relatively honest?

    Stephen Hayes kindly sent me two signed books free of charge.

    THE BIGGEST GANG IN BRITTAIN ISBN-13: 978-1781486061
    (To Leonard enjoy the read)

    FIFTY SHADES OF BLACK AND BLUE ISBN-13: 978-1781488355
    (To Leonard. Maybe? memories.)

    Stephen also wrote another book:

    TOP SECRETS ISBN-13: 978-1781483398

    Stephen Hayes highlights many cases of injustice, including the two below:

    1. Colin Stagg was formally acquittal in September 1994 of Rachel Nickell’s murder
    2. The case of Stefan Kiszcko and one of THE BIGGEST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE.
    ‘The worst miscarriage of all time’ – how a botched West …

    —————————————————————-
    FIFTY SHADES OF BLACK AND BLUE (To Leonard Maybe? memories.)

    YES STEPHEN!

    A Chief Inspector with the Royalty and Diplomatic Protection Group was giving evidence
    against me. When swearing an oath to the court the Chief Inspector gave a Masonic vocal
    signal to the court. The judge immediately informed the jury of what had occurred.

    Not all Freemasons in judicial and police service behave like HHJ Simon Oliver.

    Leonard Lawrence

  48. There appears to be a link missing with reference to Britain’s “relatively honest police”

  49. COULD SOMEONE ASSIST ME BY IDENTIFYING THE DATE THAT DETECTIVE CHIEF
    SUPERINTENDENT TIM DE MEYER CEASED TO BE THE HEAD OF PROFESSIONAL
    STANDARDS AT THAMES VALLEY POLICE ?

    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine was appointed Head of Professional
    Standards Department, in April 2019
    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence

    ————————————————————————-
    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 02 June 2020 16:00

    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine
    Head of Professional Standards
    Thames Valley Police

    Dear Detective Chief Superintendent Paine,

    Ref: Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer – Crime and Criminal Justice.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer took over the role of Head of Thames
    Valley Police Professional Standards Department from Detective Chief Superintendent
    Nikki Ross on 6th January 2014.

    Could you please advise me of the date Detective Chief Superintendent (now Assistant
    Chief Constable Tim De Meyer) ceased in that position as Head of Thames Valley Police
    Professional Standards Department?

    Thank you for your assistance

    Leonard Lawrence

  50. Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine
    Head of Professional Standards
    Thames Valley Police

    Dear Detective Chief Superintendent Paine,

    On the 3 February 2016, I received a letter from Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell,
    when Head of the Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police, alleging that an
    internal review of my case found that there was no evidence to open an investigation.

    THIS IS NOW KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN UNTRUE

    The Independent Police Complaints Commission/ Independent Office for Police Conduct
    documents that have been posted to me identify that Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell
    was receiving instructions from one or more senior Thames Valley Police officers.

    Could you please identify the Head of Professional Standards, Thames Valley Police, for
    the years 2015 and 2016.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    ———————————————————————-
    Economic Crime Conference 2019
    26 Nov -27 Nov 2019 The Crowne Plaza Hotel, Stratford-upon-Avon

    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations,
    City of London Police

    Biography

    Gavin Tyrrell is a police officer leading the City of London and National Lead Force
    Fraud Operations. His portfolio covers Complex Economic Crime investigations,
    Money Laundering, Bribery and Corruption, Asset Recovery as well as proactive
    operations.

    Gavin began his service with Thames Valley Police working largely in covert policing
    roles fighting organised crime before becoming head of economic and cybercrime in
    2011.

    Transferring to the City of London Police Gavin and his teams now also support complex
    investigation across the United Kingdom to enhance local capability and service delivery.

    Experienced working across Europe, US and Africa, Gavin is the United Kingdom’ economic
    crime representative to the European Union and has influenced recent policy amendments

  51. Great Revelations, keep at it. Stephen Hayes author The Biggest Gang in Britain trilogy, Amazon plus my videos on Stephen Hayes Grumpy on Facebook. Stay safe & keep at it.

  52. I am unable to view the post below on the JBB website ???

    ________________________________

  53. Do you have evidence of Judge Simon Oliver being a child abductor? If you don’t, then you need to be very careful about making statements like this.

  54. Was Gordon Brown charged and convicted? What is the source of your information?

  57. Systemic corruption – The fact is that the UK is systemically corrupt

    Unless you or someone you know has been affected, you may not even know that the UK is systemically corrupt, some may not even know what we are talking about when we say systemic corruption. What we are referring to is grand corruption, endemic and culturally accepted dishonesty, out of control civil servants and corrupt practices rife throughout the police, the Attorney General’s Office, the Serious Fraud Office, the Ministry of Justice, HMCTS, the judiciary and the courts themselves through to the Law Society, BEIS and the Insolvency Service, Parliament, all of the regulatory authorities, national and the government quango offshoots.

    READ FULL ARTICLE HERE: http://www.intelligenceuk.com/sharenow.html

  58. “Historically, we have constructed corruption as something that is exclusively a problem in developing or economically ‘primitive’ societies, rather than our own. Yet the almost daily reporting of all manner of corruption cases in our most prominent and powerful institutions is beginning to unravel the idea that the British establishment is predicated on civilized values of ‘fairness’, ‘openness’ and ‘transparency’. A seemingly endless conveyor belt of cases has shown no signs of slowing down. Indeed, if anything, it has accelerated.”

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/harry-blain/how-corrupt-is-house-of-lords

  59. Mr. & Mrs. Musa were wrongly accused of a crime by social workers, and served time in prison. Their seven children were subsequently taken from them under these unlawful circumstances and adopted out. Their whole file needs a complete review. Their children need to be restored to them.

    Seven children were taken from just one family on false allegations of child abuse by London’s Haringey Council. The Musas served time in prison for a crime they did not commit, and were subsequently deported without their children.

    As you will see from the information, Haringey Council acted criminally in deceiving the judiciary, yet no attempt at returning the children to the parents has been made.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10946414/Judge-slams-Haringey-council-over-my-most-shocking-family-case-ever.html

    http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed129178

    http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/london-borough-of-haringey-v-musa-2014-ewhc-1341-fam?#.VckvcbtRGh1

    Justice has not been served for the Musas.

  60. Len
    Tell these pricks there is a clear distinction between a MISTAKE and FRAUD

  61. As you say – not mistakes but deliberate, planned deception – and perversion of justice at the highest level.….

  62. Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear Mr Jones,

    Re: Committal Proceedings.

    Committal Proceedings against Mr Javed Sheikh regarding the website:
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver judges behaving badly.

    I am advised that WBro HHJ Simon Oliver has requested the Ministry of Justice
    and Treasury Solicitors to instigated Committal Proceedings against Mr Javed
    Sheikh. I understand that Mr Javed Sheikh requests that I give evidence.

    Yours sincerely,
    Leonard Lawrence

    ———————————————————————-
    To: The Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry,
    The Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver,
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road,
    Sindlesham,
    Wokingham,
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Worshipful Brother Simon,

    Masonic Motto: Audi Vide Tace; Hear. See. Be Silent

    In the Committal Proceedings that you have actioned against Mr Javed Sheikh
    you have made two FALSE allegations against myself Leonard Lawrence, falsely
    alledging that I made posts on the website: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver Judges
    Behaving Badly, under the name of ‘FUCK OLIVER’.

    The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Freemasons’ Hall, Great Queen Street,
    London WC2B 5AZ

    Worshipful Brother Simon,
    In 2013 a meeting took place at The United Grand Lodge of England in London.
    Present was a Grand Officer and Provincial Grand Officers, Officers of Senior
    London Grand Rank, and London Grand Rank. The focus was on what Worshipful
    Brother HHJ Simon Oliver and two Government Agencies had done to me.

    On the 9 September 2010, Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk
    Chambers, London, wrote to advise me that barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench
    Walk, had admitted that I had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection when
    he, Dominic Brazil, had placed upon me Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in costs and
    inferences without informing the Court of Protection. Nineteen months prior to the
    hearing before Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver, at Reading County Court.

    What was not known at that time was that in February 2013 Worshipful Brother Simon,
    was instructed by Mrs Justice Pauffley to re-transfer my case SL09Do938 to the Civil
    Court of Appeal. Worshipful Brother Simon, you have still to make that order. Also,
    the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) having reviewed my case had requested Thames
    Valley Police to visit me. This they have still to action.

    Worshipful Brother Simon, you had conducted a Court of Protection hearing on the
    16 April 2012 and made a judgement on the 30 August 2012 when you did not hold
    a Court of Protection authorisation at that time! Secondly, the Senior District Judge
    Principal Registry of the Family Division (authorised Court of Protection Judge) had
    in September 2012 instructed that my files are sent to the Court of Protection and an
    appeal filed. Worshipful Brother Simon you did not comply with those instructions.

    The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) had loaned me monies to buy food, pay for
    heating and the care for an assistance dog. However, the bullying against me continued,
    so much that I was visited by number …. security district London. It then stopped.

    In 2016 the membership list of the Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 was sent to me.
    The now-former Provincial Grand Secretary, of Berkshire Freemason WBro David Keys,
    also a member of the Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 will tell you what happened.
    WBro David Keys will also explain why I no longer have a neurological Support Dog!

    Worshipful Brother Simon, what was puzzling in your written judgement dated the 30th
    August 2012 was the reference that I could not provide evidence that Reading County
    Court was advised in August 2005 that Laurence Oates (The Official Solicitor) had
    not agreed the sale of my home. The evidence was located at Reading County Court!
    I also suggest that you had it electronically on the 17 April 2012. That is why, according
    to solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP, you telephoned my barrister and warned
    him off. My barrister withdrew from my case.

    I was also told to pay £10,000 to barrister Dominic Brazil for a one hour hearing, when
    I was funded by the Special Cases Unit, Legal Services Commission.

    Worshipful Brother Simon,
    On the 18 August, 2005 barrister Simon Calhaem 29 Bedford Row Chambers, accompanied
    by Siobhan Baillie, instructed by Laurence Oates (The Official Solicitor) informed HHJ
    Charles Elly that Laurence Oates had not agreed the sale value of my home.

    Siobhan Baillie is now:
    Siobhan Baillie MP Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Ministry of Justice

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC MP when Attorney General for England and Wales was handed a
    copy of Siobhan Baillie notes, taken on the 18 August 2005. The now-former Freemason
    that drove me to the meeting has an association with the Ministry of Defence.

    Worshipful Brother Simon, with some encouragment from Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC MP
    two police forces have recently disclosed many many documents. Had both Police Forces
    disclosed the intelligence that they had obtained to the judiciary my case would have been
    concluded 10 years ago!

    One of the forces ‘Thames Valley Police’ in one year were found not to have recorded over
    35,000 offences including rape, sexual assaults, and domestic violence. The officers
    suppressing my case have been identified and can be named, starting with the now-former
    Detective Superintendent Gillian (Gill) Vannessa Wootton. Gill has a long history with me
    going back to 2004.

    There are even bigger fish within the Ministry of Justice and Government Legal Services.
    Unfortunately, the biggest two have died. Vanessa Davies (Director General) Bar Standards
    Board wrote to me following a meeting in London, advising that the Bar Standards Board
    had been misled by Alastair Pitblado the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts who had
    written to the Bar Standards Board advising that I had not been a Court of Protection
    patient, as Vanessa Davies writes in her letter to me, that is not true from the evidence
    now available.

    The above may explain why Sue Carr QC now The Right Honourable Lady Justice Carr, Lady
    Justice of Appeal and others did not participate in the Bar Standards Board review of my case.

    Last year two farmers came to see me, they bought me some apples and stayed for about
    30 minutes and left. Two weeks later they returned, they were not farmers. They had
    information about my former occupation and specific information on HHJ Simon Oliver.

    They wanted to view the Court of Protection Medical Certificates used to hold me for 18
    months whilst I was asset stripped. In less than 30 seconds they questioned why none
    of the Court of Protection Medical Certificates had the embossed seal of the Court of
    Protection on them.

    I was instructed to send a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, to Thames Valley Police
    to ascertain the authenticity of the certificate. Ten months later no reply!

    Masonic Motto: Audi Vide Tace; Hear. See. Be Silent

    Leonard Lawrence

    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  63. Len, I think you mentioned that Oliver had committed more acts of slander and libel against you.

    With the evidence that everyone has against him, I wonder if Oliver will exit the Old Bailey without handcuffs?

  64. It remains vitally important that we continue to modernise Freemasonry and to make it more accessible to modern man without trivialising its true values. By which I mean Respect, Integrity, Friendship and Charity.

    This Annual Meeting of Provincial Grand Lodge marks the start of the new masonic year and that inevitably brings change. In addition to welcoming all the incoming Acting Provincial Officers, I would like to thank all those who are standing down for the support and commitment that they have given during their term of office.

    This year marks the retirement of W Bro Terry Speight after four years as Provincial Grand Orator and I congratulate him on his preferment to Grand Rank in recognition of the esteem in which he is held. The role of Provincial Grand Orator has now changed and I have taken the opportunity of reconfiguring the appointment to incorporate that of the former non-collared Provincial Preceptor. I welcome W Bro Simon Oliver to this appointment.

    READ MORE https://www.berkspgl.org.uk/p/provincial-grand-masters-address-2019/

  65. Len,
    Congratulations on the new evidence; the date you received it now means you can forward
    it to Lisa Perkins with a letter before claim for judicial review of the decision, by TVP, not
    to investigate H H J Simon Oliver and the others for working with a common purpose to
    deprive you of your assets; outside a properly constituted Court of Protection; by using
    fake documentation.
    regards
    Argus

  66. Surely groups of public officials working in criminal joint enterprise(s) (common purpose) must AUTOMATICALLY carry a life sentence? However, Len’s is not the only case. Too bad they abolished hanging. Of course there may be some freemasons involved in this joint enterprise too ………..

  67. PUBLIC STATEMENT

    Due to recent events of which I have been made aware of via email, I have chosen to post here, as I know the legal team of HHJ Oliver monitor this site. I need them to read this and take serious note.
    I also want Ms. Louisa Lloyd-Jones (and Mr Javed Sheikh) to note, that in court it can be proven that Judge Oliver and his team are reading everything here, and they will certainly read this and will have no excuse to continue with at least 2 allegations made against Mr. Sheikh contributing to the grounds for the warrant they are seeking for his arrest.

    Facts ;

    HHJ Oliver recently made an application for the arrest and imprisonment of a Mr J Sheikh. The application was made by

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones. Senior Lawyer at Government Legal Department.

    The application includes a statement of ‘’facts’’ with allegations as to why HHJ Oliver and Lloyd Jones are asking that Sheikh be imprisoned.
    While I can not make comment on many of the allegations, I can however make a public statement as to at least two of those allegations being absolutely false.
    I vehemently oppose the fact Mr. Sheik is being accused of contempt of court on two counts which have nothing to do with him whatsoever;

    False allegations on court application prepared by Ministry of justice Lawyer Louisa Lloyd Jones and HHJ Simon Oliver;

    1/ that Mr. Sheikh is responsible for the Oliver Eight website.
    An absolutely false allegation which has been included as fact and as a stand-alone point of contempt of court, within court documents against Mr. Sheikh.
    ‘The Oliver eight’ website was set up by me and other colleagues as a platform to prepare to present Judicial victim allegations against HHJ Oliver with supporting DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Mr. Sheikh has absolutely no connection to TheOliverEight website and has absolutely zero influence over its content or in having it removed from the web.
    https://www.theolivereight.online/

    2/ Mr. Sheikh has also been falsely accused on another stand-alone point of contempt of court, as being responsible for the online ‘’Survey Hero HHJ Oliver questionnaire’’ for possible victims.
    https://surveyhero.com/c/0170b856

    The first paragraph of the survey web page states;

    ‘’This questionnaire has been created to support an investigation into abuse of power, errors of law, obstruction of Justice and possible unlawful and/or criminal activity by the British Judge, HHJ Simon Oliver.
    The questionnaire will be used to gather information from legitimate victims and witnesses.
    If you have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by HHJ Simon Oliver, which would stand up in a court of law, or before police enforcement, you will be invited to participate in a group preparing to formally challenge HHJ Oliver along with other victims in a class action.
    We were seeking at least 15 strong cases/victims, but due to the positive response may take more’’

    Apart from the fact this is not illegal or libelous, the false allegation included in the arrest application as fact, that Mr. Javed Sheikh is responsible for this online survey is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Mr. Sheikh has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Surveyhero Simon Oliver survey. It was set up in August 2019 to gather legitimate evidence from possible victims of HHJ Oliver for the evidence database being set up for the Oliver Eight website.
    I and my colleagues are not involved or ‘collude’ in anyway with Mr.Javed, although we have naturally taken an interest with his case , as with all those that feel they have been judicially abused by HHJ Oliver.
    Neither are we involved with this Blog its moderators (we do not even know who they are) and the same goes for any other platform on this topic, apart from the Oliver Eight and the survey hero page to support the Oliver Eight with an evidence database.

    I find it startling that senior Government attorney Louisa Lloyd-Jones is making two provably false allegations in the application to have Mr. Sheikh imprisoned. If a Judge and a senior Government attorney can make two glaringly false allegations against a member of the public to have them imprisoned, how many other allegations for the request for the arrest of Mr. Sheikh are false?
    This just absolutely proves how HHJ Oliver is prepared to nefariously make absolutely false allegations and statements about members of the public in court documents without any accountability. I have seen these false allegations and will swear before an ‘honest’ Judge that this is the case and is a total abuse of power and the law. It also proves extreme bullying by a heavy government attorney and a Judge who is starting to trip over his bloated sense of immunity to the law and accountability. Bear in mind it is we the public who is funding this TOTAL ABUSE OF POWER AND CORRUPTION OF THE LAW.

    I invite the Police to contact me at;
    Penelopesinclair9@gmail.com
    Where I am happy to make a formal police statement over the phone and in writing. I will only give information to a documented senior Police officer outside of the Thames Valley police catchment area, due to probable Thames Valley police collusion with HHJ Oliver.

    I also invite; Press, Government officials or pro bono human rights attorneys or similar to contact me at the same email address
    Penelopesinclair9@gmail.com

    Where I will give them evidence that Louisa Lloyd Jones of the UK Government legal department and HHJ Simon Oliver have made totally false allegations in an application for an innocent member of the public to be arrested and imprisoned with the sole attempt to silence that person.
    It’s time to stop this! And make Judge Simon Oliver accountable for his disgraceful behavior towards members of the public.

    Addendum

    While writing this statement this morning, I googled for some data and have found that there has already been a criminal complaint by someone who is also attempting to track down the IP address behind the Oliver eight site.

    🧇 Criminal Complaint – IPAddress.com
    http://www.ipaddress.com › search › criminal+complaint
    HHJ Simon Oliver, Home | Mysite. theolivereight.online. The Oliver Eight are requesting The Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Criminal Justice and Victims, ..
    And

    Criminal Complaint
    We have found the following websites that are related to Criminal Complaint.
    Websites

    • HHJ Simon Oliver, Home | Mysite
    theolivereight.online
    The Oliver Eight are requesting The Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Criminal Justice and Victims, to accept a cl*** action criminal complaint, leading to a legitimate and transparent investigation into grave, habitual misconduct, perversion of the course of justice and possible Judicial……………..’’

    I would like to know what the basis of such a criminal complaint is, who is behind that complaint and that person/s email me immediately at;
    penelopesinclair9@gmail.com

    It interesting to note the other sites being named in a criminal complaint alongside the Oliver eight;

    ‘’pro-seblog.com
    Empowering Ordinary People to Represent Themselves in Court Effectively’’
    And
    • Home | whistleblower, complaint, corruption, fraud, racism, theft
    tip-offs.com
    Whistle-blower, whistle blower, whistleblowing, fraud, corruption, theft, bribery, crime, criminal, tender fraud, crime, criminal, misconduct, dishonesty, ethics, risk…….”

    Which can only drive us to ask even more questions. Who are criminalizing those that seek to expose criminality?

    I suggest others (including the moderators of this blog) who have made websites or similar for which Mr. Sheikh is being blamed and threatened with imprisonment, do the right thing; step up and make your voice heard and available to Police to prove Mr. Sheikh should not be sent to jail for websites, blogs and events out of his control. It would be a total miscarriage not only of justice, but morality, if Mr. Sheikh is made a scapegoat for so many Oliver victims seeking help.

    Sincerely
    Penelope Sinclair
    Fiat justitia ruat caelum

    p.s. I do need to also state here that the Olivereight website and the HHJ Oliver Surveyhero questionnaire page have NOTHING to do with a blog which has plagiarized content from the OliverEight site and placed it here;

    https://misconductinpublicoffice.weebly.com/behaving-badly-blog/judge-simon-oliver-class-action-13-victims
    (Whoever did this, know it is NOT helpful and we are not in any way associated with them or this judges behaving badly blog.)

  68. Dear Penelope and Mr Sheikh
    Thank you very much for your comment above. We can also confirm that Mr Sheikh is not responsible for this blog either. Our material is gathered from several reliable sources which is evident from the comments here. Mr Sheikh has had no contribution to this site or has been involved in it in any way whatsoever. If ‘worshipful master’ Louisa Lloyd Jones or the Government Legal Services have a problem, please contact us directly on this blog and we will respond to you. If the police or any other government department wants to contact us, please comment and we will respond to you directly.
    NOTICE TO SIMON OLIVER: WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO DO IT. EVERYTIME YOU MISBEHAVE, WE WILL CREATE ADDITIONAL BLOGS AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT UNTIL YOU STOP VICTIMISING INNOCENT PEOPLE. YOUR TIME IS UP AND IT’S TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO STAND UP AGAINST YOU. EVEN YOUR FREEMASON LODGE DESPISE YOU AND NOW WANT YOU OUT.
    CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED.
    From the team at judges behaving badly

  71. Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Mr. Sheikh has posted to me (Leonard Lawrence) all papers sent to him by barrister
    Louisa Lloyd-Jones Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team
    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department
    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL

    HM Procurator General, with respect, the Treasury Solicitor omitted to inform me of
    the false allegations made against me by Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon
    Jonathan OLIVER, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG41 5EA.

    Upon receipt from barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones of the specific allegations Worshipful
    Master His Honour Judge Simon Jonathan OLIVER has made against me, the alligations
    will be investigated, addressed and defended.

    To assist barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones:
    a) [Posted by “len lawrence” at 10.30pm on 5 February 2018]
    b) [posted by “len lawrence” at 10.49pm on 10 February 2018]
    c) I understand that allegations have also been raised regarding my, and one others, mental
    health.

    HM Procurator General, I have disclosed to the former Attorney General the Rt Hon Geoffery
    Cox QC MP, documents that detectives from two police forces that visited me have identified
    as too sensitive for them to view. They are.

    Police files are marked: Disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.
    Our focus is on an Assistance Chief Constable within Thames Valley Police.

    HM Procurator General, barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones is not the lawyer driving this litigation
    by Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon. Louisa Lloyd-Jones is instructed by more
    senior lawyers who’s names can, if necessary, be identified.

    HM Procurator General, it appears that it is not the Government Legal Department that is
    driving this litigation against Mr. Javed Sheikh, it is the Ministry of Justice.

    HM Procurator General, would you enquire with the Permanent Secretary at the Ministry
    of Justice, Sir Richard Heaton, who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the litigation
    against Mr. Javed Sheikh, to whom I will then forward the evidence disproving the allegations
    Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon Jonathan OLIVER has made against me,

    HM Procurator General,
    I alone will take sole responsibility for this website, rather than Mr. Javed Sheikh. The
    website I believe was set up to protect myself and other victims from Worshipful Master
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    One of Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, victims contacted me this week
    in tears. Not only had Worshipful Master Simon Oliver taken her home, but he also took her
    two children from her.

    HM Procurator General, you may wish to inform Worshipful Master His Honour Judge
    Simon Oliver that the mother had worked for the Metropolitan Police in covert operations
    on child protection, reporting directly to a Chief Superintendent and Commander! Others
    victims like myself have Armed Forces backgrounds or associations.

    HM Procurator General, FREEMASONS! Respect, Integrity, Friendship and Charity.
    Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon Oliver may have informed you that I also
    was a London Freemason for 30 years. I was initiated into Freemasonry by Detectives
    from The Obscene Publications Branch, Metropolitan Police Service. The Masonic Lodge
    no longer functions, following the resignations of members over what HHJ Simon Oliver
    has done to me and others on this website.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  72. Criminal justice system failing disabled defendants, EHRC warns

    Report for England and Wales says move towards remote hearings may worsen situation

    In a report, called Inclusive Justice, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) calls for better treatment for those with learning disabilities, autism and brain injuries who have to go to court.

    The complexity of the criminal justice system and its specialist language presents a particular problem for disabled defendants and puts them at risk of not being able to participate effectively in the legal process, the report says.

    SEE https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/jun/11/criminal-justice-system-failing-disabled-defendants-ehrc-warns

  73. Len,

    This would be an ideal way to end any communication with Government / Court Communications such as:-

    In Argus Panoptes. Instead of yours sincerely or faithfully.

    I have deliberately left out the end of ….

    I bet you they would place those two words in the computer post-haste to establish their meaning, and get
    the biggest shock of their lives!

    ‘Brave colleagues indeed’

  74. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Below is the post-WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has falsely accused me of placing on
    the judges behaving badly website, in his sworn statement against Mr Javed Sheikh:

    [posted by len lawrence at 10:49pm on the 10 February 2018]
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE.
    IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT.
    I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!

    ————————————————————————
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    It took less than 24 hours to identify who made the above post, together with the correct
    date and time of posting. The person posting as ‘Fuck oliver’ would be known to WBr Simon
    Oliver, as well as Thames Valley Police. WBro HHJ Simon Oliver had removed a female teenager
    from the family. The actual post can be viewed below:

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE.
    I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM
    THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!
    ———————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    I will bow address the second false allegation the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry,
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, has made against me.

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  75. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Below is the ‘second’ post-WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has falsely accused me of
    placing on the judges behaving badly website, in his sworn statement against Mr Javed Sheikh:

    [posted by len lawrence at 10:49pm on 5 February 2018]
    ; “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”
    ————————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Again it took less than 24 hours to identify who made the above post, together with the correct
    date and time of posting. The posting was made by the following: THE WEBSITE HIS HONOUR
    JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT. Please see below:

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT says:
    February 6, 2018 at 1:40 am
    Maybe we should all go outside his house on [redacted] and protest there so all his neighbours
    know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too.
    —————————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Before I address the third allegation made against me by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire
    Freemasonry, WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, let us identify who is posting on this
    website as ‘Fuck oliver ‘

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  76. David Staples on Freemasonry:

    “That reminds us that we are being watched by something greater than ourselves and that, at some point at the end of our lives, we have to account for how we have behaved and what we’ve done during our lives to something greater than us.”

    God sees everything and he sees some rotten apples that need to be removed from Britain’s legal system, and be put in the dock at the Old Bailey.

    Oliver, you are a fool to persist in persecuting Mr. Sheikh and Mr. Lawrence. You are about to blow the whole of the justice system right out of the water.

    You know not who you are dealing with.

    Expect us.

  77. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    I apologise for using the term ‘Fuck oliver says’ but who is ‘Fuck oliver says’ ?

    Again it took less than 24 hours. The identity of ‘Fuck oliver says’ has been traced, including
    his address and a photo image. I will not disclose the details as I do not wish to identify the child.
    Detective Inspector Jonathan Gro…n, Thames Valley Police also knows a person that meets
    the criteria below:

    Had dealings with Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    Had dealings with Thames Valley Police
    Has a child who was removed by WBro HHJ Simon Oliver
    Cares about the child

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 21, 2018 at 5:06 pm
    This peice of shit has taken our daughter with no good reason. We are not scared of standing
    up to this so called democracy. Tvp are corrupt, Oliver is corrupt. WHY ARE WE STANDING
    BACK AND LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT?our daughter is about to turn 15 ,yet 6 months
    ago this monster removed her. Why not remove her 16 year old sister if we are bad parents?
    We work 24 7 and because of our NON engagement she was taken up north. 4 x hospital
    admissions with self harm and suicidal thoughts, our daughter. WE ARE NOT SCARED!
    This is the tip of the iceberg in regards to our daughter. WE MUST FIGHT!

    Like

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE.
    I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM
    THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!

    Like

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 9, 2019 at 6:28 pm

    I’VE JUST WITNESSED G4S AT THE FAMILY COURT IN READING AT APROX 15.00
    DELIVERING A BOX OF MONEY! THIS LUMP OF SHIT HAS REMOVED OUR DAUGHTER
    FOR NO REASON WHO IS NOW SUFFERING MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS, SHE IS 16.O

    Like
    ———————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Could Gilad Segal, Sandy Ferguson or Ms Louisa Lloyd-Jones Senior Lawyer | Ministry of
    Justice, Costs and Inquests Team Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group|
    Government Legal Department 102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL kindly
    forward to me the allegations that the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His
    Honour Judge Simon Oliver has made regarding my mental health.

    Upon receipt of WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver psychological diagnosis of myself
    I will forward the diagnosis to the Ministry of Defence for others for assessment.

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  78. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    WHY HAS WORSHIPFUL BROTHER, HIS HONOUR JUDGE, SIMON OLIVER, FAILED TO COMPY WITH
    THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO HIM BY THE NOW FORMER SENIOR HIGH COURT LIAISON JUDGE
    FOR THE THAMES VALLEY AREA, MRS JUSTICE ANNA PAUFFLEY, HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION?

    WORSHIPFUL BROTHER SIMON OLIVER CAN TELL YOU. IF NOT, I WILL.

    From: Oliver HHJudge

    Sent: 11 February 2013 15:21

    To: Horton, Chris C

    The papers in Lawrence need to go to Ms Bancroft-Rimmer in the Ct of Appeal (she is a Deputy master).

    However before they get there, I need to see the order I made, please, to see I f it needs to be amended
    in any way.

    I will also need to make an order retransferring it to CA.

    Many thanks

    SO

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver

    DFJ Reading County Court

    160-163 Friar Street,

    Reading, Berkshire RG1 1HE

    Tel0118-987-0500

    email:HHJudge.Oliver@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk

    DX 98010 Reading 6

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  79. Social media challenges the Crown’s legitimacy by broadcasting its injustice

    Social media is now challenging the Crown’s legitimacy. Social media reveals that Crown has been complicit. In these scandals it has been shown to lack justice, to abuse power, and to flout the law. The Crown has ruled by law but it has not accepted the rule of law. Social media has shown that the Crown has usurped the people’s power, popular sovereignty. The Crown’s title to rule is no longer valid. To shore up of its legitimacy, to burnish its valid title to rule, the Crown has sought to address the long running, deep seated, injustices within its system. In particular, the following investigations which challenge the Crown’s legitimacy and the legitimacy of its bodies would not have happened without social media.

    The Hillsborough Inquiry.
    The Goddard Inquiry into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse
    The Daniel Morgan Murder Independent Panel
    The Pitchford Inquiry in to Undercover Policing (SpyCops)

    Instead of lancing the boil of popular discontent, the inquiries have shown the full scale, scope and depth of the Crown’s corruption. Instead of shoring up the Crown’s legitimacy, the inquiries, panels, and inquests have eroded it further. The outcomes have shown the Crown, its institutions, and its agents have had scant regard for the public good, the rule of law, or justice. They have shown the British public that the Monarchy is an outdated institution. Why should someone in the 21st century obey an unelected person whose claim to rule is based on a 13th century standard?

    FULL ARTICLE HERE: https://lawrenceserewicz.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/social-medias-corrosive-effect-on-uk-monarchys-legitimacy/

  80. “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal. – Martin Luther King, Jr.

  84. https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2019-05-16.HL15807.h&s=home+office+criminals#gHL15807.q0

    Lord Marlesford Conservative

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 14 May (HL15405), whether they will name the three Home Office officials who were convicted in open court of criminal offences in connection with their official duties.

    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HL Deb, 31 May 2019, cW)

    They refuse to name them – not doubt for feat of class action law suits.

    I believe 50 were arrested altogether.

    Organised crime has infiltrated every public department, along with police, and the legal system. The Met has known about this for well over 20 years. It may explain why justice is rarely seen to be done these days.

  85. To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether any Home Office staff have been convicted of criminal offences since 9 April 2018; and if so, in each case, what was the (1) nature of the offence, (2) date of conviction, and (3) sentence received.

    Hansard source
    (Citation: HL Deb, 14 May 2019, cW)

    Photo of Baroness Williams of Trafford Baroness Williams of Trafford The Minister of State, Home Department, Minister for Equalities (Department for International Development)

    Answer here: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2019-04-29.HL15405.h&s=home+office+criminals#gHL15405.q0

  86. From ARGUS

    I hope you don’t mind me sending this message, it is important. This interview link
    with Len Lawrence a friend and colleague, also former Royal Navy and Government
    Service like myself, by Investigative Journalist Caroline, and a very good one too, tells
    the abusive manner in which he was treated by the Courts after being deliberately over
    medicated to feign a mental illness. Then totally asset stripped.

    After much investigation, even obstructions were used, to put us off prying deeper,
    even learned Judges and Barristers were not excluded. Judges were not even permitted
    or authorised to hear Len’s case, cases! Let alone make decisions upon the outcome.

    Len was deemed an extremely vulnerable person and subject to the Court of Protection.
    This means only a nominated Court of Protection Judge was allowed to hear the case.

    Len does himself justice in this interview, to stop what occurred to him being done to
    others. He explains what happened to him and how the Government and Legal system
    fleeced him and so many more veterans and individuals, taking every penny from them,
    also their homes to place all in the Government and lawyers pocket!

    It runs for approximately 15/18 minutes. This interview is really worth watching.

    Ensure this does not happen to you nor any family member(s).
    Best wishes,
    Semper Occultus (NI)

    Seeking the Truth, about The Court of Protection. – YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Jg1M2AQ_I
    Mar 1, 2019 – Len Lawrence with Caroline Stephens, Seeking the Truth, about The Court of Protection.

  87. Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C.
    Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC
    Lucy Frase QC

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C. was not the only Attorney General to have afforded me
    assistance, another Attorney General the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC. former
    Chairman, Intelligence and Security Committee had also afforded me assistance.

    However, Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC has still to have sight of the disrespectful
    entry made on the Thames Valley Police computer, following his request to
    Thames Valley Police to investigate the theft of documents from me.

    Lucy Frase QC former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice and later
    Solicitor General for England and Wales, now Minister of State for Prisons. I have
    on file communications from Lucy Frase QC Head of Office. If I require assistance
    from Lucy Frase QC I was to ask.

    Surprisingly, the police force that has afforded me the most assistance, and at times
    safeguarding, has been the Metropolitan Police Service.

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C. with assistance from the Crown Prosecution Service and
    Ministry of Justice has provided me with the legislation needed to set aside all the
    judgements in my case, without the need to appeal.

    At this present time, I am still awaiting confirmation from the Chief Constable and
    Deputy Chief Constable, Thames Valley Police, whether the Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificate, that I posted to them in August 2019 is authentic or fake.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps
    Who has been protecting the solicitor below? Solicitor Graeme Fraser held the first
    Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, issued to protect me but denied it’s existence
    in a letter to District Judge Jones at Slough County Court.

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, father was a senior partner of OGR Stock Denton LLP
    and chair of the Law Society’s legal aid committee. Many of Graeme Stephen FRASER
    family members have been solicitors, barristers and judges.

  88. Siobhan Baillie MP Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Ministry of Justice

    Siobhan Baillie MP notes place solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, SRA ID: 8844 SRA
    [now Head of Family Department, OGR Stock Denton LLP 2nd Floor, Winston House,
    2 Dollis Park, Finchley, London N3 1HF] at the hearing on the 18 August 2005 before
    HHJ Charles Elly, at Reading County Court.

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER was informed by barrister Simon Calhaem, instructed
    by Government Legal Services, that Laurence Oates, Office Solicitor to the Supreme
    Courts had not agreed on the sale value of my then home.

    Days later solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER had sealed a FINAL ORDER falsy alleging
    that Laurence Oates Office Solicitor to the Supreme Courts had not agreed on the sale
    value of my then home.

    Luke 8.17
    “For there is nothing hidden that will not become public, nothing under cover that will
    not be made known and brought out into the open”.

    Copies of Siobhan Baillie’s notes were found following a search at Reading County Court,
    they had been available to WBro HHJ Simon Oliver prior to the hearing on the 16 April 2012.

    Leonard Lawrence

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, father was a senior partner of OGR Stock Denton LLP
    and chair of the Law Society’s legal aid committee. Many of Graeme Stephen FRASER
    family members have been solicitors, barristers and judges.

  89. Dr. Vanessa Davies,
    Director-General, Bar Standards Board

    We do not have any powers to make Mr. Brazil, Mr. Allen answer your queries.
    The current Official Solicitor (Mr. Pitblado) wrote to the Bar Standards Board on 24 June 2009.

    In his letter he explained that the point had not been reached at which the Court of Protection
    should have been notified of the existence of the CP3.

    As the Bar Standards Board was entitled to do, we took views of the Official Solicitor Mr. Pitblado.

    ‘The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents’.

    24 August 2011 Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection;
    Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

    Dr. Vanessa Davies,
    Director-General, Bar Standards Board

    ———————————————————————

    THE NAMES OF THOSE THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE BARS STANDARDS BOARD, COMPLAINTS
    COMMITTEE, WHITEWASHING OF MY ABUSE HAS BEEN RECOVER FOR ME.

    ONE OF THE BARRISTERS THAT I COMPLAINED ABOUT WAS RECORDER NICHOLAS ALLEN QC.

    THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD OMITTED TO ADVISED ME THAT NICHOLAS ALLEN HAD BEEN
    A MEMBER OF THE COMPLAINS COMMITTE OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD.

    SOME MEMBERS OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD, COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE, DID NOT
    PARTICIPATE IN THE WHITEWASHING INCLUDING:

    SUE CARR QC

    NOW

    The Right Honourable Lady Justice Carr, a Lady Justice of Appeal

  91. Anonymous says:
    June 14, 2020 at 11:56 pm

    Dear Anonymous,

    Thames Valley Police appear reluctant to advise me who was Head of Thames Valley Police,
    Professional Standards Department, in 2015 and 2016. I have had to submit a Freedom of
    Information request.

    I believe that Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice, Tim De Meyer
    was the Head of Professional Standards Department in 2015 and 2016.

    Special proceeds were put into place to deal with my case, in 2015/2016 following another
    Police Force identifying offences of Fraud, Perjury and other more serious offences against
    me.

    Also, an internal Thames Valley Police review in 2015/16 identified that Thames Valley
    Police CID Reading, knew that BP Collins Solicitors held, but had failed to disclose a Part V11
    Medical Report, making me a patient subject to the Court of Protection.

    Did the now- Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police, know of the 2015/16
    CID review? He has certainly known since August 2019 of the Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificate dated 27 January 2005 that was issued by Dr Royds without a medical. He holds a
    copy of it.

    Leonard Lawrence

  92. Hi, Mark Anthony Taylor here, of http://www.shyreman.com.

    I can confirm your Lord Chief Justice, Sir Ian Burnett is as bent as they come – he covered up serious bank frauds, including those of Deutsche Bank rigging the Comex market.

    This was alleged by me in B40BM021 in June 2015 in the Birmingham Mercantile Court. The claim was dismissed and closed with a restraining order by now disgraced former judge Simon Staley Brown QC.

    You can see for yourself DB were rigging markets. They settled out of court for $100 million in New York and were forced to pay a $30 million fine in 2018: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7682-18.

    But in the UK the exposure was ultimately sabotaged by none other than Burnett.

    http://www.shyreman.com/docs/burnett/appeal.decision.2.pdf

    JP Morgan, Barclays, HSBC, UBS and RBS all piggy backed on Deutsche Bank’s defence, which turned out to be total bullshit:

    http://www.shyreman.com/docs/appeal.bundle/1-2.Defendant.Witness.Statement.pdf

    Burnett has proven himself to be a fool and a liar. He is in no position to sue me for libel. The ICO confirmed he had no transcript of hearing when he closed an application for appeal that stated over 20 points of misconduct against Simon Brown QC : http://www.shyreman.com/docs/appeal.bundle/grounds.for.appeal.2.0.pdf

    Brown was the butt of three sets of appeal judges, who all found him guilty of gross misconduct. He was termed the ‘copy and paste’ judge by the Daily Mail. i.e copying a corrupt claimants document and then pasting into his judgement. Judgement thus scripted by the plaintiff. In my case I was the plaintiff, and I got hit for a restraining order on the grounds of ‘demanding the attendance of the applicant of the oral hearing against me.’ Does that make sense? Of course not.

    I have proof on my website that Deutsche Bank rigged its audits. The evidence was sent to the FCA and the SFO and they both stonewalled it.

  93. Len, both of us know what they did, and we named the same named. Paul Kernaghan was in a position to understand misconduct done to us both. He did nothing as usual. JACO is a joke. (JOKEO?).

    We also know the Lord Chief Justices sat by and watched you get shafted with all the evidence before them. Constrast with Adrian PIE Fulford, wasn’t it Baron Thomas who gave him a letter of recommendation. Which LCJ was it who gave Bishop Peter Ball a letter of recommendation. Was it Thomas again?

  95. The Abstraction says:
    June 15, 2020 at 8:06 pm

    Dear The Abstraction,

    The association between The Lernaean Hydra and Medusa

    The Abstraction had a very high-security clearance, serving Government, like Tom and
    others. Look what they did to you and others !!

    Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge
    I was puzzled why Sir John Brigstocke, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,
    in his report to the Secretary of State for Justice and the Lord Chief Justice omitted to inform
    both of the existence of Court of Protection Medical Certificates of Mental Incapacity CP3’s
    that had never been disclosed to the Court of Protection by District Judges at Slough County
    Court, all of whom did not hold a Court of Protection a nomination. For 18 months I had
    been incapable of legal discussion and understanding, according to the former Chambers of
    Mr. Justice Stephen Cobb and Mr. Justice Nicholas Francis.

    It is now known that Nick Rose, Investigating Officer, Judicial Appointments and Conduct,
    Ombudsman made no reference in his report to Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge and the Secretary
    of State of Justice that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection, and what had occurred
    to me at Slough and Reading County Court.

    Paul Kernaghan, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman [JACO]
    When it became known that Nick Rose, Investigating Officer, Judicial Appointments and Conduct,
    Ombudsman had not disclosed my protected status in the report he prepared for the Lord Chief
    Justice Igor Judge and the Secretary of State of Justice, both John Critchfield, Head of Office
    Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman’s Office and Paul Kernaghan, Judicial
    Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman refused to inform the Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge
    and the Secretary of State of Justice of the omissions.

    Paul Kernaghan,
    Some history:
    Mr. Kernaghan was appointed Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary on 21st September 1999
    His police career culminated in a nine-year tenure as Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary.
    There is a letter headed Hampshire Constabulary Paul Kernaghan, Chief Constable, dated 06
    February 2002 MIC/Det. Supt/JJ/DM ‘Gosport Memorial Hospital’

    ‘Gosport Memorial Hospital’
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/gosport-hospital-scandal-deaths-jane-barton-opiate-painkiller-a8887651.html

    Apr 29, 2019 – Families who lost loved ones at Gosport Memorial Hospital.
    After a 20 year fight and 11 failed investigations, the Gosport Independent Panel revealed that as
    many as 650 patients were killed with medically unnecessary doses of opiate painkillers.

    “Since September 2018 a team led by Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing, representing the
    Eastern Policing Region, has been carrying out an independent assessment of the findings of
    the Gosport Independent Panel.

    Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing,
    Nick Downing was Detective Chief Superintendent Nick Downing, Metropolitan Police Service,
    I will always be grateful for his guidance and assistance! A GOOD COP.

    Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford
    In February 2013 when Mrs. Justice Pauffley instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case
    to the Civil Court of Appeal, Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford upheld a judgment by
    Master Basil Yoxall not to disclose my files and Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, to the
    Court of Protection and Court of Appeal.

    The files that Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford held were later placed on my living
    room table by an unknown source, including the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates.

    http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2014/03_04/2014_03_08_Martin_Mail_High_Court.htm

    Mar 8, 2014 – Lord Justice Fulford was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile … and state
    ‘Adrian’ would ‘ask Patricia Hewitt about the possibilities of.

    Joshua Rozenberg ‘The report exonerating Lord Justice Fulford should be published’
    It is no surprise that claims linking the judge to paedophile campaigners were dismissed,
    but why not tell us the reason?

    Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, former lord chief justice of Northern Ireland.

    Having conducted a challenging and interrogative inquiry, Lord Kerr concluded that the
    allegation that Sir Adrian had been a supporter of the PIE was without substance. On the
    evidence that had been presented and on the basis of the interviews which he had conducted,
    Lord Kerr concluded that Sir Adrian was not and had never been a supporter of PIE or its aims.
    Further there was no reason for Sir Adrian to have disclosed his association with the NCCL
    on appointment to judicial office.
    ———————————————
    TO REFRESH MEMORIES START WITH THE INTERCEPTION BY CUSTOMS AND EXCISE OF
    MAGAZINES SENT FROM AMSTERDAM. THE RAID BY WEST MERCIA POLICE ON THE HOME
    OF PETER RIGHTON. THE P.I.E. LIST RECOVERED AND TAKEN TO SCOTLAND YARD. CHARLES
    NAPIER THE ONE TIME TREASURE OF P.I.E. ALSO DR MORRIS FRASER. THE PROMINENT CHILD
    PSYCHIATRIST AND PIE [Paedophile Information Exchange] FOUNDER MEMBER WHO THE
    GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL ALLOWED TO WORK AT UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL LONDON.

    Peter Righton – Islington Survivors Network
    islingtonsurvivors.co.uk › peter-righton
    Peter Righton was a social worker and academic who in 1992 was fined £900 for possession
    of abusive images of children. He was a member of the .

  96. Len,

    The long awaited, Coup de grâce I suspect – although it could also be termed a Coup de théâtre too

  99. To: Len Lawrence
    Subject: Paul Kernaghan, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman

    Paul Kernaghan the man with a QPM and CBE.

    Len if you notice that this chap Kernaghan holds the QPM the Queens Police Medal.
    I suggest he remembers he is not a Police Officer any longer, and be a little more careful in his
    abrupt response. I expect it be fine if serving still, as that is the manner many arsehole senior
    officers spoke to and replied to their officers.

    It shows the contempt they display to the public.

    Utter non-respect.

    All the best Len

  102. HAHA -so funny! In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.

  103. Len, I see from Gilad Segal’s letter that the government legal group is “positive about disabled people”. Isn’t that phrase inherently discriminatory? It implies that it is questionable as to whether people should be positive about disabled people or not. Does it really need to be stated? It’s a bit of a backhander if you ask me.

    You should sue them too.

  104. If Len wanted to sue the government legal department. He will need taxpayers money to fund the case. I guess he will need to contact the ministry of justice then who would be more than happy to use the back door to get some taxpayers money for private litigation

  105. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    C/O Louisa.Lloyd-Jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Anonymous says:
    June 17, 2020 at 2:42 am

    Dear HM Procurator General and Anonymous,

    Regarding the sentence below:
    I see from Gilad Segal’s letter that the government legal group is “positive about disabled people”

    Matthew Coats was very “positive about disabled people” and extremely kind and helpful to me.

    Matthew Coats has held senior positions at the Ministry of Justice:
    Matthew Coats, Director-General for EU Exit Implementation,
    Matthew Coats, Ministry of Justice, Chief Operating Officer
    Matthew Coats, Director-General of the Legal Aid Agency & Corporate Services Group

    However, others are not “positive about disabled people”

    Around 2007 the Legal Services Commission awarded me a Legal Aid Certificate to seek damages
    against the Legal Services Commission for around £13,000. St John’s Chambers, 101 Victoria Street
    Bristol, BS1 6PU had my Legal Aid Certificate discharged, without ever obtaining my case files
    from the office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts. (files obtained in March 2012).

    The Legal Services Commission, Customer Redress Committee, headed by Commissioner Beryl
    Seaman CBE JP, falsely alleged that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge that I had
    been a patient subject to the Court of Protection, when my signature was gained on legal forms
    by solicitor Sarah Bridgett BENFIELD (now a solicitor based at Clifton Ingram’s Reading), without
    the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    Records now obtained show that solicitor Sarah Bridgett BENFIELD was receiving instructions from
    solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor, so as to avoid an application to the Court
    of Protection.

    A sworn affidavit was filed at Aylesbury County Court by the Legal Services Commission, falsely
    alleging that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge of my former mental incapacity.

    Solicitor Dina Rawal had prepared a report for Commissioner Beryl Seaman CBE JP, Head of the
    Legal Services Commission, Customer Redress Committee, identifying that I had been subject to
    the Court of Protection. Thereafter, Dina Rawal in a sworn affidavit to Aylesbury Court Court,
    falsely alleged that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge of my former mental
    incapacity.

    Solicitor Dina Rawal made two unsuccessful attempts at Aylesbury County Court to have me
    Sectioned under the Mental Health Act 1983. Both attempts were stopped, once by District
    Judge Brooks and once by District Judge Moystn.

    Around the 1st August 2008, now as a litigant in person, my case came before District Judge Robin
    Chaudhuri, sitting at Milton Keynes County Court
    Present was;
    Barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal 33 Bedford Row Chambers (Instructed by Legal Services Commission)
    Solicitor Silas Peter Sebastian CATLING Legal Services Commission
    Solicitor Dina Rawal Legal Services Commission

    The Hearing

    a) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri, inquired could the Legal service Commission not settle this claim.

    b) Silas Catling LSC Solicitor responded that he was told to fight the case by powers above. Ruth Wayte,
    Legal Director, Legal Service Commission.

    c) Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal 33 Bedford Row Chambers London WC1R 4JH
    Skeleton argument alleged funding was lawfully granted.

    (Leonard Lawrence signature was obtained on Public Funding Forms after he was Certified under Part
    V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and subject to the Court of Protection. CLSMEANS1 identifying Leonard
    Lawrence was £331,000 over the eligibility limit for public funding.

    d) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri strikes out my claim.

    e) Only after the Hearing did barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S. Otwal and Mr. Silas Catling then allowed me,
    Leonard. Lawrence, to photocopy the document below:

    The Legal Service Commission Manual Volume 2, Part F pages 198 to 303.

    f) Neither Mukhtiar Otwal (Barrister), Silas Catling (Solicitor) and Dina Rawal (Solicitor) disclosed this
    information to District Judge Robin Chaudhuri or to me, Leonard Lawrence, prior to, or during the
    hearing on the 1 August 2008.

    g) 18 September 2008 Jonathan Flewers, Legal Service Commission, Corporate Legal Team, stated in
    S/IC/FOI(19) Log No 1018
    “The position is that the LSC cannot lawfully grant funding to an individual if they are not financially
    eligible.

    Leonard Lawrence was not eligible by some £331,000

    h) Access Data Request to the Legal Service Commission, Corporate Legal Team.
    Response: Not in the Public Interest to release part of Mr. Lawrence Public Funding file.

    i) Matthew Coats, the now-former Ministry of Justice, Chief Operating Officer.
    Matthew Coats has released to me, Leonard Lawrence, all documents that the Legal Service
    Commission, Corporate Legal Team, identified as: ‘Not in the Public Interest to release’.

    j) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri said on the 1 August 2008 that he had routinely seen hundreds
    of Court of Protection patients signatures obtained on Legal Aid Forms, without the knowledge
    of the Court of Protection, when the patients like myself were Hundred of Thousands of pounds
    over the Legal Aid Limit! Strange, but District Judge Robin Chaudhuri was not a Court of Protection
    judge at that time!

    WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

    District Judge Robin Chaudhuri is now sitting at Peterborough Combined Court. He is now a
    Court of Protection Judge !!

    Solicitor Silas Peter Sebastian CATLING is now a Legal Ombudsmen

    Solicitor Dina Rawal is now Senior Case Manager, The Legal Aid Agency, Ministry of Justice

    Barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal is now at 42 Bedford Row Chambers London WC1R

    Ruth Wayte, Director of Legal Aid Casework and a member of the Executive Team and the Legal
    Aid Agency Board.
    ————————————————————————-

    FINALLY, TO QUOTE GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT

    “THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ALWAYS GETS PUBLIC FUNDING”

    “NO NEED TO GO TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION”

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  106. “has released to me, Leonard Lawrence, all documents that the Legal Service
    Commission, Corporate Legal Team, identified as: ‘Not in the Public Interest to release’.”

    Do they mean that it is not in the government’s interest to let the public know about the corruption? Is that what this means?

    TO QUOTE GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT

    “THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ALWAYS GETS PUBLIC FUNDING”

    “NO NEED TO GO TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION”

    So the reason why Helen Mary Clift and her friends in the private sector draw in business into the Official Solicitor’s Office, thereby denying vulnerable people the protection of the Court of Protection is so that they can operate a complex criminal racket to steal public funds and put them into the hands of private solicitors.

    They are defrauding the government, and therefore the taxpayer.

    How evil is that? I wonder how many cases they have done this on – taking legal aid and giving it freely to their friends?

    Len’s case is FULLY DOCUMENTED. You can run, Helen Clift et al , but you can’t hide now.

  107. Louisa.Lloyd-Jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Anonymous says:
    June 17, 2020 at 10:05 pm

    Dear Anonymous,

    What solicitor Government Legal Services solicitor Helen Mary Clift, office of the Offical Solicitor,
    and her friends in the private sector have still to learn is the contents of an internal police review
    of my case. The findings of this police review had been denied to me by Detective Inspector,
    Gavin Tyrrell, Thames Valley Police in 2016.

    I will arrange to post a copy of the internal Thames Valley Police review of my case on this website.

    However, documents obtained from two other sources suggests Detective Inspector, Gavin Tyrrell,
    Thames Valley Police was being bullied by more senior police officers within Thames Valley Police,
    including the now-former Detective Superintendent Gillian (Gill) Wootton, former Head of Specialist
    Operations and Covert Policing.

    Regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    Detective Inspector, Gavin Tyrrell is now Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell, City of London
    Police.

    Economic Crime Conference 2019
    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell, City of London Police
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations, City of London Police

    Gavin Tyrrell is a police officer leading the City of London and National Lead Force Fraud
    Operations. His portfolio covers Complex Economic Crime investigations, Money Laundering,
    Bribery and Corruption, Asset Recovery as well as proactive operations.

    Gavin began his service with Thames Valley Police working largely in covert policing roles
    fighting organised crime before becoming head of economic and cybercrime in 2011.

    Transferring to the City of London Police Gavin and his teams now also support complex
    investigation across the United Kingdom to enhance local capability and service delivery.

    Experienced working across Europe, US and Africa, Gavin is the United Kingdom’ economic
    crime representative to the European Union and has influenced recent policy amendments.

  108. Len!

    Even tractors now on Autopilot GPS

    You may recall the name Josiah. He was crowned king when he was only “eight years old” (2 Kings 22:1).
    Years later, in his mid-twenties, Hilkiah the high priest found “the Book of the Law” in the temple (v. 8).

    It was then read to the young king, who tore his robes in sorrow due to his ancestors’ disobedience
    to God. Josiah set about to do what was “right in the eyes of the Lord” (v. 2). The book became a tool
    to steer the people so there would be no turning to the right or left. God’s instructions were there to
    set things straight.

    Allowing the Scriptures to guide us day by day keeps our lives in line with knowing God and His will.

    The Bible is an amazing tool that, if followed, keeps us moving straight ahead.

    By John Blase

  110. What do they mean, “no factual basis”? She forgot to list the First Amendment rights.

  111. Leonard Lawrence,

    People are looking at your LinkedIn profile

    Regional Security Officer at United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service Washington DC

    United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service Washington DC
    Is the federal law enforcement and security arm of the United States Department of State.
    Its special agents are unique in the U.S. in being both members of the Foreign Service and law enforcement
    officers.

  112. Len,
    John has put this out to all Veterans, so that it is circulated and copied around the world.

  113. Sir Andrew McFarlane, The President of the Family Division, and Head of Family Justice.

    Sir Andrew,
    I will be forwarding to you a copy of a letter posted to me by Deputy High Court Family Judge Richard
    Anelay QC, former Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk, dated 9 September 2010.

    Quote:
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that you were a patient
    and subject to the Court of Protection”.

    [District Judge Fortgang has never held a Court of Protection authorisation]

    Deputy High Court Family Judge Richard Anelay QC letter dated 9 September 2010 was available to
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, on the 16 April 2012.

    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————-
    16 April 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    “It actually says in there, We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    17 July 2012 11:59:49
    Email: James Batey, Authorised Court Officer, Court of Protection
    “HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination”

    Email from James Batey, Authorised Court Officer, Court of Protection
    Practice Note:
    Official Solicitor Laurence Oates, Master of the Court of Protection and the Senior District Judge
    at the Principal Registry of the Family Division of the High Court.
    Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983
    Only the persons listed in s94 Mental Health Act 1983 may give any approval or make any order
    required for the management of property and affairs of a patient under Part VII of that Act. These
    persons are the nominated judges of the Court of Protection (High Court judiciary of the Chancery
    and Family divisions), the Master of the Court of Protection and his nominated Officers.

    30 August 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    Handed down his judgment on Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and refuses permission to appeal
    out of time. However, HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Whilst, my former solicitors Simpson Millar LLP and Sarah Christou, Senior Operations Manager,
    Court of Protection, were of the belief that they had destroyed all of my case files by 2013 they are
    mistaken.

    An electronic court transcript of the hearing on the 16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver, at
    Reading County Court has been recovered. HHJ Simon Oliver gives his considered legal opinion
    regarding the role of the Court of Protection in the mistaken belief that as a Part V11 Family Judge
    he was authorised to conduct Court of Protection hearings.

    Also, made available to me is the transcripts and judgement handed down by a Lord Justice of
    Appeal of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Permission to Appeal Part V11 Mental Health
    Act 1983 is not required. Tens of Thousands of pounds of Legal Aid Funding had been unnecessary
    claimed by solicitors and barristers.

    September 2012
    Judge Philip Waller CBE, a nominated judge of the Court of Protection the and Senior District
    Judge of the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD), instructed: Leonard Lawrence’s
    case files in the first instance be sent to the Court of Protection and an Appeal be filed at the
    Court of Protection.

    In October 2012
    Court of Appeal Judiciary telephoned HHJ Simon Oliver, Reading County Court advising that the
    Court of Appeal did not have jurisdiction, the case had to go to a nominated Court of Protection
    judge.

    11 February 2013 15:21
    Email: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    The papers in Lawrence need to go to Bancroft-Rimmer in the Court of Appeal
    I will need to make an order retransferring it to Court of Appeal

    From: Civil Appeals – Registry [mailto:civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
    Sent: 14 August 2014 08:57
    To: ‘len lawrence’
    Subject: RE: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver:
    From: Civil Appeals – Registry [mailto:civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
    Dear Sirs,
    Your request is not possible to achieve as the file has not been forwarded to our offices as of yet.

  114. Barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN
    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive, Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN
    Email: bensilverstone@matrixlaw.co.uk

    Dear Mr. Silverstone,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, WBr His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr. Javed Sheikh

    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) Harassment proceedings brought by a Circuit Judge relating
    to online publications.

    Mr. Silverstone,
    It would have been helpful had you, Matrix Chambers and Government Legal Department informed
    me of the false allegations made against me by WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver in his statement
    to the Queens Bench Division, prior to submitting the statement to The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian
    Knowles, who practiced at Matrix Chambers, prior to his appointment as a Justice of the High Court
    in October 2017.

    Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3389 (QB)
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
    Case No: QB/2019/000194 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
    Date:10/12/2019
    Before: MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES
    Between : HIS HON OUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Defendant
    Ben Silverstone (instructed by GLD) for the Claimant
    The Defendant appeared in person
    Hearing dates: 29 November 2019

    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES
    Approved Judgment

    52. In early February 2018 there were a series of messages suggesting a protest about the Claimant
    outside the Ministry of Justice. Then, on 6 February 2018 someone posted this message; “Maybe
    we should all go outside his house on [redacted] and protest there so all his neighbours know what
    hes doing and to be warned from him too.”

    53. This was followed on 20 February 2018 by a post part of which read: “OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY
    GRITTY, WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM BAGS HOME ! …”

    —————————————————————
    Mr. Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, and Government Legal Department, had you informed me of the
    false allegations made against me by WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver in his statement to the
    Queens Bench Division, prior to submitting the statement to The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian
    Knowles, I could have neutralized the false allegations.

    In WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver statement to the Queen’s Bench Division, HHJ Simon Oliver
    falsely accused me (Leonard Lawrence) of making the statements referred to in MR JUSTICE JULIAN
    KNOWLES Approved Judgment at points 52. and 53. See below:

    Point 52
    [posted by len lawrence at 10:30pm on 5 February 2018];
    “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”

    THE WEBSITE INDENTIFIES THAT THE POSTING WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY THE FOLLOWING:

    ‘HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER-EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT’
    February 6, 2018 at 1:40am
    “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”

    Point 53
    [posted by “len lawrence” at 10.49 on 10 February 2018]
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM
    BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL
    WANT TO EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL
    FAMILY!”

    THE WEBSITE INDENTIFIES THAT THE POSTING WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY THE FOLLOWING:

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM BAGS
    HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO
    EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!”

    THERE ARE FURTHER POSTINGS ON THE WEBSITE BY [Fuck oliver says:]

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 21, 2018 at 5:06 pm
    This peice of shit has taken our daughter with no good reason. We are not scared of standing up to
    this so called democracy. Tvp are corrupt, Oliver is corrupt. WHY ARE WE STANDING BACK AND
    LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT?our daughter is about to turn 15 ,yet 6 months ago this monster
    removed her. Why not remove her 16 year old sister if we are bad parents? We work 24 7 and because
    of our NON engagement she was taken up north. 4 x hospital admissions with self harm and suicidal
    thoughts, our daughter. WE ARE NOT SCARED! This is the tip of the iceberg in regards to our daughter.
    WE MUST FIGHT!

    Mr. Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, and Government Legal Department,
    I have no need or desire to visit HHJ Simon Oliver’s home, the now-former Provincial Grand Secretary,
    Berkshire Freemasonry, will explain why.

    Secondly, Berkshire and other Freemasons that do not support Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver have
    visited me.

    Finally, following HHJ Simon Oliver’s email on 11 February 2013 15:21 to Master Bancroft-Rimmer, at
    the Civil Court of Appeal, it is now known that the Crown Prosecution Service had reviewed my case
    and request that the police visit me. It has been confirmed that the police officer that was tasked to
    visit me made a false entry on a police log, falsely alleging that she had attended my home and spoken
    to me at length. The email that it is alleged was sent to Thames Valley Police cannot be found!

    Leonard Lawrence
    18 June 2020
    ——————————————————————————–
    I suggest WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver knows who is posting as Fuck Oliver’s says:

    Facebook postings:

    Posting by daughter

    14 September 2017 ·

    UPDATE ;;;;;

    I was in court on the 6th October to fight to get me home and the Judge ( Judge Simon Oliver ) didn’t
    take into concept of what myself and my parents had to say to try get me home. He focused on all the
    lies the corrupt social services have made. We were meant to get seen at 10am but ended up getting
    seen at 2:10pm because the judge had a cough but I believe he was too busy taking bribes off some
    more people. I then walked out of he court room and the court and had a mental breakdown outside.
    Once I got back I had a panic attack and was very emotional. A get reading reporter came to report all
    of this but they had a melt down about it and sent him away and threatened us all of imprisonment
    if we spoke with the reporter. I spoke to the judge before hand and broke down crying in front of him
    begging him to let me go home. Yet he didn’t care.

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE KEEP SHARING!!!!!

    I have been debating whether to post this for quite a while now but the public is the only thing that
    can help myself and my family now.
    02/08/17.. that was when I received the worst possible news. That the social services have got a court
    order to take me away from my parents, friends, family, my area.. literally everything. I told the judge,
    my solicitor, social worker and many others that I didn’t want to move yet they didn’t take into
    consideration how I feel and what would happen to my mental health if I got removed. I then hid for
    two days and then the police found me when I was walking through a field.

    They raided my friends houses at 4am and 6am looking for me even though no one knew where I was,
    along with my parents. They also went round my house with 15 – 20 police officers to search my house
    and even turned up with the dog unit and a key to knock off my door. My parents, sister and brother
    had no clue where I was and was as concerned as they were. Yet they arrested my parents and kicked
    my dogs, sister and brother out of the house for the night. The police took their house keys and put
    my house as a crime scene.

    My parents recorded it and had posted it on YouTube so you can see how disgusting the police treated
    my house and my mum and dad. Once I got found they took my to Newbury police station and made
    me wait for three and a half hours. Two police officers took me to The oaks in Leicester and I got there
    at 12:30am. Since I have been removed my hair has been falling out excessively and my appetite has
    been effected massively. I have became very depressed and have been in and out of hospital. I rarely
    sleep and I isolate myself. I have also gained many stress rashes on my face.

    The staff at the oaks shouldn’t be working in a care home as they treat all the kids there terribly. The
    manager made fun of a girl with anorexia and the assistant manager called another child ‘scum’.
    They slag off my parents and myself to other staff members who then discuss my private stuff with
    other kids in the home. I would isolate myself all day and no one would come and see if I’m okay when
    they know how I have been feeling. One night for dinner I was given two bread rolls and that was it.
    I rarely sleep and most nights I’m crying. I have become very depressed and suicidal but the social
    services don’t care.

    I have managed to get it back to court on the 6th of October but the judge is very corrupt. He takes
    bribes of people which he calls ‘gifts’. I will put a link to a website about what he does at the end.
    The staff at the oaks also call a girl ‘ a little chink ‘ and they say every Asian is related to her. They
    always try to push you to a point where they get a reaction. I am only 14 I know but I know the
    difference of what is right and what is wrong and I know full well I shouldn’t of been removed from
    my parents. They are good parents but the social services made up so many lies just to get me removed.
    Me and India, another child at the oaks, have been tormented by the staff non-stop and it’s utterly
    disgusting. This was meant to be a “therapeutic care home” yet I have received no therapy what so
    ever. Darren Grimshaw, the assistant manager, said to a child ‘ you should keep watching wentworth
    because that’s where your end up you little bitch’.

    When I got admitted to hospital overnight I found out that Lyndsay Bryden, the manager, went
    through my diary which has personal stuff in. She had no right or reason to go through it. Complaints
    have been made. I have been blocked from wifi and they are trying to take my phones off me but I won’t
    let them as I use them to get hold of my parents and friends.

    Yesterday ( 13/08/17 ) I got told I was moving placement that day. I was very shocked and scared as i
    had no notice the following days. I got taken even further away from home and got taken to hospital
    again for suicidal thoughts. I have self-harmed since I have been removed which I never done whilst
    I was with my parents. I am posting this to try and expose what horrible people kids are getting placed
    with and how disgusting the social services have treated myself and my family and friends. If you know
    anyone who can help me or my family please message me as I am trying my hardest to get myself home.

    PLEASE LIKE, SHARE AND COMMENT!!!!
    I have also attached images of my hair, rash and the dirt I have lived in since I got moved to the oaks.

    https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCTOI7CKoLhOCEaHmOo0p6AA

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

  115. Dear Friends,

    3 years ago a family member said “To be Black (or Brown) and poor in this world means that justice does not
    exist for you and your life means NOTHING.

    What’s the point in calling for JUSTICE when the definition isn’t the same for you?

    What’s the point in being law-abiding when they will always see you as a threat?

    What’s the point in telling someone to “be safe” when the streets, the institutions and this world are not.

    What’s the point in saying it will get better when for hundreds of years, the injustice, inequality and racism
    remains the same albeit in different forms.”

    Never are these words more true than now. Be safe, injustice, these are words that mean different things
    to different people and when I look at what is happening in the world right now and I reflect on our ongoing
    battle I can’t put my hand on my heart and say I don’t believe that if we didn’t have an African family name,
    we wouldn’t have been treated differently.

    The outcome would certainly be the same, the lies, corruption, cover- up BUT the micro aggressive behaviours
    we experience, the profiling, the dehumanisation by the institutionally racist police and others in authority,
    I argue would have not existed.

    Life matters ?

  116. If there are any good police officers of judiciary, then they need to start speaking out because the corrupt ones are taking you down with them.

  117. Thank you Thames Valley Police

    Transcribed from the official recording by AUSCRIPT LIMITED
    TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
    10TH FEBRUARY 2014
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
    (QUEENS BENCH DIVISION)
    SITTING AT READING COUNTY COURT
    Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER

    JUDGE OLIVER
    Page 5
    16. “…in discussion with the presiding judge in relation to civil matters, the Honourable
    Mr Justice Singh, I was appointed the President of the Queens Bench Division…”
    —————————————————————————-
    COURTS ON TRIBUNALS JUDICIARY

    The Right Honourable Sir Brian Henry Leveson was appointed President of the Queen’s Bench
    Division in October 2013 and retired as President of the Queen’s Bench Division with effect from
    23 June 2019.
    ——————————-
    It is, also, only fair to Mr. Justice Rabinder Singh now The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Rabinder Singh,
    be allowed the opportunity to refute the claims.

    Leonard Lawrence

  118. Anonymous says:
    June 19, 2020 at 1:29 pm
    If there are any good police officers of judiciary, then they need to start speaking out because the corrupt ones are taking you down with them.

    From Leonard Lawrence in reply to Anonymous says:

    There are both good police officers and judiciary, including some within Thames Valley Police.

    However, there is bullying within the police service and the judicary. Increasingly, more and more websites
    like HHJ Simon Oliver, judges behaving badly are appearing. See below:

    Private Intelligence Agency,
    Intelligence UK LLP / Stop Corruption UK LLP is the UK’s first private intelligence agency dedicated to
    targeting perpetrators of domestic corruption in the public and private sectors

    http://www.intelligenceuk.com/newsx16.html

  119. Len, not only did Oliver accuse you of causing civil unrest outside his property but he also accused a doctor of plotting an anthrax attack against him! and holding his family hostage! Nothing which is supported with any evidence! Simon Oliver has really let himself down on this one and to say that he is now issuing and misusing committal proceedings is even a bigger joke. We would all like to see the evidence he is relying upon.

  120. BG says:
    June 19, 2020 at 11:17 pm

    Len, not only did Oliver accuse you of causing civil unrest outside his property but he also accused a doctor of plotting an anthrax attack against him! and holding his family hostage! Nothing which is supported with any evidence! Simon Oliver has really let himself down on this one and to say that he is now issuing and misusing committal proceedings is even a bigger joke. We would all like to see the evidence he is relying upon.

    From Leonard Lawrence in reply to Anonymous says:

    Dear BG
    Yes, HHJ Simon Oliver accuse me of planning civil unrest outside his Wokingham home
    Yes, Mr Shaikh was accused of plotting an anthrax attack.

    What is puzzling is The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement Oliver v Shaikh [2019]
    EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was posted within hours of the hearing on the
    29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the Approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable
    Mr. Justice Julian Knowles on the 10 December 2019.

    Leonard Lawrence

  121. Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms Homes,

    The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB)

    What is puzzling is how The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was
    posted within hours of the hearing on the 29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the
    Approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles on
    the 10 December 2019.

    Approved Judgement-Matrix Chambers
    29 Nov 2019-HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER
    Claiment..harassment against the defendant, Javid Sheikh, who was a litigant in proceedings.

    http://www.matrixlaw.co.uk › judgments › judge-wins-summ…
    Dec 10, 2019 – Judge wins summary judgment against harassing litigant in High Court …

    Ms Homes,
    Whilst I have not been named in Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB), I have a specific interest in paragraphs 52.
    and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement. Would you please enquire
    with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of these specific allegations
    that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence) prior to
    seeking summary judgment.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  122. Hi Len,
    Chances are the submission to the Matrix Chambers website would have been sent by email.
    That means multiple logs, particularly those of Oliver’s service provider through which the email
    was sent, and those of the Matrix Chambers email accounts.

    The email would be timestamped as it passed through different email providers, and it could well have
    been digitally signed, so any attempt to change the timestamp would lead to a failure to verify the email
    when used with authentication tools.

    You could ask someone in Matrix Chambers Rachel Holmes to get you the original email with time stamps.

  123. so his honour judge Simon Oliver does not like people writing about him on this website and on the internet in general!? Well, I guess we should start copying this blog with all the comments. Lets spread the word now! And start copying

  124. Lenny

    Look for evidence that a pre-written judgement was written prior to the oral hearing on the 29 November 2019

  126. Predetermined decision = rigged, corruption, dishonest judiciary, misconduct, perversion of justice.

    Equal treatment before the law is a pillar of democratic societies. When courts are
    corrupted by greed or political expediency, the scales of justice are tipped, and ordinary people
    suffer. Judicial corruption means the voice of the innocent goes unheard, while the guilty act with
    impunity.
    –Huguette Labelle, Chair of Transparency International (TI), 2007

  127. Judicial independence is a necessity for a non-corrupt judiciary, but it is not enough, since an
    independent judiciary itself might be corrupt. Judges must also be impartial, honest and
    competent. It is hard to exaggerate the negative consequences of judicial corruption, both
    nationally and internationally: combating transnational crime and terrorism becomes unfeasible; it
    diminishes economic and human development; and it denies citizens their long
    recognized right to impartial dispute settlements.

  128. From: len lawrence
    Sent: 21 June 2020 00:20
    To: rachelholmes@matrixlaw.co.uk
    Cc: fraud@ukfraudreport.co.uk

    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms. Holmes,

    Please would you inquire with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of the specific
    allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs
    52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone
    seeking summary judgement?

    Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within paragraphs 52. and 53 can be identified,
    if required.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc

  129. They are all at it Len,

    Pre written judgements as I experienced in the court of appeal and outcome driven ones in the lower courts. corruptionaboundsintheuk.wordpress.com

  130. Dear Len

    This can only have been achieved by a predetermined decision,

    Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement

    “What is puzzling is how The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was
    posted within hours of the hearing on the 29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the
    approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles “.

    Moreover, the Approved Judgement cannot be superseded by any other document. Likewise
    if the Approved Judgment was found to have mistakes contained within , the Approved
    Judgement would be cancelled /recalled.

    It is a simple issue of these twats wanting to have all their ducks in a row and the author of
    the your Judgement AINT Judge Knowles

    Alan

  131. All cases start here with TVP instructions, where all are systematically pre-planned
    and yes to your question all stating orders come from Oliver

    starts with picking the victim via getting stalked by TVP,

    1 Parents get unexpected visits for no reason and challenges made with aggregation
    pre-planned to remove the parent/parents whether guilty or not by any means

    2 the home is ransacked without warrants excuse is for ID and steal children, silence the parents by mistaking keeping them locked up,

    3. falsify orders in false names, produce and stamp data in silence courts without any communication with parents

    4. when challenged, everyone, who helped the parents curiously resign
    Through threats by Oliver and his TVP team,

    We have a case where the mother has 4 release orders for a child, but Judge Oliver has instructed the social service to ignore them, although these rules overwrite his long. Oliver believes that being deleted from the system as never produced is the answer to anyone via blocking or preventing the return of a child we experienced this 1st hand by the head of the social service who reported this when written a letter of breach
    as gagging is a criminal offence, indirect and direct

    his answer was that he does not know how to respond. His hands are tied to Oliver’s request since he too has no job and will face the prison. So we brought him up to date on punishing ignorance of the government in both directions.

  132. Check out the high court judges profiles. The scumbags have all gone to Cambridge university or Oxford university. Looks like Cambridge and Oxford university are breeding grounds for crooked judges to bring harm to British civilians. Now you know why people look down at court judges. They are evil to the core and when you talk about them on the internet, they hate it

    https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/high-court-judges-2017

  133. These are Her Majesty’s judiciary. When you take into account the Marxist activity currently taking place around the world and the fact that the public is becoming increasingly aware of public corruption and outright crime, then the monarchy itself is on the brink of destruction. There will be statues erected to Simon Oliver for kicking it all off – the decline of the British Empire.

    Is the Lord Chief Justice being prevented from taking action by the Queen herself?

  134. Capt. Lawrence

    Go on to twitter, Find someone who is interested in your subject, or trying to cover it up, then leave a reply
    in their pinned tweet in the form of an image that conveys the key info.

    That way when anyone browses the replies in their pinned tweet you get your message at the top in a nice
    convenient format.

    Also since each image upload is different timestamp, the images are treated differently, which means they
    cannot be marked as spam

    Guile

  135. Leonard

    Cosslett & Barr Forensic Document Examination.

    Forensic Science Report on;

    Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB)

  136. I can type up to 50 words per minute and I must admit, even I can’t write a judgement to that length within a couple of hours and then upload it.

  137. Sir Jonathan Guy Jones KCB QC
    HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Profession

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Case No: QB/2019/000194

    HM Procurator General in the above litigation Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver made several
    false allegations against me, that neither Government Legal Services and their instructed barrister
    Benjamin Silverstone ‘Matrix Chambers’ alerted me to, prior to obtaining a summary judgement
    from The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Queens Bench Division.

    Judiciary and lawyers are not exempt from interference from higher authority. I understand that
    the Ministry of Justice are financing Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver litigation. Mr Shaikh
    has provided me with copies of all documents served upon him.

    I am advised that the case has now been passed to The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin.

    I am awaiting a reply from Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building,
    Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LNP why Matrix Chambers and barrister Benjamin Silverstone did not
    informed me of the specific allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me
    (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs 52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement,
    prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin will also need to be advised of HHJ Simon Oliver appointment
    to President of the Queens Bench Division. Please see below.

    Transcribed from the official recording by AUSCRIPT LIMITED
    HHJ Simon Oliver on the 10th February 2014 at Reading County Court.
    HHJ Simon Oliver
    16….in discussion with the presiding judge in relation to civil matters, the Honourable Mr Justice
    Singh, I was appointed the President of the Queens Bench Division………… I am already an S9 Family
    Division Reading High Court Judge.

    HM Procurator General,
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has sound reasons to discredit me.
    A Section 9 Family Judge does not automatically hold a Court of Protection authorisation. There is
    a period from around 2011 until 7 October 2015 when His Honour Judge Oliver was of the mistaken
    belief that he could hear Court of Protection cases.

    Likewise, Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver belief that the Honourable Mr Justice Singh, had
    appointed HHJ Simon Oliver the President of the Queens Bench Division, how many Civil Restraint
    Orders and Extended Civil Restraint Orders has HHJ Simon Oliver issued in the mistaken belief,
    I suggest, that he was President of the Queens Bench Division

    HM Procurator General,
    The allegations regarding my mental health

    Re: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

    On the 8 February, 2006
    Consultant Psychiatrist Wing Commander Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych RAF Rtd
    wrote a medical report about me to the Court of Protection London. The report cannot be disclosed
    and was destroyed by Goverment Legal Services and the Ministry of Justice, possibly as a result of
    my exposure to organophosphates.

    I now have a copy of this report, however, the report is marked as follows:

    LEONARD LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED
    TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Professor Gordon Turnbull identifies the retriggering of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
    arising out of events some 20 years earlier in 1984. Professor Gordon Turnbull writes within his
    2006 medical report that he has known me since 1997. Prior to this date Air Vice-Marshal Patrick
    O’Connor FRCPsych dealt with incidents in 1991 and the re-triggering of PTSD.

    In March 2013 an incident occurred (that in 2020 is still unfolding) this time a PTSD specialist whose
    background, like myself, is Royal Navy intervened. He is one of the very few officers that one can
    speak freely with, without fear of prosecution under the Official Secrets Act 1911-1989. My primary
    PTSD trigger is now believed to have occurred in 1975 whilst I was in the Royal Navy.

    The bullying by some within Government Legal Services, that again started in March 2013 stopped
    suddenly in September 2013. The reason for this bullying is now known and those responsible now
    identified, including His Honour Judge Simon Oliver !

    In 2016 a Deputy Assistant Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service,
    dealt with a matter swiftly.

    Every few weeks I am visited by a Government Services PTSD specialist whose identity also cannot
    be disclosed. He also treated Captain Simon Hayward (Life Guards) following his false imprisonment
    in a Swedish prison. He also treats other servicemen and women free of charge !!

    He and one other drove me to the appointment with the Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox Q.C. Attorney General
    for England and Wales. Since that meeting in late 2018 with the Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox Q.C. the bullying
    had stopped.

    However, as Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver, Government Legal Services, and Matrix Chambers’
    wish to resurrect picking on the ‘little people’ and like so many other servicemen and women again
    facing homelessness I have asked for assistance.

    Richard Anelay QC:
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that you were a patient and
    subject to the Court of Protection”.

    [District Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation]

    Only in August 2019 did Thames Valley Police released information that identified they had known of
    the failure of BP Collins Solicitors and others to disclose my protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence
    22 June 2020
    ——————————————————————————
    Len,
    The incident you discussed with me the other day, you know what it was, so will not discuss here
    as these days nobody can trust any Government departments or police! What occurred may well
    be defined as a severe traumatic event, where other’s lives including your own were in imminent
    danger, complicated further by what you had to do. Then suffering the after-effects from those
    released later. This action in 1975 may well have triggered a traumatic reaction that was not
    addressed at the time, but triggered later by what you stated (the door) by Police!
    You know what I mean.
    …..

  140. Leonard

    Pre-written judgements !!!

    The Organophosphate Poisoning litigation (OP)

    Legal firms involved represented Gulf War Syndrome cases, Organophosphate poisoning cases
    (including Sheep Dip poisoning), and vaccine damage cases. All involved government which had
    reason to defend such cases against the plaintiffs.

    Gulf War and OP cases were instructed to take part in a so-called pilot study with the claim that
    it would obtain evidence of causation but there was no peer reviewed science to support that
    proposition, even though some of the tests presented a considerable risk to those taking part.
    The Pilot Study was never completed.

    Initially, there were over 1,000 legal cases heading for court but the lawyers managed to reduce
    the numbers first to about 30 and then to just 13. Lawyers for the plaintiffs failed to present vital
    supporting evidence to the court during pre-trial hearings and failed to challenge false statements
    introduced by the defendants. Judges were informed of perjury and perversion of justice but failed
    to act on that information.

    Eventually government funded legal aid was withdrawn from all those groups leaving them with
    no way to prove their cases. None of those cases ever reached the stage of trial in open court in the
    UK, even though many involved serious ill-health caused by employer negligence.

    The various judgements and appeal judgements could not have been more favourable to the
    defendants had they written them themselves.

    The government also has control over Industrial Injury legislation and its officers have control
    over the decision making process for every case. As in the OP litigation officials of government
    introduce false evidence and ignore all supporting evidence in order to deny illnesses caused by
    the poisons.

    Even to the level of judicial Review vital internationally accepted evidence is ignored and legal
    representation is denied.

    Judges sent masses of supporting evidence, and evidence of corrupt practices, can ignore it all,
    even scientifically proven medical opinion, but amazingly appear to have a miraculous ability
    to prepare long written judgements whilst at the same time dealing in court with other complex
    financial and property cases.

    The speed with which they can produce written judgements in which they carefully ignore all
    evidence and precedents to protect the defence is truly remarkable.

    Disgracefully the OP litigation was allowed to set a precedent causing the required “Balance of
    Probabilities” standard of proof required in Civil Cases to be replaced by the almost impossible
    Scientific Standards of proof of causation as required in criminal cases – beyond any doubt.

    Because all poisons mimic natural diseases the defendants are now protected from liability
    litigation in the UK for the harm their products cause.

    Dark Waters

  141. Dear Dark Waters

    Are these details posted anywhere online besides here please?

  142. The judiciary is not independent of government or the monarchy. Why wasn’t Prince Charles called to give evidence in the Diana death case? All three components of this triad are corrupt and self-serving and I don’t think they are going to get away with it for much longer. Blood is likely to be spilled and, the way things are going out there, the blood baths have already started. They abuse their power and the people have absolutely had enough of these dangerous organised criminals.

  143. pgm@berkspgl.org.uk

    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons
    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road, Sindlesham
    Wokingham, Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Dear W Bro Howlett-Bolton,

    Re: Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Over the last few weeks, I have been contacted by freemasons wanting to know what has occurred to
    me. Their ranks range from Master Mason through to Senior London Grand Rank, and Provincial
    Grand Rank. Some plan to visit me after lockdown.

    Their occupations include Police Service, Armed Forces, and Government Services, many of whom
    have now retired. They wanted to know whether I had sufficient food etc, and did I need any
    money.

    An officer, Senior London Grand Rank, wants to know why I resigned from freemasonry after 30 years.
    Perhaps those below may care to explain:

    The Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    The Former Provincial Grand Secretary David Keys, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  144. The reply from:

    The Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Rachel Holmes
    Tue 23/06/2020 09:28

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    Thank you for your email.
    Your email relates to a case in which Mr Silverstone is instructed on behalf of the Claimant,
    to whom he owes professional obligations which mean that it would not be appropriate to
    respond to your query.

    Yours sincerely

    Rachel Holmes
    —————————————————————————-
    Leonard Lawrence Pilot says:
    June 20, 2020 at 11:24 pm

    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 21 June 2020 00:20
    To: rachel holmes@matrixlaw
    Cc: fraud@ukfraudreport.co.uk

    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms. Holmes,

    Please would you inquire with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of the
    specific allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence)
    in paragraphs 52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement, prior to barrister
    Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within paragraphs 52. and 53 can
    be identified, if required.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc

  145. courtofprotection.reading.countycourt@justice.gov.uk. (Court of Protection)

    The Court of Protection, Reading County Court, Reading,
    Berkshire.

    Circuit Judges
    Last updated: 8 July 2019
    Name: His Honour Judge Oliver / Circuit South Eastern / Date of appointment 05/10/2010

    Chukwuma Uju | Judicial Appointments (Pre-Appointments) Advisor & Swearing-in Officer |
    Judicial Office for England & Wales | 10th Floor Thomas More Building | Royal Courts of Justice
    | Strand | WC2A 2LL |

    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    Thank you for your e-mail of 17 March, in which you asked for the following information from the
    Ministry of Justice (MoJ): “Would you be so kind as to advise me of the date that His Honour Judge
    Simon Oliver, DFJ Reading County Court, was appointed a ticketed Court of Protection judge?

    I can confirm that the department holds information that you have asked for, and I am pleased to
    provide this to you. His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on
    7 October 2015

    Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Head of the Government Legal Profession.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has sound reasons to discredit me.

    A Section 9 Family Judge does not automatically hold a Court of Protection authorisation. There is
    a period from around 2011 until 7 October 2015 when His Honour Judge Oliver was of the mistaken
    belief that he could hear Court of Protection cases.

    My Court of Protection Appeal was heard by HHJ Simon Oliver on the 16 April 2012 !

    THERE COULD BE HUNDREDS, EVEN A THOUSAND CASES LIKE MINE IN BERKSHIRE

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  146. The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP
    Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury, Minister for the Civil Service, and
    Minister for the Union

    WEBSITE: HHJ SIMON OLIVER judges behaving badly

    Throughout history, many of the men and women who went to war came home and their skills
    were adapted to help the civilian governments. Ex-military became police, firemen, paramedics,
    security guards, prison guards, other government jobs including the Security Services, MIS, MI5
    and SIS.

    It was also too common, that these people who had risked their lives serving their country and
    protecting others’ lives were treated poorly. Some were also exposed to, and implicated in the
    skulduggery that secretive agencies have.

    All of this was relatively common knowledge and tolerated to quite a high degree because of the
    glorification of the noble ‘vigilante’, and the ease of government cover-ups.

    Around five years ago, I recall reading that the United States of America gave warning to the
    United Kingdom Government. They said that the greatest threat to the United Kingdom came
    not from terrorism, but from former members of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces. These were people,
    deeply unhappy at how they and the public have and are being treated.

    For many years I personally have been fighting to expose serious corruption in police and courts.
    Not surprisingly, on reflection, the greatest assistance that I have received has come from police
    officers with an H.M. Armed Forces background! Including those that have attained the rank of
    Chief Constable, Assistant Commissioner and Assistant Chief Constable.

    As well as my own case and a big handful of individual cases that I know of notably in the Thames
    Valley Police Area, there has been maltreatment across various groups of ex-services people.

    Sunday the 17 January 2017
    Royal British Legion calls on Government to help on Gulf War illness.
    53,462 members of the British Arm Forces were deployed.
    33,000 UK veterans estimated to be suffering from Gulf War illness.

    March 2014 A findings paper by HM Inspectorate of Prisons
    The highest proportions of ex-Service personnel were located in high security prisons and category B
    training prisons (13% each)

    This is not the information the UK government wants people to hear. Some in government cover these
    things up. They do their smoke and mirrors, and use the bizarre obfuscation and avoidance of answers
    that is now the trademark of SOME politicians.

    The Attorney General, The. Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC was briefed in person in October 2018 what had
    occurred to me, when in February 2013 HHJ Simon Oliver was told by Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley to
    re-transfer my case to the Court of Appeal. The. Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC has provided me with the
    legal mechanism to set aside all judgments and court Orders that were placed upon me.

    I called on other ex-services people, to whistleblow and to expose the corruption by some, but not all,
    within the police and justice system. This request has and still is being answered by many including
    some Freemasons.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  147. Leonard Lawrence Pilot and Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts

    Written by ministryofjustice on July 1, 2012.

    6 October 2011
    Boeing Aircraft Company
    Settle claim for neurotoxins in aircraft cabin air, in a case filed in the United States of America.

    4 July 2005
    Leonard Lawrence 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT
    identified Toxic Cabin Air and Organophosphate poisoning.

    No evidence exists that this report was ever disclosed to Slough and Reading County Court by solicitor
    Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

  148. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    30 August 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, is entirely satisfied by the non disclosure of the
    1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT and Court of Protection, Medical Reports by the
    Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts and solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe
    Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading.

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, is also entirely satisfied that Leonard Lawrence interests were fully and
    fairly protected by the Official Solicitor and solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors
    Reading by the non disclosure of the 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT. Others do
    not support His Honour Judge Oliver,

    Law Society investigating Solicitor report dated 30 September 2009.
    Disclosed 2011
    The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater
    duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr Lawrence feel should have been taken
    to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision
    and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection.

    24 August 2011 Law Society, Legal Services,
    Disclose correspondence sent by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection on 20 July
    2010 Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

    The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504-2008. “Issues raised by
    Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate
    areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable
    adult”.

  149. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    FROM:
    Dr Vanessa Davies, Director, Bar Standards Board

    We do not have any powers to make Mr Brazil, Mr Allen answer your queries.
    (Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk and Nicholas Allen)
    .
    The current Official Solicitor (Mr Pitblado) wrote to the Bar Standards Board on 24 June 2009.

    In his letter he explained that the point had not been reached at which the Court of Protection
    should have been notified of the existence of the CP3.

    As the Bar Standards Board was entitled to do, we took views of the Official Solicitor Mr Pitblado.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.

    Dr Vanessa Davies, Director, Bar Standards Board
    QUOTE
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.

  150. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    As this website has the attention of the following:
    Ministry of Justice
    Treasury Solicitors
    Police
    Matrix Chambers and many others in the UK and abroad, let us continual.

    24 August 2011
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection;
    Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

  151. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Hospital Medical Director Report reference:
    Leonard Lawrence He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity.
    During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem,
    three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not registered
    with the Court of Protection.

    He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to
    the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing.

  152. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215)

    In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation
    claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care.

  153. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220)

    At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the
    harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence…. His story was one of costly legal battles to prove
    that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit.

    What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of
    the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in
    not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle
    those culpable.

    [those culpable include the following].
    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.
    Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk
    Barrister Nicholas Allen QC 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser OGR Stock Denton LLP
    Solicitor Sarah B Belfield (Reading Berkshire)

  154. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Director of the Neuropsychology Toxicology Unit London University College London.
    Date: Sat, 5 May 2012
    Subject: Re: FW: Neurotoxins

    Dear Len,

    Thank you for the update – I hope you are OK? –

    I hope the hospital consultants can help you. I would be happy to talk to them if you think that
    would be helpful. I would be very interested to know how you get on in the future so please keep
    in touch if you can?

    Best wishes,

  155. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Consultant Haematologist
    Dear Mr Lawrence
    I am sorry that we will not be able to accept you as a donor. This is because of your history of
    organophosphate poisoning that has left you with ongoing nervous system problems.

    Consultant Haematologist

  156. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Dear Len,
    Thank you for keeping me updated and of new matters arising concerning OPs. I have as promised been
    circulating to various media agencies what you permitted me to do. My wish is that sooner rather than
    later someone is GOING TO TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY or are we again going to suffer another PTSD sage.

    A diagnosis put up in the DSM II in 1968 then ignored entirely until the Americans decided to name another
    illness with all the criteria of Reactive depression into PTSD in 1980 called the DSM IV. One wonders if a
    deliberate and orchestrated campaign is again being waged against such people. Since the Hillsborough
    Disaster when to Police officers witnessing that incident unfolding knew things were wrong.

    A cover up by Police, Lawyers and all and sundry. An absolute disgrace by all named that has caused so
    much heart ache, distress to so many bereaved families. This has now been confirmed by families NOT
    GIVING IN to deceptions.

    My one wish again is that by individuals like yourself NEVER GIVE IN, but stand resolute and strong in
    bringing down these corrupt and deceitful persons who were responsible for all your hurt and pain too.

    Rest assured I am alongside you in exposing this unlawful and criminal activity.

    Take care my friend,
    xxxxxxx
    (Royal Navy)

  157. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light

    Professor of Psychiatry
    Dear Leonard,
    Good to hear from you. I hope you’re feeling well. Thanks also for the report.
    Things seem to be moving now.

    Best wishes,
    Go Bravely
    (RAF)

  158. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light. [including WBro HHJ Simon Oliver]

    Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence,

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey Court of Protection,
    Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  159. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Principal Registry of the Family Division From:
    eliot.webster@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk To: bae146@hotmail.co.uk
    Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:00:33 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    The appeal application needs to be lodged with the Court of Protection.
    They are based in the Thomas More Building at the Royal Court of Justice
    (switchboard number is 020 7947 6000). You will also require leave to appeal, unless HHJ Simon Oliver
    granted this and this need to be included in the appeal. The Court of Protection Act 2007, Rules 172 & 175
    will assist you. The file, in the first instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection.
    I hope this information assists.

    Kind Regards,

  160. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Eliot Webster Principal Registry of the Family Division
    Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:13:01 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge

    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    I referred the matter to the Senior District Judge, District Judge Waller, who informed me of the details
    I provided you in the e-mail which I sent you yesterday at 14:01. I suggest that the appeal is issued before
    the file is transferred to the Court of Protection. I hope the above information assists.

    Kind Regards,
    Eliot Webster
    Principal Registry of the Family Division

  161. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Acting Senior Master Leslie
    Queen’s Bench Division
    Royal Courts of Justice.

    ” There is leave to issue this claim against the Official Solicitor.”

    Acting Senior Master Leslie Quote: “ disgraceful”

  162. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Mr Anelay QC
    Deputy High Court Judge, Family Division,
    Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk
    informs Leonard Lawrence that barrister Mr Dominic Brazil had informed Mr Anelay QC that
    Leonard Lawrence had been a patient and subject to the Court of Protection

  163. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Compliance and Regulatory Manager Keith Watts
    Compliance and Regulatory Unit,
    Office of the Public Guardian Ref CSCU516/08
    The Court of Protection has no record of any application being received for you.
    It was clearly the responsibility of the holder of the medical certificate to ensure an application was
    made.

    Martin John.
    Chief Executive and the Public Guardian letter.
    It would have been the responsibility of the certificate holder to make an application to the Court
    of Protection.

  164. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    The Law Society Solicitor Disclosed 2011.
    As acknowledged by the firm, (solicitor Sarah B, Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading)
    it had Mr Lawrence sign forms when he clearly lacked capacity.

    The Law Society Solicitor.
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504.
    The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the
    greater duty to protect him. I consider majority of the steps Mr Lawrence feels should have been taken
    to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision
    and action necessary to invoke the protection of the Court of Protection

    The Law Society,
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504.
    “Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis
    that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an
    extremely vulnerable adult”.

  165. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    —————————————————————————————
    Email NAllen@29bedfordrow.co.uk 05 August 2005 10.30

    From Nicholas Allen To Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk

    Subject: Lawrence

    As requested. I have simply “accepted all” the tracked changes.

    I haven’t fully checked what effect this has had on the draft order, but hope that it is sufficient for
    your purposes

    Best Wishes!

    Nick
    ——————————————————————————-
    25 August 2010
    Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    I am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to DJ Fortgang that the Official
    Solicitor (Laurence Oades) agreed that the house be sold for 622,000.”
    ——————————————————————————-
    Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office,
    “The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.”
    ——————————————————————————–

  166. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Detective Chief Superintendent Russ Middleton,
    Crime and Justice Department
    Devon & Cornwall Police

    Dear Mr Lawrence
    I can confirm that no Court of Protection Certificates were released to us by the Law Society, therefore
    no certificates were passed to Thames Valley Police when they took on the investigation.

  167. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE
    4/10/06 District Judge Jones
    Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice
    proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no knowledge
    of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the ancillary relief application.
    My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill for assessment.(2006) I cannot find
    the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified myself from everything, that would include
    the legal aid assessment.

    On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four hearings
    that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself.

    Mr. Lawrence was certified under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and a patient subject to the Court of
    Protection. Distrist Judge Jones was not a authorised Court of Protection judge.

  168. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE 4/10/06
    District Judge Jones
    Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice
    proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no
    knowledge of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the
    ancillary relief application. My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill
    for assessment.(2006) I cannot find the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified
    myself from everything, that would include the legal aid assessment.

    On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four
    hearings that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself.

    Mr. Lawrence was certified under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and was a patient subject to the
    Court of Protection. District Judge Jones did not hold a Court of protectin authorisation.

  169. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    JF/LAW/130835 Corporate Legal Team. Legal Service Commission cannot lawfully grant funding to
    an individual if they are not financially eligible.

    The LSC Manual, Volume 2 Part F Pages 298 to 303. CLSMEANS1 identifies Mr. Lawrence had been
    £331,622 over the eligibility limit

    In 2008/9 Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
    and barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, attempted to gain a Civil Restraint Order
    against Leonard Lawrence.

    This was stopped by Her Honour Judge Ann Campbell, His Honour Judge Elly and District Judge Kathryn
    McCulloch. BP Collins Solicitors and Dominic Brazil of Counsel had also failed to disclose to the court a
    Certificate of Mental Incapacity they held under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 that was issued to
    safeguard Leonard Lawrence at Slough County Court

  170. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    APPLICATION FOR CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER BY SOLICITOR SUSAN ANDREWS
    District Judge McCulloch “It’s not going to happen”

    28 August 2008
    Solicitor Susan Andrews BP Collins Solicitors
    “This is an application that is likely to come to £4000”

    District Judge McCulloch
    “You have only written two letters”

    Slough County Court March 2009
    District Judge McCulloch
    “It’s not going to happen”

    District Judge McCulloch dismissed Susan Andrews and BP Collins Solicitors fee’s of nearly £15,000.

  171. I don’t want to detract from the conversation, but merely to ADD to it. The corruption runs deep. We already know that the Official Solicitor, Alastair Pitblado, was named by the Metropolitan Police. They allege that he contacted them and told them to “make life difficult for Mr. Lawrence”. They also advised him that they were not going to do so.

    However, we also know that the DWP and HMRC simultaneously took steps to accuse Mr. Lawrence of fraud and tax evasion, and to cut him off his benefits, leaving him without the means to support life. He was evicted onto the street. This happened at the same time as the phone call from Pitblado. However, we have information to suggest that someone who is not yet dead was also involved.

    We also know that “somebody” burned his house down while he was still in it.

    So here is a link that will help everyone get an all-round picture of what is going on in the UK. This has to stop. If Oliver isn’t stopped then we will all be coming after those above him. It mentions officials who are using organised crime to do their dirty work.

    Watch this.

    Expect us.

  172. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    May Maughan, The Deputy Official Solicitor:

    “We are not prepared to answer any further queries and your correspondence in future, whether by
    e-mail, hard copy letter, or telephone, will not be answered, nor acknowledged.
    Yours sincerely
    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor Office of the Official Solicitor and Public Trustee
    Tel: 020 7911 7121 – may.maughan@offsol.gsi.gov.uk

    Only when after six years had elapsed and May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor was of the belief
    that Leonard Lawrence was out of time to bring a claim for damages did Simpson Millar LLP solicitors
    apply for, and May Maughan release, previously undisclosed documents from Leonard Lawrence case
    files.

    On the 20 April 2012 Paul Hicks a solicitor with Simpson Millar LLP informed Leonard Lawrence that
    on disclosure of Leonard Lawrence files from the Official Solicitors office, May Maughan, Deputy Official
    Solicitor in a telephone conversation had admitted liability for Leonard Lawrence non registration with
    the Court of Protection by SOLICITOR Helen Clift.

    How Simpson Millar LLP could represent Leonard Lawrence since 2008 without gaining his case files is
    unknown.

    The documents St Philips Chambers had sought could not be found on inspection of the Official Solicitors
    files in March 2012 at Simpson Millar LLP office. Photos taken show pages having been torn out of files.
    Some of what was found is detailed below Alistair Pitblado, Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court
    submission to the Bar Standards Board dated 24 June 2009 identified that the court was not told by his
    solicitors that Court of Protection CP3’s had been processed, that psychiatrists had identified that Mr.
    Lawrence required the Court of Protection, and that Mr. Lawrence interests must be protected.

    a) Rosemary Sanders (Solicitor at OS) 27 June 2005 email Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Once we have
    a satisfactory CP3 we can apply to the Court of Protection for authority to sign a release of his rights
    of occupation… this would have to be supported by a court order dealing with the property. As matters
    stand the psychiatrist has completed a CP3.

    b) James Beck (Solicitor at OS) 1 August 2005 I spoke to Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Obviously, the
    sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority.

    c) Piper, Steve (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 I said that the OS would send the form to the Court of
    Protection who would make the appropriate order.

    d) Clift, Helen (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 To: Piper, Steve (OSPT)
    Subject: RE: Mr Lawrence
    ok essentially it should allow the solicitors to release to him the funds they are holding.

    The paper trail of the Stephen Piper and Helen Clift office of the Official Solicitor sending the form to
    the Court of Protection to make the appropriate order has not been found.

    Helen Clift made the financial decisions not Laurence Oades the former Official Solicitor.

    Records identify Helen Clift failed to disclose to two District Judges and His Honour Judge Elly the need
    for the Court of Protection.

    Helen Clift had also given the instructions to gain Leonard Lawrence signature on legal aid forms.
    —————————————————————————–
    HHJ SIMON OLIVER !!!

    HHJ Simon Oliver writes at point 27 on his Judgement “H says that his counsel, at the hearing on
    18th August 2005, says that the Official Solicitor did not agree the sale of the fmh at £622,000.
    However, there is no evidence of this”.

    HHJ Simon Oliver has clearly not read the following information:

    RDG Solicitors notes 18 August 2005 disclosed 2012:-
    Barrister Simon Calhaem
    “wife has accepted an offer and has exchanged contracts without recourse to the Official Solicitor”

    Barrister Simon Calhaem “wife is in breach of the order by not agreeing the sale price,”

    A SEARCH OF READING COUNTY COURT FOUND THAT THE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAD THE ABOVE
    RECORDS AVAILABLE TO HIM

  173. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Mr. A. Wilson FRCS FFAEM FRCS (Consultant Surgeon) Clinical Director Royal London Hospital
    Mr. A. Wilson FRCS, Dr McGhee FFARCS, Dr Murray and Mr. Edmond all had been considered unsuitable
    to act as guardian ad litem by District Judges at Slough County Court.

  174. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of Neurobiology
    (Paid for by British Airline Pilots Association)
    Tau and MBP suggest the presence of moderate brain injury.
    Consistent with chemical –induced nervous system injury.

    Professor Ramsden, Cranfield University Workshop
    Leonard Lawrence invited to talk about his medical history and the failure of the legal system to protect him.

    PRESS RELEASE 1 November 2011.
    Ref UK Department of Transport “Aircraft Cabin Air Sampling Study”
    This report actually found significant concentration of organophosphate neurotoxins and other noxious
    substances in cabin air even under normal flying conditions.

  175. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor advised that she not make available to the Queens Bench
    Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Court of Protection Medical
    Certificates CP3′s and other certificates of mental incapacity issued under Part V11 Mental Health Act
    1983 that were not disclosed to the courts by Helen Clift a solicitor within the office of the Official Solicitor

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor advised that her office does not hold copies of the case files of
    the external legal representatives Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors, Reading, Berks who were appointed
    by the Official Solicitor.

    May Maughan personally sent part of Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors files to Simpson Millar LLP
    Bristol on the 20 March 2012 that included the disclosure of a notebook from which pages had been
    cut out.

    The notes of the conference held at 29 Bedford Row Chambers prior to the Final Hearing that Mr Day
    of counsel had sought have still not been disclosed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court.

    Whilst May Maughan Deputy Official Official Solicitor finds the assistance afforded to Mr Lawrence
    by the police amusing, a Chief Constables Office directed the case to a Detective Chief Superintendant
    this enabled Mr Lawrence to recover May Maughans correspondence to the Law Society and the Law
    Societies internal files.

    The Law Societies internal files directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence
    with the Court of Protection.

    To be blunt the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) files identifies that SRA case worker Laura Markham
    and others within the SRA did not believe May Maughan the Deputy Official Solicitor submission neither
    did the SRA appointed investigating solicitor.

  176. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Counsel written opinion supports the Law Society internal report and directs liability at the Official
    Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection at the material time.

    In a video recorded with Barbara Hewson at Hardwicke Chambers, Ms Hewson accused the Official
    Solicitors office of several human rights violations against Mr Lawrence, this video was made available
    at the Cranfield Workshop in October 2011.

    Ms Hewson view was supported by other lawyers and expanded upon in the Journal of Biological Physics
    and Chemistry ISSN 1512-0856.

  177. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    16 April 2012
    Mr. Day, St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    Advised HHJ Simon Oliver of the following:

    FINAL ORDER OF D.J. FORTGANG IS NOT VALID AS IT HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION.

    According to solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors, my barrister Mr Day recieved an angery
    phone call from WBr HHJ Simon Oliver the next day and Mr Day withdrew from my case !!

    I was also told to pay £10,000

  178. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]
    ——————————————————————————–
    HM Procurator General,
    HAD HHJ SIMON OLIVER HELD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION
    IN 2012 HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT PERMISSION TO APPEAL UNDER PART V11 OF THE MENTAL
    HEALTH ACT 1983 IS NOT REQUIRED !! HE WOULD HAVE SAVED THE GOVERNMENT A SUM IN THE
    REGION OF £500,000 POUNDS.

    4 August 2005 NICHOLAS ALLEN 29 Bedford Row London WC1 4HE
    Counsel for the Official Solicitor
    Skeleton Argument 6)
    (a) it is not believed that Mr. Edmond has been authorized by the Court of Protection
    under Part V11 of the Mental Health Act 1983(FPR9.2(7)(b) para.15

    ———————————————————————————-
    Lord Justice Ward [2009] EWCA Civil 1122 Marco Pierre White –and- Withers LLP 29th October 2009
    Comment by Lord Justice Ward

    63. The Family Division’s practice to admit all relevant evidence in the search for truth or to impose
    sanctions where there has been improper conduct.

    67. Furthermore, it must always be remembered that solicitors are officers of the court and if they
    are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. It is not conducive to the
    administration of justice that such claims are simply swept under the carpet. It is in the public interest
    that the bounds of proper conduct be clarified. Leonard Lawrence

  179. Let’s be clear on what is taking place in the courts. Criminals with law degrees are racketeering with other criminals, including transnational organised crime. It is taking place in all the courts, and Simon Oliver is not the only one involved.

    The original court documents illustrated in the following publication and the text illustrate exactly how these HIGH LEVEL AND VERY SERIOUS ORGANISED crimes are being committed, and deliberately corrupt process is being applied in the court itself IN THOUSANDS OF CASES for the purpose of stealing people’s assets – UNDER THE RADAR YET IN PLAIN SIGHT.

    https://www.lulu.com/shop/brad-meyer/the-forensics-of-legal-fraud-v1r3/paperback/product-15543775.html

    “Brace yourself and imagine that your are about to enter a British world that is operating outside the Rule of Law. Famed and honoured in prior centuries for sourcing Magna Carta, the United Kingdom is poised this century to become famous for housing systematic, intentional contravention of its own rules.

    Join one man’s journey along an audit trail of fraud, as he identifies forged documents and perjured statements leading to the bankrupting of his family and their ongoing financial arrest that continues to this day. Along the way, you’ll learn some of the red flags of fraud that your adversaries can use against you.

    If you are wealthy, these are especially crucial for you to know. If you are protecting the wealthy, then you need to raise your awareness of what’s going on around you. If you are, instead, a participant in the institutionalised process of asset stripping wealthy targets in England, then this book itself will be your red flag that the game is up and your days are numbered.”
    Brad Meyer, Author

    WHAT HAS ANY LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY COURTS – OR ANY COURT, OR SUCCESSIVE MINISTERS OF JUSTICE DONE ABOUT IT?

    MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHY HAVE THEY NOT DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT? i WILL LEAVE THAT TO YOUR IMAGINATION.

  180. Anyone who has a single doubt about the above version of events, should consider for a moment why the
    above named, senior legal professionals have not taken action to protect the integrity of their professional
    name and competency? (not a single one of them) After all personal brand is paramount in the service industry
    and for many of those named, this site appears on page one of a google search for their name.

    It’s not like they wouldn’t have the finances, time and professional ability to take action. So maybe they fear something else, like only proving Mr Lawrence’s case for him?

    There but for the grace of chance go all of us, when catastrophic failings of both the legal system and the
    diagnostic health system occur.

    May Justice find you soon Leonard.

  181. From a Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank

    If only all of the above were the whole story…

    Len lost his Pilot medical and could not continue flying – this was due to organophosphate poisoning
    due to a known problem with toxic additives use in aviation oils – Cases in Australia and the United States
    were settled long ago re this, but not in the UK.

    His wife Nicola started divorce proceedings (around 70% of those with Acquired Brain Injury are divorced
    by their spouse)

    Len’s was admitted to the Cygnet Healthcare Godden Clinic and was incorrectly diagnosed/medicated.
    Medication and incorrect treatment continued in the NHS for years to follow. Five Court of Court
    incapacitation certificates were issued but the legal advisers failed as was their legal duty to register
    them with the Court of Protection.

    His house was sold unlawfully without the Court of Protection consent – a matter which all legal advisers
    were aware should not be done and a derisory settlement made to Len with considerable adverse financial
    inferences made against him by a district judge – John Fortgang in Slough who should not of made any
    order as he was not appointed by the Court of Protection.

    Another Judge – Jones disqualified herself from any dealings in the matter but then continued to make
    judgements against her own order disqualifying herself.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield, Radcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors in Reading were reprimanded by the Law
    Society and the maximum compensation awarded to Len – but even this was derisory amount £600.

    Len was subsequently referred to Professor Gordon Turnbull a consultant to the Civil Aviation Authority
    who made a correct diagnosis, and Len got on the road to recovery – a very long one.

    Every legal party to this event has tried to suppress Len, including Simon Oliver and quite frankly one
    should consider they should all be held liable for Len’s substantial losses and compensation.

    The gravity of this matter is such that it needs attention in the highest court in the land. I would suggest
    that a most senior high court judge be appointed to review this case in conjunction with the attorney general

    Good luck Len not all freemasons are like Simon Oliver.

  182. Thank you for this. Even the Old Bailey will make no difference. It will be just as corrupt.

    What is happening in the UK is actually “crimes against humanity” There is absolutely no justice to be had. There is NO remedy to justice in the UK. Corrupt all the way through and the UK is on the brink of financial collapse according to Andrew Bailey of the Bank of England.

    Watch the rats leave the sinking ship after they are the ones who rammed a hole in the side of it for decades.

    Numerous judges are corrupt. The Metropolitan Police has a list of corrupt judges, compiled around the same time as Operation Tiberius. BUT THEN SO DO WE. They are working with organised crime.

    Regardless, if there are honest judges out there, they are obligated by law to speak up about what they know. Speak up now or we expose you next.

    We are reliably informed that judges around the world are studying this website. I don’t know of anyone who can say they have been treated fairly in the British courts. The devastation that corrupt judges, solicitors, and barristers have caused is beyond belief.

    Sorry Kenneth Clarke, but your dream of making the UK the litigation capitol of the universe is not going to happen. NOBODY will be bringing their cases to the UK courts by the time we have finished – unless some action is taken now against Simon Oliver and his cronies in the Ministry of Justice..

    All the time, the President of the Family Court and the Lord Chief Justice are keeping their heads down. Well, if they don’t lift them up and some take action, we will make sure their heads will roll before it is time to take the donkey to the church.

    Absolute total institutionalised corruption………………AND IT IS NOT JUST ONE,BUT THOUSANDS.

    The gig’s up.

  183. Well,

    They certainly picked on the wrong one

    Howlett-Bolton, if he didn’t know what a piece of snot oliver is, certainly does now.

    He also now knows that sometimes, “14 little people” have some interesting friends and acquaintances
    that can make life a little hot.

    Nice shot across the bows of the brotherhood; they now know your cannons are primed and if necessary,
    ready for a broadside.

  184. That these public servants continue to function ‘beyond authority’ for so long and cover each others’
    backs just goes to show how brave people like Leonard are. Fighting against all the odds, the truth will out.
    Stick with it Len, more good folk are becoming aware.

  185. Exactly. They have all acted IN COMMON PURPOSE to commit fraud, including Legal Aid fraud by the sound of it.

  187. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]
    ——————————————————————————-
    St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    55 Temple Row,
    Birmingham B2 5LS,
    United Kingdom

    Counsel advice on Leonard Lawrence funded by The Legal Serviced Commission, Special Cases Unit.

    Mr. Lawrence had the protection of the Official Solicitor but was not registered as a protected party
    should be in the Court of Protection.

    Left financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order of sale

    Serious procedural error.
    ——————————————————————————–
    9 September 2010
    Mr Richard Anelay QC
    Deputy High Court Judge, Family Division,
    Head of Chambers
    1 Kings Bench Walk, Temple, London, EC4Y 7DB

    Richard Anelay QC writes:
    Barrister Dominic Brazil had informed Mr. Anelay QC that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient and
    subject to the Court of Protection when he (Dominic Brazil) had placed Hundreds of Thousands of
    Pounds in costs and adverse inferences upon Leonard Lawrence by not disclosing the Court of
    Protection Medical Certificates to the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————
    On the 16 April 2012, the above case came before Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver,
    (It is now known that WBr HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation)

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    THE JUDGE: Well it actually says so in the Offical Solicitors guide
    MR DAY: It does
    THE JUDGE: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————
    Eight years later and Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has still to comply with the instructions
    of Mrs Justice Pauffley and make the re-transferring order to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    The Barristers Chambers of Nicholas Frances QC and Stephen Cobb QC [now Mr Justice Nicholas Frances
    QC and Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC, Family Division] had both identified that I was a patient subject to
    the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————–
    30 August 2012 WBr HHJ Simon Oliver falsely alleges that there is no evidence that barrister Simon
    Calhaem from the now-former Chambers of Nicholas Frances QC attended Reading Court Court and
    advised the court that my home had been sold without the Court of Protection authorisation. That
    evidenced was handed to the now-former Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC.

    Leonard Lawrence

  188. Len

    “Once to every man and nation
    Comes the moment to decide,
    In the strife of truth and falsehood,
    For the good or evil side;”
    James Russell Lowell – As quoted by Rev. Martin Luther King

    “All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed.
    Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
    Arthur Schopenhauer 1788-1860, German philosopher who based his ethics on compassion)

    “It requires courage to utter truth; for the higher Truth lifts her voice, the louder will error
    scream, until its inarticulate sound is forever silenced in oblivion”.
    Mary Baker Eddy, Christian Science.

  189. You’ve got them Len!
    I don’t understand how so many people could have been hurt by the Official Solicitor, had their assests
    stolen away from them and yet they are allowed to continue this fraud and abuse against some of the most
    vulnerable people in our society. No one is above the Law. You’ve got them Len!

  190. Hi Len,

    Are you free to disclose an account of what happened when you met the Attorney General?
    Did you discuss Court of Protection issues or cabin poisoning or a bit of both?

    Is the AG aware of the scale of the frauds?

    No worries if you are unable to divulge

    R

  191. Anonymous says:
    June 24, 2020 at 8:36 pm
    Hi Len,
    Are you free to disclose an account of what happened when you met the Attorney General?
    Did you discuss Court of Protection issues or cabin poisoning or a bit of both?
    Is the AG aware of the scale of the frauds?
    No worries if you are unable to divulge
    R
    ————————————————————————–
    Dear R

    Over the years I have shaken hands with three Attorney General’s for England and Wales

    The first was Gareth Williams QC, Lord Williams of Mostyn
    [Gareth Williams QC had represented me in a matter with a police force in the 1990’s]

    The second Dominic Grieve QC
    [Dominic Grieve QC had written to a police force to investigate a matter of stolen documents,
    had this police force investigated I would not be in this situation now]

    The third Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC
    I am not allowed to divulge the names of who drove me to this meeting. I gave the Rt Hon Geoffery
    Cox QC a very brief summary and handed over copies of documents that the police are not allowed
    to view. I also gave the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC a copy of a document that HHJ Simon Oliver said
    that I could not produce, following a basement search at Reading County Court.

    I informed the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC of the bullying that I had been subjected to and like so many
    other victims having been failed by [some] within the Ministry of Justice. My former colleagues will
    now assist me to resolve matters.

    A later request was made to Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC for assistance on a specific piece of legislation.
    This was made available to me within a few days. The cost to resolve my case would cost less that
    £100.

    With some encouragement from the office of the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC in February 2020 a police
    force disclosed many documents that had been withheld from me.

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Case No: QB/2019/000194
    Javed Shaikh. Mr Shaikh the action taken against you by WBr. Simon Oliver and the Ministry of
    Justice has been closely followed to see what barristers chambers would be used, the name of the
    barrister, and what judges your case would be listed with. Some of those helping you are indeed
    Freemasons and former Freemasons, not everyone approves of WBro HHJ Simon Oliver.

    Who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the financing of this litigation against you?

    judges behaving badly – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER –
    This website has achieved more for the safeguarding of vulnerable persons than Multi-Agency
    Safeguarding Agencies, by bringing victims together. The is a pattern as to what is occurring.

    Now, why was I being told to agree to pay £10,000 following the hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver
    by solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP, Bristol, when I was financed by the Legal Services
    Commission and Mrs Justice Pauffey had instructed HH Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case to
    the Court of Appeal EIGHT YEARS AGO.

    There is something very specific about Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that very few people
    know. Also the continual loss of court recordings.

    Leonard Lawrence
    25 June 2020

  193. Louisa Lloyd-Jones
    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team

    Dear Ms Lloyd Jones

    1. Would you please advise who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the financing of this
    litigation against Mr Javed Sheikh?

    2. Could you advise whether The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice Sir Richard Heaton has
    knowledge of these proceedings?

    3. Why was I not informed of the specific allegations that Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made
    against me (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs 52 and 53 of Mr Justice Julian Knowles Approved
    Judgement, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    4. Whilst the Chief Executive of Matrix Chambers, Ms Homes alleges that Mr Silverstone is instructed
    on behalf of the Claimant, to whom he owes professional obligations, with respect both the Claimant
    [HHJ Simon Oliver] and barrister Benjamin Silverstone have a much higher duty not to knowingly
    mislead the court.

    5. Finally, I invite my Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver to withdraw all false allegations made
    against me in his statement and barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, to inform the
    court accordingly.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  194. Msg for Len….
    Helen is trying to contact you from Helston…(Meeting in London)…for some reason I have the wrong email address!!!

    Can someone let him know I’m trying to make contact please..

    Regards
    Helen

  195. pfd.office@judiciary.uk

    Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    RE: COURT OF PROTECTION READING

    We have located a court transcript of the hearing on the 16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver

    HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation until the 7 October 2015

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER WAS HOLDING FIVE ‘ LIVE’ COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATES,

    The transcript shines a bright light on what has been occurring at behind closed doors at Reading
    County Court with the Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver between 2012 and October 2015 at
    Reading County Court and HHJ Simon Oliver assessment of the role of the Court of Protection.

    The barrister Dominic Brazil had in September 2010 already admitted to a Deputy High Court Family
    Judge that I was a Court of Protection Patient. There is no reference of this by barrister Dominic Brazil.
    However, HHJ Simon Oliver knew.

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    THE JUDGE: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    MR DAY: It does.
    THE JUDGE: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the COP
    MR DAY: It does.

    HHJ Simon Oliver was of the belief that any judge could excise Court of Protection authorisation
    and suggest that the role of the Court of Protection as a rubber-stamping process.

    MR DAY: So that is your rubber stamping. I think that was the word.

    Barrister Dominic Brazil 1KBW fee for the one-hour hearing was £10,000 [ten thousand pounds]

    In August 2019 Thames Valley Police, [coinciding with the retirement of Detective Superintendent
    Gillian Wootton, Head of Specialist Operations and Covert Policing] released documents to me
    identify that barrister Dominic Brazil 1KBW instructing solicitors BP Collins Solicitor had obtained
    a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, that solicitor Graeme S. Fraser had denied the existence of.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division
    Having been told by the Court of Protection he did not hold a Court of Protection nomination. HHJ
    Simon Oliver then proceed to deliver a Court of Protection Judgement.

    pps The transcripts are available of other cases

    ———————————————————————————
    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  196. Hi Len,
    copying wording to you from a consultation paper Land Registry

    Form RR (Deputy appointed under section 16 of the Mental Capacity Act – solely owned property) RESTRICTION:
    No disposition during the lifetime of [name of person who lacks capacity] of the [registered estate] [registered
    charge dated [date]] is to be completed by registration unless made pursuant to an order of the court under the
    Mental Capacity Act 2005. Form SS (Trustee appointed in place of a person who lacks capacity – jointly owned property) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the [registered estate] [registered charge dated [date]] made during
    the lifetime of [name of person who lacks capacity] is to be completed by registration without the written
    consent of the Court of Protection.

  198. Dear judges behaving badly

    WHY DOES BERKSHIRE FREMASONARY CONTINUAL TO PROMOTE WBR HHJ SIMON OLIVER AS
    THE FACE OF FREEMASONRY IN 2020?

    HHJ Oliver’s actions in the Queens Bench Division is only going to fuel the determination of his
    victims and pull more and more people into this. The Judicial Office and Ministry of Justice
    should have invited him to retire and then set about resolving the trail of destruction that he
    has caused to them and their families. BUT THEY WON’T. His victims have nothing to lose.

    11 February 2013 WBr HHJ Simon Oliver was told by Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley to retransfer
    my case to the Court of Appeal. Over 7 years now and I am still waiting for the retransferring
    order to be made.

    When WBr. HHJ Simon Oliver takes action in the Queens Bench Division, against a victim of
    abuse he obtains summary judgement within months !!

    Over 7 years now and I am still waiting for the retransferring order. The difficulty HHJ Simon
    Oliver has to overcome is how to explain why he was conducting Court of Protection cases at
    Reading County Court when he was not authorised to do so over a four year period.

    The Crown Prosecution Service, review of my case has still to be published, their request that I
    visited has still to be actioned. Maybe I should make the statement on this website.

    Starting with the former Chambers of Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC:
    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne. Incapable of legal discussions with the Official Solicitor of any
    solicitor instructed by.

    Thereafter the former Chambers of Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC:
    Barrister Simon Calhaem informing Reading County Court that the Official Solicitor had not
    agreed the sale of my home.

    Leonard Lawrence

  199. Hello Len
    Every door has been slammed in your face as those in authority close rank and deny you the open channels
    which you are entitled to pursue by law. But your resilience and fortitude are gaining momentum my friend
    and once you crack open that chamber of horrors you will lift the lid on an avalanche of corruption from many
    who somehow assumed they were above the law……they will doubtless scarper like a pack of rats.
    D..

  200. Leonard
    From a genuine and truthful Police Officer :-
    I attended a function at the Freemasons’ Hall, and as I entered I saw a detective chief inspector who had served
    with me and was a friend of Phil Cuthbert’s. He was with some other police officers, he shook his head at me and openly made a Masonic sign, indicating that I had betrayed Freemasonry. I was disappointed with his behaviour,
    I had not let the Craft down, it was the crooks who had done that. I was abiding by the oath that I took as a police officer and obviously, to him, that was not acceptable if it involved the Craft. It was this incident that was the final straw for me. I had witnessed obnoxious behaviour by senior and junior police officers, graffiti in police stations, personal threats, intimidation of my wife and friends and ostracism from many colleagues. Now I had Freemasons
    in Freemasons’ Hall publicly denouncing me. I resigned from the Freemasons and now firmly hold the belief that
    the Police Service and Freemasonry should not be allowed to mix.

  202. The issues we investigate are:

    how corruption (judicial and political) has been building over decades;
    how the Justice System and Judiciaries are actually working and performing;
    what is meant by the secret courts, gag orders etc;
    how appeal courts actually work and why should there be a need for a Supreme Court when very few cases make their way there;
    why so many incompetent judges who are ready to abuse their judicial position to protect other judges and colleagues are being appointed and promoted to make money out of the system;
    what is the Government’s interest in using the Justice System to promote its political agenda; and
    why judicial impeachment is necessary to protect the rights of the people.

    We are grateful to the significant and gross mistakes, grandiose and delusional nature, and clear incompetence of Lord Wilson of Culworth, Supreme Court Judge since May 2011. His former colleague Lord Dyson (former Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Division, and former Supreme Court Judge) was forced into early retirement in 2016 with the push from our evidence as sent by correspondence to Her Majesty the Queen.

    Lord Wilson of Culworth was a very poor and wrong choice for a Judge at all court levels. Lord Dyson was an embarrassment to the Judiciary and the first Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Division to be forced to resign by a member of the public. He was the 96th Master of the Rolls.

    Lord Wilson of Culworth is officially known as the most corrupt judge of the 21st Century. His considerable unethical and unlawful involvement in cases not in his court, have caused judges to leave the Judicial System and others are about the leave on their own or be impeached.

    Some of the judges who have been found to have abused their ‘judicial power’ are His Honour Judge Parkes QC (Queen’s Bench and disabled – making him an easy target for other judges to exercise their influence on him), Lady Justice Macur (Court of Appeal and a judge with many hats whose behaviour is very dishonest), Lord Justice Sales (Court of Appeal and a subordinate judge), Her Honour Judge McGowan (Tribunal Judge and puppet Judge for other Judges and Chambers), Lord Justice Ryder (Court of Appeal and President of the Tribunals enjoying a pretend aristocratic life, wearing many hats to satisfy all and lacking knowledge of how the justice system actually is supposed to work),

    Lord Justice McFarlane (Court of Appeal, supporter/adviser/judge of the Church and adviser/supporter of his Wife’s career who pretends to be important and from an aristocratic background only to gain entry in the Royal Family and mislead them), and let’s not forget the ultimate bad judge who caused the most embarrassment to the Justice System and the Conservative Government – the ‘dyslexic and most dishonest’ judge of all times and very good friend of Lord Justice McFarlane – Lady Justice Eleanor King (Court of Appeal and a judge who lied to the Ministry of Justice on her judicial application; cannot read and write properly given her disability and one who also has been holding other employment while acting as a full-time judge contrary to her employment terms and conditions) who was appointed on an application only basis and not on merit.

    We are internationally recognised for our considerable difficult and important cases.

    There’s more…………….

    CHECK OUT THIS WEBSITE IN ITS ENTIRETY: https://web.archive.org/web/20190126231024/http://www.divorceandthecity.co.uk/

  203. Had it been true that Mr. Sheikh threatened Oliver with anthrax like he said, Oliver would have gone to police, and they would have arrested and charged Sheikh. The second issue is that Judge Knowles and Ben Silverstone are connected to the same chambers, which is not allowed.

    Knowles never asked to see the evidence of the anthrax, nor was it offered in the court room. So what on earth kind of judge is Knowles?

    So he is obviously dishonest.

    One person postingon this website has said that Oliver had asked him to put two cheques through his business, totalling 250K pounds, in exchange for cash. I would say this is money laundering.

    All these people talking about Oliver don’t appear to know each other.

    No wonder Oliver wants this website taken down. Too many people know things that could put him behind bars for a very long time.

  204. Has the dyslexic judge Eleanor King been passing Judgments based on a routine basis rather than on a case by case basis?

    Ministry of Justice has no policies in place to help judges with disabilities or take action against those judges who mislead the Ministry only to make a financial and otherwise (privileges) benefits from their judicial role.

    Stay with us for our next story how this dyslexic judge continues to mislead the Ministry of Justice as she holds another job, under her maiden name, besides being a full time judge, under her married name, at the Court of Appeal. She works for a company who pursues “claims against certain third parties in respect of various contractual breaches”. Certain members of the company have been formally charged for criminal activities and the case will be heard this year. Is Eleanor Warwick Hamilton, known as Eleanor King LJ, one of the criminally charged individuals as she has been with the company since 6 April 2006 (its establishment in January 2006)?

    FULL STORY HERE: https://web.archive.org/web/20190515105823/http://www.divorceandthecity.co.uk/lady-justice-eleanor-kings-disability-dyslexia-identified-by-bbc-news-reporting-today/

    What a con artist. Who would trust any judgment she has ever made?

  205. We should be grateful to Simon Oliver. Single handedly, is is bringing down the whole corrupt judiciary. The Queen will be pleased. We are the 99%. We are many. They are few.

  207. I read some documents and heard some information that Simon Oliver is committing Mr Shaikh to prison on the 27th of July 2020 in the high court which will be heard by justice Matthew Nicklin. Matrix chambers, the government legal department, Ben Silverstone or Simon Oliver have not provided any evidence for their case but all that is provided is a Simon Oliver’s affidavit which makes an allegation and we all know an allegation is not evidence. I would advise Mr Shaikh not bother turning up because it seems they are trying to bring harm to him by using a kangaroo court. I find it very interesting that during covid-19 pandemic that the high court is open for committal! to date, Simon Oliver has avoided the jury! I wonder why he is avoiding the jury? Maybe because he knows that a jury would not accept the same evidence and only one of his friends in the High court will
    All in all, just a very sad court case again where the beneficiary is going to be a judge. I think if Mr Shaikh is committed then we should all riot at Oliver’s
    Kind regards

  208. Len didn’t ask for these problems; they were foisted on him by unscrupulous people who knew that they were doing wrong. How many more people are affected thus? How many does Len Lawrence represent? Remember that OPs are damaging the whole population – children and foetuses included. These are our families that are being damaged. Keep up the good work, Len.

  209. Hi Len

    Solicitor Graeme Fraser

    Fraud Act 2006
    CHAPTER 35
    CONTENTS
    Fraud

    1 Fraud
    2 Fraud by false representation
    3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
    4 Fraud by abuse of position

  210. Dear judges behaving badly,

    Mr Justice Moor predetermined judgement

    Here is the predetermined Moor judgement he handed down on the last day of the final hearing after a 4 week trial to discredit me and my case in front of a room full of global media in which he handed the judgement to the media as well.

    Throughout the four week trial Moor ignored most of my evidence and the law, and put reporting restrictions on the media so they could not tell the truth regarding my evidence that was ignored throughout the four week trial. Where the lawyers were hiding behind legal privilege….

    Best Michelle

    https://www.docdroid.net/uKXXArh/3637-pdf

  211. Dear Len,

    I have not yet heard the outcome of the police investigation into criminality by HHJ Simon Oliver.
    I will let you know as soon as I do hear.

    Could you forward this e-mail to the Attorney General’s Office.

    The MOJ have been less than forthcoming on FOIA requests!

    I am trying to discover if Oliver’s claims in 2014 hold any veracity.

    Did Justice Singh (now Rabinder Singh) and another unnamed Court of Appeal Judge appoint him as:

    1. A section 9 Deputy High Court Judge of the Queen’s Bench Division.
    2. President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    3 Did Justice Singh have the Civil Procedure Rules changed so that he could hear and grant extended civil
    restraint orders, as a designated family law judge.

    There does not appear to be any truth in this but I wish to make sure.
    It is, also, only fair to Rabinder Singh to allow him the opportunity to refute the claims.

    There are parallels with your case here; Oliver made court orders which could only be made by the
    Court of Protection.

    Regards

  212. judges behaving badly
    07 December 2018

    Eleven magistrates, two court judges and four tribunal judges had to be removed from office last year for misconduct, according to the annual Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) report.

    Of these dismissals, 12 were serious enough to be dealt with under the summary process, where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Chief Justice can remove an office holder without further investigation due to circumstances such as a criminal conviction, bankruptcy or failure to meet sitting requirements without reasonable excuse.

    Formal reprimands were given to five magistrates, two court judges, one tribunal judge and one coroner.

    In total, 39 judges were subject to disciplinary action last year, compared to 42 in the previous year. The JCIO received roughly the same number of complaints as last year, 2,147 to 2,126 the previous year. The JCIO report covers 23,000 full or part-time judges.

    Many members of the public continue to mistake the JCIO as an alternative means of appeal, submitting complaints about judicial decisions and case management, the report said.

    The JCIO’s performance in terms of meeting its deadlines for responding to complaints suffered last year due to ‘significant staffing shortages’.

    It met its aim of responding to complaints within two days in only 89% of cases, having set a target of doing so in 95% of cases; and of issuing a substantive response within 15 working days in only 66% of cases, somewhat short of its target of doing so in 85% of cases. It attributed this drop in performance to ‘significant staffing shortages’.

    The Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman upheld or partially upheld seven complaints about the JCIO’s handling of complaints (less than 1% of the JCIO’s overall caseload).

    https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/judges-behaving-badly-2

  213. http://www.gov.uk

    “The Attorney General has a duty to ensure that the Queen’s ministers who act in her name, or purport to act in her name, do act lawfully because it is his duty to help to secure the rule of law, the principal requirement of which is that the government itself acts lawfully.” (Lord Mayhew of Twysden)

    “…(Attorney General has) a role to play in Parliament, in government, in assisting the courts, and in defending the rule of law…It is only in a system of government where the rule of law is respected that the law is truly legitimate, and legitimacy is the essence of the authority of a democratic government…Today the authority and sovereignty of a democratic Parliament is supported and legitimised daily by the work of our courts.” (Dominic Grieve QC MP, former Attorney General)

    …“The Attorney General is also the head of the Government Legal Service”…”a member of key Cabinet Committees at which rule of law issues may arise (and on which the Lord Chancellor does not sit). These include the Parliamentary Business and Legislation Committee and the National Security Council. These are important avenues through which potential rule of law issues can be noted and raised at an early stage. In addition, the Attorney General scrutinises all Government bills for their compliance with human rights law and legal propriety.”…(House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution 6th Report of Session 2014–15)

    __________

    The Attorney General for England and Wales is the chief legal adviser of the Crown in England and Wales, and a member of the UK Government. The Attorney General provides legal advice to the Government of the day. By convention, and unlike the papers of other ministers, this legal advice is available to subsequent governments… The Attorney General oversees the small Attorney General’s Office and also has responsibility for the Government Legal Department, which is headed by the Treasury Solicitor. When a Government Department has no internal legal capacity, the Government Legal Department provides it, instructing independent counsel where necessary. The Attorney General is a barrister and can appear in court in person, though in practice he/she rarely does so, and then only in cases of outstanding national importance. In those cases the Government Legal Department provides his back-up. The Attorney General also has supervisory powers over prosecutions, including those mounted by the Crown Prosecution Service, headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions; the Serious Fraud Office; and the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. The Attorney General has public interest functions, being, for example, the trustee of default where a sole trustee has died, and can also take cases to the Supreme Court where points of general legal importance need to be settled. The Attorney General is assisted by the Solicitor General for England and Wales, currently Robert Buckland. Under the Law Officers Act 1997, the Solicitor General may do anything on behalf of, or in the place of, the Attorney General, and vice versa. Under the Government of Wales Act 2006, the Counsel General for Wales is the chief legal adviser to, and a member of, the Welsh Government. (Wikipedia)

  215. Mr Grieve (Dominic Grieve, MP, former Attorney General) stressed that Government lawyers were not, however, “spies in government departments telling me when ministerial colleagues might be on the point of going off the rails”. With only a small number of staff in the Attorney General’s Office, the Law Officers are “certainly not in a position to be overseers of the rule of law”. Another limit on the Attorney General’s capacity to be a guardian of the rule of law is that he or she, although of cabinet rank, is not a full member of the Cabinet. In recent years it has become standard practice for the Attorney General to attend all Cabinet meetings, but unlike the Lord Chancellor they do so at the invitation of the Prime Minister, not as of right. Moreover, as the Government’s legal adviser rather than a minister (as Lady Scotland described it “in government but not of government”), the Attorney General may be privy to less of the policy discussions in which rule of law issues could arise…..With the post-reform Lord Chancellors playing a more limited and reactive guardianship role, the Law Officers have become ever more important in this respect. Although the Law Officers are not, as Mr Grieve told us, in a position to oversee the rule of law more generally across government, they do have a significant role supporting the Lord Chancellor in his duty to do so. This includes alerting the Lord Chancellor to potential rule of law issues, and working with him or her in Cabinet in uphold the rule of law, including defending judicial independence. As Lord Falconer told us: “the Attorney and the Lord Chancellor acting together are quite a powerful force in government.” (House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution 6th Report of Session 2014–15)

  217. Len Lawrence
    seems to me that the legal system is just one massive fraud designed to enrich the legal profession….
    As Action Fraud sad “These people are obviously very well protected”
    Sadly when the Fraud Act 2006 was released there were apparently no powers given for enforcement – wonder why?

  218. One judicial weapon that must be dismantled is the use of restraint orders at a judge’s discretion – it’s completely arbitrary.

  219. Captain Lawrence

    necesse est ab aliqua

    What was done to you was not a mistake, it was planned and well-orchestrated at the time by a lawyers,
    masterminded by the barrister Dominic Brazil. Stephens Road Chambers, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE
    WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    necesse est ab aliqua

  220. The Rule of Law

    How can the rule of law be upheld when there are so many problems with the Judiciaries and the Secret Courts?

    Judicial Incompetence, Conflict of Interest, Unethical Judicial Appointments, Unfair Trials, Lack of Court Support, Financial Extortion, Impractical Orders, Lack of Access to Justice…are all major problems for United Kingdom.

    Such issues must urgently be addressed by the Government and rectified to uphold and promote the people’s highly marketed and promoted democratic rights by the State. The fundamental principle of the UK constitution, for a free and fair society, is found in the Magna Carta dating back to 1215. Yet Judges ignore such rights in order to promote the Government’s agenda and their own financial interest of making money out of the system.

    Government’s agenda is Domestic Abuse and the Judges protect those who commit domestic abuse if they are represented by counsel who they trust and depend on for future benefits. It is encouraged, promoted and favoured by the Judges and Abusers who together contribute to the Government’s plans and policies.

  221. The judicial crimes are being committed in Her Majesty’s courts. Surely the Queen cannot plead ignorance of this fact?

  222. Anonymous says:
    June 28, 2020 at 5:45 pm

    Surely the Queen cannot plead ignorance of this fact?

    Her Majesty’s courts are also putting thousands of male and female veterans, Army Navy and RAF
    on to the streets like myself.

    13% [maybe more] of Her Majesty’s Category A and Category B Training Prisons are occupied by
    veterans, including those with PTSD like Corprol Jimmy Johnston

  223. A significant portion of NHS staff are also in prison because of false allegations made by the judiciary including Simon Oliver. The army veterans fight for our country and our medical professionals fight in our hospitals to keep us safe and our judiciary do injustices against us. I wonder in Justice Nicklin is already using a predetermined decision? We know that justice Julian Knowles did.

  224. The Central Family Court.

    To: Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    Another one of your female victims contacted me today. In addition to the mother that contacted
    me last week, who’s children and home you had also taken.

    Again the name of solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors has surfaced.
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors was acquired by Clifton Ingram solicitors around 2014.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield
    Sarah Benfield is a Family & Divorce solicitor based in Clifton Ingram’s Solicitors,
    County House, 17 Friar Street, Reading, Berkshire RG1 1DB United Kingdom
    sarahbenfield@cliftoningram.co.uk

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield has a remarkable history:

    On 3 July 2014 The Master’s Support Unit, Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice,
    disclosure barrister Caroline Willbourne, 1 Garden Court Chambers, report on Mr. Lawrence.
    “Incapable of legal discussion and understanding with the Official Solicitor of any solicitor
    instructed by him from November 2004 and at the time of the report 14 September 2005”

    Knowing that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection, Sarah Benfield obtained my
    signature on Legal Aid Forms, without the knowledge of the Court of Protection. Thereafter,
    solicitor Sarah Benfield went on a revenue gathering exercise of almost £14,000. She has never
    returned this money that was stolen from me.

    In his judgment dated 30 Augst 2012, my Worshipful Brother, HHJ Simon Oliver was entirely
    satisfied by solicitor Sarah Benfield’s conduct. The Law Society was not! They instructed
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors to pay the maximum compensation for Sarah Benfield’s
    actions, £600 !!

    Leonard Lawrence
    cc

    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton. Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons.

    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE

  225. As early as 2004 District Judges in the Thames Valley Police Area have been conducting Court
    of Protection hearings, without authorisation, including those listed below.

    19 January 2009 Court of Protection to Mr. Lawrence
    The following judges at Slough County Court have not and currently do not hold a nomination of
    the Court of Protection
    DJ Fortgang
    DJ Jones
    DJ Devlin

    Please also be advised that to date the Court of Protection has received no application from any
    person or body.

  226. cfc.courtorders@Justice.gov.uk

    To: The Central Family Court.
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    WBRo Simon,

    The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.

    All of the files, documents and emails that I was never meant to see have been recovered for me!!

    Barristers Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk, claiming fees of £10,000 per hour in your court!!
    Solicitor Susan Andrews claiming fees of £4000 for writing two letters !!

    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————
    LNF41919/DM1
    Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office letter to Dr. Royds at
    Cygnet Healthcare Godden Green.

    The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.

    I should be grateful therefore if you would consider the enclosed Court of Protection Certificate and
    complete and return it to me if you consider that Mr. Lawrence is incapable of managing and
    administration his financial affairs.

    (The following notes accompanied the Court of Protection CP3 sent to Dr. Royds by the Official
    Solicitors Office)

    NOTES
    Please read these notes before completing the medical certificate.
    Please note when the medical certificate has been completed its contents will be confidential to the
    Court and the Public Guardianship Office and those authorized by the Court or the Public Guardianship
    Office to see it.

  227. cfc.courtorders@Justice.gov.uk

    To: The Central Family Court.
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    THERE COULD BE THOUSANDS OF CASES LIKE MINE IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA!

    3 February 2005

    Official Solicitor to the Senior Practitioner Calcot Medical Centre.

    The Official Solicitor already acts for Mr. Lawrence in his divorce proceedings.

    Mr. Lawrence has assets, and the Official Solicitor needs to know whether he is capable of managing
    his financial affairs, or be vulnerable to exploitation from some unscrupulous person. Another reason
    is that Mr. Lawrence may need to provide funding for the divorce proceedings if he is not eligible for
    public funding. This can only be secured with authority from the Court of Protection.

    Doctors not told Mr. Lawrence was not eligible for public funding, had already been certified under
    Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 on 23/11/04.

    That a Court of Protection Medical Certificate was issued on the 27/1/05 and Mr. Lawrence signature
    had already been obtained on public funding forms by solicitor Sarah Benfield under instruction from
    solicitor Helen Clift Official Solicitors office.

    After a medical with two doctors at Calcot Medical Centre, the doctors refuse to issue a Court of Protection
    CP3 to the Official Solicitors office.

    Calcot Medical Centre identified as obstructive by the Official Solicitor’s office.

    Leonard Lawrence

  228. Suella Braverman MP
    [now serving as Attorney General for England and Wales]

    Quote

    We need a radical plan to reform family justice

    One of those injustices lies in our antiquated family justice system.

  229. Solicitor Sarah Benfield

    Sarah Benfield is a Family & Divorce solicitor based in Clifton Ingram’s Solicitors,
    County House, 17 Friar Street, Reading, Berkshire RG1 1DB United Kingdom
    sarahbenfield@cliftoningram.co.uk

    Again the name of solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors has surfaced.
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors was acquired by Clifton Ingram solicitors around 2014.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield having obtained my signature on legal aid forms, without Court of Protection
    authorisation, thereafter she went on a revenue gathering exercise generating legal fees of £13,866
    without the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence

  230. Diary Manager to the Permanent Secretary Jacee.Daley@justice.gov.uk

    SIR RICHARD HEATON, PERMANENT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

    WHY WOULD THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE BE FINANCING HHJ SIMON OLIVER’S CIVIL ACTION
    IN THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION, [WITH LEGAL COSTS NOW AROUND £50,000] TO TAKEDOWN
    THIS WEBSITE?

    THE MONIES WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVITY SPENT, INVESTIGATING HOW MANY COURT OF
    PROTECTION CASES HHJ SIMON OLIVER HEARD AT READING COUNTY COURT, BETWEEN 2011 AND
    THE 6 OCTOBER 2015. WHEN HE DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION.

    ——————————————————————————
    Judicial Office for England & Wales, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    Our Reference: [104182] 31 March 2016

    His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015.

    —————————————————————————–

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    HHJ Simon Oliver held four Court of Protection Certificates

    Case: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938

    HHJ Simon Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?

    Barrister Dorian Day: It does.

    HHJ Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    Barrister Dorian Day: Yes

    ——————————————————————————
    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  231. It’s because the nasty little Richard Heaton wants to keep his dirty little secrets just that, completely secret! Mr Heaton has a long fight on his hands. As our friends in the US Navy say, IT WILL BE A COLD DAY IN HELL BEFORE THIS SITE EVER COME DOWN!

    And we must also say, if Sheikh is commited, we have plans reserved for Oliver. But we won’t say it here.

  233. If Heaton is on a hit list, this will not be the reason for it.

    Demob happy? MoJ chief recounts financial mess of Grayling era

    By John Hyde 30 June 2020

    The outgoing top civil servant at the Ministry of Justice has admitted the department was previously hamstrung by ‘ambitious and unrealistic’ savings targets which left it begging the Treasury for handouts.

    Sir Richard Heaton said the department was over-optimistic about the receipts it would bring in when he became permanent secretary in 2015. As a result, it was forced to repeatedly ask for help to meet funding gaps.

    Heaton has been rumoured to be on the hitlist for the government’s so-called ‘war with Whitehall’, following this week’s announcement that cabinet secretary Sir Mark Sedwill is stepping down this year.

    Appearing yesterday before the House of Commons public accounts committee, Heaton confirmed that his five-year tenure ends in August but said that talk of his departure was ‘at the moment speculation’.

    Whether he is being retained or not, Heaton was notably candid during his submissions to the committee about the problems experienced under Chris Grayling, who was appointed justice secretary in 2012.

    The consequences of Grayling’s reforms came to a head in 2015, Heaton said. ‘What went wrong was the 2015 spending settlement, an agreement between my department and the Treasury. We are both to blame. Resource spending was vastly under-cooked in that 2015 settlement – the expectations of income receipts were unrealistic and the expectation we would drive money out of the legal aid system was unrealistic.

    ‘It repeatedly became clear that the whole of the 2015 spending settlement was insecure. From that moment onwards we had to be hand in hand with the Treasury every step of the way. They were having to bail us out by increasing out main estimates and increasing our supplementary estimates. Twice a year we had to go cap in hand to the Treasury and it was not a great position for the department to be in.’

    Heaton said the department was now in a more sustainable position and that the 2019 settlement had provided the money to ‘broadly speaking keep the lights on’.

    The 2015 spending review pledged an extra £1.3bn in capital investment to transform the prison estate to better support rehabilitation, and £700m to spend in the courts and tribunals system.

    But it also required savings to the department’s administrative budget of 50% by 2019/20 and overall resource savings of 15% over the same period. Non-capital resources were to be reduced from £6.2bn to £5.6bn over five years.

    The Treasury was forced to offer additional funding to plug the gap between the original 2019/20 estimate in the 2015 spending review and the 2019/20 budget. This gap included a £324m shortfall in fee income and provisions for fees that were incorrectly charged, as well as other over-estimates about the savings that could be made.

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/demob-happy-moj-chief-recounts-financial-mess-of-grayling-era/5104818.article

    So long, Ricky! We hope you get what you deserve.

  234. Mr Heaton has always been known to lie. The reason his department were living on handouts was because he spent most of the budget protecting crooked judges like Simon Oliver by doing private litigation in the high court with predetermined outcomes. The rest of the money was spent covering up abuse in South London care homes which he is known to actively be involved in

  235. UNDER CONSTRUCTION

    THE LEONARD LAWRENCE STORY

    LAWYERS BEHAVING BADLY

    Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study), Basel, Switzerland

    Dr. Graham C. Holt
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220): “At this point the tenor of the presentation
    changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence….
    His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and
    that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession,
    who lacked knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the
    legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance
    to tackle those culpable.”

    THE LEONARD LAWRENCE STORY

    Leave a comment

    Hospital Medical Director
    Report reference: Leonard Lawrence
    He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor
    of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s)
    had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months
    regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable
    amounts of his assets went missing.

    Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215)
    In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation
    claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care

    Commander Royal Navy
    Dear Len,
    A cover up by Police, Lawyers and all and sundry.
    NEVER GIVE IN, but stand resolute and strong in bringing down these corrupt and deceitful persons who
    were responsible for all your hurt and pain too. Rest assured we are alongside you in exposing this unlawful
    and criminal activity.

  237. TO WHOEVER CONSTRUCTED THE WEBSITE BELOW, A BIG THANK YOU

    Is this the website https://lawyersbehavingbadly.wordpress.com

    DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID, IT DOES NOT BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION

    HOW MANY COURT OF PROTECTION CASES WBro HHJ SIMON OLIVER HEARD AT READING COUNTY
    COURT BETWEEN 2011 AND OCTOBER 2015, WHEN HE DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION
    AUTHORISATION, REMAINS UNKNOWN AT THIS PRESENT TIME.

    HUNDREDS? MAYBE EVEN A THOUSAND COURT OF PROTECTION CASES?

    WITH BARRISTER DOMINIC BRAZIL, 1 KINGS BENCH WALK CHAMBERS, CLAIMING A FEE OF £10,000
    FOR A ONE HOUR HEARING BEFORE HHJ SIMON OLIVER ON THE 16 APRIL 2012. SOLICITOR SUSAN
    ANDREWS, BP COLLINS SOLICITORS, CLAIMING £4000 FOR WRITING JUST TWO LETTERS, THE
    SUMS OF MONIES STOLEN FROM VULNERABLE PERSONS COULD BE IN THE TENS OF MILLIONS,
    POSSIBLY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF POUNDS.

    THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE HAS KNOW THAT SINCE 2004 COURT OF PROTECTION HEARINGS HAD
    BEEN TAKING PLACE IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA BY JUDGE THAT WERE NOT AUTHORISED
    TO HEAR COURT OF PROTECTION THESE CASES.

    FORMER READING SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT, NOW A SOLICITOR WITH GOVERNMENT LEGAL
    SERVICES, WORKING WITHIN THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR TO THE SENIOR COURT, WAS
    OF THE BELIEF THAT SHE WAS UNTOUCHABLE.

    THE EXISTENCE OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATES, USED BY HELEN MARY
    CLIFT IN MY CASE WERE NOT KNOWN TO EITHER THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN OR THE
    COURT OF PROTECTION. SOME ARE PLAIN A4 PAPER WITH THE WORDS COURT OF PROTECTION
    TYPED ON TO THE PAPER.

    HOWEVER, THERE IS A EVEN DARKER SIDE TO WHAT HAS BEEN OCCURING INVOLVING PARENTS
    AND CHILDREN.

    Leonard Lawrence

  238. Can someone please check whether Dr Shaikh is ok? It must be very traumatic for the gentleman with false anthrax attack claims and now committal hearings. I wouldnt want a hospital doctor to go to prison because our corrupt Ministry of Justice is more interested in protecting Simon Oliver then the public.
    Kindest regards

  239. Power of attorney usage continues to rise

    By Imogen Tew

    The number of people signing over financial control has continued to rise in 2020, with more than 200,000 powers of attorney submitted in the first quarter of the year.

    Data from the Ministry of Justice showed 239,647 powers of attorney were received in January to March 2020 — up 5 per cent from the same quarter last year.

    Almost all the applications were for lasting powers of attorney (99 per cent) while enduring powers of attorney made up the other 1 per cent.

    According to the MoJ, the rate of increase in powers of attorney became sharper in 2015 when there was more publicity around the agreements and the government introduced online forms, making the process more simple and faster to use.

    Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: “LPA applications have become progressively more popular over the last decade, and we could reach close to a million new applications per year at the current rate.

    “An LPA gives people peace of mind. This can be really important as individuals may experience distress and even family conflict if they’re trying to make complex choices about their financial and health needs at a time when they are grappling with the deterioration of their mental faculties.”

    Ms Griffin said it was possible the coronavirus crisis may have curtailed the number of people applying for a LPA in Q2 of 2020 given the requirements around wet signatures being hard to meet due to social distancing rules.

    She added: “If there is a decline as a result, hopefully it should only be temporary.”
    What is a lasting power of attorney?

    A lasting power of attorney allows someone, while they still have full mental capacity, to nominate a trusted friend or relative to make decisions on their behalf in cases of lost capacity.

    Financial and property LPAs can include paying bills and handling financial decisions, while control over medical decisions and potential life-sustaining treatments sits under health and welfare LPAs.

    The Office of Public Guardian, the government office which manages LPAs, said it wanted to become an important safeguarding partner that protected people who lacked mental capacity and had nominated an LPA.

    In a new strategy announced in April 2019, the office said part of its new strategy to protect such people would include working more closely with safeguarding partners, such as adult social services and the NHS, to help them understand the OPG’s role more and look for ways to work together more successfully.

    Although generally seen as a welcome trend, the increased number of LPAs comes with an increased amount of misuse.

    In October data showed the Office of Public Guardian made 721 applications to the Court of Protection to remove or censure LPAs in 2018/19 — 55 per cent more than the previous year and a record high.

    The findings also showed this figure had doubled over the past two years and that making improper gifts and not acting in a vulnerable person’s best interests were the two main reasons for having attorneys censured and removed.

    There have since been calls to reform the system after concerns were raised LPAs failed to provide support for vulnerable customers.

    imogen.tew@ft.com

    What do you think about the issues raised by this story? Email us on fa.letters@ft.com to let us know.

    https://www.ftadviser.com/your-industry/2020/07/03/power-of-attorney-usage-continues-to-rise/

  240. To: The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin
    Queen’s Bench Division

    Mr Justice Nicklin,
    Both Government Legal Services and barrister Benjamin Silverstone (Matrix Chambers)
    were requested to remove the false allegations made against me [Leonard Lawrence] by HHJ Simon
    Oliver in his civil action against Mr Javid Sheikh. My request has been stonewalled!

    HHJ Simon Oliver has a number of reasons why he would like to discredit me. In August 2019 Thames
    Valley Police disclosed a number of documents to me, including an entry by Thames Valley Police that
    the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) having reviewed my case had requested that I was visited.
    This request was not actioned.

    Mrs Justice Pauffley [Family Division] instructed HHJ Simon Oliver, on or about the 11 February 2013,
    that my case be retransferred from Reading County Court to the Court of Appeal. Seven years later the
    re-transferring order has still to be actioned.

    On the 11 June, 2006 Thames Valley Police request to Devon and Cornwall Police that I be visited, a
    task assigned to PC 2631 Emma Pack, now Sergeant 2631 Emma Storey-Barrett, Devon and Cornwall
    Police.

    MOE66 – SPOKEN WITH DTR ADVISED FOR ROUTING AND ATTENDANCE AS PER THAMES VALLEY
    ADVICE 11/06/13 21:11:53

    JN20L – LIAISED WITH PC PACK WHO ATTENDED AND SPOKE TO MR LAWRENCE. 12/06/13 11:27:04)

    F/JN32E – I HAVE EMAILED TVP WITH HIS ACCOUNT AFTER SPEAKING TO THE MALE AT LENGTH
    12/06/2013 11:19:24

    February 2020 a disclosure by Devon and Cornwall Police evidenced that PC Emma Pack 2631 [Sergeant
    2631 Emma Storey-Barrett] Devon and Cornwall Police never attended my home. The senior officer
    responsible for neutralising the above police officers misconduct is the former Force Intelligence Officer,
    Detective Superintendent Claire Armes, now Chief Superintendent Claire Armes, Avon and Somerset Police.

    There is a period from 2011 to October 2015 during which time HHJ Simon Oliver conducted Court of
    Protection hearings, when he did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation, with the knowledge of
    The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) and Ministry of Justice!

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

  241. Aug 15, 2017

    Never sign a lasting power of attorney

    Former Court of Protection judge Denzil Lush said he would never sign a lasting power of attorney
    because it can have a ‘devastating effect’ on family relationships.

    Power of attorney allows someone – usually a family member – to make a financial decision for
    someone who believes they are unable to do so

  242. CATCHING MONSTERS

    WHO IN 2015/16 WITHIN THAMES VALLEY POLICE STOPPED THE INVESTIGATION INTO MY CASE?

    Chief Constable Francis Habgood Thames Valley Police?
    Deputy Chief Constable John Campbell?
    Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice Tim De Meyer?

    The trail starts with Det. Supt. Gillian Wootton, then Professional Standards. Does it go higher?
    —————————————————————————–

    It was Detective Superintendent Nick Downing that directed me to Action Fraud where my case was
    reviewed by Steve Proffitt [Ex Head of Action Fraud]

    Linkedin
    Nick Downing
    Det Supt Nick Downing, Head of Proceeds of Crime for London, Specialist Economic and Organised
    Crime Command Location New Scotland Yard, later Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing Head
    of Serious Crime for Kent and Essex Police.

    Linkedin
    Steve Proffitt. Ex-Head of Action Fraud
    A retired Metropolitan Police officer with 30 years police service predominantly in the CID.
    An expert in complex and protracted Fraud Investigation and Police crime management and
    crime recording. A Home Office subject matter expert in Police Recorded Crime and was
    responsible for drafting amendments to the Home Office Counting Rules for recorded crime
    for a number of years. Part of the team that established Action Fraud and the National Fraud
    Intelligence Bureaux. He is an Ex-Head of Action Fraud,

    Reference GA 490. 16:58 3 February 2015 Glen Bancroft
    Following a review of my case by Steve Proffitt [Ex-Head of Action Fraud] offenses of fraud,
    perjury and other more serious offenses were identified.

    August 2019 Thames Valley Police released details of an internal review of my cases, carried
    out in 2015/16. The solicitor’s BP Collins Solicitors had obtained a Part V11 MHA 1983 medical
    report in November 2004 making me a patient subject to the Court of Protection. Then denied
    the existence of this report to the court.

    IPCC notes show:
    Thames Valley Police, Professional Standards Department, under Tim De Meyer, put into place
    special procedures to deal with my case, avoiding other police officers!

    Leonard Lawrence

  245. From: len lawrence
    Sent: 06 July 2020 12:01
    To: attorneygeneral.gov.uk
    Cc: ben silverstone….; pgm@berks….
    Subject: What’s happening here?

    bcc Clerk to The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin

    Queen’s Bench Division

    D…..,
    There appears to be communication problem between Government Legal Services (GLS),
    and Benjamin Silverstone, [Matrix Chambers] and myself. Would you be so kind as to forward
    this email on to GLS and Benjamin Silverstone.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    ———————————————————————————-

    Hello Len,

    What’s happening here? I can’t tell who posted the video.

    My Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver [assisted by the Ministry of Justice, Government Legal Services,
    and represented by Benjamin Silverstone, [Matrix Chambers], made a number of false allegations against
    me, as outlined in points 52 and 53 of Mr Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement. I was never told
    of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver’s false allegations.

    Why was I never informed of HHJ Simon Oliver’s false allegations, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone
    seeking summary judgement? Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within points
    52 and 53 can be identified. One of the posts on the judges behaving badly website that I am falsely accused
    of making by HHJ Simon Oliver relates to a 14-year old girl that HHJ Simon Oliver placed into care. The post,
    I suggest, was made by a male member of the 14-year-old girls family.

    Secondly, HHJ Simon Oliver alleges that I encouraged other victims to cause a disturbance outside his
    home in Lowther Rd, Wokingham, Berkshire. Absolute lies!

    My preferred location would have been a meeting (rather than a disturbance) at the office of Dr. David
    Staples, The Chief Executive of The United Grand Lodge of England and Wales, Freemasons Hall, 60
    Great Queen St, Holborn, London WC2B 5AZ, the headquarters of the United Grand Lodge of England
    and Wales. However, a discussion had already taken place at Freemason Hall, London, regarding the
    conduct of my Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver and what he has done to others and myself, a third-
    generation disabled Royal Navy veteran.

    In response to the email from the Freemason of Senior London Grand Rank, what happened Len?

    My WBr. HHJ Simon Oliver has recently instigated committal proceeding against Mr. Javed Sheikh.
    He appears very determined to have Javed Sheikh imprisoned.

    Why Mr Javed Sheikh? Mr Javed Sheikh is of Indo-Pakistani descent, he has faced a number of serious
    allegations. It is alleged in a national newspaper that Mr Shaikh was responsible for a post threatening
    to sprinkle anthrax over HHJ Simon Oliver’s home. Why has Mr Shaikh not been questioned by The South
    East Regional Organised Crime Unit (SEROCU) given such a serious threat of an anthrax attack?

    The South East Regional Organised Crime Unit (SEROCU) contacted me (off the record) advising me
    how barrister Dominic Brazil removed the Land Registry caution on my home, avoiding the Court for
    Protection, by using Land Registry Form MH4. However, it was not SEROCU that drove me to the
    meeting with Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox QC. or placed the files on my living room table containing the
    Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that Master Basil Yoxall, Queens Bench Division, had refused
    to disclose to the Court of Protection and Family Division in January 2012.

    Some of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver’s female victims have been forced to flee abroad with their children,
    others have lost both their children and their homes. One case involves a female with Muscular dystrophy
    [diseases that cause progressive weakness and loss of muscle mass] her elderly mother is/was forced to
    travel over 120 miles every time that she wishes to visit her disabled daughter because HHJ Simon Oliver
    would not allow the daughter to be transferred from a care home in Reading to Wales.

    Then there is the case of David, held in a care home in Reading and not allowed to see his elderly mother.
    Also, Jean, (elderly Frenchman) now in a care home in Reading and not allowed to see his partner. There
    is also the case of the 14-year old girl that WBr HHJ Simon Oliver put into a children’s home who then
    ran away. The Nigerian Family whose children were taken and the Nigerian lawyer who nearly lost her
    career because of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver and the telephone call to my now former barrister.

    My first memory as a Court of Protection patient after being evicted onto the streets was waking up on
    the settee of a Pakistani family in Southall. My second memory was being with two Nigerian doctors from
    the DWP questioning what had happened to me, they were very kind and very professional. Why is WBr
    HHJ Simon Oliver picking on these people?

    Finally, my own case, Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver wrote on the 30 August 2012 that he was
    entirely satisfied with how I was treated. As a third-generation disabled Royal Navy Veteran with an
    Acquired Brain Injury, whilst a patient subject to the Court of Protection [According to the Former
    Chambers of Mr Justice Francis QC and Mr Justice Cobb QC ] and lacking mental capacity, I was evicted
    onto the streets of Buckinghamshire without the knowledge of the Court of Protection and left to die.

    A Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank has given a more accurate account of what occurred to me, rather
    than the diagnosis of mental illness. SEE BELOW!

    Leonard Lawrence
    ————————————————————————————-
    4 August 2005 barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers had £10,000 costs placed upon me
    at Slough County Court, following a 5 minute Court of Protection hearing, when it is now known District
    Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Solicitor Susan Andrews, BP Collins Solicitor £4000 fee for writing two letters!

    The £10,000 fee’s claimed by barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk for the 1 hour hearing on the
    16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver WHO DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION
    AT THAT TIME.

    ———————————————————————————–
    in response to HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT:

    From a Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank

    If only all of the above were the whole story…

    Len lost his Pilot medical and could not continue flying – this was due to organophosphate poisoning due
    to a known problem with toxic additives use in aviation oils – Cases in Australia and the United States were
    settled long ago re this, but not in the UK.

    His wife Nicola started divorce proceedings (around 70% of those with Acquired Brain Injury are divorced
    by their spouse)

    Len’s was admitted to the Cygnet Healthcare Godden Clinic and was incorrectly diagnosed/medicated.

    Medication and incorrect treatment continued in the NHS for years to follow. Five Court of Protection
    incapacitation certificates were issued but the legal advisers failed as was their legal duty to register
    them with the Court of Protection.

    His house was sold unlawfully without the Court of Protection consent – a matter which all legal advisers
    were aware should not be done and a derisory settlement made to Len with considerable adverse financial
    inferences made against him by a district judge – John Fortgang in Slough who should not have made any
    order as he was not appointed by the Court of Protection.

    Another Judge – Jones disqualified herself from any dealings in the matter but then continued to make
    judgements against her own order disqualifying herself.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield, Radcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors in Reading were reprimanded by the Law
    Society and the maximum compensation awarded to Len – but even this was derisory amount £600.

    Len was subsequently referred to Professor Gordon Turnbull a consultant to the Civil Aviation Authority
    who made a correct diagnosis, and Len got on the road to recovery – a very long one.

    Every legal party to this event has tried to suppress Len, including Simon Oliver and quite frankly one
    should consider they should all be held liable for Len’s substantial losses and compensation.

    The gravity of this matter is such that it needs attention in the highest court in the land. I would suggest
    that a most senior high court judge be appointed to review this case in conjunction with the attorney
    general

    Good luck Len not all freemasons are like Simon Oliver.

  246. Hi Len,
    Just wondering if you could compile a list of bad people in your case, with stars out of 5 for evil. 5/5 for Oli of course.

  247. Thank you very much Len
    It shows a lot about Mr. Lawrence’s character when someone of the white persuasion speaks so highly of other ethnic minorities. This is something that no one gets when they go to court and puts their case before judge Simon Oliver. It is no wonder that Mr. Lawrence is so highly regarded across the world from many different communities and ethnic minorities. We also understand that judge Simon Oliver has actually admitted in his statement to the high court that the comments on this blog are in fact, correct all along. In the same statement, he accuses Mr. Lawrence of a series of claims without any evidence. This is just a tactical approach to discredit Mr. Lawrence which did not work. We are currently in the process of receiving the statement to which it will be analysed significantly. We are very disappointed at judge Simon Oliver and how low he has really gone this time.

  248. Hi, I have forwarded Dr Shaikhs articles as well as corresponding documentation to the Muslim council of the UK as I believe it is in the best interest of the Islamic community that they investigate the allegations of anthrax attacks against a Muslim doctor. Dr Shaikh has been exceptionally well behaved and has held his head up high whilst a court judge is using the system to abuse Muslims and they ruin them because of his own beliefs. They will need to make a public statement relating to the allegations of terrorist activities and doctors in the UK and why this judge has been allowed to manipulate the system on his is own accord. this will be regarded as a hate crime will have to be investigated by the police as well as the Islamic council. These hate crimes create further problems in our society which all Muslims have to be subjected to. Muslims are not terrorists and Simon Oliver has now branded an innocent doctor as a terrorist to exacerbate the stereotypes that exist in society to his own advantage. It is for exactly the same reasons that these fictional allegations can create harm to the wider Muslim community. I will be putting this onto my social media pages as well. If anyone has any further information about this, please contact me directly on my private email address so I can forward it onto the Muslim council of London and Berkshire who will have to act on these allegations because it affects all of us. Aali786@gmail.com. Kindest regards. Abdul Ali

  249. Dear all
    This is a contact page for the Islamic/Muslim council of Great Britain based in Whitechapel in East London. Please send all of your complaints and concerns regarding Simon Oliver to them so that they can respond directly. The Moj will have to answer to the allegations which they have secretly being encompassing as part of the campaign against Mr Sheikh

    Contact

  250. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/moj-chief-confirms-departure/5104946.article

    Dear All,
    We are glad to announce that Richard Heaton (laughingly style as ‘Sir’) has been sacked from the Ministry of Justice effective immediately. We wish him all the bad luck for his tenure ahead. Its a shame he is leaving under a dark cloud but that’s what happens when your spending public money and resources fighting for criminals rather the against them.

    Mr Heaton was the financier of the litigation against a medical practitioner who he labelled as a terrorist for just being a Muslim. He also protected judge Simon Oliver using the High Court as a kangaroo court exercise with pre-written judgements and pre-arranged outcomes. He was also responsible for abusing young boys in South London care homes and encouraging other legal unprofessionals to do so too with the protection of the MoJ. Mr Heaton leaves behind millions of victims across the world.

    We would like to offer Mr Heaton a job in our legal department where he can start off with a basic generous salary as a paralegal so he can witness the UK justice system in all its inglorious nonsense (considering he is ignoring everything and what everyone is saying on this site). He will of course be leaving with a big payout and a generous pension paid for by the taxpayer.

    We all at judges behaving badly wish him ‘good riddence to bad rubbish’.

    From the team at judges behaving badly

  251. http://www.intelligenceuk.com/images/fund_640_380_1.jpg

    INTELLIGENCE UK PRIVATE ANTI CORRUPTION FUNDRAISER

    Intelligence UK, the private intelligence agency dedicated to combating the UK’s domestic corruption issue running rife throughout the public authorities is raising funds to take direct action against the perpetrators.

    The leadership need a shake up, one that the common purpose system will never give them.

    These taxpayer sponsored state terrorists within the secret family, insolvency and criminal courts literally do have blood on their hands, they are responsible for more deaths by suicide and loss of quality of life than all of the Islamic State terrorists on British soil combined. These are the terrorists operating from within. The courts are not going justice, the regulators don’t regulate and the police and courts provide impunity to the corruptors, the deceitful lawyers of common purpose who have been using our courts as cash cows and vehicles to asset strip under the facade of insolvency law. It is the leadership at fault, if the leadership lack integrity, then everything they lead goes south, that is precisely what has happened. It is time to hold them to account.

    We have assisted dozens of victims of human rights abuse and miscarriages of justice who have been terrorised through the courts. Many of whom we have assisted for free to further their cases and assist them in getting justice when otherwise they would not have done.

    We are raising a fighting fund to take direct intrusive action against all the perpetrators we have identified. We are able to operate swiftly and efficiently and being legally and technically trained we are not using funds to feed the cabal of lawyers, we have the capability to do it ourselves, with minimal reliance on third party counsel who only appear on the days in court.

    Please donate generously. Your donation will be making a massive difference, reshaping the UK justice system, and evoking change for the good of our country and future generations. We provide all our donors with regular updates so you can follow the progress we are making. Alternatively, please share this message with those you know that may take an interest in our campaign.

    Donate quickly and safely via Paypal processing:

    Alternatively, if you prefer, we can send you an E-invoice for the sum you could like to donate. Simply reply to this email telling us how much you would like to donate and details for the invoice and we will take care of it right away. Please feel free to contact us with any questions.

    Thank you and have a great weekend.

    INTELLIGENCE UK

    http://www.intelligenceuk.com/campaignx2.html

  253. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/who_is_financing_judge_simon_oli_7

    I have amade a FOI request to the cabinet office.

    Dear Cabinet Office,

    I want make a Freedom of Information request where i woukd like the following questions answered;

    1. In the litigation in the High Court of Oliver v S, case number QB-2019-000194, who in the Ministry of Justice is financing this? Is it Mr Richard Heaton?
    2. The judgement for this litigation has been put on the Matrix Chambers website by Mr Benjamin Silverstone. The approved judgement uploaded on and is dated 29th November 2019 when the High Court handed down this judgement on 10th December 2019. Does the MoJ know this and can they explain why this approved judgement was given 12 days before the hand down date to Matrix Chambers?
    3. Justice Julian Knowles and Barrister Mr Benjamin Silverstone were aware of each other’s identity prior to the hearing in Oliver v S on the 29th November 2019, as they both worked together at Matrix Chambers. Can the MoJ explain why this hearing proceeded under fraudulent basis?
    4. In the litigation, Oliver v S, QB-2019-000194, judge Simon Oliver states he paid costs totalling £40,000. No paperwork has ever been provided. However, on the following link, it states that the Government Legal Department is instructed to represent judge Simon Oliver.
    https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/22.jpg
    Which one is correct? Has HHJ Oliver financed his own litigation?
    5. Thousands of victims of judge Simon Oliver exist but the MoJ has refused to address these concerns. It involves bribery, gang rapes, extortion, child abduction and false accusations? Has the MoJ conducted any investigation into judge Simon Oliver since 1993?
    6. Regarding newspapers articles with URLs;
    A.) https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/extrainee-doctor-in-threeyear-malicious-vendetta-against-judge-a4311991.html
    B.) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/former-trainee-doctor-threatens-anthrax-attack-against-judge-zm75nklrj
    C.) https://theeyeofmedia.com/circuit-judge-places-injunction-against-aggrieved-doctor/

    Has judge Simon Oliver reported any of these allegations of being subjected to anthrax attacks to the regional crime squad or the police? The allegation is not supported by evidence but has been accepted by the MoJ and the High Court. Can the MoJ provide evidence of this? If not? Can you clarify why a Muslim doctor was accused of this and published in international media creating libel.

    Yours faithfully,
    Aaron Parks

  255. On the 5th June 2018 I attended a First Tier Tribunal and the Judge was a Mr Lederman, this was held at Fox Court in a separate room at the back of the building. This case was a ‘KANGAROO COURT’, there was a release medical certificate that Lederman continually used as evidence, I explained that the medical certificate was a FORGERY but he refused to accept this fact. He refused to hear my evidence. I had ‘DIRECTIONS ‘ from the late Judge Stubbs and Judge Horrocks that the original compendium of Radiation Film Badges and QFE Dosimeters be handed into court for examination but the Ministry of Defence Legal Team refused to do so. ‘Directions were also given that a Mr R Cockerill, the dosimetry Manager at AWE be made available for cross examination at Court: Again, the Ministry of Defence legal team refused .

    I requested the Upper Tier to ‘Set Aside’ the judgement of this case but they refused, stating, that they could not interfere with the decision of the lower court. I wrote to the RCJ and the Supreme Court only to be told that it was up to the Upper Tier.
    The judgement made by Lederman contained many lies and inaccuracies he should not be placed in a position to Judge.

  256. On the 5th June 2018 I attended a First Tier Tribunal and the Judge was a Mr Lederman, this was held at Fox Court in a separate room at the back of the building. This case was a ‘KANGAROO COURT’, there was a release medical certificate that Lederman continually used as evidence, I explained that the medical certificate was a FORGERY but he refused to accept this fact. He refused to hear my evidence. I had ‘DIRECTIONS ‘ from the late Judge Stubbs and Judge Horrocks that the original compendium of Radiation Film Badges and QFE Dosimeters be handed into court for examination but the Ministry of Defence Legal Team refused to do so. ‘Directions were also given that a Mr R Cockerill, the dosimetry Manager at AWE be made available for cross examination at Court: Again, the Ministry of Defence legal team refused .

    I requested the Upper Tier to ‘Set Aside’ the judgement of this case but they refused, stating, that they could not interfere with the decision of the lower court. I wrote to the RCJ and the Supreme Court only to be told that it was up to the Upper Tier.
    The judgement made by Lederman contained many lies and inaccuracies he should not be placed in a position to Judge.

  257. Regarding links with URL

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/extrainee-doctor-in-threeyear-malicious-vendetta-against-judge-a4311991.html?amp

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/former-trainee-doctor-threatens-anthrax-attack-against-judge-zm75nklrj

    https://m.facebook.com/eveningstandard/posts/3042055499171424

    Ex-trainee doctor in three-year 'malicious vendetta' against judge

    Dear Everyone

    Can everyone that has read the newspaper articles relating to anthrax attacks lodge an online police report to the police on the link at the bottom. This is because everyone that has read it is a witness to the hate crime that Dr Sheikh has been subjected to by Simon Oliver. You don’t have to put in your real address and only put in your email address so that they can contact you for a statement if required. Even if you do not know Simon Oliver, as long as you have read the newspaper articles online, then that is enough for you to become a witness to the crime. No one knows how many people have read the articles but the more crime reports that can be lodged, the better.

    https://www.met.police.uk/ro/report/ocr/af/how-to-report-a-crime/report-crime-happened-online/?lid=a01c9931-7c28-49e5-a344-eeb38d598ea7&cid=&rid=5&stepid=1-2-2-4-3-2

    Kindest regards

  258. To: Professor David Whyte, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    RE: MEDICAL CERTIFICATE NOT VALID

    Dear David

    Not one of the Court of Protection Medical Certificates issued in my case has the embossed seal of
    the Court of Protection on the certificate. Two Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, were issued
    by Dr. Jeremy Royds located at Cygnet Healthcare without a medical. Cygnet Healthcare is a private
    Healthcare company.

    The Court of Protection and Public Guardian has no knowledge of these Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificates having ever being issued. Both were held by solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official
    Solicitor to the Senior Courts and others.

    I had two visitors, not Thames Valley Police or the National Crime Agency. Another organisation.
    They wanted to view the Court of Protection Medical Certificates used to hold me for 18 months whilst I
    was asset stripped. In less than 30 seconds they questioned why none of the Court of Protection Medical
    Certificates had the embossed seal of the Court of Protection on them. Without the Court of Protection
    seal the Medical Certificates are not valid.

    I was instructed to send a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, to Thames Valley Police to ascertain
    the authenticity of the certificate. Eleven months later no reply!

    Thames Valley Police have however given up some more of their secrets, sufficient to incriminate the
    law firm BP Collins Solicitors and solicitor Graeme S FRASER.

    Kindest Regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    —————————————————————————–
    Thu 01/08/2019 23:16
    Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police
    Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames Valley Police

    Dear Sir’s

    Ref: JC & JH 1/8/19

    1. Please find an electronic copy of a document titled: COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
    issued on the 27 January 2005 by Dr Jeremy Royds, a private psychiatrist from Cygnet Healthcare,
    Godden Green, Kent.

    2. Hard copies of the attached Court of Protection Medical Certificate addressed to yourselves have been
    received by Thames Valley Police HQ. See Below:

    Your item was collected from **Kidlington DO** at **24-07-2019**.
    Signed for by: TVP HQ
    Service used: Royal Mail Signed For™ Delivered: 9:10am

    3. Former officers, equivalent in rank to yourselves, have inspected the attached Court of Protection
    Medical Certificate. They note that this specific COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
    was viewed by a detective and financial officer from Thames Police, Economic Crime Unit,
    (around 2010) when they visited me in Devon.

    4. I am directed to enquire whether the attached COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE is
    authentic or fraudulent?

    Yours respectfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  259. A crisis in the judiciary: Joshua Rozenberg on the High Court’s failure to staff its benches

    A crisis in the judiciary: Joshua Rozenberg on the High Court’s failure to staff its benches

    By Joshua Rozenberg
    Oct 16 2017 9:58am
    Rumour has it only 19 of this year’s 25 vacancies were filled

    Not enough people want to become judges. Or, at least, there are not enough people coming forward who are good enough to join the High Court.

    There were precisely 100 High Court judges in post this month at the start of the legal year. With a complement of 108, the court is eight judges short — or nine given that Mr Justice Peter Smith has, in effect, been suspended on full pay for more than a year. Contrary to my prediction at the time, Smith failed to stand down in the spring and a disciplinary panel is preparing to consider complaints against him at the end of this month.

    The High Court has been running below full strength for some time now. Last year, there were 14 vacancies and six posts were left unfilled. In his latest annual report, the outgoing Lord Chief Justice said that he and his senior colleagues continued to be immensely concerned about the “serious loss of morale across the judiciary and continuing dissatisfaction over working conditions, the volume of work, and pay and pensions”. Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd added that any failure to address the problems of pay and pensions would have a serious impact on morale and on recruitment.

    So, will the High Court ever be fully staffed?

    “It is not uncommon for there to be a time lag before newly appointed judges take up office,” I was told by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). “There will be more announcements in the coming months.”

    But how many? The word on the street is that 19 appointments were approved after the JAC advertised “up to 25” vacancies earlier this year (screenshot below). Only 13 names were announced during the summer, with 12 of those judges joining the High Court on 2 October (the beginning of the legal year).

    Screenshot via JAC’s website
    And the JAC has already established another High Court selection exercise, with applications to be lodged by the middle of November. Again, there will be “up to 25 vacancies” across all three divisions of the High Court.

    This is the second time the JAC has announced that no part-time judging experience will be needed. But, as it adds from what must be bitter experience, any solicitor or barrister who is only now thinking of putting in an application before the deadline next month has probably left it too late to demonstrate transferable skills.

    The latest comments from across Legal Cheek
    In fact, pretty much all 13 new High Court judges appointed in August and September have some judicial experience. Four were promoted from the lower ranks: Julian Goose QC, who was a senior circuit judge specialising in crime; Clare Moulder, a former Linklaters partner who sat in commercial, immigration and criminal cases; Gwynneth Knowles QC, who was a judge of the upper tribunal; and Peter Lane, a former tribunal judge who has now been appointed president of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).

    Some of those who have come straight from the bar are strikingly young: Matthew Nicklin QC, former joint head of chambers at the media set 5RB, is 46. Julian Knowles QC, formerly an extradition and public law expert at Matrix Chambers, is 48. So is Sara Cockerill QC, a shipping specialist. And some are significantly older: Martin Spencer QC, who was at Hailsham Chambers, is 61. Jonathan Cohen QC is 66 but hardly a new boy, having sat part-time in the family division since 2005.

    While Cohen has a distinguished judicial ancestor, several new judges are state-educated and were the first in their families to study at university. Akhlaq Choudhury QC was born in England to parents from Bangladesh and educated at a comprehensive near Glasgow. David Williams QC went to a comprehensive school in Leighton Buzzard. Simon Bryan QC’s education in Blackpool was state-funded.

    Others demonstrate that there is more to life than being a lawyer: Amanda Yip QC, from Liverpool, had three children before she was 30 and is a strong supporter of flexible working at the bar.

    So: nine men, four women; nine practitioners, four full-time judges (including, for the first time, tribunal judges); 11 barristers, two solicitors; one person of Asian descent. All things considered, quite a diverse group?

    More broadly, Lady Hale is now president of the Supreme Court and Lady Black of Derwent has joined her on the bench, along with the first Welsh-speaking justice, Lord Lloyd-Jones. Lord Justice Singh is now in the Court of Appeal. Time for the JAC to rest on its laurels?

    Not according to Graham Gee, a professor of public law at the University of Sheffield and Erika Rackley, a professor of law at the University of Birmingham. The two academics have recently edited a series of essays called Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity, based on a conference they arranged.

    Some of the contributors to their book speak from a position of great authority.

    Sir Tom Legg was permanent secretary to the Lord Chancellor from 1989 to 1998 and, in his day, was effectively a one-man JAC. He has some interesting reflections on merit although I’m not persuaded by his suggestion that we should restore a political element in the appointments process. That still exists, as we saw when Liz Truss, as Lord Chancellor, excluded the judges’ favourite for appointment as Lord Chief Justice this year. There is speculation that Truss was doing the Prime Minister’s bidding.

    Other contributions are alarmingly bland.

    Christopher Stephens CBE, who chaired the JAC from 2011 to 2016, writes mainly about competency frameworks and ad hoc selection panels, about appraisals and performance metrics. Stephens admits he “would like to have seen greater numbers of diverse, non-traditional candidates joining the judiciary, particularly at more senior levels — not only from its four key target groups but also from other pools of talent such as academia, the employed bar, chartered legal executives and government lawyers”. But he does not seem to have found a way of recruiting them.

    Are there any? Gee and Rackley certainly think so; and they have summarised their proposals in a freely-available post. In summary, they say:

    The JAC must do more to ensure that the judiciary is not merely paying lip-service to diversity but actually pursues policies that will lead to faster change.
    The JAC should take more “ownership” of the selection process for senior appointments rather than simply endorsing the judges’ favoured candidates.
    The JAC should continue to scrutinise and improve its own processes.
    Overall, the JAC should supply more forceful leadership on diversity. It should have greater confidence in its ability to contest the preoccupations of ministers, a self-interested legal profession and an embattled judiciary.
    But what does that mean in practice? Surely merit is the only criterion for appointment?

    According to Gee and Rackley, some judges still cling to a traditional understanding of merit that places a premium on advocacy skills, experience at the bar and experience in a part-time fee-paid judicial role. The authors want more appointments to be made on the basis of potential.

    Judicial skills, they say, are not limited to the technical legal and advocacy abilities associated with excellence at the bar. They include communication, management and leadership skills that are needed for a successful career as a solicitor. The JAC should therefore resist the judiciary’s insistence on part-time judicial experience. This not only favours long-serving barristers, they argue. It also reinforces traditional understandings of merit.

    On this basis, we can see the JAC’s “no judicial experience necessary” boast as a sign of strength rather than of desperation. And its warning that solicitors have probably left it too late to join the judiciary next year now reads more like a counsel of despair.

    In their book, Gee and Rackley chart the tensions between Stephens, as chair of the JAC, and Thomas, as Lord Chief Justice.

    “Inside the JAC,” they write, “it was felt that the Lord Chief Justice was second-guessing many of its decisions… For their part, some senior judges felt that the JAC lacked an effective strategy for encouraging judicial diversity while others complained that its selection processes made too many onerous demands of the senior judiciary.”

    Gee and Rackley are quite right to say that the JAC should do more to publicise the improvements it has introduced already. Like other underfunded arms-length public bodies, the JAC has compromised its independence by outsourcing its media relations to the Ministry of Justice press office. When I first asked, the press office told me there were not 100 High Court judges holding office on 2 October but 100.5.

    100.5? Did the reference to 0.5 of a judge mean that one judge was working for 50% of the normal working hours? If so, who was it?

    We can’t tell you, said the MoJ press office. “On both counts this is personal information agreed between the individual and their head of division, and therefore it would be inappropriate to share this.”

    That’s absurd. I can see that a judge working half-time for medical reasons — perhaps while recovering from illness — might want that fact to be kept confidential. But the fact that a judge was permitted to work part-time — if that is what this means — is something the judiciary should be proud of.

    It also increased the headcount by half a judge. Or it did until a correction arrived. It seems there were two half-judges in the High Court last year. One has recently retired and the other has now reverted to full-time working.

    The failure to recruit enough permanent judges means that the High Court will continue to rely on lawyers sitting part-time. Some of those may be practitioners of the highest calibre who don’t want to give up the day job. Others may be among the 100 applicants for the High Court bench who didn’t make the grade this time (or, no doubt, in previous years).

    But there is one thing about this I find reassuring. If the JAC’s standards had been lower, it would have been perfectly possible to appoint another eight judges from those applicants. Had diversity had been the sole criterion for appointment, I imagine it would have been possible to make an even more diverse selection than the 13 whose names have so far been announced. Rightly, the JAC was unwilling to recommend candidates who did not merit appointment.

    Merit must never be diluted in order to meet diversity targets. We just need to search more widely for the best judges.

  260. Freemason ‘closed shop’ blocked me, says barrister

    A BARRISTER claims his application to become a judge has been turned down because he is not a freemason.

    Roger Everest says he was told 30 years ago that he would never get on in the legal profession after turning down an invitation to join the Dinas Llandaff lodge of the Freemasons in Cardiff.

    Last week the 64-year-old was informed by the director of judicial appointments at the Department for Constitutional Affairs that he was not being appointed a circuit judge.

    Earlier this year Mr Everest, who practises from chambers at Pontyclun near Cardiff, had a claim that his career had been blighted by his non-membership of the freemasons rejected by the European Court of Human Rights.

    Yesterday he said, “The judiciary in South Wales is a closed shop which I believe excludes ethnic minorities, women and men who are not part of a masonic network.

    “After over 30 years as a practising barrister on the Wales and Chester circuit with hundreds of satisfied clients – not one of whom has ever made a complaint against me – I am furious never to have been offered the opportunity to sit as a judge.

    “Through The Western Mail I call on the Labour Government to appoint an eminent and impartial privy councillor to investigate the many miscarriages of justice in South Wales – especially the wrongful convictions that followed the murders of Lynette White and Mr and Mrs Tooze – and to publish a register naming judges who have ever been masons. Judges should be appointed on their merit as lawyers, independent of their standing among masons.”

    Mr Everest said he planned to meet his MP Dr Kim Howells to discuss the matter.

    He added, “It is my firm belief that there is a masonic connection with the miscarriages of justice that have occurred in South Wales.”

    In February 1998, the Home Office committed itself to establishing public registers of Freemasons in the judiciary and the police.

    In a response to a report written by the Home Affairs select committee, the Home Office stated, “The Home Secretary proposes to make a formal request to the United Grand Lodge (the governing body of freemasonry in England and Wales) that they provide on a regional basis consistent with the regional structure of the Lodges, the names and identifying occupations and other necessary details of those who are or who become freemasons in the specified professions and occupations.

    “If the United Grand Lodge is unwilling or unable to comply with this request, or to comply only partially (for example because it does not itself have the data in the required form) the government will initially make arrangements for registers to be opened for all the specified professions and occupations. All would be invited to register. Although at this stage a failure to return information would not of itself be a breach of conditions of employment, any nil returns would be shown as such.

    “The government will consult on where the registers should be available but in any event it believes that they should be publicly available.

    “The government will address the need for legislation having regard to the extent of compliance with voluntary registers, once established.”

    John Hamill, director of communications for the United Grand Lodge said, “The Home Office did not pursue the idea of registers because of the incorporation of human rights legislation into UK law. Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights forbids discrimination against minorities.

    “When a straw poll was done of judges several years ago, less than five per cent were freemasons and none of those responsible for judicial appointments were.”

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/freemason-closed-shop-blocked-me-2474818

  261. BROTHERS IN SILK

    rebecca_6a

    THIS IS a tale of three Cardiff barristers.

    Two flourished — they became QCs. One has been honoured by the Queen, the other has made his name in major public inquiries.

    Both are members of an important legal lodge in Wales.

    The third prospered but was never made a QC. He believes this was because he refused to join the lodge.

    He took his fight to the European Court of Human Rights but failed.

    IT’S 1973. For five years Roger Everest has been a barrister at the chambers at 34 Park Place in Cardiff.

    Everest is invited by his clerk Ken Gorman to join a new masonic lodge that’s being set up. It’s to be called Dinas Llandaf.

    One of the founders of the lodge, Eifion Morgans, is a barrister who will later become head of chambers at 34 Park Place. Morgans is already a past master of another Cardiff lodge, Shir Gar.
    ROGER EVEREST The barrister believes his decision not to join a masonic lodge prevented him from being appointed a QC.

    ROGER EVEREST
    The barrister believes his decision not to join a masonic lodge prevented him from being appointed a QC.

    Another founder is solicitor Sir Norman Lloyd-Edwards who had been a Tory councillor in Cardiff for many years.

    Today he’s the Grand Master of the masonic province of South Wales. He stepped into that role in 2008 just as he retired from being the Queen’s man – Lord Lieutenant – in South Glamorgan.

    Other well-known Tory members of the lodge have included Stefan Terlezki, MP for Cardiff West between 1983 and 1987 and Gwilym Jones, MP for Cardiff North and a junior minister in the Welsh Office from 1992 to 1997.

    Everest decided not to join Dinas Llandaf. Ken Gorman warned him his advancement at the Bar would be affected.

    Two other members of the chambers were happy to join the lodge. They were Winston Roddick and Gerard Elias.

    When Dinas Llandaf opened for business the first master was the solicitor and Cardiff Tory councillor Julius Hermer.

    In 1984 Gerald Elias was made a Queen’s Counsel – a promotion to the inner circle of barristers allowing the letters QC to be added after his name.

    It’s called “taking silk” after the material in the gown a QC wears in court. Being a QC opens the way for a barrister to become a judge and with it the eventual possibility of a knighthood.

    Roger Everest couldn’t help noticing that there was a masonic connection in Elias’ appointment.

    The man who had an important say in appointing QCs in Wales, Mr Justice Leonard, was then presiding judge of the Wales and Chester circuit.

    Elias’ appointment was made by the Queen on the advice of Lord Hailsham, then Lord Chancellor, but on the recommendation of the Presiding Judge of the circuit.

    Mr Justice Leonard was a mason.

    (He was also infamous as the judge in the 1987 Ealing vicarage case where he handed down shorter sentences for rape than for aggravated burglary.)

    Two years later, in 1986, it was the turn of Winston Roddick to “take silk”.

    Elias and Roddick are well-respected advocates who would no doubt have been awarded silk without any masonic connections.

    However, Roger Everest claims that Eifion Morgans, who died in 1987, told him that their advancement was made easier by the fact the two barristers had met Leonard at masonic functions.

    Roddick became master of Dinas Llandaf in 1983 and was followed a year later by Elias.
    GERARD ELIAS QCDid his membership of Dinas Llandaf accelerate his appointment as a QC?

    GERARD ELIAS QC
    Did his membership of Dinas Llandaf accelerate his appointment as a QC?

    In 1997 Elias was appointed lead counsel to the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal.

    A year later Winston Roddick was appointed Counsel General to the National Assembly for Wales.

    On his appointment, he resigned from freemasonry and has never rejoined.

    In 2003, when Roddick’s term of office came to an end, Roger Everest was intrigued to note that the man nominated for the £140,000 a year job by the Civil Service Commissioners in London was … Gerard Elias QC.

    However, First Minister Rhodri Morgan, a Labour politician with an ardent anti-masonic reputation, put his foot down.

    Morgan said “I did not register any over-riding objection to the shortlist, although I did comment on the fact that one candidate, subsequently recommended for appointment by the panel, was a prominent freemason.”

    “I was, however, prepared to waive my concern on this issue, noting that the candidate was prepared to resign from the freemasonry, as did the previous general counsel on appointment.”

    “When the permanent secretary advised me of the recommendation from the panel and I read the full papers, I became aware of information not previously available to me that the recommended candidate was also a board member of the Independent Supervisory Authority for Hunting.”

    Elias had joined the board of the Independent Supervisory Authority for Hunting ISAH. Another member of ISAH was Sir Ronald Waterhouse, the former High Court judge who chaired the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of which Elias was leading counsel.

    The First Minister vetoed the appointment because “I judged that the legal advice of a Counsel General prominently associated with these two controversial issues would not carry the necessary stamp of untramelled authority throughout the Assembly.”
    THE DINAS Llandaf Lodge meets five times a year in Cardiff. The entry in the 2009-10 South Wales provincial yearbook names 34 of the current membership of 40. They are:S R Adam • A A Attard • F G Bottarini • G Bull • D Davies • J A Davies • G Elias, QC • B M Etherington • S Evans • K T Flynn, OBE • F A Green • P M M Grimson • J Hermer • E Howells • P S R Jamison • F A Jones • G A Jones • Gwilyn H Jones • G J Jones • M S Lewis • K P Malloy • P R Marshall, OBE • W G D Morgan • P A L Mount • N H B Payne • P G Powell • J W Reed • Neil J Richards • J W Richards • N J Richards • J S Sidoli • C M Williams • P M Williams, OBE • C E Yandell

    DINAS LLANDAF, Lodge No 8512
    THE LODGE meets five times a year in Cardiff. The entry in the 2009-10 South Wales provincial yearbook names 34 of the current membership of 40. They are:
    S R Adam • A A Attard • F G Bottarini • G Bull • D Davies • J A Davies • G Elias, QC • B M Etherington • S Evans • K T Flynn, OBE • F A Green • P M M Grimson • J Hermer • E Howells • P S R Jamison • F A Jones • G A Jones • Gwilyn H Jones • G J Jones • M S Lewis • K P Malloy • P R Marshall, OBE • W G D Morgan • P A L Mount • N H B Payne • P G Powell • J W Reed • Neil J Richards • J W Richards • N J Richards • J S Sidoli • C M Williams • P M Williams, OBE • C E Yandell

    Elias hit back saying he had never been to a hunt and had joined ISAH because of his disciplinary expertise in cricket. He had offered to resign from the organisation – and freemasonry – if it was felt there was any conflict of interest.

    He denied that he was a “prominent” freemason and said he had not been an active mason for seven years.

    This statement was made in March 2004. This suggests that he gave up being an active mason in 1997, the year when the public hearings of the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal began.

    Rebecca Television checked the Dinas Llandaf entries in the provincial yearbooks. In every year Elias is shown as a subscribing past master of the lodge which meant that he continued to pay his dues and remained a mason. He is still listed in the 2009-10 edition.

    Elias accepted the First Minister’s decision to veto his appointment but added: “Whether … the First Minister’s personal objections to my appointment are proper considerations, either as a matter of public law, or even as a matter of fairness and justice to a candidate, I leave for others to judge.”

    Roger Everest tried to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights but the Secretariat refused to hear it.

    Rebecca Television e-mailed Gerard Elias about Everest’s claims. He did not reply.

    We asked Rhodri Morgan to comment. He told us he didn’t want to talk about the issue.

    WINSTON RODDICK was elected police commissioner for North Wales last November. The article A Fistful of Coppers charts some of the controversy that surrounded his election.

    ♦♦♦

    BROTHERS IN SILK

  262. Dear Len
    This is just to give you an update about the current circumstances relating to Simon Oliver’s litigation in the High Court. The judge hearing the case on the 27th of July 2020 called Justice Nicklin and his clerk say that they have not received a signed affidavit from me when I uploaded it electronically and I have a receipt for it. After I provided the receipt to justice Nicklins clerk, the matter was ignored again. In a separate matter, the government legal department lawyer Miss Louisa Lloyd Jones has also blocked any attachments that could come from me. I have sent 9 emails with attachments and including repeat emails and none have gone through. I have sent her screenshots of these emails and the error messages i received and her response is that she does not understand my email. I think this is just an attempt by the High Court and the government legal department to have my affidavit thrown out by playing these games that they haven’t received it. On a separate note, I have reported the matter to the police about the false accusation of anthrax attacks. This has been logged as a hate crime and i have also reported Matrix Chambers and the government legal departments legal team for Oliver as well. It’s sickening the amount of corruption that Simon Oliver will do and how much the government legal department and the Ministry of Justice will support him in it. I guess the next step would be to copy and paste my affidavit in to the comments of this site because then I know they definitely have received it.

    I can confirm that everything that I have said about is the truth and the best of my knowledge.
    Signed
    Mr J Sheikh

  264. We see this type of MAFIA-LIKE activity in the courts all the time. This is how the corrupt legal fraternity operates EVERY DAY – particularly in cases where they are stealing property. They have corrupt clerks and court managers operating from inside the courts in every strategic position and cases are earmarked to fail. It is a criminal operation. They do it to thousands of people and have been doing it for many decades at least. I think they are finally onto Heaton, which is why he is leaving.

  265. Lennie

    I have repeated time and time again that they didn’t want you opening the (buried) toxic air syndrome
    can of worms as it would open very large and expensive flood gates for claims by front line airline staff.
    So, the peons and useful idiots were all lined up to screw you into the ground.

    Accordingly, things went missing, the police in varying degrees of seniority were coerced to bend facts
    and evidence, HMRC hard boys were let loose all supported by bent members of the judiciary (and their
    known affiliates in the masons) in collusion with compliant members of the medical profession in order
    to keep you drugged up to the eyeballs and de-railed broke and washed up – and finished, flat on your
    back with nothing. Even your ex-wife’s solicitor Graeme Fraser was in on the act (probably – bet there’s
    a connection there somewhere that we will find)

    But, they all made a serious mistake …. they under-estimated you and us. Badly.

    And quite rightly, you’re on your feet, fighting and now slowly and patiently turning the screw on their
    nuts. Good. When this little lot comes out in the open, which I think it might (assuming you don’t go for
    a compensation package based on an nda) it will make a marvelously rich source of material for a tv
    documentary and/or a book !

    I’ve often wondered who was ultimately behind all of this; the airline companies, or, the insurance
    companies that stood to pay out millions in compensation.

    Because I’d bet hard cash that they’re the ones who were driving it – and they’re the ones who ultimately
    deserve a coup de grâce.

    Chicksands

  266. Simon Oliver actually wanted to settle with Len and liasing with a fellow Freemason to contact Len. Obviously Len is not like Simon Oliver and wanted justice which Simon Oliver cannot provide because that’s not his role. Len has maintained the moral high ground in all of this and has fought his case with the utmost pride and dignity for not his own benefit but those of the people who could not speak and fight.

    The MoJ should be thankful they are dealing with just one blog. It could be worse! We could create a database of bad judges with the comments enabled so that the public can review the conduct of all judges. Maybe this way we can all see which lodge each judge is in and how they relate to other lodges.

    Simon Oliver is what we refer to as a ‘Mashed potato’ and a very small problem.

    Enjoy the show

  267. Protecting the Vulnerable?

    by Sam Smith on June 15, 2011

    Post image for Protecting the Vulnerable?

    The recent case of Steven Neary is the tip of the iceberg. Mark Neary is to be commended for winning his case, but the grim truth is that he is an exception and not the rule.

    The last two years have seen an explosion in awareness of an overbearing state. Under Labour, poorly drafted and shoddy laws gave public bodies wildly unchecked powers to lock people up and control their lives. Clumsy, bureaucratic and expensive legislation has put layer upon layer of hurdles in the way of people seeking to exercise their rights. Many forthright and well meaning people have talked about the problems but the only solutions proposed so far will worsen the problem. The recent announcement that councils will be required to have adult safeguarding boards utterly misses the point. In the Neary case the council claimed to be ‘safeguarding’ when they took Steven into care and kept him there unlawfully.

    The law needs to recognise that people working for state bodies are only human and as error prone as the rest of us, and that often people will need safeguarding from the state. Remedies need to be cheap, simple and quick – not expensive, slow and complicated.

    This article is not about problems. It is about solutions. The purpose of this article is to set out some specific policy proposals to make the Court of Protection and related institutions cheaper and more accessible to service users. It is my hope that these proposals will filter through to wiser and more knowledgeable souls who will build upon it. Readers of Anna’s blog are invited to comment and if we later publish a proper policy paper we will try to credit suggestions –

    1. Court of Protection Procedures

    Unlike Mental Health Review Tribunals, the Court of Protection is a full blown court making use of its own rules and also the Civil Procedure Rules. Typically both solicitors and barristers are required but due to the lack of legal aid many applicants are litigants in person.

    It is proposed –

    a. the Court of Protection rules be re-written and modelled along the Small Claims track of the County Court, for example in terms of the rules of evidence. Typically parties should only need solicitors.
    b. like a Tribunal the Court should be under a strict duty to assist a litigant in person.
    c. as now costs should not be awarded in welfare cases. This rule should be extended to some limited financial cases, in particular in complaints about the conduct of a property and affairs deputy or applications by P to discharge a deputy.
    d. In general the Court should have the powers of the High Court but the accessibility of a very helpful County Court Judge in the Small Claims track.
    e. the overriding duty of the Court should be set out as being first to protect P’s autonomy as far as possible and second to protect P’s interests.

    2. Litigation Capacity

    A disturbing trend has arisen of local authorities using the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to find litigants incapable, for example in the infamous Rachel Pullen case. Unfortunately the procedures are vague and there is no clearly defined procedure for challenging a finding of incapacity. This procedure needs to be cleared up and a low bar for the test of capacity needs to be set with the opportunity for review of capacity from time to time.

    The problem is that again Britain lags behind largely because civil servants sulk whenever the Europeans point out problems with out procedures. Most European countries have procedures for restoring and contesting litigation capacity.

    Oddly, in Mental Health Review Tribunals there appears to be little evidence of the appointment of litigation friends. Applicants whose cases are meritless or tainted by insane arguments, ‘the Pixies did it!’ simply lose or are dealt with under case management procedures. There is an argument that the concept of litigation friend should not exist and these are the proposals for reform –

    a. in any court or tribunal, where a person is found to lack litigation capacity or the ability to instruct a lawyer the Official Solicitor be appointed as a Party. However unlike now the protected party should still be able to make applications to the Court in person (for example if they disagree with the Offical Solicitor).
    b. where a party is deemed to lack capacity to instruct a lawyer, but can nevertheless find one to act pro-bono then they are to be allowed to instruct that lawyer and the court must hear any application made.
    c. meritless applications may be dealt with under case management procedures, but the court will be under a strict duty to assist any application or representation made by a protected party whether in person or through counsel.
    d. where a person who lacks capacity appoints a McKenzie friend the ordinary rules for McKenzie friends will apply and in addition the McKenzie friend will have automatic rights of audience.
    e. in considering a finding of incapacity of any party no court or tribunal may consider expert witness evidence that is to the effect that the party lacks capacity unless that expert is instructed solely by the party alleged to lack capacity or solely by the court or tribunal.

    3. Right to Independent Expert

    At present there are fears that experts may be subject to what academics call ‘repeat player prejudice’. Simply put, expert witnesses get a lot of work from councils and may not wish to upset them for fear of losing future work.

    a. it is proposed that in any proceedings where capacity is an issue, where a public authority’s expert opinion is disputed the Court will instruct its own expert and include in that instruction any factual assertions made by the protected party.
    b. the protected party will be allowed further opinions at a reasonable interval. E.g, once every 6 months in the first 12 months, and once a year thereafter.

    4. Inspection Regime

    Inspection regimes need to be quick, simple and fair. Punishments need to be harsh but only imposed on the guilty as a system will only deter wrong doing and encourage best practise if it accurately identifies both.

    a. self assessment of all care homes and services should end.
    b. the CQC should publish mandatory care standards (e.g. cleanliness of toilets, food, availability of activities, complaints procedures etc.)
    c. all inspections should be unannounced.
    d. inspectors should be able to impose spot fines. Private providers care about money. Appeals should be to the First Tier Tribunal.
    e. inspectors should have the power to infiltrate and film in care providers in the same way as Panorama did. If the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act needs to be changed then let it be changed.
    f. the CQC should be given power and duty to prosecute for offences under section 44 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. This power and duty should also given to the police, but not to local authorities. Local authorities should only have the power to refer offences under section 44 to the police or to the CQC.
    g. the CQC should be given the power and duty to refer professionals for fitness to practise hearings if their inspections uncover serious wrongdoing.
    h. private sector care providers should be given a tax break if they avoid any spot fines in a financial year.

    5. Complaints Procedures

    Human beings make mistakes. They cling to them often out of fear of punishment or disadvantage if they admit to the original error. This is the root of most disputes with councils. Public body complaints procedures often do not work because there is no incentive in complaints procedures to settle early. There must be an incentive to acquiesce to complaints and a disincentive to deal with complaints poorly.

    a. Where a complaint to a public body is made and the body promptly accepts that complaint and rectifies the problem in a manner satisfactory to the claimant then there should be a reward in terms of limited protection from punishment.

    i. The body should be exempt to the first £5,000 of a claim for damages arising from any non-pecuniary loss.
    ii. That any professional involved should not be referred to fitness to practise proceedings for negligence. No such immunity would apply for malice and misconduct (e.g. abuse).

    b. Where a complaint to a public body is made and not accepted and a claim for damages is successful then a court may have the power to increase the damages by up to 25%. This is not punitive but instead reflects the cost to the court system of public sector obstinacy. The court will be required to consider the thoroughness, reasonableness and independence of the process used to consider the complaint.

    So for example in the Neary case had the council caved in to Mr Neary’s first complaint then the council would have received immunity to the first £5,000 of a claim for damages in distress and a presumption that the mistakes of the professionals were minor and should be overlooked absent other evidence. This would have given them a strong incentive to consider the case carefully and fix the problems much earlier.

    Impact Assessment.

    The current framework for the Court of Protection imposes fabulous legal costs on local authorities, whether they be right or wrong in any given case. By simplifying CoP procedures and requiring only solicitors, legal costs for councils and other public bodies will be substantially reduced and can be spent on improving care. Accessibility for clients will also be improved.

    Private sector care providers care about money. Spot fines are a quick easy way to deal with problems. Tax breaks for a clean report will make sure that care managers worry about standards.

    Public sector complaints procedures are often meaningless because they tend to rely on human beings admitting to mistakes. Giving an incentive to settle matters quickly will radically improve matters.

    Sam Smith.

    Edited by Anna to add: Do please take the opportunity to comment, and forward it on to anyone you know who has an interest in these matters – it will be going before the Minister. It is an excellent opportunity to put your point of view – and good work by Sam smith, who has been a diligent campaigner.

    { 22 comments more }https://annaraccoon.com/2011/06/15/protecting-the-vulnerable/

  268. Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 13:31, len lawrence wrote:

    To: Sir Jonathan Jones
    HM Procurator General, Permanent Secretary, Government Legal Department.

    Re: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver appointed President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    Dear HM Procurator General.

    My request to Government Legal Services, Matrix Chambers and Worshipful Brother His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver to withdraw the false allegations made against me in HHJ Simon Oliver’s Civil
    Action against Mr. Javed Sheikh has been stonewalled.

    Mr Sheikh please find attached an extract from a court hearing at Reading County Court when
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver announced his appointment as President of the Queen’s Bench
    Division. It is still not known how many cases HHJ Simon Oliver heard at Reading County Court
    in the mistaken belief that he was President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    It is also known that prior to hearing my case on the 16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    was fully aware that I was a Court of Protection patient. HHJ Simon Oliver disregarded this and
    without a Court of Protection authorisation proceeded to hear the application for permission to
    appeal when permission was not required.

    How many Court of Protection hearings has HHJ Simon Oliver heard over a four year period, prior
    to his appointment on the 7 October 2015 to the Court of Protection, is also still unknown.

    The Ministry of Justice, HMCTS and The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) has been fully
    aware of what has been occurring at Reading County Court. The matter is compounded given that
    on February 2018 Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary announced in a report that THAMES
    VALLEY POLICE are failing to record more than 35,000 crimes per year, including serious crimes such
    as rape, sexual offences, domestic violence. This is in addition to an earlier Crime Data Integrity
    inspection in 2017 detailing that vulnerable victim’s crimes were not being recorded.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  269. I heard a rumour where he once claimed he was the managing director of weight watchers.

  270. Racketeering and asset stripping is the reason state agents refuse to properly safeguard the elderly and vulnerable.

    Lord Hardie (House of Lords): “The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being wilfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them.
    https://www.anthonycollins.com/newsroom/ebriefings/deprivation-of-liberty-safeguards-not-fit-for-purpose/

  271. Former Tory justice minister to chair independent JR review

    By Monidipa Fouzder31 July 2020

    The government has today followed up on its 2019 manifesto commitment to end the ‘abuse’ of judicial review by announcing the launch of an independent review to be chaired by a former Conservative justice minister.

    Lord chancellor Robert Buckland said judicial review protects citizens from an ‘overbearing state’. The independent review ‘will ensure this precious check on government power is maintained, while making sure the process is not abused or used to conduct politics by another means’.

    Latest civil justice statistics show that the Ministry of Justice had the most judicial reviews lodged against any department or public body in 2019: 1,100, down 7% on 2018. The Home Office had the second largest number – 976, down 17% on 2018. Of the 3,400 judicial review applications received last year, 1,600 were civil immigration and asylum applications, 1,600 were civil (other) and 170 were criminal.

    For the review, a six-strong panel will consider: whether the terms of judicial review should be written into law; whether certain executive decisions should be decided on by judges; which grounds and remedies should be available in claims brought against the government; and any further procedural reforms such as timings and the appeal process.

    Source: Mary Turner – The Times

    The panel will be chaired by Lord Faulks QC (Edward Peter Lawless Faulks), who served as a justice minister under David Cameron from January 2014 until July 2016. Parliament’s website states that he has been non-affiliated since 30 July 2019.

    Faulks said: ‘I am delighted to have been asked to chair the Independent Review of Administrative Law. The panel will bring a wide range of experience and opinion to this important subject. Together we will examine judicial review and the need to strike a balance between the right of citizens to challenge government through the courts and the elected government’s right to govern.’

    The other panel members are: Professor Carol Harlow QC, Vikram Sachdeva QC, Professor Alan Page, Celina Colquhoun, and Nick McBride.

    Harlow is an Emeritus professor of law at LSE. Sachdeva is chair of the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association. Page’s previous roles include specialist adviser to the Scottish Parliament’s Scotland Bill committee. Barrister Colquhoun specialises in planning and environmental law. McBride is a fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge.

    The ministry says the panel will report back later this year. Any recommendations will be considered by Buckland and Michael Gove, chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster and Cabinet Office minister.

    Dr Joe Tomlinson, research director at Public Law Project, told the Gazette: ‘Judicial review exists to help ensure that public authorities act lawfully and that citizens are treated fairly and according to the law. Any process of reform is, therefore, a very serious undertaking.

    ‘It is right that the government has highlighted the importance of examining data and evidence as part of this review. There is, however, at present a notable deficit in relevant, authoritative data about judicial review, both in terms of procedure and judicial decision-making.

    ‘Evidence-based policymaking – for which this government has repeatedly stated its support – demands high standards in terms of evidence and data, and requires serious reflection and consideration, particularly where it relates to issues of such constitutional significance. It will be important that this process of reform identifies where evidence gaps exist and ensures that steps are taken to acquire the necessary data.’

    The choice of a former Conservative minister to chair the independent review has attracted some adverse comment on social media. The Secret Barrister tweeted: ‘Lord Faulks QC was the right-hand minister to Chris Grayling at the MoJ from 2014, when legal aid was obliterated and Grayling was attempting to restrict judicial review, branding it “a promotional tool for left-wing campaigners”.

    ‘There’s nothing like an impartial tribunal.’

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/former-tory-justice-minister-to-chair-independent-jr-review/5105251.article

    Anonymous
    Commented on:31 July 2020 11:34am

    And in other news Count Dracula has been appointed to be in charge of the Blood Bank.

  272. Appointment of the Master of the Rolls
    31 July 2020 |News

    The Prime Minister’s Office have announced that Her Majesty The Queen has been pleased to approve the appointment of The Rt. Hon. Sir Geoffrey Vos as the Master of the Rolls from 11 January 2021. This appointment will follow the retirement of Sir Terence Etherton.

    The Master of the Rolls is the second most senior judge in England and Wales after the Lord Chief Justice. As President of the Court of Appeal’s Civil Division the Master of the Rolls is responsible for the deployment and organisation of the work of the judges of the division as well as presiding in its courts, often hearing the most complex cases across the full range of civil, family and tribunal matters.

    The Master of the Rolls is Head of Civil Justice, and as such is Chair of the Civil Justice Council and Civil Procedure Rule Committee, with responsibility for the development and oversight of the wider civil justice system.

    The position dates to at least the 13th century. Reflecting the role’s historic roots, but also the ongoing importance of public access to records and data for the rule of law, the Master of the Rolls is Chair of the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives.

    Biography

    Sir Geoffrey Vos was called to the Bar in 1977, and took silk (QC) in 1993. He was appointed as a Justice of the High Court assigned to the Chancery Division in October 2009. Between 2005 – 2009 he was a Judge of the Courts of Appeal of Jersey and Guernsey, and a Judge of the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands between 2008 and 2009. He sat as a Deputy High Court Judge from 1999 until 2009. He was the Chairman of the Bar Council in 2007. He became President of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary in January 2015.

    He was appointed as a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2013 and became Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales on 24 October 2016.

    Appointment of the Master of the Rolls

  273. Hi, i am surprised reading all these allegations on this website about HHJ Simon Oliver. His Honour was very professional in my hearing and had the most professional conduct during my litigation. He was respectful, accomodating and his orders were always error free and barely required amendments. An absolute privilege to have his honour hear my case. Everyone here is bonkers to say otherwise. Most seem to have drug and alcohol problems who cannot accept his honours criticisms.
    No need to reply
    Regards

  274. You must be a bit more than a publisher if you know when judicial orders are “error free and rarely requiring amendments”. How on earth would you ever know without meeting someone whether they had drug and alcohol problems? It’s seems to me that you are the one who is bonkers. How many court cases have you put before Simon Oliver to acquire such impressive expertise?

  275. Hi
    Was he acting as a family judge or the president of the Queens Bench Division? We wonder why you had such a positive experience? May we ask what gift you gave him? Or what Freemason lodge your in? Or even better, what solicitors or barristers firm you work for? It may explain a lot! Please don’t come here and bash other victims when you have your own hidden agenda. Your a bit late in the day to be sticking up for HHJ Simon Oliver. We think we would rather consider 2300 comments then one delusional from you.
    Best regards

  276. Corruption, duplicity major challenge in UK: Swraj Paul

    Terming corruption a ‘major challenge’ facing Britain, prominent industrialist Swraj Paul on Monday came down heavily on the ‘cosy and sleazy’ practices of institutions that are supposed to act fairly and treat equally in society.
    world

    Updated: Nov 25, 2014 17:02 IST

    Prasun Sonwalkar
    Hindustan Times

    Terming corruption a ‘major challenge’ facing Britain, prominent industrialist Swraj Paul on Monday came down heavily on the ‘cosy and sleazy’ practices of institutions that are supposed to act fairly and treat equally in society.

    Swraj, who is chairman of the Caparo Group, stepped down as the chancellor of the University of Westminster, had a ‘special word’ for graduating students during his last address at the graduation ceremony here.

    “To my mind, the major challenge facing Britain today is the social disease of corruption that has plagued this country possibly for decades. Only now is it being exposed. When the truth emerges – as I hope it will – I believe it will have a seismic effect on British society,” he said.

    Paul added: “Cozy and sleazy establishment practices have for too long exerted an undue and malign influence on the very institutions that are expected to protect us; institutions that are supposed to see that we are all treated equally and fairly. In many instances the watchdogs of society have become the predators, or allowed predators a free hand”.

    Activities such as those of financial institutions and their practices, or the more recently uncovered implications that paedophilia rings had ‘shamefully’ operated for years at high levels, diminished British society and its system of government, Paul said.

    “British financial institutions were once perceived as world leaders in integrity. Now they are seen as world leaders in duplicity.

    While they are all still clamouring for their huge salaries and bonuses, not one person in the financial world has even apologised to the millions of people who were badly affected by the banking crisis six years ago”, he added.

    A member of the House of Lords, Paul had strong words for parliamentarians too.

    “Our Parliamentarians and those who hold public office are the professed defenders of our morality. Yet it seems that immorality has been condoned at the highest levels. Public trust in the pillars of our society has steadily eroded. A nation which tolerates this kind of malfeasance is a nation destined for decline,” he said.

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/bytedance-says-faces-complex-difficulties-accuses-facebook-of-plagiarism/story-I2JUW2hNDpJnpATRvgmcaM.html

  283. The part transcript here displayed is from my case not that of the person claiming it; The posting was not authorised by myself and I do not know the author.

    There is a pending court case in which this transcript will feature.

  284. Dear John Abbott, sorry for the typos, yes this is your transcript and not mine. I was referring to the fact that hhj simon oliver is not the president but just a measily family judge!

  285. I heard a rumour that judge Simon Oliver once said that he was the performance director for the department of health and was in charge of combatting obesity in the UK

  286. Wake up people, Mr Sheikh did plan an anthrax attack of his honour judge Oliver, why would the High court and the publishers risk being sued in court if it wasn’t true? It was nothing to do with Mr Sheikh being Muslim, this is a card he is using to justify his position. As a doctor who works in the NHS, he has access to such chemicals which his honour could of had been used on him. His honour judge Oliver is lucky to be alive at the hands of this lunatic. Deport him end of.

  287. Dear Geoffrey

    I have been informed about your comment above and thought i would clarify my position.

    Firstly, i never plotted any Attack on Simon Oliver. THIS IS A CARD HE IS USING TO JUSTIFY HIS OWN POSITION AS A VICTIM. Have you wondered why he never reported it to the police? I know i reported it to the police that he falsely accused me.

    Secondly, Simon Oliver is known to be lying regularly in court. I don’t think this requires any kind of input from me because it’s quite obvious. It’s a shame people like you use victim bashing as an agenda to stick up for man who does not even have control of his own marital life, let alone what he does in court.

    Thirdly, it is not possible to get anthrax or any sort of chemicals which is used for terrorism in any capacity from an NHS hospital. Please go back to skool and lurn sumfing this time.

    Fourth, before you come up on this website or anywhere on the internet for that matter and use my name in a negative stance, get your facts straightened out. If you can’t speak the truth about me, don’t say anything at all. I dedicated my life in the NHS to save other people’s lives including delusional ones like yourself. I don’t think Simon Oliver will have a care in the world about anyone else’s life. If you think he does, go to him next time you fall ill and see what he does.

    Fifth, Simon Oliver has already admitted in point 32 of his witness statement in the High court that the allegations that I made against him taking a bribe in the Upper Tribunal oral hearing was in fact correct. Simon Oliver said that the contents of the hearing that is mentioned on the main article of this site are only known to the people who were physically present in the Upper tribunal oral hearing. Therefore, he is admitting that his judgement he made was FALSE! This is now a fact

    Finally, tell your mother not to take drugs or alcohol during her pregnancy so that she does not have spastic kids like yourself who make retarded comments on the internet about innocent people.

    Sincerely
    Mr Sheikh

  290. Sir Jonathan Jones QC
    HM Procurator General,
    Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Profession and Crown’s Nominee
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION

    Thank you for your Private Office number 020 72×0 3xx2.

    If I become the subject of any further bullying by lawyers within Government Legal Service I will contact your
    private office immediately.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence

  291. Simon Oliver’s staff at Reading court did not even like him. They considered him stuck up. His attitude was just as bad to the staff in the admin then it is to litigants that are in front of him

  292. Chief Executive Rachel Holmes, Matrix Chambers
    Barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers

    Would you like to inform the those below of the latest false allegations that Worshipful Brother
    HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No.3684 has made against me. My request that my
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver withdraws the false allegations were stonewalled.

    WBo Anthony Howlett-Bolton, The Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire
    WBro Laurence Fretwell, Provincial Grand Secretary
    BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE, NO.3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA,
    United Kingdom
    ProvGSec@berkspgl.org.uk

    Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers you may wish to inform Mr. Justice Julian Knowles and
    Mr. Justice Matthew Nicklin before tomorrows judgement that HHJ Simon Oliver is accurate on
    one point; he has been under surveillance, both inside and outside of Freemasonry.

    To quote from the PROLOUGH page XV, Death of a Hero, Captain Robert Nairac GC
    He had, as one of his officers said, ‘stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’.

    Leonard Lawrence

  293. My take is why is Simon Oliver got an extra large sunbed at the end of his back garden under his tree. Does his fat ass require the extra large one or does he take one of those rent boys back to his place so that his wife can watch them play with each other on the swing

  294. So Thames Valley Police do not know any wrong doings going on in Reading court? You bet your arse they have known all along! Its impossible for them to not have known with the immense support they have given Oliver in the past. They been screwing everyone everywhere at the judicial jokes request

    SHAME ON THE FREEMASONS

  295. Len
    Can you tell me if Freemasons are supposed to be criminals? Its difficult to tell these days with his truly involved in so much of it.
    Kind regards

  296. Len
    Can you tell me if Freemasons are supposed to be criminals?
    —————————————————————————–
    Dear AR

    I believe that the vast majority of Freemasons are not criminals.

    However, not all freemasons are sincere. When these individuals are identified they are invited
    to resign, otherwise they will be kicked out. It all boils down to being a good person and obeying
    the rules of society.

    Another reason for resignation is if Brethren request a letter of demit – in other words, they resign
    their membership. This occurred with some of the members of the London Masonic Lodge that I
    had belonged to, who resigned together with other freemasons. The trigger for the resignations was
    the misconduct of the Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver and those that sought to defend him.

    Provincial Executive Berkshire Freemasonry consists of the following:
    Provincial Grand Master Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Deputy Provincial Grand Master
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master
    Provincial Senior Grand Warden
    Provincial Junior Grand Warden
    Provincial Grand Secretary
    Provincial Grand Director of Ceremonies

    The Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire is the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton OBE.
    The Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton I believe was a Chief Superintendent, Thames Valley Police
    Reading, and later a Deputy Chief Constable in the Bedfordshire Police.

    With such a did distinguish police career the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton should easily be able
    to review Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver conduct. However, I believe that my electronic
    communication (emails) to the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton are being blocked.

    Dr. David Staples, Chief Executive & Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    has been made aware of Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver conduct by the former Worshipful
    Master of my former Masonic Lodge in London. Dr. David Staples is senior to the Rt WBr Anthony
    Howlett-Bolton so the responsibility rests with Dr. David Staples and not Rt WBr Howlett-Bolton.
    Dr. David Staples’s office is blocking my emails.

    Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has certainly divided the following:
    1. Freemasons
    2. Police Officers (including those in Thames Valley Police)
    3. The Ministry of Justice
    4. Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service
    5. Court Staff at Reading County Court
    6. The Civil Court of Appeal
    7. The Queens Bench Division
    8.The Crown Prosecution Services.
    9. Judges
    10. Barristers
    11. Solicitors
    12. The Civil Court of Appeal
    13. THE BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE, NO.3684
    14. Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA.

    SURVEILLANCE AND INTELLIGENCE-GATHERING OPERATIONS- COVERT SURVEILLANCE
    He had, as one of his officers said, ‘stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver’s litigation regarding this website judges behaving badly
    was, I understand, authorised and then financed by someone very senior within the Ministry of
    Justice, who may have very recently left. What has not been explained is how the written judgement
    of Mr Justice Julian Knowles appeared on Matrix Chambers website more than a week prior to Mr
    Justice Julian Knowles judgement being handed down in the Queens Bench Division. Perhaps
    Mr Justice Nicklin, Media and Communications List, could enquirer.

    WHILST I AWAIT THE POLICE TO ACTION THE REQUEST FROM THE CROWN PROSECUTION
    SERVICE THAT I BE VISITED, HHJ SIMON OLIVER I CAN NOW EVIDENCE THAT PRIOR TO YOU
    HEARING MY CASE AT READING COUNTY COURT OF THE 16 APRIL 2013 YOU HAD KNOWN THAT
    I WAS A COURT OF PROTECTION PATIENT, BUT YOU WENT AHEAD AND HEARD THE APPLICATION
    AND MADE A JUDGEMENT WHEN YOU DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION.

    I SUGGEST THAT IS WHY YOU TELEPHONED MY BARRISTER AFTER THE HEARING AND HE THEN
    WITHDREW FROM MY CASE, EVEN WHEN YOU WERE INSTRUCTED TO SEND MY CASE TO THE CIVIL
    COURT OF APPEAL. I SUGGEST THAT YOU NEVER INFORMED MASTER MARIA BANCROFT-RIMMER
    CIVIL COURT OF APPEAL OF THE ABOVE.

    WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW SIMON WAS THAT LORD JUSTICE RUPERT JACKSON EMAILED MR JUSTICE
    JACKSON AT THE COURT OF PROTECTION. MY WORSHIPFUL BROTHER SIMON OLIVER WAS SETTING
    ME UP FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER AT THE COURT OF APPEAL!

    EXACTLY HOW MANY COURT OF PROTECTION CASES YOU HEARD AT READING COUNTY COURT
    BETWEEN 2012 AND THE 7 OCTOBER 2015 HAS STILL TO BE ESTABLISHED. SOME OF YOUR VICTIMS
    HAVE CLOSE ASSOCIATIONS WITH HM FORCES [LIKE MYSELF] AND THE POLICE SERVICE. WE
    HAVE ALL LOST OUR HOMES AND SOME THEIR CHILDREN AS WELL!

    LEONARD LAWRENCE
    CC Mr Justice Nicklin, Media and Communications List
    Mr Justice Julian Knowles