——- OPERATION ‘X’——-

HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER 

INTRODUCING A CRIMINAL IN A ROBE

We are back! Unfortunately, cowards and paedophile protectors took our previous website down to protect the criminals that are operating in our judicial offices. Judge Simon Oliver attempted to silence all of the victims by falsifying court orders and court documents as well as bullying and harassing web hosters. It has not worked and we are now back. Louisa Lloyd-Jones from the Government Legal Department and Ben Silverstone from Matrix chambers have been lying and forging documents to take down websites that correctly reports the truth. This form of bullying and harassment might work with web hosters but it will not work with us. We will take our site (and public comments which speaks the truth) and take it to a country with even greater privacy protection. The correct procedure is when thousands of allegations have been made of misconduct against judge Simon Oliver, that Simon Oliver is suspended from duties, then all of his judgements are revisited. Statements should also be taken from litigants addressing concerns and in return Mr Oliver is prosecuted by the Ministry of Justice, the Government Legal Department and the Crown Prosecution Service. However, the reverse seems to be what the Ministry of Justice are doing here and that is to protect the bigger fish. It will not work. We are here for you the public and we will fight for you until the end. In the meantime, please feel free to comment on our new site and distribute it throughout your social media channels.

Welcome to this site which is part of Operation ‘X’. If you have reached here, it must be because a Judge or a lawyer has been up to no good. Well, look no further because we are here to help. Operation ‘X’ is here to help the public against bribery and corruption in the British Judicial system. This site represents the truth against publicly funded criminals and exposes the criminals that operate in our judicial offices.

His Honour Judge Simon Oliver works at the Upper Tribunal in London, Isleworth Crown Court and the family court in Reading and Slough County Courts.

This website deals with HHJ Simon Oliver asking for, accepting and taking bribes to pervert the course of justice. He is racist, extremely corrupt, perverts the course of justice and commits perjury in return for illegal and criminal bribes in the UK court system.

A judge for sale: These are pictures of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver. He is the one who takes bribes using the term ‘gift’. He is the criminal in the court system and eyewitness testimony exists to confirm this and the substantial amounts of comments on this site confirms it further.
The proud Berkshire Freemason in all his glory: Judge Simon Oliver in his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. This is an association he is not supposed to have. His association with the Berkshire Freemasons has clear ramifications on his decision making skills which is evident from this website and other media postings about him online.

On June 24th, 2014, our team were sat in the Upper Tribunal located in the Breams Buildings in London for a case involving an unrepresented member of the public against a government department called the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS). The DBS has functions to bar people from working with children and vulnerable adults. 

At the oral hearing which lasted 4 days, HHJ Simon Oliver asked for a ‘gift’ from the parties concerned. The DBS gave him a gift in the form of a box which was wrapped up in a Sainsbury’s Carrier bag. Since then, HHJ Simon Oliver made a mockery out of the court system and the judgement he gave.

IF YOU HAVE THIS JUDGE IN YOUR CASE, PLEASE NOTE, HE TAKES BRIBES IN THE FORM OF ‘GIFT BOXES’.

IF THE JUDGEMENT YOU RECEIVED IS FILLED WITH LIES, ITS BECAUSE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAS RECEIVED A GIFT THROUGH OTHER MEANS.

IF HE GIVES YOU A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT AND PENALTY, APPEAL IT AS ITS MOST LIKELY HE HAS RECEIVED ‘GIFTS’.

The ‘Gift’ System

ON NOTE, PLEASE BE MINDED, A GIFT IS AN ALTERNATIVE WORD FOR A BRIBE AND INVOLVES MONEY, HOLIDAYS, CRUISES AND JUST ABOUT ANYTHING OF VALUE. HOWEVER, MONEY IS THE MOST COMMON ALONG WITH A NOTE INSIDE THE BOX ABOUT WHAT JUDGEMENT THEY REQUIRE. THE SYSTEM WORKS WHEN ONE LAWYER GIVES THE JUDGE A BOX OR PLACES A BOX SOMEWHERE IN THE COURTROOM WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING. THE COURT CLERK IS USUALLY ALSO INVOLVED. THE BOX IS USUALLY FROM THEIR CLIENT AND CONTAINS SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF MONEY (MINIMUM £8,000). IT IS ALSO COMMON FOR THE DEFENCE LEGAL TEAM TO GET BRIBED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE LEGAL AID FUNDED. ALTERNATIVE WORDS FOR BRIBES ARE ‘LOANS’. WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING, THE BOX GOES MISSING AND A FAVOURABLE JUDGEMENT IS GIVEN BY THE JUDGE TO THE PARTY WHO GAVE THE GIFT OR LOAN TO THEM. THIS IS KNOWN AS ‘THE GIFT SYSTEM’.

This is what took place throughout the 4 day hearing.

Incident in question

On day 1 of the oral hearing:

  • Within 5-10 minutes of the oral hearing initiating, HHJ Simon Oliver puts his hand over the microphone and says ‘Do you have anything for me?’. His head was down at this moment and we believe he was talking to the other side but no one specifically. The DBS barrister ‘BJ’ from Blackstone chambers in London, also putting his hand over the microphone (Only after HHJ Simon Oliver directed he do so with hand gestures) says ‘My client has a gift for you from The Trust’ (from The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust CEO Robert Bell and the Director of HR Carol Johnson). Kevin Brooks from the Treasury Solicitors (TSOL), now called the Government legal department, approaches the judicial bench with a box (the size of a book) in an orange Sainsbury’s carrier bag. HHJ Simon Oliver immediately puts his other hand up whilst his initial hand was still on the microphone and stops Kevin Brooks in his tracks. HHJ Simon Oliver directs his right hand to his left to which Kevin Brooks puts his head down and follows to the end of the judicial bench. Mr Brooks tucks the box in neatly under or behind the bench or a table at the end of the bench away from sight although we could still see a piece of the carrier bag appearing from the area it was placed in. At this moment, a gasp appears in the courtroom about the incident and apparently the way Mr Brooks approached the judicial bench. Michael Flynn (Norwich magistrates court judge), a specialist panel member whom also had his hand on his microphone during this period continued writing something whilst he clearly noticed the event. Janice Funnell (child psychologist from Merton council), another specialist member laughed at the incident. Simon Oliver had an embarrassed smirk on his face as in ‘Have i been caught?’. After this, BJ and HHJ Simon Oliver took their hands off the microphone. We are not sure if Michael Flynn or Janice Funnell had their hands on the microphone at this time as we were not observing them or their hands at this time.
  • The first day of the hearing was not bad. The judiciary seemed straight forward and impartial. Michael Flynn began doing some minor hand gestures towards the end of the day which we did not consider a major problem at the time. He did the hand gestures around 4-5 times (in guise that’s he’s not interested).
  • An adjournment took place around lunchtime at HHJ Simon Oliver’s request. At this time, the DBS barrister BJ asked the appellant that they can leave the courtroom and have a break and to come back in 15 minutes. During this break, the DBS senior management and officials were sat in the back of the courtroom started preparing boxes quickly. Whilst the appellant was outside the courtroom, the DBS senior management (at the request of the DBS CEO Adele Downey), placed a box under the judicial bench. It is unknown what contained in the box but it is very highly likely that it was money in the form of a bribe. When the entire courtroom came back, the DBS senior management and BJ directed to HHJ Simon Oliver that there was ‘something’ under the table for him. HHJ Simon Oliver nodded in acceptance but did not approach the area of the judicial bench where the DBS senior management were pointing towards. 
  • Towards the end of the hearing on the first day when the judiciary were retiring, HHJ Simon Oliver, Janice Funnell and Michael Flynn stood up to leave and were partly gone through the back door. Janice Funnell was the first one to leave through the back door and HHJ Simon Oliver was partly through the back door and Michael Flynn was in the process of going through the back door. That is when Kevin Brooks of the TSOL and unknown members in the back of the court room uttered some words (unknown to what it was) and pointed out to the box under the judicial bench/table. To this, HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Oh yeah’ and directed Michael Flynn pick up the box as Michael Flynn was the last one to leave through the back door. Michael Flynn picked both boxes casually and put it with the rest of the items in his hand and left through the back door. At this incident, there was a gasp in the back of the courtroom in shock. HHJ Simon Oliver in the meantime had a grin on his face pretending he didn’t know what he was doing. We are unsure if it was the same boxes that were placed in the morning and the early afternoon as it was picked up quite quickly and Michael Flynns back was also turned towards us during this time. If we remember correctly, it was exactly the same boxes as the boxes that were placed there previously did not appear to be there any longer. Michael Flynn placed one box under his left arm and another box in his left hand with a folder and notepad and quietly left through the back door.

On day 2 of the oral hearing:

  • On the second day of the hearing, substantial number of hand gestures started off by HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn was more proficient in the hand gestures and he also made facial expressions and gasping noises throughout the day. HHJ Simon Oliver just did hand gestures.
  • The box in the carrier bag was no longer visible from where we were sitting and we believe the box was removed the day earlier was the same box that was no longer there. The second box, we could not see at all.
  • By the end of the morning before lunch, we noticed Michael Flynn give an excess of 30 hand gestures in the form of a wave insinuating he is not interested in the appellants case and the defences. HHJ Simon Oliver did minor hand gestures, probably around 5-10 during this same period.
  • A witness called JR was being cross examined. During the cross examination, Michael Flynn puts his hand over the microphone and asked the appellant to change the question nearly 5-10 times. HHJ Simon Oliver agreed to this. Michael Flynn also continued his hand gestures to another 40-50 in the afternoon. HHJ Simon Oliver also did the same at around 20 times.
  • Michael Flynn started doing facial expressions by moving his head away in a gesture that he is not interested or he is not listening. This happened nearly 30-40 times in the afternoon alone.
  • Michael Flynn started questioning JR about the job but that is as far as his specialist knowledge went. He was actually learning from the witnesses rather than agreeing or disagreeing with the specialist element. Michael Flynn also put his hand up during the appellants cross examination of JR stating he wants to listen to JR and not the appellant. Simon Oliver did the same in addition to Michael Flynn.
  • During the afternoon hearing. Michael Flynn threw his pen on the judicial bench several times, around 10 times in a gesture that he’s fed up of listening to the appellant speak. A racist comment was made at this time that ‘Your the type of person who should just be working at a petrol station’. This was by Michael Flynn and is a racial slur. Due to the appellants unrepresented nature, they didn’t know how to respond. Michael Flynn also tried to put words in their mouth.
  • The appellant spoke in regards to a golliwog matter where staff members at the former employer were carrying golliwogs and the management of the hospital took no action against the perpetrators. HHJ Simon Oliver said to this remark with his hand once again on the microphone ‘Golliwogs are not a racist, it was at once inappropriate’. Michael Flynn had a stern look on his face and nodded yes.
  • During JRs cross examination, HHJ Simon Oliver said to JR ‘Would you like his name on the internet if BJ upholds this case?’. JR responds by saying ‘Well, most hospitals are aware of him and to stay away from him’. HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘That’s good’. This was incredibly concerning as this was an actual request by the judge to one of the witnesses. We do not believe hands were on any microphones at this time so it may have been recorded although HHJ Simon Oliver kept his distance from the microphone quite a bit.
  • Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver puts their hands over the microphone about 3 times whilst they whispered to one another without any other party involved what they were discussing. 

On day 3 of the oral hearing:

  • During the cross examination of GB, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver carried on their hand gestures. Michael Flynn may have carried out 50-60 hand gestures, 20 pen throws on his desk, 30 facial expressions and moving his head away and 2 whispers with Simon Oliver. Michael Flynns hands were once again on the microphone several times that we could not count the amount of times he did it. The same with HHJ Simon Oliver where he nodded his head around 5 times and waved his hand about 20 times.
  • When the appellant questioned GB about JRs statement ‘well, JR said in her statement that……..?’. The appellant was immediately interrupted by Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver saying ‘ no, no, no ,no ,no’ and tapping and banging their hands on the table. Michael Flynn once again nodding several times. HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘That’s now 5 times you have misquoted’. In fact, the appellant did not misquote, it was an actual statement in JRs statement. The hand gestures were far greater on this day and nothing the appellant was saying was being heard.
  • A witness called GB was very honest and said that the appellant has to give the judge a gift if they want a favoured judgement. To this remark, HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand on the microphones and told GB ‘No, no, no!’ and ‘shhhh’ to prevent the appellant finding out what happened earlier on.
  • Michael Flynn started an allegation about the appellant not being qualified and that the appellant lied to an agency they were working with. The appellant stated that a clinical specialist does not have to be qualified and they can practice with an equivalent and they did not lie to any agency or anyone for that matter. Michael Flynn stated ‘Your not qualified’ about 15 times and ‘Yes, you did lie’ about 10 times. This was based on no evidence. The appellant said ‘well, the agency are specialists and they never said that’. Michael Flynn states ‘What, they are more specialist then me!’. The appellant said ‘I don’t know what your knowledge of the field is’. Michael Flynn states ‘Well, that should tell you then’ very rudely whilst still doing hand gestures and putting his hand over microphones. Michael Flynn then asks BJ and the TSOL to ask The Trust ‘Whether the appellant needs to be qualified’. If Michael Flynn was a specialist, he should have no problem answering this question himself rather than asking The Trust. Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver said to the appellant ‘Don’t worry, this isn’t going to form part of the judgement, we just want to know for ourselves, its all OK, don’t worry about it’. HHJ Simon Oliver said ‘Yes, don’t worry, its OK’. The response from The Trust came back that the appellant does not have to be qualified to practice so therefore the appellant was correct all along although the judgement does not report this and only reports the fabricated version.
  • When the appellant was being cross examined and was in the dock, HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn said ‘Move closer to the microphone, we want to capture all the content so there are not mistakes whilst their hands were on the microphone themselves.
  • Michael Flynn did 3 hand gestures during the appellants cross examination and nearly 20 times rolling his eyes and moving his face in annoyance. HHJ Simon Oliver at this time sat back smirking and grinning behind his hand.
  • Towards the end of the days hearing, HHJ Simon Oliver asked the DBS barrister BJ using hand gestures, whilst his other hand was on the microphone once again about the box that was placed in the corner of the bench on the first day. HHJ Simon Oliver was trying to see if the appellant knew about what happened so that Mr Oliver can protect himself better. BJ said ‘So you gave Mr ‘KA’ a bribe?’ . The appellant responded and said ‘no, i did no such thing. it was a fee KA requested for an employment reference’. On that note, Mr Oliver seemed satisfied that he was protected.

On day 4 of the oral hearing:

  • This day summing up was occurring. BJ spent over 30 minutes we believe on his summing up.
  • HHJ Simon Oliver said to BJ that the appellant was a ‘deserted rat’ to which Michael Flynn nodded his head.
  • When the appellant was summing up their case, Michael Flynn was waving his hand again about 20-30 times as though he is not interested, HHJ Simon Oliver did it 3 times.
  • Michael Flynn shouted out at the appellant during summing up ‘What, you want to work in a hospital?’. The appellant said ‘Yes, i do and i didn’t harm any child or vulnerable adult’. To this response, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver responded ‘Well, that’s what we will consider’. Facial expressions and head movements were occurring during this comment.
  • The appellant put forward a case that their human rights have been breached and the procedure to bar was breached which is correct. Michael Flynn waved his hand at this remark. The appellant further mentioned the golliwog and HHJ Simon Oliver says ‘I already mentioned it yesterday, its not racist, it was made in to a big thing at one time’. This comment was made in a much lower voice away from his microphone.
  • Eventually 10 minutes in to the summing up, Michael Flynn and Simon Oliver once again were putting their hands over the microphones and whispering to one another. This occurred 3 times. Eventually HHJ Simon Oliver put his hand up in gesture of STOP! And thats enough of the appellants summing up when they had another 20 minutes of material to put forward which put forward errors of law and facts.
  • The last issue we remembered when the appellant was asking HHJ Simon Oliver how long will it be before they receive the judgement. He said with a smirk on his face that he will be going on holiday for 3 weeks and so the appellant will not receive the judgement under the end of July 2014. He also stated that he will be on a beach somewhere on a last minute holiday. To this remark, Michael Flynn, Janice Funnell, BJ and others in the back of the courtroom could be heard smirking and laughing. We believe this was HHJ Simon Oliver indirectly implying the contents of the box he retrieved on the first/second of the hearing contained monetary/holiday value and that he will be spending it on a luxury holiday on a beach.
  • The final moment was when the judiciary were leaving, Michael Flynn and HHJ Simon Oliver with grins of their faces stood up and continued waving their hand at the appellant as though they are not interested for nearly 20 seconds before retiring.

Throughout the hearing, it was only Janice Funnell who acted professionally and listened to both sides but we believe she was looking towards HHJ Simon Oliver to understand what he was doing throughout. We think Janice Funnell has an approach that ’Its a mans world’ rather then act on anything she will observe is wrong. Although our complaint does not relate to her as we had confidence she behaved herself professionally throughout the majority of the hearing.

After observing the judgement, it was clear it was filled with lies, falsehood and deceit and clearly the appellant wasn’t heard. In fact, it would be sensible to say the appellant should not have turned up at the hearing. No safeguarding concerns were identified and no evidence supported the false allegations made against the appellant by the judiciary. The conduct of the judiciary shows they are/were severely biased as even a mere act of impropriety should not exist when handling cases when clearly with the substantial incidents addressed above shows this matter has gone beyond a mere act or a single incident. 

In 2015, the appellant asked the tribunal to reconsider the case under ‘errors of law’. The appellant received a somewhat concerning letter and response from HHJ Simon Oliver basically stating he will in future consider issuing a civil restraint order that the appellant does not agree with his judgement when the appeal was on errors of law. Once again, HHJ Simon Oliver did not respond to the grounds of appeal under errors of law but rather ignored it just like he ignored it at the hearing and at the review of the decision. HHJ Simon Oliver was using his professional powers for personal gain by trying to push the appellant around once again. 

We were also somewhat surprised that HHJ Simon Oliver and other members of the courtroom and judiciary were making a mockery of the court system and communicating with hand gestures the majority of the time and placing hands on microphones throughout the hearing too.

Furthermore, the judiciary, mainly HHJ Simon Oliver and Michael Flynn should be suspended from their duties pending disciplinary action against them and also criminal charges placed upon them for:

  • Perverting the course of justice

  • Bribery under The Bribery Act 2010

  • Misconduct in a public office

  • Money laundering

  • Fraud

  • Misuse of public funds

  • Accessory to corrupting public morals

  • Dishonesty

  • Fraud by abuse of position

Additional charges related to other cases:

  • Sexual harassment

  • Soliciting for sex

  • Sexual assault

Consideration needs to also be given towards whether Kevin Brooks whom is the Government legal departments solicitor should also be prosecuted under the bribery act and for perverting the course of justice for giving and relaying a ‘gift’ to HHJ Simon Oliver from the CEO of the DBS Adele Downey and The Trust.

Complaint made to the Upper Tribunal President – Justice William Charles.

A complaint was made to Justice William Charles of the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber about the issues raised. Initially Justice William Charles ignored all correspondence but after persistence from the appellant for over a year, he responded. He accepted the complaint and investigated it. After 6 weeks of investigating, the conclusion of Justice William Charles was:

  • The appellant was lying but does not support it with evidence. He claims the allegation in ‘incredible’
  • He refuses to investigate the matter of the gift box exchanging hands claiming the allegations are ‘Incredible’ and does not require further investigation.
  • He also claims in his letter that the recordings ‘cannot be retrieved’ on the ‘Dart Server’ and he has not got access to it. No reasons or investigation has been carried out or provided to decide where the recordings have gone. We believe it has been deliberately deleted to cover up the bribe in question and the behaviour complained of.
  • The president of the Upper Tribunal claims the appellants ‘makes matters up’. No evidence is provided to support the claim.

In 2016, the matter progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO) on the procedure of the initial complaint. The outcome was that Justice William Charles has every right not to investigate the complaint as that is his right. A separate police investigation is also underway by the Metropolitan police.

Judicial complaints process:

Judicial Conduct investigations Office (JCIO):

In 2016 and 2017, a complaint was made using the judicial complaints system. As Justice William Charles covered the matter up, the matter was progressed to the Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office who stated that the Tribunal presidents decision or cover up should be progressed to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO). 

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman (JACO):

The response from JACO was that Justice William Charles is entitled not to investigate the allegations of Judge Simon Oliver taking bribes. As this cover up now goes to senior levels, we the public must now fight.

Police Investigation:

As of June 2016, HHJ Simon Oliver, Michael Flynn, Justice William Charles and the Government legal departments Solicitor Kevin Brooks are being investigated by London police.

This web page has been created to warn the members of the public and the taxpayer that if you have HHJ Simon Oliver as a Judge, beware, HE TAKES BRIBES. What is even more concerning is his main speciality is the family division of Reading County Court and Safeguarding and he has the potential to damage and destroy other peoples families and lives because he wants bribes and gifts all the time. There is a reason why he places his hands on microphones all the time during the court hearings, it’s because he knows he is doing something wrong that he does not want recorded. The reason he does it is because his superiors are also doing it and encouraging him to do it as well. 

Personal life and the use of male prostitutes

Judge Simon claims he practices religion in his private life and seems to know a little about the religions practices although this is also a fraud considering he takes bribes in his professional life. He is lying to God and to everyone else around him about his faith as he does not practice what he preaches.

In 2016, his wife Elizabeth kicked him out of their family home because it came to light he was using male prostitutes and he was also involved in a gay relationship with another man. Although there is nothing wrong in being gay, it gives credence to the fact that Judge Simon Oliver is so dishonest in his personal life that he would lead his wife on for lengthy periods of time under falsehood and deceit. He lied to his wife, he cheated on her and he hid his sexuality from her too. We can only wonder what she went through. She should be commended for kicking him out of the family home. She should now expose him for the bribes he took throughout his judicial and legal career. Judge Simon Oliver also has two sons. One is Ben Oliver who works for FSP Law in Reading and the other is Edward Oliver who also works as a lawyer as well. Ben Oliver and Simon Oliver have both previously worked together on the same case where Ben is the lawyer representing his client and Simon as the judge. This is without disclosing the relationship to anyone else in the court room. This is another instance of fraud which has resulted innocent people going to prison. It is unknown how many cases have been heard under this guise.

Using rent boys and young adults to satisfy his sexual desires: Judge Simon Oliver is seen out on a date with a young barrister in return for fast track promotions and ‘big case’ wins. Meanwhile his delusional wife sits at home ignoring it.

Allegations of Nipple Tweaking

Judge Simon Oliver has been reported several times of ‘Nipple tweaking’ in the court room. Several unrepresented litigants have observed this and complained about it but to no avail. Judge Oliver is known to use the technique of Nipple tweaking to divert attention from the litigation and refocus elsewhere in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. He continues to use this system until the present day because his employer, the Ministry of Justice encourages him to do this.

HHJ Simon Olivers Home

HHJ Simon Oliver lives a lavish lifestyle in a 5 bedroom house located in the suburbs of Wokingham, Berkshire which is valued at £700,000, far more excessive then his annual salary of £127,000. This is from the proceeds of his criminal activities. His son Benjamin states he has never seen any of his fathers money but he strangely forgets the big house that is fully paid for from bribe money and extortion.

The address is:

Glenwood, 20 Lowther Road, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG41 1JD.

The house that was built by perverting the course of justice – Judge Simon Olivers residence which has been built by criminal proceeds of bribes and money laundering which he has been involved in for several decades. Thames Valley Police have installed a special alarm in his house so they can look after their special friend.

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fraud investigations initiate if Judge Simon Oliver is challenged by litigants

Many people have reported that when they have challenged judge Simon Oliver on his decision-making skills, conduct, behaviour, or even take their case to social media, are subjected to department of work and pensions (DWP) fraud investigations. This is usually based on false allegations made by judge Simon Oliver in an attempt to sabotage the litigants financial means. Simon Oliver has direct connections in the department of work and pensions and can initiate fraud investigations within four weeks. Unfortunately, fabricated fraud Investigations by another government department is not the duty of the DWP and should certainly not be financed by the taxpayer. The vast majority of litigants who challenged Simon Oliver are cleared of any wrongdoing. In fact, the only person that really does any fraud is actually Simon Oliver himself by using his ‘gifts’ and money laundering tactics using the court process. Several other litigants involved in family cases have had their housing benefit revoked and are evicted from their homes just so that Simon Oliver does not have to rule it in their favour. The excuse that he uses is that they do not have appropriate accommodation to accommodate a child when it was Simon Oliver who organised it in the first place. It’s obvious by reading the comments on this site that the only one that is involved in fraud and money laundering is actually Simon Oliver. He is also protected by government legal department, the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police. The Berkshire Freemasons are not that far off either. They have protected him for decades knowing full well of his criminal activities. None of these departments and bodies have ever bothered even investigating him.

Thames Valley Police

Thames Valley Police (TVP) have also been implicated in criminal activities involving judge Simon Oliver. In fact, they have a very good relationship with each other and he regularly attends functions and Christmas parties at Reading police station. TVP are fully aware of Simon Oliver’s activities involving child abductions, bribe taking, freemasonry and other criminal activities. Several people have reported that Simon Oliver uses Thames Valley Police to attend other people’s properties to assault them and steal their possessions. They also enforce fraudulent court orders which have been faked using an unknown judge to steal positions or obtain material that Simon Oliver can use for blackmail purposes. Children have also been abducted in a similar manner. Simon Oliver has direct connections with senior members of TVP who are also allegedly Freemasons. When complaints are made to TVP about this inappropriate relationship between them and Simon Oliver, they refuse to acknowledge or respond to such requests. Other police forces use similar tactics to avoid discussing the matter either. Because of this very good relationship that Simon Oliver has with the police, he is never subjected to any criminal investigation but he is certainly protected by them because they have installed an alarm in his home with direct response by all police in the TVP catchment area. This was upgraded by the Ministry of Justice. The purpose of this alarm is so that judge Simon Oliver can continue doing his criminal activities and being protected at the same time (by using tax payer money to do so)

Berkshire Freemasons

Judge Simon Oliver is a senior member in the cult organisation called The Berkshire Freemasons. He uses this Freemasonry connection to pervert the course of justice and carry out more criminal activity. Many judges, lawyers, police inspectors and other senior figures in government use this Freemasonry connection to prevent the wider public receiving justice. Something which the tax payer already pays for. Judge Simon Oliver uses his Freemasonry connection, not only in Berkshire but also in Didcot and London. He claims its only ‘for fun’ but there is nothing fun about the horrific ordeals others in the public have to go through because of him. Since his wife kicked him out, he uses Sindlesham courts address for correspondence. But please note, he does not live here, this is where he gets his mail. It is part of the masonic lodge which he is a member of. This masonic lodge is the headquarters of the Berkshire Freemasons which is a secret cult society.

The address of the Berkshire Freemasons is:

Sindlesham Court, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire, England, RG41 5EA.

The Fraud and Money Laundering Empire explained: This premises is paid for by the taxpayers and the bribes and gifts he has received during the course of his career by lying, misrepresenting, colluding, cheating, stealing and fraud against innocent members of the public. It seems like lying, cheating and taking bribes has paid off for Simon Oliver.
The Worshipful Brother Judge Simon Oliver: In his Freemasonry attire glorifying his association with the cult organisation. He uses this association to commit more crimes in court but being protected by fellow Freemasons who encourage him to do this. He is protected by his senior Freemasons in his lodge because they also need his assistance to launder money. The crimes he commits is taking bribes, legal child abductions and committing fraud on a mass scale.

2017 and 2018

In 2017, his wife allowed him to come back home.

Benjamin Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Benjamin Oliver is the son of judge Simon Oliver. He currently works as a partner in Field, Seymour, Parkes (FSP) law based in Reading. He specialises in creating wills, inheritance, control of trusts and lasting power of attorneys. Ben Oliver uses his position to launder his father’s criminal money using his speciality in probate law. Ben has also come before his father in court where Simon Oliver was the judge and his son Ben was the lawyer representing one of the parties. This was without disclosing to anyone their relationship so they could maximise the amount of money that they can make. Many people who challenge Simon Oliver’s behavior and his fabricated judgements usually are attacked by FSP law. Ben Oliver targets the litigant in order to destroy them. He liaises with Thames Valley Police to do this as well. Ben has also advised his clients that they have to give 5-figure sums to his firm so that they can pass it on to Simon Oliver and guarantee a favourable judgement. None of these allegations have been defended by Simon Oliver or Ben Oliver. Ben Oliver has also worked as a crown prosecutor to prosecute parents in family law cases in Westminster magistrates court. This was most likely because his father Simon asked him to do it.

Ben Oliver attended Warwickshire university and gained a first class honours degree in economics. He graduated in 2009. He then attended the Guildford college of law to complete further qualifications in law and eventually gaining an LLM in 2011. He has since worked at FSP law from 2011 until the present day eventually becoming a partner. The reason Ben Oliver did a degree in economics first was because his grades were not good enough to do a law degree as a direct entry from college. He eventually overcame this after he received his economics degree. Since then he has been committing heinous acts of criminal activity as a solicitor whilst being covered up by his father Simon Oliver and and their association with Thames Valley Police which prevents them from being prosecuted.

Ben Oliver – Simon Oliver’s son Ben Oliver also known as FSP laws one and only ‘deputy child abductor’. Ben works alongside his father Simon also committing vile acts of crimes where he uses his economics degree to advise clients how to bribe judges and launder money.

Ben Oliver is married to a woman called Kathleen Norton and they both have two children. They live in Basingstoke in a million pound mansion. This has been bought by all the criminal money the father and son team have made from bribes and other criminal activities at the expense of the taxpayer and the public.

Ben Oliver and his wife Kathleen Norton – Simon and Ben Oliver protect their own children (and grandchildren) whilst targeting and abusing other peoples children (and laundering money at the same time). Ben Oliver is a disgrace just like his father. These two products of the Oliver household are now reproducing to continue the crimes they inflict on society upon generation after generation.

Edward Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)

Edward Oliver is Simon Oliver’s second son. He also works in the legal industry. He’s not a current practising solicitor or barrister and tries to keep away from his father’s bad reputation. He is also married but has no children.

Edward Oliver and his wife standing in Simon Olivers back garden – Edward is the second son of Simon Oliver but he is too embarrassed of his fathers behaviour that he chooses to keep a low profile. We are sure he’s also laundering money and bringing harm to society one way or another, it just happens, he’s a closed case.

The Worshipful Company of the Horners

Judge Simon Oliver is also affiliated with the livery organisation called The Worshipful Company of the Horners. This organisation also has judges, lawyers and police officers, all working in a cult committing more fraud and crimes against the public. Mr Oliver was inducted into this organisation in 2018. He currently is still an active member and continues to bring shame upon them.  

Bringing shame and embarrassment on the Horners: Judge Simon Oliver being inducted in to a livery group in an attempt to launder money and collude with other professionals in industry.

The address of the Horners is:

The Hall, The Painters Hall, 9 Little Trinity Lane, London, EC4V 2AD.

Allegations of manipulating appeals in higher courts

Judge Simon Oliver has been caught manipulating and attempting to manipulate appeals in the higher courts to pervert justice. Lies that Simon Oliver wrote in his original judgement are then made worse if it is appealed. A search of Reading court uncovered evidence of this heinous crime to which Mr Oliver to this date has not responded to.

Attempting to pervert the course of justice: Judge Simon Oliver giving specific instructions to the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeals made against his order by a vulnerable adult. This denies justice to litigants and promotes and encourages criminal activity using the court process.

Practicing under false qualifications

Judge Simon Oliver has on numerous occasions been practicing under false qualifications. It has been gathered from reliable sources that Mr Oliver, prior to 2012 did not hold a Court of Protection license but was still hearing those cases which resulted in individuals being illegally asset seized. In other judgements, Mr Oliver claimed he was the ‘President of the Queens Bench Division’ of the High Court, a designated title he does not have authority to use, let alone have. 

A liar and a cheater exposed practicing under false qualifications: Judge Simon Oliver IS NOT THE PRESIDENT OF THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION and neither he ever was. He is once against caught lying but not to his own detriment but that of his victims.

Jordan Publishing

In late 2017 and early 2018, HHJ Simon Oliver was working with Jordan Publishing to write his own book on special needs and the law. He published his book in November 2017 in Foyles bookstore in London. An image is shown below of this. The book is filled with lies and completely against reality. He had a deal with Jordan Publishing as one of his ‘Gifts’ from a solicitor who HHJ Simon Oliver works with in Reading. It is somewhat very concerning he is writing books now talking about special needs when in fact he is responsible for creating most of the special needs in children by behaving the way he does (taking bribes). Furthermore, he treats vulnerable people and people with special needs like rubbish and he mentions no where in his book about the bribes he takes and the requests for bribes (In the form of ‘gifts’ and ‘loans’).

Publishing lies in a book with the assistance of Jordan Publishing: HHJ Simon Oliver giving a speech at Foyles book store in London talking about his new book on special needs. A deal he most probably received through collusion and bribery in the first place. Unfortunately his book does not appear to be that popular as only 3 people turned up. 

Chairing conferences on special education needs

In June 2019, Mr Oliver was chairing a conference on special education needs in London claiming to be an expert in the field (when we know he isn’t). He sat there pretending to be interested when in fact in reality he treats people with special needs like dirt. The comments on this website and several other websites is evidence of it. This whole program was fabricated for the purposes of having confidence in him. Obviously no one at the conference was aware of Mr Olivers past or even if they were, they chose to ignore it.  Strangely so, he chose not to tweak his nipples at this event! Its probably because there were too many people there watching and it would not be appropriate to have so many witnesses to his crimes.

The DEPRIVER of liberty safeguards – Judge Simon Oliver chairing a conference on special education needs and trying to look professional in the process. In reality, Mr Oliver practices under false qualifications. Obviously no one had the audacity to stand up and ask him questions about his disgusting past which includes taking bribes, rapes and murders.

High Court proceedings in 2019 and 2020

Judge Simon Oliver initiated legal proceeding in the High Court in London against a former medical practitioner accusing them of being the publisher of this site. These were lies. He accused and gave sanctions against someone that was ‘suited’ for his lies. The individual concerned has commented on this site to clear their own name and accused Judge Simon Oliver of inventing the allegation and colluding with the High Court to get it falsely substantiated and then using the media to create fake articles stating that he was subjected to an attempted ‘Anthrax attack’. No evidence is supplied of these lies. These proceedings were financed by the Ministry of Justice and their Director Sir Richard Heaton (someone whose already being accused several times on the internet of being a paedophile). Mr Oliver did not state the allegations made on this site are false but just that he felt ‘Harassed’. We will let you use your own imagination to decide how pitiful of a response that is.

Government Legal Department attack Judges Behaving Badly to protect Freemason Simon Oliver

In 2020, web hosters in America were contacted by the Government Legal Department requesting this blog be taken offline. This attempt was based of fictional claims and did not work. America refused the request because America is a more reliable and superior country. The allegations relied upon were once again complete and utter lies and the level of dishonesty is unbelievable. The Government Legal Department stated that America is going to be held in contempt in a UK court. Obviously, America was not afraid and told the Government Legal Department where to go. So Freemason Judge Simon Oliver is once again back to the drawing board thinking of what to do next. The Government Legal Departments letter is published below.

Bullying and harassing web hosters in America: Judge Simon Oliver has been laughingly styled as ‘His Honour’ attempting to get this site down using fake court orders and tax payers money to attempt to cover up his crimes. It is a pitiful attempt which failed. 

False allegations of anthrax attacks

In December 2019, Judge Simon Oliver falsely accused a medical practitioner of plotting an anthrax attack against him and then distributed these allegations in the media. These allegations were completely and utterly fabricated and the only reason they were made was to racially harass an individual purely because they were Muslim and from a certain cultural background and libelling them in the process. No evidence has ever been produced supporting these allegations. The articles that have been published is a clear indication that Simon Oliver has no boundaries when he wants to instigate a hate crime against civilians and is prepared to use negative stereotypes against a specific religion to bolster his position as a victim. The claims that Mr Oliver was subjected to an attempt of an anthrax attack was never reported to the police and has never been reported to any anti-terrorist organisation. Mr Oliver and his legal team have only published this in the media to the detriment of all Muslims and continues to refuse to log this as a police report. The individual that Mr Oliver had been targeting has previously being falsely accused by Mr Oliver of being a paedophile and once again distributed in the media.

A ‘Victim’ of an ‘attempted’ anthrax attack: Judge Simon Oliver took to the media to label himself as a victim of a terrorist act. The allegation was invented by the Ministry of Justice to ruin a medical doctors reputation so they could protect Mr Oliver, his lodge and his rings.

Allegations of racism

Mr Oliver has previously himself been accused of making racial comments in the courtroom. These comments range from referring to African Caribbeans as ‘horse nostril’ and referring to Asians as ‘you should only be working in a corner shop’. He has been shown to have a strong history of making negative judgements against people of ethnicity, predominately of the black and minority backgrounds.

Pre-written judgements

Judge Simon Oliver and his network are regularly known to writing pre-written judgements. These are judgements and orders that have been written in advance of a hearing or any evidence being presented. This is perverting the course of justice as well as misconduct in a public office. Recent examples include a judgement given in the High court in December 2019 was pre-written by Simon Oliver for his own benefit. The evidence relied upon for this assertion is because Mr Olivers legal team published the judgement 12 days prior (29th November 2019) to the High court handing down this judgement on their own website with Matrix chambers. The metadata of this document has also been removed. The official hand down by the High court was the 10th of December 2019. No defence to this allegation has been made by Matrix chambers or Simon Oliver. The corruption is overwhelming and when Judge Simon Oliver is accused of corruption and bribery, he then commits more corruption and bribery to defend himself which involves casually forging documents and writing judgements beforehand to harm the original victims.

Evidence of a pre-written judgement: Judge Simon Oliver and Matrix chambers uploaded a copy of the approved judgement 12 days before it was handed down by the High Court on to the Matrix chambers website. The conclusion is that this was a kangaroo court. Something Mr Oliver has already been accused of thousands of times.

Black Lives Matter: African-Carribbean organised child abductions

In December 2019 and January 2020, several media publications in Ghana and Nigeria appeared accusing Judge Simon Oliver of rituals and organised child abductions from individuals mainly from the African community. Several parents who had their children taken away by Mr Oliver were banned from contacting their children whilst his connections ‘Lose’ children in the system. If the parents do try to contact their children, Judge Oliver imprisons them and then after their sentence deports them back to their African countries whilst their children are still in care. Its a technique Mr Oliver uses to prevent contact between children and parents whilst paedophile rings take over. Examples of this include the Musa and the Adajo family who have since been deported.

Black lives do matter: Judge Simon Oliver making headlines in West Africa where accusations of racially motivated negative judgements are being made against the African community. This is similar to allegations of terrorist activities falsely made by Mr Oliver against Muslims.

Several allegations have also been made again Mr Oliver. These consist of:

  • Making false claims in the media of being the victim of an anthrax attack by a Muslim NHS worker

  • Referring to African Carribbean litigants as ‘Horse nostril’

  • Regularly using racist language and stereotypes against black and ethnic minorities

  • Using rent boys for sexual gratification

  • Working with false qualifications as a Court of Protection judge when he does not hold a nominated license

  • Withholding medical certificates in cases involving extremely vulnerable adults

  • Refusing to comply with human rights legislation. More specifically but not limited to article 6, 8 and 10

  • Going into the back with social workers and other litigants with evidence and coming back out laughing and joking

  • Using limited companies to claim state funds to look after children he has put into care

  • Working with social services to carry out kangaroo courts where members of the public are at a disadvantage and having their children ‘stolen’

  • Working with the government department the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) to dismiss appeals and accuse innocent health professionals and teachers of being paedophiles whilst boxes are passed to him in court called ‘gifts’

  • Laundering tax payers moneys into offshore bank accounts under different names

  • Requesting from an appellant he requires a Porsche 911 car in return for a favourable judgement

  • Requesting from appellants he requires between £6000-£20,000+ in return for favourable judgements

  • Fabricating judicial judgements and orders in return for obtaining state funds for foster care 

  • Working with CID from Thames Valley Police to execute fabricated search and arrest warrants in return for stealing drugs and money from homes of known criminals and then using the seized items to sell to rival criminals for a fee

  • Being invited to Social services and Thames Valley Police Christmas parties and regularly playing golf with them

  • Refusing to comply with release orders from higher courts and under Human rights legislation’s

  • Using the judicial complaints system for racketeering purposes

  • Mr Oliver has also been allegedly involved in gang rapes of teenagers in care

  • Allegations of murder with the assistance and support of rogue officers from Thames Valley Police 

  • Requesting his court clerk Freddy Cutts to contact appellants and opponents legal teams (solicitors and barristers offices) in current court cases to ask for ‘loans’ and ‘gifts’ (bribes)

  • Mr Oliver has also been involved in contacting legal firms and requesting they desist from representing their clients in return for future favoured judgements and ‘big case wins’ to prevent his money laundering and fraud operations from being detected

If you have concerns about this judge or any other judge, please comment on the section provided below. Judges taking bribes are very common in the judicial system in the UK. Its called ‘The Gift System’. Its only when they get caught is when you see how the complaints process works which is a fraud itself. Judges even took bribes in the form of gift boxes in the Stephen Lawrence case but no one was held to account.

If you have any issues or problems in regards to the conduct of this judge, we advise you contact the police, obtain a crime report or crime reference number and leave it in the comments below so police complaints against this man can be recorded internationally. It is unlikely the police will record your complaint as the police refuse to act on criminals like this because its not good for their own business so if that is the case, just add your allegations in the comments below instead.

Lets take one small step for the taxpayer and the hard-working member of the public and one giant leap to exposing HHJ Simon Oliver as a corrupt judge who is guilty of dishonesty. bribery and criminal activity.

If you have any concerns and would like to send information or documents confidentially, please contact us on

jbb-blog@protonmail.com.

We do not answer all E-Mails but we do read everything.

Thank you for reading

2,506 comments

  2. LOOK AT THIS RUBBISH!

    They must think the public just fell off a turnip truck.

    This is all theatre. Firstly, he is retired and his pension is safe no matter what. He has nothing to lose. Secondly, what law did he break back then? Is there a law called “Acting Inappropriately”? The answer is no.

    Men have been abusing women in the workplace for decades and, especially in the police, all the other guys would join in too. This is just play acting for the benefit of the public who are wise to the fact that there is corruption at a senior level in Thames Valley Police and nothing is being done about it. If no law existed back then, even if he is accused of breaking it – then what can be done. NOTHING.

    They watch this website and should, quite rightly, be getting a bit hot under the collar. So this is all for the public’s benefit. The so-called offender is not obligated to even turn up.

    ACTING INAPPROPRIATELY is Thames Valley Police not investigating crime, and perverting the course of justice. It is a serious offence that the hierarchy should be facing. Instead they are using this guy as some kind of scapegoat. Are they also thick?

    News

    14th May
    Thames Valley Police Officer misconduct hearing

    Thames Valley Police HQ in Kidlington

    A RETIRED police officer is accused of ‘acting inappropriately’ for more than a decade towards four younger female colleagues.

    PC Alan Nisbet, who retired in November, will now face the heads of the force at a misconduct hearing OVER THE PHONE.

    This week he will give his version of events against the claims that he treated four women with a ‘lack of respect and courtesy’ for more than 10 years between 2008 and 2019.

    Read more: the 13 Oxfordshire police officers facing misconduct hearings

    If found guilty, the former Thames Valley Police officer, who was last based in Milton Keynes, will have breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour expected of him in relation to the clauses Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Discreditable Conduct.

    As a result his name could be put on the police black list and he will never be able to work for any police force again – including as a volunteer.

    Due to coronavirus the hearing will take place over the phone in private. (LOL)

    4 comments

    Der Biffer 22 hrs ago
    7 So no actual punishment then if the decision goes against him. Why waste time, and therefore money, when nothing will happen to prevent or deter this sort of behaviour? Oh, it’s our money. I forgot! Silly me.

    art carter 18 hrs ago

    0 think the word RETIRED tells us that it wont affect him in the slightest.

    40UP 18 hrs ago
    0 What a waste of time and money.

    Fly1986 18 hrs ago
    2 Retired is the key. Though the fact they’ve mentioned volunteer suggests to me he may have been working on a front desk somewhere to while away his days counting paperclips.
    That said he’ll be on a full police pension that they cannot touch. Excuse the pun!
    £100k in the bank and £1500 a month until the day he dies.
    He’ll take his money and go sit in his garden with two fingers up to the head of PSD. 🙂
    Much like I do.

    Last Updated: 4 hrs ago

    https://www.heraldseries.co.uk/news/18451444.thames-valley-police-officer-misconduct-hearing/

  3. The top dogs at the Ministry of Justice should be investigated, along with successive Lord Chief Justices. If they cannot keep criminals from operating within the justice system, then either they are part of the cartel or they are not fit for their jobs.

    Are they all hiding under stones?

    Did someone say something about Ian from Essex?

  4. Photo of John Hemming John Hemming Liberal Democrat, Birmingham, Yardley

    I accept the hon. Gentleman’s point, but I could cite a specific case. I have not got the reference on me, but I could give it to him by e-mail later if he is interested. The case involves a published judgment where the court had a court order saying that the doctor is not allowed to provide evidence to the GMC. There is a High Court order to say that that evidence must not be provided. That cannot be right. If that order got to the Supreme Court it would be struck down, but there is a problem with the appellate process and a real challenge with all these things.

    Clause 7(2), perhaps the most important part of the Bill, is to prevent cover-ups. Most substantial cover-ups involve people being threatened or pressed to prevent them from complaining to regulators. That clearly happened with Hillsborough and the Savile paedophile network, where children were punished for complaining. Although details of what sort of offence should be involved needs to be left for consideration in Committee, this absolutely key change is needed. The USA already has in its criminal code elements that protect complainants from the prosecution apparatus.

    On “Matters relating to court proceedings”, clause 8(1) deals with the problem that Mr Hain faced. The judiciary do at times make use of defamation law, which is entirely right, but people should not face criminal proceedings for making truthful statements about the operation of the legal system.

    Clause 8(2) deals with the imprisonment of people in secret for contempt—quite a few people are in prison for contempt. The Official Solicitor is supposed to protect their interests, but nothing much seems to happen. I wrote to him and asked him, “What do you do about people who are in prison for contempt?” and he did not tell me anything—he just said, “I suppose we’re supposed to do something.”

    Deborah Paul, a London mother, was imprisoned earlier this year. Those who are aware of her case believe that it was an oppressive act. There is no formal report. Although in theory the step of imprisonment is supposed to happen in open court, in practice, a court flashes into public session in the blink of an eye and goes back in camera—it might as well not bother. Clause 8(2) would protect contemnors from oppressive imprisonment and the abuse of power by the court.

    Clause 8(3) would assist in dealing with cover-ups. For people to challenge public authorities, they need particularly deep pockets. The problem is the uncertainty as to what costs they face paying if they lose the application. The court has developed through the common law protection in limited circumstances. A more general application of a pre-emptive costs order would allow people to challenge bodies such as the GMC or local authorities about wrongly given planning permission without having to bet the farm. I would wish for an element of one-way cost-shifting for judicial review, but in the interests of compromise and so that progress is made, I have suggested a smaller shift towards the power of the individual against the state.

    Clause 9 is on the activities of the Official Solicitor. As it stands, the Official Solicitor is accountable merely to secret court proceedings. I know of a number of cases in which people have wrongly had their mental capacity removed—they are then submitted to the decisions of the Official Solicitor. RP v. UK—I made an application to the European Court of Human Rights to assist RP and her brother—demonstrates how cataclysmic a wrongful removal of mental capacity can be. RP’s GP and a second expert have indicated that she had mental capacity and was not too stupid to instruct a solicitor, but the system—all the way through—wrongly treated her as somebody who does not have mental capacity.

    In order to appeal, a party needs a transcript of the judgment. However, that is often far too difficult to obtain—I am having problems with a constituency case in that respect. The official recording is frequently lost. The simple solution to the problem would be to allow people to take their own recordings, so that they can produce their own transcript.

    On clause 11—“Right to assert litigation capacity”—when somebody has been deemed too stupid to instruct a solicitor and has normally had the Official Solicitor appointed as a litigation friend, it is almost impossible to get a solicitor to act to challenge such an appointment. The clause would make it clear that someone can challenge the appointment of a litigation friend. The proposal in RP v. UK that the Official Solicitor should be asked to review the appointment did not work in the case of Lee Gilliland, a gentleman in Bristol who had his mental capacity removed because he did not trust public authorities. He found himself evicted without notice, because the Official Solicitor did not tell him he was about to be evicted.

    I would happily accept in Committee that clause 12 —“Ambit of reasonableness and capacity”—is too advanced and progressive for the English system, but it is worth considering. It would make the lives of those who have limited capacity much better. It is based on a clause from a province of Canada that tries to limit the controls exercised on people who are deemed not to have capacity. I am particularly concerned about the imprisonment of people using mental capacity. The deprivation of liberty safeguards are clearly inadequate in that they are overwhelmingly subject to conflicts of interest. I remain concerned about a constituent who was, in my view, wrongly imprisoned using that mechanism in order to prevent the investigation of a crime. However, the issue needs detailed consideration in Committee.

    Link to this speech In context Individually
    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HC Deb, 26 October 2012, c1208)

    https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-10-26a.1189.2&s=hemming+secret+prisoners#g1208.1

  5. Nadine Dorries Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire

    Given that there are court transcribers, one would assume that anybody attending the court would have a right to the transcription when a judgment has been passed in their case. Not only is it not possible always to get a transcription, but when it is possible, it takes a considerable length of time. In that considerable length of time, the appeal is in abeyance and kept waiting—it cannot be lodged.

    Link to this speech In context Individually
    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HC Deb, 26 October 2012, c1210)

    https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-10-26a.1189.2&s=hemming+secret+prisoners#g1208.1

  6. 09/09/2018

    VIDEO:

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1

    The Great Insolvency Scam: Part 1
    Consciousness in Action, ITNJ, Politics, Sovereignty / Law, Uncategorized, Videos

    The Crown versus The People: The Story of Gedaljahu Ebert and the collusion of banks, insolvency practitioners and the courts to defraud him of an estate worth £1.2 Billion. Ebert walks us through the scam and explains how courts, banks and the ‘system’ conspire to asset-strip and fraudulently force bankruptcy on millions of people. Once we learn these hidden truths we will then have the ammunition to take back our power, reclaim our assets and force a re-set of the entire parasitic system once and for all. The time has come…..Arise Homo sapiens!

  7. VIDEO

    Michelle Young fraudulent bankruptcy and abuse of legal process

  9. Member of Parliament, Paul Flynn:

    Operation Tiberius, corruption, serious organised crime, police, Freemasons, etc.

  10. CRIMINALS WORKING FROM INSIDE HMRC STOLE PATRICK CULLINANE’S ASSETS

    You are now aware, from MP, Paul Flynn’s speak in the House of Commons about Operation Tiberius, that the report revealed that serious organised crime has infiltrated almost (perhaps all) government department. So this is no joke. It is a fact that HMRC chased him, using official channels, such as police and high court sheriffs, for 250K, when he was owed a rebate because he paid income tax out of every paycheck and certainly did not owe a penny.

    So, just like Len Lawrence, Patrick Cullinane was another one who was literally thrown into the streets with only the clothes on his back, with no means to pay for shelter or food.

    No government official or politician would help him. No solicitor would help him. We do know that the legally-trained criminals keep blacklists so that victims will not be represented in court. There must be many thousands of cases where this takes place because we know of a number of cases where this happens.

    They are not one-offs. It is organised criminality.

    He lost everything, including his fiancee, the support of his family who thought he had done something wrong, his entire future in which he planned to start a family, and his health.

  11. A top-flight journalist flew from the USA to come and help Patrick Cullinane, and found absolute proof of the fraud and criminal abuse inflicted upon Patrick by HRMC, but still nobody in the government or the so-called legal system would help him. The journalist, Christopher Fogarty, published an article about the case in the Irish-American News as, true to form, British mainstream media work for the government and not the people. So they did nothing for him.

    http://www.fmotl.com/IrishAmericanNews-September2009…_files/image002.jpg

    September 2009

    Irish-American News
    by Christopher Fogarty

    A FREE BRITAIN? Progress accelerates. Last December, this column reported that Limerickman, London-resident Patrick Cullinane, is finally getting justice.

    Inland Revenue (Britain’s IRS) had fabricated a tax claim against him for a few thousand pounds, for which they liened his £170,000 home, got bailiffs, and seventeen police officers to evict him from it, sold it, and kept the entire proceeds.

    The gov’t then abetted the IR’s crimes Soviet-style by getting a psychiatrist to declare Cullinane’s complaints evidence of “paranoid disorder.”

    He is lucky to have survived the coordinated official criminals.

    He credits honest Englishman/Reporter Phillip Inman and his Guardian newspaper, the IAN, and now his M.P., Gareth Thomas.

    Cullinane’s case’s recent status review, held in his MP’s office, showed progress. It is gratifying that MP Thomas regrets having once wished Cullinane would permanently disappear. For Cullinane, we expect prompt compensation for all of the losses inflicted by IR crimes (and abetted by High Court Judges), though he can never be compensated for the two decades of misery.

    Cullinane’s local newspapers trumpet “SERVING THE BOROUGH OF HARROW” while actually covering up Irish cases like Cullinane’s, reducing its Irish community.

    BRITAIN’S PROBLEM is systematic injustice. Scores, if not hundreds, of English have contacted me in their doomed pursuits of justice. The injustice cannot end; not until judges, lawyers, M.P.s et al join the burgeoning movement to stop swearing oaths to uphold the Crown and, instead, begin to swear to uphold justice. Currently, the Crown and Crown-connected prevail in court against everyone else. Our 1776 rebels rescued the US from that system.

    CULLINANE sends me data on English veterinarian/aviator Maurice Kirk. Kirk had a dispute with someone better-connected. That person managed to get the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to deprive Kirk of his livelihood. Kirk was later charged with a Mickey Mouse gun violation and is now, after a 24-day hunger strike, incarcerated in a secure Mental Health Unit, with only family members allowed to visit him. His pursuit of basic rights constitutes “evidence” of his insanity.

    NORMAN SCARTH, a WW2 Murmansk-run veteran and “proud Englishman until aged 70,” authored a book on judicial corruption, and later won a landmark case in the European Court of Human Rights. It forced the UK gov’t to cease holding trials in camera, to make them public and open, a vital change hated by many British judges and lawyers.

    Eighty four-year-old Scarth writes: “I became a marked man. Two potentially-lethal terror attacks failed to silence me, so I was stitched up (framed) for a NONEXISTENT ‘crime’ & given a sentence to ensure that I’d die in prison. Well, I didn’t die, & after 4 years had ‘Paid my Debt to Society,’ due for release. Instead, I was UNLAWFULLY carted off to a Stalinist ‘Mental Hospital’, NOT as a patient, but a captive, just as much as Terry Waite, Brian Keenan, John McCarthy in Beirut, Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, Ken Bigley & Margaret Hassan in Iraq.

    The Government were mad keen that I be pumped full of drugs to destroy my brain, but the few honest nurses refused to be party to such depravity, & I escaped the fate of Andy McCardle (reportedly murdered in custody:

    See News of the World’s “State-Sponsored Murder,” After a year & a half I was given a new psychiatrist who proved less a State puppet than the others, but even he feared rocking the boat too much, & went through a pretence of ‘rehabilitation’ for 6 months before giving me a clean bill of health. I now have another case in the ECtHR against the UK – Application Number 57035/08.”

    G E O R G E F A R Q U H A R addressed Scotland’s parliament: “… In addition to my trial, which was a Kangaroo Court, and that corrupt act to veil the truth, I am currently detained in the Royal Edinburgh hospital clinic for the criminally insane. During three months as a political prisoner, I’ve been forcibly injected nine times against my will with high doses of antipsychotic drugs while being held down by numerous hospital staff. That major abuse of human rights for taking video footage of a corrupt police officer is just one of the numerous cover-ups directed against my efforts to expose Governmental child abuse. I should be in the street, non-violently campaigning, not incarcerated and drugged up like an insane criminal.”

    “PARANOIA” was another Crown psychiatrist’s evaluation of an IRA volunteer-turned-MI5 mole who feared being found and killed. The ex-mole was doomed until MI5 informed the psychiatrist that his fear was valid.

    Thus, every case of British “insanity” I know of was wrongfully diagnosed. The IRA traitor and the gov’t-persecuted Maurice Kirk, Carmel Franklin, Norman Scarth, Margaret Gomm, George Wescott, Olga Myers, Dafydd Morgan, Pauline Bridge, Peter Oakes, Jean Hooper, George Farquhar, Linda Drew, Shirley Lintern 43 RIP, Arnold McCardle—(murdered in Carstairs State Mental Hospital) and Patrick Cullinane, were all further attacked by gov’t psychiatrists.

    British officialdom sees justice-seekers as “pests,” easily labelled “stalkers.” Recent Crown legislation mandates indefinite incarceration without trial of “stalkers” of officialdom. Britain is split. Much of it advances toward a republic of sovereign citizens instead of subjects, while the Crown-privileged remnant is becoming a full-blown tyranny with ubiquitous Soviet-style “psychiatrists.” – END.

    SEE FULL ARTICLE: http://www.fmotl.com/IrishAmericanNews-September2009….htm

  12. THE GUARDIAN

    Sat 2 Jul 2005 01.19 BST

    Tax experts call for a bill of rights
    A series of reports critical of the Inland Revenue’s officials and procedures have prompted demands for clear guidance.

    Phillip Inman reports

    Tax experts this week called on the government to support a bill of rights for taxpayers following a series of critical reports which between them claimed Inland Revenue officials were overzealous in their pursuit of “unpaid” taxes and “overpaid” tax credits.

    The reports, from the parliamentary ombudsman, Citizens Advice, National Audit Office and Inland Revenue watchdog the Adjudicator, highlighted serious deficiencies in procedures and the poor handling, in many instances, of individual cases by the Revenue.

    The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIoT) said a revised taxpayers’ charter or bill of rights would force the Revenue to give taxpayers clear guidance before it could send out fines, make demands for unpaid tax or embark on investigations. It would also provide taxpayers, especially those who cannot afford an accountant, with a clear set of rules to use if launching an appeal.

    Anne Redston of the CIoT says: “At the moment the scales are tipped in favour of the taxman and a bill of rights would even up the scales and produce a fairer system.”

    Leading tax barrister and human rights advocate, Phillip Baker QC, backed the campaign. He says in other countries, like the US and Australia, they have a charter detailing the rights of taxpayers. Mr Baker says: “The activities of a Revenue officer can ruin someone’s life. Sometimes even more so than a criminal prosecution and being sent to prison. They can lose everything.”

    One person who says his life was destroyed following a Revenue investigation is Patrick Cullinane, a former film stage hand who worked at Pinewood and Shepperton and was investigated by Revenue officers in the late 80s.

    The Revenue alleged he was moonlighting between casual jobs and renting out rooms in his house to earn extra income. Mr Cullinane denied both allegations. He employed an accountant to clean up his tax affairs but the accountant was unable to convince the Revenue that neither allegation was true.

    The Revenue asked for more than £60,000 in unpaid tax. Mr Cullinane refused to pay. He fought the case up to the commissioners, which adjudicate in tax disputes, but lost.

    Attempts to overturn the order in the courts failed after the Revenue refused to release crucial documents from his file.

    Mr Cullinane’s friends, including builder Neil Woodward, who embarrassed the Revenue three years ago when he overturned his bankruptcy order, have spent the past year piecing together a dossier of rule breaches by the Revenue in Mr Cullinane’s case.

    They have been forced to trawl through Civil Procedure rules and the Taxes Management Act. They claim the breaches are a damning indictment of the Revenue’s conduct and point to a miscarriage of justice.

    Revenue ‘withheld vital information’

    Patrick Cullinane alleges the Inland Revenue failed to provide vital information at the hearing which led to his bankruptcy. Also, it failed to follow basic procedures which would have given him a clue about the allegations he faced.

    Without a taxpayers’ bill of rights, Mr Cullinane has been forced to trawl through the Civil Procedure rules which give all courts and quasi courts, like the Inland Revenue general commissioners, a code of conduct.

    Rule 48.3 requires a party “to make a reasonable search for documents” and “must include documents adversely affecting its own case”.

    The Revenue was later shown to have records detailing PAYE payments by Mr Cullinane which may have assisted his case. They also show he overpaid income tax during the period under dispute.

    Rule 51.7 says there is a requirement to give advance notice of hearsay evidence and rule 51.11 says such evidence must be tested to determine whether the informant “has any motive to conceal or misrepresent matters”.

    The Revenue told the commissioners that records from the electoral roll proved beyond doubt that Mr Cullinane rented out rooms in his three-bedroom semi. Ten years later, after internal records were leaked, the Revenue said it had based its case on information from an unnamed informant. To this day, what this informant said has not been revealed.

    Mr Cullinane has signed affidavits from neighbours and relatives to say they never saw tenants at his house. Even the person who bought his former house from the trustees in bankruptcy signed a letter to say the second and third bedrooms were uninhabitable.

    At one point in the hearing Mr Cullinane was asked to leave the room while Revenue officials remained, in breach of legal rules. There are other breaches that Mr Cullinane alleges prevented him obtaining a fair trial at the commissioners’ hearing and in later court appearances. The Revenue has consistently argued that it asked his accountant to fill in gaps in his employment record and “no satisfactory explanation was forthcoming”.

    A spokesman says: “Mr Cullinane was asked to make returns for the relevant years and/or explain what he was doing in the gaps. He did not do so to the satisfaction of the General Commissioners.”

    Mr Cullinane disputes this statement, and says it fails to answer the allegation that the commissioners didn’t have all the facts before them. Without an independent ombudsman or taxpayers’ bill of rights, Mr Cullinane will be forced to return to the courts.

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2005/jul/02/tax.jobsandmoney

  13. THE GUARDIAN

    This man was right all along

    Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports

    Phillip Inman
    @phillipinman

    Sat 10 May 2003 15.05 BST
    First published on Sat 10 May 2003 15.05 BST

    Patrick Cullinane’s life has been ruined by the Inland Revenue. The government department has bankrupted him, kicked him out of his home, and driven him to a mental breakdown. His brothers and sisters have walked away from him and he has been unable to find work.

    His crime? You might think he had committed a major white-collar tax fraud or an offshore scam depriving the Revenue of millions. But Mr Cullinane was simply an ordinary working man, earning around £18,000 a year in the 1980s largely as a casual in the film industry.

    Yet he became the victim of an Inland Revenue strategy to hunt down so-called “ghosts” in the film industry that the department believed were evading large amounts of tax. At one point the Revenue said Mr Cullinane owed £68,000 in unpaid tax.

    But what makes Mr Cullinane’s case truly extraordinary is the revelations contained in confidential Inland Revenue documents now in the possession of Jobs & Money.

    The documents show:

    · During the period that Mr Cullinane was supposed to be evading tax he was on “emergency” PAYE, paying more tax than he really owed. Yet these Revenue records were some how missed or ignored by the department’s investigators.

    · A Revenue assessment of his undeclared rental income was partly based on information from “an informant” and a list of former tenants of Mr Cullinane. The documents now reveal that the former “tenants” were really the previous owners of the property and unconnected to Mr Cullinane. Mr Cullinane has insisted throughout that he never earned rental income.

    · The Revenue’s estimate for his undeclared rental income was £162,500 over eight years, or £1,700 a month. But this was for two rooms in a partly derelict semi in an unlovely part of north London in the 1980s. Local lettings agents describe the estimates as laughably high.

    · Crucially, the documents reveal that a Revenue investigator himself believed that the department’s estimate was too high.

    “As regards the lettings assessments,” he says, “[they] are indefensibly high when viewed against the broader background. Even if the commissioners do display an enthusiasm to determine appeals in a positive sum, I would hesitate to encourage anything above three figures. In essence, I simply want to dispose of the appeals. I would not be unduly distressed to hear that all years had been discharged.” That takes the assessment from £162,500 to zero. The commissioners, who referee tax cases, never saw this memo and at a subsequent meeting accepted the Revenue’s estimates allowing inspectors, who knew Mr Cullinane was broke, to prosecute the bankruptcy.

    In the following years the Revenue persisted with his case, sending bailiffs and the police to repossess his house. After they sold it for £125,000 the Revenue took £18,000, other government departments helped themselves and accountants KPMG, appointed by the Revenue to look into the case, were paid £32,000. Mr Cullinane himself was left with nothing.

    Mr Cullinane believes he was the victim of the Revenue’s desire to obtain a “scalp” in its investigations into tax abuse in the film industry. But he is also a victim of tax legislation whereby the Revenue can assume all taxpayers are guilty until proven innocent. The problem is that a court case in 1995, two years after he was found guilty of non-payment of tax, re-established this principle and also that it is the taxpayer’s job to provide information for an assessment, not the Revenue’s.

    Inspectors can estimate income and call it an “assessment” of your earnings. The Revenue built up a case against Mr Cullinane even though he was supplying them with as much information as he could about when he worked, claimed benefit and went on holiday.

    Now, after a four-year investigation by Jobs & Money, his case has been laid bare. More than 200 pages of documents sent to him last month by the Revenue, combined with leaked documents posted, he assumes, by whistle-blowing tax staff, reveal that he was, in his words, “fitted up”.

    Memos from inspectors tell how Mr Cullinane had been identified by a newly created Film Industry Unit as their first investigation, and one they didn’t want to let go. He worked during the 1980s mainly for Warner Bros. From the mid 1980s, the Inland Revenue unit was pursuing the so-called “ghosts” in the film business – people who drifted in and out of work and were paid mainly in cash.

    Mr Cullinane’s case is so disturbing that this week Barry Gardiner, the MP for Brent North, says he will be calling for an adjournment debate in the House of Commons questioning the “governance” of the Inland Revenue and its ability to investigate complaints made by taxpayers.

    Mr Gardiner has already written a detailed letter to the chairman of the Revenue, Sir Nicholas Montagu, setting out all the inconsistencies in the case. The reply stated that all issues related to Mr Cullinane’s case have been dealt with in court. It refused to deal with the five specific points raised by the MP.

    But Mr Gardiner says the most disturbing aspect of the case is the assessment for lettings income. Internal correspondence shows it was based on information from someone variously called a “source” or “informant”. Inspectors also said they had a list of residents, taken partly from the electoral roll, that substantiated their assessment. But the memos and leaked information now in Mr Cullinane’s possession show the only two names on the list of occupants were the previous owners. The informant, says the Revenue, passed on details about tenants. Inspectors accepted the information as reliable. This informant has never been forced to reveal him or herself, as would happen in a court of law.

    A spokesman for the Revenue denies its investigations were based solely on the informant. “In addition to the informer’s information we had unexplained money into the bank accounts during the period; failure to make tax returns or provide accounts as he was required to do; Mr Cullinane’s own admission (made after strenuous denials) that he had let his property for some periods. Also no accounts/returns were made.”

    Mr Cullinane denies that he let rooms to anyone at any time, and denies he ever made a confession to Revenue officials that he did. He says the payments in his bank account that are “unexplained” have been explained by his accountant and are only a tiny fraction of the Revenue’s rental income figures.

    One might expect to find evidence of a champagne lifestyle from Mr Cullinane’s supposed lavish earnings. Yet there is no such evidence offered by the Revenue. MP Barry Gardiner, who has also been following the Cullinane case for many years, concludes: “What these memos appear to substantiate is what we have believed all along. This has been a terrible miscarriage of justice.”

    Twenty years war with the Revenue

    1982 Patrick Cullinane starts working at Elstree Studios as a stage hand for Warner Bros. He is put on emergency PAYE tax rate. Asks for a rebate, but is denied.

    1983 Warner shifts entire workforce to PAYE. Mr Cullinane continues to be taxed on emergency rate. Asks for rebate but is rejected.

    1986 Employs an accountant to pursue rebate. Revenue agrees to put him on basic tax, but refuses rebate.

    1987 Without his knowledge, he becomes target of first investigation by the Revenue’s new Film Industry Unit. Revenue demands unpaid tax of £500.

    1988-1991 Revenue demands escalate and Mr Cullinane becomes unemployed. He does not work again in the 1990s.

    1992 Revenue inspectors estimate Cullinane’s unpaid tax bill as £68,000, based on an estimate of £17,500 a year rental income over seven years from two spare rooms in his home, plus £90,000 from self-employed income from 1984-1988. Mr Cullinane is not allowed to see documents.

    1996 Revenue obtains bankruptcy order against Mr Cullinane.

    1998 Mr Cullinane’s house is repossessed after bailiffs and police kick down his door.

    1999 His house is sold for £125,000. The Revenue takes £18,000 while accountants KMPG, employed by the Revenue to look after Mr Cullinane’s assets, take £32,000. The Secretary of State takes £10,000, the mortgage lender takes back its £26,000, agents and valuers take £9,000, VAT is £10,000 and so on. Mr Cullinane is left with nothing.

    2000 Mr Cullinane begins court action to obtain his tax documents from the Revenue, but loses. The Revenue says it is under no obligation to reveal internal documents to prove case, and four judges agree.

    2003 In February the Revenue writes to Mr Cullinane saying it will now release “copies of our investigation folder”. In March he receives 200 pages of internal documents, which indicate that tax bills against Mr Cullinane were based on flimsy information or, in most cases, no information at all. Revenue denies wrongdoing.

    Tax

    Scams
    Income tax

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2003/may/10/tax.scamsandfraud

    PATRICK CULLIANE BECAME A LEADING CAMPAIGNER AND CASEWORKER IN THE FIGHT AGAINST INSTITUTIONALISED CORRUPTION, AND FOR JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE.

    THERE WAS NOT A CORRUPT JUDGE THAT HE WAS NOT AWARE OF.

  14. Dr David Staples. Chief Executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE),
    The governing body of Freemasonry in England, Wales, the Isle of Man.

    Dr David Staples can be contacted by:
    Emailing: info@ugle.org.uk or by emailing his secretary cmenditta@ugle.org.uk
    or writing to Dr David Staples 60 Great Queen St, Holborn, London WC2B 5AZ

    COURT OF APPEAL HAS STILL NOT RECEIVED THE RE-TRANSFERRING ORDER

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?

    BARRISTER MR DAY: It does.

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    BARRISTER MR DAY: Yes

  15. International Child Abductions Slovak Embassy Round Table On Child Protection
    – Full List Of Participants

    Ms Helene Clift

    Legal Director UK, ICACU

    International Child Abduction and Contact Unit, Office of the Official Solicitor (ICACU)

  16. 18th May 2020

    Since these videos were made, Austria has decided that the perfectly sane intellectual, Peter Hofschroer, is to be incarcerated for the rest of his life. This ARTIBRARY DETENTION FOR LIFE judicial decision has been made on the basis of fraudulent psychiatric reports. PETER HOFSCHROER HAS NEVER BEEN EXAMINED BY A PSYCHIATRIST IN AUSTRIA.

    By all international standards in law, this is outright corruption and fraud on the court.

    The perpetrator, Professor Dr. Manfred Walzl is a so-called court witness who is not registered as such with the governing medical body for court witnesses. He was paid 116.20 Euros for each of two false psychiatric reports.

  19. Had my hearing in August 2018 with Oliver as a presiding judge. He is as racist as racist can be with the disgusting and obscene remarks he made against me and my children. He referred to my son as ‘horse nostril’ I have never heard of this term before but I think he was referring to the shape of an African Caribbeans nose. made a complaint to the judicial conduct investigations office and received a response in November 2018 that I was lying. They also said recordings cannot be obtained. Sounds like a continuous pattern of unacceptable behaviour going on

  20. I am so sorry you had to experience that. It’s not as if you weren’t having enough problems by the fact that you were in court in the first place. Everyone has said that he is a nasty bully. It seems that he cannot have any common decency, much less a judicial code of ethics.

  22. Contact the Ministry of Justice

    You’re contacting the Ministry of Justice about Judicial Corruption

    The following information may help:

    Overseas Business Risk – Dominican Republic
    The British Embassy Santo Domingo invites project proposals for 2016 Bilateral Programme Fund.
    Bereavement information – Philippines: murder, manslaughter and suspicious deaths
    More results

    Do you still need to contact the Ministry of Justice
    Yes
    No

    (That about sums it up, doesn’t it?)

    See for yourself https://contact-moj.service.justice.gov.uk/correspondence/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&correspondence%5Btopic%5D=Judicial+Corruption&commit=Continue

    See all the choices you could have had from the Ministry when seeking contacting it about Judicial Corrupton:

    https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=Judicial+Corruption&order=relevance

    What a laugh, try the website out for yourselves. The things they don’t want you to know about won’t be on there. No doubt they paid some professional idiot contractors a lot of money for this.

    Contact the Ministry of Justice? They don’t want you to. They delete nearly all the emails you send them. By doing it this way, you will not have a record of what you sent to them. THIS IS THE IDEA BEHIND IT. They simply don’t want to deal with the public.

  23. It is disgraceful that the Ministry of Justice posts such completely OUT OF DATE information, and creates such a useless webpage.

    Look at this one. Some of these people are no longer even around!

    What a shoddy service. Tell your MP (on the off chance that you may have one that is not compromised and might actually do something for you).

    Home

    Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption: members

    Cabinet Office

    Policy paper
    Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption: members

    Published 29 July 2015

    The Inter-Ministerial Group on Anti-Corruption oversees the government’s work to tackle corruption domestically and internationally.

    Membership

    UK Government Anti-Corruption Champion – The Rt Hon Sir Eric Pickles MP (co-chair)
    Minister of State, Home Office – The Rt Hon Mike Penning MP (co-chair)
    Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office – The Rt Hon Hugo Swire MP
    Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills – The Rt Hon Anna Soubry MP
    Minister of State, Department for International Development – The Rt Hon Desmond Swayne TD MP
    Economic Secretary to the Treasury – Harriet Baldwin MP
    Solicitor General – Robert Buckland QC MP
    Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice – Dominic Raab MP
    Director of Public Prosecutions – Alison Saunders
    Director, Serious Fraud Office – David Green CB QC
    Director-General, National Crime Agency – Keith Bristow
    Commissioner, Metropolitan Police – Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe
    Commissioner, City of London Police – Adrian Leppard

    Other ministers and officials will be invited as and when required.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inter-ministerial-group-on-anti-corruption-members/inter-ministerial-group-on-anti-corruption-members

  24. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LAWYERS BEHAVING BADLY

    The barristers below all held Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, issued by psychiatrists
    to protect me, following my exposure to Toxic Aircraft Cabin Fumes that contained neurotoxins
    including organophosphates.

    Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Jermy Royds wrote: Leonard Lawrence interests must be protected.

    However, rather than protect me and register the Court of Protection Medical Certificate with
    the Court of Protection the lawyers went on a revenue gathering exercise for themselves.

    THE BARRISTERS NAMES ARE BELOW:

    The first Court of Protection Medical Certificate was held by barrister Dominic BRAZIL in 2004.
    The third & fourth Court of Protection Medical Certificate was held by barrister Nicholas Allen.
    The first, third and fourth Court of Protection Medical Certificate held by Caroline Wilbourne.

    Barrister Dominic Brazil
    1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, Temple, London EC4Y 7DB
    clerks@1kbw.co.uk

    Barrister, now Recorder Nicholas Allen QC
    29 Bedford Row Chambers, Holborn, London WC1R 4HE
    clerks@29br.co.uk

    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne Temple, London, EC4Y 9BJ
    clerks@1gc.com

    WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

    Barrister Dominic Brazil
    Stephens Road Chambers 84 Stephens Rd TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne
    1 Garden Court Chambers 57-60 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, Holborn, London WC2A 3LJ,
    clerks@1gc.com

    Recorder Nicholas Allen QC St. Ives Chambers, 1-3 Whittall St, Birmingham B4 6DH,
    Door tenant since February 2018.
    familyclerks@stiveschambers.co.uk

    Leonard Lawrence

  25. I wonder when the above committee is going to start work on domestic corruption? They could start with the allegations made on this website. But will they? They have never tackled domestic corruption in their lives. The whole system is corrupt and it was set up deliberately to allow for the type of crime and legal racketeering you see described on this website.

    There is no proper auditing and oversight of judicial decisions and court process. This must change, and we cannot have the corrupt overseeing the corrupt.

    None of these cases are unusual. People have been fighting for justice for decades at least. Even Dickens knew about the corruption in the legal system.

    It’s a wonder that Eric Pickles (the first ‘anti-corruption tsar’) doesn’t still have his name on this outdated list.

    HE DID NOTHING EITHER.

  26. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    On the 8 February 2006 Consultant Psychiatrist Wing Commander Professor
    Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych RAF Rtd wrote a medical report about myself
    to the Royal Courts of Justice London. The report cannot be disclosed and was
    destroyed by the Ministry of Justice around 2013.

    The report is marked as follows:

    LEONARD MICHAEL LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST
    NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Mr. Justice, now Lord Justice Adrian FULFORD has never explained why he upheld
    a decision in January 2013 by Master Basil Yoxall, in the Queens Bench Division,
    not to disclose Wing Commander Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych
    medical report to the following: Family Division, Court of Protection and the Court
    of Appeal when Mrs. Justice Pauffley, had instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer
    my case to the Court of Appeal and His Honour Judge Philip Waller CBE had instructed
    that all files be sent to the Court of Protection and an Appeal filed.

    Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych files and those files held by Lord Justice
    Adrian FULFORD in 2013 have been recovered for me. Photos of these files were
    shown to the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC on the 13 October 2018. The files contained
    Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3’s and one CP2.

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

  27. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LEONARD MICHAEL LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST
    NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Following Mr. Justice, now Lord Justice Adrian FULFORD, court order in February
    2013 upholding Master Basil Yoxall order not to disclose Professor Gordon Turnbull
    FRCP FRCPsych Court of Protection Medical Report CP2 to the Family Division, Court
    of Protection and the Court of Appeal, in June 2013 the Crown Prosecution Service
    request Thames Valley Police to visit me.

    The request was assigned to Devon and Cornwall Police. Over 7 years later and PC Emma
    Pack (now Sgt Emma Story-Barrett) Devon and Cornwall Police has still to visit me.

    An entry in Devon and Cornwall Police Log falsy alleges that PC Emma Pack attended
    my home. Chief Superintendent Claire Armes, now with Avon and Somerset Police,
    may care to explain why PC Emma Pack misconduct was neutralized given that Claire
    Armes had reviewed PC Emma Pack conduct when a Detective Superintendent at
    Devon and Cornwall Police.

    Leonard Lawrence

  28. I’m still speechless that the ministry of justice used taxpayers money to take a litigant in person to court where the outcome was already predetermined and the case was heard by justice Julian Knowles with a prearranged judgement which was uploaded by matrix chambers on their website 12 days before the order was handed down by justice Julian Knowles. My question is quite simple, why on earth would the ministry of justice use so much money in this litigation when they already had the outcome they wanted which was granted to them from the very beginning? The taxpayer has been duped with fraudulent activity which then progressed with fabricated media articles. It looks as though matrix chambers has made a lot of money (six-figure sums) for doing nothing! I hope that paedophile judge Simon Oliver is worth all this money

  29. Is this child abductor of a judge still working as a judge or is he suspended from duty? It would be inappropriate for him to hear cases with allegations over allegations made against him online! If he is hearing cases, our argument is with the government who have failed us in order to protect the VIP paedophile rings

  30. Dear all
    I remember some people have commented on this site talking about how the Ministry of Justice spent £50,000 in the High court litigation against me for Simon Oliver’s benefit. However, what everyone else does not know is that more money has been spent in protecting Simon Oliver by the Ministry of Justice. In Simon Oliver’s witness statement against me in the High court, he said that Thames Valley Police has put in a special alarm at his home with a 5-minute response time which involves him pressing a panic button. This was funded by the taxpayer. This alarm system was upgraded by the Ministry of Justice in 2017 to make it even more sophisticated. This was once again funded by the taxpayer. The amount of money that the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police have put into protect Simon Oliver has gone into the hundreds of thousands of pounds! If that was not enough, they even have spent money funding a flat for him in Waterloo so he does not have to go home. It would be nice if they spend this money on the NHS or even on disciplinary action against him. Is there anyway someone can go back to Government and ask them who financed all of this money for Simon Oliver and his protection. I don’t think it’s the Berkshire Freemasons because their funding is very limited. It sickens me to think that over £200,000 has been spent in protecting Simon Oliver to date. Oh and yes the judgement was prearranged as well because Matrix chambers had a copy of the finalised approved judgement which they uploaded on their website 12 days before it was handed down by the High court. The cheek that the Government Legal Department had to ask me for £40,000 costs to give to Simon Oliver when in fact, he never paid for the litigation himself in the first place! This is fraudulent activity where money was going to get stolen from me! I never paid any money to them and said to them that they can pursue me. To date, they have not asked me for the money ever again. This is because everything I said back to them about this dodgy litigation was correct. Didn’t Mr Lawrence go through enough by having his assets stolen by Simon Oliver using similar strategies!
    Kindest regards.

  31. Jack Straw scraps rule saying judges must declare if they are masons

    The justice secretary is scrapping a rule about freemasonry declarations that he played a role in introducing 12 years ago
    Andrew Sparrow
    @AndrewSparrow
    Thu 5 Nov 2009 17.30 GMT

    The government introduced the declaration rule after it was recommended by the Commons home affairs committee in a report published in March 1997. The committee said that “nothing so much undermines public confidence in public institutions as the knowledge that some public servants are members of a secret society one of whose aims is mutual self-advancement”. At the time Straw said Labour supported the recommendation.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2009/nov/05/jack-straw-judges-masons

  32. J Shaikh says:
    May 27, 2020 at 11:47 pm ear all

    Dear Mr. Shaikh

    Re: Ministry of Justice spent £50,000 in the High court litigation against you
    for Simon Oliver’s benefit.

    In my case, the costs to the Government has exceeded £500,000 (half a million).
    Including 10 years of costs of neurorehabilitation, following my organophosphate
    poisoning.

    Had HHJ Simon Oliver complied with Mrs. Justice Puffley instructions in February
    2013 all of these costs could have been recovered from barrister Dominic BRAZIL,
    solicitor Graeme S. FRASER and BP Collins Solicitors for failing to disclose my
    protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence

  33. Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION (HIGH COSTS, SPECIAL CASES UNIT)
    RE; LEONARD LAWRENCE
    THE CASE POSES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION TO BE ANSWERED BY THE COURT

    The above question was answered on the 20 March 2012 by solicitor May Maughan,
    Deputy Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts. Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of
    the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts made all clinical and financial decision on
    Leonard Lawrence by not disclosing the Court of Protection Medical Certificates that
    she held to any court !!!!!

    The following barrister’s Chambers, financed by the Legal Services Commission
    were briefed on Leonard Lawrences’s case by Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors:

    Hardwicke Chambers
    Hardwicke Bldg, New Square, Holborn, London WC2A 3SB, United Kingdom
    Barrister Barbara Hewson (specializes Court of Protection work)

    St John’s Chambers Bristol
    101 Victoria St, Redcliffe, Avon, Bristol BS1 6PU, United Kingdom
    Barrister Vanessa McKinlay Clinical Negligence
    Barrister Jody Atkinson

    St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    55 Temple Row, Birmingham B2 5LS, United Kingdom

    HOW COULD SOLICITOR PAUL HICKS AND SOLICITOR MARGARITA TYNE HAVE BRIEFED
    THE ABOVE CHAMBERS PRIOR TO OBTAINING LEONARD LAWRENCE’S CASE FILES FROM
    THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ON THE 20 MARCH 2012. ONE MONTH PRIOR
    TO THE HEARING BEFORE HHJ SIMON OLIVER ON THE 16 APRIL 2012?

  34. Dear All
    We have now created our tik tok page under judge Simon Oliver’s name. This will make our campaign go even more international! Please take a look at our tik tok page and view the video that we have created so far. Please feel free to comment and ask others to comment on it as well.

    https://vm.tiktok.com/KmbLSg/

    https://vm.tiktok.com/KmvPAj/

    From all of us at judges behaving badly

  35. Stephanie Hack Head of The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office

    Joshua Rozenberg:
    We need to be more open about punishing badly-behaved judges

    http://www.legalcheek.com › lc-journal-posts › joshua-rozen…
    Nov 23, 2017 – Its joint heads, Stephanie Hack and Joanna Otterburn,
    currently run the JCIO on a job-share.

  36. Joshua Rozenberg: We need to be more open about …
    http://www.legalcheek.com › lc-journal-posts › joshua-rozen…
    Nov 23, 2017 – The current law, in section 11(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981,
    is to the … Its joint heads, Stephanie Hack and Joanna Otterburn, currently run
    the … Of 2,078 complaints finalised during the year 2016/17, a total of 42 were upheld. …

    It’s the job of the JCIO to sift incoming complaints. … Nov 23 2017 9:42am.

  37. Subject: Re: THE DOCTRINE OF WILFUL BLINDNESS: BRITAIN’S RULE OF LAW /
    Freemasonry – W.Bro***

    Dear all,

    I am a freemason, I would know a thing or two about this.

    Having spent the last 3+ years in covert operations investigating judicial and police
    corruption after having fallen foul myself to the cesspool of corruption known as the
    UK justice system, our masonic craft is being used intensively by the taxpayer sponsored
    state terrorists as a tool of the trade. I say as follows:

    The Law Society is one of the most masonic institutions in the world. Lawyers are all
    actively encouraged to become freemasons. Freemasonry is enshrined in all the four
    Inns of Court. In the middle of the 12th century, the military Order of the Knights
    Templar built the round church by the Thames which became known as the Temple
    Church. Circa 200 years later, after the abolition of the Order in 1312, lawyers occupied
    the Temple site and buildings. They formed themselves into two societies, the Inner
    Temple and Middle Temple. The entire legal profession in the UK was effectively
    founded upon freemasonry.

    The term “masonic firm” is used widely in the UK legal profession. This is because
    there is a preponderance of firms and chambers that are operated exclusively by
    brethren. It refers to those firms of solicitors and barrister’s chambers whose senior
    partners are, without exception and as part of a policy, freemasons, fellow brethren.

    In those firms, most of the partners will be “on the xxxxxx”. Some masonic firms
    will not allow non-masonic partners. Masonic code is used most frequently both by
    members of the Bar and the compromised judiciary and these codes are used to obtain
    preferential treatment and to communicate in code during proceedings.

    W.Bro***

  38. Perhaps the hand signals used by Simon Oliver with his cohorts in the court room are Masonic hand signals?

  39. Len

    To coin a phrase re Simon Oliver…….’you’ve got him by the balls’!

    Don’t let go my friend……simply put more pressure on because he has disgraced himself
    by ruining the lives of others against all Masonic and ethical principles.

    Indeed if you read the Charge after initiation, every Mason has a personal responsibility
    to behave in a manner which is ‘useful to mankind and become an ornament to the society’
    Simon Oliver is a crook and there is nothing honourable about him……that is why I refuse
    to refer to him by his title.

    All the best

  40. Leonard

    Freemasons……

    The one that springs to mind immediately is Kenneth Noye…..the M25 murderer.

    Simon Oliver, I am horrified to learn more and more bad things about him.

    What he did to you is immoral and unethical and it offends every sense of decency
    within me. If his Lodge are aware of his underhand dealings they will likewise be
    shocked and truly saddened by his dreadful behaviour.

    He needs a criminal record to be sacked from his Lodge ……at least that is my
    understanding. I don’t think you can join a Lodge if you have a criminal record
    and an individual would need a dispensation from Grand Lodge in order to meet
    entry requirements. I know of two individuals with such dispensations for minor
    misdemeanours when they were teenagers.

    I belong to ….Lodge. My loyalty is to you in this instance and I want to be completely
    honest and transparent with you. I care about you being safe and feeling safe and
    fighting for the justice that you so richly deserve.

    I am shocked by the response (or lack of response) that you have had from the Grand
    Secretary David Staples……I would have expected far more support and engagement
    from him.

  41. Any inaction from McFarlane, Burnett, Heaton, and Buckland (and there appears to have been no action) is a clear indication that they are involved and that Oliver’s activities are either state sanctioned or the whole crew is involved in criminal racketeering and/or are compromised in some way, wouldn’t you say?

  42. From Leonard Lawrence
    Dear Anonymous

    Anonymous says:
    June 3, 2020 at 2:01 pm

    Any inaction from McFarlane, Burnett, Heaton, and Buckland (and there appears to have been no action)
    is a clear indication that they are involved and that Oliver’s activities are either state-sanctioned or the
    whole crew is involved in criminal racketeering and/or are compromised in some way, wouldn’t you say?

    Lord Burnett [Lord Chief Justice Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales].
    Sir Andrew McFarlane [President of the Family Division and Court of Protection].
    Sir Richard Heaton [Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice].
    Robert Buckland QC [Lord Chancellor, and Secretary of State for Justice].

    Officers have visited me, they were not police officers or National Crime Agency Officers.
    Their occupation was Government Service.

    They wanted to view the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that enable the solicitor
    Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts to hold me in a comatose
    state for 18 months, without access to the Court of Protection.

    The officers knew details about myself and a great deal about HHJ Simon Oliver. I was given
    instructions to follow, that I complied with. The Court of Protection, Medical Certificate,
    issued by Dr. Jeremy Royds, Cygnet Healthcare on the 27 January 2005 (without a medical)
    was sent to a Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames
    Valley Police for confirmation as to the authenticity of the Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificate.

    Almost 10 months later, there has been no response from Chief Constable John Campell
    and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg.

    Sir Richard Heaton [Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice] could assist me by
    naming the person within the Ministry of Justice that authorised the litigation cost in the
    case HHJ Simon Oliver v Javed Shaikh. HHJ Simon Oliver falsely accused me in his statement
    of making two specific comments on this website.

    The officer (ex-Government Service) that drove me to the meeting with the Attorney
    General was present at my home at the time and date HHJ Simon Oliver alleges that I made
    the post on this website.

    I suggest that HHJ Simon Olivers knows exactly who made the comments. HHJ Oliver, you
    removed a 14 year old from her home and sent her to a children’s home. The teenager ran
    away. In August 2017 Thames Valley Police conducted a major search.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Olivers’ I have no need to go to your home.

    Members associated with Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Olivers Masonic Lodge
    ‘The Berkshire Masters’ Lodge No 3684′ Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road,
    Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA, United Kingdom have spoken and have visited me.

    Leonard Lawrence

  43. FTAO Anthony Stansfeld
    Police and Crime Commissioner for the Thames Valley,

    THAMES VALLEY POLICE
    RE: LEONARD LAWRENCE
    FILE RECEIVED BACK FROM CPS (CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE)
    YESTERDAY-REVIEWED: NEED TO SET UP APPOINTMENT TO DISCUSS…
    THAT THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE.

    Almost 15 years later and Thames Valley Police have still to set up the appointment!

    Leonard Lawrence

  44. Len, would you say that Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police are relatively honest?

  45. Hi
    It’s been all over the news today that the Madeleine McCann abductor has been found. I’m just wondering whether Simon Oliver has anything to do with it because he’s also a child abductor and I believe he was around that area at that very time claiming his gift but I guess it could be a possibility that it’s not him because his preference is young boys

  46. It probably was him all along. It explains why the government in the UK has been financing it so much to protect him. It’s just that some poor man who is already in a German prison has been selected to take the fall for it to keep the public quiet. But in all seriousness, the reason why the Madeleine McCann case is so significant is because Gordon Brown raped a 9-year-old girl back when he was in university and it is alleged that Madeleine McCann was selected by a gang in retaliation to what Gordon Brown did. The nine-year-old girl that Gordon Brown raped was the daughter of a prostitute who Gordon Brown paid money to. The 9-year old girl was raped by Gordon Brown and a group of other men that he was with at the time. This is why the UK government has been financing all of this money for all these years to find the perpetrator because they are trying to keep their dirty little secrets behind closed doors. It was the same Government Legal Department and Simon Oliver with the assistance and protection from the Ministry of Justice that falsely accused Mr Sheikh of plotting an anthrax attack! What a shame

  47. Anonymous says:
    June 3, 2020, at 11:41 pm
    Len, would you say that Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police are relatively honest?

    Dear Anonymous,

    Relatively honest?

    Stephen Hayes kindly sent me two signed books free of charge.

    THE BIGGEST GANG IN BRITTAIN ISBN-13: 978-1781486061
    (To Leonard enjoy the read)

    FIFTY SHADES OF BLACK AND BLUE ISBN-13: 978-1781488355
    (To Leonard. Maybe? memories.)

    Stephen also wrote another book:

    TOP SECRETS ISBN-13: 978-1781483398

    Stephen Hayes highlights many cases of injustice, including the two below:

    1. Colin Stagg was formally acquittal in September 1994 of Rachel Nickell’s murder
    2. The case of Stefan Kiszcko and one of THE BIGGEST MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE.
    ‘The worst miscarriage of all time’ – how a botched West …

    —————————————————————-
    FIFTY SHADES OF BLACK AND BLUE (To Leonard Maybe? memories.)

    YES STEPHEN!

    A Chief Inspector with the Royalty and Diplomatic Protection Group was giving evidence
    against me. When swearing an oath to the court the Chief Inspector gave a Masonic vocal
    signal to the court. The judge immediately informed the jury of what had occurred.

    Not all Freemasons in judicial and police service behave like HHJ Simon Oliver.

    Leonard Lawrence

  48. There appears to be a link missing with reference to Britain’s “relatively honest police”

  49. COULD SOMEONE ASSIST ME BY IDENTIFYING THE DATE THAT DETECTIVE CHIEF
    SUPERINTENDENT TIM DE MEYER CEASED TO BE THE HEAD OF PROFESSIONAL
    STANDARDS AT THAMES VALLEY POLICE ?

    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine was appointed Head of Professional
    Standards Department, in April 2019
    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence

    ————————————————————————-
    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 02 June 2020 16:00

    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine
    Head of Professional Standards
    Thames Valley Police

    Dear Detective Chief Superintendent Paine,

    Ref: Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer – Crime and Criminal Justice.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer took over the role of Head of Thames
    Valley Police Professional Standards Department from Detective Chief Superintendent
    Nikki Ross on 6th January 2014.

    Could you please advise me of the date Detective Chief Superintendent (now Assistant
    Chief Constable Tim De Meyer) ceased in that position as Head of Thames Valley Police
    Professional Standards Department?

    Thank you for your assistance

    Leonard Lawrence

  50. Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine
    Head of Professional Standards
    Thames Valley Police

    Dear Detective Chief Superintendent Paine,

    On the 3 February 2016, I received a letter from Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell,
    when Head of the Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police, alleging that an
    internal review of my case found that there was no evidence to open an investigation.

    THIS IS NOW KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN UNTRUE

    The Independent Police Complaints Commission/ Independent Office for Police Conduct
    documents that have been posted to me identify that Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell
    was receiving instructions from one or more senior Thames Valley Police officers.

    Could you please identify the Head of Professional Standards, Thames Valley Police, for
    the years 2015 and 2016.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    ———————————————————————-
    Economic Crime Conference 2019
    26 Nov -27 Nov 2019 The Crowne Plaza Hotel, Stratford-upon-Avon

    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations,
    City of London Police

    Biography

    Gavin Tyrrell is a police officer leading the City of London and National Lead Force
    Fraud Operations. His portfolio covers Complex Economic Crime investigations,
    Money Laundering, Bribery and Corruption, Asset Recovery as well as proactive
    operations.

    Gavin began his service with Thames Valley Police working largely in covert policing
    roles fighting organised crime before becoming head of economic and cybercrime in
    2011.

    Transferring to the City of London Police Gavin and his teams now also support complex
    investigation across the United Kingdom to enhance local capability and service delivery.

    Experienced working across Europe, US and Africa, Gavin is the United Kingdom’ economic
    crime representative to the European Union and has influenced recent policy amendments

  51. Great Revelations, keep at it. Stephen Hayes author The Biggest Gang in Britain trilogy, Amazon plus my videos on Stephen Hayes Grumpy on Facebook. Stay safe & keep at it.

  52. I am unable to view the post below on the JBB website ???

    ________________________________

  53. Do you have evidence of Judge Simon Oliver being a child abductor? If you don’t, then you need to be very careful about making statements like this.

  54. Was Gordon Brown charged and convicted? What is the source of your information?

  57. Systemic corruption – The fact is that the UK is systemically corrupt

    Unless you or someone you know has been affected, you may not even know that the UK is systemically corrupt, some may not even know what we are talking about when we say systemic corruption. What we are referring to is grand corruption, endemic and culturally accepted dishonesty, out of control civil servants and corrupt practices rife throughout the police, the Attorney General’s Office, the Serious Fraud Office, the Ministry of Justice, HMCTS, the judiciary and the courts themselves through to the Law Society, BEIS and the Insolvency Service, Parliament, all of the regulatory authorities, national and the government quango offshoots.

    READ FULL ARTICLE HERE: http://www.intelligenceuk.com/sharenow.html

  58. “Historically, we have constructed corruption as something that is exclusively a problem in developing or economically ‘primitive’ societies, rather than our own. Yet the almost daily reporting of all manner of corruption cases in our most prominent and powerful institutions is beginning to unravel the idea that the British establishment is predicated on civilized values of ‘fairness’, ‘openness’ and ‘transparency’. A seemingly endless conveyor belt of cases has shown no signs of slowing down. Indeed, if anything, it has accelerated.”

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/harry-blain/how-corrupt-is-house-of-lords

  59. Mr. & Mrs. Musa were wrongly accused of a crime by social workers, and served time in prison. Their seven children were subsequently taken from them under these unlawful circumstances and adopted out. Their whole file needs a complete review. Their children need to be restored to them.

    Seven children were taken from just one family on false allegations of child abuse by London’s Haringey Council. The Musas served time in prison for a crime they did not commit, and were subsequently deported without their children.

    As you will see from the information, Haringey Council acted criminally in deceiving the judiciary, yet no attempt at returning the children to the parents has been made.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10946414/Judge-slams-Haringey-council-over-my-most-shocking-family-case-ever.html

    http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed129178

    http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/london-borough-of-haringey-v-musa-2014-ewhc-1341-fam?#.VckvcbtRGh1

    Justice has not been served for the Musas.

  60. Len
    Tell these pricks there is a clear distinction between a MISTAKE and FRAUD

  61. As you say – not mistakes but deliberate, planned deception – and perversion of justice at the highest level.….

  62. Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear Mr Jones,

    Re: Committal Proceedings.

    Committal Proceedings against Mr Javed Sheikh regarding the website:
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver judges behaving badly.

    I am advised that WBro HHJ Simon Oliver has requested the Ministry of Justice
    and Treasury Solicitors to instigated Committal Proceedings against Mr Javed
    Sheikh. I understand that Mr Javed Sheikh requests that I give evidence.

    Yours sincerely,
    Leonard Lawrence

    ———————————————————————-
    To: The Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry,
    The Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver,
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road,
    Sindlesham,
    Wokingham,
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Worshipful Brother Simon,

    Masonic Motto: Audi Vide Tace; Hear. See. Be Silent

    In the Committal Proceedings that you have actioned against Mr Javed Sheikh
    you have made two FALSE allegations against myself Leonard Lawrence, falsely
    alledging that I made posts on the website: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver Judges
    Behaving Badly, under the name of ‘FUCK OLIVER’.

    The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Freemasons’ Hall, Great Queen Street,
    London WC2B 5AZ

    Worshipful Brother Simon,
    In 2013 a meeting took place at The United Grand Lodge of England in London.
    Present was a Grand Officer and Provincial Grand Officers, Officers of Senior
    London Grand Rank, and London Grand Rank. The focus was on what Worshipful
    Brother HHJ Simon Oliver and two Government Agencies had done to me.

    On the 9 September 2010, Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk
    Chambers, London, wrote to advise me that barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench
    Walk, had admitted that I had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection when
    he, Dominic Brazil, had placed upon me Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in costs and
    inferences without informing the Court of Protection. Nineteen months prior to the
    hearing before Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver, at Reading County Court.

    What was not known at that time was that in February 2013 Worshipful Brother Simon,
    was instructed by Mrs Justice Pauffley to re-transfer my case SL09Do938 to the Civil
    Court of Appeal. Worshipful Brother Simon, you have still to make that order. Also,
    the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) having reviewed my case had requested Thames
    Valley Police to visit me. This they have still to action.

    Worshipful Brother Simon, you had conducted a Court of Protection hearing on the
    16 April 2012 and made a judgement on the 30 August 2012 when you did not hold
    a Court of Protection authorisation at that time! Secondly, the Senior District Judge
    Principal Registry of the Family Division (authorised Court of Protection Judge) had
    in September 2012 instructed that my files are sent to the Court of Protection and an
    appeal filed. Worshipful Brother Simon you did not comply with those instructions.

    The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) had loaned me monies to buy food, pay for
    heating and the care for an assistance dog. However, the bullying against me continued,
    so much that I was visited by number …. security district London. It then stopped.

    In 2016 the membership list of the Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 was sent to me.
    The now-former Provincial Grand Secretary, of Berkshire Freemason WBro David Keys,
    also a member of the Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 will tell you what happened.
    WBro David Keys will also explain why I no longer have a neurological Support Dog!

    Worshipful Brother Simon, what was puzzling in your written judgement dated the 30th
    August 2012 was the reference that I could not provide evidence that Reading County
    Court was advised in August 2005 that Laurence Oates (The Official Solicitor) had
    not agreed the sale of my home. The evidence was located at Reading County Court!
    I also suggest that you had it electronically on the 17 April 2012. That is why, according
    to solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP, you telephoned my barrister and warned
    him off. My barrister withdrew from my case.

    I was also told to pay £10,000 to barrister Dominic Brazil for a one hour hearing, when
    I was funded by the Special Cases Unit, Legal Services Commission.

    Worshipful Brother Simon,
    On the 18 August, 2005 barrister Simon Calhaem 29 Bedford Row Chambers, accompanied
    by Siobhan Baillie, instructed by Laurence Oates (The Official Solicitor) informed HHJ
    Charles Elly that Laurence Oates had not agreed the sale value of my home.

    Siobhan Baillie is now:
    Siobhan Baillie MP Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Ministry of Justice

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC MP when Attorney General for England and Wales was handed a
    copy of Siobhan Baillie notes, taken on the 18 August 2005. The now-former Freemason
    that drove me to the meeting has an association with the Ministry of Defence.

    Worshipful Brother Simon, with some encouragment from Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC MP
    two police forces have recently disclosed many many documents. Had both Police Forces
    disclosed the intelligence that they had obtained to the judiciary my case would have been
    concluded 10 years ago!

    One of the forces ‘Thames Valley Police’ in one year were found not to have recorded over
    35,000 offences including rape, sexual assaults, and domestic violence. The officers
    suppressing my case have been identified and can be named, starting with the now-former
    Detective Superintendent Gillian (Gill) Vannessa Wootton. Gill has a long history with me
    going back to 2004.

    There are even bigger fish within the Ministry of Justice and Government Legal Services.
    Unfortunately, the biggest two have died. Vanessa Davies (Director General) Bar Standards
    Board wrote to me following a meeting in London, advising that the Bar Standards Board
    had been misled by Alastair Pitblado the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts who had
    written to the Bar Standards Board advising that I had not been a Court of Protection
    patient, as Vanessa Davies writes in her letter to me, that is not true from the evidence
    now available.

    The above may explain why Sue Carr QC now The Right Honourable Lady Justice Carr, Lady
    Justice of Appeal and others did not participate in the Bar Standards Board review of my case.

    Last year two farmers came to see me, they bought me some apples and stayed for about
    30 minutes and left. Two weeks later they returned, they were not farmers. They had
    information about my former occupation and specific information on HHJ Simon Oliver.

    They wanted to view the Court of Protection Medical Certificates used to hold me for 18
    months whilst I was asset stripped. In less than 30 seconds they questioned why none
    of the Court of Protection Medical Certificates had the embossed seal of the Court of
    Protection on them.

    I was instructed to send a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, to Thames Valley Police
    to ascertain the authenticity of the certificate. Ten months later no reply!

    Masonic Motto: Audi Vide Tace; Hear. See. Be Silent

    Leonard Lawrence

    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  63. Len, I think you mentioned that Oliver had committed more acts of slander and libel against you.

    With the evidence that everyone has against him, I wonder if Oliver will exit the Old Bailey without handcuffs?

  64. It remains vitally important that we continue to modernise Freemasonry and to make it more accessible to modern man without trivialising its true values. By which I mean Respect, Integrity, Friendship and Charity.

    This Annual Meeting of Provincial Grand Lodge marks the start of the new masonic year and that inevitably brings change. In addition to welcoming all the incoming Acting Provincial Officers, I would like to thank all those who are standing down for the support and commitment that they have given during their term of office.

    This year marks the retirement of W Bro Terry Speight after four years as Provincial Grand Orator and I congratulate him on his preferment to Grand Rank in recognition of the esteem in which he is held. The role of Provincial Grand Orator has now changed and I have taken the opportunity of reconfiguring the appointment to incorporate that of the former non-collared Provincial Preceptor. I welcome W Bro Simon Oliver to this appointment.

    READ MORE https://www.berkspgl.org.uk/p/provincial-grand-masters-address-2019/

  65. Len,
    Congratulations on the new evidence; the date you received it now means you can forward
    it to Lisa Perkins with a letter before claim for judicial review of the decision, by TVP, not
    to investigate H H J Simon Oliver and the others for working with a common purpose to
    deprive you of your assets; outside a properly constituted Court of Protection; by using
    fake documentation.
    regards
    Argus

  66. Surely groups of public officials working in criminal joint enterprise(s) (common purpose) must AUTOMATICALLY carry a life sentence? However, Len’s is not the only case. Too bad they abolished hanging. Of course there may be some freemasons involved in this joint enterprise too ………..

  67. PUBLIC STATEMENT

    Due to recent events of which I have been made aware of via email, I have chosen to post here, as I know the legal team of HHJ Oliver monitor this site. I need them to read this and take serious note.
    I also want Ms. Louisa Lloyd-Jones (and Mr Javed Sheikh) to note, that in court it can be proven that Judge Oliver and his team are reading everything here, and they will certainly read this and will have no excuse to continue with at least 2 allegations made against Mr. Sheikh contributing to the grounds for the warrant they are seeking for his arrest.

    Facts ;

    HHJ Oliver recently made an application for the arrest and imprisonment of a Mr J Sheikh. The application was made by

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones. Senior Lawyer at Government Legal Department.

    The application includes a statement of ‘’facts’’ with allegations as to why HHJ Oliver and Lloyd Jones are asking that Sheikh be imprisoned.
    While I can not make comment on many of the allegations, I can however make a public statement as to at least two of those allegations being absolutely false.
    I vehemently oppose the fact Mr. Sheik is being accused of contempt of court on two counts which have nothing to do with him whatsoever;

    False allegations on court application prepared by Ministry of justice Lawyer Louisa Lloyd Jones and HHJ Simon Oliver;

    1/ that Mr. Sheikh is responsible for the Oliver Eight website.
    An absolutely false allegation which has been included as fact and as a stand-alone point of contempt of court, within court documents against Mr. Sheikh.
    ‘The Oliver eight’ website was set up by me and other colleagues as a platform to prepare to present Judicial victim allegations against HHJ Oliver with supporting DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Mr. Sheikh has absolutely no connection to TheOliverEight website and has absolutely zero influence over its content or in having it removed from the web.
    https://www.theolivereight.online/

    2/ Mr. Sheikh has also been falsely accused on another stand-alone point of contempt of court, as being responsible for the online ‘’Survey Hero HHJ Oliver questionnaire’’ for possible victims.
    https://surveyhero.com/c/0170b856

    The first paragraph of the survey web page states;

    ‘’This questionnaire has been created to support an investigation into abuse of power, errors of law, obstruction of Justice and possible unlawful and/or criminal activity by the British Judge, HHJ Simon Oliver.
    The questionnaire will be used to gather information from legitimate victims and witnesses.
    If you have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by HHJ Simon Oliver, which would stand up in a court of law, or before police enforcement, you will be invited to participate in a group preparing to formally challenge HHJ Oliver along with other victims in a class action.
    We were seeking at least 15 strong cases/victims, but due to the positive response may take more’’

    Apart from the fact this is not illegal or libelous, the false allegation included in the arrest application as fact, that Mr. Javed Sheikh is responsible for this online survey is ABSOLUTELY FALSE. Mr. Sheikh has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Surveyhero Simon Oliver survey. It was set up in August 2019 to gather legitimate evidence from possible victims of HHJ Oliver for the evidence database being set up for the Oliver Eight website.
    I and my colleagues are not involved or ‘collude’ in anyway with Mr.Javed, although we have naturally taken an interest with his case , as with all those that feel they have been judicially abused by HHJ Oliver.
    Neither are we involved with this Blog its moderators (we do not even know who they are) and the same goes for any other platform on this topic, apart from the Oliver Eight and the survey hero page to support the Oliver Eight with an evidence database.

    I find it startling that senior Government attorney Louisa Lloyd-Jones is making two provably false allegations in the application to have Mr. Sheikh imprisoned. If a Judge and a senior Government attorney can make two glaringly false allegations against a member of the public to have them imprisoned, how many other allegations for the request for the arrest of Mr. Sheikh are false?
    This just absolutely proves how HHJ Oliver is prepared to nefariously make absolutely false allegations and statements about members of the public in court documents without any accountability. I have seen these false allegations and will swear before an ‘honest’ Judge that this is the case and is a total abuse of power and the law. It also proves extreme bullying by a heavy government attorney and a Judge who is starting to trip over his bloated sense of immunity to the law and accountability. Bear in mind it is we the public who is funding this TOTAL ABUSE OF POWER AND CORRUPTION OF THE LAW.

    I invite the Police to contact me at;
    Penelopesinclair9@gmail.com
    Where I am happy to make a formal police statement over the phone and in writing. I will only give information to a documented senior Police officer outside of the Thames Valley police catchment area, due to probable Thames Valley police collusion with HHJ Oliver.

    I also invite; Press, Government officials or pro bono human rights attorneys or similar to contact me at the same email address
    Penelopesinclair9@gmail.com

    Where I will give them evidence that Louisa Lloyd Jones of the UK Government legal department and HHJ Simon Oliver have made totally false allegations in an application for an innocent member of the public to be arrested and imprisoned with the sole attempt to silence that person.
    It’s time to stop this! And make Judge Simon Oliver accountable for his disgraceful behavior towards members of the public.

    Addendum

    While writing this statement this morning, I googled for some data and have found that there has already been a criminal complaint by someone who is also attempting to track down the IP address behind the Oliver eight site.

    🧇 Criminal Complaint – IPAddress.com
    http://www.ipaddress.com › search › criminal+complaint
    HHJ Simon Oliver, Home | Mysite. theolivereight.online. The Oliver Eight are requesting The Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Criminal Justice and Victims, ..
    And

    Criminal Complaint
    We have found the following websites that are related to Criminal Complaint.
    Websites

    • HHJ Simon Oliver, Home | Mysite
    theolivereight.online
    The Oliver Eight are requesting The Minister of State for Policing, Fire and Criminal Justice and Victims, to accept a cl*** action criminal complaint, leading to a legitimate and transparent investigation into grave, habitual misconduct, perversion of the course of justice and possible Judicial……………..’’

    I would like to know what the basis of such a criminal complaint is, who is behind that complaint and that person/s email me immediately at;
    penelopesinclair9@gmail.com

    It interesting to note the other sites being named in a criminal complaint alongside the Oliver eight;

    ‘’pro-seblog.com
    Empowering Ordinary People to Represent Themselves in Court Effectively’’
    And
    • Home | whistleblower, complaint, corruption, fraud, racism, theft
    tip-offs.com
    Whistle-blower, whistle blower, whistleblowing, fraud, corruption, theft, bribery, crime, criminal, tender fraud, crime, criminal, misconduct, dishonesty, ethics, risk…….”

    Which can only drive us to ask even more questions. Who are criminalizing those that seek to expose criminality?

    I suggest others (including the moderators of this blog) who have made websites or similar for which Mr. Sheikh is being blamed and threatened with imprisonment, do the right thing; step up and make your voice heard and available to Police to prove Mr. Sheikh should not be sent to jail for websites, blogs and events out of his control. It would be a total miscarriage not only of justice, but morality, if Mr. Sheikh is made a scapegoat for so many Oliver victims seeking help.

    Sincerely
    Penelope Sinclair
    Fiat justitia ruat caelum

    p.s. I do need to also state here that the Olivereight website and the HHJ Oliver Surveyhero questionnaire page have NOTHING to do with a blog which has plagiarized content from the OliverEight site and placed it here;

    https://misconductinpublicoffice.weebly.com/behaving-badly-blog/judge-simon-oliver-class-action-13-victims
    (Whoever did this, know it is NOT helpful and we are not in any way associated with them or this judges behaving badly blog.)

  68. Dear Penelope and Mr Sheikh
    Thank you very much for your comment above. We can also confirm that Mr Sheikh is not responsible for this blog either. Our material is gathered from several reliable sources which is evident from the comments here. Mr Sheikh has had no contribution to this site or has been involved in it in any way whatsoever. If ‘worshipful master’ Louisa Lloyd Jones or the Government Legal Services have a problem, please contact us directly on this blog and we will respond to you. If the police or any other government department wants to contact us, please comment and we will respond to you directly.
    NOTICE TO SIMON OLIVER: WE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO DO IT. EVERYTIME YOU MISBEHAVE, WE WILL CREATE ADDITIONAL BLOGS AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO THAT UNTIL YOU STOP VICTIMISING INNOCENT PEOPLE. YOUR TIME IS UP AND IT’S TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO STAND UP AGAINST YOU. EVEN YOUR FREEMASON LODGE DESPISE YOU AND NOW WANT YOU OUT.
    CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED.
    From the team at judges behaving badly

  71. Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Mr. Sheikh has posted to me (Leonard Lawrence) all papers sent to him by barrister
    Louisa Lloyd-Jones Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team
    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department
    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL

    HM Procurator General, with respect, the Treasury Solicitor omitted to inform me of
    the false allegations made against me by Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon
    Jonathan OLIVER, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684 Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG41 5EA.

    Upon receipt from barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones of the specific allegations Worshipful
    Master His Honour Judge Simon Jonathan OLIVER has made against me, the alligations
    will be investigated, addressed and defended.

    To assist barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones:
    a) [Posted by “len lawrence” at 10.30pm on 5 February 2018]
    b) [posted by “len lawrence” at 10.49pm on 10 February 2018]
    c) I understand that allegations have also been raised regarding my, and one others, mental
    health.

    HM Procurator General, I have disclosed to the former Attorney General the Rt Hon Geoffery
    Cox QC MP, documents that detectives from two police forces that visited me have identified
    as too sensitive for them to view. They are.

    Police files are marked: Disclosure of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited.
    Our focus is on an Assistance Chief Constable within Thames Valley Police.

    HM Procurator General, barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones is not the lawyer driving this litigation
    by Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon. Louisa Lloyd-Jones is instructed by more
    senior lawyers who’s names can, if necessary, be identified.

    HM Procurator General, it appears that it is not the Government Legal Department that is
    driving this litigation against Mr. Javed Sheikh, it is the Ministry of Justice.

    HM Procurator General, would you enquire with the Permanent Secretary at the Ministry
    of Justice, Sir Richard Heaton, who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the litigation
    against Mr. Javed Sheikh, to whom I will then forward the evidence disproving the allegations
    Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon Jonathan OLIVER has made against me,

    HM Procurator General,
    I alone will take sole responsibility for this website, rather than Mr. Javed Sheikh. The
    website I believe was set up to protect myself and other victims from Worshipful Master
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    One of Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, victims contacted me this week
    in tears. Not only had Worshipful Master Simon Oliver taken her home, but he also took her
    two children from her.

    HM Procurator General, you may wish to inform Worshipful Master His Honour Judge
    Simon Oliver that the mother had worked for the Metropolitan Police in covert operations
    on child protection, reporting directly to a Chief Superintendent and Commander! Others
    victims like myself have Armed Forces backgrounds or associations.

    HM Procurator General, FREEMASONS! Respect, Integrity, Friendship and Charity.
    Worshipful Master His Honour Judge Simon Oliver may have informed you that I also
    was a London Freemason for 30 years. I was initiated into Freemasonry by Detectives
    from The Obscene Publications Branch, Metropolitan Police Service. The Masonic Lodge
    no longer functions, following the resignations of members over what HHJ Simon Oliver
    has done to me and others on this website.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  72. Criminal justice system failing disabled defendants, EHRC warns

    Report for England and Wales says move towards remote hearings may worsen situation

    In a report, called Inclusive Justice, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) calls for better treatment for those with learning disabilities, autism and brain injuries who have to go to court.

    The complexity of the criminal justice system and its specialist language presents a particular problem for disabled defendants and puts them at risk of not being able to participate effectively in the legal process, the report says.

    SEE https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/jun/11/criminal-justice-system-failing-disabled-defendants-ehrc-warns

  73. Len,

    This would be an ideal way to end any communication with Government / Court Communications such as:-

    In Argus Panoptes. Instead of yours sincerely or faithfully.

    I have deliberately left out the end of ….

    I bet you they would place those two words in the computer post-haste to establish their meaning, and get
    the biggest shock of their lives!

    ‘Brave colleagues indeed’

  74. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Below is the post-WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has falsely accused me of placing on
    the judges behaving badly website, in his sworn statement against Mr Javed Sheikh:

    [posted by len lawrence at 10:49pm on the 10 February 2018]
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE.
    IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT.
    I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!

    ————————————————————————
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    It took less than 24 hours to identify who made the above post, together with the correct
    date and time of posting. The person posting as ‘Fuck oliver’ would be known to WBr Simon
    Oliver, as well as Thames Valley Police. WBro HHJ Simon Oliver had removed a female teenager
    from the family. The actual post can be viewed below:

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE.
    I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM
    THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!
    ———————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    I will bow address the second false allegation the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry,
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, has made against me.

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  75. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Below is the ‘second’ post-WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has falsely accused me of
    placing on the judges behaving badly website, in his sworn statement against Mr Javed Sheikh:

    [posted by len lawrence at 10:49pm on 5 February 2018]
    ; “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”
    ————————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Again it took less than 24 hours to identify who made the above post, together with the correct
    date and time of posting. The posting was made by the following: THE WEBSITE HIS HONOUR
    JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT. Please see below:

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT says:
    February 6, 2018 at 1:40 am
    Maybe we should all go outside his house on [redacted] and protest there so all his neighbours
    know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too.
    —————————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Before I address the third allegation made against me by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire
    Freemasonry, WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, let us identify who is posting on this
    website as ‘Fuck oliver ‘

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  76. David Staples on Freemasonry:

    “That reminds us that we are being watched by something greater than ourselves and that, at some point at the end of our lives, we have to account for how we have behaved and what we’ve done during our lives to something greater than us.”

    God sees everything and he sees some rotten apples that need to be removed from Britain’s legal system, and be put in the dock at the Old Bailey.

    Oliver, you are a fool to persist in persecuting Mr. Sheikh and Mr. Lawrence. You are about to blow the whole of the justice system right out of the water.

    You know not who you are dealing with.

    Expect us.

  77. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr Javed Sheikh

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    I apologise for using the term ‘Fuck oliver says’ but who is ‘Fuck oliver says’ ?

    Again it took less than 24 hours. The identity of ‘Fuck oliver says’ has been traced, including
    his address and a photo image. I will not disclose the details as I do not wish to identify the child.
    Detective Inspector Jonathan Gro…n, Thames Valley Police also knows a person that meets
    the criteria below:

    Had dealings with Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    Had dealings with Thames Valley Police
    Has a child who was removed by WBro HHJ Simon Oliver
    Cares about the child

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 21, 2018 at 5:06 pm
    This peice of shit has taken our daughter with no good reason. We are not scared of standing
    up to this so called democracy. Tvp are corrupt, Oliver is corrupt. WHY ARE WE STANDING
    BACK AND LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT?our daughter is about to turn 15 ,yet 6 months
    ago this monster removed her. Why not remove her 16 year old sister if we are bad parents?
    We work 24 7 and because of our NON engagement she was taken up north. 4 x hospital
    admissions with self harm and suicidal thoughts, our daughter. WE ARE NOT SCARED!
    This is the tip of the iceberg in regards to our daughter. WE MUST FIGHT!

    Like

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    I
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS
    SCUM BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE.
    I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO EXPOSE HIM
    THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!

    Like

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 9, 2019 at 6:28 pm

    I’VE JUST WITNESSED G4S AT THE FAMILY COURT IN READING AT APROX 15.00
    DELIVERING A BOX OF MONEY! THIS LUMP OF SHIT HAS REMOVED OUR DAUGHTER
    FOR NO REASON WHO IS NOW SUFFERING MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS, SHE IS 16.O

    Like
    ———————————————————————–
    Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General.

    Could Gilad Segal, Sandy Ferguson or Ms Louisa Lloyd-Jones Senior Lawyer | Ministry of
    Justice, Costs and Inquests Team Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group|
    Government Legal Department 102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL kindly
    forward to me the allegations that the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, His
    Honour Judge Simon Oliver has made regarding my mental health.

    Upon receipt of WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver psychological diagnosis of myself
    I will forward the diagnosis to the Ministry of Defence for others for assessment.

    Yours respectfully,

    In Argus Panoptes,

    Leonard Lawrence

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    (Deputy Chief Constable, Bedfordshire, Police Rtd)

  78. To: Sir Jonathan Jones, HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor.
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    WHY HAS WORSHIPFUL BROTHER, HIS HONOUR JUDGE, SIMON OLIVER, FAILED TO COMPY WITH
    THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO HIM BY THE NOW FORMER SENIOR HIGH COURT LIAISON JUDGE
    FOR THE THAMES VALLEY AREA, MRS JUSTICE ANNA PAUFFLEY, HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION?

    WORSHIPFUL BROTHER SIMON OLIVER CAN TELL YOU. IF NOT, I WILL.

    From: Oliver HHJudge

    Sent: 11 February 2013 15:21

    To: Horton, Chris C

    The papers in Lawrence need to go to Ms Bancroft-Rimmer in the Ct of Appeal (she is a Deputy master).

    However before they get there, I need to see the order I made, please, to see I f it needs to be amended
    in any way.

    I will also need to make an order retransferring it to CA.

    Many thanks

    SO

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver

    DFJ Reading County Court

    160-163 Friar Street,

    Reading, Berkshire RG1 1HE

    Tel0118-987-0500

    email:HHJudge.Oliver@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk

    DX 98010 Reading 6

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  79. Social media challenges the Crown’s legitimacy by broadcasting its injustice

    Social media is now challenging the Crown’s legitimacy. Social media reveals that Crown has been complicit. In these scandals it has been shown to lack justice, to abuse power, and to flout the law. The Crown has ruled by law but it has not accepted the rule of law. Social media has shown that the Crown has usurped the people’s power, popular sovereignty. The Crown’s title to rule is no longer valid. To shore up of its legitimacy, to burnish its valid title to rule, the Crown has sought to address the long running, deep seated, injustices within its system. In particular, the following investigations which challenge the Crown’s legitimacy and the legitimacy of its bodies would not have happened without social media.

    The Hillsborough Inquiry.
    The Goddard Inquiry into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse
    The Daniel Morgan Murder Independent Panel
    The Pitchford Inquiry in to Undercover Policing (SpyCops)

    Instead of lancing the boil of popular discontent, the inquiries have shown the full scale, scope and depth of the Crown’s corruption. Instead of shoring up the Crown’s legitimacy, the inquiries, panels, and inquests have eroded it further. The outcomes have shown the Crown, its institutions, and its agents have had scant regard for the public good, the rule of law, or justice. They have shown the British public that the Monarchy is an outdated institution. Why should someone in the 21st century obey an unelected person whose claim to rule is based on a 13th century standard?

    FULL ARTICLE HERE: https://lawrenceserewicz.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/social-medias-corrosive-effect-on-uk-monarchys-legitimacy/

  80. “Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal. – Martin Luther King, Jr.

  84. https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2019-05-16.HL15807.h&s=home+office+criminals#gHL15807.q0

    Lord Marlesford Conservative

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 14 May (HL15405), whether they will name the three Home Office officials who were convicted in open court of criminal offences in connection with their official duties.

    Tweet Share
    Hansard source
    (Citation: HL Deb, 31 May 2019, cW)

    They refuse to name them – not doubt for feat of class action law suits.

    I believe 50 were arrested altogether.

    Organised crime has infiltrated every public department, along with police, and the legal system. The Met has known about this for well over 20 years. It may explain why justice is rarely seen to be done these days.

  85. To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether any Home Office staff have been convicted of criminal offences since 9 April 2018; and if so, in each case, what was the (1) nature of the offence, (2) date of conviction, and (3) sentence received.

    Hansard source
    (Citation: HL Deb, 14 May 2019, cW)

    Photo of Baroness Williams of Trafford Baroness Williams of Trafford The Minister of State, Home Department, Minister for Equalities (Department for International Development)

    Answer here: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2019-04-29.HL15405.h&s=home+office+criminals#gHL15405.q0

  86. From ARGUS

    I hope you don’t mind me sending this message, it is important. This interview link
    with Len Lawrence a friend and colleague, also former Royal Navy and Government
    Service like myself, by Investigative Journalist Caroline, and a very good one too, tells
    the abusive manner in which he was treated by the Courts after being deliberately over
    medicated to feign a mental illness. Then totally asset stripped.

    After much investigation, even obstructions were used, to put us off prying deeper,
    even learned Judges and Barristers were not excluded. Judges were not even permitted
    or authorised to hear Len’s case, cases! Let alone make decisions upon the outcome.

    Len was deemed an extremely vulnerable person and subject to the Court of Protection.
    This means only a nominated Court of Protection Judge was allowed to hear the case.

    Len does himself justice in this interview, to stop what occurred to him being done to
    others. He explains what happened to him and how the Government and Legal system
    fleeced him and so many more veterans and individuals, taking every penny from them,
    also their homes to place all in the Government and lawyers pocket!

    It runs for approximately 15/18 minutes. This interview is really worth watching.

    Ensure this does not happen to you nor any family member(s).
    Best wishes,
    Semper Occultus (NI)

    Seeking the Truth, about The Court of Protection. – YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Jg1M2AQ_I
    Mar 1, 2019 – Len Lawrence with Caroline Stephens, Seeking the Truth, about The Court of Protection.

  87. Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C.
    Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC
    Lucy Frase QC

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C. was not the only Attorney General to have afforded me
    assistance, another Attorney General the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC. former
    Chairman, Intelligence and Security Committee had also afforded me assistance.

    However, Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC has still to have sight of the disrespectful
    entry made on the Thames Valley Police computer, following his request to
    Thames Valley Police to investigate the theft of documents from me.

    Lucy Frase QC former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice and later
    Solicitor General for England and Wales, now Minister of State for Prisons. I have
    on file communications from Lucy Frase QC Head of Office. If I require assistance
    from Lucy Frase QC I was to ask.

    Surprisingly, the police force that has afforded me the most assistance, and at times
    safeguarding, has been the Metropolitan Police Service.

    Rt Hon Geoffery Cox Q.C. with assistance from the Crown Prosecution Service and
    Ministry of Justice has provided me with the legislation needed to set aside all the
    judgements in my case, without the need to appeal.

    At this present time, I am still awaiting confirmation from the Chief Constable and
    Deputy Chief Constable, Thames Valley Police, whether the Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificate, that I posted to them in August 2019 is authentic or fake.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps
    Who has been protecting the solicitor below? Solicitor Graeme Fraser held the first
    Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, issued to protect me but denied it’s existence
    in a letter to District Judge Jones at Slough County Court.

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, father was a senior partner of OGR Stock Denton LLP
    and chair of the Law Society’s legal aid committee. Many of Graeme Stephen FRASER
    family members have been solicitors, barristers and judges.

  88. Siobhan Baillie MP Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Ministry of Justice

    Siobhan Baillie MP notes place solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, SRA ID: 8844 SRA
    [now Head of Family Department, OGR Stock Denton LLP 2nd Floor, Winston House,
    2 Dollis Park, Finchley, London N3 1HF] at the hearing on the 18 August 2005 before
    HHJ Charles Elly, at Reading County Court.

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER was informed by barrister Simon Calhaem, instructed
    by Government Legal Services, that Laurence Oates, Office Solicitor to the Supreme
    Courts had not agreed on the sale value of my then home.

    Days later solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER had sealed a FINAL ORDER falsy alleging
    that Laurence Oates Office Solicitor to the Supreme Courts had not agreed on the sale
    value of my then home.

    Luke 8.17
    “For there is nothing hidden that will not become public, nothing under cover that will
    not be made known and brought out into the open”.

    Copies of Siobhan Baillie’s notes were found following a search at Reading County Court,
    they had been available to WBro HHJ Simon Oliver prior to the hearing on the 16 April 2012.

    Leonard Lawrence

    Solicitor Graeme Stephen FRASER, father was a senior partner of OGR Stock Denton LLP
    and chair of the Law Society’s legal aid committee. Many of Graeme Stephen FRASER
    family members have been solicitors, barristers and judges.

  89. Dr. Vanessa Davies,
    Director-General, Bar Standards Board

    We do not have any powers to make Mr. Brazil, Mr. Allen answer your queries.
    The current Official Solicitor (Mr. Pitblado) wrote to the Bar Standards Board on 24 June 2009.

    In his letter he explained that the point had not been reached at which the Court of Protection
    should have been notified of the existence of the CP3.

    As the Bar Standards Board was entitled to do, we took views of the Official Solicitor Mr. Pitblado.

    ‘The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents’.

    24 August 2011 Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection;
    Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

    Dr. Vanessa Davies,
    Director-General, Bar Standards Board

    ———————————————————————

    THE NAMES OF THOSE THAT PARTICIPATED IN THE BARS STANDARDS BOARD, COMPLAINTS
    COMMITTEE, WHITEWASHING OF MY ABUSE HAS BEEN RECOVER FOR ME.

    ONE OF THE BARRISTERS THAT I COMPLAINED ABOUT WAS RECORDER NICHOLAS ALLEN QC.

    THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD OMITTED TO ADVISED ME THAT NICHOLAS ALLEN HAD BEEN
    A MEMBER OF THE COMPLAINS COMMITTE OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD.

    SOME MEMBERS OF THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD, COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE, DID NOT
    PARTICIPATE IN THE WHITEWASHING INCLUDING:

    SUE CARR QC

    NOW

    The Right Honourable Lady Justice Carr, a Lady Justice of Appeal

  91. Anonymous says:
    June 14, 2020 at 11:56 pm

    Dear Anonymous,

    Thames Valley Police appear reluctant to advise me who was Head of Thames Valley Police,
    Professional Standards Department, in 2015 and 2016. I have had to submit a Freedom of
    Information request.

    I believe that Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice, Tim De Meyer
    was the Head of Professional Standards Department in 2015 and 2016.

    Special proceeds were put into place to deal with my case, in 2015/2016 following another
    Police Force identifying offences of Fraud, Perjury and other more serious offences against
    me.

    Also, an internal Thames Valley Police review in 2015/16 identified that Thames Valley
    Police CID Reading, knew that BP Collins Solicitors held, but had failed to disclose a Part V11
    Medical Report, making me a patient subject to the Court of Protection.

    Did the now- Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police, know of the 2015/16
    CID review? He has certainly known since August 2019 of the Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificate dated 27 January 2005 that was issued by Dr Royds without a medical. He holds a
    copy of it.

    Leonard Lawrence

  92. Hi, Mark Anthony Taylor here, of http://www.shyreman.com.

    I can confirm your Lord Chief Justice, Sir Ian Burnett is as bent as they come – he covered up serious bank frauds, including those of Deutsche Bank rigging the Comex market.

    This was alleged by me in B40BM021 in June 2015 in the Birmingham Mercantile Court. The claim was dismissed and closed with a restraining order by now disgraced former judge Simon Staley Brown QC.

    You can see for yourself DB were rigging markets. They settled out of court for $100 million in New York and were forced to pay a $30 million fine in 2018: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7682-18.

    But in the UK the exposure was ultimately sabotaged by none other than Burnett.

    http://www.shyreman.com/docs/burnett/appeal.decision.2.pdf

    JP Morgan, Barclays, HSBC, UBS and RBS all piggy backed on Deutsche Bank’s defence, which turned out to be total bullshit:

    http://www.shyreman.com/docs/appeal.bundle/1-2.Defendant.Witness.Statement.pdf

    Burnett has proven himself to be a fool and a liar. He is in no position to sue me for libel. The ICO confirmed he had no transcript of hearing when he closed an application for appeal that stated over 20 points of misconduct against Simon Brown QC : http://www.shyreman.com/docs/appeal.bundle/grounds.for.appeal.2.0.pdf

    Brown was the butt of three sets of appeal judges, who all found him guilty of gross misconduct. He was termed the ‘copy and paste’ judge by the Daily Mail. i.e copying a corrupt claimants document and then pasting into his judgement. Judgement thus scripted by the plaintiff. In my case I was the plaintiff, and I got hit for a restraining order on the grounds of ‘demanding the attendance of the applicant of the oral hearing against me.’ Does that make sense? Of course not.

    I have proof on my website that Deutsche Bank rigged its audits. The evidence was sent to the FCA and the SFO and they both stonewalled it.

  93. Len, both of us know what they did, and we named the same named. Paul Kernaghan was in a position to understand misconduct done to us both. He did nothing as usual. JACO is a joke. (JOKEO?).

    We also know the Lord Chief Justices sat by and watched you get shafted with all the evidence before them. Constrast with Adrian PIE Fulford, wasn’t it Baron Thomas who gave him a letter of recommendation. Which LCJ was it who gave Bishop Peter Ball a letter of recommendation. Was it Thomas again?

  95. The Abstraction says:
    June 15, 2020 at 8:06 pm

    Dear The Abstraction,

    The association between The Lernaean Hydra and Medusa

    The Abstraction had a very high-security clearance, serving Government, like Tom and
    others. Look what they did to you and others !!

    Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge
    I was puzzled why Sir John Brigstocke, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,
    in his report to the Secretary of State for Justice and the Lord Chief Justice omitted to inform
    both of the existence of Court of Protection Medical Certificates of Mental Incapacity CP3’s
    that had never been disclosed to the Court of Protection by District Judges at Slough County
    Court, all of whom did not hold a Court of Protection a nomination. For 18 months I had
    been incapable of legal discussion and understanding, according to the former Chambers of
    Mr. Justice Stephen Cobb and Mr. Justice Nicholas Francis.

    It is now known that Nick Rose, Investigating Officer, Judicial Appointments and Conduct,
    Ombudsman made no reference in his report to Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge and the Secretary
    of State of Justice that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection, and what had occurred
    to me at Slough and Reading County Court.

    Paul Kernaghan, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman [JACO]
    When it became known that Nick Rose, Investigating Officer, Judicial Appointments and Conduct,
    Ombudsman had not disclosed my protected status in the report he prepared for the Lord Chief
    Justice Igor Judge and the Secretary of State of Justice, both John Critchfield, Head of Office
    Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman’s Office and Paul Kernaghan, Judicial
    Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman refused to inform the Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge
    and the Secretary of State of Justice of the omissions.

    Paul Kernaghan,
    Some history:
    Mr. Kernaghan was appointed Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary on 21st September 1999
    His police career culminated in a nine-year tenure as Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary.
    There is a letter headed Hampshire Constabulary Paul Kernaghan, Chief Constable, dated 06
    February 2002 MIC/Det. Supt/JJ/DM ‘Gosport Memorial Hospital’

    ‘Gosport Memorial Hospital’
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/gosport-hospital-scandal-deaths-jane-barton-opiate-painkiller-a8887651.html

    Apr 29, 2019 – Families who lost loved ones at Gosport Memorial Hospital.
    After a 20 year fight and 11 failed investigations, the Gosport Independent Panel revealed that as
    many as 650 patients were killed with medically unnecessary doses of opiate painkillers.

    “Since September 2018 a team led by Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing, representing the
    Eastern Policing Region, has been carrying out an independent assessment of the findings of
    the Gosport Independent Panel.

    Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing,
    Nick Downing was Detective Chief Superintendent Nick Downing, Metropolitan Police Service,
    I will always be grateful for his guidance and assistance! A GOOD COP.

    Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford
    In February 2013 when Mrs. Justice Pauffley instructed HHJ Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case
    to the Civil Court of Appeal, Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford upheld a judgment by
    Master Basil Yoxall not to disclose my files and Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, to the
    Court of Protection and Court of Appeal.

    The files that Mr. Justice (now Lord Justice) Adrian Fulford held were later placed on my living
    room table by an unknown source, including the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates.

    http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2014/03_04/2014_03_08_Martin_Mail_High_Court.htm

    Mar 8, 2014 – Lord Justice Fulford was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile … and state
    ‘Adrian’ would ‘ask Patricia Hewitt about the possibilities of.

    Joshua Rozenberg ‘The report exonerating Lord Justice Fulford should be published’
    It is no surprise that claims linking the judge to paedophile campaigners were dismissed,
    but why not tell us the reason?

    Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, former lord chief justice of Northern Ireland.

    Having conducted a challenging and interrogative inquiry, Lord Kerr concluded that the
    allegation that Sir Adrian had been a supporter of the PIE was without substance. On the
    evidence that had been presented and on the basis of the interviews which he had conducted,
    Lord Kerr concluded that Sir Adrian was not and had never been a supporter of PIE or its aims.
    Further there was no reason for Sir Adrian to have disclosed his association with the NCCL
    on appointment to judicial office.
    ———————————————
    TO REFRESH MEMORIES START WITH THE INTERCEPTION BY CUSTOMS AND EXCISE OF
    MAGAZINES SENT FROM AMSTERDAM. THE RAID BY WEST MERCIA POLICE ON THE HOME
    OF PETER RIGHTON. THE P.I.E. LIST RECOVERED AND TAKEN TO SCOTLAND YARD. CHARLES
    NAPIER THE ONE TIME TREASURE OF P.I.E. ALSO DR MORRIS FRASER. THE PROMINENT CHILD
    PSYCHIATRIST AND PIE [Paedophile Information Exchange] FOUNDER MEMBER WHO THE
    GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL ALLOWED TO WORK AT UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL LONDON.

    Peter Righton – Islington Survivors Network
    islingtonsurvivors.co.uk › peter-righton
    Peter Righton was a social worker and academic who in 1992 was fined £900 for possession
    of abusive images of children. He was a member of the .

  96. Len,

    The long awaited, Coup de grâce I suspect – although it could also be termed a Coup de théâtre too

  99. To: Len Lawrence
    Subject: Paul Kernaghan, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman

    Paul Kernaghan the man with a QPM and CBE.

    Len if you notice that this chap Kernaghan holds the QPM the Queens Police Medal.
    I suggest he remembers he is not a Police Officer any longer, and be a little more careful in his
    abrupt response. I expect it be fine if serving still, as that is the manner many arsehole senior
    officers spoke to and replied to their officers.

    It shows the contempt they display to the public.

    Utter non-respect.

    All the best Len

  102. HAHA -so funny! In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.

  103. Len, I see from Gilad Segal’s letter that the government legal group is “positive about disabled people”. Isn’t that phrase inherently discriminatory? It implies that it is questionable as to whether people should be positive about disabled people or not. Does it really need to be stated? It’s a bit of a backhander if you ask me.

    You should sue them too.

  104. If Len wanted to sue the government legal department. He will need taxpayers money to fund the case. I guess he will need to contact the ministry of justice then who would be more than happy to use the back door to get some taxpayers money for private litigation

  105. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    C/O Louisa.Lloyd-Jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Anonymous says:
    June 17, 2020 at 2:42 am

    Dear HM Procurator General and Anonymous,

    Regarding the sentence below:
    I see from Gilad Segal’s letter that the government legal group is “positive about disabled people”

    Matthew Coats was very “positive about disabled people” and extremely kind and helpful to me.

    Matthew Coats has held senior positions at the Ministry of Justice:
    Matthew Coats, Director-General for EU Exit Implementation,
    Matthew Coats, Ministry of Justice, Chief Operating Officer
    Matthew Coats, Director-General of the Legal Aid Agency & Corporate Services Group

    However, others are not “positive about disabled people”

    Around 2007 the Legal Services Commission awarded me a Legal Aid Certificate to seek damages
    against the Legal Services Commission for around £13,000. St John’s Chambers, 101 Victoria Street
    Bristol, BS1 6PU had my Legal Aid Certificate discharged, without ever obtaining my case files
    from the office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts. (files obtained in March 2012).

    The Legal Services Commission, Customer Redress Committee, headed by Commissioner Beryl
    Seaman CBE JP, falsely alleged that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge that I had
    been a patient subject to the Court of Protection, when my signature was gained on legal forms
    by solicitor Sarah Bridgett BENFIELD (now a solicitor based at Clifton Ingram’s Reading), without
    the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    Records now obtained show that solicitor Sarah Bridgett BENFIELD was receiving instructions from
    solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor, so as to avoid an application to the Court
    of Protection.

    A sworn affidavit was filed at Aylesbury County Court by the Legal Services Commission, falsely
    alleging that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge of my former mental incapacity.

    Solicitor Dina Rawal had prepared a report for Commissioner Beryl Seaman CBE JP, Head of the
    Legal Services Commission, Customer Redress Committee, identifying that I had been subject to
    the Court of Protection. Thereafter, Dina Rawal in a sworn affidavit to Aylesbury Court Court,
    falsely alleged that the Legal Services Commission had no knowledge of my former mental
    incapacity.

    Solicitor Dina Rawal made two unsuccessful attempts at Aylesbury County Court to have me
    Sectioned under the Mental Health Act 1983. Both attempts were stopped, once by District
    Judge Brooks and once by District Judge Moystn.

    Around the 1st August 2008, now as a litigant in person, my case came before District Judge Robin
    Chaudhuri, sitting at Milton Keynes County Court
    Present was;
    Barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal 33 Bedford Row Chambers (Instructed by Legal Services Commission)
    Solicitor Silas Peter Sebastian CATLING Legal Services Commission
    Solicitor Dina Rawal Legal Services Commission

    The Hearing

    a) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri, inquired could the Legal service Commission not settle this claim.

    b) Silas Catling LSC Solicitor responded that he was told to fight the case by powers above. Ruth Wayte,
    Legal Director, Legal Service Commission.

    c) Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal 33 Bedford Row Chambers London WC1R 4JH
    Skeleton argument alleged funding was lawfully granted.

    (Leonard Lawrence signature was obtained on Public Funding Forms after he was Certified under Part
    V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and subject to the Court of Protection. CLSMEANS1 identifying Leonard
    Lawrence was £331,000 over the eligibility limit for public funding.

    d) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri strikes out my claim.

    e) Only after the Hearing did barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S. Otwal and Mr. Silas Catling then allowed me,
    Leonard. Lawrence, to photocopy the document below:

    The Legal Service Commission Manual Volume 2, Part F pages 198 to 303.

    f) Neither Mukhtiar Otwal (Barrister), Silas Catling (Solicitor) and Dina Rawal (Solicitor) disclosed this
    information to District Judge Robin Chaudhuri or to me, Leonard Lawrence, prior to, or during the
    hearing on the 1 August 2008.

    g) 18 September 2008 Jonathan Flewers, Legal Service Commission, Corporate Legal Team, stated in
    S/IC/FOI(19) Log No 1018
    “The position is that the LSC cannot lawfully grant funding to an individual if they are not financially
    eligible.

    Leonard Lawrence was not eligible by some £331,000

    h) Access Data Request to the Legal Service Commission, Corporate Legal Team.
    Response: Not in the Public Interest to release part of Mr. Lawrence Public Funding file.

    i) Matthew Coats, the now-former Ministry of Justice, Chief Operating Officer.
    Matthew Coats has released to me, Leonard Lawrence, all documents that the Legal Service
    Commission, Corporate Legal Team, identified as: ‘Not in the Public Interest to release’.

    j) District Judge Robin Chaudhuri said on the 1 August 2008 that he had routinely seen hundreds
    of Court of Protection patients signatures obtained on Legal Aid Forms, without the knowledge
    of the Court of Protection, when the patients like myself were Hundred of Thousands of pounds
    over the Legal Aid Limit! Strange, but District Judge Robin Chaudhuri was not a Court of Protection
    judge at that time!

    WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

    District Judge Robin Chaudhuri is now sitting at Peterborough Combined Court. He is now a
    Court of Protection Judge !!

    Solicitor Silas Peter Sebastian CATLING is now a Legal Ombudsmen

    Solicitor Dina Rawal is now Senior Case Manager, The Legal Aid Agency, Ministry of Justice

    Barrister Mr. Mukhtiar S Otwal is now at 42 Bedford Row Chambers London WC1R

    Ruth Wayte, Director of Legal Aid Casework and a member of the Executive Team and the Legal
    Aid Agency Board.
    ————————————————————————-

    FINALLY, TO QUOTE GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT

    “THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ALWAYS GETS PUBLIC FUNDING”

    “NO NEED TO GO TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION”

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  106. “has released to me, Leonard Lawrence, all documents that the Legal Service
    Commission, Corporate Legal Team, identified as: ‘Not in the Public Interest to release’.”

    Do they mean that it is not in the government’s interest to let the public know about the corruption? Is that what this means?

    TO QUOTE GOVERNMENT LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT

    “THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ALWAYS GETS PUBLIC FUNDING”

    “NO NEED TO GO TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION”

    So the reason why Helen Mary Clift and her friends in the private sector draw in business into the Official Solicitor’s Office, thereby denying vulnerable people the protection of the Court of Protection is so that they can operate a complex criminal racket to steal public funds and put them into the hands of private solicitors.

    They are defrauding the government, and therefore the taxpayer.

    How evil is that? I wonder how many cases they have done this on – taking legal aid and giving it freely to their friends?

    Len’s case is FULLY DOCUMENTED. You can run, Helen Clift et al , but you can’t hide now.

  107. Louisa.Lloyd-Jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Anonymous says:
    June 17, 2020 at 10:05 pm

    Dear Anonymous,

    What solicitor Government Legal Services solicitor Helen Mary Clift, office of the Offical Solicitor,
    and her friends in the private sector have still to learn is the contents of an internal police review
    of my case. The findings of this police review had been denied to me by Detective Inspector,
    Gavin Tyrrell, Thames Valley Police in 2016.

    I will arrange to post a copy of the internal Thames Valley Police review of my case on this website.

    However, documents obtained from two other sources suggests Detective Inspector, Gavin Tyrrell,
    Thames Valley Police was being bullied by more senior police officers within Thames Valley Police,
    including the now-former Detective Superintendent Gillian (Gill) Wootton, former Head of Specialist
    Operations and Covert Policing.

    Regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    Detective Inspector, Gavin Tyrrell is now Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell, City of London
    Police.

    Economic Crime Conference 2019
    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell, City of London Police
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations, City of London Police

    Gavin Tyrrell is a police officer leading the City of London and National Lead Force Fraud
    Operations. His portfolio covers Complex Economic Crime investigations, Money Laundering,
    Bribery and Corruption, Asset Recovery as well as proactive operations.

    Gavin began his service with Thames Valley Police working largely in covert policing roles
    fighting organised crime before becoming head of economic and cybercrime in 2011.

    Transferring to the City of London Police Gavin and his teams now also support complex
    investigation across the United Kingdom to enhance local capability and service delivery.

    Experienced working across Europe, US and Africa, Gavin is the United Kingdom’ economic
    crime representative to the European Union and has influenced recent policy amendments.

  108. Len!

    Even tractors now on Autopilot GPS

    You may recall the name Josiah. He was crowned king when he was only “eight years old” (2 Kings 22:1).
    Years later, in his mid-twenties, Hilkiah the high priest found “the Book of the Law” in the temple (v. 8).

    It was then read to the young king, who tore his robes in sorrow due to his ancestors’ disobedience
    to God. Josiah set about to do what was “right in the eyes of the Lord” (v. 2). The book became a tool
    to steer the people so there would be no turning to the right or left. God’s instructions were there to
    set things straight.

    Allowing the Scriptures to guide us day by day keeps our lives in line with knowing God and His will.

    The Bible is an amazing tool that, if followed, keeps us moving straight ahead.

    By John Blase

  110. What do they mean, “no factual basis”? She forgot to list the First Amendment rights.

  111. Leonard Lawrence,

    People are looking at your LinkedIn profile

    Regional Security Officer at United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service Washington DC

    United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service Washington DC
    Is the federal law enforcement and security arm of the United States Department of State.
    Its special agents are unique in the U.S. in being both members of the Foreign Service and law enforcement
    officers.

  112. Len,
    John has put this out to all Veterans, so that it is circulated and copied around the world.

  113. Sir Andrew McFarlane, The President of the Family Division, and Head of Family Justice.

    Sir Andrew,
    I will be forwarding to you a copy of a letter posted to me by Deputy High Court Family Judge Richard
    Anelay QC, former Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk, dated 9 September 2010.

    Quote:
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that you were a patient
    and subject to the Court of Protection”.

    [District Judge Fortgang has never held a Court of Protection authorisation]

    Deputy High Court Family Judge Richard Anelay QC letter dated 9 September 2010 was available to
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, on the 16 April 2012.

    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————-
    16 April 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    “It actually says in there, We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    17 July 2012 11:59:49
    Email: James Batey, Authorised Court Officer, Court of Protection
    “HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination”

    Email from James Batey, Authorised Court Officer, Court of Protection
    Practice Note:
    Official Solicitor Laurence Oates, Master of the Court of Protection and the Senior District Judge
    at the Principal Registry of the Family Division of the High Court.
    Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983
    Only the persons listed in s94 Mental Health Act 1983 may give any approval or make any order
    required for the management of property and affairs of a patient under Part VII of that Act. These
    persons are the nominated judges of the Court of Protection (High Court judiciary of the Chancery
    and Family divisions), the Master of the Court of Protection and his nominated Officers.

    30 August 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    Handed down his judgment on Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and refuses permission to appeal
    out of time. However, HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Whilst, my former solicitors Simpson Millar LLP and Sarah Christou, Senior Operations Manager,
    Court of Protection, were of the belief that they had destroyed all of my case files by 2013 they are
    mistaken.

    An electronic court transcript of the hearing on the 16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver, at
    Reading County Court has been recovered. HHJ Simon Oliver gives his considered legal opinion
    regarding the role of the Court of Protection in the mistaken belief that as a Part V11 Family Judge
    he was authorised to conduct Court of Protection hearings.

    Also, made available to me is the transcripts and judgement handed down by a Lord Justice of
    Appeal of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Permission to Appeal Part V11 Mental Health
    Act 1983 is not required. Tens of Thousands of pounds of Legal Aid Funding had been unnecessary
    claimed by solicitors and barristers.

    September 2012
    Judge Philip Waller CBE, a nominated judge of the Court of Protection the and Senior District
    Judge of the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD), instructed: Leonard Lawrence’s
    case files in the first instance be sent to the Court of Protection and an Appeal be filed at the
    Court of Protection.

    In October 2012
    Court of Appeal Judiciary telephoned HHJ Simon Oliver, Reading County Court advising that the
    Court of Appeal did not have jurisdiction, the case had to go to a nominated Court of Protection
    judge.

    11 February 2013 15:21
    Email: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    The papers in Lawrence need to go to Bancroft-Rimmer in the Court of Appeal
    I will need to make an order retransferring it to Court of Appeal

    From: Civil Appeals – Registry [mailto:civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
    Sent: 14 August 2014 08:57
    To: ‘len lawrence’
    Subject: RE: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver:
    From: Civil Appeals – Registry [mailto:civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
    Dear Sirs,
    Your request is not possible to achieve as the file has not been forwarded to our offices as of yet.

  114. Barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN
    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive, Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN
    Email: bensilverstone@matrixlaw.co.uk

    Dear Mr. Silverstone,

    Re: Committal Proceedings by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, WBr His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver and the Ministry of Justice against Mr. Javed Sheikh

    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) Harassment proceedings brought by a Circuit Judge relating
    to online publications.

    Mr. Silverstone,
    It would have been helpful had you, Matrix Chambers and Government Legal Department informed
    me of the false allegations made against me by WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver in his statement
    to the Queens Bench Division, prior to submitting the statement to The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian
    Knowles, who practiced at Matrix Chambers, prior to his appointment as a Justice of the High Court
    in October 2017.

    Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3389 (QB)
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
    Case No: QB/2019/000194 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
    Date:10/12/2019
    Before: MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES
    Between : HIS HON OUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Defendant
    Ben Silverstone (instructed by GLD) for the Claimant
    The Defendant appeared in person
    Hearing dates: 29 November 2019

    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES
    Approved Judgment

    52. In early February 2018 there were a series of messages suggesting a protest about the Claimant
    outside the Ministry of Justice. Then, on 6 February 2018 someone posted this message; “Maybe
    we should all go outside his house on [redacted] and protest there so all his neighbours know what
    hes doing and to be warned from him too.”

    53. This was followed on 20 February 2018 by a post part of which read: “OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY
    GRITTY, WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM BAGS HOME ! …”

    —————————————————————
    Mr. Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, and Government Legal Department, had you informed me of the
    false allegations made against me by WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver in his statement to the
    Queens Bench Division, prior to submitting the statement to The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian
    Knowles, I could have neutralized the false allegations.

    In WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver statement to the Queen’s Bench Division, HHJ Simon Oliver
    falsely accused me (Leonard Lawrence) of making the statements referred to in MR JUSTICE JULIAN
    KNOWLES Approved Judgment at points 52. and 53. See below:

    Point 52
    [posted by len lawrence at 10:30pm on 5 February 2018];
    “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”

    THE WEBSITE INDENTIFIES THAT THE POSTING WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY THE FOLLOWING:

    ‘HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER-EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT’
    February 6, 2018 at 1:40am
    “Maybe we should all go outside his house on [my address is then specified] and protest
    there so all his neighbours know what hes been doing and to be warned from him too”

    Point 53
    [posted by “len lawrence” at 10.49 on 10 February 2018]
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM
    BAGS HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL
    WANT TO EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL
    FAMILY!”

    THE WEBSITE INDENTIFIES THAT THE POSTING WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY THE FOLLOWING:

    Fuck oliver says:
    February 20, 2018 at 7:29 pm
    OK LET’S GET TO THE NITTY GRITTY. WHO HAS GOT THE BALLS TO PROTEST AT THIS SCUM BAGS
    HOME! WELL I HAVE. I HAVE NO FEAR OF PUTTING MY NUMBER ON HERE. IF WE ALL WANT TO
    EXPOSE HIM THEN GREAT. I’M, WE ARE NOT JUNKIES OR ALCOHOLICS JUST NORMAL FAMILY!”

    THERE ARE FURTHER POSTINGS ON THE WEBSITE BY [Fuck oliver says:]

    Fuck oliver says:
    January 21, 2018 at 5:06 pm
    This peice of shit has taken our daughter with no good reason. We are not scared of standing up to
    this so called democracy. Tvp are corrupt, Oliver is corrupt. WHY ARE WE STANDING BACK AND
    LETTING THEM GET AWAY WITH IT?our daughter is about to turn 15 ,yet 6 months ago this monster
    removed her. Why not remove her 16 year old sister if we are bad parents? We work 24 7 and because
    of our NON engagement she was taken up north. 4 x hospital admissions with self harm and suicidal
    thoughts, our daughter. WE ARE NOT SCARED! This is the tip of the iceberg in regards to our daughter.
    WE MUST FIGHT!

    Mr. Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, and Government Legal Department,
    I have no need or desire to visit HHJ Simon Oliver’s home, the now-former Provincial Grand Secretary,
    Berkshire Freemasonry, will explain why.

    Secondly, Berkshire and other Freemasons that do not support Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver have
    visited me.

    Finally, following HHJ Simon Oliver’s email on 11 February 2013 15:21 to Master Bancroft-Rimmer, at
    the Civil Court of Appeal, it is now known that the Crown Prosecution Service had reviewed my case
    and request that the police visit me. It has been confirmed that the police officer that was tasked to
    visit me made a false entry on a police log, falsely alleging that she had attended my home and spoken
    to me at length. The email that it is alleged was sent to Thames Valley Police cannot be found!

    Leonard Lawrence
    18 June 2020
    ——————————————————————————–
    I suggest WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver knows who is posting as Fuck Oliver’s says:

    Facebook postings:

    Posting by daughter

    14 September 2017 ·

    UPDATE ;;;;;

    I was in court on the 6th October to fight to get me home and the Judge ( Judge Simon Oliver ) didn’t
    take into concept of what myself and my parents had to say to try get me home. He focused on all the
    lies the corrupt social services have made. We were meant to get seen at 10am but ended up getting
    seen at 2:10pm because the judge had a cough but I believe he was too busy taking bribes off some
    more people. I then walked out of he court room and the court and had a mental breakdown outside.
    Once I got back I had a panic attack and was very emotional. A get reading reporter came to report all
    of this but they had a melt down about it and sent him away and threatened us all of imprisonment
    if we spoke with the reporter. I spoke to the judge before hand and broke down crying in front of him
    begging him to let me go home. Yet he didn’t care.

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE KEEP SHARING!!!!!

    I have been debating whether to post this for quite a while now but the public is the only thing that
    can help myself and my family now.
    02/08/17.. that was when I received the worst possible news. That the social services have got a court
    order to take me away from my parents, friends, family, my area.. literally everything. I told the judge,
    my solicitor, social worker and many others that I didn’t want to move yet they didn’t take into
    consideration how I feel and what would happen to my mental health if I got removed. I then hid for
    two days and then the police found me when I was walking through a field.

    They raided my friends houses at 4am and 6am looking for me even though no one knew where I was,
    along with my parents. They also went round my house with 15 – 20 police officers to search my house
    and even turned up with the dog unit and a key to knock off my door. My parents, sister and brother
    had no clue where I was and was as concerned as they were. Yet they arrested my parents and kicked
    my dogs, sister and brother out of the house for the night. The police took their house keys and put
    my house as a crime scene.

    My parents recorded it and had posted it on YouTube so you can see how disgusting the police treated
    my house and my mum and dad. Once I got found they took my to Newbury police station and made
    me wait for three and a half hours. Two police officers took me to The oaks in Leicester and I got there
    at 12:30am. Since I have been removed my hair has been falling out excessively and my appetite has
    been effected massively. I have became very depressed and have been in and out of hospital. I rarely
    sleep and I isolate myself. I have also gained many stress rashes on my face.

    The staff at the oaks shouldn’t be working in a care home as they treat all the kids there terribly. The
    manager made fun of a girl with anorexia and the assistant manager called another child ‘scum’.
    They slag off my parents and myself to other staff members who then discuss my private stuff with
    other kids in the home. I would isolate myself all day and no one would come and see if I’m okay when
    they know how I have been feeling. One night for dinner I was given two bread rolls and that was it.
    I rarely sleep and most nights I’m crying. I have become very depressed and suicidal but the social
    services don’t care.

    I have managed to get it back to court on the 6th of October but the judge is very corrupt. He takes
    bribes of people which he calls ‘gifts’. I will put a link to a website about what he does at the end.
    The staff at the oaks also call a girl ‘ a little chink ‘ and they say every Asian is related to her. They
    always try to push you to a point where they get a reaction. I am only 14 I know but I know the
    difference of what is right and what is wrong and I know full well I shouldn’t of been removed from
    my parents. They are good parents but the social services made up so many lies just to get me removed.
    Me and India, another child at the oaks, have been tormented by the staff non-stop and it’s utterly
    disgusting. This was meant to be a “therapeutic care home” yet I have received no therapy what so
    ever. Darren Grimshaw, the assistant manager, said to a child ‘ you should keep watching wentworth
    because that’s where your end up you little bitch’.

    When I got admitted to hospital overnight I found out that Lyndsay Bryden, the manager, went
    through my diary which has personal stuff in. She had no right or reason to go through it. Complaints
    have been made. I have been blocked from wifi and they are trying to take my phones off me but I won’t
    let them as I use them to get hold of my parents and friends.

    Yesterday ( 13/08/17 ) I got told I was moving placement that day. I was very shocked and scared as i
    had no notice the following days. I got taken even further away from home and got taken to hospital
    again for suicidal thoughts. I have self-harmed since I have been removed which I never done whilst
    I was with my parents. I am posting this to try and expose what horrible people kids are getting placed
    with and how disgusting the social services have treated myself and my family and friends. If you know
    anyone who can help me or my family please message me as I am trying my hardest to get myself home.

    PLEASE LIKE, SHARE AND COMMENT!!!!
    I have also attached images of my hair, rash and the dirt I have lived in since I got moved to the oaks.

    https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCTOI7CKoLhOCEaHmOo0p6AA

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

  115. Dear Friends,

    3 years ago a family member said “To be Black (or Brown) and poor in this world means that justice does not
    exist for you and your life means NOTHING.

    What’s the point in calling for JUSTICE when the definition isn’t the same for you?

    What’s the point in being law-abiding when they will always see you as a threat?

    What’s the point in telling someone to “be safe” when the streets, the institutions and this world are not.

    What’s the point in saying it will get better when for hundreds of years, the injustice, inequality and racism
    remains the same albeit in different forms.”

    Never are these words more true than now. Be safe, injustice, these are words that mean different things
    to different people and when I look at what is happening in the world right now and I reflect on our ongoing
    battle I can’t put my hand on my heart and say I don’t believe that if we didn’t have an African family name,
    we wouldn’t have been treated differently.

    The outcome would certainly be the same, the lies, corruption, cover- up BUT the micro aggressive behaviours
    we experience, the profiling, the dehumanisation by the institutionally racist police and others in authority,
    I argue would have not existed.

    Life matters ?

  116. If there are any good police officers of judiciary, then they need to start speaking out because the corrupt ones are taking you down with them.

  117. Thank you Thames Valley Police

    Transcribed from the official recording by AUSCRIPT LIMITED
    TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
    10TH FEBRUARY 2014
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
    (QUEENS BENCH DIVISION)
    SITTING AT READING COUNTY COURT
    Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER

    JUDGE OLIVER
    Page 5
    16. “…in discussion with the presiding judge in relation to civil matters, the Honourable
    Mr Justice Singh, I was appointed the President of the Queens Bench Division…”
    —————————————————————————-
    COURTS ON TRIBUNALS JUDICIARY

    The Right Honourable Sir Brian Henry Leveson was appointed President of the Queen’s Bench
    Division in October 2013 and retired as President of the Queen’s Bench Division with effect from
    23 June 2019.
    ——————————-
    It is, also, only fair to Mr. Justice Rabinder Singh now The Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Rabinder Singh,
    be allowed the opportunity to refute the claims.

    Leonard Lawrence

  118. Anonymous says:
    June 19, 2020 at 1:29 pm
    If there are any good police officers of judiciary, then they need to start speaking out because the corrupt ones are taking you down with them.

    From Leonard Lawrence in reply to Anonymous says:

    There are both good police officers and judiciary, including some within Thames Valley Police.

    However, there is bullying within the police service and the judicary. Increasingly, more and more websites
    like HHJ Simon Oliver, judges behaving badly are appearing. See below:

    Private Intelligence Agency,
    Intelligence UK LLP / Stop Corruption UK LLP is the UK’s first private intelligence agency dedicated to
    targeting perpetrators of domestic corruption in the public and private sectors

    http://www.intelligenceuk.com/newsx16.html

  119. Len, not only did Oliver accuse you of causing civil unrest outside his property but he also accused a doctor of plotting an anthrax attack against him! and holding his family hostage! Nothing which is supported with any evidence! Simon Oliver has really let himself down on this one and to say that he is now issuing and misusing committal proceedings is even a bigger joke. We would all like to see the evidence he is relying upon.

  120. BG says:
    June 19, 2020 at 11:17 pm

    Len, not only did Oliver accuse you of causing civil unrest outside his property but he also accused a doctor of plotting an anthrax attack against him! and holding his family hostage! Nothing which is supported with any evidence! Simon Oliver has really let himself down on this one and to say that he is now issuing and misusing committal proceedings is even a bigger joke. We would all like to see the evidence he is relying upon.

    From Leonard Lawrence in reply to Anonymous says:

    Dear BG
    Yes, HHJ Simon Oliver accuse me of planning civil unrest outside his Wokingham home
    Yes, Mr Shaikh was accused of plotting an anthrax attack.

    What is puzzling is The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement Oliver v Shaikh [2019]
    EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was posted within hours of the hearing on the
    29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the Approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable
    Mr. Justice Julian Knowles on the 10 December 2019.

    Leonard Lawrence

  121. Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms Homes,

    The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB)

    What is puzzling is how The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was
    posted within hours of the hearing on the 29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the
    Approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles on
    the 10 December 2019.

    Approved Judgement-Matrix Chambers
    29 Nov 2019-HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER
    Claiment..harassment against the defendant, Javid Sheikh, who was a litigant in proceedings.

    http://www.matrixlaw.co.uk › judgments › judge-wins-summ…
    Dec 10, 2019 – Judge wins summary judgment against harassing litigant in High Court …

    Ms Homes,
    Whilst I have not been named in Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB), I have a specific interest in paragraphs 52.
    and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement. Would you please enquire
    with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of these specific allegations
    that His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence) prior to
    seeking summary judgment.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  122. Hi Len,
    Chances are the submission to the Matrix Chambers website would have been sent by email.
    That means multiple logs, particularly those of Oliver’s service provider through which the email
    was sent, and those of the Matrix Chambers email accounts.

    The email would be timestamped as it passed through different email providers, and it could well have
    been digitally signed, so any attempt to change the timestamp would lead to a failure to verify the email
    when used with authentication tools.

    You could ask someone in Matrix Chambers Rachel Holmes to get you the original email with time stamps.

  123. so his honour judge Simon Oliver does not like people writing about him on this website and on the internet in general!? Well, I guess we should start copying this blog with all the comments. Lets spread the word now! And start copying

  124. Lenny

    Look for evidence that a pre-written judgement was written prior to the oral hearing on the 29 November 2019

  126. Predetermined decision = rigged, corruption, dishonest judiciary, misconduct, perversion of justice.

    Equal treatment before the law is a pillar of democratic societies. When courts are
    corrupted by greed or political expediency, the scales of justice are tipped, and ordinary people
    suffer. Judicial corruption means the voice of the innocent goes unheard, while the guilty act with
    impunity.
    –Huguette Labelle, Chair of Transparency International (TI), 2007

  127. Judicial independence is a necessity for a non-corrupt judiciary, but it is not enough, since an
    independent judiciary itself might be corrupt. Judges must also be impartial, honest and
    competent. It is hard to exaggerate the negative consequences of judicial corruption, both
    nationally and internationally: combating transnational crime and terrorism becomes unfeasible; it
    diminishes economic and human development; and it denies citizens their long
    recognized right to impartial dispute settlements.

  128. From: len lawrence
    Sent: 21 June 2020 00:20
    To: rachelholmes@matrixlaw.co.uk
    Cc: fraud@ukfraudreport.co.uk

    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms. Holmes,

    Please would you inquire with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of the specific
    allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs
    52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone
    seeking summary judgement?

    Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within paragraphs 52. and 53 can be identified,
    if required.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc

  129. They are all at it Len,

    Pre written judgements as I experienced in the court of appeal and outcome driven ones in the lower courts. corruptionaboundsintheuk.wordpress.com

  130. Dear Len

    This can only have been achieved by a predetermined decision,

    Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement

    “What is puzzling is how The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was
    posted within hours of the hearing on the 29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the
    approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles “.

    Moreover, the Approved Judgement cannot be superseded by any other document. Likewise
    if the Approved Judgment was found to have mistakes contained within , the Approved
    Judgement would be cancelled /recalled.

    It is a simple issue of these twats wanting to have all their ducks in a row and the author of
    the your Judgement AINT Judge Knowles

    Alan

  131. All cases start here with TVP instructions, where all are systematically pre-planned
    and yes to your question all stating orders come from Oliver

    starts with picking the victim via getting stalked by TVP,

    1 Parents get unexpected visits for no reason and challenges made with aggregation
    pre-planned to remove the parent/parents whether guilty or not by any means

    2 the home is ransacked without warrants excuse is for ID and steal children, silence the parents by mistaking keeping them locked up,

    3. falsify orders in false names, produce and stamp data in silence courts without any communication with parents

    4. when challenged, everyone, who helped the parents curiously resign
    Through threats by Oliver and his TVP team,

    We have a case where the mother has 4 release orders for a child, but Judge Oliver has instructed the social service to ignore them, although these rules overwrite his long. Oliver believes that being deleted from the system as never produced is the answer to anyone via blocking or preventing the return of a child we experienced this 1st hand by the head of the social service who reported this when written a letter of breach
    as gagging is a criminal offence, indirect and direct

    his answer was that he does not know how to respond. His hands are tied to Oliver’s request since he too has no job and will face the prison. So we brought him up to date on punishing ignorance of the government in both directions.

  132. Check out the high court judges profiles. The scumbags have all gone to Cambridge university or Oxford university. Looks like Cambridge and Oxford university are breeding grounds for crooked judges to bring harm to British civilians. Now you know why people look down at court judges. They are evil to the core and when you talk about them on the internet, they hate it

    https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/high-court-judges-2017

  133. These are Her Majesty’s judiciary. When you take into account the Marxist activity currently taking place around the world and the fact that the public is becoming increasingly aware of public corruption and outright crime, then the monarchy itself is on the brink of destruction. There will be statues erected to Simon Oliver for kicking it all off – the decline of the British Empire.

    Is the Lord Chief Justice being prevented from taking action by the Queen herself?

  134. Capt. Lawrence

    Go on to twitter, Find someone who is interested in your subject, or trying to cover it up, then leave a reply
    in their pinned tweet in the form of an image that conveys the key info.

    That way when anyone browses the replies in their pinned tweet you get your message at the top in a nice
    convenient format.

    Also since each image upload is different timestamp, the images are treated differently, which means they
    cannot be marked as spam

    Guile

  135. Leonard

    Cosslett & Barr Forensic Document Examination.

    Forensic Science Report on;

    Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB)

  136. I can type up to 50 words per minute and I must admit, even I can’t write a judgement to that length within a couple of hours and then upload it.

  137. Sir Jonathan Guy Jones KCB QC
    HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Profession

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Case No: QB/2019/000194

    HM Procurator General in the above litigation Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver made several
    false allegations against me, that neither Government Legal Services and their instructed barrister
    Benjamin Silverstone ‘Matrix Chambers’ alerted me to, prior to obtaining a summary judgement
    from The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Queens Bench Division.

    Judiciary and lawyers are not exempt from interference from higher authority. I understand that
    the Ministry of Justice are financing Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver litigation. Mr Shaikh
    has provided me with copies of all documents served upon him.

    I am advised that the case has now been passed to The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin.

    I am awaiting a reply from Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building,
    Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LNP why Matrix Chambers and barrister Benjamin Silverstone did not
    informed me of the specific allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me
    (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs 52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement,
    prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin will also need to be advised of HHJ Simon Oliver appointment
    to President of the Queens Bench Division. Please see below.

    Transcribed from the official recording by AUSCRIPT LIMITED
    HHJ Simon Oliver on the 10th February 2014 at Reading County Court.
    HHJ Simon Oliver
    16….in discussion with the presiding judge in relation to civil matters, the Honourable Mr Justice
    Singh, I was appointed the President of the Queens Bench Division………… I am already an S9 Family
    Division Reading High Court Judge.

    HM Procurator General,
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has sound reasons to discredit me.
    A Section 9 Family Judge does not automatically hold a Court of Protection authorisation. There is
    a period from around 2011 until 7 October 2015 when His Honour Judge Oliver was of the mistaken
    belief that he could hear Court of Protection cases.

    Likewise, Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver belief that the Honourable Mr Justice Singh, had
    appointed HHJ Simon Oliver the President of the Queens Bench Division, how many Civil Restraint
    Orders and Extended Civil Restraint Orders has HHJ Simon Oliver issued in the mistaken belief,
    I suggest, that he was President of the Queens Bench Division

    HM Procurator General,
    The allegations regarding my mental health

    Re: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

    On the 8 February, 2006
    Consultant Psychiatrist Wing Commander Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych RAF Rtd
    wrote a medical report about me to the Court of Protection London. The report cannot be disclosed
    and was destroyed by Goverment Legal Services and the Ministry of Justice, possibly as a result of
    my exposure to organophosphates.

    I now have a copy of this report, however, the report is marked as follows:

    LEONARD LAWRENCE
    THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED
    TO ANY OTHER PARTY UNLESS THE COURT SO DIRECTS.

    Professor Gordon Turnbull identifies the retriggering of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
    arising out of events some 20 years earlier in 1984. Professor Gordon Turnbull writes within his
    2006 medical report that he has known me since 1997. Prior to this date Air Vice-Marshal Patrick
    O’Connor FRCPsych dealt with incidents in 1991 and the re-triggering of PTSD.

    In March 2013 an incident occurred (that in 2020 is still unfolding) this time a PTSD specialist whose
    background, like myself, is Royal Navy intervened. He is one of the very few officers that one can
    speak freely with, without fear of prosecution under the Official Secrets Act 1911-1989. My primary
    PTSD trigger is now believed to have occurred in 1975 whilst I was in the Royal Navy.

    The bullying by some within Government Legal Services, that again started in March 2013 stopped
    suddenly in September 2013. The reason for this bullying is now known and those responsible now
    identified, including His Honour Judge Simon Oliver !

    In 2016 a Deputy Assistant Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service,
    dealt with a matter swiftly.

    Every few weeks I am visited by a Government Services PTSD specialist whose identity also cannot
    be disclosed. He also treated Captain Simon Hayward (Life Guards) following his false imprisonment
    in a Swedish prison. He also treats other servicemen and women free of charge !!

    He and one other drove me to the appointment with the Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox Q.C. Attorney General
    for England and Wales. Since that meeting in late 2018 with the Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox Q.C. the bullying
    had stopped.

    However, as Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver, Government Legal Services, and Matrix Chambers’
    wish to resurrect picking on the ‘little people’ and like so many other servicemen and women again
    facing homelessness I have asked for assistance.

    Richard Anelay QC:
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that you were a patient and
    subject to the Court of Protection”.

    [District Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation]

    Only in August 2019 did Thames Valley Police released information that identified they had known of
    the failure of BP Collins Solicitors and others to disclose my protected status to the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence
    22 June 2020
    ——————————————————————————
    Len,
    The incident you discussed with me the other day, you know what it was, so will not discuss here
    as these days nobody can trust any Government departments or police! What occurred may well
    be defined as a severe traumatic event, where other’s lives including your own were in imminent
    danger, complicated further by what you had to do. Then suffering the after-effects from those
    released later. This action in 1975 may well have triggered a traumatic reaction that was not
    addressed at the time, but triggered later by what you stated (the door) by Police!
    You know what I mean.
    …..

  140. Leonard

    Pre-written judgements !!!

    The Organophosphate Poisoning litigation (OP)

    Legal firms involved represented Gulf War Syndrome cases, Organophosphate poisoning cases
    (including Sheep Dip poisoning), and vaccine damage cases. All involved government which had
    reason to defend such cases against the plaintiffs.

    Gulf War and OP cases were instructed to take part in a so-called pilot study with the claim that
    it would obtain evidence of causation but there was no peer reviewed science to support that
    proposition, even though some of the tests presented a considerable risk to those taking part.
    The Pilot Study was never completed.

    Initially, there were over 1,000 legal cases heading for court but the lawyers managed to reduce
    the numbers first to about 30 and then to just 13. Lawyers for the plaintiffs failed to present vital
    supporting evidence to the court during pre-trial hearings and failed to challenge false statements
    introduced by the defendants. Judges were informed of perjury and perversion of justice but failed
    to act on that information.

    Eventually government funded legal aid was withdrawn from all those groups leaving them with
    no way to prove their cases. None of those cases ever reached the stage of trial in open court in the
    UK, even though many involved serious ill-health caused by employer negligence.

    The various judgements and appeal judgements could not have been more favourable to the
    defendants had they written them themselves.

    The government also has control over Industrial Injury legislation and its officers have control
    over the decision making process for every case. As in the OP litigation officials of government
    introduce false evidence and ignore all supporting evidence in order to deny illnesses caused by
    the poisons.

    Even to the level of judicial Review vital internationally accepted evidence is ignored and legal
    representation is denied.

    Judges sent masses of supporting evidence, and evidence of corrupt practices, can ignore it all,
    even scientifically proven medical opinion, but amazingly appear to have a miraculous ability
    to prepare long written judgements whilst at the same time dealing in court with other complex
    financial and property cases.

    The speed with which they can produce written judgements in which they carefully ignore all
    evidence and precedents to protect the defence is truly remarkable.

    Disgracefully the OP litigation was allowed to set a precedent causing the required “Balance of
    Probabilities” standard of proof required in Civil Cases to be replaced by the almost impossible
    Scientific Standards of proof of causation as required in criminal cases – beyond any doubt.

    Because all poisons mimic natural diseases the defendants are now protected from liability
    litigation in the UK for the harm their products cause.

    Dark Waters

  141. Dear Dark Waters

    Are these details posted anywhere online besides here please?

  142. The judiciary is not independent of government or the monarchy. Why wasn’t Prince Charles called to give evidence in the Diana death case? All three components of this triad are corrupt and self-serving and I don’t think they are going to get away with it for much longer. Blood is likely to be spilled and, the way things are going out there, the blood baths have already started. They abuse their power and the people have absolutely had enough of these dangerous organised criminals.

  143. pgm@berkspgl.org.uk

    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons
    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road, Sindlesham
    Wokingham, Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Dear W Bro Howlett-Bolton,

    Re: Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Over the last few weeks, I have been contacted by freemasons wanting to know what has occurred to
    me. Their ranks range from Master Mason through to Senior London Grand Rank, and Provincial
    Grand Rank. Some plan to visit me after lockdown.

    Their occupations include Police Service, Armed Forces, and Government Services, many of whom
    have now retired. They wanted to know whether I had sufficient food etc, and did I need any
    money.

    An officer, Senior London Grand Rank, wants to know why I resigned from freemasonry after 30 years.
    Perhaps those below may care to explain:

    The Provincial Orator W Bro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    The Former Provincial Grand Secretary David Keys, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  144. The reply from:

    The Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Rachel Holmes
    Tue 23/06/2020 09:28

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    Thank you for your email.
    Your email relates to a case in which Mr Silverstone is instructed on behalf of the Claimant,
    to whom he owes professional obligations which mean that it would not be appropriate to
    respond to your query.

    Yours sincerely

    Rachel Holmes
    —————————————————————————-
    Leonard Lawrence Pilot says:
    June 20, 2020 at 11:24 pm

    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 21 June 2020 00:20
    To: rachel holmes@matrixlaw
    Cc: fraud@ukfraudreport.co.uk

    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive
    Matrix Chambers, Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5LN

    Dear Ms. Holmes,

    Please would you inquire with barrister Benjamin Silverstone why I was not informed of the
    specific allegations His Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made against me (Leonard Lawrence)
    in paragraphs 52. and 53. of Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement, prior to barrister
    Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within paragraphs 52. and 53 can
    be identified, if required.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc

  145. courtofprotection.reading.countycourt@justice.gov.uk. (Court of Protection)

    The Court of Protection, Reading County Court, Reading,
    Berkshire.

    Circuit Judges
    Last updated: 8 July 2019
    Name: His Honour Judge Oliver / Circuit South Eastern / Date of appointment 05/10/2010

    Chukwuma Uju | Judicial Appointments (Pre-Appointments) Advisor & Swearing-in Officer |
    Judicial Office for England & Wales | 10th Floor Thomas More Building | Royal Courts of Justice
    | Strand | WC2A 2LL |

    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    Thank you for your e-mail of 17 March, in which you asked for the following information from the
    Ministry of Justice (MoJ): “Would you be so kind as to advise me of the date that His Honour Judge
    Simon Oliver, DFJ Reading County Court, was appointed a ticketed Court of Protection judge?

    I can confirm that the department holds information that you have asked for, and I am pleased to
    provide this to you. His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on
    7 October 2015

    Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Head of the Government Legal Profession.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has sound reasons to discredit me.

    A Section 9 Family Judge does not automatically hold a Court of Protection authorisation. There is
    a period from around 2011 until 7 October 2015 when His Honour Judge Oliver was of the mistaken
    belief that he could hear Court of Protection cases.

    My Court of Protection Appeal was heard by HHJ Simon Oliver on the 16 April 2012 !

    THERE COULD BE HUNDREDS, EVEN A THOUSAND CASES LIKE MINE IN BERKSHIRE

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  146. The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP
    Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury, Minister for the Civil Service, and
    Minister for the Union

    WEBSITE: HHJ SIMON OLIVER judges behaving badly

    Throughout history, many of the men and women who went to war came home and their skills
    were adapted to help the civilian governments. Ex-military became police, firemen, paramedics,
    security guards, prison guards, other government jobs including the Security Services, MIS, MI5
    and SIS.

    It was also too common, that these people who had risked their lives serving their country and
    protecting others’ lives were treated poorly. Some were also exposed to, and implicated in the
    skulduggery that secretive agencies have.

    All of this was relatively common knowledge and tolerated to quite a high degree because of the
    glorification of the noble ‘vigilante’, and the ease of government cover-ups.

    Around five years ago, I recall reading that the United States of America gave warning to the
    United Kingdom Government. They said that the greatest threat to the United Kingdom came
    not from terrorism, but from former members of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces. These were people,
    deeply unhappy at how they and the public have and are being treated.

    For many years I personally have been fighting to expose serious corruption in police and courts.
    Not surprisingly, on reflection, the greatest assistance that I have received has come from police
    officers with an H.M. Armed Forces background! Including those that have attained the rank of
    Chief Constable, Assistant Commissioner and Assistant Chief Constable.

    As well as my own case and a big handful of individual cases that I know of notably in the Thames
    Valley Police Area, there has been maltreatment across various groups of ex-services people.

    Sunday the 17 January 2017
    Royal British Legion calls on Government to help on Gulf War illness.
    53,462 members of the British Arm Forces were deployed.
    33,000 UK veterans estimated to be suffering from Gulf War illness.

    March 2014 A findings paper by HM Inspectorate of Prisons
    The highest proportions of ex-Service personnel were located in high security prisons and category B
    training prisons (13% each)

    This is not the information the UK government wants people to hear. Some in government cover these
    things up. They do their smoke and mirrors, and use the bizarre obfuscation and avoidance of answers
    that is now the trademark of SOME politicians.

    The Attorney General, The. Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC was briefed in person in October 2018 what had
    occurred to me, when in February 2013 HHJ Simon Oliver was told by Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley to
    re-transfer my case to the Court of Appeal. The. Rt. Hon. Geoffrey Cox QC has provided me with the
    legal mechanism to set aside all judgments and court Orders that were placed upon me.

    I called on other ex-services people, to whistleblow and to expose the corruption by some, but not all,
    within the police and justice system. This request has and still is being answered by many including
    some Freemasons.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  147. Leonard Lawrence Pilot and Helen Mary CLIFT, office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts

    Written by ministryofjustice on July 1, 2012.

    6 October 2011
    Boeing Aircraft Company
    Settle claim for neurotoxins in aircraft cabin air, in a case filed in the United States of America.

    4 July 2005
    Leonard Lawrence 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT
    identified Toxic Cabin Air and Organophosphate poisoning.

    No evidence exists that this report was ever disclosed to Slough and Reading County Court by solicitor
    Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.

  148. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    30 August 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, is entirely satisfied by the non disclosure of the
    1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT and Court of Protection, Medical Reports by the
    Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts and solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe
    Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading.

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, is also entirely satisfied that Leonard Lawrence interests were fully and
    fairly protected by the Official Solicitor and solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors
    Reading by the non disclosure of the 1990 NHS & COMMUNITY CARE ASSESSMENT REPORT. Others do
    not support His Honour Judge Oliver,

    Law Society investigating Solicitor report dated 30 September 2009.
    Disclosed 2011
    The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater
    duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr Lawrence feel should have been taken
    to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision
    and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection.

    24 August 2011 Law Society, Legal Services,
    Disclose correspondence sent by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection on 20 July
    2010 Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

    The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504-2008. “Issues raised by
    Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis that they indicate
    areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an extremely vulnerable
    adult”.

  149. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    FROM:
    Dr Vanessa Davies, Director, Bar Standards Board

    We do not have any powers to make Mr Brazil, Mr Allen answer your queries.
    (Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk and Nicholas Allen)
    .
    The current Official Solicitor (Mr Pitblado) wrote to the Bar Standards Board on 24 June 2009.

    In his letter he explained that the point had not been reached at which the Court of Protection
    should have been notified of the existence of the CP3.

    As the Bar Standards Board was entitled to do, we took views of the Official Solicitor Mr Pitblado.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.

    Dr Vanessa Davies, Director, Bar Standards Board
    QUOTE
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.
    The fact that you were a patient was plain from supporting documents.

  150. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    As this website has the attention of the following:
    Ministry of Justice
    Treasury Solicitors
    Police
    Matrix Chambers and many others in the UK and abroad, let us continual.

    24 August 2011
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority to the Court of Protection;
    Mr. Lawrence had come within the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection

  151. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Hospital Medical Director Report reference:
    Leonard Lawrence He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity.
    During the period the Official Solicitor of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem,
    three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s) had been obtained but not registered
    with the Court of Protection.

    He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to
    the Court of Protection. During this time considerable amounts of his assets went missing.

  152. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry Malcolm Hooper
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215)

    In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation
    claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care.

  153. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Graham C. Holt Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advance Study), Basel, Switzerland
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220)

    At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the
    harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence…. His story was one of costly legal battles to prove
    that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally unfit.

    What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked knowledge of
    the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the legal profession in
    not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance to tackle
    those culpable.

    [those culpable include the following].
    Solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts.
    Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk
    Barrister Nicholas Allen QC 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser OGR Stock Denton LLP
    Solicitor Sarah B Belfield (Reading Berkshire)

  154. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Director of the Neuropsychology Toxicology Unit London University College London.
    Date: Sat, 5 May 2012
    Subject: Re: FW: Neurotoxins

    Dear Len,

    Thank you for the update – I hope you are OK? –

    I hope the hospital consultants can help you. I would be happy to talk to them if you think that
    would be helpful. I would be very interested to know how you get on in the future so please keep
    in touch if you can?

    Best wishes,

  155. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Consultant Haematologist
    Dear Mr Lawrence
    I am sorry that we will not be able to accept you as a donor. This is because of your history of
    organophosphate poisoning that has left you with ongoing nervous system problems.

    Consultant Haematologist

  156. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    Dear Len,
    Thank you for keeping me updated and of new matters arising concerning OPs. I have as promised been
    circulating to various media agencies what you permitted me to do. My wish is that sooner rather than
    later someone is GOING TO TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY or are we again going to suffer another PTSD sage.

    A diagnosis put up in the DSM II in 1968 then ignored entirely until the Americans decided to name another
    illness with all the criteria of Reactive depression into PTSD in 1980 called the DSM IV. One wonders if a
    deliberate and orchestrated campaign is again being waged against such people. Since the Hillsborough
    Disaster when to Police officers witnessing that incident unfolding knew things were wrong.

    A cover up by Police, Lawyers and all and sundry. An absolute disgrace by all named that has caused so
    much heart ache, distress to so many bereaved families. This has now been confirmed by families NOT
    GIVING IN to deceptions.

    My one wish again is that by individuals like yourself NEVER GIVE IN, but stand resolute and strong in
    bringing down these corrupt and deceitful persons who were responsible for all your hurt and pain too.

    Rest assured I am alongside you in exposing this unlawful and criminal activity.

    Take care my friend,
    xxxxxxx
    (Royal Navy)

  157. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light

    Professor of Psychiatry
    Dear Leonard,
    Good to hear from you. I hope you’re feeling well. Thanks also for the report.
    Things seem to be moving now.

    Best wishes,
    Go Bravely
    (RAF)

  158. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light. [including WBro HHJ Simon Oliver]

    Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence,

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey Court of Protection,
    Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  159. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Principal Registry of the Family Division From:
    eliot.webster@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk To: bae146@hotmail.co.uk
    Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:00:33 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    The appeal application needs to be lodged with the Court of Protection.
    They are based in the Thomas More Building at the Royal Court of Justice
    (switchboard number is 020 7947 6000). You will also require leave to appeal, unless HHJ Simon Oliver
    granted this and this need to be included in the appeal. The Court of Protection Act 2007, Rules 172 & 175
    will assist you. The file, in the first instance, should be sent to the Court of Protection.
    I hope this information assists.

    Kind Regards,

  160. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Eliot Webster Principal Registry of the Family Division
    Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:13:01 +0100 Subject:
    RE: Appeal High Court Family Judge

    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    I referred the matter to the Senior District Judge, District Judge Waller, who informed me of the details
    I provided you in the e-mail which I sent you yesterday at 14:01. I suggest that the appeal is issued before
    the file is transferred to the Court of Protection. I hope the above information assists.

    Kind Regards,
    Eliot Webster
    Principal Registry of the Family Division

  161. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Acting Senior Master Leslie
    Queen’s Bench Division
    Royal Courts of Justice.

    ” There is leave to issue this claim against the Official Solicitor.”

    Acting Senior Master Leslie Quote: “ disgraceful”

  162. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Mr Anelay QC
    Deputy High Court Judge, Family Division,
    Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk
    informs Leonard Lawrence that barrister Mr Dominic Brazil had informed Mr Anelay QC that
    Leonard Lawrence had been a patient and subject to the Court of Protection

  163. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Compliance and Regulatory Manager Keith Watts
    Compliance and Regulatory Unit,
    Office of the Public Guardian Ref CSCU516/08
    The Court of Protection has no record of any application being received for you.
    It was clearly the responsibility of the holder of the medical certificate to ensure an application was
    made.

    Martin John.
    Chief Executive and the Public Guardian letter.
    It would have been the responsibility of the certificate holder to make an application to the Court
    of Protection.

  164. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    The Law Society Solicitor Disclosed 2011.
    As acknowledged by the firm, (solicitor Sarah B, Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors Reading)
    it had Mr Lawrence sign forms when he clearly lacked capacity.

    The Law Society Solicitor.
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504.
    The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the
    greater duty to protect him. I consider majority of the steps Mr Lawrence feels should have been taken
    to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision
    and action necessary to invoke the protection of the Court of Protection

    The Law Society,
    Solicitors Regulatory Authority, FINAL REPORT CRO/97504.
    “Issues raised by Mr Lawrence are significant and should be investigated and responded to on the basis
    that they indicate areas in which the legal system appears to have failed to sufficiently protect an
    extremely vulnerable adult”.

  165. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    —————————————————————————————
    Email NAllen@29bedfordrow.co.uk 05 August 2005 10.30

    From Nicholas Allen To Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk

    Subject: Lawrence

    As requested. I have simply “accepted all” the tracked changes.

    I haven’t fully checked what effect this has had on the draft order, but hope that it is sufficient for
    your purposes

    Best Wishes!

    Nick
    ——————————————————————————-
    25 August 2010
    Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row Chambers
    I am unable to provide “evidence that supports my oral statement to DJ Fortgang that the Official
    Solicitor (Laurence Oades) agreed that the house be sold for 622,000.”
    ——————————————————————————-
    Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office,
    “The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.”
    ——————————————————————————–

  166. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Detective Chief Superintendent Russ Middleton,
    Crime and Justice Department
    Devon & Cornwall Police

    Dear Mr Lawrence
    I can confirm that no Court of Protection Certificates were released to us by the Law Society, therefore
    no certificates were passed to Thames Valley Police when they took on the investigation.

  167. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE
    4/10/06 District Judge Jones
    Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice
    proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no knowledge
    of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the ancillary relief application.
    My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill for assessment.(2006) I cannot find
    the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified myself from everything, that would include
    the legal aid assessment.

    On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four hearings
    that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself.

    Mr. Lawrence was certified under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and a patient subject to the Court of
    Protection. Distrist Judge Jones was not a authorised Court of Protection judge.

  168. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    NOTE TO CIRCUIT JUDGE RE APPEAL OF MR. LAWRENCE 4/10/06
    District Judge Jones
    Mr. Lawrence was convinced that Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel had shown me his without prejudice
    proposal on a previous occasion. Mrs. Lawrence’s Counsel said he had not. I certainly had no
    knowledge of this, but for the avoidance of any doubt disqualified myself from hearing the
    ancillary relief application. My next involvement was when RDG submitted their legal aid bill
    for assessment.(2006) I cannot find the ORDER I made disqualifying myself. If I said I disqualified
    myself from everything, that would include the legal aid assessment.

    On 25 October 2006 HHJ Campbell conducts search of Slough County Court and identifies four
    hearings that DJ Jones conducted after DJ Jones made a ORDER disqualifying herself.

    Mr. Lawrence was certified under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 and was a patient subject to the
    Court of Protection. District Judge Jones did not hold a Court of protectin authorisation.

  169. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    JF/LAW/130835 Corporate Legal Team. Legal Service Commission cannot lawfully grant funding to
    an individual if they are not financially eligible.

    The LSC Manual, Volume 2 Part F Pages 298 to 303. CLSMEANS1 identifies Mr. Lawrence had been
    £331,622 over the eligibility limit

    In 2008/9 Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
    and barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, attempted to gain a Civil Restraint Order
    against Leonard Lawrence.

    This was stopped by Her Honour Judge Ann Campbell, His Honour Judge Elly and District Judge Kathryn
    McCulloch. BP Collins Solicitors and Dominic Brazil of Counsel had also failed to disclose to the court a
    Certificate of Mental Incapacity they held under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 that was issued to
    safeguard Leonard Lawrence at Slough County Court

  170. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    APPLICATION FOR CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER BY SOLICITOR SUSAN ANDREWS
    District Judge McCulloch “It’s not going to happen”

    28 August 2008
    Solicitor Susan Andrews BP Collins Solicitors
    “This is an application that is likely to come to £4000”

    District Judge McCulloch
    “You have only written two letters”

    Slough County Court March 2009
    District Judge McCulloch
    “It’s not going to happen”

    District Judge McCulloch dismissed Susan Andrews and BP Collins Solicitors fee’s of nearly £15,000.

  171. I don’t want to detract from the conversation, but merely to ADD to it. The corruption runs deep. We already know that the Official Solicitor, Alastair Pitblado, was named by the Metropolitan Police. They allege that he contacted them and told them to “make life difficult for Mr. Lawrence”. They also advised him that they were not going to do so.

    However, we also know that the DWP and HMRC simultaneously took steps to accuse Mr. Lawrence of fraud and tax evasion, and to cut him off his benefits, leaving him without the means to support life. He was evicted onto the street. This happened at the same time as the phone call from Pitblado. However, we have information to suggest that someone who is not yet dead was also involved.

    We also know that “somebody” burned his house down while he was still in it.

    So here is a link that will help everyone get an all-round picture of what is going on in the UK. This has to stop. If Oliver isn’t stopped then we will all be coming after those above him. It mentions officials who are using organised crime to do their dirty work.

    Watch this.

    Expect us.

  172. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    May Maughan, The Deputy Official Solicitor:

    “We are not prepared to answer any further queries and your correspondence in future, whether by
    e-mail, hard copy letter, or telephone, will not be answered, nor acknowledged.
    Yours sincerely
    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor Office of the Official Solicitor and Public Trustee
    Tel: 020 7911 7121 – may.maughan@offsol.gsi.gov.uk

    Only when after six years had elapsed and May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor was of the belief
    that Leonard Lawrence was out of time to bring a claim for damages did Simpson Millar LLP solicitors
    apply for, and May Maughan release, previously undisclosed documents from Leonard Lawrence case
    files.

    On the 20 April 2012 Paul Hicks a solicitor with Simpson Millar LLP informed Leonard Lawrence that
    on disclosure of Leonard Lawrence files from the Official Solicitors office, May Maughan, Deputy Official
    Solicitor in a telephone conversation had admitted liability for Leonard Lawrence non registration with
    the Court of Protection by SOLICITOR Helen Clift.

    How Simpson Millar LLP could represent Leonard Lawrence since 2008 without gaining his case files is
    unknown.

    The documents St Philips Chambers had sought could not be found on inspection of the Official Solicitors
    files in March 2012 at Simpson Millar LLP office. Photos taken show pages having been torn out of files.
    Some of what was found is detailed below Alistair Pitblado, Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court
    submission to the Bar Standards Board dated 24 June 2009 identified that the court was not told by his
    solicitors that Court of Protection CP3’s had been processed, that psychiatrists had identified that Mr.
    Lawrence required the Court of Protection, and that Mr. Lawrence interests must be protected.

    a) Rosemary Sanders (Solicitor at OS) 27 June 2005 email Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Once we have
    a satisfactory CP3 we can apply to the Court of Protection for authority to sign a release of his rights
    of occupation… this would have to be supported by a court order dealing with the property. As matters
    stand the psychiatrist has completed a CP3.

    b) James Beck (Solicitor at OS) 1 August 2005 I spoke to Sarah Benfield RDG Solicitors: Obviously, the
    sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority.

    c) Piper, Steve (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 I said that the OS would send the form to the Court of
    Protection who would make the appropriate order.

    d) Clift, Helen (OSPT) Sent: 02 February 2006 To: Piper, Steve (OSPT)
    Subject: RE: Mr Lawrence
    ok essentially it should allow the solicitors to release to him the funds they are holding.

    The paper trail of the Stephen Piper and Helen Clift office of the Official Solicitor sending the form to
    the Court of Protection to make the appropriate order has not been found.

    Helen Clift made the financial decisions not Laurence Oades the former Official Solicitor.

    Records identify Helen Clift failed to disclose to two District Judges and His Honour Judge Elly the need
    for the Court of Protection.

    Helen Clift had also given the instructions to gain Leonard Lawrence signature on legal aid forms.
    —————————————————————————–
    HHJ SIMON OLIVER !!!

    HHJ Simon Oliver writes at point 27 on his Judgement “H says that his counsel, at the hearing on
    18th August 2005, says that the Official Solicitor did not agree the sale of the fmh at £622,000.
    However, there is no evidence of this”.

    HHJ Simon Oliver has clearly not read the following information:

    RDG Solicitors notes 18 August 2005 disclosed 2012:-
    Barrister Simon Calhaem
    “wife has accepted an offer and has exchanged contracts without recourse to the Official Solicitor”

    Barrister Simon Calhaem “wife is in breach of the order by not agreeing the sale price,”

    A SEARCH OF READING COUNTY COURT FOUND THAT THE HHJ SIMON OLIVER HAD THE ABOVE
    RECORDS AVAILABLE TO HIM

  173. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Mr. A. Wilson FRCS FFAEM FRCS (Consultant Surgeon) Clinical Director Royal London Hospital
    Mr. A. Wilson FRCS, Dr McGhee FFARCS, Dr Murray and Mr. Edmond all had been considered unsuitable
    to act as guardian ad litem by District Judges at Slough County Court.

  174. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Professor of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and of Neurobiology
    (Paid for by British Airline Pilots Association)
    Tau and MBP suggest the presence of moderate brain injury.
    Consistent with chemical –induced nervous system injury.

    Professor Ramsden, Cranfield University Workshop
    Leonard Lawrence invited to talk about his medical history and the failure of the legal system to protect him.

    PRESS RELEASE 1 November 2011.
    Ref UK Department of Transport “Aircraft Cabin Air Sampling Study”
    This report actually found significant concentration of organophosphate neurotoxins and other noxious
    substances in cabin air even under normal flying conditions.

  175. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor advised that she not make available to the Queens Bench
    Division, Royal Courts of Justice for the hearing on the 14 January 2013 Court of Protection Medical
    Certificates CP3′s and other certificates of mental incapacity issued under Part V11 Mental Health Act
    1983 that were not disclosed to the courts by Helen Clift a solicitor within the office of the Official Solicitor

    May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor advised that her office does not hold copies of the case files of
    the external legal representatives Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors, Reading, Berks who were appointed
    by the Official Solicitor.

    May Maughan personally sent part of Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors files to Simpson Millar LLP
    Bristol on the 20 March 2012 that included the disclosure of a notebook from which pages had been
    cut out.

    The notes of the conference held at 29 Bedford Row Chambers prior to the Final Hearing that Mr Day
    of counsel had sought have still not been disclosed by the Official Solicitor to the Senior Court.

    Whilst May Maughan Deputy Official Official Solicitor finds the assistance afforded to Mr Lawrence
    by the police amusing, a Chief Constables Office directed the case to a Detective Chief Superintendant
    this enabled Mr Lawrence to recover May Maughans correspondence to the Law Society and the Law
    Societies internal files.

    The Law Societies internal files directs liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence
    with the Court of Protection.

    To be blunt the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) files identifies that SRA case worker Laura Markham
    and others within the SRA did not believe May Maughan the Deputy Official Solicitor submission neither
    did the SRA appointed investigating solicitor.

  176. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    Counsel written opinion supports the Law Society internal report and directs liability at the Official
    Solicitor for failing to register Mr Lawrence with the Court of Protection at the material time.

    In a video recorded with Barbara Hewson at Hardwicke Chambers, Ms Hewson accused the Official
    Solicitors office of several human rights violations against Mr Lawrence, this video was made available
    at the Cranfield Workshop in October 2011.

    Ms Hewson view was supported by other lawyers and expanded upon in the Journal of Biological Physics
    and Chemistry ISSN 1512-0856.

  177. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]

    16 April 2012
    Mr. Day, St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    Advised HHJ Simon Oliver of the following:

    FINAL ORDER OF D.J. FORTGANG IS NOT VALID AS IT HAS NOT BEEN SENT TO THE COURT OF PROTECTION.

    According to solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP Solicitors, my barrister Mr Day recieved an angery
    phone call from WBr HHJ Simon Oliver the next day and Mr Day withdrew from my case !!

    I was also told to pay £10,000

  178. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]
    ——————————————————————————–
    HM Procurator General,
    HAD HHJ SIMON OLIVER HELD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION
    IN 2012 HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT PERMISSION TO APPEAL UNDER PART V11 OF THE MENTAL
    HEALTH ACT 1983 IS NOT REQUIRED !! HE WOULD HAVE SAVED THE GOVERNMENT A SUM IN THE
    REGION OF £500,000 POUNDS.

    4 August 2005 NICHOLAS ALLEN 29 Bedford Row London WC1 4HE
    Counsel for the Official Solicitor
    Skeleton Argument 6)
    (a) it is not believed that Mr. Edmond has been authorized by the Court of Protection
    under Part V11 of the Mental Health Act 1983(FPR9.2(7)(b) para.15

    ———————————————————————————-
    Lord Justice Ward [2009] EWCA Civil 1122 Marco Pierre White –and- Withers LLP 29th October 2009
    Comment by Lord Justice Ward

    63. The Family Division’s practice to admit all relevant evidence in the search for truth or to impose
    sanctions where there has been improper conduct.

    67. Furthermore, it must always be remembered that solicitors are officers of the court and if they
    are shown to have done wrong they should face the judgment of the court. It is not conducive to the
    administration of justice that such claims are simply swept under the carpet. It is in the public interest
    that the bounds of proper conduct be clarified. Leonard Lawrence

  179. Let’s be clear on what is taking place in the courts. Criminals with law degrees are racketeering with other criminals, including transnational organised crime. It is taking place in all the courts, and Simon Oliver is not the only one involved.

    The original court documents illustrated in the following publication and the text illustrate exactly how these HIGH LEVEL AND VERY SERIOUS ORGANISED crimes are being committed, and deliberately corrupt process is being applied in the court itself IN THOUSANDS OF CASES for the purpose of stealing people’s assets – UNDER THE RADAR YET IN PLAIN SIGHT.

    https://www.lulu.com/shop/brad-meyer/the-forensics-of-legal-fraud-v1r3/paperback/product-15543775.html

    “Brace yourself and imagine that your are about to enter a British world that is operating outside the Rule of Law. Famed and honoured in prior centuries for sourcing Magna Carta, the United Kingdom is poised this century to become famous for housing systematic, intentional contravention of its own rules.

    Join one man’s journey along an audit trail of fraud, as he identifies forged documents and perjured statements leading to the bankrupting of his family and their ongoing financial arrest that continues to this day. Along the way, you’ll learn some of the red flags of fraud that your adversaries can use against you.

    If you are wealthy, these are especially crucial for you to know. If you are protecting the wealthy, then you need to raise your awareness of what’s going on around you. If you are, instead, a participant in the institutionalised process of asset stripping wealthy targets in England, then this book itself will be your red flag that the game is up and your days are numbered.”
    Brad Meyer, Author

    WHAT HAS ANY LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY COURTS – OR ANY COURT, OR SUCCESSIVE MINISTERS OF JUSTICE DONE ABOUT IT?

    MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHY HAVE THEY NOT DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT? i WILL LEAVE THAT TO YOUR IMAGINATION.

  180. Anyone who has a single doubt about the above version of events, should consider for a moment why the
    above named, senior legal professionals have not taken action to protect the integrity of their professional
    name and competency? (not a single one of them) After all personal brand is paramount in the service industry
    and for many of those named, this site appears on page one of a google search for their name.

    It’s not like they wouldn’t have the finances, time and professional ability to take action. So maybe they fear something else, like only proving Mr Lawrence’s case for him?

    There but for the grace of chance go all of us, when catastrophic failings of both the legal system and the
    diagnostic health system occur.

    May Justice find you soon Leonard.

  181. From a Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank

    If only all of the above were the whole story…

    Len lost his Pilot medical and could not continue flying – this was due to organophosphate poisoning
    due to a known problem with toxic additives use in aviation oils – Cases in Australia and the United States
    were settled long ago re this, but not in the UK.

    His wife Nicola started divorce proceedings (around 70% of those with Acquired Brain Injury are divorced
    by their spouse)

    Len’s was admitted to the Cygnet Healthcare Godden Clinic and was incorrectly diagnosed/medicated.
    Medication and incorrect treatment continued in the NHS for years to follow. Five Court of Court
    incapacitation certificates were issued but the legal advisers failed as was their legal duty to register
    them with the Court of Protection.

    His house was sold unlawfully without the Court of Protection consent – a matter which all legal advisers
    were aware should not be done and a derisory settlement made to Len with considerable adverse financial
    inferences made against him by a district judge – John Fortgang in Slough who should not of made any
    order as he was not appointed by the Court of Protection.

    Another Judge – Jones disqualified herself from any dealings in the matter but then continued to make
    judgements against her own order disqualifying herself.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield, Radcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors in Reading were reprimanded by the Law
    Society and the maximum compensation awarded to Len – but even this was derisory amount £600.

    Len was subsequently referred to Professor Gordon Turnbull a consultant to the Civil Aviation Authority
    who made a correct diagnosis, and Len got on the road to recovery – a very long one.

    Every legal party to this event has tried to suppress Len, including Simon Oliver and quite frankly one
    should consider they should all be held liable for Len’s substantial losses and compensation.

    The gravity of this matter is such that it needs attention in the highest court in the land. I would suggest
    that a most senior high court judge be appointed to review this case in conjunction with the attorney general

    Good luck Len not all freemasons are like Simon Oliver.

  182. Thank you for this. Even the Old Bailey will make no difference. It will be just as corrupt.

    What is happening in the UK is actually “crimes against humanity” There is absolutely no justice to be had. There is NO remedy to justice in the UK. Corrupt all the way through and the UK is on the brink of financial collapse according to Andrew Bailey of the Bank of England.

    Watch the rats leave the sinking ship after they are the ones who rammed a hole in the side of it for decades.

    Numerous judges are corrupt. The Metropolitan Police has a list of corrupt judges, compiled around the same time as Operation Tiberius. BUT THEN SO DO WE. They are working with organised crime.

    Regardless, if there are honest judges out there, they are obligated by law to speak up about what they know. Speak up now or we expose you next.

    We are reliably informed that judges around the world are studying this website. I don’t know of anyone who can say they have been treated fairly in the British courts. The devastation that corrupt judges, solicitors, and barristers have caused is beyond belief.

    Sorry Kenneth Clarke, but your dream of making the UK the litigation capitol of the universe is not going to happen. NOBODY will be bringing their cases to the UK courts by the time we have finished – unless some action is taken now against Simon Oliver and his cronies in the Ministry of Justice..

    All the time, the President of the Family Court and the Lord Chief Justice are keeping their heads down. Well, if they don’t lift them up and some take action, we will make sure their heads will roll before it is time to take the donkey to the church.

    Absolute total institutionalised corruption………………AND IT IS NOT JUST ONE,BUT THOUSANDS.

    The gig’s up.

  183. Well,

    They certainly picked on the wrong one

    Howlett-Bolton, if he didn’t know what a piece of snot oliver is, certainly does now.

    He also now knows that sometimes, “14 little people” have some interesting friends and acquaintances
    that can make life a little hot.

    Nice shot across the bows of the brotherhood; they now know your cannons are primed and if necessary,
    ready for a broadside.

  184. That these public servants continue to function ‘beyond authority’ for so long and cover each others’
    backs just goes to show how brave people like Leonard are. Fighting against all the odds, the truth will out.
    Stick with it Len, more good folk are becoming aware.

  185. Exactly. They have all acted IN COMMON PURPOSE to commit fraud, including Legal Aid fraud by the sound of it.

  187. Sir Jonathan Jones KCB QC HM Procurator General, Treasury Solicitor
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department

    Luke 8:17
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and
    come to light.

    [Like WBr HHJ Simon Oliver conducting Court of Protection hearings when he was not authorised]
    ——————————————————————————-
    St Philips Chambers Birmingham
    55 Temple Row,
    Birmingham B2 5LS,
    United Kingdom

    Counsel advice on Leonard Lawrence funded by The Legal Serviced Commission, Special Cases Unit.

    Mr. Lawrence had the protection of the Official Solicitor but was not registered as a protected party
    should be in the Court of Protection.

    Left financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order of sale

    Serious procedural error.
    ——————————————————————————–
    9 September 2010
    Mr Richard Anelay QC
    Deputy High Court Judge, Family Division,
    Head of Chambers
    1 Kings Bench Walk, Temple, London, EC4Y 7DB

    Richard Anelay QC writes:
    Barrister Dominic Brazil had informed Mr. Anelay QC that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient and
    subject to the Court of Protection when he (Dominic Brazil) had placed Hundreds of Thousands of
    Pounds in costs and adverse inferences upon Leonard Lawrence by not disclosing the Court of
    Protection Medical Certificates to the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————
    On the 16 April 2012, the above case came before Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver,
    (It is now known that WBr HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation)

    16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    THE JUDGE: Well it actually says so in the Offical Solicitors guide
    MR DAY: It does
    THE JUDGE: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————
    Eight years later and Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has still to comply with the instructions
    of Mrs Justice Pauffley and make the re-transferring order to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    The Barristers Chambers of Nicholas Frances QC and Stephen Cobb QC [now Mr Justice Nicholas Frances
    QC and Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC, Family Division] had both identified that I was a patient subject to
    the Court of Protection.
    ———————————————————————————–
    30 August 2012 WBr HHJ Simon Oliver falsely alleges that there is no evidence that barrister Simon
    Calhaem from the now-former Chambers of Nicholas Frances QC attended Reading Court Court and
    advised the court that my home had been sold without the Court of Protection authorisation. That
    evidenced was handed to the now-former Attorney General Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC.

    Leonard Lawrence

  188. Len

    “Once to every man and nation
    Comes the moment to decide,
    In the strife of truth and falsehood,
    For the good or evil side;”
    James Russell Lowell – As quoted by Rev. Martin Luther King

    “All truth goes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Then it is violently opposed.
    Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
    Arthur Schopenhauer 1788-1860, German philosopher who based his ethics on compassion)

    “It requires courage to utter truth; for the higher Truth lifts her voice, the louder will error
    scream, until its inarticulate sound is forever silenced in oblivion”.
    Mary Baker Eddy, Christian Science.

  189. You’ve got them Len!
    I don’t understand how so many people could have been hurt by the Official Solicitor, had their assests
    stolen away from them and yet they are allowed to continue this fraud and abuse against some of the most
    vulnerable people in our society. No one is above the Law. You’ve got them Len!

  190. Hi Len,

    Are you free to disclose an account of what happened when you met the Attorney General?
    Did you discuss Court of Protection issues or cabin poisoning or a bit of both?

    Is the AG aware of the scale of the frauds?

    No worries if you are unable to divulge

    R

  191. Anonymous says:
    June 24, 2020 at 8:36 pm
    Hi Len,
    Are you free to disclose an account of what happened when you met the Attorney General?
    Did you discuss Court of Protection issues or cabin poisoning or a bit of both?
    Is the AG aware of the scale of the frauds?
    No worries if you are unable to divulge
    R
    ————————————————————————–
    Dear R

    Over the years I have shaken hands with three Attorney General’s for England and Wales

    The first was Gareth Williams QC, Lord Williams of Mostyn
    [Gareth Williams QC had represented me in a matter with a police force in the 1990’s]

    The second Dominic Grieve QC
    [Dominic Grieve QC had written to a police force to investigate a matter of stolen documents,
    had this police force investigated I would not be in this situation now]

    The third Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC
    I am not allowed to divulge the names of who drove me to this meeting. I gave the Rt Hon Geoffery
    Cox QC a very brief summary and handed over copies of documents that the police are not allowed
    to view. I also gave the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC a copy of a document that HHJ Simon Oliver said
    that I could not produce, following a basement search at Reading County Court.

    I informed the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC of the bullying that I had been subjected to and like so many
    other victims having been failed by [some] within the Ministry of Justice. My former colleagues will
    now assist me to resolve matters.

    A later request was made to Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC for assistance on a specific piece of legislation.
    This was made available to me within a few days. The cost to resolve my case would cost less that
    £100.

    With some encouragement from the office of the Rt Hon Geoffery Cox QC in February 2020 a police
    force disclosed many documents that had been withheld from me.

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER Claimant-and -JAVED SHAIKH Case No: QB/2019/000194
    Javed Shaikh. Mr Shaikh the action taken against you by WBr. Simon Oliver and the Ministry of
    Justice has been closely followed to see what barristers chambers would be used, the name of the
    barrister, and what judges your case would be listed with. Some of those helping you are indeed
    Freemasons and former Freemasons, not everyone approves of WBro HHJ Simon Oliver.

    Who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the financing of this litigation against you?

    judges behaving badly – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER –
    This website has achieved more for the safeguarding of vulnerable persons than Multi-Agency
    Safeguarding Agencies, by bringing victims together. The is a pattern as to what is occurring.

    Now, why was I being told to agree to pay £10,000 following the hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver
    by solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP, Bristol, when I was financed by the Legal Services
    Commission and Mrs Justice Pauffey had instructed HH Simon Oliver to re-transfer my case to
    the Court of Appeal EIGHT YEARS AGO.

    There is something very specific about Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that very few people
    know. Also the continual loss of court recordings.

    Leonard Lawrence
    25 June 2020

  193. Louisa Lloyd-Jones
    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team

    Dear Ms Lloyd Jones

    1. Would you please advise who within the Ministry of Justice has authorised the financing of this
    litigation against Mr Javed Sheikh?

    2. Could you advise whether The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice Sir Richard Heaton has
    knowledge of these proceedings?

    3. Why was I not informed of the specific allegations that Honour Judge Simon Oliver had made
    against me (Leonard Lawrence) in paragraphs 52 and 53 of Mr Justice Julian Knowles Approved
    Judgement, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone seeking summary judgement?

    4. Whilst the Chief Executive of Matrix Chambers, Ms Homes alleges that Mr Silverstone is instructed
    on behalf of the Claimant, to whom he owes professional obligations, with respect both the Claimant
    [HHJ Simon Oliver] and barrister Benjamin Silverstone have a much higher duty not to knowingly
    mislead the court.

    5. Finally, I invite my Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver to withdraw all false allegations made
    against me in his statement and barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, to inform the
    court accordingly.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  194. Msg for Len….
    Helen is trying to contact you from Helston…(Meeting in London)…for some reason I have the wrong email address!!!

    Can someone let him know I’m trying to make contact please..

    Regards
    Helen

  195. pfd.office@judiciary.uk

    Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division

    RE: COURT OF PROTECTION READING

    We have located a court transcript of the hearing on the 16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver

    HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation until the 7 October 2015

    HHJ SIMON OLIVER WAS HOLDING FIVE ‘ LIVE’ COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATES,

    The transcript shines a bright light on what has been occurring at behind closed doors at Reading
    County Court with the Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver between 2012 and October 2015 at
    Reading County Court and HHJ Simon Oliver assessment of the role of the Court of Protection.

    The barrister Dominic Brazil had in September 2010 already admitted to a Deputy High Court Family
    Judge that I was a Court of Protection Patient. There is no reference of this by barrister Dominic Brazil.
    However, HHJ Simon Oliver knew.

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    THE JUDGE: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    MR DAY: It does.
    THE JUDGE: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the COP
    MR DAY: It does.

    HHJ Simon Oliver was of the belief that any judge could excise Court of Protection authorisation
    and suggest that the role of the Court of Protection as a rubber-stamping process.

    MR DAY: So that is your rubber stamping. I think that was the word.

    Barrister Dominic Brazil 1KBW fee for the one-hour hearing was £10,000 [ten thousand pounds]

    In August 2019 Thames Valley Police, [coinciding with the retirement of Detective Superintendent
    Gillian Wootton, Head of Specialist Operations and Covert Policing] released documents to me
    identify that barrister Dominic Brazil 1KBW instructing solicitors BP Collins Solicitor had obtained
    a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, that solicitor Graeme S. Fraser had denied the existence of.

    Leonard Lawrence

    ps Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division
    Having been told by the Court of Protection he did not hold a Court of Protection nomination. HHJ
    Simon Oliver then proceed to deliver a Court of Protection Judgement.

    pps The transcripts are available of other cases

    ———————————————————————————
    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  196. Hi Len,
    copying wording to you from a consultation paper Land Registry

    Form RR (Deputy appointed under section 16 of the Mental Capacity Act – solely owned property) RESTRICTION:
    No disposition during the lifetime of [name of person who lacks capacity] of the [registered estate] [registered
    charge dated [date]] is to be completed by registration unless made pursuant to an order of the court under the
    Mental Capacity Act 2005. Form SS (Trustee appointed in place of a person who lacks capacity – jointly owned property) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the [registered estate] [registered charge dated [date]] made during
    the lifetime of [name of person who lacks capacity] is to be completed by registration without the written
    consent of the Court of Protection.

  198. Dear judges behaving badly

    WHY DOES BERKSHIRE FREMASONARY CONTINUAL TO PROMOTE WBR HHJ SIMON OLIVER AS
    THE FACE OF FREEMASONRY IN 2020?

    HHJ Oliver’s actions in the Queens Bench Division is only going to fuel the determination of his
    victims and pull more and more people into this. The Judicial Office and Ministry of Justice
    should have invited him to retire and then set about resolving the trail of destruction that he
    has caused to them and their families. BUT THEY WON’T. His victims have nothing to lose.

    11 February 2013 WBr HHJ Simon Oliver was told by Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley to retransfer
    my case to the Court of Appeal. Over 7 years now and I am still waiting for the retransferring
    order to be made.

    When WBr. HHJ Simon Oliver takes action in the Queens Bench Division, against a victim of
    abuse he obtains summary judgement within months !!

    Over 7 years now and I am still waiting for the retransferring order. The difficulty HHJ Simon
    Oliver has to overcome is how to explain why he was conducting Court of Protection cases at
    Reading County Court when he was not authorised to do so over a four year period.

    The Crown Prosecution Service, review of my case has still to be published, their request that I
    visited has still to be actioned. Maybe I should make the statement on this website.

    Starting with the former Chambers of Mr Justice Stephen Cobb QC:
    Barrister Caroline Wilbourne. Incapable of legal discussions with the Official Solicitor of any
    solicitor instructed by.

    Thereafter the former Chambers of Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC:
    Barrister Simon Calhaem informing Reading County Court that the Official Solicitor had not
    agreed the sale of my home.

    Leonard Lawrence

  199. Hello Len
    Every door has been slammed in your face as those in authority close rank and deny you the open channels
    which you are entitled to pursue by law. But your resilience and fortitude are gaining momentum my friend
    and once you crack open that chamber of horrors you will lift the lid on an avalanche of corruption from many
    who somehow assumed they were above the law……they will doubtless scarper like a pack of rats.
    D..

  200. Leonard
    From a genuine and truthful Police Officer :-
    I attended a function at the Freemasons’ Hall, and as I entered I saw a detective chief inspector who had served
    with me and was a friend of Phil Cuthbert’s. He was with some other police officers, he shook his head at me and openly made a Masonic sign, indicating that I had betrayed Freemasonry. I was disappointed with his behaviour,
    I had not let the Craft down, it was the crooks who had done that. I was abiding by the oath that I took as a police officer and obviously, to him, that was not acceptable if it involved the Craft. It was this incident that was the final straw for me. I had witnessed obnoxious behaviour by senior and junior police officers, graffiti in police stations, personal threats, intimidation of my wife and friends and ostracism from many colleagues. Now I had Freemasons
    in Freemasons’ Hall publicly denouncing me. I resigned from the Freemasons and now firmly hold the belief that
    the Police Service and Freemasonry should not be allowed to mix.

  202. The issues we investigate are:

    how corruption (judicial and political) has been building over decades;
    how the Justice System and Judiciaries are actually working and performing;
    what is meant by the secret courts, gag orders etc;
    how appeal courts actually work and why should there be a need for a Supreme Court when very few cases make their way there;
    why so many incompetent judges who are ready to abuse their judicial position to protect other judges and colleagues are being appointed and promoted to make money out of the system;
    what is the Government’s interest in using the Justice System to promote its political agenda; and
    why judicial impeachment is necessary to protect the rights of the people.

    We are grateful to the significant and gross mistakes, grandiose and delusional nature, and clear incompetence of Lord Wilson of Culworth, Supreme Court Judge since May 2011. His former colleague Lord Dyson (former Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Division, and former Supreme Court Judge) was forced into early retirement in 2016 with the push from our evidence as sent by correspondence to Her Majesty the Queen.

    Lord Wilson of Culworth was a very poor and wrong choice for a Judge at all court levels. Lord Dyson was an embarrassment to the Judiciary and the first Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Division to be forced to resign by a member of the public. He was the 96th Master of the Rolls.

    Lord Wilson of Culworth is officially known as the most corrupt judge of the 21st Century. His considerable unethical and unlawful involvement in cases not in his court, have caused judges to leave the Judicial System and others are about the leave on their own or be impeached.

    Some of the judges who have been found to have abused their ‘judicial power’ are His Honour Judge Parkes QC (Queen’s Bench and disabled – making him an easy target for other judges to exercise their influence on him), Lady Justice Macur (Court of Appeal and a judge with many hats whose behaviour is very dishonest), Lord Justice Sales (Court of Appeal and a subordinate judge), Her Honour Judge McGowan (Tribunal Judge and puppet Judge for other Judges and Chambers), Lord Justice Ryder (Court of Appeal and President of the Tribunals enjoying a pretend aristocratic life, wearing many hats to satisfy all and lacking knowledge of how the justice system actually is supposed to work),

    Lord Justice McFarlane (Court of Appeal, supporter/adviser/judge of the Church and adviser/supporter of his Wife’s career who pretends to be important and from an aristocratic background only to gain entry in the Royal Family and mislead them), and let’s not forget the ultimate bad judge who caused the most embarrassment to the Justice System and the Conservative Government – the ‘dyslexic and most dishonest’ judge of all times and very good friend of Lord Justice McFarlane – Lady Justice Eleanor King (Court of Appeal and a judge who lied to the Ministry of Justice on her judicial application; cannot read and write properly given her disability and one who also has been holding other employment while acting as a full-time judge contrary to her employment terms and conditions) who was appointed on an application only basis and not on merit.

    We are internationally recognised for our considerable difficult and important cases.

    There’s more…………….

    CHECK OUT THIS WEBSITE IN ITS ENTIRETY: https://web.archive.org/web/20190126231024/http://www.divorceandthecity.co.uk/

  203. Had it been true that Mr. Sheikh threatened Oliver with anthrax like he said, Oliver would have gone to police, and they would have arrested and charged Sheikh. The second issue is that Judge Knowles and Ben Silverstone are connected to the same chambers, which is not allowed.

    Knowles never asked to see the evidence of the anthrax, nor was it offered in the court room. So what on earth kind of judge is Knowles?

    So he is obviously dishonest.

    One person postingon this website has said that Oliver had asked him to put two cheques through his business, totalling 250K pounds, in exchange for cash. I would say this is money laundering.

    All these people talking about Oliver don’t appear to know each other.

    No wonder Oliver wants this website taken down. Too many people know things that could put him behind bars for a very long time.

  204. Has the dyslexic judge Eleanor King been passing Judgments based on a routine basis rather than on a case by case basis?

    Ministry of Justice has no policies in place to help judges with disabilities or take action against those judges who mislead the Ministry only to make a financial and otherwise (privileges) benefits from their judicial role.

    Stay with us for our next story how this dyslexic judge continues to mislead the Ministry of Justice as she holds another job, under her maiden name, besides being a full time judge, under her married name, at the Court of Appeal. She works for a company who pursues “claims against certain third parties in respect of various contractual breaches”. Certain members of the company have been formally charged for criminal activities and the case will be heard this year. Is Eleanor Warwick Hamilton, known as Eleanor King LJ, one of the criminally charged individuals as she has been with the company since 6 April 2006 (its establishment in January 2006)?

    FULL STORY HERE: https://web.archive.org/web/20190515105823/http://www.divorceandthecity.co.uk/lady-justice-eleanor-kings-disability-dyslexia-identified-by-bbc-news-reporting-today/

    What a con artist. Who would trust any judgment she has ever made?

  205. We should be grateful to Simon Oliver. Single handedly, is is bringing down the whole corrupt judiciary. The Queen will be pleased. We are the 99%. We are many. They are few.

  207. I read some documents and heard some information that Simon Oliver is committing Mr Shaikh to prison on the 27th of July 2020 in the high court which will be heard by justice Matthew Nicklin. Matrix chambers, the government legal department, Ben Silverstone or Simon Oliver have not provided any evidence for their case but all that is provided is a Simon Oliver’s affidavit which makes an allegation and we all know an allegation is not evidence. I would advise Mr Shaikh not bother turning up because it seems they are trying to bring harm to him by using a kangaroo court. I find it very interesting that during covid-19 pandemic that the high court is open for committal! to date, Simon Oliver has avoided the jury! I wonder why he is avoiding the jury? Maybe because he knows that a jury would not accept the same evidence and only one of his friends in the High court will
    All in all, just a very sad court case again where the beneficiary is going to be a judge. I think if Mr Shaikh is committed then we should all riot at Oliver’s
    Kind regards

  208. Len didn’t ask for these problems; they were foisted on him by unscrupulous people who knew that they were doing wrong. How many more people are affected thus? How many does Len Lawrence represent? Remember that OPs are damaging the whole population – children and foetuses included. These are our families that are being damaged. Keep up the good work, Len.

  209. Hi Len

    Solicitor Graeme Fraser

    Fraud Act 2006
    CHAPTER 35
    CONTENTS
    Fraud

    1 Fraud
    2 Fraud by false representation
    3 Fraud by failing to disclose information
    4 Fraud by abuse of position

  210. Dear judges behaving badly,

    Mr Justice Moor predetermined judgement

    Here is the predetermined Moor judgement he handed down on the last day of the final hearing after a 4 week trial to discredit me and my case in front of a room full of global media in which he handed the judgement to the media as well.

    Throughout the four week trial Moor ignored most of my evidence and the law, and put reporting restrictions on the media so they could not tell the truth regarding my evidence that was ignored throughout the four week trial. Where the lawyers were hiding behind legal privilege….

    Best Michelle

    https://www.docdroid.net/uKXXArh/3637-pdf

  211. Dear Len,

    I have not yet heard the outcome of the police investigation into criminality by HHJ Simon Oliver.
    I will let you know as soon as I do hear.

    Could you forward this e-mail to the Attorney General’s Office.

    The MOJ have been less than forthcoming on FOIA requests!

    I am trying to discover if Oliver’s claims in 2014 hold any veracity.

    Did Justice Singh (now Rabinder Singh) and another unnamed Court of Appeal Judge appoint him as:

    1. A section 9 Deputy High Court Judge of the Queen’s Bench Division.
    2. President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    3 Did Justice Singh have the Civil Procedure Rules changed so that he could hear and grant extended civil
    restraint orders, as a designated family law judge.

    There does not appear to be any truth in this but I wish to make sure.
    It is, also, only fair to Rabinder Singh to allow him the opportunity to refute the claims.

    There are parallels with your case here; Oliver made court orders which could only be made by the
    Court of Protection.

    Regards

  212. judges behaving badly
    07 December 2018

    Eleven magistrates, two court judges and four tribunal judges had to be removed from office last year for misconduct, according to the annual Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) report.

    Of these dismissals, 12 were serious enough to be dealt with under the summary process, where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Chief Justice can remove an office holder without further investigation due to circumstances such as a criminal conviction, bankruptcy or failure to meet sitting requirements without reasonable excuse.

    Formal reprimands were given to five magistrates, two court judges, one tribunal judge and one coroner.

    In total, 39 judges were subject to disciplinary action last year, compared to 42 in the previous year. The JCIO received roughly the same number of complaints as last year, 2,147 to 2,126 the previous year. The JCIO report covers 23,000 full or part-time judges.

    Many members of the public continue to mistake the JCIO as an alternative means of appeal, submitting complaints about judicial decisions and case management, the report said.

    The JCIO’s performance in terms of meeting its deadlines for responding to complaints suffered last year due to ‘significant staffing shortages’.

    It met its aim of responding to complaints within two days in only 89% of cases, having set a target of doing so in 95% of cases; and of issuing a substantive response within 15 working days in only 66% of cases, somewhat short of its target of doing so in 85% of cases. It attributed this drop in performance to ‘significant staffing shortages’.

    The Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman upheld or partially upheld seven complaints about the JCIO’s handling of complaints (less than 1% of the JCIO’s overall caseload).

    https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/judges-behaving-badly-2

  213. http://www.gov.uk

    “The Attorney General has a duty to ensure that the Queen’s ministers who act in her name, or purport to act in her name, do act lawfully because it is his duty to help to secure the rule of law, the principal requirement of which is that the government itself acts lawfully.” (Lord Mayhew of Twysden)

    “…(Attorney General has) a role to play in Parliament, in government, in assisting the courts, and in defending the rule of law…It is only in a system of government where the rule of law is respected that the law is truly legitimate, and legitimacy is the essence of the authority of a democratic government…Today the authority and sovereignty of a democratic Parliament is supported and legitimised daily by the work of our courts.” (Dominic Grieve QC MP, former Attorney General)

    …“The Attorney General is also the head of the Government Legal Service”…”a member of key Cabinet Committees at which rule of law issues may arise (and on which the Lord Chancellor does not sit). These include the Parliamentary Business and Legislation Committee and the National Security Council. These are important avenues through which potential rule of law issues can be noted and raised at an early stage. In addition, the Attorney General scrutinises all Government bills for their compliance with human rights law and legal propriety.”…(House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution 6th Report of Session 2014–15)

    __________

    The Attorney General for England and Wales is the chief legal adviser of the Crown in England and Wales, and a member of the UK Government. The Attorney General provides legal advice to the Government of the day. By convention, and unlike the papers of other ministers, this legal advice is available to subsequent governments… The Attorney General oversees the small Attorney General’s Office and also has responsibility for the Government Legal Department, which is headed by the Treasury Solicitor. When a Government Department has no internal legal capacity, the Government Legal Department provides it, instructing independent counsel where necessary. The Attorney General is a barrister and can appear in court in person, though in practice he/she rarely does so, and then only in cases of outstanding national importance. In those cases the Government Legal Department provides his back-up. The Attorney General also has supervisory powers over prosecutions, including those mounted by the Crown Prosecution Service, headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions; the Serious Fraud Office; and the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. The Attorney General has public interest functions, being, for example, the trustee of default where a sole trustee has died, and can also take cases to the Supreme Court where points of general legal importance need to be settled. The Attorney General is assisted by the Solicitor General for England and Wales, currently Robert Buckland. Under the Law Officers Act 1997, the Solicitor General may do anything on behalf of, or in the place of, the Attorney General, and vice versa. Under the Government of Wales Act 2006, the Counsel General for Wales is the chief legal adviser to, and a member of, the Welsh Government. (Wikipedia)

  215. Mr Grieve (Dominic Grieve, MP, former Attorney General) stressed that Government lawyers were not, however, “spies in government departments telling me when ministerial colleagues might be on the point of going off the rails”. With only a small number of staff in the Attorney General’s Office, the Law Officers are “certainly not in a position to be overseers of the rule of law”. Another limit on the Attorney General’s capacity to be a guardian of the rule of law is that he or she, although of cabinet rank, is not a full member of the Cabinet. In recent years it has become standard practice for the Attorney General to attend all Cabinet meetings, but unlike the Lord Chancellor they do so at the invitation of the Prime Minister, not as of right. Moreover, as the Government’s legal adviser rather than a minister (as Lady Scotland described it “in government but not of government”), the Attorney General may be privy to less of the policy discussions in which rule of law issues could arise…..With the post-reform Lord Chancellors playing a more limited and reactive guardianship role, the Law Officers have become ever more important in this respect. Although the Law Officers are not, as Mr Grieve told us, in a position to oversee the rule of law more generally across government, they do have a significant role supporting the Lord Chancellor in his duty to do so. This includes alerting the Lord Chancellor to potential rule of law issues, and working with him or her in Cabinet in uphold the rule of law, including defending judicial independence. As Lord Falconer told us: “the Attorney and the Lord Chancellor acting together are quite a powerful force in government.” (House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution 6th Report of Session 2014–15)

  217. Len Lawrence
    seems to me that the legal system is just one massive fraud designed to enrich the legal profession….
    As Action Fraud sad “These people are obviously very well protected”
    Sadly when the Fraud Act 2006 was released there were apparently no powers given for enforcement – wonder why?

  218. One judicial weapon that must be dismantled is the use of restraint orders at a judge’s discretion – it’s completely arbitrary.

  219. Captain Lawrence

    necesse est ab aliqua

    What was done to you was not a mistake, it was planned and well-orchestrated at the time by a lawyers,
    masterminded by the barrister Dominic Brazil. Stephens Road Chambers, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE
    WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    necesse est ab aliqua

  220. The Rule of Law

    How can the rule of law be upheld when there are so many problems with the Judiciaries and the Secret Courts?

    Judicial Incompetence, Conflict of Interest, Unethical Judicial Appointments, Unfair Trials, Lack of Court Support, Financial Extortion, Impractical Orders, Lack of Access to Justice…are all major problems for United Kingdom.

    Such issues must urgently be addressed by the Government and rectified to uphold and promote the people’s highly marketed and promoted democratic rights by the State. The fundamental principle of the UK constitution, for a free and fair society, is found in the Magna Carta dating back to 1215. Yet Judges ignore such rights in order to promote the Government’s agenda and their own financial interest of making money out of the system.

    Government’s agenda is Domestic Abuse and the Judges protect those who commit domestic abuse if they are represented by counsel who they trust and depend on for future benefits. It is encouraged, promoted and favoured by the Judges and Abusers who together contribute to the Government’s plans and policies.

  221. The judicial crimes are being committed in Her Majesty’s courts. Surely the Queen cannot plead ignorance of this fact?

  222. Anonymous says:
    June 28, 2020 at 5:45 pm

    Surely the Queen cannot plead ignorance of this fact?

    Her Majesty’s courts are also putting thousands of male and female veterans, Army Navy and RAF
    on to the streets like myself.

    13% [maybe more] of Her Majesty’s Category A and Category B Training Prisons are occupied by
    veterans, including those with PTSD like Corprol Jimmy Johnston

  223. A significant portion of NHS staff are also in prison because of false allegations made by the judiciary including Simon Oliver. The army veterans fight for our country and our medical professionals fight in our hospitals to keep us safe and our judiciary do injustices against us. I wonder in Justice Nicklin is already using a predetermined decision? We know that justice Julian Knowles did.

  224. The Central Family Court.

    To: Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    Another one of your female victims contacted me today. In addition to the mother that contacted
    me last week, who’s children and home you had also taken.

    Again the name of solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors has surfaced.
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors was acquired by Clifton Ingram solicitors around 2014.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield
    Sarah Benfield is a Family & Divorce solicitor based in Clifton Ingram’s Solicitors,
    County House, 17 Friar Street, Reading, Berkshire RG1 1DB United Kingdom
    sarahbenfield@cliftoningram.co.uk

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield has a remarkable history:

    On 3 July 2014 The Master’s Support Unit, Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice,
    disclosure barrister Caroline Willbourne, 1 Garden Court Chambers, report on Mr. Lawrence.
    “Incapable of legal discussion and understanding with the Official Solicitor of any solicitor
    instructed by him from November 2004 and at the time of the report 14 September 2005”

    Knowing that I was a patient subject to the Court of Protection, Sarah Benfield obtained my
    signature on Legal Aid Forms, without the knowledge of the Court of Protection. Thereafter,
    solicitor Sarah Benfield went on a revenue gathering exercise of almost £14,000. She has never
    returned this money that was stolen from me.

    In his judgment dated 30 Augst 2012, my Worshipful Brother, HHJ Simon Oliver was entirely
    satisfied by solicitor Sarah Benfield’s conduct. The Law Society was not! They instructed
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors to pay the maximum compensation for Sarah Benfield’s
    actions, £600 !!

    Leonard Lawrence
    cc

    Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton. Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons.

    Grand Master HRH THE DUKE OF KENT KG, United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Pro Grand Master PETER LOWNDES of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Deputy Grand Master JONATHAN SPENCE of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    Assistant Grand Master SIR DAVID WOOTTON United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    GEOFFREY DEARING President of the Board of General Purposes UGLE

  225. As early as 2004 District Judges in the Thames Valley Police Area have been conducting Court
    of Protection hearings, without authorisation, including those listed below.

    19 January 2009 Court of Protection to Mr. Lawrence
    The following judges at Slough County Court have not and currently do not hold a nomination of
    the Court of Protection
    DJ Fortgang
    DJ Jones
    DJ Devlin

    Please also be advised that to date the Court of Protection has received no application from any
    person or body.

  226. cfc.courtorders@Justice.gov.uk

    To: The Central Family Court.
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    WBRo Simon,

    The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.

    All of the files, documents and emails that I was never meant to see have been recovered for me!!

    Barristers Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk, claiming fees of £10,000 per hour in your court!!
    Solicitor Susan Andrews claiming fees of £4000 for writing two letters !!

    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————
    LNF41919/DM1
    Mrs. Motteram & Mrs. Ballard, Divisional Managers, Official Solicitors Office letter to Dr. Royds at
    Cygnet Healthcare Godden Green.

    The Official Solicitor is not authorized to make financial decisions on Mr. Lawrence’s behalf.

    I should be grateful therefore if you would consider the enclosed Court of Protection Certificate and
    complete and return it to me if you consider that Mr. Lawrence is incapable of managing and
    administration his financial affairs.

    (The following notes accompanied the Court of Protection CP3 sent to Dr. Royds by the Official
    Solicitors Office)

    NOTES
    Please read these notes before completing the medical certificate.
    Please note when the medical certificate has been completed its contents will be confidential to the
    Court and the Public Guardianship Office and those authorized by the Court or the Public Guardianship
    Office to see it.

  227. cfc.courtorders@Justice.gov.uk

    To: The Central Family Court.
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver

    THERE COULD BE THOUSANDS OF CASES LIKE MINE IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA!

    3 February 2005

    Official Solicitor to the Senior Practitioner Calcot Medical Centre.

    The Official Solicitor already acts for Mr. Lawrence in his divorce proceedings.

    Mr. Lawrence has assets, and the Official Solicitor needs to know whether he is capable of managing
    his financial affairs, or be vulnerable to exploitation from some unscrupulous person. Another reason
    is that Mr. Lawrence may need to provide funding for the divorce proceedings if he is not eligible for
    public funding. This can only be secured with authority from the Court of Protection.

    Doctors not told Mr. Lawrence was not eligible for public funding, had already been certified under
    Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 on 23/11/04.

    That a Court of Protection Medical Certificate was issued on the 27/1/05 and Mr. Lawrence signature
    had already been obtained on public funding forms by solicitor Sarah Benfield under instruction from
    solicitor Helen Clift Official Solicitors office.

    After a medical with two doctors at Calcot Medical Centre, the doctors refuse to issue a Court of Protection
    CP3 to the Official Solicitors office.

    Calcot Medical Centre identified as obstructive by the Official Solicitor’s office.

    Leonard Lawrence

  228. Suella Braverman MP
    [now serving as Attorney General for England and Wales]

    Quote

    We need a radical plan to reform family justice

    One of those injustices lies in our antiquated family justice system.

  229. Solicitor Sarah Benfield

    Sarah Benfield is a Family & Divorce solicitor based in Clifton Ingram’s Solicitors,
    County House, 17 Friar Street, Reading, Berkshire RG1 1DB United Kingdom
    sarahbenfield@cliftoningram.co.uk

    Again the name of solicitor Sarah Benfield, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors has surfaced.
    Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors was acquired by Clifton Ingram solicitors around 2014.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield having obtained my signature on legal aid forms, without Court of Protection
    authorisation, thereafter she went on a revenue gathering exercise generating legal fees of £13,866
    without the knowledge of the Court of Protection.

    Leonard Lawrence

  230. Diary Manager to the Permanent Secretary Jacee.Daley@justice.gov.uk

    SIR RICHARD HEATON, PERMANENT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

    WHY WOULD THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE BE FINANCING HHJ SIMON OLIVER’S CIVIL ACTION
    IN THE QUEENS BENCH DIVISION, [WITH LEGAL COSTS NOW AROUND £50,000] TO TAKEDOWN
    THIS WEBSITE?

    THE MONIES WOULD BE MORE PRODUCTIVITY SPENT, INVESTIGATING HOW MANY COURT OF
    PROTECTION CASES HHJ SIMON OLIVER HEARD AT READING COUNTY COURT, BETWEEN 2011 AND
    THE 6 OCTOBER 2015. WHEN HE DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION.

    ——————————————————————————
    Judicial Office for England & Wales, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    Our Reference: [104182] 31 March 2016

    His Honour Judge Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015.

    —————————————————————————–

    16 April 2012. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    HHJ Simon Oliver held four Court of Protection Certificates

    Case: Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938

    HHJ Simon Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?

    Barrister Dorian Day: It does.

    HHJ Simon Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    Barrister Dorian Day: Yes

    ——————————————————————————
    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600
    Email: courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

  231. It’s because the nasty little Richard Heaton wants to keep his dirty little secrets just that, completely secret! Mr Heaton has a long fight on his hands. As our friends in the US Navy say, IT WILL BE A COLD DAY IN HELL BEFORE THIS SITE EVER COME DOWN!

    And we must also say, if Sheikh is commited, we have plans reserved for Oliver. But we won’t say it here.

  233. If Heaton is on a hit list, this will not be the reason for it.

    Demob happy? MoJ chief recounts financial mess of Grayling era

    By John Hyde 30 June 2020

    The outgoing top civil servant at the Ministry of Justice has admitted the department was previously hamstrung by ‘ambitious and unrealistic’ savings targets which left it begging the Treasury for handouts.

    Sir Richard Heaton said the department was over-optimistic about the receipts it would bring in when he became permanent secretary in 2015. As a result, it was forced to repeatedly ask for help to meet funding gaps.

    Heaton has been rumoured to be on the hitlist for the government’s so-called ‘war with Whitehall’, following this week’s announcement that cabinet secretary Sir Mark Sedwill is stepping down this year.

    Appearing yesterday before the House of Commons public accounts committee, Heaton confirmed that his five-year tenure ends in August but said that talk of his departure was ‘at the moment speculation’.

    Whether he is being retained or not, Heaton was notably candid during his submissions to the committee about the problems experienced under Chris Grayling, who was appointed justice secretary in 2012.

    The consequences of Grayling’s reforms came to a head in 2015, Heaton said. ‘What went wrong was the 2015 spending settlement, an agreement between my department and the Treasury. We are both to blame. Resource spending was vastly under-cooked in that 2015 settlement – the expectations of income receipts were unrealistic and the expectation we would drive money out of the legal aid system was unrealistic.

    ‘It repeatedly became clear that the whole of the 2015 spending settlement was insecure. From that moment onwards we had to be hand in hand with the Treasury every step of the way. They were having to bail us out by increasing out main estimates and increasing our supplementary estimates. Twice a year we had to go cap in hand to the Treasury and it was not a great position for the department to be in.’

    Heaton said the department was now in a more sustainable position and that the 2019 settlement had provided the money to ‘broadly speaking keep the lights on’.

    The 2015 spending review pledged an extra £1.3bn in capital investment to transform the prison estate to better support rehabilitation, and £700m to spend in the courts and tribunals system.

    But it also required savings to the department’s administrative budget of 50% by 2019/20 and overall resource savings of 15% over the same period. Non-capital resources were to be reduced from £6.2bn to £5.6bn over five years.

    The Treasury was forced to offer additional funding to plug the gap between the original 2019/20 estimate in the 2015 spending review and the 2019/20 budget. This gap included a £324m shortfall in fee income and provisions for fees that were incorrectly charged, as well as other over-estimates about the savings that could be made.

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/demob-happy-moj-chief-recounts-financial-mess-of-grayling-era/5104818.article

    So long, Ricky! We hope you get what you deserve.

  234. Mr Heaton has always been known to lie. The reason his department were living on handouts was because he spent most of the budget protecting crooked judges like Simon Oliver by doing private litigation in the high court with predetermined outcomes. The rest of the money was spent covering up abuse in South London care homes which he is known to actively be involved in

  235. UNDER CONSTRUCTION

    THE LEONARD LAWRENCE STORY

    LAWYERS BEHAVING BADLY

    Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study), Basel, Switzerland

    Dr. Graham C. Holt
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220): “At this point the tenor of the presentation
    changed dramatically from calm, logic science to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence….
    His story was one of costly legal battles to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and
    that he was not mentally unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession,
    who lacked knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the
    legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in their reluctance
    to tackle those culpable.”

    THE LEONARD LAWRENCE STORY

    Leave a comment

    Hospital Medical Director
    Report reference: Leonard Lawrence
    He was then medicated to the extent that he lost mental capacity. During the period the Official Solicitor
    of the Supreme Court acted as his Guardian ad Litem, three Court of Protection medical certificates (CP3s)
    had been obtained but not registered with the Court of Protection. He was, therefore, for nearly 18 months
    regarded as a mentally ill patient without access to the Court of Protection. During this time considerable
    amounts of his assets went missing.

    Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (209-215)
    In the Lawrence case there appears to be sound grounds for legal action and significant compensation
    claims for mistreatment and false diagnoses and an appalling failure of the duty of care

    Commander Royal Navy
    Dear Len,
    A cover up by Police, Lawyers and all and sundry.
    NEVER GIVE IN, but stand resolute and strong in bringing down these corrupt and deceitful persons who
    were responsible for all your hurt and pain too. Rest assured we are alongside you in exposing this unlawful
    and criminal activity.

  237. TO WHOEVER CONSTRUCTED THE WEBSITE BELOW, A BIG THANK YOU

    Is this the website https://lawyersbehavingbadly.wordpress.com

    DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID, IT DOES NOT BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION

    HOW MANY COURT OF PROTECTION CASES WBro HHJ SIMON OLIVER HEARD AT READING COUNTY
    COURT BETWEEN 2011 AND OCTOBER 2015, WHEN HE DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION
    AUTHORISATION, REMAINS UNKNOWN AT THIS PRESENT TIME.

    HUNDREDS? MAYBE EVEN A THOUSAND COURT OF PROTECTION CASES?

    WITH BARRISTER DOMINIC BRAZIL, 1 KINGS BENCH WALK CHAMBERS, CLAIMING A FEE OF £10,000
    FOR A ONE HOUR HEARING BEFORE HHJ SIMON OLIVER ON THE 16 APRIL 2012. SOLICITOR SUSAN
    ANDREWS, BP COLLINS SOLICITORS, CLAIMING £4000 FOR WRITING JUST TWO LETTERS, THE
    SUMS OF MONIES STOLEN FROM VULNERABLE PERSONS COULD BE IN THE TENS OF MILLIONS,
    POSSIBLY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF POUNDS.

    THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE HAS KNOW THAT SINCE 2004 COURT OF PROTECTION HEARINGS HAD
    BEEN TAKING PLACE IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA BY JUDGE THAT WERE NOT AUTHORISED
    TO HEAR COURT OF PROTECTION THESE CASES.

    FORMER READING SOLICITOR, HELEN MARY CLIFT, NOW A SOLICITOR WITH GOVERNMENT LEGAL
    SERVICES, WORKING WITHIN THE OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR TO THE SENIOR COURT, WAS
    OF THE BELIEF THAT SHE WAS UNTOUCHABLE.

    THE EXISTENCE OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATES, USED BY HELEN MARY
    CLIFT IN MY CASE WERE NOT KNOWN TO EITHER THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN OR THE
    COURT OF PROTECTION. SOME ARE PLAIN A4 PAPER WITH THE WORDS COURT OF PROTECTION
    TYPED ON TO THE PAPER.

    HOWEVER, THERE IS A EVEN DARKER SIDE TO WHAT HAS BEEN OCCURING INVOLVING PARENTS
    AND CHILDREN.

    Leonard Lawrence

  238. Can someone please check whether Dr Shaikh is ok? It must be very traumatic for the gentleman with false anthrax attack claims and now committal hearings. I wouldnt want a hospital doctor to go to prison because our corrupt Ministry of Justice is more interested in protecting Simon Oliver then the public.
    Kindest regards

  239. Power of attorney usage continues to rise

    By Imogen Tew

    The number of people signing over financial control has continued to rise in 2020, with more than 200,000 powers of attorney submitted in the first quarter of the year.

    Data from the Ministry of Justice showed 239,647 powers of attorney were received in January to March 2020 — up 5 per cent from the same quarter last year.

    Almost all the applications were for lasting powers of attorney (99 per cent) while enduring powers of attorney made up the other 1 per cent.

    According to the MoJ, the rate of increase in powers of attorney became sharper in 2015 when there was more publicity around the agreements and the government introduced online forms, making the process more simple and faster to use.

    Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, said: “LPA applications have become progressively more popular over the last decade, and we could reach close to a million new applications per year at the current rate.

    “An LPA gives people peace of mind. This can be really important as individuals may experience distress and even family conflict if they’re trying to make complex choices about their financial and health needs at a time when they are grappling with the deterioration of their mental faculties.”

    Ms Griffin said it was possible the coronavirus crisis may have curtailed the number of people applying for a LPA in Q2 of 2020 given the requirements around wet signatures being hard to meet due to social distancing rules.

    She added: “If there is a decline as a result, hopefully it should only be temporary.”
    What is a lasting power of attorney?

    A lasting power of attorney allows someone, while they still have full mental capacity, to nominate a trusted friend or relative to make decisions on their behalf in cases of lost capacity.

    Financial and property LPAs can include paying bills and handling financial decisions, while control over medical decisions and potential life-sustaining treatments sits under health and welfare LPAs.

    The Office of Public Guardian, the government office which manages LPAs, said it wanted to become an important safeguarding partner that protected people who lacked mental capacity and had nominated an LPA.

    In a new strategy announced in April 2019, the office said part of its new strategy to protect such people would include working more closely with safeguarding partners, such as adult social services and the NHS, to help them understand the OPG’s role more and look for ways to work together more successfully.

    Although generally seen as a welcome trend, the increased number of LPAs comes with an increased amount of misuse.

    In October data showed the Office of Public Guardian made 721 applications to the Court of Protection to remove or censure LPAs in 2018/19 — 55 per cent more than the previous year and a record high.

    The findings also showed this figure had doubled over the past two years and that making improper gifts and not acting in a vulnerable person’s best interests were the two main reasons for having attorneys censured and removed.

    There have since been calls to reform the system after concerns were raised LPAs failed to provide support for vulnerable customers.

    imogen.tew@ft.com

    What do you think about the issues raised by this story? Email us on fa.letters@ft.com to let us know.

    https://www.ftadviser.com/your-industry/2020/07/03/power-of-attorney-usage-continues-to-rise/

  240. To: The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin
    Queen’s Bench Division

    Mr Justice Nicklin,
    Both Government Legal Services and barrister Benjamin Silverstone (Matrix Chambers)
    were requested to remove the false allegations made against me [Leonard Lawrence] by HHJ Simon
    Oliver in his civil action against Mr Javid Sheikh. My request has been stonewalled!

    HHJ Simon Oliver has a number of reasons why he would like to discredit me. In August 2019 Thames
    Valley Police disclosed a number of documents to me, including an entry by Thames Valley Police that
    the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) having reviewed my case had requested that I was visited.
    This request was not actioned.

    Mrs Justice Pauffley [Family Division] instructed HHJ Simon Oliver, on or about the 11 February 2013,
    that my case be retransferred from Reading County Court to the Court of Appeal. Seven years later the
    re-transferring order has still to be actioned.

    On the 11 June, 2006 Thames Valley Police request to Devon and Cornwall Police that I be visited, a
    task assigned to PC 2631 Emma Pack, now Sergeant 2631 Emma Storey-Barrett, Devon and Cornwall
    Police.

    MOE66 – SPOKEN WITH DTR ADVISED FOR ROUTING AND ATTENDANCE AS PER THAMES VALLEY
    ADVICE 11/06/13 21:11:53

    JN20L – LIAISED WITH PC PACK WHO ATTENDED AND SPOKE TO MR LAWRENCE. 12/06/13 11:27:04)

    F/JN32E – I HAVE EMAILED TVP WITH HIS ACCOUNT AFTER SPEAKING TO THE MALE AT LENGTH
    12/06/2013 11:19:24

    February 2020 a disclosure by Devon and Cornwall Police evidenced that PC Emma Pack 2631 [Sergeant
    2631 Emma Storey-Barrett] Devon and Cornwall Police never attended my home. The senior officer
    responsible for neutralising the above police officers misconduct is the former Force Intelligence Officer,
    Detective Superintendent Claire Armes, now Chief Superintendent Claire Armes, Avon and Somerset Police.

    There is a period from 2011 to October 2015 during which time HHJ Simon Oliver conducted Court of
    Protection hearings, when he did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation, with the knowledge of
    The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) and Ministry of Justice!

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

  241. Aug 15, 2017

    Never sign a lasting power of attorney

    Former Court of Protection judge Denzil Lush said he would never sign a lasting power of attorney
    because it can have a ‘devastating effect’ on family relationships.

    Power of attorney allows someone – usually a family member – to make a financial decision for
    someone who believes they are unable to do so

  242. CATCHING MONSTERS

    WHO IN 2015/16 WITHIN THAMES VALLEY POLICE STOPPED THE INVESTIGATION INTO MY CASE?

    Chief Constable Francis Habgood Thames Valley Police?
    Deputy Chief Constable John Campbell?
    Assistant Chief Constable – Crime and Criminal Justice Tim De Meyer?

    The trail starts with Det. Supt. Gillian Wootton, then Professional Standards. Does it go higher?
    —————————————————————————–

    It was Detective Superintendent Nick Downing that directed me to Action Fraud where my case was
    reviewed by Steve Proffitt [Ex Head of Action Fraud]

    Linkedin
    Nick Downing
    Det Supt Nick Downing, Head of Proceeds of Crime for London, Specialist Economic and Organised
    Crime Command Location New Scotland Yard, later Assistant Chief Constable Nick Downing Head
    of Serious Crime for Kent and Essex Police.

    Linkedin
    Steve Proffitt. Ex-Head of Action Fraud
    A retired Metropolitan Police officer with 30 years police service predominantly in the CID.
    An expert in complex and protracted Fraud Investigation and Police crime management and
    crime recording. A Home Office subject matter expert in Police Recorded Crime and was
    responsible for drafting amendments to the Home Office Counting Rules for recorded crime
    for a number of years. Part of the team that established Action Fraud and the National Fraud
    Intelligence Bureaux. He is an Ex-Head of Action Fraud,

    Reference GA 490. 16:58 3 February 2015 Glen Bancroft
    Following a review of my case by Steve Proffitt [Ex-Head of Action Fraud] offenses of fraud,
    perjury and other more serious offenses were identified.

    August 2019 Thames Valley Police released details of an internal review of my cases, carried
    out in 2015/16. The solicitor’s BP Collins Solicitors had obtained a Part V11 MHA 1983 medical
    report in November 2004 making me a patient subject to the Court of Protection. Then denied
    the existence of this report to the court.

    IPCC notes show:
    Thames Valley Police, Professional Standards Department, under Tim De Meyer, put into place
    special procedures to deal with my case, avoiding other police officers!

    Leonard Lawrence

  245. From: len lawrence
    Sent: 06 July 2020 12:01
    To: attorneygeneral.gov.uk
    Cc: ben silverstone….; pgm@berks….
    Subject: What’s happening here?

    bcc Clerk to The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin

    Queen’s Bench Division

    D…..,
    There appears to be communication problem between Government Legal Services (GLS),
    and Benjamin Silverstone, [Matrix Chambers] and myself. Would you be so kind as to forward
    this email on to GLS and Benjamin Silverstone.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence
    ———————————————————————————-

    Hello Len,

    What’s happening here? I can’t tell who posted the video.

    My Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver [assisted by the Ministry of Justice, Government Legal Services,
    and represented by Benjamin Silverstone, [Matrix Chambers], made a number of false allegations against
    me, as outlined in points 52 and 53 of Mr Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement. I was never told
    of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver’s false allegations.

    Why was I never informed of HHJ Simon Oliver’s false allegations, prior to barrister Benjamin Silverstone
    seeking summary judgement? Those responsible for these specific allegations contained within points
    52 and 53 can be identified. One of the posts on the judges behaving badly website that I am falsely accused
    of making by HHJ Simon Oliver relates to a 14-year old girl that HHJ Simon Oliver placed into care. The post,
    I suggest, was made by a male member of the 14-year-old girls family.

    Secondly, HHJ Simon Oliver alleges that I encouraged other victims to cause a disturbance outside his
    home in Lowther Rd, Wokingham, Berkshire. Absolute lies!

    My preferred location would have been a meeting (rather than a disturbance) at the office of Dr. David
    Staples, The Chief Executive of The United Grand Lodge of England and Wales, Freemasons Hall, 60
    Great Queen St, Holborn, London WC2B 5AZ, the headquarters of the United Grand Lodge of England
    and Wales. However, a discussion had already taken place at Freemason Hall, London, regarding the
    conduct of my Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver and what he has done to others and myself, a third-
    generation disabled Royal Navy veteran.

    In response to the email from the Freemason of Senior London Grand Rank, what happened Len?

    My WBr. HHJ Simon Oliver has recently instigated committal proceeding against Mr. Javed Sheikh.
    He appears very determined to have Javed Sheikh imprisoned.

    Why Mr Javed Sheikh? Mr Javed Sheikh is of Indo-Pakistani descent, he has faced a number of serious
    allegations. It is alleged in a national newspaper that Mr Shaikh was responsible for a post threatening
    to sprinkle anthrax over HHJ Simon Oliver’s home. Why has Mr Shaikh not been questioned by The South
    East Regional Organised Crime Unit (SEROCU) given such a serious threat of an anthrax attack?

    The South East Regional Organised Crime Unit (SEROCU) contacted me (off the record) advising me
    how barrister Dominic Brazil removed the Land Registry caution on my home, avoiding the Court for
    Protection, by using Land Registry Form MH4. However, it was not SEROCU that drove me to the
    meeting with Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox QC. or placed the files on my living room table containing the
    Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that Master Basil Yoxall, Queens Bench Division, had refused
    to disclose to the Court of Protection and Family Division in January 2012.

    Some of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver’s female victims have been forced to flee abroad with their children,
    others have lost both their children and their homes. One case involves a female with Muscular dystrophy
    [diseases that cause progressive weakness and loss of muscle mass] her elderly mother is/was forced to
    travel over 120 miles every time that she wishes to visit her disabled daughter because HHJ Simon Oliver
    would not allow the daughter to be transferred from a care home in Reading to Wales.

    Then there is the case of David, held in a care home in Reading and not allowed to see his elderly mother.
    Also, Jean, (elderly Frenchman) now in a care home in Reading and not allowed to see his partner. There
    is also the case of the 14-year old girl that WBr HHJ Simon Oliver put into a children’s home who then
    ran away. The Nigerian Family whose children were taken and the Nigerian lawyer who nearly lost her
    career because of WBr HHJ Simon Oliver and the telephone call to my now former barrister.

    My first memory as a Court of Protection patient after being evicted onto the streets was waking up on
    the settee of a Pakistani family in Southall. My second memory was being with two Nigerian doctors from
    the DWP questioning what had happened to me, they were very kind and very professional. Why is WBr
    HHJ Simon Oliver picking on these people?

    Finally, my own case, Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver wrote on the 30 August 2012 that he was
    entirely satisfied with how I was treated. As a third-generation disabled Royal Navy Veteran with an
    Acquired Brain Injury, whilst a patient subject to the Court of Protection [According to the Former
    Chambers of Mr Justice Francis QC and Mr Justice Cobb QC ] and lacking mental capacity, I was evicted
    onto the streets of Buckinghamshire without the knowledge of the Court of Protection and left to die.

    A Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank has given a more accurate account of what occurred to me, rather
    than the diagnosis of mental illness. SEE BELOW!

    Leonard Lawrence
    ————————————————————————————-
    4 August 2005 barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers had £10,000 costs placed upon me
    at Slough County Court, following a 5 minute Court of Protection hearing, when it is now known District
    Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Solicitor Susan Andrews, BP Collins Solicitor £4000 fee for writing two letters!

    The £10,000 fee’s claimed by barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk for the 1 hour hearing on the
    16 April 2012 before HHJ Simon Oliver WHO DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION
    AT THAT TIME.

    ———————————————————————————–
    in response to HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT:

    From a Freemason of Provincial Grand Rank

    If only all of the above were the whole story…

    Len lost his Pilot medical and could not continue flying – this was due to organophosphate poisoning due
    to a known problem with toxic additives use in aviation oils – Cases in Australia and the United States were
    settled long ago re this, but not in the UK.

    His wife Nicola started divorce proceedings (around 70% of those with Acquired Brain Injury are divorced
    by their spouse)

    Len’s was admitted to the Cygnet Healthcare Godden Clinic and was incorrectly diagnosed/medicated.

    Medication and incorrect treatment continued in the NHS for years to follow. Five Court of Protection
    incapacitation certificates were issued but the legal advisers failed as was their legal duty to register
    them with the Court of Protection.

    His house was sold unlawfully without the Court of Protection consent – a matter which all legal advisers
    were aware should not be done and a derisory settlement made to Len with considerable adverse financial
    inferences made against him by a district judge – John Fortgang in Slough who should not have made any
    order as he was not appointed by the Court of Protection.

    Another Judge – Jones disqualified herself from any dealings in the matter but then continued to make
    judgements against her own order disqualifying herself.

    Solicitor Sarah Benfield, Radcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors in Reading were reprimanded by the Law
    Society and the maximum compensation awarded to Len – but even this was derisory amount £600.

    Len was subsequently referred to Professor Gordon Turnbull a consultant to the Civil Aviation Authority
    who made a correct diagnosis, and Len got on the road to recovery – a very long one.

    Every legal party to this event has tried to suppress Len, including Simon Oliver and quite frankly one
    should consider they should all be held liable for Len’s substantial losses and compensation.

    The gravity of this matter is such that it needs attention in the highest court in the land. I would suggest
    that a most senior high court judge be appointed to review this case in conjunction with the attorney
    general

    Good luck Len not all freemasons are like Simon Oliver.

  246. Hi Len,
    Just wondering if you could compile a list of bad people in your case, with stars out of 5 for evil. 5/5 for Oli of course.

  247. Thank you very much Len
    It shows a lot about Mr. Lawrence’s character when someone of the white persuasion speaks so highly of other ethnic minorities. This is something that no one gets when they go to court and puts their case before judge Simon Oliver. It is no wonder that Mr. Lawrence is so highly regarded across the world from many different communities and ethnic minorities. We also understand that judge Simon Oliver has actually admitted in his statement to the high court that the comments on this blog are in fact, correct all along. In the same statement, he accuses Mr. Lawrence of a series of claims without any evidence. This is just a tactical approach to discredit Mr. Lawrence which did not work. We are currently in the process of receiving the statement to which it will be analysed significantly. We are very disappointed at judge Simon Oliver and how low he has really gone this time.

  248. Hi, I have forwarded Dr Shaikhs articles as well as corresponding documentation to the Muslim council of the UK as I believe it is in the best interest of the Islamic community that they investigate the allegations of anthrax attacks against a Muslim doctor. Dr Shaikh has been exceptionally well behaved and has held his head up high whilst a court judge is using the system to abuse Muslims and they ruin them because of his own beliefs. They will need to make a public statement relating to the allegations of terrorist activities and doctors in the UK and why this judge has been allowed to manipulate the system on his is own accord. this will be regarded as a hate crime will have to be investigated by the police as well as the Islamic council. These hate crimes create further problems in our society which all Muslims have to be subjected to. Muslims are not terrorists and Simon Oliver has now branded an innocent doctor as a terrorist to exacerbate the stereotypes that exist in society to his own advantage. It is for exactly the same reasons that these fictional allegations can create harm to the wider Muslim community. I will be putting this onto my social media pages as well. If anyone has any further information about this, please contact me directly on my private email address so I can forward it onto the Muslim council of London and Berkshire who will have to act on these allegations because it affects all of us. Aali786@gmail.com. Kindest regards. Abdul Ali

  249. Dear all
    This is a contact page for the Islamic/Muslim council of Great Britain based in Whitechapel in East London. Please send all of your complaints and concerns regarding Simon Oliver to them so that they can respond directly. The Moj will have to answer to the allegations which they have secretly being encompassing as part of the campaign against Mr Sheikh

    Contact

  250. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/moj-chief-confirms-departure/5104946.article

    Dear All,
    We are glad to announce that Richard Heaton (laughingly style as ‘Sir’) has been sacked from the Ministry of Justice effective immediately. We wish him all the bad luck for his tenure ahead. Its a shame he is leaving under a dark cloud but that’s what happens when your spending public money and resources fighting for criminals rather the against them.

    Mr Heaton was the financier of the litigation against a medical practitioner who he labelled as a terrorist for just being a Muslim. He also protected judge Simon Oliver using the High Court as a kangaroo court exercise with pre-written judgements and pre-arranged outcomes. He was also responsible for abusing young boys in South London care homes and encouraging other legal unprofessionals to do so too with the protection of the MoJ. Mr Heaton leaves behind millions of victims across the world.

    We would like to offer Mr Heaton a job in our legal department where he can start off with a basic generous salary as a paralegal so he can witness the UK justice system in all its inglorious nonsense (considering he is ignoring everything and what everyone is saying on this site). He will of course be leaving with a big payout and a generous pension paid for by the taxpayer.

    We all at judges behaving badly wish him ‘good riddence to bad rubbish’.

    From the team at judges behaving badly

  251. http://www.intelligenceuk.com/images/fund_640_380_1.jpg

    INTELLIGENCE UK PRIVATE ANTI CORRUPTION FUNDRAISER

    Intelligence UK, the private intelligence agency dedicated to combating the UK’s domestic corruption issue running rife throughout the public authorities is raising funds to take direct action against the perpetrators.

    The leadership need a shake up, one that the common purpose system will never give them.

    These taxpayer sponsored state terrorists within the secret family, insolvency and criminal courts literally do have blood on their hands, they are responsible for more deaths by suicide and loss of quality of life than all of the Islamic State terrorists on British soil combined. These are the terrorists operating from within. The courts are not going justice, the regulators don’t regulate and the police and courts provide impunity to the corruptors, the deceitful lawyers of common purpose who have been using our courts as cash cows and vehicles to asset strip under the facade of insolvency law. It is the leadership at fault, if the leadership lack integrity, then everything they lead goes south, that is precisely what has happened. It is time to hold them to account.

    We have assisted dozens of victims of human rights abuse and miscarriages of justice who have been terrorised through the courts. Many of whom we have assisted for free to further their cases and assist them in getting justice when otherwise they would not have done.

    We are raising a fighting fund to take direct intrusive action against all the perpetrators we have identified. We are able to operate swiftly and efficiently and being legally and technically trained we are not using funds to feed the cabal of lawyers, we have the capability to do it ourselves, with minimal reliance on third party counsel who only appear on the days in court.

    Please donate generously. Your donation will be making a massive difference, reshaping the UK justice system, and evoking change for the good of our country and future generations. We provide all our donors with regular updates so you can follow the progress we are making. Alternatively, please share this message with those you know that may take an interest in our campaign.

    Donate quickly and safely via Paypal processing:

    Alternatively, if you prefer, we can send you an E-invoice for the sum you could like to donate. Simply reply to this email telling us how much you would like to donate and details for the invoice and we will take care of it right away. Please feel free to contact us with any questions.

    Thank you and have a great weekend.

    INTELLIGENCE UK

    http://www.intelligenceuk.com/campaignx2.html

  253. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/who_is_financing_judge_simon_oli_7

    I have amade a FOI request to the cabinet office.

    Dear Cabinet Office,

    I want make a Freedom of Information request where i woukd like the following questions answered;

    1. In the litigation in the High Court of Oliver v S, case number QB-2019-000194, who in the Ministry of Justice is financing this? Is it Mr Richard Heaton?
    2. The judgement for this litigation has been put on the Matrix Chambers website by Mr Benjamin Silverstone. The approved judgement uploaded on and is dated 29th November 2019 when the High Court handed down this judgement on 10th December 2019. Does the MoJ know this and can they explain why this approved judgement was given 12 days before the hand down date to Matrix Chambers?
    3. Justice Julian Knowles and Barrister Mr Benjamin Silverstone were aware of each other’s identity prior to the hearing in Oliver v S on the 29th November 2019, as they both worked together at Matrix Chambers. Can the MoJ explain why this hearing proceeded under fraudulent basis?
    4. In the litigation, Oliver v S, QB-2019-000194, judge Simon Oliver states he paid costs totalling £40,000. No paperwork has ever been provided. However, on the following link, it states that the Government Legal Department is instructed to represent judge Simon Oliver.
    https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/22.jpg
    Which one is correct? Has HHJ Oliver financed his own litigation?
    5. Thousands of victims of judge Simon Oliver exist but the MoJ has refused to address these concerns. It involves bribery, gang rapes, extortion, child abduction and false accusations? Has the MoJ conducted any investigation into judge Simon Oliver since 1993?
    6. Regarding newspapers articles with URLs;
    A.) https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/extrainee-doctor-in-threeyear-malicious-vendetta-against-judge-a4311991.html
    B.) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/former-trainee-doctor-threatens-anthrax-attack-against-judge-zm75nklrj
    C.) https://theeyeofmedia.com/circuit-judge-places-injunction-against-aggrieved-doctor/

    Has judge Simon Oliver reported any of these allegations of being subjected to anthrax attacks to the regional crime squad or the police? The allegation is not supported by evidence but has been accepted by the MoJ and the High Court. Can the MoJ provide evidence of this? If not? Can you clarify why a Muslim doctor was accused of this and published in international media creating libel.

    Yours faithfully,
    Aaron Parks

  255. On the 5th June 2018 I attended a First Tier Tribunal and the Judge was a Mr Lederman, this was held at Fox Court in a separate room at the back of the building. This case was a ‘KANGAROO COURT’, there was a release medical certificate that Lederman continually used as evidence, I explained that the medical certificate was a FORGERY but he refused to accept this fact. He refused to hear my evidence. I had ‘DIRECTIONS ‘ from the late Judge Stubbs and Judge Horrocks that the original compendium of Radiation Film Badges and QFE Dosimeters be handed into court for examination but the Ministry of Defence Legal Team refused to do so. ‘Directions were also given that a Mr R Cockerill, the dosimetry Manager at AWE be made available for cross examination at Court: Again, the Ministry of Defence legal team refused .

    I requested the Upper Tier to ‘Set Aside’ the judgement of this case but they refused, stating, that they could not interfere with the decision of the lower court. I wrote to the RCJ and the Supreme Court only to be told that it was up to the Upper Tier.
    The judgement made by Lederman contained many lies and inaccuracies he should not be placed in a position to Judge.

  256. On the 5th June 2018 I attended a First Tier Tribunal and the Judge was a Mr Lederman, this was held at Fox Court in a separate room at the back of the building. This case was a ‘KANGAROO COURT’, there was a release medical certificate that Lederman continually used as evidence, I explained that the medical certificate was a FORGERY but he refused to accept this fact. He refused to hear my evidence. I had ‘DIRECTIONS ‘ from the late Judge Stubbs and Judge Horrocks that the original compendium of Radiation Film Badges and QFE Dosimeters be handed into court for examination but the Ministry of Defence Legal Team refused to do so. ‘Directions were also given that a Mr R Cockerill, the dosimetry Manager at AWE be made available for cross examination at Court: Again, the Ministry of Defence legal team refused .

    I requested the Upper Tier to ‘Set Aside’ the judgement of this case but they refused, stating, that they could not interfere with the decision of the lower court. I wrote to the RCJ and the Supreme Court only to be told that it was up to the Upper Tier.
    The judgement made by Lederman contained many lies and inaccuracies he should not be placed in a position to Judge.

  257. Regarding links with URL

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/extrainee-doctor-in-threeyear-malicious-vendetta-against-judge-a4311991.html?amp

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/former-trainee-doctor-threatens-anthrax-attack-against-judge-zm75nklrj

    https://m.facebook.com/eveningstandard/posts/3042055499171424

    Ex-trainee doctor in three-year 'malicious vendetta' against judge

    Dear Everyone

    Can everyone that has read the newspaper articles relating to anthrax attacks lodge an online police report to the police on the link at the bottom. This is because everyone that has read it is a witness to the hate crime that Dr Sheikh has been subjected to by Simon Oliver. You don’t have to put in your real address and only put in your email address so that they can contact you for a statement if required. Even if you do not know Simon Oliver, as long as you have read the newspaper articles online, then that is enough for you to become a witness to the crime. No one knows how many people have read the articles but the more crime reports that can be lodged, the better.

    https://www.met.police.uk/ro/report/ocr/af/how-to-report-a-crime/report-crime-happened-online/?lid=a01c9931-7c28-49e5-a344-eeb38d598ea7&cid=&rid=5&stepid=1-2-2-4-3-2

    Kindest regards

  258. To: Professor David Whyte, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    RE: MEDICAL CERTIFICATE NOT VALID

    Dear David

    Not one of the Court of Protection Medical Certificates issued in my case has the embossed seal of
    the Court of Protection on the certificate. Two Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, were issued
    by Dr. Jeremy Royds located at Cygnet Healthcare without a medical. Cygnet Healthcare is a private
    Healthcare company.

    The Court of Protection and Public Guardian has no knowledge of these Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificates having ever being issued. Both were held by solicitor Helen Mary CLIFT office of the Official
    Solicitor to the Senior Courts and others.

    I had two visitors, not Thames Valley Police or the National Crime Agency. Another organisation.
    They wanted to view the Court of Protection Medical Certificates used to hold me for 18 months whilst I
    was asset stripped. In less than 30 seconds they questioned why none of the Court of Protection Medical
    Certificates had the embossed seal of the Court of Protection on them. Without the Court of Protection
    seal the Medical Certificates are not valid.

    I was instructed to send a Court of Protection, Medical Certificate, to Thames Valley Police to ascertain
    the authenticity of the certificate. Eleven months later no reply!

    Thames Valley Police have however given up some more of their secrets, sufficient to incriminate the
    law firm BP Collins Solicitors and solicitor Graeme S FRASER.

    Kindest Regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    —————————————————————————–
    Thu 01/08/2019 23:16
    Chief Constable John Campbell, Thames Valley Police
    Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg, Thames Valley Police

    Dear Sir’s

    Ref: JC & JH 1/8/19

    1. Please find an electronic copy of a document titled: COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
    issued on the 27 January 2005 by Dr Jeremy Royds, a private psychiatrist from Cygnet Healthcare,
    Godden Green, Kent.

    2. Hard copies of the attached Court of Protection Medical Certificate addressed to yourselves have been
    received by Thames Valley Police HQ. See Below:

    Your item was collected from **Kidlington DO** at **24-07-2019**.
    Signed for by: TVP HQ
    Service used: Royal Mail Signed For™ Delivered: 9:10am

    3. Former officers, equivalent in rank to yourselves, have inspected the attached Court of Protection
    Medical Certificate. They note that this specific COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE
    was viewed by a detective and financial officer from Thames Police, Economic Crime Unit,
    (around 2010) when they visited me in Devon.

    4. I am directed to enquire whether the attached COURT OF PROTECTION MEDICAL CERTIFICATE is
    authentic or fraudulent?

    Yours respectfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  259. A crisis in the judiciary: Joshua Rozenberg on the High Court’s failure to staff its benches

    A crisis in the judiciary: Joshua Rozenberg on the High Court’s failure to staff its benches

    By Joshua Rozenberg
    Oct 16 2017 9:58am
    Rumour has it only 19 of this year’s 25 vacancies were filled

    Not enough people want to become judges. Or, at least, there are not enough people coming forward who are good enough to join the High Court.

    There were precisely 100 High Court judges in post this month at the start of the legal year. With a complement of 108, the court is eight judges short — or nine given that Mr Justice Peter Smith has, in effect, been suspended on full pay for more than a year. Contrary to my prediction at the time, Smith failed to stand down in the spring and a disciplinary panel is preparing to consider complaints against him at the end of this month.

    The High Court has been running below full strength for some time now. Last year, there were 14 vacancies and six posts were left unfilled. In his latest annual report, the outgoing Lord Chief Justice said that he and his senior colleagues continued to be immensely concerned about the “serious loss of morale across the judiciary and continuing dissatisfaction over working conditions, the volume of work, and pay and pensions”. Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd added that any failure to address the problems of pay and pensions would have a serious impact on morale and on recruitment.

    So, will the High Court ever be fully staffed?

    “It is not uncommon for there to be a time lag before newly appointed judges take up office,” I was told by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). “There will be more announcements in the coming months.”

    But how many? The word on the street is that 19 appointments were approved after the JAC advertised “up to 25” vacancies earlier this year (screenshot below). Only 13 names were announced during the summer, with 12 of those judges joining the High Court on 2 October (the beginning of the legal year).

    Screenshot via JAC’s website
    And the JAC has already established another High Court selection exercise, with applications to be lodged by the middle of November. Again, there will be “up to 25 vacancies” across all three divisions of the High Court.

    This is the second time the JAC has announced that no part-time judging experience will be needed. But, as it adds from what must be bitter experience, any solicitor or barrister who is only now thinking of putting in an application before the deadline next month has probably left it too late to demonstrate transferable skills.

    The latest comments from across Legal Cheek
    In fact, pretty much all 13 new High Court judges appointed in August and September have some judicial experience. Four were promoted from the lower ranks: Julian Goose QC, who was a senior circuit judge specialising in crime; Clare Moulder, a former Linklaters partner who sat in commercial, immigration and criminal cases; Gwynneth Knowles QC, who was a judge of the upper tribunal; and Peter Lane, a former tribunal judge who has now been appointed president of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).

    Some of those who have come straight from the bar are strikingly young: Matthew Nicklin QC, former joint head of chambers at the media set 5RB, is 46. Julian Knowles QC, formerly an extradition and public law expert at Matrix Chambers, is 48. So is Sara Cockerill QC, a shipping specialist. And some are significantly older: Martin Spencer QC, who was at Hailsham Chambers, is 61. Jonathan Cohen QC is 66 but hardly a new boy, having sat part-time in the family division since 2005.

    While Cohen has a distinguished judicial ancestor, several new judges are state-educated and were the first in their families to study at university. Akhlaq Choudhury QC was born in England to parents from Bangladesh and educated at a comprehensive near Glasgow. David Williams QC went to a comprehensive school in Leighton Buzzard. Simon Bryan QC’s education in Blackpool was state-funded.

    Others demonstrate that there is more to life than being a lawyer: Amanda Yip QC, from Liverpool, had three children before she was 30 and is a strong supporter of flexible working at the bar.

    So: nine men, four women; nine practitioners, four full-time judges (including, for the first time, tribunal judges); 11 barristers, two solicitors; one person of Asian descent. All things considered, quite a diverse group?

    More broadly, Lady Hale is now president of the Supreme Court and Lady Black of Derwent has joined her on the bench, along with the first Welsh-speaking justice, Lord Lloyd-Jones. Lord Justice Singh is now in the Court of Appeal. Time for the JAC to rest on its laurels?

    Not according to Graham Gee, a professor of public law at the University of Sheffield and Erika Rackley, a professor of law at the University of Birmingham. The two academics have recently edited a series of essays called Debating Judicial Appointments in an Age of Diversity, based on a conference they arranged.

    Some of the contributors to their book speak from a position of great authority.

    Sir Tom Legg was permanent secretary to the Lord Chancellor from 1989 to 1998 and, in his day, was effectively a one-man JAC. He has some interesting reflections on merit although I’m not persuaded by his suggestion that we should restore a political element in the appointments process. That still exists, as we saw when Liz Truss, as Lord Chancellor, excluded the judges’ favourite for appointment as Lord Chief Justice this year. There is speculation that Truss was doing the Prime Minister’s bidding.

    Other contributions are alarmingly bland.

    Christopher Stephens CBE, who chaired the JAC from 2011 to 2016, writes mainly about competency frameworks and ad hoc selection panels, about appraisals and performance metrics. Stephens admits he “would like to have seen greater numbers of diverse, non-traditional candidates joining the judiciary, particularly at more senior levels — not only from its four key target groups but also from other pools of talent such as academia, the employed bar, chartered legal executives and government lawyers”. But he does not seem to have found a way of recruiting them.

    Are there any? Gee and Rackley certainly think so; and they have summarised their proposals in a freely-available post. In summary, they say:

    The JAC must do more to ensure that the judiciary is not merely paying lip-service to diversity but actually pursues policies that will lead to faster change.
    The JAC should take more “ownership” of the selection process for senior appointments rather than simply endorsing the judges’ favoured candidates.
    The JAC should continue to scrutinise and improve its own processes.
    Overall, the JAC should supply more forceful leadership on diversity. It should have greater confidence in its ability to contest the preoccupations of ministers, a self-interested legal profession and an embattled judiciary.
    But what does that mean in practice? Surely merit is the only criterion for appointment?

    According to Gee and Rackley, some judges still cling to a traditional understanding of merit that places a premium on advocacy skills, experience at the bar and experience in a part-time fee-paid judicial role. The authors want more appointments to be made on the basis of potential.

    Judicial skills, they say, are not limited to the technical legal and advocacy abilities associated with excellence at the bar. They include communication, management and leadership skills that are needed for a successful career as a solicitor. The JAC should therefore resist the judiciary’s insistence on part-time judicial experience. This not only favours long-serving barristers, they argue. It also reinforces traditional understandings of merit.

    On this basis, we can see the JAC’s “no judicial experience necessary” boast as a sign of strength rather than of desperation. And its warning that solicitors have probably left it too late to join the judiciary next year now reads more like a counsel of despair.

    In their book, Gee and Rackley chart the tensions between Stephens, as chair of the JAC, and Thomas, as Lord Chief Justice.

    “Inside the JAC,” they write, “it was felt that the Lord Chief Justice was second-guessing many of its decisions… For their part, some senior judges felt that the JAC lacked an effective strategy for encouraging judicial diversity while others complained that its selection processes made too many onerous demands of the senior judiciary.”

    Gee and Rackley are quite right to say that the JAC should do more to publicise the improvements it has introduced already. Like other underfunded arms-length public bodies, the JAC has compromised its independence by outsourcing its media relations to the Ministry of Justice press office. When I first asked, the press office told me there were not 100 High Court judges holding office on 2 October but 100.5.

    100.5? Did the reference to 0.5 of a judge mean that one judge was working for 50% of the normal working hours? If so, who was it?

    We can’t tell you, said the MoJ press office. “On both counts this is personal information agreed between the individual and their head of division, and therefore it would be inappropriate to share this.”

    That’s absurd. I can see that a judge working half-time for medical reasons — perhaps while recovering from illness — might want that fact to be kept confidential. But the fact that a judge was permitted to work part-time — if that is what this means — is something the judiciary should be proud of.

    It also increased the headcount by half a judge. Or it did until a correction arrived. It seems there were two half-judges in the High Court last year. One has recently retired and the other has now reverted to full-time working.

    The failure to recruit enough permanent judges means that the High Court will continue to rely on lawyers sitting part-time. Some of those may be practitioners of the highest calibre who don’t want to give up the day job. Others may be among the 100 applicants for the High Court bench who didn’t make the grade this time (or, no doubt, in previous years).

    But there is one thing about this I find reassuring. If the JAC’s standards had been lower, it would have been perfectly possible to appoint another eight judges from those applicants. Had diversity had been the sole criterion for appointment, I imagine it would have been possible to make an even more diverse selection than the 13 whose names have so far been announced. Rightly, the JAC was unwilling to recommend candidates who did not merit appointment.

    Merit must never be diluted in order to meet diversity targets. We just need to search more widely for the best judges.

  260. Freemason ‘closed shop’ blocked me, says barrister

    A BARRISTER claims his application to become a judge has been turned down because he is not a freemason.

    Roger Everest says he was told 30 years ago that he would never get on in the legal profession after turning down an invitation to join the Dinas Llandaff lodge of the Freemasons in Cardiff.

    Last week the 64-year-old was informed by the director of judicial appointments at the Department for Constitutional Affairs that he was not being appointed a circuit judge.

    Earlier this year Mr Everest, who practises from chambers at Pontyclun near Cardiff, had a claim that his career had been blighted by his non-membership of the freemasons rejected by the European Court of Human Rights.

    Yesterday he said, “The judiciary in South Wales is a closed shop which I believe excludes ethnic minorities, women and men who are not part of a masonic network.

    “After over 30 years as a practising barrister on the Wales and Chester circuit with hundreds of satisfied clients – not one of whom has ever made a complaint against me – I am furious never to have been offered the opportunity to sit as a judge.

    “Through The Western Mail I call on the Labour Government to appoint an eminent and impartial privy councillor to investigate the many miscarriages of justice in South Wales – especially the wrongful convictions that followed the murders of Lynette White and Mr and Mrs Tooze – and to publish a register naming judges who have ever been masons. Judges should be appointed on their merit as lawyers, independent of their standing among masons.”

    Mr Everest said he planned to meet his MP Dr Kim Howells to discuss the matter.

    He added, “It is my firm belief that there is a masonic connection with the miscarriages of justice that have occurred in South Wales.”

    In February 1998, the Home Office committed itself to establishing public registers of Freemasons in the judiciary and the police.

    In a response to a report written by the Home Affairs select committee, the Home Office stated, “The Home Secretary proposes to make a formal request to the United Grand Lodge (the governing body of freemasonry in England and Wales) that they provide on a regional basis consistent with the regional structure of the Lodges, the names and identifying occupations and other necessary details of those who are or who become freemasons in the specified professions and occupations.

    “If the United Grand Lodge is unwilling or unable to comply with this request, or to comply only partially (for example because it does not itself have the data in the required form) the government will initially make arrangements for registers to be opened for all the specified professions and occupations. All would be invited to register. Although at this stage a failure to return information would not of itself be a breach of conditions of employment, any nil returns would be shown as such.

    “The government will consult on where the registers should be available but in any event it believes that they should be publicly available.

    “The government will address the need for legislation having regard to the extent of compliance with voluntary registers, once established.”

    John Hamill, director of communications for the United Grand Lodge said, “The Home Office did not pursue the idea of registers because of the incorporation of human rights legislation into UK law. Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights forbids discrimination against minorities.

    “When a straw poll was done of judges several years ago, less than five per cent were freemasons and none of those responsible for judicial appointments were.”

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/freemason-closed-shop-blocked-me-2474818

  261. BROTHERS IN SILK

    rebecca_6a

    THIS IS a tale of three Cardiff barristers.

    Two flourished — they became QCs. One has been honoured by the Queen, the other has made his name in major public inquiries.

    Both are members of an important legal lodge in Wales.

    The third prospered but was never made a QC. He believes this was because he refused to join the lodge.

    He took his fight to the European Court of Human Rights but failed.

    IT’S 1973. For five years Roger Everest has been a barrister at the chambers at 34 Park Place in Cardiff.

    Everest is invited by his clerk Ken Gorman to join a new masonic lodge that’s being set up. It’s to be called Dinas Llandaf.

    One of the founders of the lodge, Eifion Morgans, is a barrister who will later become head of chambers at 34 Park Place. Morgans is already a past master of another Cardiff lodge, Shir Gar.
    ROGER EVEREST The barrister believes his decision not to join a masonic lodge prevented him from being appointed a QC.

    ROGER EVEREST
    The barrister believes his decision not to join a masonic lodge prevented him from being appointed a QC.

    Another founder is solicitor Sir Norman Lloyd-Edwards who had been a Tory councillor in Cardiff for many years.

    Today he’s the Grand Master of the masonic province of South Wales. He stepped into that role in 2008 just as he retired from being the Queen’s man – Lord Lieutenant – in South Glamorgan.

    Other well-known Tory members of the lodge have included Stefan Terlezki, MP for Cardiff West between 1983 and 1987 and Gwilym Jones, MP for Cardiff North and a junior minister in the Welsh Office from 1992 to 1997.

    Everest decided not to join Dinas Llandaf. Ken Gorman warned him his advancement at the Bar would be affected.

    Two other members of the chambers were happy to join the lodge. They were Winston Roddick and Gerard Elias.

    When Dinas Llandaf opened for business the first master was the solicitor and Cardiff Tory councillor Julius Hermer.

    In 1984 Gerald Elias was made a Queen’s Counsel – a promotion to the inner circle of barristers allowing the letters QC to be added after his name.

    It’s called “taking silk” after the material in the gown a QC wears in court. Being a QC opens the way for a barrister to become a judge and with it the eventual possibility of a knighthood.

    Roger Everest couldn’t help noticing that there was a masonic connection in Elias’ appointment.

    The man who had an important say in appointing QCs in Wales, Mr Justice Leonard, was then presiding judge of the Wales and Chester circuit.

    Elias’ appointment was made by the Queen on the advice of Lord Hailsham, then Lord Chancellor, but on the recommendation of the Presiding Judge of the circuit.

    Mr Justice Leonard was a mason.

    (He was also infamous as the judge in the 1987 Ealing vicarage case where he handed down shorter sentences for rape than for aggravated burglary.)

    Two years later, in 1986, it was the turn of Winston Roddick to “take silk”.

    Elias and Roddick are well-respected advocates who would no doubt have been awarded silk without any masonic connections.

    However, Roger Everest claims that Eifion Morgans, who died in 1987, told him that their advancement was made easier by the fact the two barristers had met Leonard at masonic functions.

    Roddick became master of Dinas Llandaf in 1983 and was followed a year later by Elias.
    GERARD ELIAS QCDid his membership of Dinas Llandaf accelerate his appointment as a QC?

    GERARD ELIAS QC
    Did his membership of Dinas Llandaf accelerate his appointment as a QC?

    In 1997 Elias was appointed lead counsel to the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal.

    A year later Winston Roddick was appointed Counsel General to the National Assembly for Wales.

    On his appointment, he resigned from freemasonry and has never rejoined.

    In 2003, when Roddick’s term of office came to an end, Roger Everest was intrigued to note that the man nominated for the £140,000 a year job by the Civil Service Commissioners in London was … Gerard Elias QC.

    However, First Minister Rhodri Morgan, a Labour politician with an ardent anti-masonic reputation, put his foot down.

    Morgan said “I did not register any over-riding objection to the shortlist, although I did comment on the fact that one candidate, subsequently recommended for appointment by the panel, was a prominent freemason.”

    “I was, however, prepared to waive my concern on this issue, noting that the candidate was prepared to resign from the freemasonry, as did the previous general counsel on appointment.”

    “When the permanent secretary advised me of the recommendation from the panel and I read the full papers, I became aware of information not previously available to me that the recommended candidate was also a board member of the Independent Supervisory Authority for Hunting.”

    Elias had joined the board of the Independent Supervisory Authority for Hunting ISAH. Another member of ISAH was Sir Ronald Waterhouse, the former High Court judge who chaired the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of which Elias was leading counsel.

    The First Minister vetoed the appointment because “I judged that the legal advice of a Counsel General prominently associated with these two controversial issues would not carry the necessary stamp of untramelled authority throughout the Assembly.”
    THE DINAS Llandaf Lodge meets five times a year in Cardiff. The entry in the 2009-10 South Wales provincial yearbook names 34 of the current membership of 40. They are:S R Adam • A A Attard • F G Bottarini • G Bull • D Davies • J A Davies • G Elias, QC • B M Etherington • S Evans • K T Flynn, OBE • F A Green • P M M Grimson • J Hermer • E Howells • P S R Jamison • F A Jones • G A Jones • Gwilyn H Jones • G J Jones • M S Lewis • K P Malloy • P R Marshall, OBE • W G D Morgan • P A L Mount • N H B Payne • P G Powell • J W Reed • Neil J Richards • J W Richards • N J Richards • J S Sidoli • C M Williams • P M Williams, OBE • C E Yandell

    DINAS LLANDAF, Lodge No 8512
    THE LODGE meets five times a year in Cardiff. The entry in the 2009-10 South Wales provincial yearbook names 34 of the current membership of 40. They are:
    S R Adam • A A Attard • F G Bottarini • G Bull • D Davies • J A Davies • G Elias, QC • B M Etherington • S Evans • K T Flynn, OBE • F A Green • P M M Grimson • J Hermer • E Howells • P S R Jamison • F A Jones • G A Jones • Gwilyn H Jones • G J Jones • M S Lewis • K P Malloy • P R Marshall, OBE • W G D Morgan • P A L Mount • N H B Payne • P G Powell • J W Reed • Neil J Richards • J W Richards • N J Richards • J S Sidoli • C M Williams • P M Williams, OBE • C E Yandell

    Elias hit back saying he had never been to a hunt and had joined ISAH because of his disciplinary expertise in cricket. He had offered to resign from the organisation – and freemasonry – if it was felt there was any conflict of interest.

    He denied that he was a “prominent” freemason and said he had not been an active mason for seven years.

    This statement was made in March 2004. This suggests that he gave up being an active mason in 1997, the year when the public hearings of the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal began.

    Rebecca Television checked the Dinas Llandaf entries in the provincial yearbooks. In every year Elias is shown as a subscribing past master of the lodge which meant that he continued to pay his dues and remained a mason. He is still listed in the 2009-10 edition.

    Elias accepted the First Minister’s decision to veto his appointment but added: “Whether … the First Minister’s personal objections to my appointment are proper considerations, either as a matter of public law, or even as a matter of fairness and justice to a candidate, I leave for others to judge.”

    Roger Everest tried to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights but the Secretariat refused to hear it.

    Rebecca Television e-mailed Gerard Elias about Everest’s claims. He did not reply.

    We asked Rhodri Morgan to comment. He told us he didn’t want to talk about the issue.

    WINSTON RODDICK was elected police commissioner for North Wales last November. The article A Fistful of Coppers charts some of the controversy that surrounded his election.

    ♦♦♦

    BROTHERS IN SILK

  262. Dear Len
    This is just to give you an update about the current circumstances relating to Simon Oliver’s litigation in the High Court. The judge hearing the case on the 27th of July 2020 called Justice Nicklin and his clerk say that they have not received a signed affidavit from me when I uploaded it electronically and I have a receipt for it. After I provided the receipt to justice Nicklins clerk, the matter was ignored again. In a separate matter, the government legal department lawyer Miss Louisa Lloyd Jones has also blocked any attachments that could come from me. I have sent 9 emails with attachments and including repeat emails and none have gone through. I have sent her screenshots of these emails and the error messages i received and her response is that she does not understand my email. I think this is just an attempt by the High Court and the government legal department to have my affidavit thrown out by playing these games that they haven’t received it. On a separate note, I have reported the matter to the police about the false accusation of anthrax attacks. This has been logged as a hate crime and i have also reported Matrix Chambers and the government legal departments legal team for Oliver as well. It’s sickening the amount of corruption that Simon Oliver will do and how much the government legal department and the Ministry of Justice will support him in it. I guess the next step would be to copy and paste my affidavit in to the comments of this site because then I know they definitely have received it.

    I can confirm that everything that I have said about is the truth and the best of my knowledge.
    Signed
    Mr J Sheikh

  264. We see this type of MAFIA-LIKE activity in the courts all the time. This is how the corrupt legal fraternity operates EVERY DAY – particularly in cases where they are stealing property. They have corrupt clerks and court managers operating from inside the courts in every strategic position and cases are earmarked to fail. It is a criminal operation. They do it to thousands of people and have been doing it for many decades at least. I think they are finally onto Heaton, which is why he is leaving.

  265. Lennie

    I have repeated time and time again that they didn’t want you opening the (buried) toxic air syndrome
    can of worms as it would open very large and expensive flood gates for claims by front line airline staff.
    So, the peons and useful idiots were all lined up to screw you into the ground.

    Accordingly, things went missing, the police in varying degrees of seniority were coerced to bend facts
    and evidence, HMRC hard boys were let loose all supported by bent members of the judiciary (and their
    known affiliates in the masons) in collusion with compliant members of the medical profession in order
    to keep you drugged up to the eyeballs and de-railed broke and washed up – and finished, flat on your
    back with nothing. Even your ex-wife’s solicitor Graeme Fraser was in on the act (probably – bet there’s
    a connection there somewhere that we will find)

    But, they all made a serious mistake …. they under-estimated you and us. Badly.

    And quite rightly, you’re on your feet, fighting and now slowly and patiently turning the screw on their
    nuts. Good. When this little lot comes out in the open, which I think it might (assuming you don’t go for
    a compensation package based on an nda) it will make a marvelously rich source of material for a tv
    documentary and/or a book !

    I’ve often wondered who was ultimately behind all of this; the airline companies, or, the insurance
    companies that stood to pay out millions in compensation.

    Because I’d bet hard cash that they’re the ones who were driving it – and they’re the ones who ultimately
    deserve a coup de grâce.

    Chicksands

  266. Simon Oliver actually wanted to settle with Len and liasing with a fellow Freemason to contact Len. Obviously Len is not like Simon Oliver and wanted justice which Simon Oliver cannot provide because that’s not his role. Len has maintained the moral high ground in all of this and has fought his case with the utmost pride and dignity for not his own benefit but those of the people who could not speak and fight.

    The MoJ should be thankful they are dealing with just one blog. It could be worse! We could create a database of bad judges with the comments enabled so that the public can review the conduct of all judges. Maybe this way we can all see which lodge each judge is in and how they relate to other lodges.

    Simon Oliver is what we refer to as a ‘Mashed potato’ and a very small problem.

    Enjoy the show

  267. Protecting the Vulnerable?

    by Sam Smith on June 15, 2011

    Post image for Protecting the Vulnerable?

    The recent case of Steven Neary is the tip of the iceberg. Mark Neary is to be commended for winning his case, but the grim truth is that he is an exception and not the rule.

    The last two years have seen an explosion in awareness of an overbearing state. Under Labour, poorly drafted and shoddy laws gave public bodies wildly unchecked powers to lock people up and control their lives. Clumsy, bureaucratic and expensive legislation has put layer upon layer of hurdles in the way of people seeking to exercise their rights. Many forthright and well meaning people have talked about the problems but the only solutions proposed so far will worsen the problem. The recent announcement that councils will be required to have adult safeguarding boards utterly misses the point. In the Neary case the council claimed to be ‘safeguarding’ when they took Steven into care and kept him there unlawfully.

    The law needs to recognise that people working for state bodies are only human and as error prone as the rest of us, and that often people will need safeguarding from the state. Remedies need to be cheap, simple and quick – not expensive, slow and complicated.

    This article is not about problems. It is about solutions. The purpose of this article is to set out some specific policy proposals to make the Court of Protection and related institutions cheaper and more accessible to service users. It is my hope that these proposals will filter through to wiser and more knowledgeable souls who will build upon it. Readers of Anna’s blog are invited to comment and if we later publish a proper policy paper we will try to credit suggestions –

    1. Court of Protection Procedures

    Unlike Mental Health Review Tribunals, the Court of Protection is a full blown court making use of its own rules and also the Civil Procedure Rules. Typically both solicitors and barristers are required but due to the lack of legal aid many applicants are litigants in person.

    It is proposed –

    a. the Court of Protection rules be re-written and modelled along the Small Claims track of the County Court, for example in terms of the rules of evidence. Typically parties should only need solicitors.
    b. like a Tribunal the Court should be under a strict duty to assist a litigant in person.
    c. as now costs should not be awarded in welfare cases. This rule should be extended to some limited financial cases, in particular in complaints about the conduct of a property and affairs deputy or applications by P to discharge a deputy.
    d. In general the Court should have the powers of the High Court but the accessibility of a very helpful County Court Judge in the Small Claims track.
    e. the overriding duty of the Court should be set out as being first to protect P’s autonomy as far as possible and second to protect P’s interests.

    2. Litigation Capacity

    A disturbing trend has arisen of local authorities using the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to find litigants incapable, for example in the infamous Rachel Pullen case. Unfortunately the procedures are vague and there is no clearly defined procedure for challenging a finding of incapacity. This procedure needs to be cleared up and a low bar for the test of capacity needs to be set with the opportunity for review of capacity from time to time.

    The problem is that again Britain lags behind largely because civil servants sulk whenever the Europeans point out problems with out procedures. Most European countries have procedures for restoring and contesting litigation capacity.

    Oddly, in Mental Health Review Tribunals there appears to be little evidence of the appointment of litigation friends. Applicants whose cases are meritless or tainted by insane arguments, ‘the Pixies did it!’ simply lose or are dealt with under case management procedures. There is an argument that the concept of litigation friend should not exist and these are the proposals for reform –

    a. in any court or tribunal, where a person is found to lack litigation capacity or the ability to instruct a lawyer the Official Solicitor be appointed as a Party. However unlike now the protected party should still be able to make applications to the Court in person (for example if they disagree with the Offical Solicitor).
    b. where a party is deemed to lack capacity to instruct a lawyer, but can nevertheless find one to act pro-bono then they are to be allowed to instruct that lawyer and the court must hear any application made.
    c. meritless applications may be dealt with under case management procedures, but the court will be under a strict duty to assist any application or representation made by a protected party whether in person or through counsel.
    d. where a person who lacks capacity appoints a McKenzie friend the ordinary rules for McKenzie friends will apply and in addition the McKenzie friend will have automatic rights of audience.
    e. in considering a finding of incapacity of any party no court or tribunal may consider expert witness evidence that is to the effect that the party lacks capacity unless that expert is instructed solely by the party alleged to lack capacity or solely by the court or tribunal.

    3. Right to Independent Expert

    At present there are fears that experts may be subject to what academics call ‘repeat player prejudice’. Simply put, expert witnesses get a lot of work from councils and may not wish to upset them for fear of losing future work.

    a. it is proposed that in any proceedings where capacity is an issue, where a public authority’s expert opinion is disputed the Court will instruct its own expert and include in that instruction any factual assertions made by the protected party.
    b. the protected party will be allowed further opinions at a reasonable interval. E.g, once every 6 months in the first 12 months, and once a year thereafter.

    4. Inspection Regime

    Inspection regimes need to be quick, simple and fair. Punishments need to be harsh but only imposed on the guilty as a system will only deter wrong doing and encourage best practise if it accurately identifies both.

    a. self assessment of all care homes and services should end.
    b. the CQC should publish mandatory care standards (e.g. cleanliness of toilets, food, availability of activities, complaints procedures etc.)
    c. all inspections should be unannounced.
    d. inspectors should be able to impose spot fines. Private providers care about money. Appeals should be to the First Tier Tribunal.
    e. inspectors should have the power to infiltrate and film in care providers in the same way as Panorama did. If the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act needs to be changed then let it be changed.
    f. the CQC should be given power and duty to prosecute for offences under section 44 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. This power and duty should also given to the police, but not to local authorities. Local authorities should only have the power to refer offences under section 44 to the police or to the CQC.
    g. the CQC should be given the power and duty to refer professionals for fitness to practise hearings if their inspections uncover serious wrongdoing.
    h. private sector care providers should be given a tax break if they avoid any spot fines in a financial year.

    5. Complaints Procedures

    Human beings make mistakes. They cling to them often out of fear of punishment or disadvantage if they admit to the original error. This is the root of most disputes with councils. Public body complaints procedures often do not work because there is no incentive in complaints procedures to settle early. There must be an incentive to acquiesce to complaints and a disincentive to deal with complaints poorly.

    a. Where a complaint to a public body is made and the body promptly accepts that complaint and rectifies the problem in a manner satisfactory to the claimant then there should be a reward in terms of limited protection from punishment.

    i. The body should be exempt to the first £5,000 of a claim for damages arising from any non-pecuniary loss.
    ii. That any professional involved should not be referred to fitness to practise proceedings for negligence. No such immunity would apply for malice and misconduct (e.g. abuse).

    b. Where a complaint to a public body is made and not accepted and a claim for damages is successful then a court may have the power to increase the damages by up to 25%. This is not punitive but instead reflects the cost to the court system of public sector obstinacy. The court will be required to consider the thoroughness, reasonableness and independence of the process used to consider the complaint.

    So for example in the Neary case had the council caved in to Mr Neary’s first complaint then the council would have received immunity to the first £5,000 of a claim for damages in distress and a presumption that the mistakes of the professionals were minor and should be overlooked absent other evidence. This would have given them a strong incentive to consider the case carefully and fix the problems much earlier.

    Impact Assessment.

    The current framework for the Court of Protection imposes fabulous legal costs on local authorities, whether they be right or wrong in any given case. By simplifying CoP procedures and requiring only solicitors, legal costs for councils and other public bodies will be substantially reduced and can be spent on improving care. Accessibility for clients will also be improved.

    Private sector care providers care about money. Spot fines are a quick easy way to deal with problems. Tax breaks for a clean report will make sure that care managers worry about standards.

    Public sector complaints procedures are often meaningless because they tend to rely on human beings admitting to mistakes. Giving an incentive to settle matters quickly will radically improve matters.

    Sam Smith.

    Edited by Anna to add: Do please take the opportunity to comment, and forward it on to anyone you know who has an interest in these matters – it will be going before the Minister. It is an excellent opportunity to put your point of view – and good work by Sam smith, who has been a diligent campaigner.

    { 22 comments more }https://annaraccoon.com/2011/06/15/protecting-the-vulnerable/

  268. Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 13:31, len lawrence wrote:

    To: Sir Jonathan Jones
    HM Procurator General, Permanent Secretary, Government Legal Department.

    Re: His Honour Judge Simon Oliver appointed President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    Dear HM Procurator General.

    My request to Government Legal Services, Matrix Chambers and Worshipful Brother His Honour
    Judge Simon Oliver to withdraw the false allegations made against me in HHJ Simon Oliver’s Civil
    Action against Mr. Javed Sheikh has been stonewalled.

    Mr Sheikh please find attached an extract from a court hearing at Reading County Court when
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver announced his appointment as President of the Queen’s Bench
    Division. It is still not known how many cases HHJ Simon Oliver heard at Reading County Court
    in the mistaken belief that he was President of the Queen’s Bench Division.

    It is also known that prior to hearing my case on the 16 April 2012 His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    was fully aware that I was a Court of Protection patient. HHJ Simon Oliver disregarded this and
    without a Court of Protection authorisation proceeded to hear the application for permission to
    appeal when permission was not required.

    How many Court of Protection hearings has HHJ Simon Oliver heard over a four year period, prior
    to his appointment on the 7 October 2015 to the Court of Protection, is also still unknown.

    The Ministry of Justice, HMCTS and The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) has been fully
    aware of what has been occurring at Reading County Court. The matter is compounded given that
    on February 2018 Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary announced in a report that THAMES
    VALLEY POLICE are failing to record more than 35,000 crimes per year, including serious crimes such
    as rape, sexual offences, domestic violence. This is in addition to an earlier Crime Data Integrity
    inspection in 2017 detailing that vulnerable victim’s crimes were not being recorded.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  269. I heard a rumour where he once claimed he was the managing director of weight watchers.

  270. Racketeering and asset stripping is the reason state agents refuse to properly safeguard the elderly and vulnerable.

    Lord Hardie (House of Lords): “The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being wilfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them.
    https://www.anthonycollins.com/newsroom/ebriefings/deprivation-of-liberty-safeguards-not-fit-for-purpose/

  271. Former Tory justice minister to chair independent JR review

    By Monidipa Fouzder31 July 2020

    The government has today followed up on its 2019 manifesto commitment to end the ‘abuse’ of judicial review by announcing the launch of an independent review to be chaired by a former Conservative justice minister.

    Lord chancellor Robert Buckland said judicial review protects citizens from an ‘overbearing state’. The independent review ‘will ensure this precious check on government power is maintained, while making sure the process is not abused or used to conduct politics by another means’.

    Latest civil justice statistics show that the Ministry of Justice had the most judicial reviews lodged against any department or public body in 2019: 1,100, down 7% on 2018. The Home Office had the second largest number – 976, down 17% on 2018. Of the 3,400 judicial review applications received last year, 1,600 were civil immigration and asylum applications, 1,600 were civil (other) and 170 were criminal.

    For the review, a six-strong panel will consider: whether the terms of judicial review should be written into law; whether certain executive decisions should be decided on by judges; which grounds and remedies should be available in claims brought against the government; and any further procedural reforms such as timings and the appeal process.

    Source: Mary Turner – The Times

    The panel will be chaired by Lord Faulks QC (Edward Peter Lawless Faulks), who served as a justice minister under David Cameron from January 2014 until July 2016. Parliament’s website states that he has been non-affiliated since 30 July 2019.

    Faulks said: ‘I am delighted to have been asked to chair the Independent Review of Administrative Law. The panel will bring a wide range of experience and opinion to this important subject. Together we will examine judicial review and the need to strike a balance between the right of citizens to challenge government through the courts and the elected government’s right to govern.’

    The other panel members are: Professor Carol Harlow QC, Vikram Sachdeva QC, Professor Alan Page, Celina Colquhoun, and Nick McBride.

    Harlow is an Emeritus professor of law at LSE. Sachdeva is chair of the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association. Page’s previous roles include specialist adviser to the Scottish Parliament’s Scotland Bill committee. Barrister Colquhoun specialises in planning and environmental law. McBride is a fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge.

    The ministry says the panel will report back later this year. Any recommendations will be considered by Buckland and Michael Gove, chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster and Cabinet Office minister.

    Dr Joe Tomlinson, research director at Public Law Project, told the Gazette: ‘Judicial review exists to help ensure that public authorities act lawfully and that citizens are treated fairly and according to the law. Any process of reform is, therefore, a very serious undertaking.

    ‘It is right that the government has highlighted the importance of examining data and evidence as part of this review. There is, however, at present a notable deficit in relevant, authoritative data about judicial review, both in terms of procedure and judicial decision-making.

    ‘Evidence-based policymaking – for which this government has repeatedly stated its support – demands high standards in terms of evidence and data, and requires serious reflection and consideration, particularly where it relates to issues of such constitutional significance. It will be important that this process of reform identifies where evidence gaps exist and ensures that steps are taken to acquire the necessary data.’

    The choice of a former Conservative minister to chair the independent review has attracted some adverse comment on social media. The Secret Barrister tweeted: ‘Lord Faulks QC was the right-hand minister to Chris Grayling at the MoJ from 2014, when legal aid was obliterated and Grayling was attempting to restrict judicial review, branding it “a promotional tool for left-wing campaigners”.

    ‘There’s nothing like an impartial tribunal.’

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/former-tory-justice-minister-to-chair-independent-jr-review/5105251.article

    Anonymous
    Commented on:31 July 2020 11:34am

    And in other news Count Dracula has been appointed to be in charge of the Blood Bank.

  272. Appointment of the Master of the Rolls
    31 July 2020 |News

    The Prime Minister’s Office have announced that Her Majesty The Queen has been pleased to approve the appointment of The Rt. Hon. Sir Geoffrey Vos as the Master of the Rolls from 11 January 2021. This appointment will follow the retirement of Sir Terence Etherton.

    The Master of the Rolls is the second most senior judge in England and Wales after the Lord Chief Justice. As President of the Court of Appeal’s Civil Division the Master of the Rolls is responsible for the deployment and organisation of the work of the judges of the division as well as presiding in its courts, often hearing the most complex cases across the full range of civil, family and tribunal matters.

    The Master of the Rolls is Head of Civil Justice, and as such is Chair of the Civil Justice Council and Civil Procedure Rule Committee, with responsibility for the development and oversight of the wider civil justice system.

    The position dates to at least the 13th century. Reflecting the role’s historic roots, but also the ongoing importance of public access to records and data for the rule of law, the Master of the Rolls is Chair of the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives.

    Biography

    Sir Geoffrey Vos was called to the Bar in 1977, and took silk (QC) in 1993. He was appointed as a Justice of the High Court assigned to the Chancery Division in October 2009. Between 2005 – 2009 he was a Judge of the Courts of Appeal of Jersey and Guernsey, and a Judge of the Court of Appeal of the Cayman Islands between 2008 and 2009. He sat as a Deputy High Court Judge from 1999 until 2009. He was the Chairman of the Bar Council in 2007. He became President of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary in January 2015.

    He was appointed as a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2013 and became Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales on 24 October 2016.

    Appointment of the Master of the Rolls

  273. Hi, i am surprised reading all these allegations on this website about HHJ Simon Oliver. His Honour was very professional in my hearing and had the most professional conduct during my litigation. He was respectful, accomodating and his orders were always error free and barely required amendments. An absolute privilege to have his honour hear my case. Everyone here is bonkers to say otherwise. Most seem to have drug and alcohol problems who cannot accept his honours criticisms.
    No need to reply
    Regards

  274. You must be a bit more than a publisher if you know when judicial orders are “error free and rarely requiring amendments”. How on earth would you ever know without meeting someone whether they had drug and alcohol problems? It’s seems to me that you are the one who is bonkers. How many court cases have you put before Simon Oliver to acquire such impressive expertise?

  275. Hi
    Was he acting as a family judge or the president of the Queens Bench Division? We wonder why you had such a positive experience? May we ask what gift you gave him? Or what Freemason lodge your in? Or even better, what solicitors or barristers firm you work for? It may explain a lot! Please don’t come here and bash other victims when you have your own hidden agenda. Your a bit late in the day to be sticking up for HHJ Simon Oliver. We think we would rather consider 2300 comments then one delusional from you.
    Best regards

  276. Corruption, duplicity major challenge in UK: Swraj Paul

    Terming corruption a ‘major challenge’ facing Britain, prominent industrialist Swraj Paul on Monday came down heavily on the ‘cosy and sleazy’ practices of institutions that are supposed to act fairly and treat equally in society.
    world

    Updated: Nov 25, 2014 17:02 IST

    Prasun Sonwalkar
    Hindustan Times

    Terming corruption a ‘major challenge’ facing Britain, prominent industrialist Swraj Paul on Monday came down heavily on the ‘cosy and sleazy’ practices of institutions that are supposed to act fairly and treat equally in society.

    Swraj, who is chairman of the Caparo Group, stepped down as the chancellor of the University of Westminster, had a ‘special word’ for graduating students during his last address at the graduation ceremony here.

    “To my mind, the major challenge facing Britain today is the social disease of corruption that has plagued this country possibly for decades. Only now is it being exposed. When the truth emerges – as I hope it will – I believe it will have a seismic effect on British society,” he said.

    Paul added: “Cozy and sleazy establishment practices have for too long exerted an undue and malign influence on the very institutions that are expected to protect us; institutions that are supposed to see that we are all treated equally and fairly. In many instances the watchdogs of society have become the predators, or allowed predators a free hand”.

    Activities such as those of financial institutions and their practices, or the more recently uncovered implications that paedophilia rings had ‘shamefully’ operated for years at high levels, diminished British society and its system of government, Paul said.

    “British financial institutions were once perceived as world leaders in integrity. Now they are seen as world leaders in duplicity.

    While they are all still clamouring for their huge salaries and bonuses, not one person in the financial world has even apologised to the millions of people who were badly affected by the banking crisis six years ago”, he added.

    A member of the House of Lords, Paul had strong words for parliamentarians too.

    “Our Parliamentarians and those who hold public office are the professed defenders of our morality. Yet it seems that immorality has been condoned at the highest levels. Public trust in the pillars of our society has steadily eroded. A nation which tolerates this kind of malfeasance is a nation destined for decline,” he said.

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/bytedance-says-faces-complex-difficulties-accuses-facebook-of-plagiarism/story-I2JUW2hNDpJnpATRvgmcaM.html

  283. The part transcript here displayed is from my case not that of the person claiming it; The posting was not authorised by myself and I do not know the author.

    There is a pending court case in which this transcript will feature.

  284. Dear John Abbott, sorry for the typos, yes this is your transcript and not mine. I was referring to the fact that hhj simon oliver is not the president but just a measily family judge!

  285. I heard a rumour that judge Simon Oliver once said that he was the performance director for the department of health and was in charge of combatting obesity in the UK

  286. Wake up people, Mr Sheikh did plan an anthrax attack of his honour judge Oliver, why would the High court and the publishers risk being sued in court if it wasn’t true? It was nothing to do with Mr Sheikh being Muslim, this is a card he is using to justify his position. As a doctor who works in the NHS, he has access to such chemicals which his honour could of had been used on him. His honour judge Oliver is lucky to be alive at the hands of this lunatic. Deport him end of.

  287. Dear Geoffrey

    I have been informed about your comment above and thought i would clarify my position.

    Firstly, i never plotted any Attack on Simon Oliver. THIS IS A CARD HE IS USING TO JUSTIFY HIS OWN POSITION AS A VICTIM. Have you wondered why he never reported it to the police? I know i reported it to the police that he falsely accused me.

    Secondly, Simon Oliver is known to be lying regularly in court. I don’t think this requires any kind of input from me because it’s quite obvious. It’s a shame people like you use victim bashing as an agenda to stick up for man who does not even have control of his own marital life, let alone what he does in court.

    Thirdly, it is not possible to get anthrax or any sort of chemicals which is used for terrorism in any capacity from an NHS hospital. Please go back to skool and lurn sumfing this time.

    Fourth, before you come up on this website or anywhere on the internet for that matter and use my name in a negative stance, get your facts straightened out. If you can’t speak the truth about me, don’t say anything at all. I dedicated my life in the NHS to save other people’s lives including delusional ones like yourself. I don’t think Simon Oliver will have a care in the world about anyone else’s life. If you think he does, go to him next time you fall ill and see what he does.

    Fifth, Simon Oliver has already admitted in point 32 of his witness statement in the High court that the allegations that I made against him taking a bribe in the Upper Tribunal oral hearing was in fact correct. Simon Oliver said that the contents of the hearing that is mentioned on the main article of this site are only known to the people who were physically present in the Upper tribunal oral hearing. Therefore, he is admitting that his judgement he made was FALSE! This is now a fact

    Finally, tell your mother not to take drugs or alcohol during her pregnancy so that she does not have spastic kids like yourself who make retarded comments on the internet about innocent people.

    Sincerely
    Mr Sheikh

  290. Sir Jonathan Jones QC
    HM Procurator General,
    Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Profession and Crown’s Nominee
    Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department.

    Dear HM Procurator General,

    THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION

    Thank you for your Private Office number 020 72×0 3xx2.

    If I become the subject of any further bullying by lawyers within Government Legal Service I will contact your
    private office immediately.

    Thank you

    Leonard Lawrence

  291. Simon Oliver’s staff at Reading court did not even like him. They considered him stuck up. His attitude was just as bad to the staff in the admin then it is to litigants that are in front of him

  292. Chief Executive Rachel Holmes, Matrix Chambers
    Barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers

    Would you like to inform the those below of the latest false allegations that Worshipful Brother
    HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No.3684 has made against me. My request that my
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver withdraws the false allegations were stonewalled.

    WBo Anthony Howlett-Bolton, The Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire
    WBro Laurence Fretwell, Provincial Grand Secretary
    BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE, NO.3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA,
    United Kingdom
    ProvGSec@berkspgl.org.uk

    Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers you may wish to inform Mr. Justice Julian Knowles and
    Mr. Justice Matthew Nicklin before tomorrows judgement that HHJ Simon Oliver is accurate on
    one point; he has been under surveillance, both inside and outside of Freemasonry.

    To quote from the PROLOUGH page XV, Death of a Hero, Captain Robert Nairac GC
    He had, as one of his officers said, ‘stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’.

    Leonard Lawrence

  293. My take is why is Simon Oliver got an extra large sunbed at the end of his back garden under his tree. Does his fat ass require the extra large one or does he take one of those rent boys back to his place so that his wife can watch them play with each other on the swing

  294. So Thames Valley Police do not know any wrong doings going on in Reading court? You bet your arse they have known all along! Its impossible for them to not have known with the immense support they have given Oliver in the past. They been screwing everyone everywhere at the judicial jokes request

    SHAME ON THE FREEMASONS

  295. Len
    Can you tell me if Freemasons are supposed to be criminals? Its difficult to tell these days with his truly involved in so much of it.
    Kind regards

  296. Len
    Can you tell me if Freemasons are supposed to be criminals?
    —————————————————————————–
    Dear AR

    I believe that the vast majority of Freemasons are not criminals.

    However, not all freemasons are sincere. When these individuals are identified they are invited
    to resign, otherwise they will be kicked out. It all boils down to being a good person and obeying
    the rules of society.

    Another reason for resignation is if Brethren request a letter of demit – in other words, they resign
    their membership. This occurred with some of the members of the London Masonic Lodge that I
    had belonged to, who resigned together with other freemasons. The trigger for the resignations was
    the misconduct of the Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver and those that sought to defend him.

    Provincial Executive Berkshire Freemasonry consists of the following:
    Provincial Grand Master Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Deputy Provincial Grand Master
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master
    Provincial Senior Grand Warden
    Provincial Junior Grand Warden
    Provincial Grand Secretary
    Provincial Grand Director of Ceremonies

    The Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire is the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton OBE.
    The Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton I believe was a Chief Superintendent, Thames Valley Police
    Reading, and later a Deputy Chief Constable in the Bedfordshire Police.

    With such a did distinguish police career the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton should easily be able
    to review Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver conduct. However, I believe that my electronic
    communication (emails) to the Rt WBr Anthony Howlett-Bolton are being blocked.

    Dr. David Staples, Chief Executive & Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE)
    has been made aware of Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver conduct by the former Worshipful
    Master of my former Masonic Lodge in London. Dr. David Staples is senior to the Rt WBr Anthony
    Howlett-Bolton so the responsibility rests with Dr. David Staples and not Rt WBr Howlett-Bolton.
    Dr. David Staples’s office is blocking my emails.

    Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver has certainly divided the following:
    1. Freemasons
    2. Police Officers (including those in Thames Valley Police)
    3. The Ministry of Justice
    4. Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service
    5. Court Staff at Reading County Court
    6. The Civil Court of Appeal
    7. The Queens Bench Division
    8.The Crown Prosecution Services.
    9. Judges
    10. Barristers
    11. Solicitors
    12. The Civil Court of Appeal
    13. THE BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE, NO.3684
    14. Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA.

    SURVEILLANCE AND INTELLIGENCE-GATHERING OPERATIONS- COVERT SURVEILLANCE
    He had, as one of his officers said, ‘stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’.

    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver’s litigation regarding this website judges behaving badly
    was, I understand, authorised and then financed by someone very senior within the Ministry of
    Justice, who may have very recently left. What has not been explained is how the written judgement
    of Mr Justice Julian Knowles appeared on Matrix Chambers website more than a week prior to Mr
    Justice Julian Knowles judgement being handed down in the Queens Bench Division. Perhaps
    Mr Justice Nicklin, Media and Communications List, could enquirer.

    WHILST I AWAIT THE POLICE TO ACTION THE REQUEST FROM THE CROWN PROSECUTION
    SERVICE THAT I BE VISITED, HHJ SIMON OLIVER I CAN NOW EVIDENCE THAT PRIOR TO YOU
    HEARING MY CASE AT READING COUNTY COURT OF THE 16 APRIL 2013 YOU HAD KNOWN THAT
    I WAS A COURT OF PROTECTION PATIENT, BUT YOU WENT AHEAD AND HEARD THE APPLICATION
    AND MADE A JUDGEMENT WHEN YOU DID NOT HOLD A COURT OF PROTECTION AUTHORISATION.

    I SUGGEST THAT IS WHY YOU TELEPHONED MY BARRISTER AFTER THE HEARING AND HE THEN
    WITHDREW FROM MY CASE, EVEN WHEN YOU WERE INSTRUCTED TO SEND MY CASE TO THE CIVIL
    COURT OF APPEAL. I SUGGEST THAT YOU NEVER INFORMED MASTER MARIA BANCROFT-RIMMER
    CIVIL COURT OF APPEAL OF THE ABOVE.

    WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW SIMON WAS THAT LORD JUSTICE RUPERT JACKSON EMAILED MR JUSTICE
    JACKSON AT THE COURT OF PROTECTION. MY WORSHIPFUL BROTHER SIMON OLIVER WAS SETTING
    ME UP FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER AT THE COURT OF APPEAL!

    EXACTLY HOW MANY COURT OF PROTECTION CASES YOU HEARD AT READING COUNTY COURT
    BETWEEN 2012 AND THE 7 OCTOBER 2015 HAS STILL TO BE ESTABLISHED. SOME OF YOUR VICTIMS
    HAVE CLOSE ASSOCIATIONS WITH HM FORCES [LIKE MYSELF] AND THE POLICE SERVICE. WE
    HAVE ALL LOST OUR HOMES AND SOME THEIR CHILDREN AS WELL!

    LEONARD LAWRENCE
    CC Mr Justice Nicklin, Media and Communications List
    Mr Justice Julian Knowles

  297. Look what i found. What Simon wants, Simon gets.
    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2020/2253.html
    Sad this is what Simon has lowered himself to. Im sure Ben Silverstone/Matrix chambers had a copy of this judgement before the hand down date just like they did with Knowles judgement. The sad thing is Nicklin J has been satisfied to the criminal standard on an allegation! Looks like we need to revisit Freemasonry

  298. I think i found a video of Nicklin J and Oliver on YouTube. Its very interesting and explains what’s been going on all this time

  299. Justice Matthew Nicklin QC’s judgement is a slap in the face of every single one of Simon Olivers victims! What we have here is a very well connected network which is doing everything in their power to name and shame a doctor to save Simon Olivers reputation. All paid from public monies. Thousands of victims have spoken and we have all been called liars by Justice Nicklin QC. Can someone send this judgement to the attorney general with a brief description of Whats going on as i don’t know how to do it. Best if many people can send it. No point in going to the judiciary considering we are all “liars”.

  300. UNLIKE IN THE UK, IT LOOKS LIKE NORTH AMERICAN POLICE DO THE JOB THAT THE TAXPAYER EXPECTS OF THEM – WELL DONE LADS! WE NEED PROPER POLICE IN THE UK.

    https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/business-news/disbarred-fredericton-lawyer-wanted-on-canada-wide-warrant-arrested-in-ontario/332758?utm_source=GA&utm_medium=20200828&utm_campaign=CLW-Newsletter-20200828&utm_content=FCA5CA79-7EDF-4343-ACE2-4DD92B79D490&tu=FCA5CA79-7EDF-4343-ACE2-4DD92B79D490

    Disbarred Fredericton lawyer wanted on Canada wide warrant arrested in Ontario

    Former deputy attorney general of New Brunswick Yassin Choukri arrested Wednesday night

    By The Canadian Press
    27 Aug 2020

    FREDERICTON — A former deputy attorney general of New Brunswick who was wanted by police for allegedly committing fraud has been arrested in Ontario.

    Fredericton police spokeswoman Alycia Bartlett says Yassin Choukri, who was the subject of a Canada-wide warrant, was arrested Wednesday night by Peel Regional Police and is in custody.

    Bartlett said today plans are being made to return Choukri to New Brunswick to answer to the fraud charges.

    Police issued the arrest warrant for the 53-year-old on Aug. 14, on seven counts of indictable fraud over $5000 and on one count of indictable fraud under $5000.

    Choukri, appointed deputy attorney general by former premier Bernard Lord, was disbarred from his Fredericton law practice in 2017.

    The move followed a disciplinary hearing by the Law Society of New Brunswick that determined he had misappropriated more than $720,000 from 10 former clients over several years.

    Choukri disappeared from New Brunswick several years ago and police say his last known address was in the Greater Toronto Area.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 27, 2020.

  301. REMEMBERING LOVED ONES
    Peter Harris, 83: Official solicitor in the Fred West case and children’s welfare expert
    Saturday August 29 2020, 12.01am BST, The Times
    Peter Harris also served in the navy

    It is the duty of the official solicitor to step in and act on behalf of those unable to appoint a solicitor, including children, prisoners and the dead. For Peter Harris, appointed to the role in 1993, the work largely covered child-abuse cases, including abduction by a parent, but in 1995 he became the administrator of the estate of the serial killer Fred West after he had committed suicide. West had started an autobiography while in prison awaiting trial for 12 murders, and Peter gave permission for the material to be used for a book. His aim was to divide its substantial profits among West’s younger surviving children. It was a bold and controversial move and not without its detractors.

    FULL STORY https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/peter-harris-83-official-solicitor-in-the-fred-west-case-and-children-s-welfare-expert-xz8f72ffg

  302. Hello everyone
    After reading the judgement of justice Matthew Nicklin QC did he not think that Oliver admitting in point 32 of his statement that the allegations are all correct? Simon Oliver is admitting all of these allegations are correct because he said in Dr Sheikes statement that this main article “is only known to the parties that were present at the oral hearing” in the upper tribunal in 2014? And this is why he believes it’s him. He provides a complaint letter written to justice William Charles as evidence but this complaint letter is not fact because it’s an unsigned document and Dr Sheike denies he wrote it. How did justice Matthew Nicklin QC take Simon Oliver’s allegation and accept it to the criminal standard is beyond belief. Investigations relating to Berkshire freemasonry need to initiate to get to the bottom as to why Simon Oliver can get an allegation proved to the criminal standard in the high court.

    Enquiries need to also be made with matrix chambers to determine whether they had a copy of this judgement prior to the hand down date as they have done so previously. I know a previous case when matrix chambers had a copy of the judgement before it was handed down by the court in a case involving Elton John.

  303. Strange you say that. I worked with Essex police and was informed of a case involving Michael Barrymore where in 2017, the High court wrote out a 28 page judgment and gave it to Mr John Beggs QC and Ms Cecily White (instructed by DAC Beachcroft) within 20 minutes.

  304. Well, I have to say that it seems unlikely that His Dishonour Injustice Oliver will ever face justice. The family courts are riddled with fraud, theft, injustice and the greedy lawyers all know it because most of them are part of what is in reality the biggest crime cartel in Europe. I was jailed by Hampshire police illegally and held in custody for 24 hours after I voluntarily travelled from the Far East to be interviewed by them in connection with crimes committed by my ex-wife who is a criminal and a violent habitual drug abuser. The circumstances of my arrest are that, having travelled to the UK at my own expense to give a statement, the police asked me to surrender my passport, which I did. The police then provided a solicitor for me and having given the police a statement with the solicitor present, the police said that they would take me back to my hotel. The solicitor then left and as soon as he had departed and whilst I was still within the police station, I was arrested and placed in a cell for 24 hours. I was allowed to make a phone call and I tried to contact the solicitor at the number on the business card he had given me, but he had turned his phone off. I then had to listen to a rambling diatribe from a police inspector who said I was being held “on suspicion” he didn’t tell me what the suspicion was. When I protested that I had travelled thousands of miles to give them a statement and that they had no grounds to arrest me the inspector laughed and said “I can do anything I want”. After 24 hours they let me go and handed me a letter saying that I was liable to prosecution should the find evidence against me, or words to that effect. They gave me back my belongings and passport and policeman drove me back to my hotel. I left the hotel as soon as I could pack and pay my bill. I left the UK as soon as I could and am now terrified that I will be arrested if I ever set foot in the UK again. Good luck with your attempts to reform the injustice system in the UK.

  305. The public is beginning to wake up to the fact that the country is run by a criminal cartel operating within the legal system. This, of course, includes police, lawyers, judiciary, corrupt social workers, councillors, court workers, bankers, insurance companies, and more. Most have found this hard to believe until they find themselves victims of this activity. Many of them have connections in secret societies, but all of them swear allegiance to each other, and not to the country, although people are beginning to ask if the head of this corruption is the reigning monarch, just as it has been throughout history. We hear nothing from her because, don’t forget, they are HER courts, HER constabularies, HER judiciary. Unless she speaks up against this rampant corruption, we may witness the end of the monarchy.

    We have so-called Christians such as Sir Andrew McFarlane who knows exactly what is going on and is a party to it, while, at the same time serving the church. Perhaps someone can enlighten us as to what part Christianity plays in all of this?

    THIS ACTIVITY MAY SHOCK YOU BUT IT IS THE MODUS OPERANDI OF FINANCIAL CRIMES THAT USE THE COURTS. Simon Oliver is a liar and all his cronies are in it up to their necks. The public is not going to stand for this any longer.

    WATCH AND LEARN, EVERYONE. Here are three decent people. Keep on speaking out about the dirty scum in the legal system and the criminals they work for.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EG7APWT9I4

  306. when anyone talks on the internet about the crimes that they commit, they take out all the resources to come and silence you. The UK ministry of justice is at the forefront of all of this and have wasted hundreds of millions of pounds trying to silence victims who speak out. Recently, Dr Shaikh has been the subject of a damaging vendetta by the High court who accused him of planning an anthrax attack against corrupt paedo judge Simon Oliver. The only thing that the police is doing is arresting the ones who are speaking on this site rather then arrest the man Oliver we are all talking about. It eventually comes to light that the judge everyone is talking about has a very good relationship with the police authorities. He regularly plays golf with them and goes to their Christmas parties. A dangerous ring to say the least

  307. To judges behaving badly

    I was puzzled why when on the 10 February 2014 Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver had alleged
    at Reading County Court that he had been appointed the President of the Queens Bench Division,
    Worshipful Brother Simon had chosen to instructed barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers,
    rather than a more senior barrister from Matrix Chambers, like a Queen’s Counsel.

    The case: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER [Claimant] v JAVED SHAIKH [Defendant], was heard by
    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES Queens Bench Division. Hearing dates: 29 November 2019

    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES Approved Judgment date 10/12/2019 contains 125 Points on 30 pages.
    My name (Leonard Lawrence) has not been disclosed but the false allegation against me was included.

    No explanation has been forthcoming as to how MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES Approved Judgment
    date 10/12/2019 containing 125 Points on 30 pages was posted on Matrix Chambers website 12 days
    earlier on the 29 November 2019, within hours of the hearing.

    Approved Judgment – Matrix Chambers
    http://www.matrixlaw.co.uk › 2020/01 › Oliver-v-Shaikh
    PDF
    Nov 29, 2019 – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER. Claimant. – and – …

    An email request to the Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive, Matrix Chambers, for an explanation of how
    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES Approved Judgment came to be posted on Matrix Chambers 12 days
    prior to the judgment being handed down on 10 December 2019 was declined.

    MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES was a founding member of Matrix when it was established in 2000
    and left around October 2017, to sit in the Queen’s Bench Division. It is not understood why barrister
    Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, omitted to disclose this to Mr. Javid Shaikh?
    ——————————————————————————–
    MR JUSTICE MATTHEW NICKLIN Media & Communications List
    The case has now been transferred to Mr. Justice Matthew Nicklin

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER [Claimant] v JAVED SHAIKH [Defendant]

    Mr. Shaikh thank you for posting me the Ministry of Justice and Matrix files in this case. They have been
    forwarded. I am advised that on one (maybe more) document in addition to barrister Benjamin Silverstone,
    name there is the name of a more senior barrister from Matrix Chambers, a senior Queen’s Counsel.

    Why has over £80,000 been authorised by someone at the Ministry of Justice on taking down this website?

    During Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver’s time at Reading County Court, WBr HHJ Simon Oliver was:

    1. KNOWINGLY HEARING COURT OF PROTECTION CASES WHEN HE WAS NOT AUTHORISED TO DO SO. THE
    MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND THAMES VALLEY POLICE KNEW THIS.

    2. WBr HHJ SIMON OLIVER WAS ALSO ACTING IN THE MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT HE WAS THE PRESIDENT
    OF THE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION. THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND THAMES VALLEY POLICE KNOW THIS.

    3. WHILST HHJ SIMON OLIVER WAS THE DESIGNATED FAMILY JUDGE (DFJ) AT READING COUNTY COURT
    A LOT OF UNPLEASANT EVENTS WERE OCCURING IN THE THAMES VALLEY POLICE AREA.

    22 AUG 2020 Sunday Mirror
    Abuse victim raped by hundreds of men from age of 12 sues authorities that failed her
    Speaking for the first time, Girl One tells the Sunday Mirror she:
    Was found by police at abusers’ flats at least 10 times – but claims it was her they threatened to arrest.
    Met social workers every week but says they dismissed her claims as lies.
    Testified in 2013 trial but claims police “dropped her like a stone” after the case.

    MR SHAIKH THERE IS SOMETHING UNPLEASANT ABOUT ANOTHER JUDGE (NOT HHJ OLIVER, JUSTICE
    KNOWLES OR JUSTICE NICKLIN) THAT HAS BEEN INVOLVED WITH YOUR CASE.

    Finally, there are even some Berkshire Freemasons and Thames Valley Police officers that clearly do not
    approve of what has been occurring in the Thames Valley Police area.

    I now have the documents that I seek.

    Leonard Lawrence

  308. What role do British judges play in serious organised crime, and who do they work with to facilitate it?

    Read, look, listen and learn about the criminals who have taken control of the legal system in the UK.

    http://www.intelligenceuk.com/newsx18_Michelle_Young_Fraud_Grant_Thornton_Judicial_Corruption.html

    Share widely. The public needs to know the truth about those whom we mistakenly trust to uphold the law, justice and fairness. There is none in the UK. It is all a false front.

    What say you, Sir Andrew? What say you, Ian from Essex?

  309. Ben Silverstone does not seem too enthusiastic about justice Nicklins court judgement. Just wondering how long he had the approved judgement before it was handed down.

    I was also wondering why Silverstone has been put on this case when he is just a junior barrister. Someone of Simon Oliver’s position would require at least someone who was a QC.

  310. I think you’re missing the point. Silverstone is just a fall boy for this litigation. He has been fed to the wolves without full knowledge of what he’s getting himself into. There is a QC involved who is advising in this case and his name is Tomlinson and he even wrote a book with Julian Knowles on serious organised crime. It’s funny eh, criminals colluding with each other to write a book on serious and organised crime. Hugh Tomlinson and Julian Knowles are actually very good friends with each other. The only reason Tomlinson is not coming forward because he is the go-to lawyer for the stars and he does not want to ruin his reputation

  311. I done a Google search on him and Hugh Tomlinson was Michael Barrymore’s lawyer in his litigation against Essex police

  312. Hugh Tomlinson represented Cilla Black and Victoria Beckham but hes not a very good lawyer because he keeps losing cases. Maybe Julian Knowles was not the judge so as to give him a favourable judgement. I am now beginning to wonder how many celebrities got a pre written judgement meaning they never deserved it in the first place.

  313. Simon Oliver must have a lot of dirt on a lot of people in government as well as in the ministry of justice and this is probably why the ministry of justice is financing the litigation for him to keep those dirty little secrets on becoming public. The British public already know about VIP paedophile rings but I’m sure that Simon Oliver can robe more people in if he does not get protected. Let’s see which judge in the courts comes to his rescue because that judge is probably involved in it as well.

  314. Of course the MoJ will cover him up, child abduction and freemasonry is hot topic and has to be covered up otherwise victims can unite. My child was also lost in the system and the only justice we get is the injustice’s. She was placed in care with known paedophiles with current cases pending. God bless Dr Shaikh for fighting these crooks.

  315. Hi
    I also came before Simon Oliver many years ago. The charade that he puts on, he puts on in such a way that he wants you to believe that you are in the wrong. He uses social services and cafcass and as many different agencies to get that job done. At first I thought I did not understand the law correctly and I was going mad. Speaking to other victims and reading comments on the internet makes it very clear that this isn’t a one-time fuck job but a regular occurrence in all the courts. No wonder people have lost confidence in the judges and the way they hand down their judgements. The courts are not a place to go and get justice but is a pay-to-play system. Everyone that is involved in it is part of the ring. To say that our taxpayers money has been financed like this is a joke. I’m sure we have wasted billions. I heard that Richard Heaton from the Ministry of Justice is permanent secretary and Jonathan Jones from the government legal department have been sacked by the Boris Johnson administration. Thank god that some justice has come out of all of this
    Kindest regards

  317. All these people that are dying because of the coronavirus and Simon Oliver is selfishly still here! What is wrong with some people

  318. bazley@1gc.com

    THE CHAMBERS OF STEPHEN COBB QC AND JANET BAZLEY QC
    1 GARDEN COURT CHAMBERS
    Barrister: Caroline Willbourne 1 Garden Court Chambers:
    Advice to the Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court (Laurence Oates) 15 September 2005
    Ref: Leonard Lawrence
    Incapable of legal discussion with the Official Solicitor or any solicitor instructed by him.

    STEPHEN COBB QC IS NOW MR JUSTICE STEPHEN COBB QC [HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION]

    THE CHAMBERS OF NICHOLAS FRANCIS QC
    29 BEDFORD ROW LONDON UK
    In late August 2005 the Chambers of Nicholas Francis QC (now Mr Justice Nicholas Francis QC
    sent four Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, to barrister Caroline Willbourne 1 Garden
    Court Chambers. These Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, were never disclosed to the Court
    of Protection by barrister Caroline Willbourne.

    NICHOLAS FRANCIS QC IS NOW MR JUSTICE NICHOLAS FRANCIS QC [HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION]

    The Bar Standards Board Director is alleging that the Bar Standards Board has been misled by barristers,
    I clearly was a Court of Protection patient.

    JANET BAZLEY QC
    Barrister Caroline Willbourne has refused to swear an affidavit supporting her false statement to the
    Bar Standards Board that I had recovered capacity proir to my home being sold in August 2005. The
    Court of Protection CP2 was not issued until February 2006.

    JANET BAZLEY QC
    WOULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH DETAILS OF BARRISTER CAROLINE WILBOURNE PROFESSIOAL
    NEGLIGENCE INSURENCE

    Leonard Lawrence

  319. Recovered Emails
    FTAO: bazley@1gc.com

    THE CHAMBERS OF STEPHEN COBB QC AND JANET BAZLEY QC
    1 GARDEN COURT CHAMBERS

    Barrister Caroline Willbourne 1 Garden Court Chambers:

    Advice to the Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court (Laurence Oates) 15 September 2005

    Ref: Leonard Lawrence

    Incapable of legal discussion with the Official Solicitor or any solicitor instructed by him

  320. Mr. Justice Julian Knowles and Mr. Justice Mathew Nicklin

    Recovered Emails from Government Legal Services.

    Why was the email below and many other emails deleted from my files?

    NOTE TO: Helen Clift (Official Solicitors office)
    FROM: James Beck (Official Solicitors office)
    RE: Leonard LAWRENCE
    DATE: 1 August 2005
    4. Obviously, the sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority.

    But SOLICITOR Helen CLIFT did authorised the sale of my home didn’t she Simon Oliver!

    Leonard Lawrence

  321. http://www.shyreman.com/deutsche.bank.epstein.html

    Well it turns out that Lord Chief Justice Sir Ian Burnett was covering up Deutsche Bank’s…
    gold and silver rigging,
    money laundering for the Russian Mafia
    money laundering for the Jeffrey Epstein ring,
    the murder of bankers with inside info on the Libor manipulation crimes
    the abuse of the Court of Appeal by Michael Cherney to launder money from Danske Estonia’s scam.

    Video coming soon.

  323. https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2020/07/28.jpg

    I am deeply concerned about Julian Knowles judgement being published on the matrix website 12 days before being handed down by the high court. I wonder if Ben Silverstone got permission from Mr Knowles to use the judgement before it was handed down and place it on his firm’s website! If not, this mounts to contempt of court and Mr Silverstone as well as a matrix chambers who have assisted in all of this to take place are all in contempt. What special relationship does Mr Silverstone and Mr Knowles have for the judgement to be uploaded onto the firm’s website before it being handed down. We should all enquire from the CEO of matrix whoever that is is because they are involved in all of this. Very amusing that they hold a contempt hearing when the original perpetrators are the one who are committing the contempt

  325. THIS GUY HAS A SENSE OF HUMOUR, DON’T YOU THINK?

    Speech
    Lord Chancellor’s Speech: Opening of the Legal Year Service

    Speech delivered by the Lord Chancellor at Temple Church for the Opening of the Legal Year Service.
    Published 2 October 2020

    From:
    Ministry of Justice and The Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP

    Delivered on:
    1 October 2020 (Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)

    The Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP

    It is such a pleasure to be here this evening, a pleasure especially given that we were only able to observe a scaled back service at Westminster Abbey earlier today to mark the opening of the legal year; I am grateful for this opportunity to thank so many of the judiciary and fellow lawyers as I would normally do in Westminster Hall.

    I am very pleased as well that so many people have been able to join us virtually, both here and internationally. The only shame of it is that you cannot enjoy the tranquil, reflective surroundings of this, the Temple Church. It is, for me as an Inner Templar, a very familiar place. Whenever I am here, I am reminded that we walk in the footsteps of others who, in many ways, faced the same challenges that we do today.

    As the order of service reminds us, William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke, is interred here at Temple. A loyal supporter of King John, Marshal counselled his monarch to sign Magna Carta and end his dispute with the barons. Indeed, his name appears in the original charter, to which those of us living in democracies today owe so much. Marshal stewarded the country through the turbulent end of the reign of John and the early years of the young Henry III – it is down to him that Magna Carta became more than just a quick fix by a desperate king to buy off rebellion.

    And as we walk into this church, we walk past the grave of John Selden, a celebrated jurist and parliamentarian in the 17th century and a fellow Inner Templar. Amongst his numerous contributions to law and politics, Selden was a key figure in a lively dispute with the Dutch in the 1620s concerning international maritime law. Some things you might think never really change!
    The Rule of Law

    As a new legal year begins, my mind turns to the enduring success of our legal system over the centuries, with judicial independence and the Rule of Law at its heart.

    When I took my oath of office in both English and Welsh, I swore to uphold and respect these principles. Principles which act as guardians of fairness in our society. In many ways, my role is right at the frontline, where the law meets policy and policy meets the law. There will be tensions at times, which can be frankly, difficult to resolve. Those observing, who aren’t privy to all the swirling issues, are naturally and understandably tempted to come to hard and fast conclusions. In my judgement, that can lead to error. When I sat as a part-time judge, I quickly learned that not every ruling that I was asked to make needed to be made at once, and that the fairness of proceedings was enhanced by making key decisions at just the right moment as the evidence progressed.

    That is what I apply to my work as Lord Chancellor now. As Lord Chancellor I will of course tackle sensible criticism head on but, ultimately, my focus will remain on discharging my duties in accordance my oath. And when it comes to the professions – barristers, solicitors, legal executives – it is right and proper for practitioners to make the strongest cases possible and do their utmost for their clients within the confines of the law. Sometimes a lawyer will find the argument they advance to be at odds with the Government of the day – but it frankly it is a strength of our mature democracy underpinned by the Rule of Law that such debates can occur.

    In a healthy democracy like ours it is inevitable that there will be criticism of both politicians and indeed of lawyers for the work they do. Sometimes that will be robust, tensions will arise, but it is wholly wrong for any professional to be threatened, harassed or worse, attacked simply for doing their job – we must call it out and deal with it. And make the point that those who attack people providing a professional service will be subject to that very same Rule of Law.
    The Coronavirus Pandemic

    That commitment to the Rule of Law was one of the driving forces behind the government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. As the true scale of the challenge became apparent, our primary concern was, of course, safety. The instinctive and understandable reaction might have been to halt the motors of justice – as many jurisdictions chose to do – but we were mindful that, in many instances, justice simply cannot wait; and that we were duty bound to keep the system moving as much as that was possible.

    There has been a gargantuan effort to achieve that – from utilising phone and video technology to allow many hearings to continue happening remotely; to putting in place the necessary social distancing measures, so that some hearings could continue to take place safely in person. I pay tribute to everybody concerned – from the judiciary and those who staff our courts, to those who use and practise within them – for your patience, your resilience and your sheer determination to keep the wheels of justice turning.

    We are also making progress across all jurisdictions, opening more rooms and adding capacity through Nightingale Courts.

    I am, however, as keenly aware as you are that the restrictions that continue to be in place – and could require tightening as the course of the pandemic changes – mean that we will need to do more. The scale of the challenge is unprecedented, even if the current volume of cases is not, and it could be necessary to look at further creative solutions in the future.
    A better system for a different future

    The response of the justice system to coronavirus has demonstrated something else that has been so critical to its success through the ages: its ability to change and to adapt in order to meet the needs of our society.

    The increased digitisation of our justice system was already a priority before the virus arrived, because we know that, in our modern world, many users want the option to access the courts as they access other types of services. Continuing to modernise the system will be crucial to safeguarding its ongoing success, which is why I announced in July a major £142m investment to boost technology across our system and to upgrade the court estate. I think it is important that we look at the period ahead not just as a recovery from the virus, but as a renewal for justice in our country. We can use it as an opportunity to improve the system for everyone who uses our courts and tribunals; to create a better system and to continue the tradition of England and Wales leading the way where other jurisdictions follow.

    This will make it possible to open up justice to more people and make our society fairer than it ever has been. That is what I believe is possible. There is no doubt that the time ahead of us looks very different than it did just a few short months ago, but I hope and trust we can all work together to realise a smarter justice system for what will be a very different future.

    Thank you for listening and I wish everyone here and further afield the very best wishes for the legal year ahead.
    Published 2 October 2020
    Explore the topic

    Crime, justice and law

    https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lord-chancellors-speech-opening-of-the-legal-year-service

    TULKINGHORN

  327. Hugh, Knowles, Silverstone, Nicklin all know each other from the News of the World phone hacking trial where all of them worked together, and all of them made a lot of money.

  329. https://youtu.be/Bq55P2NBAlM
    https://youtu.be/FvvOtR6lSNg
    Videos here revealing how Anshu Jain of Deutsche Bank used the Epstein blackmail ring to facilitate money laundering to Russian oligarchs. Oleg Deripaska used the Court of Appeal to launder money to Michael Cherney. LCJ Burnett would have known the court action was just a laundering vehicle. This is why in 2016 Burnett dismissed allegations of DB bullion audit fraud without a transcript of hearing – the audit fraud was to cover up the shipment of bullion and money to Russia – and the paper trail led directly into Burnett’s office. It also appears that the coroner’s inquest for William Broeksmit was corrupted by DB lawyers. Burnett, as head of the judiciary, in which the coroner functioned, would have authority to ensure the inquest is not corrected, because Jain was the man who would have ordered all references to Libor manipulation to be stripped from the coroner’s findings. DB ordered that the coroner strip a very suspicious suicide note that named Jain explicitly. Jain was accused by BaFin field agents of being the No 1 Kingpin of Libor manipulation in Germany by misleading the bundesbank on DB’s interbank lending rates.

  330. THE FORENSICS OF LEGAL FRAUD:

    People might like to be aware of the tricks that gangs of organised criminals – particularly those with law and accounting degrees – employ in order to steal people’s assets. These assets can include children and other close family members, and may involve the participation of corrupt medical and psychiatric professionals who are willing to sign false medical certificates in order to put people under the Court of Protection or the Official Solicitor.

    All over the world, people are being wrongly incarcerated or losing control of their affairs, due to this kind of corruption. In the UK, for example, a Nigerian Family – the Musa Family – had seven children taken from them and they, themselves, were wrongly imprisoned on the basis of lies told by a Haringey social worker. Later, once the children had had their names changed, and they had been permanently adopted, Justice Holman discovered that the social worker had lied. Despite his being prompted to do so, I have not heard that he took any steps to restore the children to their parents, and to pardon or compensate the Musas. On the contrary, they had served time in prison unlawfully, lost their children and all their assets, and been deported to Nigeria without their children or a penny in their pockets. They were then left to write pleading letter after pleading letter to David Cameron and others, only to be ignored. Mrs. Musa was a highly respected Christian minister.

    One basic well-used tactic is for dishonest participants in legal fraud to send out notices to their victims to attend court, either after the hearing has already taken place, or for the notice or summons to arrive without sufficient time to enable the respondent to attend the court hearing. As a consequence of this, the respondent fails to attend the court hearing and the judge, therefore, is free to find in favour of the crooks, the victim therefore loses his court case, and everything looks legitimate because nobody audits the file, and dates have been changed. There is NO legal requirement for a lawyer to prove that he or she sent out any notice to anyone. The legal system has been meticulously set up in such a way as to preclude any equality of arms.

    Documents used in crime and malpractice are not properly executed and sometimes they are even completely forged documents.There are rules that MUST be followed in litigation. These are known as Civil Procedure Rules. The dishonest parties deliberately do not follow them, and everyone who handles the paperwork, including the judiciary, simply turns a blind eye to any ‘irregularities’, surely knowing full well what is going on. These ‘irregularities’ can include, but are not limited to, completely fraudulent documents which are not prescribed for use by law. We have seen documents that have been mocked up with the wrong crown depicted in Her Majesty’s – or the Crown’s – logo. Total fiction.

    To commence a court case, the person bringing the case to court MUST file a a document and pay a filing fee to the court. The file is known as a CASEMAN (Case Management) File. It is assigned a number by the court and this document is used to open the file and commence proceedings. Without this initial document, and without the Caseman file and its assigned serial number, THE CASE DOES NOT EXIST because it should not, by law, proceed. Criminals are bypassing this step and not only stealing assets from the victim, but also stealing from the Treasury because court fees are not being collected.

    Documents involved in these fraudulent cases often do not have the prescribed Caseman file number, embossed court seal, the dates (or the dates are fictitious or documents are backdated). They often lack signatures and date and time stamps. No subsequent judge in the case will sign off the unsigned documents, but he will allow it to stand. Hearings are often held in courts that are not approved for that purpose, and often judges preside over cases that they are not authorized by law to preside over. Hearings are often postponed many times because the opposing party wants to wait until they have a “judicial friend’ sitting on the bench, so that they are sure to win the case.

    Many people are involved in this corrupt chain of events, in which Civil Procedure Rules are NOT followed in order to abuse the law and commit crimes in plain sight in the courts, BUT UNDER THE RADAR. It takes a whole chain of people who handle the paperwork to collude, turn a wilful blind eye, and participate in these joint criminal enterprises – which is what they truly are. They are not mistakes. The practices are widespread and not rarities.
    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules

    The last trick they will pull out of the hat, besides gagging orders to silence victims from exposing the crimes, is to declare the litigant a “Vexatious Litigant”, and deny them the right to continue their case in any court in the entire country. If they do persist, they risk being sectioned under mental health laws and locked up.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation
    https://www.cchr.org/cchr-reports/massive-fraud/introduction.html

    Hopefully, people will share this information on Twitter, and other social media sites. I refer you specifically to the following links. Here “legal fraud” and corruption in the justice system is illustrated and explained. Please take the opportunity to educate yourself. It is important that the public be aware of what has happened to the ‘great’ British legal system. It is suggested that you get your legal paperwork forensically examined,

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/ac2eb2g0l6f1awf/Forensics-of-Legal-Fraud-V1R2-v120110.pdf?dl=0

  331. SEE WHAT THEY SAY ON THIS WEBSITE https://carrolltrust.com/h-huntsman-sons-savile-row-bespoke-tailors-gerald-j-h-carroll-records-hrh-the-princess-marina-duchess-of-kent-and-george-5th-duke-of-sutherland-cps-criminal-standard-of-proof/

    “This source also confirmed that the world renowned Carroll Chair of Irish History attached to Hertford College Oxford University and the Carroll Institute academic research establishment have also been the “target” of the FBI Scotland Yard “named” Withersworldwide and Slaughter & May law firms crime syndicate which continues to operate in the tax havens of the Bahamas Gibraltar and the City of London with impunity.”

    “It has emerged that the Hugh 7th Duke of Westminster lawyers Boodle Hatfield executed forged and falsified lease documentation of the Belgravia residence to effectively impulse the seizure of the property and trigger the co-ordinated break-ins burglaries theft offences concerning the Carroll Institute archival records “centred around” one of the finest collections of Irish books and manuscripts in private ownership in the world.”

    There is more…..this case is a classic example of the LEGAL MAFIA in operation.

    Slaughter and May …TUT TUT

  332. Does any one know if Simon Oliver is still on duty as a judge? Haven’t heard too many new child abduction stories in a while? Just wondering if he has found religion or gone into hiding under that septic stone of his.

  334. ……..and did Matrix Chambers also publish THIS document two weeks before the judgment was published by the court, as they are wont to do?

  335. Nah, it was published on bailii before the hearing commenced yesterday. I checked it at 10am and it was there. That’s still 60 minutes before the hearing commenced. Appears pre-written as expected.

  336. 16 months custodial sentence because Simon Oliver gives his word. No wonder the public have zero confidence in judges, This order is evidence of it #shamejustice. We have been accusing them of being corrupt for a long time and now they have just proved it again. I found it amusing when Nickling said ‘Simon Oliver is also a citizen’. Is he saying that we are not citizens when we have our children stolen. It goes to show you that Simon Oliver is a very dangerous man, not only does he steal your children but he can even take your life and justify it

  337. From: len lawrence
    Sent: 08 October 2020 01:19
    To: Louisa Lloyd-Jones; Ben Silverstone
    cc: Navy Command Secretariat

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones
    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team
    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department
    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL
    | DX 123243 Westminster 12
    Louisa.Lloyd-Jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,

    Do I need to get this image embroidered/printed (30mm square) onto my Royal Navy tie?
    It may afford me some protection from Mr. Justice Matthew Nicklin, barrister Ben Silverstone
    and Matrix Chambers in the future.

    I did make repeated requests that the false allegations made against me by HHJ Simon Oliver
    be removed, but no one listened.

    Your client will be receiving “A coup de grâce” in the form of a letter from Richard Anelay QC
    Deputy High Court Judge, leading family and criminal law barrister, and the former head of
    1 King’s Bench Chambers rather than the £10,000 I was told to pay by Simpson Millar Solicitors!

    This will be followed by a printout from the Thames Valley Police computer, of an internal police
    review, the findings of which had been denied to me. Finally, communications from the office of
    the Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox QC (The now-former Attorney General) with assistance from the Crown
    Prosecution Service and the Ministry of Justice.

    Yours most sincerely

    Leonard Lawrence

    Hear Nothing, See Nothing, Say Nothing.
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road
    Sindlesham
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

  338. To: Len Lawrence
    Subject: GSD Assistance Dogs Picture.jpg
    The newly qualified Assistance Dogs Len, just like your Kira.
    Fantastic picture.

    Dear Worshipful Brother Cdr…,

    Thank you, Worshipful Brother for the picture.
    You met my former German Sheppard Neurological Assistance Dog Kira.
    Sadly Kira died and I no longer have an assistance dog, and I am shortly to become a homeless Royal
    Navy veteran again for the fifth time, thanks to Berkshire Freemason WBro HHJ Simon Oliver.

    The former Provincial Grand Secretary of Berkshire Freemasonry, Worshipful Brother David Keys,
    should be able to explain why I no longer have, or have funding for, a replacement Neurological
    Assistance Dog or a home.

    Worshipful Brother David Keys is a member of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver’s Berkshire Masters
    Lodge No.3684. Worshipful Brother David Keys can be contacted at the address below:

    C/O WBro Laurence Fretwell, Provincial Grand Secretary
    Or WBo Anthony Howlett-Bolton, The Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire
    BERKSHIRE MASTERS’ LODGE, NO.3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham RG41 5EA,
    United Kingdom ProvGSec@berkspgl.org.uk

    Chief Executive Rachel Holmes, Matrix Chambers and/or barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix
    Chambers, can explain the latest false allegations that Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver,
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No.3684 has made against me. My request that my Worshipful Brother
    HHJ Simon Oliver withdraws the false allegations were stonewalled.

    Barrister Benjamin Silverstone, Matrix Chambers may wish to inform Mr Justice Julian Knowles
    and Mr Justice Matthew Nicklin that Simon Oliver is accurate on one point; he has been under
    surveillance both inside and outside of Freemasonry.

    To quote from PROLOUGH page XV, Death of a Hero Captain Robert Nairac, George Cross
    He had, as one of his officers said, ‘stuck his head in the tiger’s mouth’.

    Leonard Lawrence
    Royal Navy Veteran
    —————————————————————————-
    Gus Hales – Deep in my mind where nobody goes
    24 September at 21:04 ·

    GUS HALES Ex 9 Para Sqdn RE Class of 82, Falklands Veteran and PTSD sufferer.
    SOLDIERS ON THE STREETS
    “Forgive me for being a bit confused here Prime Minister, but when you say you are going to put
    soldiers on the streets, well correct me if I’m wrong, but they have been on the streets for years,
    thousands of them”.

    YES GUS, AND ON THE 30 AUGUST 2012 HHJ SIMON OLIVER WROTE THAT HE WAS ENTIRLY
    SATISFIED HOW I HAD BEEN TREATED.

  339. World Mental Health Day is observed on 10 October every year,

    Barrister Benjamin Silverstone,
    Matrix Chambers,
    Griffin Building,
    Gray’s Inn,
    London WC1R 5LN
    bensilverstone@matrixlaw.co.uk

    Dear Mr. Silverstone,

    The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles and Mr. Justice Matthew Nicklin

    Re: Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver

    The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles, practised with you at Matrix Chambers, prior to
    his appointment as a Justice of the High Court in October 2017.

    Approved Judgement Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB)

    Within hours of the hearing on the 29 Nov 2019 before The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles
    an Approved Judgement containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was posted on the Matrix
    Chambers website, more than ten days before the Approved Judgment was handed down by The
    Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles on the 10 December 2019.

    Rachel Holmes, Chief Executive of Matrix Chambers has declined to comment on the above.

    Mr. Silverstone, as Counsel to WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver would you explain the following:

    1. How did Matrix Chambers come to be in possession of The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles
    an Approved Judgement on the 29 Nov 2019, prior to The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles
    handing down his judgement on the 10 December 2019?

    2. Did The Honourable Mr. Justice Julian Knowles give his consent for his Approved Judgement to
    be posted on the Matrix chambers Website on the 29 Nov 2019, prior to The Honourable Mr.
    Justice Julian Knowles handing down his judgement on the 10 December 2019?

    Finally Ben,

    World Mental Health Day is observed on 10 October every year

    Would you and Matrix Chambers make available to me all allegations that your client The Provincial
    Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, has made against me including
    those about my Mental Health. I would also like sight of HHJ Simon Oliver’s medical qualifications.
    Professor Gordon Turnbull’s quallifications are below:

    Wing Commander Professor Gordon Turnbull FRCP FRCPsych Royal Air Force Rtd
    Consultant Advisor in Psychiatry to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)

    The Court of Protection Medical Certificate CP2 that WBr His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, chose not
    to disclose to the Court of Protection and Civil Court of Appeal in 2012 may refresh your clients faded
    memory.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  340. Barrister Benjamin Silverstone,
    Matrix Chambers,
    Griffin Building,
    Gray’s Inn,
    London WC1R 5LN
    bensilverstone@matrixlaw.co.uk

    World Mental Health Day is observed on 10 October every year,

    Psychology Today.
    “Bullying is a distinctive pattern of repeatedly and deliberately harming and humiliating others,
    specifically those who are smaller, weaker, younger or in any way more vulnerable than the bully”.

    The public has still to learn what occurred to me in 2012/13 after the court hearing before your client,
    WBr HHJ Simon Oliver, but they are going to. The treatment being inflicted upon Mr. Javid Sheikh
    mirrors what occurred to me within the Queen’s Bench Division and at Reading County Court.

    There has also been bullying within Thames Valley Police, above the rank of Chief Inspector. Whilst
    the Detective Superintendent hides in the background placing her junior officers in compromising
    and career limiting situations. It would appear the Detective Superintendent underestimated the
    integrity of her junior officers and civilian police staff.

    Maybe that is why she retired?

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

  343. Man who “probably” contacted Legal Futures pretending to be judge jailed for harassing him

    Len, Reading Matthew Nicklin QCs judgment, he uses the following words ‘could be’ ‘maybe’ ‘possibly’ ‘likely’ ‘most likely’ ‘probably’ and then concluding that he is satisfied on the criminal standard! Some people are just plain thick. I now want Matthew Nicklin QCs cases all reviewed now as well. Seems a big piss about taking place. Now you see what everyone is complaining about.
    Philip Durhan

  345. What has happened in this case is that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) have put Justice Matthew Nicklin QC in charge of this case in order to cover the whole matter up. The only people covering up Simon Oliver’s behaviour are the ones that are assisting him all along. Child abduction does exist, judges taking bribes does exist and judicial misconduct also exists. However, Justice Matthew Nicklins evidential threshold does not exist. If none of this exists, why did Len Lawrence have forged medical certificates in his case?

  347. And yet for others it is considered free speech…….Justice Julian Knowles 14 February 2020 full judgement in the case of Miller vs College of Policing and Chief Constable of Humberside
    “Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative (descriptor for profanity and abuse) …”
    https://archive.org/details/doublethink/page/n7/mode/2up

  348. The county council was aware at the time, Verdan confirmed, of Greville Janner’s “association” with a child. Concerns had been raised by staff but they were not acted upon
    Stanage said his clients were grateful the inquiry was going ahead despite attacks on it by Janner’s son, Daniel Janner QC, who had “vilified” the inquiry “day after day”.
    IICSA’s earlier investigations into allegations of sexual abuse at Westminster had found evidence of deference to the powerful, Stanage said. “Did the same culture of deference prevent the authorities in this case acting fairly in their investigations of Lord Janner?”
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/culture-of-deference-may-have-protected-lord-janner-abuse-inquiry-hears/ar-BB19YI49

  349. https://psychcentral.com/news/2020/06/05/common-mental-health-disorders-caused-by-adversity-not-chemistry/156839.html

    Emerging research suggests some of the most common mental disorders including depression, anxiety and PTSD, might not be disorders at all, rather a response to adversity.

    …….depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder may be primarily responses to adversity; therefore, only treating the “psychic pain” of these issues with drugs will not solve the underlying problem.

  352. I had concerns about this judge in 2016. My husband went to a journalist about Simon Oliver because of the way he treated our granddaughter. My granddaughter was placed into care with known pedophiles with ongoing investigations against them by the police and Simon Oliver is the one who did it. My husband contacted a journalist in March 2016 and this journalist started making enquiries. Within a couple of weeks, two police officers from Thames valley police came to our home address and barged right past me and went upstairs and assaulted my husband. They punched him several times in his stomach and got him into a choke hold. They said that he needs to retract his allegations against Simon Oliver otherwise they will come back and they will arrest him for harassment and assaulting police officers. Naturally we got the fear of our life in us and refused to correspond any further with the journalist in fear of our safety and our granddaughter’s. I now know that Simon Oliver has a very good relationship with Thames valley police and it’s senior officers and it was very likely that my husband, me, my daughter and granddaughter could have quite easily been prosecuted over trumped-up charges. Similar to how he is doing it in the High Court right now.
    I like to post this comment anonymously to prevent anything happening to me or my husband
    Thank you

  353. https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfJennyHigham/status/806973434953682944/photo/1

    Mr Benjamin Maurice Silverstones father is called Dr Anthony Charles Silverstone and he is a consultant in gynaecology. He worked at King Edward hospital in London as well as UCLH hospital. he has a medical degree from the University of Birmingham. He would be so ashamed of the likes that his son Benjamin is now representing albeit its against another doctor. Benjamin’s mother is called Beverley and Dr Silverstone most probably met her whilst she was spreading for him. I used to have respect for doctors until I found this out. Now I hate doctor’s and lawyers. Knowles and his wife and Nicklin and his wife have the same set up too

  354. Family courts: ‘We’re treated with contempt’

    By Sanchia Berg
    BBC News

    Many parents involved in family court hearings are having to participate by phone and some say they cannot follow what is happening, according to a survey. These hearings sometimes determine the future of their children, whether they are taken into care, which parent they live with. Since lockdown eased the Family Court has been holding remote or hybrid hearings, where only a handful of people are in court and the others join by phone or video link.

    This summer, Elizabeth, not her real name, took part in a family court hearing by phone. For years her ex-partner had argued their two sons should live with him – but their permanent home had always been with her. This time, to her shock, the judge decided the two boys should move.

    “I wasn’t able to speak to my barrister during the hearing,” she said. “My phone line was used up listening to the court.”

    She believes it would have been different if she had been able to appear in person, to stand in court before the judge.

    “A million per cent. A lot of communication is more than just hearing someone over the telephone – it’s visual, body language.”

    Remote hearings for family courts ‘horribly cruel’
    Lockdown family court delays ‘let down’ children

    We can’t see the evidence in family courts and no judgment has been published in Elizabeth’s case – so we don’t know why the judge made that decision, or whether appearing in person would have made a difference,

    But her account worries Sir Andrew MacFarlane, the most senior judge in the Family Court.

    “A major part of being a family judge is to empathise with the human beings at the centre of the case,” he says. “And it’s very difficult to do that even across a video link, very hard over a phone.”

    Since lockdown, the family courts have ensured social distancing by having few people in court and allowing others to join by virtual link. A survey published by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory suggests most professionals, including lawyers and judges, believe the system is working relatively smoothly.

    However, most of the parents who took part raised concerns. Most said they had had to participate via phone, like Elizabeth, and some said they couldn’t follow what was going on in the hearing.

    More than 1,100 professionals were contacted – 132 family members.

    Lisa Harker, director of the observatory, said parents reported being unable to fully participate in hearings, sometimes the technology broke down and at other times people had no support. She was worried about those who joined from home, and were left alone to absorb the court’s decision – which could be to take away their child forever.

    Prof Andy Bilson, who interviewed many of the parents, said one mother had to phone in to a hearing about her child from a psychiatric hospital. “The situation of doing hearings by telephone is not just,” he said.

    Sir Andrew believes the situation has been improving recently, and that for the most significant hearings parents are now able to appear before a judge. However he is concerned by some of the accounts logged by the observatory report, and says he will be working with the judiciary to find solutions.
    ‘Deprived of our rights’

    Meanwhile the workload of the family courts has been growing. Cafcass, the court service, reported record numbers of child cases in England for September. In that month, there were 5,761 new cases (12.6% or 644 cases more cases than September 2019).

    Most of these (4,262) were so-called private law, where parents cannot agree over their children, like Elizabeth’s dispute with her ex-partner.

    I asked Sir Andrew if he knew why these numbers were rising. He explained it was partly because of a backlog in the system, partly because existing child arrangements for visits and residence had broken down, but also because of a rise in the number of domestic abuse cases.

    “Sadly the number of domestic abuse cases has gone up, and there will be a necessary correlation in applications to protect children in those sad cases.”

    Elizabeth is trying to appeal against the judge’s decision, but for now has no money to pay lawyers. She believes the process has been deeply unfair. Over the summer, just before her hearing, there was a much publicised libel case, which saw actor Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard give evidence to the High Court after Depp took legal action against the Sun newspaper.

    “Johnny Depp can go to a court hearing in person, with Amber Heard, and be socially distanced, because they’re celebrities and have money. In the family courts we’re treated with contempt, deprived of our rights.”

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54700184

  357. Fw: Court of Protection list Sept 2015.
    Louisa Lloyd-Jones

    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice,

    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department

    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL

    | DX 123243 Westminster 12

    Email: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,

    In Pursuit of the Truth and Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    On the 23 April 2016 at the Children Screaming to be Heard Conference in London, former Detective Chief Inspector, Clive Driscoll, Metropolitan Police Service

    (most famous for securing convictions for the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence) made the following comment: “If you assert something it has to be evidence-based”

    In Pursuit of the Truth by DCI Clive Driscoll: ISBN 978-178503-006-2

    “If you assert something it has to be evidence-based”

    9 September 2010 Richard Anelay QC Head of Chambers at 1 King’s Bench Walk, and a judge of the High Court Family Division, wrote a letter advising me that barrister

    Dominic Brazil, 1 King’s Bench Walk Chambers, had informed Richard Anelay QC that I Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection when he

    barrister Dominic Brazil had placed Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in costs and adverse inferences upon me by not disclosing my protected status to the Court of

    Protection.

    I can now assert and evidence that HHJ Simon Oliver had sight of Richard Anelay’s QC letter prior to the hearing on the 16 April 2012 at Reading County Court. However,
    HHJ Simon Oliver proceeded to hear my case when, as can be seen from James Batey at the Court of Protection, HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection
    authorisation.

    Had HHJ Simon Oliver held a Court of Protection authorisation he may have observed that the five Court of Protection Medical Certificates that he held did not have the
    embossed seal of the Court of Protection on them! What is puzzling is why HHJ Simon Oliver did not send Richard Anelay’s QC letter to either the Court of Protection
    or the Civil Court of Appeal, saving the Legal Aid Agency tens of thousands of pounds in legal costs and HM Government hundreds of thousands of pounds in neurological
    rehabilitation costs for myself Leonard Lawrence, following my exposure to organophosphates and contaminated cabin air. These costs could have, and still can, be
    recovered from barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk. Barrister Dominic Brazil and 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers have parted company!

    Louisa,

    Picking on the little people

    Whilst your client HHJ Simon Oliver was entirely satisfied on the 30 August 2012 that as a former member of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces (Royal Navy) I was asset-stripped
    and evicted onto the streets, like thousands of other servicemen and women with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Many others diagnosed with PTSD like Corporal
    Jimmy Johnston have spent years in prison. In Corporal Jimmy Johnston’s case over 40 years. Indeed, I received a parcel from Corporal Jimmy Johnston, HM Prison Frankland,
    today on the very subject of PTSD. Professor Gordon Turnbull’s FRCP FRCPsych Court of Protection, Medical Certificate CP2 goes into detail about PTSD. However, your client
    HHJ Simon Oliver never forwarded Professor Gordon Turnbull’s FRCP FRCPsych Court of Protection, Medical Certificate CP2 to the Court of Protection or the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Louisa, you may wish to inform your client WBro HHJ Simon Oliver that we have recovered Richard Anelay’s QC letter dated 9 September 2010. How many Court of Protection
    hearings did HHJ Simon Oliver hear between 2011 and the 6 October 2015 without a Court of Protection authorisation remains unknown at this present time.

    Some of those (females) that had their cases heard by WBro HHJ Simon Oliver have found it necessary to leave the United Kingdon to safeguard their children. Those unable
    to leave the United Kingdom have lost their children and their homes. Other victims have been issued with Civil Restraint Orders and extended Civil Restraint Orders with
    threats of imprisonment and/or the seizure of all their assets if they dare to speak about their cases. In one such case involving WBr HHJ Simon Oliver the now deceased
    Sunday Telegraph journalist Christopher Brooker was silenced by the High Court from reporting on the case. The mother and her children had to leave the United Kingdom,
    they are still unable to return.

    Louisa, your client, to give him his full title, The Provincial Orator WBro HHJ Simon Oliver, Berkshire Freemasonry, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684. Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG41 5EA has still to explain why I was told by solicitor Paul Hicks, Simpson Millar LLP Solicitor to agree to pay £10,000 given
    that HHJ Simon Oliver was told by Mrs Justice Pauffley to re-transfer my case to the Civil Court of Appeal in February 2013 and why I was told by solicitor Paul Hicks that my
    Appeal had failed!

    Not all Freemasons behave like WBro HHJ Simon Oliver, including some associated with Thames Valley Police. I have a “GIFT” for WBro HHJ Simon Oliver from Thames Valley
    Police. Indeed, I have several GIFTS the existence of which had been denied by Thames Valley Police in 2015.

    Louisa, would you inquire with HHJ Simon Oliver’s barrister Ben Silverstone, Matrix Chambers, how The Honourable Mr Justice Julian Knowles, Approved Judgement
    Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 401 (QB) containing 125 paragraphs spanning 30 pages was posted on the Matrix Chambers website within hours of the hearing on the
    29 Nov 2019, and more than 10 days before the Approved Judgement was handed down by The Honourable Mr Justice Julian Knowles on the 10 December 2019.

    Finally, returning to former Detective Chief Inspector, Clive Driscoll, Metropolitan Police Service and Croydon’s infamous Shirley Oaks children’s home. The home, based in
    Croydon but run by Lambeth Council. When Clive Driscoll first began making inquiries, he was transferred from Lamberth to Fulham. Like the Shirley Oaks children’ those of
    us that have had the misfortune to have encountered WBro HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading County Court and at other courts are uniting and sharing our experiences, even court
    transcripts. I will be sharing a court transcript of a Court of Protection hearing on the 4 August 2005 at Slough County Court. The hearing lasted less than 10 minutes after which
    a £10,000 cost order was placed upon me by District Judge John Fortgang, but Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation. Those present at the hearing included
    a solicitor from Government Legal Services, barrister Dominic Brazil, barrister Nicholas Allen QC, solicitor Sarah Benfield and several others. So, there we are, these unlawful
    Court of Protection hearings have been occurring for over 15 years in the Thames Valley Police area.

    Kindest regards,

    Leonard Lawrence

    bcc

    Provincial Grand Master, Berkshire Freemasons, Anthony C. Howlett-Bolton OBE
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684. Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG41 5EA

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

    From: Batey, James
    Sent: 17 July 2012 11:59
    To: len lawrence
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.

    Kind regards

    James Batey

    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-460

    From: Chukwuma.. @judiciary.gsi.gov.uk>
    Sent: 31 March 2016 13:43
    To: ‘bae146@hotmail.co.uk’
    Subject: Freedom of Information Act response attached

    Dear Mr. Lawrence,

    Please find the response attached.

    Thanks

    Chukwuma

    | Judicial Appointments (Pre-Appointments) Advisor & Swearing-in Officer | Judicial Office for England & Wales | 10th Floor Thomas More Building | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand | WC2A 2LL |

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver was nominated to hear Court of Protection cases on 7 October 2015

    From: gov.uk
    To: Leonard Lawrence
    Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:07:25 +0000
    Subject: Court of Protection list.

    Dear Mr. Lawrence

    Please find attached a current list of Court of Protection ticketed judges.

    Kind regards

    Court of Protection
    PO Box 70185
    First Avenue House
    42-49 High Holborn
    LONDON
    WC1A 9JA

  358. I had a completely unrelated litigation taking place in the High Court and my solicitors firm told me that if you want a very favorable decision given to you by a justice of the queen’s bench division, then matrix chambers are the go-to lawyers to get that done. As long as you hire matrix chambers, you will get the decision that you want in the Courts. If you look at Simon Oliver’s litigation and how he has hired matrix chambers, this is an indication that the Ministry of Justice is fully aware of how matrix chambers uses its position to get favoured judgements in court. The Ministry of Justice requires an overhaul as it has failed for decades. They have failed deliberately. They know everything that is happening in the courts and how victims in society exist but they choose not to do anything about it. I remember when Barry George was sent to prison for Jill Dando’s murder when he never committed the murder in the first place. The government and the MoJ were more than happy for this to take place as long as the finger does not get pointed back at them. And this is now what Nicklin, M is doing. These people think that we, the public, are stupid and I guess we are to an extent until we realise what is really going on

  359. You’re right Sam, Matrix does have a reputation to get favoured judgements. Let’s look at how Benjamin Silverstone already had a copy of the judgement before it was handed down by the High Court. Matrix in fact, uploaded it on their website on the day of the actual hearing. Matrix chambers as a whole is in contempt. All of this progressed in media articles labelling the defendant as a terrorist too. The strange thing is that even after they got caught, they still carried on doing a committal application where another disturbed judgement was given. These people never learn

  361. Gentlemen:
    United Kingdom

    Below this email is JUST ONE piece of testimony on a matter that we are dealing with in the UK. We have documentary evidence on several dozen cases handled by Judge Simon Jonathan Oliver alone. Please feel free to share this information with your members and colleagues around the world.

    We know that certain corrupt members of the judiciary gag their victims and make incredibly over-the-top harsh threats against them, should they tell anyone – even their lawyer or member of parliament – about their case. In some cases, victims have been ordered that they must not even to speak to their family members.

    One very prominent serving high court judge that we can name threw a woman into prison SECRETLY, and without a legitimate court hearing. She had no witnesses or legal representation. Her ‘crime’ was that she was making too many enquiries through legitimate channels, such as the Law Society, about the theft of all of her millionaire mother’s assets, which theft was facilitated through the Court of Protection with forged documents, and which involved two prominent law firms, one of which is a household name with many international branches.

    The woman, a widow who was pregnant with two children at her feet, was literally thrown onto the street by bailiffs. The taxpayer has subsequently had to house these people because they become penniless and homeless and, in some cases, end up with stress-related physical and mental conditions. There are NUMEROUS cases like this.

    A representative of one of the legal firms in the woman’s case subsequently attempted to sue a member of parliament, John Hemming, from exercising his parliamentary privilege to speak about another case in parliament. It didn’t do much for his firm’s reputation, and showed their ignorance of the law.

    Many others are help work the crimes, which often involve false instruments and failure to comply with Civil Procedure Rules. Of course it is fraud on the court but seems to be an open secret that those in the highest positions in the land will not address.

    Thames Valley Police and Devon and Cornwall Police have been covering up and actually perjuring for this judge. We have that evidence too. Some of the corrupt senior police officers have moved on or retired. Some are members of Common Purpose. One was knighted by the Queen. One is in now in a VERY key position with a bigger and more prominent force, supposedly in charge of fraud and organized crime! That’s how they do it. They are often said to be assisted in their placements by Common Purpose.

    Your country’s police may well have had direct contact with this senior officer.

    The total of the alleged bribes that are demanded must surely be massive if the demands such as the one mentioned below are involved. Where does it go? Who is laundering it?

    Home of the Berkshire Freemasons https://www.sindleshamcourt.co.uk/

    Officers and Freemasons https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00953392/officers

    https://www.berkspgl.org.uk/lodges/l3545/
    This had been registered under Reading Old Boys at Companies House as a separate entity from the Berkshire Freemasons. Simon Oliver was a director when I last looked.

    One of the victims of Judge Simon Oliver has been threatened by senior Freemasons from the main lodge in London. Other Freemasons have resigned, allegedly in disgust over Simon Oliver, who is a senior member of the Berkshire Lodge.

    As you may know, a report published by the Metropolitan Police in 2002 disclosed that organized crime had not only infiltrated the police, but also the entire legal system, and it stated that many of the corrupt parties choose to meet each other in secret societies – especially the Freemasons.

    Working from the inside of the legal system, criminals with law and accounting degrees are the most dangerous kind of criminals with friends and associates in other countries and oversight bodies that actively either prevent investigation, or operate with extreme bias.

    We do know that children are stolen from parents through the family courts and sold on for adoption. I was once advised that this is a two billion pound industry, but am unable to comment personally on that. Many children are never heard of again. Before Brexit, Britain was the only country in Europe that allowed children to be forcibly removed from the natural parents and permanently adopted out.

    From many accounts on this website alone, the outcome of these secret court cases appear to depend on bribes. This judge has been sitting in courts that he is not authorised to sit in and blocking appeals.

    This woman’s testimony (below) fits the pattern of many other complaints against this judge. We know he is not the only one, and the Family Courts are not the only courts being used for crime – highly organized financial crime.

    British police are a waste of time and will do nothing.

    Measures need to be in place to stop crimes like this in every country and to stop cross border crime. There seem to be hands across the water everywhere. It’s easy to do with a court order or a fraudulent arrest warrant.

    Please try to find the time to study the comments on the website referenced below and do what you can to prevent similar activities in your country’s courts.

    People are adding their stories to this website on an almost daily basis, so it is worth watching. The corruption in the judiciary in the UK is deeply ingrained, as it appears to be in Austria.

    It is unfortunate that the judicial complaints system in the UK is said to be part of the problem. Like any and all oversight bodies in the UK, there is self-interest and corruption. People are now doing their own investigations and publicizing the results.

    AUSTRIA

    May I also draw your attention to a very unsavoury judicial practice in AUSTRIA. If Justice Elisabeth Lovrek is not aware of this practice, then I invite her to contact me for more details. If she is aware of this practice, then it is totally unacceptable in the western world and is reminiscent of Nazi Austria. It must stop.

    Perhaps recipients of this email would like to advise the Austrian judiciary about it please? No doubt you are unable to hold your Global Judicial Integrity Conference this year, due to the Corona Virus, but the matters that I describe to you now might be a very good subject for your next conference.

    In Austria, there is a court expert witness by the name of Professor Dr. Manfred Waltzl, a psychiatrist. The court pays him 116.20 Euros a piece to produce false instruments to lay before the court. On the strength of these false instruments, people are sentenced. The instruments are fraudulent psychiatric reports. According to the Austrian mainstream media, he produces 365 of these reports a year for the counts, at the bidding of the courts, AND NEVER EVER EXAMINES THE SUBJECT!

    Professor Dr. Manfred Walzl is head of faculty at Graz University, runs a sleep clinic, and also does work at the Sigmund Freud Klinikum in Graz. At the same time, he runs an artisan beer brewery and promotes the brew as a health drink.

    Obviously, the poor man does NOT examine the 365 p.a. subjects, because there is not enough time in the whole year!

    As a result of this FRAUD ON THE COURT, thousands of people have been unlawfully and fraudulently incarcerated in Austria. One such person is the PERFECTLY SANE historian, author, multi-linguist, and intellectual, Peter Hofschroer, who graduated from the prestigious King’s College, London.

    Mr. Hofschroer and his mother, Barbara, were the victims of serious organised crime, and criticised police for not protecting them. Then their troubles started. Barbara Hofschroer was kidnapped, and Peter Hofschroer was accused and convicted in the UK for crimes that he DID NOT commit.

    Before being extradited to Austria to face charges for crimes that he did not commit, he was examined by psychiatrist Dr. Elizabeth Gethins of Derbyshire, England upon orders of the English Courts, and found to be PERFECTLY SANE WITH NO PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS. The report was accepted without question by the courts, as she was their expert witness.

    The problems in this case are as follows:

    (1) Peter Hofschoer and his mother, Barbara, are victims of serious organized crime spanning the UK, Austria, and Germany. This involves the police and the judiciary in three countries, including Austria.

    (2) He was accused, in Austria, of crimes that (a) did not warrant extradition, and (b) did not warrant incarceration.

    (3) The Austrian Courts refuse to accept Dr. Gethins’ report because their sole intent is to keep him incarcerated, so that their assets can be stolen. They have been stolen now.

    (4) Dr. Martin Stefula, now in the Superior Court, condemned Peter Hofschroer, even before any psychiatric report was ordered. He sent him to the Sigmund Freud Klinikum immediately and denied him bail.

    (5) Two CONFLICTING AND CONTRADICTORY psychiatric reports were produced AFTER Judge Stefula’s order by Dr. Walzl, and at the command of Dr. Stefula. Peter Hofschroer has never ever been examined by Dr. Walzl or any other Austrian psychiatrist, and this whole case is null and void as a result. These reports were challenged in court, but the judge had no intention of releasing Peter Hofschoer so it was a waste of time and money to even attend an Austrian court.

    (6) These facts have all been pointed out to the judiciary, the Ministry of Justice, the President of Austria, and EVERY SINGLE government body that should be concerned about this very common, totally corrupt oppressive practice that has even been exposed by Austria’s mainstream media. The Austrian State is not the slightest big embarrassed by the disclosure of the corruption.

    (7) There has been no response from any of these people, and it is apparent that AUSTRIA does not meet international standards of fairness and justice, and needs to be brought to task for human rights violations and the denial of Mr. Hofschroer’s rights under Article 6 of the ECHR.

    (8) Mr. Hofschroer was held at the Sigmund Freud Klinikum until from July 2017 until January 2019, whereupon he was transferred to the notorious Asten Prison for the criminally insane. He is still there. Someone at the clinic stole 900 Euros from his personal account. Nobody in Austria cares.

    (9) His right to confidential correspondence between himself and any legal counsel has been ignored. I am advised that Austria does not feel that prisoners have the right to correspond with legal representatives in private, and that the prison has the right to read all correspondence between himself and legal counsel. This again does not meet international standards of fairness and justice. His legitimate legal mail is continually interfered with by the prison, intercepted, sabotaged, sent to the Prosecutor (or somewhere unknown), and legal documents have been removed from envelopes, never to be received by Peter, so that they cannot be presented in court as evidence in his defence. Mail sent to others by Peter is also interfered with and never reaches is destination. Again, items are removed from the envelopes.

    (10) The worrying thing is that the Austrian government, legal system, and judiciary seem to feel that this is perfectly alright, legal, and acceptable, whereas it really means that he has no equality of arms, is not receiving justice, and it violates his rights under Article 6 of the ECHR.

    (11) His complaints about physical and psychological abuse, and lack of medical and dental treatment while being unlawfully incarcerated are laughed at. People in Asten prison ‘fall down stairs’, and commit suicide in what appears to be a fairly regular occurence. One female inmate was found dead in January. It did not reach the newspapers.

    (12) He has now been advised that he is to be DETAINED FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE. All of this is as a result of a recent FRAUDULENT psychiatric report submitted to the courts by another lying psychiatrist WHO HAS NEVER EXAMINED HIM. Not one psychiatrist in Austria has ever examined him and, please be clear that he is now being detained for the rest of his life.

    I am sorry to say that this reminds me very much of the Nazi occupation of Austria.

    I am requesting intervention, please, from UNODC’s Global Judicial Integrity Network, as it appears that the international community need to hold the Austrian judiciary to account. This case has been mentioned in British parliament on a number of occasions, and the public will not stand for this unlawfulness.

    Peter Hofschroer needs to be released immediately. I am informing also the UN and other parties, but it needs Austria to be proactive and step up to the plate on this. He should be released as soon as this virus situation is over.

    The case has been well published on the internet, and I will gladly enter into a discussion or provide more information to anyone who cares enough about true justice, stamping out judicial corruption, and bringing both Austria and the UK in line with ethical judicial principals, and addressing out the widespread corruption that is apparent in both countries.

    Please read on below re the continuation of the story of judicial corruption in the UK.

    This information is offered to you with honesty and integrity and is, to the best of my knowledge, completely true. It is given in good faith, without bias, and in the Public Interest.

  362. “Raised eyebrows at the Home Office after its Permanent Secretary Matthew Rycroft marked Black History Month by announcing his new role as the Civil Service Race Champion, replacing Sir Richard Heaton.

    As my mole put it bluntly, it was one white man replacing another.

    Of course this allows Whitehall to continue what it does best – spend taxpayer money on consultants’ lessons on diversity.” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8900837/ANNA-MIKHAILOVA-Andrea-Leadsom-shamed-MPs-clawback-transparency.html

    BLACK OR WHITE: I don’t think the Ministry of Justice recognises anything written in black and white. To them, everything should be made grey so that they can continue NOT to uphold the Rule of Law. Never more shifty wide boys and girls than in the Ministry of Justice and Home Office.

  363. FTAO:
    The Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry
    Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road,
    Sindlesham
    Wokingham,
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

    Dear WBro Simon

    A a quote by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. who said:

    “Each time a person stands up for an idea, or acts to improve the lot of others,
    or strikes out against injustice, she/he is sending out a ripple of hope, and
    crossing each other from a million different centres of energy and daring,
    those ripples build a current that can sweep down the migh’est walls of
    oppression and resistance.”

    Leonard Lawrence.

  364. To all the crooks operating under the auspices of the British sovereign: Thanks to you, even the monarchy itself is crumbling. We are the 99% and we know exactly how your criminal cabal operates. Even your peers around the world are disgusted with you. Please be assured that they are reading everything on this website – names and all – and taking note of the evil that has infiltrated the British so-called justice system. You have made justice a complete laughing stock.

  365. Louisa Lloyd-Jones
    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team
    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department
    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL
    | DX 123243 Westminster 12

    Email: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,

    Cyclops: Court of Protection specimen certificate.

    Three groups of Cyclopes can be distinguished: the Hesiodic, the Homeric and the wall-builders.
    Cyclopes are the three brothers: Brontes, Steropes, and Arges, sons of Uranus and Gaia, who made
    for Zeus characteristic weapon, the thunderbolt.

    Louisa, let me deliever the first thunderbolt.

    Thames Valley Police
    On the 16 August 2019 Thames Valley Police disclosed that they had known since 2004 that I
    had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection, having been poisened by organophosphates
    from my former occupation as a commerical pilot.

    Also, that since 2004 BP Collins Solicitors had not disclosed to any court the Court of Protection,
    Medical Certificate, they have held since November 2004 that was issued to protect me.

    The Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry, Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver had known
    of the above since April 2012 but never informed the Court of Protection or the Civil Court of Appeal.

    There is a lot of other facts that my Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver has not disclose.

    Kindest Regards

    Leonard Lawrence

    Hi Len
    Three groups of Cyclopes can be distinguished: the Hesiodic, the Homeric and the wall-builders
    Cyclopes are the three brothers: Brontes, Steropes, and Arges, sons of Uranus and Gaia, who made
    for Zeus characteristic weapon, the thunderbolt.

  366. Raised eyebrows at the Home Office after its Permanent Secretary Matthew Rycroft marked Black History Month by announcing his new role as the Civil Service Race Champion, replacing Sir Richard Heaton.

    As my mole put it bluntly, it was one white man replacing another.

    Of course this allows Whitehall to continue what it does best – spend taxpayer money on consultants’ lessons on diversity.” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8900837/ANNA-MIKHAILOVA-Andrea-Leadsom-shamed-MPs-clawback-transparency.html

    BLACK OR WHITE: I don’t think the Ministry of Justice recognises anything written in black and white. To them, everything should be made grey so that they can continue NOT to uphold the Rule of Law. Never more shifty wide boys and girls than in the Ministry of Justice and Home Office.

  367. Well well well, look what we have here. I would like to tell everyone a little story about our lovely justice in the high court Matthew Nicklin QC. Does everyone know that he has a real estate company and care home companies which he runs with his wife and Sharon Elizabeth Nicklin? I bet you didn’t. The care home industry generates billions and it would be highly unlikely that Simon Oliver and Matthew Nicklin do not know each other, keeping in mind that Simon Oliver has given a lot of business to care homes, one of them possibly being Matthew Nicklins. The care home company is called Muscat homes ltd and only last year made £700,000. I can now see you why Matthew Nicklin gives such stiff penalties for someone like Simon Olivers benefit because it’s actually personally ruining his own business having Simon Oliver being named and shamed.

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10014197/officers

  368. 6 November 20020

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones
    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice, Costs and Inquests Team
    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department
    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL
    | DX 123243 Westminster 12

    Email: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,
    It has been brought to my attention that in one of your letters you identify that
    Government Legal Services were instructed by the Ministry of Justice to represent
    Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver’s in his civil action action against
    Mr. Javed Sheikh.

    Louisa, do you know the name of who within the Ministry of Justice instructed Government
    Legal Services to act on behalf of Simon Oliver?

    Secondly, do you know who within the Ministry of Justice authorised the financing of the
    proceedings for HHJ Simon Oliver’s against Mr. Javed Sheikh? There must be a paper trail.

    With legal costs, I understand, now approaching £100,000 authorisation, I believe, came
    from a senior person within the Ministry of Justice, possibly the now-former Permanent
    Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Mr Richard Heaton.

    In the meantime I wait for the WBro His Honour Judge Simon Oliver to comply with the
    directions of Mrs Justice Pauffley and re-transfer my case to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Louisa,

    Kindest regards

    Leonard Lawrence

  369. Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations, City of London Police

    [Gavin is the United Kingdom’ economic crime representative to the European Union and has
    influenced recent policy amendments].

    FEBRUARY 2016
    THE THEN DETECTIVE INSPECTOR GAVIN TYRRELL, THAMES VALLEY POLICE, WROTE TO
    ADVISE ME THAT AN INTERNAL POLICE REVIEW FOUND NO COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE
    IN MY CASE. THAT IS NOW KNOWN TO BE UNTRUE. THERE WAS EVIDENCE, SEE BELOW.

    19 August 2019 Thames Valley Police disclosed the following about myself, Leonard Lawrence.

    Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564 Reading CID. Summary of Issues February 2016

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife,
    they apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven misdiagnosis that he is bipolar
    and hypermanic. BP Collins (Solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is
    subject to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the care of the Court of Protection”.

    Below is the solicitor that obtained the Part V11 Medical certificate and his instructed barrister:

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser,
    OGR Stock Denton LLP Winston House, 2 Dollis Park, London N3 1HF

    Barrister Dominic Brazil,
    Stephens Rd Chambers 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

    Yours
    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————
    ps
    I am not the only Slough/Reading court victim to be silenced under the Mental Health Act 1983

    The case below involved three High Court Family Judges, and the Sunday Telegraph journalist
    Christopher Brooker, who was silenced by the High Court Family Division, along with others.

    MATTHEWS v MATTHEWS

    The mother and children had to flee the United Kingdom with the loss of their home. They
    are still unable to return.

    Who was the judge that triggered this? Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    The Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry
    Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre
    Mole Road,
    Sindlesham
    Wokingham,
    Berkshire
    RG41 5EA

  370. Oliver will only accept gifts Len if you put it in a box and give it to him. Why not ask Kevin brooks from the government legal department to do it for you? He seems like an expert. Maybe Louisa Lloyd-Jones might be a candidate.

  371. Does justice Matthew Nicklin QC’s care homes have open invites for Richard Heaton so he can abuse young boys in?

  372. Judge Peter Greenwood (Chelmsford)

    Len,
    He was strict Len but also hard as nails with Barristers, Police and stood no
    nonsense from anybody.

    A really nice genuine man, sadly one who did keep to the law, on both the
    Prosecution and Defendants.

    Just wish there were more like him. If Simon Oliver was in his area, he would
    have been behind the dock not in front of it.

    All the best

  373. Ian Dyson.
    Commissioner of the City of London Police
    City Of London Police Headquarters
    37 Wood St
    EC2P 2NQ
    London

    Dear Commissioner Dyson,

    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell – City of London Police.
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations, City of London Police.

    Detective Superintendent, Gavin Tyrrell, City of London Police, was in February 2016
    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Thames Valley Police.

    In a letter dated Febuary 2016 Gavin Tyrrell failed to disclose to me Detective Inspector
    Nicholas Watts, DI 4564 findings. See below:

    Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564
    Reading, Berkshire, Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Thames Valley Police.

    Summary of Issues February 2016

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (BP Collins Solicitors)
    acting for his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven
    misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hypermanic.

    BP Collins (Solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr. Lawrence is subject
    to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the care of the Court of Protection”.

    Commissioner Dyson,
    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell has been very informative about myself and what
    was occuring within Thames Valley Police at the time Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564
    wrote his Summary of Issues in February 2016. This information has now been forwarded
    to me by a police force. Bullying by senior officers !! These officers can be indentified.

    Commissioner Dyson,
    Ian Younger Deputy Director – Professional Standards Directorate, City of London Police.
    Following my telephone call to Ian Younger, Deputy Director – Professional Standards
    all of the files held on my case disappeared from City of London Police, including those
    that had identified offences of fraud, perjury and other more serious offences, including
    this recorded statement GA490 16:58 3 February 2015 City of London Police.

    By blocking email communications from myself and other victims of financial abuse, Ian
    Younger, City of London Police, is of the mistaken belief that he can neutralise the number
    of police complaints and investigations.

    NEVER GOING TO STOP THE GOOD COPS, INCLUDING MASONIC COPS, FROM WHISLEBLOWING.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leonard Lawrence

    ———————————————————————-

    Those below held, but failed to disclose to the Court of Protection , the Part V11 MHA 1983
    Medical Certificate identefied in Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564 Summary of Issues,
    dated February 2016:

    Solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law.
    BP Collins Solicitors, 20 Station Rd, Gerrards Cross SL9 8EL, United Kingdom

    Solicitor Graeme S. Fraser,
    Previously with BP Collins Solicitors
    Now at: OGR Stock Denton LLP, Winston House, 2 Dollis Park, London N3 1HF

    Barrister Dominic Brazil,
    Previously with 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, London
    Now at: Stephens Rd Chambers, 84 Stephens Rd, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, Kent TN4 9QA

  374. 11 November 2020

    Ian Dyson.
    Commissioner of the City of London Police
    City Of London Police Headquarters
    37 Wood St
    EC2P 2NQ
    London

    Dear Commissioner Dyson,

    EVIDENCE BASED POLICING

    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell – City of London Police.
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations, City of London Police.

    Commissioner Dyson,

    As advised on an earlier posting on this website HHJ Simon Oliver, judges behaving badly,
    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrrell has been very informative about myself and what
    was occuring within Thames Valley Police at the time Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564
    wrote his Summary of Issues in February 2016.

    The police files released to me by the IPCC/IOPC and by another police force identify that
    in 2016 when the then Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell was the Head of Economic Crime
    Unit, Thames Valley Police, Gavin Tyrrell was recieving instructions not from his Detective
    Chief Inspector, but directly from his Detective Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton,
    Head of Covert Policing and Specialist Operations at Thames Valley Police.

    Detective Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton and I have history back dating to 2004,
    when Gillian Vannesa Wootton was a Detective Inspector based at Amersham, that Gillian
    Vannesa Wootton will not wish to be reminded of regarding stolen documents.

    Gillian Vannesa Wotton had know in 2004 the location of all of my stolen documents but
    elected not to disclose this information and I ended up with over Fifty Thousand Pounds
    of legal costs placed on me by BP Collins Solicitors, Gerrards Cross, Bucks.

    A specific request by the former Attorney General, and the Chair of the Intelligence and
    Security Committee Dominic Grieve QC PC for the police to investigate the theft of my
    documents was neutralised. Derogatory comments were even entered onto the Thames
    Valley Police computer at that time by Insp Mark Stevens. I have a printout.

    In February 2016 when Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564 Thames Valley Police wrote the
    ‘Summary of Issues’ below, this was going to be problematical for the now Detective
    Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton, as Gillian Vannesa Wootton had known in 2004
    that solicitor Graeme S. Fraser and BP Collins Solicitors had disclosed some of my stolen
    documents. Solicitor Susan Andrews, Head of Family Law, BP Collins Solicitors has already
    admitted to being in recept of my stolen documents.
    ———————————————————————–
    Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564
    Reading, Berkshire, Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Thames Valley Police.

    Summary of Issues February 2016

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (BP Collins Solicitors)
    acting for his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him upon a later proven
    misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hypermanic.

    BP Collins (Solicitors) then fail to notify the County Court that Mr. Lawrence is subject
    to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the care of the Court of Protection”.
    ———————————————————————-
    Commissioner Dyson,

    Special proceedures were put into place to deal with my case, to stop Thames Valley Police
    officers investigating. All matters were to go directly to Professional Standards. Who was
    the Head of Profession Standards, Thames Vally Police, in Febuary 2016 ?

    Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer
    or
    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine

    The answer is below Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer.

    Claire Mxxxx – Public Access Officer
    Joint Information Management Unit | Thames Valley Police and Hampshire Constabulary
    External: +44 (0)1865 542051 | Internal: 300-6773
    Address: Thames Valley Police Headquarters, Oxford Road, Kidlington, OX5 2NX

    Dear Mr Lawrence
    I write in response to the above-referenced Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request
    submitted on 3 June 2020. Thames Valley Police has now considered this request, which
    for clarity, has been repeated below:

    Request: Could you please advise me of the date Detective Chief Superintendent
    (now Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer) ceased in that position as Head of Thames
    Valley Police Professional Standards Department?

    Response 7 December 2017

    ————————————————————————-
    Detective Chief Superintendent Tim De Meyer (now Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer)
    reported to
    Deputy Chief Constable John Campbell (now Chief Constable John Campbell)
    reported to
    Chief Constable Francis Habgood. (Now departed from Thames Valley Police)
    ————————————————————————-

    Commissioner Dyson, who was protecting Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton ?

    Tim De Meyer ?
    John Campbell ?
    Francis Habgood ?

    The disclosure of Detective Inspector Watts, DI 4564 Reading CID ‘Summary of Issue’
    dated February 2016 coincided with the departure of Superintendent Gillian Vannesa
    Wootton from Thames Valley Police and the slightly earlier retirment of Chief Constable
    Francis Habgood.

    Both the now former Detective Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton and the now
    former Chief Constable Francis Habgood have a COMMON LINK.
    —————————————————————————
    Detective Chief Superintendent Colin Paine,
    Head of Professional Standards Department.

    I understand that you are also the national lead on abuse of position by police officers and the
    regional chair of the counter corruption working group.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Paine,
    One of the documents stolen from my home belonged to the first Customs and Excise Investigator
    to be based at New Scotland Yard at the time of Operation Countryman (The investigation into
    police corruption in London in the late 1970s), others documents I am not permitted to identify.

    However, two Circuit Judges and one other judge spent over 25 hours to identify the culprit.
    What a waste of court time when Detective Superintendent Gillian Vannesa Wootton had know
    the identity of the culprit since 2004.
    ————————————————————————–
    Commissioner Dyson.

    Ref: Ian Younger Deputy Director – Professional Standards Directorate, City of London Police.

    Had Ian Younger not blocked emails communications from myself and other victims of
    financial abuse, together with telephone calls there would have been no need to use this
    website.

    NEVER GOING TO STOP THE GOOD COPS, INCLUDING MASONIC COPS, FROM WHISLEBLOWING.

    Yours respectfully,

    Leonard Lawrence

  375. To Leonard,
    Leonard Lawrence (they may have taken literally everything from you but they couldn’t
    take your voice, will or courage to keep fighting…. your in my prayers) and the many many
    more who know personally Aerotoxic Poisoning.

    I’m grateful to have had your care, support, and understanding through what was a difficult
    part of my life. You are all amazingly courageous. I hope you all find peace and live abundantly
    in spite of this Aerotoxic experience

  376. Dear T…

    I see that HHJ Simon Oliver, judges behaving badly, website has reached Amerian Airlines,
    United Airlines and others airlines in the United States of America.

    Many lives could possibly have been saved had the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry,
    Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road, Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire,RG41 5EA
    complied with the instructions of Mrs Justice Pauffley in February 2913 and re-transferred my
    case to the Civil Court of Appeal as he was told to do.

    I am informed that The Duke of Kent who has been the Grand Master of the United Grand
    Lodge of England for over 50 years is concerened what is occuring within Freemasonary.

    In the past Worshipful Brother, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver would have been invited to
    leave the craft. Instead Berkshire Freemasonary have promoted my Worshipful Brother to
    the post of Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry.
    ——————————————————————
    AS YOU WILL READ BELOW NOT ALL BERKSHIRE FREEMASONS LIKE HHJ SIMON OLIVER

    A Freemasons view of WBro HHJ Simon Oliver:

    Dear Len,

    “My experience there has been very positive and uplifting and on the whole everyone I meet
    at Lodge Meetings are delightfully pleasant and good decent people. However I have heard
    of evil Freemasons……the one that springs to mind immediately is Kenneth Noye…..the M25
    murderer”.

    ” Simon Oliver is obviously a vile deceptive greedy individual and I am horrified to learn more
    and more bad things about him. What he did to you is immoral and unethical and it offends
    every sense of decency within me”.

    “If his Lodge are aware of his underhand dealings (They are) they will likewise be shocked
    and truly saddened by his dreadful behaviour”.

    “My loyalty is to you in this instance and I want to be completely honest and transparent with
    you. I care about you being safe and feeling safe and fighting for the justice that you so richly
    deserve. I am shocked by the response (or lack of response) that you have had from Dr David
    Staples. I would have expected far more support and engagement from him”.

    “If the rot in freemasonry runs this deep then I would consider resigning from my Lodge”.

    All the best to you Len
    ———————————————————————-

    It is the Executive of Berkshire Freemasonary, Berkshire Masonic Centre, Mole Road,
    Sindlesham, Wokingham, Berkshire,RG41 5EA who also are responsible for taking literally
    everything from me, including my Neurological Support dog. Registered with a Brain
    Injury Identity Card that is endoorsed by the National Police Chiefs Council, those below
    should be able to explain why all the funding for my Disabilty Support Dog was removed.
    If not, I suggest that they ask the former Provincial Grand Secretary David Keys.

    Provincial Grand Master ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Deputy Provincial Grand Master PETER SANDS
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master ROBIN KENT
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master MATTHEW WALKER
    Provincial Senior Grand Warden PAUL WILDING
    Provincial Junior Grand Warden LES MATTHEWS
    Provincial Grand Secretary LAURENCE FRETWELL
    Provincial Grand Director of Ceremonies JIM SAMPINS
    Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver

    Well T..
    Your correct, they couldn’t take my voice, will or courage to keep fighting….
    thank you for your prayers

    Kindest Regards

    Leonard Lawrence

  377. Today on the ITV news, I was watching child sex trafficking and trafficking of vulnerable adults from Eastern Europe to the UK. It reminded me of Simon Oliver and how he traffic’s children and the elderly into care homes which have been been built by judge Matthew Nicklin QC. Right under the nose of the ministry of justice. In fact, supported and protected by them. Just wondering whether the ministry of justice has used taxpayers money to finance the building of these care homes?

  378. Dear Barry, it’s horrific to know that a Berkshire freemason is involved in child sex trafficking. These disgusting Freemasons have allowed this sick pervert to carry on committing his disgusting crimes against civilisation. Even until today he still is in that lodge protected by senior Freemasons. They claim to be a charity organisation that make good men into better men. Nah, I don’t think so mate. It sounds like a load of bollocks. Simon Oliver is in the lodge because there is a criminal reason behind it. We should all take to social media and name and shame the Berkshire Freemasons because it’s a shameful organisation who are bringing harm to vulnerable adults and children.

    Put them all in the dock

  380. Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire Freemasonary
    ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road, Sindlesham,
    Berkshire RG41 5EA

    Dear W.M. Anthony

    Re: Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver, Berkshire Master Lodge No. 3684

    Freemasons should be exemplary in the discharge of their civil duties; this duty extends
    throughout each Mason’s private, public, business or professional life.

    Like so many other veterans of HM Armed Forces I am again homeless, responsibility
    resting with the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry the Worshipful Brother
    HHJ Simon Oliver and one or more members of Berkshire Master Lodge No. 3684

    I still wonder whether had I been able to pay the £10,000 that I was told to pay (THE GIFT)
    following the hearing before Worshipful Master Simon Oliver on the 16 April 2012
    whether my case would have been transferred to the Court of Appeal sooner. It is almost
    eight years now.

    Reflect at the nine o’clock toast (absent friends) and what some members of Berkshire
    Freemasonary have done to me and others.

    Leonard Lawrence

    FTAO
    Provincial Grand Master ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Deputy Provincial Grand Master PETER SANDS
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master ROBIN KENT
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master MATTHEW WALKER
    Provincial Senior Grand Warden PAUL WILDING
    Provincial Junior Grand Warden LES MATTHEWS
    Provincial Grand Secretary LAURENCE FRETWELL
    Provincial Grand Director of Ceremonies JIM SAMPINS
    Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver

  381. Dear Len
    I have a read the judgement of justice unhonourable Matthew Nicklin against ‘the doctor’. The case laws that he refers to in his entirety of his judgement are all family case laws or family judges who have written those judgements. Specifically, one example includes justice Cobb who is a family judge. Why would a media and communications judge such as Nicklin write a judgement which includes case laws only relevant to family cases? I smell a rat. It could be Simon Oliver forging documents again. We know he does that as well as stealing passports.

  383. Is that Benjamin Silverstone an actor? Probably get figures that he should get the nomination for best corrupt actor. He might get the award two weeks before it is awarded!

  384. Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire Freemasonary
    ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road, Sindlesham,
    Berkshire RG41 5EA

    Another child taken by the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver
    and placed into a care home. Like Sarah, Jean, David, Baylee. We must also not forget the
    mothers that have had to leave the United Kingdon with their children, and dare not come
    back!!

    The Matthews v Matthews that involved three High Court Judges and the Provincial Orator
    of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver. Very very simarler patten to, my own case
    Lawrence v Lawrence.

    Had the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver been a member of my
    former Masonic Lodge, that included former members of the Obsence Publication Squad
    (The Diry Squad), Metropolitian Police Service, the Provinical Orator would have been
    invited to leave!

    Leonard Lawrence

    Read below:
    ———————————————————————
    Reverse The Section 20 and Allow ‘I’ Home.

    “We approached our local authority for help, we believed they would support our son.
    We were so wrong'”.

    My name is xxx xxxxxxxx, I am autistic myself and am CEO of Autistic Inclusive Meets,
    when this family approached our organisation for help, and we heard of the great injustice
    they and their son have suffered we knew we had to act.

    We will call their son ‘I’.

    When Muselin Kasumu and his wife Nkechi approached their local authority in September
    2018 for a residential school placement for their non verbal autistic son they were rightly
    told in order to access this, they would have to sign a section 20.

    A section 20 gives the local authority joint parental rights and also gives them responsibilty
    for a child’s care.

    Their son then aged 15 was placed into the Macintyre School in Buckinghamshire where
    the couple were assured ‘I’ would receive life skills training, help with regulation and
    communication.

    Instead he suffered physical abuse, was subjected to PBS compliance training and had
    violent meltdowns.

    When I’s parents visited him they saw a bloodstain smeared across his wall, his window
    pane was broken and his bedding was encrusted with faeces. ‘I’s clothes were ripped in
    places he couldn’t have physically reached himself and heavily soiled.

    A false allegation was then made against the father in the Family Court, after the social
    services alledged that he had threatened to assault his son. A Care Order was then put in
    place to stop Muselin seeing ‘I’ completley. Muselin and Nketchi strongly deny this
    allegation, Muselin represented himself in court and was not given any support or legal
    advice.

    Muselin reported Macintyre to the Care Quality Commission in early 2019 for neglect.
    The school was then shut down for some time and in April, ‘I’ and other pupils were
    returned to their homes.

    The couple told the local authority that they wanted ‘I’ to stay home with them
    permanently, and requested the section 20 be reversed. They were told this was
    not possible.

    On October 2nd social workers came with the police to remove ‘I’ from his home.
    The couple refused to open the door, so they returned later that afternoon with an
    order from the court and forcibly removed ‘I’ and took him to Pengwern College
    in Wales, some 500 miles away from the family home.

    That was the last time Muselin saw his son.

    When ‘I’ first started residential he required 1.1 care, he now requires 4.1 due to
    his challenged behaviour.

    Muselin used to take ‘I’ for a long walk each day to help him regulate, ‘I’ loved
    to be out and enjoyed his daily routine.

    At Pengwern they have stated they will not be taking him out as its to much of a risk.
    The couple have also been sent photos of ‘I’ with injuries to his hands and feet, with
    no explanation as to how the injuries have been sustained.

    The couple have also said that their son was often kept in solitary confinement and
    has been put on strong medication to keep him compliant.

    ‘I’ has been repeatedly failed and abused instead of supported and educated.

    They have now been told that ‘I’ has been moved to an unknown location due to
    Muselin attempting to see his ‘I’ on his birthday.

    Neither Nketchi or Muselin know where there son is now currently residing.

    “We miss our son so much, we just want him home, ” sighed Nketchi “We never
    ever would have signed or even sought help had we known this would happen.
    His room is ready for him, he has a home, his things are here. Please allow him
    to come back to us”,

    We at Autistic Inclusive Meets ask that the section 20 and Care Order be reversed,
    and cancelled. We ask that ‘I’ be returned to the family home immediatley.

    —————————————————————
    Reflect at the nine o’clock toast (absent friends) and what some members of Berkshire
    Freemasonary have done to myself and many others by failing to investigate my Worshipful
    Brother.

    FTAO
    Provincial Grand Master ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Deputy Provincial Grand Master PETER SANDS
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master ROBIN KENT
    Assistant Provincial Grand Master MATTHEW WALKER
    Provincial Senior Grand Warden PAUL WILDING
    Provincial Junior Grand Warden LES MATTHEWS
    Provincial Grand Secretary LAURENCE FRETWELL
    Provincial Grand Director of Ceremonies JIM SAMPINS
    Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver

  385. Provincial Grand Master of Berkshire Freemasonary
    ANTHONY HOWLETT-BOLTON OBE
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road, Sindlesham,
    Berkshire RG41 5EA

    Dear Provincial Grand Master

    Victims of the Provincial Orator of Berkshire Freemasonry HHJ Simon Oliver are afraid
    to publish. Some have Civil Restrait Orders with threats of arrest, imprisonment and
    the seizure of all their assets if they disclose what has occured to them.

    Others like myself have found themsevles the subject of investigations by the police and
    other agencies.

    How many Court of Protection cases has HHJ Simon Oliver heard when he was not
    authorised to hear such cases remains uknown at this present time.

    Leonard Lawrence

    PLEASE SEE BELOW
    ———————————-

    It is impossible for me to load the website any longer, it crashes my browser and
    I can’t add any reply.

    “a residential school placement for their non verbal autistic son they were rightly
    told in order to access this, they would have to sign a section 20”

    WRONGLY told they would have to sign a section 20

    S20’s are frequently misused by ss falsely as a holding position and precursor to care and
    they have been heavily criticized publicly by Munby and others for doing so yet continue
    to abuse families in this way. A S20 is solely to place your child in state care under the
    guise of having a choice or retaining parental responsibility.

    A residential school placement is accommodated under an EHC plan (formerly a statement
    of special needs). SS do not need a S20 to fund the placement which is split between
    SS Education and NHS trusts.

    It might be an idea to inform the Childrens Commissioner, police , educational and medical
    authorities of this abuse of this child.

    Please inform this person so that this mistake is not repeated for other children who may
    come to the organization for help.

  386. I heard the portly bastard is back at Central family court still doing his child abductions under the premise of justice. There’s nothing this man does which involve justice unless you give him a gift. ‘I’ was abused because this is what goes on in care homes. They create future troubled adults. If you look at the porn industry, you will notice that nearly all of them have been in care homes or foster care homes and have also been abused in them for extended periods. High court judges are developing care homes for this purpose regularly. Let’s look at the company called muscat homes ltd.

  387. Care homes have not been created for caring but it’s been created by the establishment to encourage abuse of children and vulnerable adults. Jimmy savile was a regular visitor of care homes. Covered up from the ground up for as well. This is where paedophiles look. Let’s look at Simon Oliver and his infatuation with children. This man will do anything. He will lie and set you up so that he can abduct your children using the judicial process. No point in appealing because he has friends in the high court as well as the court you appeal who are throwing appeals out. Nicklin and Bancroft rimmer are prime examples

  391. If you have any factual evidence that supports alleged paedophilia then please produce it.

    I have so far found no evidence to support any allegations of paedophile activatives.

    What can be evidenced is the abuse of mental health legislation and the threats and malipulation
    of the judical process to silence victims of abuse.

    Both the Ministry of Justice and Thames Valley Police have known for some considerable time
    that HHJ Simon Oliver was acting outside of his juristiction by hearing Court of Protection cases
    prior to October 2015.

    There is evidence available to show that within the Thames Valley Police area, Court of Protection
    hearings have been heard by multiple judges that did not hold Court of Protection authorisation.
    This has occured as early as 2004.

    In 2005 the Crown Prosecution Service requested Thames Valley Police to visit me. Had they done
    so they would have found five Court of Protection, Medical Certificates that solicitors and barristers
    had knowingly failed to disclose to any authorised Court of Protection judge.

    Leonard Lawrence

  394. I am creating this Go Fund me page for my close friend who needs the financial support in instructing a barrister for any future hearings to get her babies back. The story behind it follows…

    ******Background******

    S is a qualified teacher and mother to three beautiful children, aged 17, 11 and 5. On the 3rd July 2020, when dropping the children home, an argument took place with their father, following which he decided to keep the two younger children. S was unaware he could do this, however the law states that as the person named on the birth certificate the father has just as much rights as the mother.

    After many unanswered calls and emails over a two-week period asking for them to be returned, S became concerned about their welfare and called the Police, believing they were her only hope. However, the police could only remove the children from him if they were in imminent danger.

    S has had several court hearings to try and get the children returned. This has been unsuccessful to date, due to legal costs which has meant S has had to represent herself.

    During the proceedings S has realised how many flaws there are in the system. From Children’s services to the children’s school, from Judges to barristers, from Cafcass to the Police, there are so many flaws! Failing to make relevant checks, omitting relevant information in documents and disclosing incorrect out of context information, are only but a few of these.

    Those that know S will know just how much she loves her children and would do anything for them. She isn’t perfect, but neither are you or I. You read about these stories on the internet all of the time and question why the system has gone against either parent, that there must be a valid reason. In this case and many others, it appears that money and power rule.

    What transpires here is the parent with the most money will win the battle despite the evidence presented against them. With cases between parents lasting upwards of two years, if you don’t have the money to go through the process, the chances are you’ve already lost. It doesn’t matter that your 5 year old now has separation anxiety and tells any and every one that she wants to live with her mummy, it doesn’t matter that the father has not followed the court order in relation to the children, it doesn’t even matter that your 11 year old son has been manipulated so badly, he has been coaxed into believing that what his father says is true.

    S continues to fight this battle, a battle which means her daughter has had limited access to her mummy and her son has not seen anyone from the maternal family in 6 months, including her 17-year-old daughter who has always resided with the children.

    So far, the case to win her children back has cost £5k. In order to carry out the fact-finding process, s7 report and the remaining hearings that follow, it will cost in the region of another £18k. So not only does S have the worry of having to battle to get her children back, she now needs to worry about how she is going to fund this battle, a battle that she struggles massively with every day.

    S really needs some financial support much more than her friends and family can give. S needs the best shot at getting her children home and with your help, she’ll be able to match the father’s legal team, to finally get the truth out and get her children home.

    Of course, life is never going to be the same, but with her children by her side, she’ll be able to wake up without feeling anxious, she’ll be able to fall asleep not worrying and she’ll finally have peace of mind that she has her babies back.

    ******What Your Donations Will Be Used For******

    The funds will go entirely towards legal fees for S and will cover solicitor and barrister fees.

    ******Thank you******

    Thank you so much for reading this far and wanting to know more about S’s story. We would be grateful for any donations.

    If you are unable to contribute financially, but still want to help, we would be grateful if this GoFundMe page could be shared far and wide.

    Please note that due to legal reasons and an ongoing case, we are unable to share any names of the parties involved.

    However, we will make sure to provide updates on any new developments.

    THANK YOU!

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-s-get-her-babies-back

  395. In response to the individual who wrote on here previously about Thames valley police assaulting her husband (I cannot find that comment as I am writing this) but I would like to inform everyone that my husband was also assaulted by Thames valley police in March 2016. We too had the same experience with judge Oliver running kangaroos in the courts. Me and my husband made an official complaint to the judicial conduct investigations office and within one week, we had two Thames valley police officers come to our home late in the evening. They entered our premises because they said they were doing a welfare check but once they came into our home, my husband was grabbed into a headlock whilst I was pushed back and held back by the other police officer. My husband was taken into the bathroom where his head was immersed into the bath which was full of water. TVP wanted him to retract the complaint to the judicial conduct investigations office because it was having an inappropriate effect on Simon Oliver and the level of complaints being put onto his record. My husband who is 70 years old still refused to retract the complaint and him and me what both arrested for assaulting police officers. My husband had head injuries because his head was violently being banged into the bath when he was being immersed and taken out continuously. The outcome was that they eventually dropped the charges for assaulting police officers because they could not justify why they came to our premises in the first place. No record existed of any complaints for them to have a need to come and do a welfare check. Within a few months we ended up moving and never told anyone where we went in case Thames valley police stitch us up for something else.

    Our complaint to the judicial conduct investigations office was relating to judge Oliver insinuating that he wanted to have a relationship with our grandson in return for Newbury council dropping the case against our granddaughter

    Respectfully submitted
    Ann

  396. We are sorry you went through this. The Ministry of justice have installed an upgraded alarm in the judicial pervert (Simon Olivers) home whilst his victims are assaulted by the very people who are supposed to protect the public and uphold the law. Meanwhile, the Freemason lodge encourage this activity by protecting him. This is what the Freemasons are about, a shameful and embarrassing organisation who enjoy acts of crime against civilians. Nothing charitable about this organisation exists with the way one of their Masons behave!

    More reason why we were created and why we remain in operation until today.

    We said this before, we are here for you the public. We will not sell out and no amount of money or threats will back us down. If you have any concerns, speak up and keep writing on here. Do not remain silent.

    From the team at judges behaving badly

  397. New Zealand child abuse inquiry finds quarter of a million harmed in state and faith-based care

    By Praveen Menon

    WELLINGTON (Reuters) – Up to a quarter of a million children, young people and vulnerable adults were physically and sexually abused in New Zealand’s faith-based and state care institutions from the 1960s to early 2000s, a public inquiry revealed on Wednesday.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/newzealand-abuse/new-zealand-child-abuse-inquiry-finds-quarter-of-a-million-harmed-in-state-and-faith-based-care-idUSKBN28Q0C6

  399. Dear All

    We would like to inform everyone that we have received information that Simon Oliver is now receiving counselling by a professional called Tom Sobel based in Fitzrovia in Central London. The charges for this professional service is £385 per session. Fortunately so, Simon Oliver is still hearing children’s cases at the central London family court in the meantime when clearly is not in a fit state to do so. Many of his victims were mocked for using counselling services and were even taken advantage of. The whole purpose of him using a counselling services is to make himself feel better about all the harm he has caused everyone else. We have no remorse for him or his mental state and at a time like this, our thoughts are with all of his victims.

    From the team at judges behaving badly

  400. PCC threatens to sue Justice Ministry over young offenders’ treatment at Rainsbrook
    by Rebecca Paveley
    24 December 2020
    MTC

    A PARISH in Kent is threatening legal action against the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) for the treatment of children 135 miles away, after it was revealed that children as young as 15 were being held in near-solitary confinement during lockdown.

    The Vicar of St Margaret’s, Rainham, near Gillingham, the Revd Nathan Ward, has instructed solicitors to act on behalf of his church to demand that the MOJ take urgent action to protect children at Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre (STC), near Rugby, Warwickshire.

    A joint inspection team from Ofsted, the prisons inspectorate, and the Care Quality Commission, found that newly arrived children at Rainsbrook were kept in their rooms for more than 23 hours a day, were allowed out for only 30 minutes a day for 14 days, and banned from interaction with other children.

    The inspectors have issued an “Urgent Notification” letter to the Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, requiring him to set out within 28 days how he will address their concerns.

    Although it is believed that no one from the parish is held at Rainsbrook, Mr Ward was prompted to act when he could find no one else campaigning for improved conditions. Before being ordained, he was manager of Brook House Detention Centre, near Gatwick. He left and became a whistleblower in 2014, driven by concerns about the treatment of inmates.

    He is supported by a deputy churchwarden, a former crown prosecutor; and another PCC member is a human-rights lawyer.

    Irwin Mitchell LLP, acting for St Margaret’s, demanded that isolation for children be stopped immediately, that all children received appropriate educational provision, and that urgent steps are taken to address the serious failings found by inspectors.

    Without an urgent written response to these demands, legal action would ensue, the solicitors told the MOJ, in a letter seen by the Church Times.
    Advertisement

    Mr Ward has accused the MOJ of systematic failure, as this revelation is only the latest in a number of serious issues highlighted by inspectors at the centre over the past four years, including the increased use of force and restraint against children, and rising levels of violence.

    “We cannot stand by and watch children being mistreated this way,” Mr Ward said. “The Ministry of Justice has systematically failed for months, and the Secretary of State must take urgent remedial action.

    “It’s just not enough to speak of sending a team in to look at things. These latest findings are not the first systematic failures at Rainsbrook. The ongoing violation of the rights of some of the most vulnerable children in our society is an absolute scandal, and it isn’t enough simply to send in civil servants. Children must be properly cared for now, before further damage is done.

    “We are taking this action to try and ensure no child is kept in solitary confinement unlawfully over Christmas and beyond.”

    The Ministry of Justice said it could not comment during legal proceedings, or when proceedings were threatened.

    In a response to the issuing of the Urgent Notification last week, the Justice Minister Lucy Frazer said that the findings were “incredibly concerning and disappointing, particularly as MTC gave repeated assurances they would act on previous warnings”.

    She said that children would no longer be placed at Rainsbrook, and a formal action plan will be published in response to the Notification by the 15 January deadline.

    Rainsbrook is privately run by the US prison company MTC, and held 45 boys and girls at the time of the inspection. It takes children from the ages of 12 to 17. It issued a statement in response to the inspectors’ report, recognising the severity of the situation and listing the improvements made at the STC after earlier inspections.

    “Previous Ofsted reports have acknowledged the improvements made since we took over in 2016 and recognised that children and young people now have dedicated care officers, key workers and are supported by a forensic psychology team. They also reported that training, pay and conditions have improved for colleagues under our management.

    “We recognise there is more work to do to improve the centre, and we do accept more should have been done during this challenging period. We understand what changes we need to make to ensure this does not happen again.
    OTHER STORIES
    Kent bishops call on Government to intervene in Dover

    THE Archbishop of Canterbury and other bishops in Kent have called for the Government to “intervene decisively” to resolve the situation in Dover, where more than 2800 lorries are queuing to enter the port and the Channel Tunnel

    “We are confident the new leadership and the new measures will deliver safe and effective services that will protect and safeguard the children and young people in our care.”

    For its part, St Margaret’s has produced a statement justifying its involvement: “So what is Jesus saying to us about Rainsbrook STC? Is he saying ‘This is out of your area; leave it for others; concentrate on things closer to home’? Or is he saying ‘Go and act in my name’?

    “We firmly believe it’s the latter, and that God has brought us together with our particular gifts, experience and contacts to serve him in this way. . .

    “As one of the two remaining STCs in England and Wales (the other is at Oakhill, Milton Keynes) it is quite possible that Rainsbrook has, or will at some stage have, children from Medway there. But even if that were not so, we would still feel compelled to intervene in Christ’s name: ‘Just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.’”

    https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2021/1-january/news/uk/pcc-threatens-to-sue-justice-ministry-over-young-offenders-treatment-at-rainsbrook

  402. To: Chief Constable John Campbell
    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Thank you Chief Constable John Campbell and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg for a
    most unexpected 2020 Christmas present, some five years after the report was written :

    Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Reading, Berkshire

    Thames Valley Police internal review

    Protecting the Vulnerable

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife,
    they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven misdiagnosis that he
    is bipolar and hyper manic”.

    “BP Collins Solicitors then fail to notify the County Court that Mr. Lawrence is subject to a
    Part V11 order and is therefore under the Court of Protection”.

  403. Judge guilty after threatening to use influence to get cash from businessmen in row

    EXCLUSIVE: Crown court beak Mark Horton tried to bully a company’s owners for payments after it went bust. The
    legal eagle was a shareholder in a family firm, breaking rules that ban judges from involvement in running businesses

    A judge has been found guilty of misconduct after threatening to use his influence to get cash from businessmen in a dispute.

    Crown Court beak Mark Horton tried to bully a company’s owners for payments after it went bust.

    The legal eagle was a shareholder in a family firm, breaking rules that ban judges from involvement in running businesses.

    An investigating High Court judge gave Horton a warning – but allowed him to stay a Bristol circuit judge despite allegations he abused his position to threaten legal action.

    In a statement, the Judicial Complaints Investigation Office said: “The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice have issued a formal warning to His Honour Judge Mark Anthony Horton after an investigation determined he did not exercise appropriate caution when a family business of which he was a shareholder found itself in a dispute.

    “He expressed his views of the law, threatened legal action, and exerted pressure in circumstances when he was aware his judicial status was known to those he was communicating with.”

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/judge-guilty-after-threatening-use-23252525

  404. Former US tech envoy appointed MoJ permanent secretary

    By Monidipa Fouzder4 January 2021

    An economist who was previously in charge of reform and savings programmes at the Ministry of Justice is returning to lead the department as permanent secretary.

    Antonia Romeo, currently permanent secretary at the Department for International Trade (DIT), will take up her new post on 18 January.

    Romeo has held several senior government roles since joining the civil service as an economist 20 years ago. Prior to becoming permanent secretary at DIT in March 2017, she was special envoy to US technology companies, based in New York.

    Antonia Romeo returns to department where she was responsible for reform and savings programmes

    As director-general for transformation at the MoJ, Romeo was responsible for reform and savings programmes and digital services, communications, group HR and group estates. She has also been director-general for criminal justice, responsible for all criminal justice policy and major programmes.

    Romeo said: ‘I have spent the majority of my career in the department, working on its vital agenda of protecting the public and reducing reoffending, ensuring access to justice, and upholding the rule of law. I know first-hand the incredible job that the 75,000 MoJ staff do every day, and I’m looking forward to working with the lord chancellor, ministers and the team on this important work.’

    Lord chancellor Robert Buckland QC MP said: ‘I am delighted to welcome Antonia back to the Ministry of Justice. I know that she shares my passion for renewing the justice system, protecting the public and reforming offenders, and I look forward to working with her as we build back safer from the pandemic.’

    Cabinet secretary Simon Case said: ‘Antonia’s appointment is great news for the Ministry of Justice. As an experienced permanent secretary she brings with her a wealth of experience garnered in a variety of roles across government, as well as a deep understanding of the Ministry of Justice.’

    Mike Driver has been leading the department on an interim basis after Sir Richard Heaton quit as MoJ permanent secretary last summer.

    Buckland thanked Driver ‘for his exceptional leadership as interim permanent secretary, and for his help in navigating the challenges the department has faced over the latter half of the last year’.

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/former-us-tech-envoy-appointed-moj-permanent-secretary/5106884.article

  405. Not had a very pleasant experience with Simon Oliver. He constantly was scratching his genitals when I was presenting my case. The whole courtroom could see it and he had no shame in doing it.

  406. From all accounts, he is totally shameless about everything. Perhaps he has something on those above him because it doesn’t seem like his superiors will take any action against him for anything. It’s a bit worrying to know that the problem goes all the way to the top of the food chain.

  411. It isn’t the case that one judge is corrupt. The whole of the English Justice system is institutionally corrupt. In particular the Family Courts are a mafia run for the benefit of Lawyers and Judges. The rot starts at the very top of the legal system – the House of Lords. The Ministry of Justice is a “Smoke and Mirrors” organisation which allows the government and ministers to interfere with the process of Justice. The Crown Prosecution Service is also a “Smoke and Mirrors” organisation which allows the government to interfere in the process of justice – or Injustice as is very often the case in England. There is no point in reporting matters to the Police as they will take no action. There is no political will in the country to make changes, because MP’s who try to fight for Justice are quietly sidelined and either neutralised or are given sinecures to shut them up. A prime example is the MP “Johnnie Mercer. In his maiden speech he criticised the Governments lack of action in respect of Servicemen and Women who become mentally ill after serving their country. However “Johnny” Mercer changed his tune a year or so after being elected. It transpired that he had been given a sinecure with a salary of 85,000 pounds a year, for four hours work a week to shut him up. And from being a lowly Captain in the Royal Artillery, his political career rapidly took him to his current position as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Minister for Defence People and Veterans). A meteoric career progression by any account. And a case of putting a “fox in charge of the chickens”. Mentally ill Servicemen and Women now have no voice and no help. They are suppressed and treated with contempt. They have no recourse to Justice. Now review the case of “Lord” Greville Janner an MP who was elevated to the House of Lords by Tony Blair, despite being the subject of Police investigations for Crimes against Children for many years. Janner was the subject of child sex abuse allegations dating back to 1955. Three police investigations took place in the 1990s and 2000s, but no charges were brought. Following a fourth inquiry, he was charged in 2015 with offences against nine alleged victims. Police say 40 people accused him of abuse. The peer, who had dementia, was ruled unfit to plead, and died aged 87 before a trial of the facts could take place. An independent inquiry in 2016 found the three earlier investigations were “missed chances” to prosecute him. The Janner case is just one example of corruption and protectionism in the Justice System. I have been reading this website for a couple of years now and note that no progress has been made in bringing a corrupt Judge to face Justice. Nor will he ever be. It isn’t just one Judge. The whole judicial system is corrupt.

  412. Richard, all of your comments are well-received. You summed it all up succinctly and eloquently. Thank you.

  413. I was asked by a social worker called Rachel from Wokingham children’s services to give Simon Oliver £30,000 to release my child. I have no doubt that Rachel was working with Simon Oliver all along and reading all these comments makes it clearer that this is just a money-making extortion

  414. Hi Richard
    you are right that Simon Oliver has had very little progress to bring him to justice. However, the case involving a medical professional was done very quickly in the high court. Most of the judgements are pre-written and published online weeks before it was handed down by the high court. The last judge that I heard was called Matthew Nicklin and he has been scrutinised publicly about his corrupt decision. It was known what he was going to do all along because he’s Simon Oliver’s friend. The ministry of justice used taxpayers money to silence the alleged author of this site just so that Simon Oliver can be covered up and be allowed to carry on to do what he does. The government legal department was representing Simon Oliver and Simon did not even have to attend court even once. Everything was done very very quickly but because this site is exactly what it says it is, and that is for justice, it remains online even though the corruption goes on. I guess the ministry of justice has now met it’s match.

  415. Hi Someone, The Ministry of Justice – or should I call it the Ministry of Corruption, may have “met its match”, but to what end.? The website is still running but the judicial corruption continues unabated. Now I am not complaining nor casting aspersions, however, as I perceive it, the website’s purpose is to bring to the public attention the activities of a corrupt judge. And I also think that the website provides a very much needed platform for people to record the injustices which have been done to them by people like Simon Oliver and those that support and protect him. But after so many years, Simon Oliver is still practising as a corrupt judge. Now just let me put something in front of you which might give some perspective to the Simon Oliver case……. Back in the 1970’s my army unit was selected to undertake royal duties. As we were preparing to undertake this “great honour”, we were visited by an officer from the Household Division and given a lecture on what to expect. One thing that stuck in my mind was that during the briefing we were given very explicit instructions about not accepting invitations from the rich and famous, politicians and the so called denizens of “high Society” (which includes Judges and Lawyers). The officer made the comment that some of these people are a bit keen on young lads, young soldiers (and younger, he added). But, he continued, some of them are very dangerous people so, stay away from them and don’t get involved. In the event, I didn’t get involved with the royal duties but went abroad. However some years later, there were reports of some really nasty goings on involving politicians amongst others and the name Dolphin Square raises its ugly head. Have a read of this article – admittedly from the Mail, but some of the quotes are worth reading: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2844765/Paedophile-orgies-luxury-flats-claims-three-boys-murdered-VIPs-Special-report-growing-stench-cover-Establishment.html. Now, whilst the investigation into the Dolphin square business was ongoing, the establishment managed to shift the focus away from the real criminals and focus on the witness called Nick, who was eventually discredited. And in order to shift the focus more fully away from the politico-legal epicentre, the police were put off the real scent and started very high visibility investigations of famous actors and figures in the entertainment industry. And the BBC were given the job of ensuring that the full glare of publicity was used, for example on the raid of Cliff Richards house. Remember that in my previous comments I said that the Ministry of Injustice and the Crown Persecution Service are both “smoke and mirror organisations?” Well, what happened with the Dolphin Square investigation was that by a clever manipulation of smoke and mirrors, the focus of the police investigation was shifted from the real culprits, whith the help of the BBC. Now, if you go back and read the background to the Dolphin Square matter, you can see that there was much more to it all than the simple allegations of a mentally disturbed fantasist called Nick. In fact there is a background of, not only child molestation and other things but, the murder of a magistrates son, corruption involving multimillion pound building projects and much more. So the reason why you can’t get Simon Oliver to be properly investigated is that he is simply the pimple on top of s suppurating tumour that lies beneath.

  416. From: Copping Valerie (PSD)
    Professional.Standards@thamesvalley.pnn.police.uk
    Sent: 23 November 2016 14:05To: ‘len lawrence’
    Subject: RE: Telephone Enquiry 22/11/16

    Dear Mr Lawrence

    I can confirm that DI 4564 Watts carried out the review of your case in Feb 2016
    and at the time he was with our Force CID. He has since moved on to another
    department, therefore I would ask that you do not send e-mails to DI Watts
    regarding your issues, as our Force CID Dept is fully aware of your case.

    Thames Valley Police internal review 2015/16.
    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts 4564
    Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Reading
    While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins Solicitors acting for his
    wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven misdiagnosis
    that he is bipolar and hyper manic. BP Collins Solicitors then fail to notify the County
    Court that Mr. Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the Court
    of Protection.

    Ass. Ch. Constable Tim De Meyer – Crime and Criminal Justice – Thames Valley Police.
    Tim De Meyer would you explain the special proceeds that you put into place to prevent
    any Thames Valley Police officer from investigating my case. As early as 2005 the Crown
    Prosecution Service had requested Thames Valley Police to visit me. Had Thames Valley
    Police visited me they would have located five Court of Protection Medical Certificates
    of neurological incapacity.

    Leonard Lawrence

    17 January 2021

  418. He also tweaks his nipples, asks for sex in the courtroom and scratches his balls openly in addition to taking bribes. The ministry of justice always responds and says that there is no evidence of it. Well, why don’t they try to get audio recordings and CCTV put in to place which they seem to not be doing for centuries now. If Simon Oliver was in America, he would be serving 300 years in prison for child trafficking.

  419. Simon Oliver’s judgements are also smoke and mirrors and once he makes it, you’ll never see him ever again. But create a website about him and he’ll come running with the Ministry of justice, the Government Legal department and the High court and try every dirty trick to get what he wants. Unfortunately, this time it hasn’t worked.

  420. Interesting response from the police
    ” Dear Mr Lawrence
    I can confirm that DI 4564 Watts carried out the review of your case in Feb 2016
    and at the time he was with our Force CID. He has since moved on to another
    department, therefore I would ask that you do not send e-mails to DI Watts
    regarding your issues, as our Force CID Dept is fully aware of your case.”

    They are “fully aware of your case” but they do nothing. And a small matter but, the police aren’t a “Force” they are a “service”.

    I suffered ten years of mental and physical abuse at the hands of a drug addicted and violent wife. I was suffering from PTSD and Clinical Depression. My GP refused to treat me for my illnesses. My wife tried with the help of our GP to get me sectioned, but luckily the psychiatrist at Guildford University to whom they conned me into going to see is an honest – as far as I know – man. He referred me to a private psychologist at the Nuffield hospital who treated me for my illnesses for 4 years at my own expense. So bad was my illness that until my divorce in 2013 I was under the impression that I had been receiving treatment for about 11 months. During the period 2003 -2012, I called the police on a number of occasions when my ex wife was violent. And during that time I received calls from the police “Victim Support” agency advising me that my life was in danger and advising me to “go to a place of safety”. On one occasion that I called the police, they had to use pepper spray 3 times before she would drop the carving knife she had tried to kill me with. They arrested her and then let her go a few hours later. No further action was taken. On another occasion, after a morning of abuse and violence, she took off in her car – she has been fraudulently claiming full disability allowance since about 1994, which includes a free car – I called the police who followed her over 2 counties with three police cars and a helicopter, before ramming her car to stop her. She then fought with the police and it took four officers to restrain her. The police took no further action. There is much more to my story but I won’t bore you with it here. In 2012, I finally managed to break free and left home. My intention was to kill myself. There was no option. There was no help. I was rescued by a good friend who convinced me to go to the far east and stay with him. During the divorce that followed, the court stole everything I had worked for during the previous 40 years. Everything I owned was taken. I was left homeless – they took 2 houses – I was left with the clothes I was wearing, on the eve of retirement. I don’t live in the UK anymore. The divorce court robbed me of my right to medical care, the right to vote, the right of safety. And, to add insult to injury, they awarded an incredible amount of costs against me which I had no hope of paying – and they took half of my army pension as well. There are many like me. No lawyer will touch my case as they know that there is no justice to be had. And I have no more money or property to steal. When I wrote to the disgusting “Johny” Mercer MP for help, he promised to help me and then ignored my emails. When I kept writing to him he sent me a sarcastic email thanking me for my “wartime service”.

    I wish you all well in your fight for justice. But after so many years of being abused by the “judicial” system in the UK, I have come to the conclusion that justice is a Chimera. That doesn’t mean that I will stop fighting though.

    Richard Montgomery

  421. Urge the United Nations to Protect Real Human Rights
    The Secretary General of the United Nations has asked us how he can strengthen the defence of Human Rights. Write now and ask him to defend the right to life, family and the right of parents to educate their children.

    The last United Nations General Assembly approved resolution A / RES / 74/151 (paragraph 12) where it suggests to the Secretary General that he consult with member states and NGOs on how he can strengthen work on human rights through international cooperation and under the principles of non-selection, impartiality and objectivity.

    The Secretary General will collect all the proposals received before January 22 with the aim of presenting a report at the 70th General Assembly.

    This is our opportunity to tell the United Nations what we think:

    Defend the right to life. It is the first of the rights and is included both in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the Charter of Social and Political Rights.

    Defend the family as the basic cell of society. This implies a transversal vision of both the policies and the legal framework to act with a family perspective. It also involves protecting marriages in crisis through mediation services. And not consider marriage to coexistence realities that do not guarantee generational change or the appropriate environment for socialization.

    Defend freedom. The absence of measures against dictatorships such as Venezuela, which disturb human rights worryingly, and the passivity of the UN disappoint the expectations of citizens and trust in international institutions.

    Recently, the United Nations has congratulated itself on the approval of abortion in Argentina. It is exactly the path that should not be taken: for an international institution to defend the violation of the highest of all rights is anything but to strengthen the defence of human rights and the most direct path to institutional discredit and citizen disaffection.

    —

    For more information: https://citizengo.org/en-ca/lf/184827-urge-united-nations-protect-real-human-rights

    THE RIGHT TO FAMILY

  422. Richard Montgomery. says:
    January 20, 2021 at 1:03 am
    Dear Mr Lawrence
    THAMES VALLEY POLICE
    They are “fully aware of your case” but they do nothing.
    And a small matter but, the police aren’t a “Force” they are a “service”.

    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Richard,
    In 2016 Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrell, Head of Economic Crime Unit, Lodden Valley,
    Thames Valley Police wrote to me saying that the internal review had failed to find any
    evidence. In 2020 I could evidence that Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell’s assertion was
    untrue. See below.

    Thames Valley Police
    February 2016
    Internal Review
    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts 4564
    Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Reading
    While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for
    his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven
    misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hyper manic. BP Collins Solicitors then fail to
    notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is
    therefore is under the Court of Protection.

    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrell is now :
    Detective Superintendent Gavin Tyrell
    Head of City and National Lead Force Fraud Operations,
    City of London Police.

    However,
    In 2015 Offences of Fraud Perjury and other more serious offence were identified by another
    Police Force against me. Thereafter, Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrell had a most enlighting
    telephone conversation with the Serious and Organised Crime Unit, Devon and Cornwall
    Police, around August 2015. I now have a record of this telephone call.

    Detective Inspector Gavin Tyrrell alleges that he was being directed by the detective below:
    Detective Superintendent Gill Wootton, Head of Specialist Operations, Thames Valley Police.
    Also, that special procedures have been put into place to deal with me Leonard Lawrence, all
    matters to go directly to Professional Standards headed by Chief Supt. Timothy De Meyer.
    Timothy De Meyer is now Assistant Chief Constable Tim De Meyer – Crime and Criminal
    Justice Thames Valley Police.

    The information that I seek is; was the following two officers aware of the findings of
    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts 4564 Internal Review:
    Deputy Chief Constable (now Chief Constable) John Campbell, Thames Valley Police?
    Chief Constable (Now retired) Francis Habgood, Thames Valley Police?

    Thursday, February 15 2018
    ​Sir Thomas Winsor, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary
    THAMES Valley Police are failing to record more than 35,000 crimes per year, a shock
    report says, including serious crimes such as rape, sexual offences, domestic violence.

    Chief Constable Francis Habgood left Thames Valley Police in March 2019 after the
    publication of the above report by Sir Thomas Winsor HMIC. Shortly after he was appointed
    as the independent chair of the Buckinghamshire Safeguarding Children Board.
    [35,000 crimes per year not recorded!]

  423. I’m going to create my own website now called child abductors behaving badly and Simon Oliver will be the headline. I will then expect him to take me to court and sue me. In the meantime, his son Benjamin and his wife Kathleen along with their two disgusting children will be cowering in the corner of FSP law so that no one recognises the sick and shameful child abduction family.

  424. To: Richard Montgomery.
    From Leonard Lawrence

    Dear Richard,
    I keep returning to read your posting and would like to know more, including the name of the
    lawyers and judge involved in your case.

    EXPRESS NEWSPAPER 7,000 left to ROT on our streets.
    Homeless charities estimate there are about 7000 ex-servicemen and women living rough and in desperate
    need of a roof over their head.

    I was left to ROT on the streets of Buckinghamshire in 2005 by the now former Detective Superintendent
    Gillian Wootton, Thames Valley Police!

    Files released to me by another policee Force identify that I need to focus on this police officer:
    Assistant Chief Constable, Timothy De Meyer, Thames Valley Police.

    ESTD Conference Bern 12th Nov 2017
    Everyone speaks of the wrongfulness of an evil act, but inexplicably no one is held accountable for the wrongfulness of failure to do good. And thus, fundamental social evils remain unresolved.
    Tsunesaburo Makiguchi (1871-1944)

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    Richard Montgomery. says:
    January 20, 2021 at 1:03 am

    Interesting response from the police
    ” Dear Mr Lawrence
    I can confirm that DI 4564 Watts carried out the review of your case in Feb 2016
    and at the time he was with our Force CID. He has since moved on to another
    department, therefore I would ask that you do not send e-mails to DI Watts
    regarding your issues, as our Force CID Dept is fully aware of your case.”

    They are “fully aware of your case” but they do nothing. And a small matter but, the police aren’t a “Force” they are a “service”.

    I suffered ten years of mental and physical abuse at the hands of a drug addicted and violent wife. I was suffering from PTSD and Clinical Depression. My GP refused to treat me for my illnesses. My wife tried with the help of our GP to get me sectioned, but luckily the psychiatrist at Guildford University to whom they conned me into going to see is an honest – as far as I know – man. He referred me to a private psychologist at the Nuffield hospital who treated me for my illnesses for 4 years at my own expense. So bad was my illness that until my divorce in 2013 I was under the impression that I had been receiving treatment for about 11 months. During the period 2003 -2012, I called the police on a number of occasions when my ex wife was violent. And during that time I received calls from the police “Victim Support” agency advising me that my life was in danger and advising me to “go to a place of safety”. On one occasion that I called the police, they had to use pepper spray 3 times before she would drop the carving knife she had tried to kill me with. They arrested her and then let her go a few hours later. No further action was taken. On another occasion, after a morning of abuse and violence, she took off in her car – she has been fraudulently claiming full disability allowance since about 1994, which includes a free car – I called the police who followed her over 2 counties with three police cars and a helicopter, before ramming her car to stop her. She then fought with the police and it took four officers to restrain her. The police took no further action. There is much more to my story but I won’t bore you with it here. In 2012, I finally managed to break free and left home. My intention was to kill myself. There was no option. There was no help. I was rescued by a good friend who convinced me to go to the far east and stay with him. During the divorce that followed, the court stole everything I had worked for during the previous 40 years. Everything I owned was taken. I was left homeless – they took 2 houses – I was left with the clothes I was wearing, on the eve of retirement. I don’t live in the UK anymore. The divorce court robbed me of my right to medical care, the right to vote, the right of safety. And, to add insult to injury, they awarded an incredible amount of costs against me which I had no hope of paying – and they took half of my army pension as well. There are many like me. No lawyer will touch my case as they know that there is no justice to be had. And I have no more money or property to steal. When I wrote to the disgusting “Johny” Mercer MP for help, he promised to help me and then ignored my emails. When I kept writing to him he sent me a sarcastic email thanking me for my “wartime service”.

    I wish you all well in your fight for justice. But after so many years of being abused by the “judicial” system in the UK, I have come to the conclusion that justice is a Chimera. That doesn’t mean that I will stop fighting though.

    Richard Montgomery

  425. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-judges-misconduct/

    PART 1 | OBJECTIONS OVERRULED
    Thousands of U.S. judges who broke laws or oaths remained on the bench

    REUTERS ILLUSTRATION/Jason Schneider

    In the past dozen years, state and local judges have repeatedly escaped public accountability for misdeeds that have victimized thousands. Nine of 10 kept their jobs, a Reuters investigation found – including an Alabama judge who unlawfully jailed hundreds of poor people, many of them Black, over traffic fines.

    By MICHAEL BERENS and JOHN SHIFFMAN in MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA Filed June 30, 2020, noon GMT
    Judge Les Hayes once sentenced a single mother to 496 days behind bars for failing to pay traffic tickets. The sentence was so stiff it exceeded the jail time Alabama allows for negligent homicide.

    Marquita Johnson, who was locked up in April 2012, says the impact of her time in jail endures today. Johnson’s three children were cast into foster care while she was incarcerated. One daughter was molested, state records show. Another was physically abused.

    “Judge Hayes took away my life and didn’t care how my children suffered,” said Johnson, now 36. “My girls will never be the same.”

    Fellow inmates found her sentence hard to believe. “They had a nickname for me: The Woman with All the Days,” Johnson said. “That’s what they called me: The Woman with All the Days. There were people who had committed real crimes who got out before me.”

    In 2016, the state agency that oversees judges charged Hayes with violating Alabama’s code of judicial conduct. According to the Judicial Inquiry Commission, Hayes broke state and federal laws by jailing Johnson and hundreds of other Montgomery residents too poor to pay fines. Among those jailed: a plumber struggling to make rent, a mother who skipped meals to cover the medical bills of her disabled son, and a hotel housekeeper working her way through college.

    Hayes, a judge since 2000, admitted in court documents to violating 10 different parts of the state’s judicial conduct code. One of the counts was a breach of a judge’s most essential duty: failing to “respect and comply with the law.”

    DAUGHTERS ABUSED: When Marquita Johnson couldn’t afford to pay traffic fines that had accumulated for some eight years, Judge Les Hayes sentenced her to more than a year in jail. Her daughters were cast into foster care. One was physically abused, court records show, and another was molested. REUTERS/Chris Aluka Berry
    Despite the severity of the ruling, Hayes wasn’t barred from serving as a judge. Instead, the judicial commission and Hayes reached a deal. The former Eagle Scout would serve an 11-month unpaid suspension. Then he could return to the bench.

    Until he was disciplined, Hayes said in an interview with Reuters, “I never thought I was doing something wrong.”

    This week, Hayes is set to retire after 20 years as a judge. In a statement to Reuters, Hayes said he was “very remorseful” for his misdeeds.

    Community activists say his departure is long overdue. Yet the decision to leave, they say, should never have been his to make, given his record of misconduct.

    “He should have been fired years ago,” said Willie Knight, pastor of North Montgomery Baptist Church. “He broke the law and wanted to get away with it. His sudden retirement is years too late.”

    Hayes is among thousands of state and local judges across America who were allowed to keep positions of extraordinary power and prestige after violating judicial ethics rules or breaking laws they pledged to uphold, a Reuters investigation found.

    RELATED CONTENT

    The Teflon Robe: Read the series

    Reuters database: Judges who were publicly disciplined – and what they did

    Methodology and Q&A: How we examined misconduct

    How to use the searchable database to explore the disciplinary files of judges across America

    Judges have made racist statements, lied to state officials and forced defendants to languish in jail without a lawyer – and then returned to the bench, sometimes with little more than a rebuke from the state agencies overseeing their conduct.

    Recent media reports have documented failures in judicial oversight in South Carolina, Louisiana and Illinois. Reuters went further.

    In the first comprehensive accounting of judicial misconduct nationally, Reuters identified and reviewed 1,509 cases from the last dozen years – 2008 through 2019 – in which judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct. In addition, reporters identified another 3,613 cases from 2008 through 2018 in which states disciplined wayward judges but kept hidden from the public key details of their offenses – including the identities of the judges themselves.

    All told, 9 of every 10 judges were allowed to return to the bench after they were sanctioned for misconduct, Reuters determined. They included a California judge who had sex in his courthouse chambers, once with his former law intern and separately with an attorney; a New York judge who berated domestic violence victims; and a Maryland judge who, after his arrest for driving drunk, was allowed to return to the bench provided he took a Breathalyzer test before each appearance.

    The news agency’s findings reveal an “excessively” forgiving judicial disciplinary system, said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University who writes about judicial ethics. Although punishment short of removal from the bench is appropriate for most misconduct cases, Gillers said, the public “would be appalled at some of the lenient treatment judges get” for substantial transgressions.

    Among the cases from the past year alone:

    PUBLIC WARNING (2019)

    JACK ROBISON

    District Court, Texas

    Burst into a jury deliberation room, exclaiming that God told him the defendant was innocent.
    The Herald-Zeitung/Handout via REUTERS

    In Utah, a judge texted a video of a man’s scrotum to court clerks. He was reprimanded but remains on the bench.

    In Indiana, three judges attending a conference last spring got drunk and sparked a 3 a.m. brawl outside a White Castle fast-food restaurant that ended with two of the judges shot. Although the state supreme court found the three judges had “discredited the entire Indiana judiciary,” each returned to the bench after a suspension.

    In Texas, a judge burst in on jurors deliberating the case of a woman charged with sex trafficking and declared that God told him the defendant was innocent. The offending judge received a warning and returned to the bench. The defendant was convicted after a new judge took over the case.

    “There are certain things where there should be a level of zero tolerance,” the jury foreman, Mark House, told Reuters. The judge should have been fined, House said, and kicked off the bench. “There is no justice, because he is still doing his job.”

    Judicial misconduct specialists say such behavior has the potential to erode trust in America’s courts and, absent tough consequences, could give judges license to behave with impunity.

    “When you see cases like that, the public starts to wonder about the integrity and honesty of the system,” said Steve Scheckman, a lawyer who directed Louisiana’s oversight agency and served as deputy director of New York’s. “It looks like a good ol’ boys club.”

    That’s how local lawyers viewed the case of a longtime Alabama judge who concurrently served on the state’s judicial oversight commission. The judge, Cullman District Court’s Kim Chaney, remained on the bench for three years after being accused of violating the same nepotism rules he was tasked with enforcing on the oversight commission. In at least 200 cases, court records show, Judge Chaney chose his own son to serve as a court-appointed defense lawyer for the indigent, enabling the younger Chaney to earn at least $105,000 in fees over two years.

    NEPOTISM BY WATCHDOG: While serving on a state board on judicial misconduct, Judge Kim Chaney violated the very nepotism rules he enforced on other judges, appointing his own son to more than 200 cases in his hometown.
    In February, months after Reuters repeatedly asked Chaney and the state judicial commission about those cases, he retired from the bench as part of a deal with state authorities to end the investigation.

    Tommy Drake, the lawyer who first filed a complaint against Chaney in 2016, said he doubts the judge would have been forced from the bench if Reuters hadn’t examined the case.

    “You know the only reason they did anything about Chaney is because you guys started asking questions,” Drake said. “Otherwise, he’d still be there.”

    Bedrock of American justice

    State and local judges draw little scrutiny even though their courtrooms are the bedrock of the American criminal justice system, touching the lives of millions of people every year.

    The country’s approximately 1,700 federal judges hear 400,000 cases annually. The nearly 30,000 state, county and municipal court judges handle a far bigger docket: more than 100 million new cases each year, from traffic to divorce to murder. Their titles range from justice of the peace to state supreme court justice. Their powers are vast and varied – from determining whether a defendant should be jailed to deciding who deserves custody of a child.

    ‘GUT INSTINCT’: Judge Les Hayes served on the Montgomery Municipal Court in Alabama since 2000. “With my years of experience, I can tell when someone is being truthful with me,” he told Reuters. Courtesy Montgomery Advertiser/Handout via REUTERS
    Each U.S. state has an oversight agency that investigates misconduct complaints against judges. The authority of the oversight agencies is distinct from the power held by appellate courts, which can reverse a judge’s legal ruling and order a new trial. Judicial commissions cannot change verdicts. Rather, they can investigate complaints about the behavior of judges and pursue discipline ranging from reprimand to removal.

    REPRIMANDED (2017)

    SAM BENNINGFIELD

    General Sessions Court, Tennessee

    Granted jail credit to women who received surgical implants for birth control and men who received vasectomies.
    TNcourts.gov/Handout via REUTERS

    Few experts dispute that the great majority of judges behave responsibly, respecting the law and those who appear before them. And some contend that, when judges do falter, oversight agencies are effective in identifying and addressing the behavior. “With a few notable exceptions, the commissions generally get it right,” said Keith Swisher, a University of Arizona law professor who specializes in judicial ethics.

    Others disagree. They note that the clout of these commissions is limited, and their authority differs from state to state. To remove a judge, all but a handful of states require approval of a panel that includes other judges. And most states seldom exercise the full extent of those disciplinary powers.

    As a result, the system tends to err on the side of protecting the rights and reputations of judges while overlooking the impact courtroom wrongdoing has on those most affected by it: people like Marquita Johnson.

    Reuters scoured thousands of state investigative files, disciplinary proceedings and court records from the past dozen years to quantify the personal toll of judicial misconduct. The examination found at least 5,206 people who were directly affected by a judge’s misconduct. The victims cited in disciplinary documents ranged from people who were illegally jailed to those subjected to racist, sexist and other abusive comments from judges in ways that tainted the cases.

    The number is a conservative estimate. The tally doesn’t include two previously reported incidents that affected thousands of defendants and prompted sweeping reviews of judicial conduct.

    “If we have a system that holds a wrongdoer accountable but we fail to address the victims, then we are really losing sight of what a justice system should be all about.”

    Arthur Grim, retired judge
    In Pennsylvania, the state examined the convictions of more than 3,500 teenagers sentenced by two judges. The judges were convicted of taking kickbacks as part of a scheme to fill a private juvenile detention center. In 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court appointed senior judge Arthur Grim to lead a victim review, and the state later expunged criminal records for 2,251 juveniles. Grim told Reuters that every state should adopt a way to compensate victims of judicial misconduct.

    “If we have a system that holds a wrongdoer accountable but we fail to address the victims, then we are really losing sight of what a justice system should be all about,” Grim said.

    In another review underway in Ohio, state public defender Tim Young is scrutinizing 2,707 cases handled by a judge who retired in 2018 after being hospitalized for alcoholism. Mike Benza, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University whose students are helping identify victims, compared the work to current investigations into police abuse of power. “You see one case and then you look to see if it’s systemic,” he said.

    The review, which has been limited during the coronavirus pandemic, may take a year. But Young said the time-consuming task is essential because “a fundamental injustice may have been levied against hundreds or thousands of people.”

    ‘Special rules for judges’

    Most states afford judges accused of misconduct a gentle kind of justice. Perhaps no state better illustrates the shortcomings of America’s system for overseeing judges than Alabama.

    CENSURED (2014)

    SCOTT STEINER

    Superior Court, California

    Had sex in his chambers with his intern and with an attorney practicing before his court.
    Twitter/Handout via REUTERS

    As in most states, Alabama’s nine-member Judicial Inquiry Commission is a mix of lawyers, judges and laypeople. All are appointed. Their deliberations are secret and they operate under some of the most judge-friendly rules in the nation.

    Alabama’s rules make even filing a complaint against a judge difficult. The complaint must be notarized, which means that in theory, anyone who makes misstatements about the judge can be prosecuted for perjury. Complaints about wrongdoing must be made in writing; those that arrive by phone, email or without a notary stamp are not investigated, although senders are notified why their complaints have been summarily rejected. Anonymous written complaints are shredded.

    These rules can leave lawyers and litigants fearing retaliation, commission director Jenny Garrett noted in response to written questions.

    “It’s a ridiculous system that protects judges and makes it easy for them to intimidate anyone with a legitimate complaint,” said Sue Bell Cobb, chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court from 2007 to 2011. In 2009, she unsuccessfully championed changes to the process and commissioned an American Bar Association report that offered a scathing review of Alabama’s rules.

    In most other states, commission staff members can start investigating a judge upon receiving a phone call or email, even anonymous ones, or after learning of questionable conduct from a news report or court filing. In Alabama, staff will not begin an investigation without approval from the commission itself, which convenes about every seven weeks.

    By rule, the commission also must keep a judge who is under scrutiny fully informed throughout an investigation. If a subpoena is issued, the judge receives a simultaneous copy, raising fears about witness intimidation. If a witness gives investigators a statement, the judge receives a transcript. In the U.S. justice system, such deference to individuals under investigation is extremely rare.

    “It’s a ridiculous system that protects judges and makes it easy for them to intimidate anyone with a legitimate complaint.”

    Sue Bell Cobb, former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court
    “Why the need for special rules for judges?” said Michael Levy, a Washington lawyer who has represented clients in high-profile criminal, corporate, congressional and securities investigations. “If judges think it’s fair and appropriate to investigate others for crimes or misconduct without providing those subjects or targets with copies of witness statements and subpoenas, why don’t judges think it’s fair to investigate judges in the same way?”

    Alabama judges also are given an opportunity to resolve investigations confidentially. Reuters interviews and a review of Alabama commission records show the commission has met with judges informally at least 19 times since 2011 to offer corrective “guidance.” The identities of those judges remain confidential, as does the conduct that prompted the meetings. “Not every violation warrants discipline,” commission director Garrett said.

    Since 2008, the commission has brought 21 public cases against judges, including Hayes, charging two this year.

    496
    Number of days Judge Hayes sentenced Marquita Johnson to jail for unpaid traffic tickets.

    Two of the best-known cases brought by the commission involved Roy Moore, who was twice forced out as chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court for defying federal court orders.

    Another Alabama justice fared better in challenging a misconduct complaint, however. Tom Parker, first elected to the state’s high court in 2004, pushed back when the commission investigated him in 2015 for comments he made on the radio criticizing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision legalizing gay marriage.

    Parker sued the commission in federal court, arguing the agency was infringing on his First Amendment rights. He won. Although the commission had dropped its investigation before the ruling, it was ordered to cover Parker’s legal fees: $100,000, or about a fifth of the agency’s total annual budget.

    In 2018, the people of Alabama elected Parker chief justice.

    These days, Parker told Reuters, Alabama judges and the agency that oversees them enjoy “a much better relationship” that’s less politically tinged. “How can I say it? It’s much more respectful between the commission and the judges now.”

    David Sachar, director of the Arkansas Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission: “People can be scared for their life.”

    “Gut instinct”

    Montgomery, Alabama has a deep history of racial conflict, as reflected in the clashing concepts emblazoned on the city’s great seal: “Cradle of the Confederacy” and “Birthplace of the Civil Rights Movement.”

    Jefferson Davis was inaugurated here as Confederate president after the South seceded from the Union in 1861, and his birthday is a state holiday. As was common throughout the South, the city was the site of the lynchings of Black men, crimes now commemorated at a national memorial based here. Police arrested civil rights icon Rosa Parks here in 1955 for refusing to give up her seat on a city bus to a white passenger.

    Today, about 60% of Montgomery’s 198,000 residents are Black, U.S. census records show. Even so, Black motorists account for about 90% of those charged with unpaid traffic tickets, a Reuters examination of court records found. Much of Judge Hayes’ work in municipal court involved traffic cases and the collection of fines. Hayes, who is white, told Reuters that “the majority of people who come before the court are Black.”

    City officials have said that neither race nor economics have played a role in police efforts to enforce outstanding warrants, no matter how minor the offense.

    CONFLICTING HISTORY: The great seal of Montgomery on the entrance to the city council chamber. Reuters/John Shiffman
    In April 2012, Marquita Johnson was among them. Appearing before Hayes on a Wednesday morning, the 28-year-old single mother pleaded for a break.

    Johnson had struggled for eight years to pay dozens of tickets that began with a citation for failing to show proof of insurance. She had insurance, she said. But when she was pulled over, she couldn’t find the card to prove it.

    Even a single ticket was a knockout blow on her minimum-wage waitress salary. In addition to fines, the court assessed a $155 fee to every ticket. Court records show that police often issued her multiple tickets for other infractions during every stop – a practice some residents call “stacking.”

    Under state law, failing to pay even one ticket can result in the suspension of a driver’s license. Johnson’s decision to keep driving nonetheless – taking her children to school or to doctor visits, getting groceries, going to work – led to more tickets and deeper debt.

    “I told Judge Hayes that I had lost my job and needed more time to pay,” she recounted.

    By Hayes’ calculation, Johnson owed more than $12,000 in fines. He sentenced Johnson to 496 days in jail. Hayes arrived at that sentence by counting each day in jail as $25 toward the outstanding debt. A different judge later determined that Johnson actually owed half the amount calculated by Hayes, and that Hayes had incorrectly penalized her over fines she had already paid. To shave time off her sentence, Johnson washed police cars and performed other menial labor while jailed.

    Reiko Callner, director of the Washington state Commission on Judicial Conduct: Judges have unique power.
    Hayes told Reuters that he generally found pleas of poverty hard to believe. “With my years of experience, I can tell when someone is being truthful with me,” Hayes said. He called it “gut instinct” — though he added, in a statement this week, that he also consulted “each defendant’s criminal and traffic history as well as their history of warrants and failures to appear in court.”

    Of course, the law demands more of a judge than a gut call. In a 1983 landmark decision, Bearden v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state judges are obligated to hold a hearing to determine whether a defendant has “willfully” chosen not to pay a fine.

    According to the state’s judicial oversight commission, “Judge Hayes did not make any inquiry into Ms. Johnson’s ability to pay, whether her non-payment was willful.”

    From jail, “I prayed to return to my daughters,” Johnson said. “I was sure that someone would realize that Hayes had made a mistake.”

    She said her worst day in jail was her youngest daughter’s 3rd birthday. From a jail telephone, she tried to sing “Happy Birthday” but slumped to the floor in grief.

    “She was choking up and crying,” said Johnson’s mother, Blanche, who was on the call. “She was devastated to be away from her children so long.”

    When Johnson was freed after 10 months in jail, she learned that strangers had abused her two older children. One is now a teenager; the other is in middle school. “My kids will pay a lifetime for what the court system did to me,” Johnson said. “My daughters get frantic when I leave the house. I know they’ve had nightmares that I’m going to disappear again.”

    Six months after Johnson’s release, Hayes jailed another single Black mother. Angela McCullough, then 40, had been pulled over driving home from Faulkner University, a local community college where she carried a 3.87 grade point average. As a mother of four children, including a disabled adult son, she had returned to college to pursue her dream of becoming a mental health counselor.

    Police ticketed her for failing to turn on her headlights. After a background check, the officer arrested McCullough on a warrant for outstanding traffic tickets. She was later brought before Hayes.

    “I can’t go to jail,” McCullough recalled pleading with the judge. “I’m a mother. I have a disabled son who needs me.”

    Hayes sentenced McCullough to 100 days in jail to pay off a court debt of $1,350, court records show. Her adult son, diagnosed with schizophrenia, was held in an institution until her release.

    HOPES DASHED: Before she was pulled over for failing to turn on her headlights, Angela McCullough carried a 3.87 grade point average at a local community college. Jailed by Judge Les Hayes, she put her tuition money toward fines she owed. “I don’t think I’ll ever be able to afford to go back” to college, she says today. REUTERS/Chris Aluka Berry
    McCullough said she cleaned jail cells in return for time off her sentence. One day, she recalled, she had to clean a blood-soaked cell where a female inmate had slit her wrists.

    She was freed after 20 days, using the money she saved for tuition to pay off her tickets, she said.

    Jail was the darkest chapter of her life, McCullough said, a place where “the devil was trying to take my mind.” Today, she has abandoned her pursuit of a degree. “I don’t think I’ll ever be able to afford to go back.”

    SUSPENDED 6 MONTHS (2017)

    CHRIS KUNZA MENNEMEYER

    Circuit Court, Missouri

    Deliberately postponed the appointment of public defenders in probation violation cases.
    Pike County News/Handout via REUTERS

    A clear sign that something was amiss in Montgomery courts came in November 2013, when a federal lawsuit was filed alleging that city judges were unlawfully jailing the poor. A similar suit was filed in 2014, and two more civil rights cases were filed in 2015. Johnson and McCullough were plaintiffs.

    The lawsuits detailed practices similar to those that helped fuel protests in Ferguson, Missouri, after a white police officer killed a Black teenager in 2014. In a scathing report on the origins of the unrest, the U.S. Department of Justice exposed how Ferguson had systematically used traffic enforcement to raise revenue through excessive fines, a practice that fell disproportionately hard on Black residents.

    “Montgomery is just like Ferguson,” said Karen Jones, a community activist and founder of a local educational nonprofit. Jones has led recent protests in Montgomery in the wake of the killing of George Floyd, the Black man whose death under the knee of a cop in Minneapolis set off worldwide calls for racial justice.

    In Montgomery, “everybody knew that the police targeted Black residents. And I sat in Hayes’ court and watched him squeeze poor people for more money, then toss them in jail where they had to work off debts with free labor to the city.”

    It was years before the flurry of civil rights lawsuits against Hayes and his fellow judges had much impact on the commission. The oversight agency opened its Hayes case in summer 2015, nearly two years after plaintiffs’ lawyers in the civil rights cases filed a complaint with the body. Hayes spent another year and a half on the bench before accepting the suspension.

    OUTRAGED: Community activist Karen Jones says she watched Judge Les Hayes “squeeze poor people for more money, then toss them in jail where they had to work off debts with free labor to the city.” REUTERS/Michael Berens
    Under its own rules, the commission could have filed a complaint and told its staff to investigate Hayes at any time. Commission director Garrett said she is prohibited by law from explaining why the commission didn’t investigate sooner. The investigation went slowly, Garrett said, because it involved reviewing thousands of pages of court records. The commission also was busy with other cases from 2015 to early 2017, Garrett said, issuing charges against five judges, including Moore.

    “Slap in the face”

    A few months after Judge Hayes’ suspension ended, his term as a municipal judge was set to expire. So, the Montgomery City Council took up the question of the judge’s future on March 6, 2018. On the agenda of its meeting: whether to reappoint Hayes to another four-year term.

    UNLAWFUL RULINGS: The Alabama judicial oversight agency’s determination on the wrongdoing of Judge Les Hayes.
    Hayes wasn’t in the audience that night, but powerful supporters were. The city’s chief judge, Milton Westry, told the council that Hayes and his colleagues have changed how they handled cases involving indigent defendants, “since we learned a better way of doing things.” In the wake of the suits, Westry said, Hayes and his peers complied with reforms that required judges to make audio recordings of court hearings and notify lawyers when clients are jailed for failing to pay fines.

    As part of a settlement in the civil case, the city judges agreed to implement changes for at least two years. Those reforms have since been abandoned, Reuters found. Both measures were deemed too expensive, Hayes and city officials confirmed.

    Residents who addressed the council were incredulous that the city would consider reappointing Hayes. Jones, the community activist, reminded council members that Hayes had “pleaded guilty to violating the very laws he was sworn to uphold.”

    Resident Phyllis Harvey-Hall told the Montgomery City Council that reappointing Judge Les Hayes was not fair.
    The city council voted to rehire Hayes to a fifth consecutive term.

    Marquita Johnson said she can’t understand why a judge whose unlawful rulings changed the lives of hundreds has himself emerged virtually unscathed.

    “Hiring Hayes back to the bench was a slap in the face to everyone,” Johnson said. “It was a message that we don’t matter.”

    On Thursday, Hayes will retire from the bench. In an earlier interview with Reuters, he declined to discuss the Johnson case. Asked whether he regrets any of the sentences he has handed out, he paused.

    “I think, maybe, I could have been more sympathetic at times,” Hayes said. “Sometimes you miss a few.”

    Additional reporting by Isabella Jibilian, Andrea Januta and Blake Morrison. Edited by Morrison.

    A watchdog accused, a pattern of rulings delayed, a repeat offender
    By JOHN SHIFFMAN
    Three recent cases illustrate how Alabama judges who were cited for wrongdoing were able to remain on the bench for years.

    Judge Chaney: Enforced, broke rules

    Court of the Judiciary finds Judge Chaney guilty of nepotism (AUDIO)
    What happened when a trial judge who also served on the state’s judicial oversight board was accused of misbehavior.

    Alex Chaney was just a year out of law school in 2015 when he started receiving lucrative appointments at taxpayer expense. A district judge began assigning him to represent people too poor to afford a lawyer.

    That judge was his dad, Kim Chaney.

    Judge Chaney is a powerful figure in rural Cullman County, where he was first elected to the bench in 1992. Chaney serves on a local bank board and has led several statewide justice associations.

    In 2012, the governor honored Chaney by selecting him to also serve on Alabama’s nine-member Judicial Inquiry Commission, which investigates misconduct by judges. While on the commission, Chaney broke its ethics laws in his own courtroom.

    In 2016, local attorney Tommy Drake filed a complaint against Chaney, alleging that the judge was appointing his son to represent indigent defendants, violating ethics rules that prohibit nepotism. Alex Chaney was paid $105,000 from 2015 to 2017 by the state for such court-appointed work, accounting records show.

    Because Judge Chaney served on the judicial commission, Drake sent his complaint to a different state watchdog agency, the Alabama Ethics Commission. On October 4, 2017, the Ethics Commission found that Judge Chaney violated ethics rules and referred the case to the state attorney general.

    The following day, records show, Judge Chaney resigned from the Judicial Inquiry Commission. But he remained a trial judge in Cullman. Eighteen months passed.

    Last summer, a Reuters reporter began asking state officials about the status of the case. The officials declined to comment.

    In November, Reuters sent Judge Chaney and his son queries. They did not respond. The judge’s lawyer, John Henig Jr, wrote to Reuters: “Judge Chaney is a person of remarkably good character and would never knowingly do anything unethical or wrong.”

    Henig said that Judge Chaney appointed his son from a rotating list of lawyers to represent indigent defendants. Henig called the appointments “ministerial” in nature.

    “If Judge Chaney’s son’s name was the next name on the list for appointments, Judge Chaney would call out his son’s name and thereafter immediately recuse himself from the case,” Henig wrote.

    A Reuters review of court records showed otherwise: Judge Chaney participated in several cases after appointing his son and issued substantive decisions. For example, records show that the judge reduced bond for one of his son’s clients, and approved another’s motion to plead guilty. Henig did not respond to questions about these records.

    APPOINTED SON: This document shows how Judge Kim Chaney appointed his lawyer son to handle cases.
    This February 7 – eight months after Reuters began inquiring about Chaney – the commission charged the judge with appointing his son to more than 200 cases and making rulings in some of them. Chaney struck a deal with the commission and retired from the bench, avoiding a trial.

    During a hearing to approve the deal, commission lawyer Elizabeth Bern said Chaney should have known better than to appoint his son, especially given that he did so while a member of the oversight agency. During Chaney’s tenure, the commission had disciplined two judges who abused their office to benefit a relative.

    “The nepotism provision is clear and unequivocal without exception,” she said.

    Chaney did not speak during the hearing.

    Drake, the lawyer who filed the complaint in 2016, said that absent the Reuters inquiries, he doubts Chaney would have retired from the bench because he is so politically powerful.

    Indeed, shortly after the judge stepped down in disgrace for steering work to his son, the local bar association issued a resolution praising him.

    Of Chaney, the local lawyers said, “He has always maintained the highest ethical and moral standards of the office and has been an example to all, what a judge should represent.”

    Judge Kelly: “Callous indifference”

    FAMILY MATTERS: Montgomery Circuit Court Judge Anita Kelly. Courtesy Montgomery Advertiser/Handout via REUTERS
    How a judge left children in limbo by repeatedly failing to perform her most basic duty: ruling on cases.

    Montgomery Circuit Court Judge Anita Kelly hears time-sensitive family matters such as child custody, adoption and divorce – cases in which a child remains in limbo until she rules.

    Starting in 2014, court and judicial commission records show, word of years-long delays in her cases began to emerge from foster parents, lawyers, social workers and appeals court judges. Commission officials are barred by law from discussing the case, but Reuters pieced together the scope of the investigation through juvenile court records, public documents and interviews with people involved.

    In May 2014, foster parents Cheri and Travis Norwood filed a complaint about Kelly with the judicial commission. They alleged the judge’s incompetence led to a traumatic, years-long delay in which a foster child who began living with the Norwoods as an infant was taken away from them at age 3 ½ and returned to live with her teenage biological mother.

    “If Judge Kelly thought they should have been together, fine,” Travis Norwood said in an interview. “Why didn’t this happen sooner? Because children can’t wait. You can’t freeze a child, hold her in suspended animation until her mother is ready.”

    Social workers who heard about the Norwood complaint forwarded their own concerns about Kelly’s conduct in several other cases. Nonetheless, the commission dismissed the Norwood complaint in early 2015, finding “no reasonable basis to charge the judge.”

    Over the next year, more red flags emerged. State appeals court judges raised concerns about Kelly’s “continued neglect of her duty,” citing at least five cases that had untenable delays. In November 2015, a supreme court justice criticized the nearly three years it took to determine one child’s fate.

    YOUTHFUL INNOCENCE: A handprint by a 3-year-old girl whose foster parents filed a judicial complaint against Circuit Court Judge Anita Kelly. The complaint alleged incompetence in a case that lingered for years. REUTERS/John Shiffman
    “I refuse to be another adult who has totally failed this child,” Justice Tommy Bryan wrote.

    Another 20 months passed before the judicial commission took action. In August 2017, it charged Kelly with delays that “manifest a callous indifference or lack of comprehension” to children’s well-being. One child’s case, it noted, had dragged on for five years.

    Kelly took her case to trial before the Court of the Judiciary, the special tribunal that weighs charges against judges. Her attorney argued that the judge worked hard and had shown no ill intent.

    In 2018, the tribunal found Kelly failed to “maintain professional competence.” Kelly was suspended for 90 days. Still, she kept her job. The court said it likely would have removed Kelly from the bench if not for two factors: Voters re-elected her in 2016, and she exhibited “good character and the lack of evidence of scandal or corruption on her part.”

    Her lawyer, Henry Lewis Gillis, applauded her reinstatement and said the delays never affected the quality of her decisions.

    “Judge Kelly cannot change yesterday,” Gillis said. “Rather, she chooses to learn from her past experiences as she continues to handle the many, many, many cases that come before her today.”

    Judge Wiggins: Give blood or go to jail

    FAMILIAR FACE: Alabama Circuit Judge Marvin Wiggins. Courtesy Selma Times-Journal/Handout via REUTERS
    A judge who is a repeat offender – four times over – remains on the bench.

    Circuit Judge Marvin Wiggins has been hit with misconduct charges by Alabama’s judicial conduct commission four times over the past decade. In 2009, he was reprimanded and suspended for 90 days for failing to recuse himself from a voter fraud investigation involving his relatives.

    “The public must be able to trust that our judges will dispense justice fairly and impartially,” the Court of the Judiciary concluded. “Judge Wiggins, by his actions, disregarded that trust.”

    In 2016 – in a case that made global headlines – Wiggins was censured for offering defendants the option of giving blood instead of going to jail for failing to pay fines. A local blood drive happened to be taking place at the courthouse that day.

    “If you do not have any money and you don’t want to go to jail, as an option to pay it, you can give blood today,” Wiggins told dozens of defendants, according to a recording. “Consider that as a discount rather than putting you in jail, if you do not have any money.”

    Forty-one defendants gave blood that day, and the commission called Wiggins’ conduct “reprehensible and inexcusable.” Wiggins acknowledged that his comments were inappropriate, but noted he did not send anyone to jail that day for failure to pay fines.

    ALERT US TO WRONGDOING

    Not all judges who have violated their oaths of office, broken the law or misbehaved on the bench have been brought before their states’ oversight commission. If you know of a judge who may have committed misconduct, please send us details at tips@thomsonreuters.com. Include the name of the judge, the state, details of what the judge may have done wrong, and a way for us to contact you. Reuters investigates such tips and will contact you before publishing.

    Wiggins’ lawyer, Joe Espy III, said that the judge “has always tried to cooperate” with authorities. Espy noted that Wiggins is a community leader, an ordained pastor and has been repeatedly re-elected to the bench for more than 20 years.

    “He is not only a good judge but a good person,” Espy said.

    Last year, Wiggins was reprimanded for directly calling the father in a custody dispute – a conversation that violated a rule prohibiting a judge from discussing a case without both sides present. A recording of the call became a key piece of evidence against Wiggins.

    In preparation for trial in that case, the commission said it found a “pattern and practice” of similar one-sided calls. The commission also said it found evidence that Wiggins was meeting with divorce litigants in his chambers without lawyers present.

    In November, this prompted a new commission case against Wiggins – his fourth in 10 years.

    “At a very minimum,” the commission alleged, his track record indicates a “pattern of carelessness or indifferent disregard or lack of respect for the high standards imposed on the judiciary.”

    But at a pretrial hearing in January, and in a subsequent order, Wiggins scored a victory before the Alabama tribunal that issues final judgment on such cases, the Court of the Judiciary. The presiding judge raised questions about whether proper procedures had been followed in the case against Wiggins.

    Three weeks later, the commission dropped the case. And Wiggins returned to the bench.

    Judges who were publicly disciplined – and what they did
    In the first comprehensive accounting of judicial misconduct nationally, Reuters identified and reviewed 1,509 cases from the last dozen years – 2008 through 2019 – in which state or local judges resigned, retired or were publicly disciplined following accusations of misconduct.

  426. Following the departure of:
    Detective Superintendent Gillian Wootton,
    Head of Specialist Operations,
    Thames Valley Police

    In 2020 Thames Valley Police disclose an internal police review carried out in 2016,
    the findings of which had been denied and special procedures put into place to
    prevent police officers from investigating!

    THAMES VALLEY POLICE
    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts 4564
    Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Reading

    While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife,
    they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven misdiagnosis that
    he is bipolar and hyper manic. BP Collins Solicitors then fail to notify the County Court that
    Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11order and is therefore is under the Court of Protection.

    Timothy De Meyer, Assistant Chief Constable Timothy De Meyer- Crime and Criminal Justice,
    Thames Valley Police will explain the special procedures put into place to prevent police
    officers from investigating!

    Leonard Lawrence
    26 January 2021

  427. Judges behaving badly !

    On this page we deal with those untouchables, the very people who are appointed to uphold justice – The judges and magistrates

    They demand our respect, but do they deserve it?

    Disgraced child abuse images judge walks free
    Former Crown Court judge David Selwood, of Winchester who admitted a string of child abuse images offences, has been given a 12 month rehabilitation order. He was charged after police found 75 images of naked and semi-naked boys aged between eight and 14 on his laptop computer.
    Magistrate, 55, invited young girl to have sex with him
    A MAGISTRATE in Gloucestershire left a 14-year-old girl frightened and shocked after he invited her to have sex in his car, a crown court heard. In the end the girl panicked and ran away from David Jones, 55, said prosecutor Jennifer Josephs. He was ordered to be under the supervision of the probation service for three years and to attend a community sex offenders programme
    Ex-JP jailed for sex abuse
    An ex-magistrate who over 36 years sexually abused five boys was yesterday jailed for eight years. Retired teacher Harold Tope (64) admitted a string of sex attacks on the boys who were aged as young as eight.
    Ex magistrate internet pervert is jailed for two years
    A former magistrate caught in a covert police operation set up to trap internet perverts has been jailed for two years. Ian Knight, who was also a schools inspector, lied about his age as he chatted to young girls, encouraged them to send him indecent photographs and engage in sexual activity over a webcam.
    Paedophile magistrate jailed for 4 yrs for abusing boys
    A FORMER Surrey magistrate and Boys’ Brigade leader who pretended to be a pillar of the community while abusing young boys has been jailed. Married David Lyn Jenkins, 70, now of Bevendean Crescent, Brighton, abused his positions of authority around the Redhill and Reigate area to get close to his young victims.
    Ex-JP spared jail over child abuse images
    A former magistrate who downloaded hundreds of child abuse pictures from the internet has been spared a jail sentence. Neil Morgan, 58, who was also awarded an MBE for his charity work, was given a 75-hour community punishment order
    Former Bath magistrate jailed for child abuse images offences
    A former Bath magistrate who exchanged indecent images of young boys over the internet has been jailed for ten months. Retired civil servant Andrew Hill sent hundreds of pictures of children, some as young as two years old, to other people he had met in online chat groups. And as well as sending the sickening images, the 61-year-old also took part in “grotesque” conversations outlining what he would like to do to the youngsters in the pictures
    Convicted paedophile JP jailed
    A magistrate from Croydon known as “The Zoo Man” who trawled the internet for images of children being sexually abused was today jailed for nine months. Zoologist Terry Mills, 58, spent his days visiting primary schools showing children exotic reptiles and his evenings building up a library of child pornography.
    JP jailed over child abuse cases
    A magistrate who abused three teenage boys has been jailed for three years. Gerald Sidney, of Lockleaze, Bristol, abused the youngsters he met through his role as a Sea Cadets officer. He was found guilty after a jury heard he had indecently assaulted one boy under the age of 16 and two older males between 1980 and 1997
    Former councillor/Magistrate jailed for sex abuse
    Alan Prescott, 62, who was described at the Old Bailey as a “pillar of his local community”, was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting indecently assaulting four boys in his care between 1970 and 1980 while he was superintendent of a Tower Hamlets children’s home.
    Ex-JP’s child abuse images shame
    A FORMER magistrate has been jailed for six months for downloading indecent/abusive images of children from the internet. Frederick Keith Stott, 48, admitted making indecent pictures on a computer which he kept locked in his garden shed.
    A former Midland magistrate who sexually abused two young children has been jailed for 18 months at Birmingham Crown Court.
    David Garwood (65), of Highcliffe Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, who admitted four charges of indecent assault, was also told he would be put on the sex offenders register for ten years.
    Ex-magistrate is jailed over abusive images of children
    A magistrate has gone to prison for downloading child abuse images. Geoffrey Botley admitted 12 offences of making indecent photos between October 2001 and December 2004. The 52-year-old was jailed at North Avon Magistrates’ Court for six months and ordered to register as a sex offender for seven years.
    Bristol church pastor admits sexually abusing boy, 14
    James Hennah, aged 39, was also a magistrate before being suspended when the allegations came to light in October. He admitted two offences of sexually touching a child and one of voyeurism
    Ex-magistrate admits filming naked children
    A former Cumbrian magistrate Geoffrey Crookes with a history of sex offences against children was caught secretly filming naked youngsters on the shores of Windermere.
    Magistrate who met the Queen guilty of killing two-year-old scalded under a power shower
    Rashpal Chana, 49, was sentenced to four-and-a-half years while the child’s mother, Eva, received six years for manslaughter for the same crime. A jury was told Kristiana suffered 10 per cent burns from water that may have been as hot as 58c. The burns were left untreated for so long her damaged skin died and began to decay. Kristiana died shortly after she was admitted to hospital, ten to 14 days after the scalding occurred
    Magistrate jailed for indecent images of children
    A former business partner of England rugby player Rory Underwood has been jailed for possessing indecent pictures of children. Martyn Helliwell, 49, was found guilty of 16 counts of making and distributing the images. The former naval officer and magistrate was also placed on the sex offenders register and given a sexual offences prevention order
    Judge cautioned for sex act in public toilets
    A Welsh judge cautioned by police for alleged gross indecency has been severely reprimanded by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine. In a letter to district judge Richard Hoffman, the Lord Chancellor warned him any repetition would be likely to lead to his dismissal. Judge Hoffman was arrested with another man in public toilets
    Magistrate jailed for indecently assaulting boys
    Magistrate Basil Eliston was jailed for five years by St. Albans Crown Court charged with nine offences of indecently assaulting boys. Eliston was also Headmaster of a North London School. It was heard that he often persuaded boys to play fantasy games involving nude canings, bondage and ice cold baths. It was stated that he hoped ‘gift’ payments to the boys would ensure secrecy, and it was said he paid over £300 for this. He was tailed by Police and finally caught with one 15yr-old boy in his car at Whippendale Woods, Watford. Police raided his home and found pornographic magazines of boys along with a school cane and various ropes for bondage.
    Judge shamed in ‘rentboy’ allegations bids to work as barrister
    Circuit Judge Gerald Price QC is being investigated after he let his male escort Christopher Williams 25 sit on the bench and have access to three courts as ‘ a law student’. The 60 year-old Judge a father of two is accused of exposing his office to possible blackmail threats and bringing the court into disrepute. His nine month affair with the rent boy was discovered by officials who doubted the presence of the so called law student. The Judge normally attended Swansea Crown Court.
    ‘ The drive & drive judge ‘
    Chief circuit Judge Victor Hall was given a serious warning from the Lord Chancellor after the £91,000 a year Judge was caught drink/driving by police when they stopped his car in Leicester. Magistrates fined him £1,000 and disqualified him from driving. He was jeered at by people outside the court as he left, and is said to have offered to retire, but was suspended on full pay instead. He later kept his job as a judge !
    ‘ JUDGE SWINDLES THE ELDERLY OUT OF £85,000 ‘
    JUDGE RICHARD GREEN was jailed for three years at Lewes Crown Court after it was known that while he was a solicitor, he took £85,000 from clients’ investment funds. He did this while he was a partner in the Law Firm of Barwell’s in Seaford. The thefts committed were on elderly people around 80 to 90, he had complete control over their money, and spent it on cars, luxury holidays and a yacht.
    ‘ JUDGE RUNS AWAY FROM SCENE OF ACCIDENT ‘
    JUDGE VISCOUNT COLVILLE landed into trouble when he collided into two cars in Belgravia. It was heard that the Judge – also a circuit Judge in Maidstone, Kent — went into the back of a diplomat’s car which in turn hit a taxi. The Taxi driver said ‘ he knew full well heid been in an accident with both of us, but ran off down the road with me chasing him. I took the registration number of his vehicle and gave it to the police. When interviewed by the police, the Judge claimed he had not hit either car but scraped a bollard. He appeared before Horseferry Road Court and was fined £500 and given five penalty points on his driving licence.
    ‘ SENIOR JUDGE RESIGNS OVER MISCONDUCT AT TRIAL ‘
    JUDGE FRANK CHAPMAN, presiding over a trial in the Birmingham Crown Court passed on information during the hearing to the Prosecutor Barrister Simon Davis that could help the failing prosecution case which was already costing the public purse more than £50,000. The message was on his voice mail, and as a result the trial was aborted. The Judge’s forty year legal career collapsed in an instant and he quickly made the decision to retire instead of face complaints lodged.
    ‘NO CAR TAX JUDGE IS NOT CHARGED ‘
    The Somerset Police stopped a vehicle in Bristol while on a ‘ crackdown on illegal cars and road tax dodgers’ and found it belonged to a Judge. Detective Sergeant Bond said ‘ you wouldn’t expect a Judge to check the licence disc would you? not on his Daimler.’ After the stop check, they gave the Judge a police escort??
    ‘ DRINK-DRIVE JUDGE RESIGNS AFTER SECOND OFFENCE ‘
    JUDGE BRUCE MACMILLAN who presided over cases in the Liverpool Crown Court was arrested after being stopped twice by traffic cops in the same month. He was observed driving erratically on the M6 by the motorway patrol. He was first stopped in 2008 in August and then for a second time on September the 30th 2009 and was awaiting a court hearing concerning drink driving. The Judge decided to resign rather than be ordered to stand down.
    ‘ JUDGE DISREGARDS LAW ‘
    JUDGE HUMFREY MALINS was caught parking his car in a ‘disabled drivers only’ bay 50 yards away from the court in Isleworth. The Tory Judge who presides at the Crown Court actually said he parked in the bay rather a lot . Lorna Reith of Disability Alliance commented ‘ it is digraceful that this judge can flout the law in taking space reserved for someone disabled.’
    ‘ DRINK/DRIVE JUDGE JAILED AFTER CRASH ‘
    DISTRICT JUDGE ANGUS MACARTHUR was jailed for 28 days and banned from driving for ten years. It was the third drink/driving offence of this judge, past offences resulted in being drunk in charge of a car when he was fined £300, and another offence when he was fined £3000 and banned from driving for two years. Macarthur was a judge in Nottingham, Northampton and Leicester. At the time of this offence he was a circuit judge for Peterborough. Besides jail he was fined £2,000 and had to pay £100 costs. The case was heard at Peterborough Magistrates Court.
    ‘ CROWN COURT JUDGE HAS JAIL TERM CUT OVER DRINKING OFFENCE ‘
    JUDGE JOHN REEDER of Essex had his jail sentence of five months cut to two months on appeal it was stated. The judge who was five times over the drink/drive limit was put into solitary confinement for his own safety it is said. He crashed his Range Rover into another car and caused injury to the occupants.
    ‘ DRINK/DRIVE DEPUTY JUDGE IS BANNED FROM DRIVING ‘
    JUDGE MICHAEL PARKER was fined £400 and disqualified from driving for twelve months by London Magistrates. He was twice the legal limit when he was stopped by officers who arrested him at the scene.
    ‘ JUDGE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACCUSATIONS ‘
    A COURT USHER RECEIVED COMPENSATION OF £15,000 after claiming she had been sexually harassed by JUDGE ANURA COORAY. Judge Cooray was accused of asking Maxine Coombes to show him her breasts and give him a rub down. The judge retired on the grounds of ill health.
    ‘ SMUGGLING JUDGE IS DISMISSED ‘
    THE ONLY JUDGE TO BE SACKED UNTIL 2009 WAS JUDGE BRUCE CAMPBELL. The judge admitted to charges of smuggling whisky and cigarettes into Britain.
    ‘ DRINK/DRIVE JUDGE DEMOLISHES A WALL ‘
    COUNTY COURT JUDGE LINDA LAZONBY was caught for the second time over drink/driving after her car smashed into a wall after a drinking session. Police said she was over three times the legal limit when they breathalysed her. She walked away from the court with two years probation, banned from driving but no fine was imposed?
    ‘ JUDGE BANNED FOR 3 YEARS ‘
    DISTRICT JUDGE DAVID MESSENGER was banned from practising law for three years when it was found that the Scarborough Judge misused client money improperly at his law firm Messengers. It was given in evidence that he used the money for his own purposes after financial irregularities were found by investigators. He was also found guilty of being intoxicated too, he was ordered to pay £15,000 costs.
    ‘ JUDGE APPEARS BEFORE COURT FOR INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOUR ‘
    JUDGE MICHAEL WOOD has stood down after a female legal advisor accused the District Judge who presides in County Durham, of unacceptable sexual behaviour towards her.
    ‘ BOY FOUND IN MAGISTRATE’S HOTEL ROOM ‘
    PHILIP HOWARTH J.P. and Public Schoolmaster, was arrested in a hotel room in Thailand whilst on holiday. Police were raiding places where they knew ‘sex tourists’ went. The Wolverhampton Magistrates J.P. denied having sex with the boy. He appeared before a court in Choburi charged with procuring a 14 year-old boy for sex and having indecent photos.
    ‘ BENEFIT CHEAT MAGISTRATE IS JAILED ‘
    J.P. JOHN MEIGHAN was jailed for fifteen months after being found guilty of defrauding the Benefits Agency of £45,000 over a period of five years. He was convicted in Exeter Crown Court and pleaded guilty to making false claims while he was a sitting magistrate. Judge Graham Cottle said ‘ You knew what you were doing was dishonest and chose to disregard your position as a serving magistrate on the bench.’
    ‘ MAGISTRATE ALTERED CAR TO AVOID SPEEDING FINE ‘
    MICHAEL RODGER J.P. consulted an internet site that told him how to avoid a charge by altering the vehicle’s appearance. In a bid to save his wife from a fine, he went to extraordinary lengths to change the Skoda and told colleagues the car had been cloned by another person using a similar car. It all failed however, when the police recognised his wife and children. The fine would have been £60 and three points, but it all ended up with him and his wife being charged with perverting the course of justice. They were sentenced to 300 hours of community service and costs of £5,000. The Judge said they were lucky not being given a custodial sentence.
    ‘ ROAD RAGE MAGISTRATE LANDS IN COURT ‘
    MAGISTRATE THOMAS ROGERS a Gloucester J.P. and Director of Bath College, flew into a rage when his car almost collided with a car belonging to Julie Richards. Rogers stopped his car in the middle of the carriageway blocking Julie Richards and got out and stood shouting at her. She took down the number of his sports car and police followed it up. Cheltenham Magistrates found him guilty of using threatening behaviour and fined him £500 with £120 costs.
    ‘MAGISTRATE FACES JAIL OVER SEX ATTACK ON BOYS ‘
    PORTSMOUTH MAGISTRATE HAROLD TOPE faced jail for a string of sex assaults on boys going over many years from 1960. At the Crown Court he pleaded guilty to 11 indecent assaults, three charges of serious sexual assaults on young boys. Altogether he pleaded guilty to 16 charges involving five boys.
    ‘ MAGISTRATE STEALS £664,000 FROM PENSION FUND ‘
    SUREYA SADIQ J.P. took £664,000 in a pension fund scam after inventing eighteen retired workers. For nearly two years she was able to sign most of the pension cheques herself. The bogus names were supposed to have joined the council — therefore entitled to a lump sum and regular payments. She was a magistrate with the London’s South Western Magistrates Court. Judge Peter fingret said she was in gross breach of trust and sentenced her to 2 years in prison.
    ‘ DANGEROUS DRIVING MAGISTRATE FINED ‘
    PHYLLIS WINN-JONES J.P. found herself in the dock after driving the wrong way in traffic by driving into traffic on the wrong side of a dual carriageway. She forced two cars to swerve off the road in fear of their lives. She was stopped and charged with careless driving at Cardiff Crown Court. She was fined £550 and disqualified from driving for six months.
    ‘ PORN MAGISTRATE RESIGNS ‘
    WEST MIDLANDS MAGISTRATE DAVID WARD resigned from his post at the Sutton Coldfield Magistrates Court after a videotape showing DIY porn fell into the hands of a child. Police were called when after Ward videoed children on an outing he gave it to one of the parents little realising he’d forgotten to change tapes.
    ‘ MAGISTRATE IN CREDIT CARD FRAUD ‘
    JP. ANTHONY HARLEY of Grays in Essex was ordered to do 80 hours of community work and repay £850 he fraudulently obtained by using someone else’s credit card. The bench required Mr. Harley to tender his immediate resignation. He was sacked from his job with Ford Motors where the offence was committed.
    ‘ MAGISTRATE SHAMED BY ILLEGAL EVICTION TACTICS ‘
    MAGISTRATE STEPHANIE LIPPIATT, a JP for twenty years appeared before Croydon Crown Court on charges of criminal damage and illegal eviction. She and friend, Victor Hawes smashed up furniture belonging to tenant, Maria Percec and threw it into the street. The J.P. who owns eight properties in the South London area was fined £2,000 for the illegal eviction and £250 for criminal damage. She was ordered to pay costs and she was suspended from her duties on the bench at Kingston Magistrates Court.
    ‘ Magistrate who spanks boys resigns from bench ‘
    Magistrate Charles Guttman resigned after it was discovered he posted adverts offering discipline to students. The JP who once held a position at Dulwich College Preparatory School in South London often sat while juvenile cases were being heard. Guttman offered academic training, and preferred boys to be in shorts and vest. They were put through P.E. had cold showers and given the slipper or cane throughout the evening or afternoon. Boys booked in and went to his flat for lessons in Belsize Park near Hampstead, London.
    Judge sacked for being ‘rude and petulant’
    District Judge Margaret Short was removed for behaviour that was “inappropriate, petulant and rude” with regards to one incident, according to the Office for Judicial Complaints, and “intemperate and ill-judged with regard to another”. A statement from the OJS read: “Her removal follows a history of complaints about her misconduct in court, primarily about the way in which she behaved towards solicitors appearing before her, but including a variety of other inappropriate behaviour.”
    Magistrate judge sacked for falling asleep in court
    A magistrate judge who fell asleep during a trial last year has been relieved of his position following an investigation by the Office for Judicial Complaints. The trial of a 17-year-old youth accused of assault, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had to be abandoned after the defendant’s mother noticed John Harrison dozing at the bench. ‘I was not asleep but I rested my eyes for five minutes or so,’ Mr Harrison said. ‘It was just a normal reaction in the middle of the afternoon. The court was warm — the heating was on and the sun was pouring in through the window. ‘I was still listening to the defence solicitor speaking to the defendant and I was able to take down some notes related to what was said. But an investigation found otherwise. It said Mr Harrison, who had been a magistrate since 1997, “risked bringing the magistracy into disrepute”.
    Judge Beatrice Bolton could face sacking
    A leading judge at the centre of a dangerous dog neighbour dispute was last night under investigation by senior Government figures. The Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor are considering the future of Judge Beatrice Bolton after she was convicted of failing to control her German Shepherd and fined £2,500. Judge Bolton, of Rothbury, Northumberland, swore and stormed out of court after a District Judge returned the guilty verdict
    Judge resigns after losing appeal over prostitute investigation
    A senior judge, who was suspended after an investigation was launched into his private life, resigned today.The Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) inquiry into Judge Gerald Price QC was launched following allegations made in the News of the World about his conduct with a male prostitute.The inquiry recommended the judge be sacked but Price resigned after a failed appeal and before the disciplinary process was formally concluded.
    Drink drive charge judge resigns
    A Crown Court judge charged with drink driving resigned today after being arrested for the second time. His Honour Bruce Macmillan, 63, was held in Toxteth, Liverpool, on Thursday last week for allegedly being drunk in charge of a motor vehicle.
    Judge quits after causing collapse of rape trial by phoning prosecution barrister to pass on advice
    A senior judge has resigned after causing the collapse of a rape trial he was presiding over by phoning the prosecution barrister to pass on advice. judge Frank Chapman, the Recorder of Birmingham, advised barrister Simon Davis to seek a medical witness to help prove his case. Mr Davis notified the 50-year-old defendant’s barrister and it is understood both lawyers approached the judge about his conduct. Judge Chapman admitted his mistake before swiftly falling on his sword, bringing a 40-year legal career to an ignominious end.
    A Baptist church minister was jailed for eight years for sexually abusing two boys in the United States.
    He had previously admitted four counts of sexually molesting the two young sons of family friends over a period of several years.
    He sexually abused the boys between 1995 and 1999, from the ages of seven and eight. A former magistrate in the county, Dando was understood to have been a member of the Oxfordshire Family Panel, which deals with child care and access proceedings

  428. 16 April 2012
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court
    HHJ Oliver: Well, it actually says so in the Official Solicitor’s guide, does it not?
    Barrister: It does
    HHJ Oliver: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”
    Barrister: Yes

  429. Court of Protection Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:42
    Subject: RE: Leonard Lawrence
    Dear Mr Lawrence,
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.
    Kind regards,
    James Batley
    Court of Protection,
    Royal Courts of Justice

  430. Disclosure of His Honour Judge Simon Oliver’s private papers and judicial papers.
    Disclosed late 2014
    (President of the Family Division private office informed)
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    11 February 2013 15:21
    Email HHJ Oliver to HMCTS I will need to make an order retransferring it to Court of Appeal

  431. Good morning Leonard, I don’t remember the judge in my divorce but I remember my ex wife’s solicitor was called Evans from a law firm of the same name in Farnborough. At the time I was warned by a court usher that I had been marked as “a payer” and he told me that my best course of action was to limit the damage to myself by “not paying too much”. As you know, the problem is not one judge. The whole system is corrupt.

    It is very early in the morning here and I cant write more at this time.

    Richard

    I have been ill for a long time now and there is no help, only abuse from those whose duty it is to provide justice.

  432. 1 February 2021,

    Located the letter dated 9/9/2010 from Richard Anelay QC, Deputy High Court Judge,

    Admission by Barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk, to Richard Anelay QC that I had
    been a patient subject to the Court of Protection when he (barrister Dominic Brazil) placed
    Hundreds of Thousands of Pounds in cost and adverse inferences on me.

    Mr. Brazil blames the judiciary for allowing him to asset strip me!

    Richard Anelay QC letter was last known to have been with His Honour Judge Simon Oliver,
    Reading County Court, on or before the 16 April 2012.
    The letter then mysteriously disappeared!
    It never reached either the Court of Protection or the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Leonard Lawrence Pilot

    cc
    Provincial Grand Master RW Bro Anthony Howlett Bolton OBE.
    Berkshire Masters Lodge No. 3684
    Berkshire Masonic Centre,
    Mole Road,
    Sindlesham,
    Wokingham
    RG41 5EA,
    United Kingdom

  433. Customer Review Dark Waters (DVD) [2020]

    Leonard Lawrence Pilot

    5.0 out of 5 stars Leonard Lawrence Toxic Aircraft Cabin Air
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 29 January 2021
    Verified Purchase
    Dark Waters (DVD) [2020]

    BRILLIANT DVD

    This mirrors my, and other aircrew, including cabin crew and passengers journey with
    Toxic Aircraft Cabin Air

    Google: Toxic Aircraft Cabin Air

    Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study), Basel, Switzerland
    Dr. Graham C. Holt
    Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 11 (216-220):
    “At this point the tenor of the presentation changed dramatically from calm, logic science
    to the harrowing story of one pilot, Len Lawrence…. His story was one of costly legal battles
    to prove that his brain injury was due to chemical exposure and that he was not mentally
    unfit. What emerged was a story of incompetence by the medical profession, who lacked
    knowledge of the symptoms following exposure to neurotoxins and the unfairness of the
    legal profession in not allowing him to see data concerning his own personal records in
    their reluctance to tackle those culpable.”

  434. Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, London.
    Batey, James
    Tue 17/07/2012 11:59
    HHJ Simon Oliver does not hold a Court of Protection nomination.
    Kind regards

    James Batey
    Court of Protection, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 4LL
    DX 44450 Strand
    Tel: 0300-456-4600

  435. Mr. Justice Hayden
    Vice President, Court of Protection,
    London, United Kingdom​

    Mr. Justice Hayden

    I have today posted by special delivery (Ref JS767.57…G) a hard copy of the letter dated
    9 September 2010 from Richard Anelay QC to your Clerk Debra.

    The letter dated 9 September 2010 from Richard Anelay QC, former Head of Chambers,
    1 Kings Bench Walk, and Deputy High Court Family Judge 1 King’s Bench Walk, Temple,
    London, EC4Y 7DB includes the folowing sentence:

    Quote
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that you were a
    patient subject to the Court of Protection”

    19 January 2009. Court of Protection to Mr. Lawrence
    The following judges at Slough County Court have not and currently do not hold a nomination
    of the Court of Protection:
    DJ Fortgang
    DJ Jones
    DJ Devlin
    DJ McCulloch (Good judge)
    Please also be advised that to date the Court of Protection has received no application from
    any person or body.

    Mr. Richard Anelay’s letter was last with His Honour Judge, Simon Oliver, Reading County
    Court, on or before 16 April 2012
    Thereafter:
    Mr. Richard Anelay’s letter then mysteriously disappeared.
    Mr. Richard Anelay’s letter, along with six Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, never
    reached the Court of Protection or the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Yours respectfully

    Leonard Lawrence

  437. Leonard

    I to had a very bad experience with two so-called freemasons in my first ever lodge.
    They bullied me out of the lodge but I had already become a member of two other
    lodges at that time.

    It was those other lodges that supported me through this tough time. I have always
    believed in freemasonry. There is nothing wrong with freemasonry but there is
    something wrong with some freemasons. Some have forgotten why they have become
    freemasons and the sacred oaths they made.

    Some want to sit with elaborate aprons and medals so they can look down on others,
    this is on a minute % probably 2-3% at most, but they can do damage to good hard
    working masons.

    Fortunately for me I had support and gave all of my documentation in which proved
    I was being bullied. I have since gone on to enjoy freemasonry to its fullest and am
    a campaigner for the welfare of new freemasons.

  438. District Judge John Fortgang died not long after he made his dishonest judgment!

  439. Lenny
    So, we got two scumbag judges without Court of Protection authorizations,
    a somewhat forgetful barrister and an assortment of bent court administrators
    all working against you. What a shit-show the COP institution really is.
    Bent as a nine bob note.

  440. The Honourable Mr. Justice Hayden
    Vice President, Court of Protection,
    London,
    United Kingdom

    In 2010 I received a letter dated 9 September 2010 from Richard Anelay QC
    Head of Chambers, 1 Kings Bench Walk, Temple, London, EC4Y 7DB.

    Mr Anelay wrote:
    “Mr Brazil assures me that District Judge Fortgang was completely aware that
    you were a patient subject to the Court of Protection” Like HHJ Simon Oliver,
    District Judge Fortgang did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Richard Anelay QC letter was last with Worshipful Brother His Honour Judge,
    Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, on or before 16 April 2012.

    Thereafter:
    Mr. Richard Anelay’s letter then mysteriously disappeared.
    Mr. Richard Anelay’s letter, along with six Court of Protection, Medical Certificates,
    never reached the Court of Protection or the Civil Court of Appeal.

    HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation until 7 October 2015.

    Having located Richard Anelay QC letter on the 4 February 2021 I posted by special
    delivery Richard Anelay QC letter to the Clerk to Mr Justice Hayden. Mr Anelay QC
    letter, with the admission by barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers,
    that I had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection has now reached the Royal
    Courts of Justice after 10 years!!!!

    Yours respectfully,

    Leonard Lawrence
    Royal Navy veteran

    Tracking no. JS76.65.54.GB

    Your item was delivered on 05-02-2021.

    Service used:

    Royal Mail Special Delivery Guaranteed 1pm™

    Not the signature you expected? Find out why.

    Signed for by: DEABY

    Delivered: 10:33am

  441. Please contact me , i have some solid evidence against this man.[jamescan1969@outlook.com] –where he committed perjury at court of appeal..

  442. The Honourable Mr Justice Hayden
    Vice President, Court of Protection,
    London,
    United Kingdom

    Mr. Justice Hayden,
    It is 8 years today since Mrs Justice Pauffley directed His Honour Judge Simon Oliver
    to retransfer my case to the Civil Court of Appeal.

    Lawyers believed that they had destroyed all of my case files.

    Chronology
    1 August 2005
    Email: Solicitor James Beck, Senior Lawyer at the office of the Official Solicitor to the
    Supreme Court to solicitor Helen Mary Clift
    RE: Leonard LAWRENCE Ref: LNF41919/ DATE 1 August 2005
    Just to advise you on the current situation.
    Obviously, the sale cannot proceed until we have Court of Protection authority,

  445. Leonard Lawrence Pilot
    5.0 out of 5 stars “Always tell the truth”.
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 28 January 2021
    Verified Purchase
    Air Chief Marshal, thank you!

    Worshipful Brother Simon “Always tell the truth”

    I had the opportunity to talk to not one, but three Air Chief Marshals, an Air Marshal,
    Generals and other senior military officers about what had occured to me, and how I
    became homeless on the streets of Buckinghamshire whilst a patient subject to the
    Court of Protection. The military officers did not support your view! Neither did the
    visitors that later called on me wanting to inspect the Court of Protection, Medical
    Certificates CP3’s and CP2’s that had been used to hold. Matthews v Matthews!!!!
    Leonard Lawrence

    Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard John GCB KCVO CBE FRAES
    BOLTS FROM THE BLUE

    Page 312.
    Fourthly, I think it was at Cranwell that I began to understand something about
    integrity which to me is all about having the moral courage and determination
    to tell the truth, and the honesty to be truthful in judgement of oneself.

    I make no claim to the moral high ground. It was simply that I discovered that
    lying to keep out of trouble was more bother than it was worth. Somehow you
    always got found out and long before I discovered golf was not my sporting
    cup of tea I read somewhere: “Always tell the truth.

    You may make a hole in one when you are all alone on the golf course”. So I
    came to understand that telling the truth not only saved an awful lot of hassle,
    it also earned one grudging respect no matter the seriousness of one’s
    misdemeanours.

    In the year 2000 and perhaps more so today, wherein traditional valves of
    well-proven and lasting merit are at best challenged and at worse belittled,
    honesty and integrity have their own dignity. And in my judgement they are
    both to be admired and valued as being beyond compare.

    END

  446. Following the departure of:
    Detective Superintendent Gillian (Gill) Wootton
    The now former Head of Specialist Operations and Covert Policing
    Thames Valley Police

    In 2020 Thames Valley Police disclose an internal police review carried out in 2016,
    the findings of which had been denied and special procedures put into place to
    prevent police officers from investigating!

    THAMES VALLEY POLICE
    Det Insp Nicholas Watts 4564
    CID Reading, Berks.

    While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting
    for his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven
    misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hyper manic. BP Collins Solicitors then fail to
    notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is
    therefore is under the Court of Protection.

    Assistant Chief Constable Timothy De Meyer- Crime and Criminal Justice,
    Thames Valley Police will explain the special procedures put into place to
    prevent police officers from investigating!

    Leonard Lawrence
    ——————————————————————————————————————————
    Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver this mirrors the Matthew v Matthews case !!
    The mother that had to leave the United Kingdom with her children and lose her
    home because of the actions of my Worshipful Brother Simon Oliver. Ms Matthews
    is not the only mother, who with their children, had to leave the United Kingdom.

    My Worshipful Brother Simon will not leave these mothers alone, he pursues them
    and their children. The Passport Office is instructed not to renew their and their
    childrens passports, unless they return to my Worshipful Brother Simon Oiver’s
    Secret Court Room!!

    My Worshipful Brother Simon, you have divided Freemasons, Police Officers, The
    Judicary, Lawyers, DWP, Revenue and Customs, and even some of the High Court
    Family Division.

    Their is a patten. Like myself, these mothers and others that appear before you
    find themselves subject to investigations from the the DWP, Revenue and Customs
    and Thames Valley Police. Even barristers that appear before you on their behalf
    are not exempt. ,

    My Worshipful Brother Simon why would some Berkshire Freemasons visit me.
    I have no association with Berkshire Freemasonary. The £10,000 Simpson Millar
    LLP Solicitors told me to pay following the hearing before you on the 16 April 2012.

    Lets arrange payment. I will contact Mr Richard Anelay QC and others accordingly.

    Leonard Lawrence

  447. THE TELEGRAPH
    By Gabriella Swerling, Social Affairs Editor 13 March 2020 • 2:43pm

    MR JUSTICE HOLMAN
    COMDEMS ‘ABOMINATION’ THE SECRECY SURROUNDING FAMILY COURTS (England)

  450. The Soham Scapegoats – A Gross Miscarriage of Justice

    Home Geopolitics The Soham Scapegoats – A Gross Miscarriage of Justice
    Geopolitics
    The Soham Scapegoats – A Gross Miscarriage of Justice
    By John
    26th July 2017
    IHMC

    When British police arrested Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr (above) during the early hours of Saturday 17 August 2002, on suspicion of the abduction and murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, they did so in the certain knowledge that absolutely no hard evidence existed to incriminate either suspect. The reason for the rapid arrests was very simple; just hours earlier, two small bodies had been found near the perimeter fence at USAF Lakenheath, and the British Government headed by PM, Tony Blair, was terrified of a massive political scandal involving American servicemen based in, or transiting through, the United Kingdom. Why would that be? Bear with me and all will be revealed.

    Shortly after the arrests, British and American media organisations demonised Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr so successfully that public attention was diverted away from Lakenheath completely, and focused instead on the young couple from Soham who had earlier willingly spoken to television crews about their concerns for the wellbeing of the two missing 10-year-old girls. Both knew the girls reasonably well. Ian Huntley was the caretaker at their school, and Maxine Carr was a former teaching assistant in their class.

    Millions of viewers around the world watched Ian and Maxine being interviewed by the media, and most were impressed by the openness of their statements and their genuine willingness to help if possible. Experts in non-verbal communication also confirmed that Ian and Maxine’s involuntary body and eye movements perfectly matched what they were saying verbally, to the journalists.

    In other words, both appeared to be telling the truth both verbally and non-verbally, an almost impossible feat for even a trained liar to fabricate. It is critical to note here also that both came across on television as perfectly normal, sane individuals, a reality later to be inexplicably challenged by police and psychiatrists in Cambridgeshire.

    If Huntley and Carr had been involved at all with the abduction and murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, would they have then been stupid enough to run the gauntlet of about 10,000 American servicemen en-route, and dump the two small bodies in a location clearly visible from Lakenheath Control Tower, taxi track, and main runway? A serviceman with detailed knowledge of activities and procedures inside the base might get away with it unseen, but certainly not two civilians. So the perimeter would be an ideal dumping ground for American servicemen eager to return to ‘safe’ territory at USAF Lakenheath, before either entering their barracks on the base, or catching a shuttle bus to USAF Mildenhall.

    In an attempt to demonise Ian Huntley still further, police ‘leaked’ the damning information that he had been arrested for rape a number of years earlier. Well, yes, sort-of. Whilst still a teenager himself, Huntley had consensual sex with his girlfriend, who was only 15-years-old at the time, an offence in the United Kingdom known as statutory rape. He was never charged with an offence however, and his former girlfriend confirmed it was a mutual attraction, with enthusiastic sexual consent on both sides.

    So for a while at least, the government, police and media managed to deflect attention away from the two massive nearby USAF bases at Lakenheath and Mildenhall, and the political minefield lurking just below the surface if the British public ever found out about the very large numbers of children abused, raped, and sometimes murdered by American servicemen on overseas duty. So let us now consider the ‘American connection,’ before returning shortly to the relentless ongoing psychological abuse of Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr.

    The simple fact that Holly and Jessica’s bodies were found at the USAF Lakenheath perimeter fence, should have had British police knocking on Lakenheath’s front door immediately. Unfortunately, any such action would have seriously undermined Tony Blair’s personal slavish dedication to George W Bush’s ‘War on (of) Terror’ and seriously jeopardised any public support for the upcoming, illegal invasion of Iraq in March 2003 (which of course at that time was unknown to the general public.)

    Even though earlier in the investigation police declared they would be interviewing 700 known sex offenders of British nationality, there was no mention of interviewing the 10,000+ US servicemen based in close proximity to Soham Village, many of whom were also serious, serial sex offenders, or also determining which other American servicemen had transited through the two bases, and on which flights, since Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman first disappeared.

    Obviously not all members of the American military are criminals, but amongst the small number who do fall into that group, more than a few are actually psychopathic savages. It is a matter of public record that many American servicemen have habitually carried out sickening attacks against civilians whilst on overseas duty, happy in the knowledge that the serious assault or murder of women or girls around the world, carries a lesser penalty than at home.

    One such case is that of Staff Sergeant Frank Ronghi, who on 24 August 2000 pleaded guilty to sodomising and killing an 11-year-old Kosovar girl in January the same year. A member of his platoon testified that Ronghi disdainfully claimed, “It’s easy to get away with this shit in a third-world country.”

    The ‘shit’ that Ronghi referred to is described here by the US Army Pathologist for Europe. “Her right jaw was fractured, practically bisected,” said Lieutenant Colonel Kathleen Ingwersen, “We found evidence of sperm and semen in her vagina, mouth and rectum,” she testified to a hushed hearing. “There was trauma to the neck muscles, the trachea and the carotid artery,” Colonel Ingwersen said, adding she had found evidence of “blunt trauma” as the child was apparently beaten, choked and forced to kneel, face to the ground, as she was sodomised.

    But in a perverse way Ronghi was proven right about the overall American perception of the ‘lesser worth’ of women and children, in what he and others continually refer to as ‘the third world.’ At his trial he was sentenced to life imprisonment, despite the fact that an identical offence against an American girl in the USA, would have resulted in his execution in many States.

    It would be impossible to list here all such vile attacks against local girls by American servicemen overseas because there have been far too many. However, in order to educate the British police (who mercifully are rarely exposed to similar atrocities in Cambridgeshire and Suffolk) it seems prudent to mention a handful, thereby demonstrating that Ronghi is far from being an isolated case.

    In 1955, an American soldier was sentenced to death for the murder of a six-year-old girl in occupied Japan, a sentence that was later commuted to life imprisonment. During 1966 a US soldier confessed to strangling a young waitress. Then in 1972, several US soldiers were sentenced to life imprisonment for strangling local women. Later In 1975, a US soldier was sent to prison for raping two high school students. Local police also arrested two US soldiers during 1985, caught in the act of raping a woman.

    During a spate of crimes in 1995, a US soldier was arrested for the brutal murder of a young woman, with a hammer, two children were killed by a drunken soldier, and three US soldiers brutally raped a young schoolgirl. In January 2000 a US sailor was sentenced for sexually assaulting a 16-year-old Japanese girl. Remember this is only a small part of the overall list, nor does it include the many more alleged perpetrators who Japanese and other authorities claim were ‘spirited out of the country and back to the USA’ before they could be apprehended and charged.

    The last point to consider before returning to the plight of Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr, is the strange fate of four wives at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, the former home base of Staff Sergeant Ronghi. All four wives were allegedly killed by their Sergeant husbands when they returned from active duty in Afghanistan, during the same week that Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman went missing. US Army authorities attempted to establish whether or not an anti-malarial drug all were taking contributed to the murders, but the results were ‘inconclusive.’ This drug is acknowledged to have psychotic side-effects, and yet nevertheless is still routinely prescribed to US servicemen.

    There were no direct flights out of Afghanistan to the USA at the time, meaning that all American servicemen including those seriously affected by the drug, and also affected by PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) were obliged to change aircraft either in Germany or in England, usually at USAF Lakenheath or Mildenhall. No attempt has ever been made to accurately establish how many of these servicemen transited through USAF Mildenhall and USAF Lakenheath during the week that Holly and Jessica vanished. Maybe there should have been? But of course that was not a priority for the British government who to the contrary, wished to deflect blame anywhere but the US armed forces.

    USAF

    Initially on Saturday, 17 August, Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr were arrested ‘on suspicion’ of being involved in the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. Each was taken to a different police station in Cambridgeshire for interrogation, which is standard police procedure. However, this is also the point at which standard police procedure was completely disregarded. Obviously Ian and Maxine were determined to protest their innocence, and refused to provide police with a convenient ‘confession,’ no matter how tired they were, and no matter how much extreme pressure was applied by the intimidating tactics of the police. There was also a distinct absence of defence lawyers arguing the suspects’ versions of events.

    In an extraordinary move, police then applied to a closed court, for an extension of Huntley and Carr’s detention, although the reasons were not made public. There was actually no need for police to provide a reason, because it was blatantly obvious they still had absolutely nothing to connect the two suspects with the two murders. If at that stage, police had any hard evidence linking Huntley or Carr to the murders, or had managed to coerce a confession out of either, they would have been charged immediately.

    Then on Tuesday 20 August, just twenty-four hours before the legally extended detention was due to expire at 6.19 am on Wednesday, a large team of psychiatrists appeared on the scene as if by magic, and deemed that Ian Huntley was unfit to appear in court. He was then duly ‘sectioned’ under the Mental Health Act 1983 and remanded to Rampton high-security psychiatric hospital, at Retford in Nottinghamshire, without being charged with any offence. How convenient.

    Now think about this carefully… When Ian Huntley appeared on international television he was entirely coherent and unquestionably sane. But apparently, after a mere three days in police custody, he suddenly became insane. How? Did the police deprive him of sleep and induce a nervous breakdown, or were the all-too-convenient government psychiatrists a pack of liars? You choose.

    One thing is certain. There was a gross violation of Ian Huntley’s legal and human rights and absolutely nothing was said or done about it on his behalf. Ask yourself, is it even legal to section a man under arrest in England under the Mental Health Act before he is charged with a crime? In fact, when asked this precise question, Dr. Harris of Rampton Psychiatric Hospital was evasive, replying, “It is not unheard of, but it is very unusual.” In other words, ‘no’.

    Once inside the terrifying Rampton, a Victorian hulk originally founded as an asylum in 1912 under the Criminal Lunatic Act of 1860, police charged Ian Huntley with murder. He was now at the mercy of a five-man psychiatric team who assessed his ‘symptoms’ night and day over the next month, and shot him full of God-knows-what medication. These are the tactics of the Soviet Gulags. Stalin would no doubt have wholeheartedly approved.

    It would have been no surprise if, after a full month at the hands of these pseudo-scientists in Rampton, that Ian Huntley had chosen to confess to almost anything, including the murder of JFK and the Princess of Wales. Stalin’s enemies frequently confessed in the Gulags, but only after being deprived of sleep for days on end and pumped-full of Reserpine by the ‘psychs.’

    But the next problem for the police was Maxine Carr. Clearly no-one would believe that two people had suddenly gone completely insane in police custody at the same time, so senior officers in Cambridgeshire and at the Home Office had to think of something a little more creative. They knew Huntley and Carr were both were innocent of course, but somehow Maxine had to be brought under control. In other words, she had to be so badly frightened that she would be positively eager to ‘co-operate’ with police when the drugged, perhaps electro-shocked and certainly docile Ian Huntley was finally paraded in the courts.

    So police formally charged Maxine Carr with ‘attempting to pervert the course of justice,’ ie. lying to police, whether she had or not, and quietly arranged to have her incarcerated in the most brutal and terrifying of Britain’s women’s prisons, at Holloway in London. ‘Attempting to pervert justice’ is not a violent crime requiring a high security establishment of course, and there were certainly prisons closer to Soham, but only Holloway would have the desired devastating effect on Maxine, hopefully bringing her under immediate control.

    Although the Victorian-built Holloway was replaced in a phased rebuilding programme between 1975 and 1985, it has managed to retain its brutal reputation. In 1995 Sir David Ramsbotham, then inspector of prisons, walked out in disgust at the conditions he found inside. He noted that 75% of women at the jail were suffering from some form of identifiable mental disorder, while one in 10 was suicidal. Almost half were drug addicts in need of immediate detoxification, while more than half had serious alcohol problems and nearly 95% were on sleeping pills.

    Naturally enough, on its own this would be quite enough to send a small-town country girl like Maxine insane in weeks, but the British authorities wanted to make absolutely sure. So before she left for London, police arranged a court hearing for her in the local town of Peterborough, and made sure the media and ‘rent-a-mob’ people knew about its exact timing well in advance.

    As the police van approached the court, the commotion directed at the innocent woman not yet convicted of any offence at all, began. Unseen hands banged on the metal van, and several females led an ugly chorus, jeering and shouting at a woman they could not see – a thick grey blanket had been placed over Maxine Carr’s head – for a double murder with which she had not even been charged. “Evil bitch”, screamed one. “Sick cow,” spat another. In the melee, another woman and her two daughters unfurled a home-made banner. “Rot in hell forever”, it said, which is of course, a wonderful example to give to two impressionable, ‘innocent’ young children in how to behave towards others.

    Mob

    ‘Rent-a-mob’ out in force outside Peterborough Crown Court

    Trial by media had well and truly begun, and the trembling Maxine Carr had not yet even reached that special part of hell called Holloway. But a week or two in there with the deranged and the junkies would quickly have her co-operating with anything and everything the Cambridgeshire Police Service (not to mention the establishment) wanted.

    But is that really the point here? The Chief Constable and all of his officers at Cambridgeshire Constabulary should be mortally ashamed of their blatant abuse of police powers, abuse of the judicial process, and abuse of the Mental Health Act. In turn it goes almost without saying that we the public should not have believed a word of any subsequent ‘confession’ that Maxine Carr was coerced into making, either during or after her terrifying ordeal at Holloway.

    Nor should we necessarily believe that the relatively tiny Cambridgeshire Constabulary had the overall power to pull off these impressive stunts without some very heavy political assistance. Think about it carefully. The original players in a tight little Cambridgeshire county investigation had now been scattered to the four winds. Ian Huntley was 100 miles away to the north in Rampton, Nottinghamshire, and Maxine Carr was 100 miles away to the south in Holloway, London. The bodies of the girls were actually found in Suffolk, directly involving a third force, the Suffolk Constabulary. And police investigators from the Norfolk Constabulary also did quite a lot of the leg work on this case.

    So the Cambridgeshire ‘Holly and Jessica Case,’ was no longer really the Cambridgeshire Holly and Jessica case at all. The only people who knew exactly what was going on in London, Nottinghamshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire were the small group of powerful manipulators who set the scene. This is the same small group who had sufficient power to arrange special closed courts, send an army of highly briefed ‘shrinks’ to Cambridgeshire, subvert the Mental Health Act, and personally arrange the twin hells of Rampton and Holloway for the two suspects, Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr. Believe me, only very senior bureaucrats at the Home Office in London have sufficient power and influence to arrange all of this. ie. ministerial level bureaucrats.

    There is a final point to consider about the case itself. A newspaper report stated “The bodies of murdered 10-year-old girls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were discovered in a severely decomposed and partially skeletonised state, and the pair were almost certainly not killed where they were discovered, a coroner’s inquest was told yesterday. Their remains were found last Saturday in woodlands outside a United States air base at Lakenheath, Suffolk.” Even now, the cause or place of death could not be established, and yet the Coroner had released the bodies to the parents for burial.

    The reason for the importance of this statement was obvious to residents in the Lakenheath area, whose local newspapers saturated them for weeks with the information that Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr once lived in a house owned by relatives less than a half-mile away from where the bodies were found. So this information allowing police to ‘point the finger’ at the pair, had long been in the public domain, and was of enormous value to anyone wishing to deflect attention away from the real killers. Adding real substance to this claim is the fact that the path beside which the bodies were located is well-used by walkers, but the bodies were not ‘found’ until the very morning of Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr’s arrests.

    Now ask yourself what you would do if you were Ian Huntley and had really been involved in the murder of the two little girls. Would you deliberately move their bodies close to a residence in which you had lived in some years before, thereby implicitly pointing the finger of guilt at yourself, or would you move the bodies well away from any such residence? You choose. Although even a certified insane person in Rampton should be able to select the correct answer to this elementary question.

    Taking the opposite view, what would you do if you were a deranged American serviceman who managed to smuggle the two little girls inside USAF Lakenheath, and then murdered them at some remote location inside the very large airfield boundary, with its multitude of convenient empty buildings? Would you leave the bodies where they lay until the smell of putrefaction attracted the attention of the Military Police at the base, or would you toss the pathetic remains over the perimeter fence one dark night, as close as possible to the former Huntley residence you learned about in the local Suffolk newspaper, and then tip-off police? Once again, you choose.

    No matter what you choose and no matter what you think, it would probably have made no difference to the final outcome. The atmosphere surrounding the case was so heavily laden with political fog that you could cut it with a knife. At the national level, Blair and his pathetic cronies could not afford to rock the boat because of the ‘special relationship’ with the US, and all this entailed for his personal prestige and the manufactured ‘War on (of) Terror.’

    Even at the local level they could not make waves either because, as the local Chamber of Commerce will eagerly explain, those thousands of very nice American servicemen at USAF Lakenheath and USAF Mildenhall spent millions of pounds each year with local businesses in Suffolk, Norfolk and Cambridgeshire. You know, those good people at the Chamber of Commerce, Masons, Rotarians, Buffalos and the rest, being entertained for free at the Lakenheath Officer’s Mess, with their USAF ‘pals.’

    After more than a year of stalling, the trial of Huntley and Carr commenced on 5 November 2003, in Court Number One at the famous ‘Old Bailey’ in London. The location itself is the first indication that this trial was of special political significance, because most British murder suspects are tried by perfectly competent Crown Courts scattered far and wide across the land, including the counties of Norfolk and Suffolk. Without direct political pressure from the British Home Office in London, the two suspects would unquestionably have been tried in a local Crown Court.
    The logic behind the selection of the Old Bailey for this trial lies partly in its fearsome reputation over the years, at least since the present building was opened by King Edward VII in 1907. Some of the more notorious trials held at the Old Bailey include Doctor Crippen, the Yorkshire Ripper and the Kray Twins of ‘East End gangster’ infamy. In the absence of any evidence against Huntley and Carr, the Home Office intended to use this fearsome Old Bailey reputation to artificially bolster its case.

    This is certainly not in the spirit of a motto above the Old Bailey door that reads, ‘˜Defend the Children of the Poor and Punish The Wrongdoer,’ but the Home Office cares little about such niceties in this new age of synthetic terrorism. Entirely in accord with the spirit of the illegal American concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay, the Home Office was about to reverse the motto to ‘Protect the Wrongdoer and Punish the Children of the Poor.’ Was it ever any different? However, let us now analyse the frightening number of blatant legal deceptions by the Prosecution in Court Number One…

    On 5 November 2003, Crown Prosecutor Richard Latham QC, set the tone for the entire trial when he told the jury, “We understand from those representing Huntley it is unlikely to be disputed by Huntley that the girls went into his home shortly after 6.30pm that evening, that Huntley was the only other person there at the time and that they died within a short time of going inside his home. It was Huntley who took their bodies to the place where they were found.”

    The defence did not confirm this claim, and Huntley was not even in court to hear it, but the ‘fix’ was already in with a vengeance. Over the two weeks that followed, this unsubstantiated claim by Latham would become the prosecution catechism, constantly repeated on television and printed in full by at least two different newspapers every day, until the British public had been saturated with Huntley’s alleged ‘confession. But it was not a confession at all, it was just a monstrous legal trick designed to bring the media deceivers ‘on side,’ and brainwash the British public.

    “The prosecution case is that these two girls fell into the hands of Huntley shortly after leaving home. For some reason known only to him he chose to murder them both. We allege that he went on to remove the bodies from Soham. Latham then went on to say that for this reason the focus of the trial is likely to centre on whether or not, “…it could be construed that the deaths while he [Huntley] was there with them in his house amounted to murder.”
    This was another devastating ‘smoke and mirrors’ legal conjuring trick, because one of the most obvious deficiencies in the bogus prosecution case against Huntley was the total absence of any forensic evidence linking Holly Wells or Jessica Chapman to the inside of Ian Huntley’s house or to Huntley himself. Latham knew this of course, so took a neat short cut, for the written court record, by simplistically stating that they were. The fawning cheerleaders of the complicit media lapped this up, and broadcast the lie far and wide.

    Does anyone believe for a single moment that an inexperienced school caretaker (janitor) could simultaneously subdue two violently struggling 10-year-old girls, kill them one after the other in his own home without a sound, then remove every trace of their DNA to the point where police forensic experts could find none at all? This is an absolute fantasy, because British police forensic experts are known worldwide for their skills. If two girls had been attacked, let alone killed in Huntley’s house, police would have found hundreds of microscopic DNA traces. Alas, (for them) they found none. However they were not about to let this mere detail stand in the way of their perversion of justice.

    Latham was ready for a little scepticism, so the next morning, 6 November 2003 he said that a female detective who had visited Huntley’s house noted that the ground floor was tidy, and that there was a “strong smell of a lemony cleaning product”. She also found it “strange” that there was washing on the line when it was raining. Though Latham was obviously using this statement to subtly back up his claim that Holly and Jessica were inside Huntley’s house the night before, we still need to examine the female detective’s statement more closely.

    Since when has it been a crime to keep your house tidy, use lemon-scented cleaning fluid, and forget you had washing on the line when it was raining? If these events are really cause for suspicion, then all the housewives in Britain should also be investigated for murder. Furthermore, there will likely be a huge queue of criminals wanting to purchase this incredible “lemony cleaning product”, which by implication is allegedly capable of removing all traces of DNA from a major crime scene in less than twelve hours.

    According to Richard Latham QC, Ian Huntley also made a “major attempt” to sanitise his car in the days after the disappearance of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, actions which Latham claim show a man “who is thinking calmly and carefully and is calculating his way forward”. These uncorroborated claims include removing an existing boot carpet, changing tyres, and cleaning the Ford Fiesta while others were out searching for the girls, presumably after casually dumping the two small bodies at USAF Lakenheath.

    Once again we are left wondering which of these actions (if true) constitutes an illegal or even suspicious act. Specifically where the boot carpet is concerned, Latham explained that when Huntley bought the car it had a professionally fitted carpet, which had been changed for another piece of domestic carpet by the time police seized the car. It is a little known fact that Huntley owned a large Alsatian dog, which is more than capable of destroying a fitted car carpet completely in a matter of days.
    Ian Huntley bought his car in July 2001, and my best guess, which by the way is every bit as valid as Latham’s, is that the Fiesta’s fitted carpet would have needed to be replaced by August 2001 at the very latest, i.e. a full year before Holly and Jessica vanished.

    Potentially more damning but equally misleading, was Latham’s claim that on Monday 5 August 2003, the day after Holly and Jessica vanished, four new tyres were fitted to a red Ford Fiesta at a garage in Ely. The registration was different to Huntley’s car but Mr Latham suggested, “The man who turned up asked for a different registration number to be put on the paperwork and slipped £10 to the mechanic in order for that to be achieved.”

    Not according to the mechanic in question, who said on the telephone that no such statement was ever made, and no man of Huntley’s description had ever visited the garage. “I’ve seen him on TV dozens of times”, the mechanic said, “I would remember if he had ever been here for a tyre change.” Indeed he would, so more ‘smoke and mirrors’ from Richard Latham QC, no doubt designed to deflect attention away from the most interesting and damning aspect of Ian Huntley’s red Ford Fiesta.

    So, what about DNA from Holly Wells or Jessica Chapman, inside the Ford Fiesta? Remember that Ian Huntley stood accused of throwing both bodies inside the car, then driving sixteen miles across country on rough bumpy roads, before allegedly dumping the small bodies in a drainage ditch close to the perimeter fence at USAF Lakenheath.

    Short of taking a car to pieces and immersing each individual component in an acid bath, there is no known way of removing all traces of human DNA. Microscopic particles vanish into more than a hundred hidden nooks and crannies, and sit there waiting to be found by diligent police forensic experts. So how many DNA traces of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman did police find inside Ian Huntley’s red Ford Fiesta? None. Not one, meaning that just like Ian Huntley’s house in Soham, the two girls were never inside the vehicle at any time.
    In order to try and cover this critical deficiency the prosecution then claimed that traces of chalk and concrete particles used as a surface on the track at Lakenheath had been found on the bottom of Huntley’s car, and pollen grains found inside the vehicle that matched the area. It was a nice try, but pointless and grossly misleading. Because the total lack of human DNA from either girl proved they had never been transported in Huntley’s car, then where or when it had been driven, and what might or might not be stuck to the underside of the vehicle, is completely irrelevant, legally speaking and should in any fair trial have been laughed out of court.

    The biggest ‘smoke and mirrors’ prosecution conjuring trick of week one, was unquestionably that of the bright-red Manchester United shirts worn by the two girls the day they vanished. If you key ‘Holly Jessica’ into Google, most of the first page contains photographs of the girls wearing these famous shirts, and there is a natural tendency to believe that Holly and Jessica’s shirts are unique in some way. Nothing could be further from the truth. Tens of thousands of identical Manchester United shirts were produced by the same mill from identical red fibres, to the point where they could have been purchased by anyone with minimum effort. Identical shirts were available anonymously on the Internet for £29.99.

    It is also alleged by the prosecution that the Manchester United shirts ‘worn by the girls were cut from their bodies and burned in a bin at Soham Village College’ where Huntley worked, where they were finally and very conveniently discovered by police on 16 August 2002, although Huntley was not present. Richard Latham QC said that hairs from Huntley’s head had been found mixed in with the clothing in the bin, as were his fingerprints, and his fingerprints were also found inside the bag. “We say the clothing was in the bottom of the bin, and after the clothing was there the bin liner had been put in it and spread and his fingerprints are on the spreading process, as it were, of the bin liner.”
    This initially sounds like fatal evidence against Huntley, until you realise that despite his fingerprints and hair being found on the inside of a waste bag, which is perfectly normal for a caretaker responsible for ALL waste bags at the college, police forensic experts did not recover any of Holly Wells or Jessica Chapman’s DNA from these red shirts, which turned up in the nick of time, so to speak. The lack of the girl’s DNA on the shirts proves these were not the shirts Holly and Jessica were wearing when they vanished, but merely deceptive substitutes. In other words, a person or persons unknown ‘planted’ the shirts, and also planted loose fibres from the same substitute shirts in Ian Huntley’s house.

    In light of this, and were it not so serious, the prosecution’s claim about the red fibres in Huntley’s house would be laughable. Latham claimed that 15 fibres were found on a yellow shirt discovered in the main bedroom, three on a pair of beige trousers, again in the bedroom, and one on a grey fleece also in the bedroom. An extraordinary situation, when you think about it carefully. We know that police found no trace of Holly Wells or Jessica Chapman’s DNA anywhere in the house, and we know that none was found on the two red substitute shirts, so what was Huntley actually guilty of?

    Seemingly, Huntley is guilty of going about his business lawfully at the college, shedding a few hairs and fingerprints as he went, which then mysteriously found their way into close proximity with two Manchester United shirts and fibres from those shirts, which the total lack of DNA proved conclusively were never worn by either girl.

    Next, before we join the jury on a visit to USAF Lakenheath at the beginning of week two, let us close the book on the Soham crime scene, by examining witness WPC Anna Burton, who actually appeared in court much later on 14 November. WPC Burton was a police dog handler who attended Soham Village during Sunday evening to assist in searching for the missing girls. Her trained tracker dog had Holly Wells’ scent, and for a while the pair searched around the village without any success. Then just after midnight, WPC Burton bumped into Ian Huntley near Soham College.

    “It was wonderful to run into the caretaker because he would know the layout of the place and he had offered to help look around.” I just thanked him and said I was very grateful for his help, particularly because of the fact it was so late” WPC Burton told how she was able to ask Huntley about buildings having alarms, and they spent an hour going round the site together, only going inside buildings if they were unlocked, meaning Holly and Jessica could have got inside.

    WPC Burton asked him what the purpose of the ‘hangar’ building was, the location where the court heard that the charred remnants of the girls’ clothes were later found hidden in a bin, and was told it was a Groundsman’s building. She asked if he had the keys and was told he did not. WPC Burton let her dog sniff round the outside of the building, but said it drew no reaction.

    The seminal clue here is not that WPC Burton’s trained police dog failed to react to the hangar building where the substitute red shirts would later be planted, but the fact that the dog completely failed to react to Ian Huntley himself. Remember that the dog was following Holly Wells’ scent, and then came into very close proximity to the man who stood accused of attacking and murdering Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman just a few hours earlier, and is then alleged to have travelled in a car with their corpses all the way to Lakenheath. Believe me, if Huntley had been anywhere near Holly Wells at any time during the evening, WPC Burton’s trained dog would have picked it up in seconds. So let me repeat that one more time, the highly-trained police tracker dog failed to react in close proximity to Ian Huntley, hours after he allegedly killed Holly.

    In summary then, the Soham crime scene has proved absolutely no connection between Ian Huntley, and either Holly Wells or Jessica Chapman. The prosecution claimed both girls were inside Huntley’s house, but the total lack of DNA proves they were not. The prosecution claimed both girls were inside Huntley’s car, but again the total lack of DNA proves they were not. A highly trained police tracker dog following Holly Wells’ scent on the night of the incident, does not react at all when placed in close proximity to the alleged murderer. At this stage, and despite the nonsense being peddled in the Old Bailey by the prosecution, Huntley had no case to answer at all.

    Maybe a seriously pertinent question at this juncture should be, what was Huntley’s defence thinking when all this easily refutable nonsense was presented to the court? No attempt whatsoever was made to counter all these points and the prosecution was allowed to blunder on totally unhindered, making point after incriminating point, slowly sealing Huntley (and Carr’s) fates.

    Media

    The text on the photograph above shows the level of concern that we all should feel about this trial. Juries travel to crime scenes in buses on a regular basis, but never in the presence of more than one hundred police officers. So who did the Home Office believe was about to attack these ‘twelve good men and true’ of the Jury? Basque Separatists perhaps, or maybe even the Taliban? The whole thing was nothing more than a distasteful Home Office stunt, designed to get the maximum amount of media publicity.

    Actually, we need not bother with the brief Soham part of the visit, because we already know there is nothing there of interest, other than a few scraps of red fibre from substituted Manchester United shirts. So let us bypass Soham, and re-join the Jury as its members visit the crime scene close to the perimeter fence at USAF Lakenheath:

    “We suggest that Ian Huntley knew this area really well,” Latham said, “whoever it was who dumped the bodies would not have set off down this track in the dark unless they knew where they were going and what they would find. Whoever dumped the bodies knew it would be a suitable place to hide them and they would be unlikely to be caught in the act. It was an ideal place and he [Huntley] was thinking when he set off from Soham that evening, thinking quite clearly and calmly, not in a panic trying to get rid of those bodies as quickly as possible.”

    In the annals of British legal history, it is unlikely that any other Queens Counsel has shot himself through the foot quite so severely with a single, long-winded statement like this. Latham’s words are the exact opposite of reality where Huntley was concerned, and this press release dated March 2002 and authorised by Lieutenant Chris Watt of USAF Lakenheath, proves why.

    “Nearly 60 closed circuit television cameras went operational here the first week of March. Placed in all areas around RAF Lakenheath and RAF Feltwell, the anti-terrorism force protection cameras give the 48th Security Forces Squadron increased ability to deal with force protection issues and add another layer of security and safety to the base.

    No one man can cover several positions at once,” said Master Sgt. Jim Kendall, 48th SFS police services NCOIC. “The new system augments the forces that we already have in place. Operated by handpicked, trained security forces 24 hours a day, AT/FP CCTV allows security forces to monitor more than forty camera views at once. In fact,” said Kendall, “the system has already been used to reduce the time it takes to apprehend drivers that run the gates. We can follow gate-runners with the cameras and record their actions until our forces catch up with them. Recording a gate-runner’s actions also helps us monitor a suspect for anti-terrorism and force protection activities. RAF Lakenheath is the first base in US Air Forces in Europe to install an AT/FP CCTV system.” he said.

    What the press release does not mention is that on the same date, USAF Lakenheath personnel mounted additional armed patrols inside and outside the perimeter wire, 24 hours per day, every day including Sundays and public holidays. Remember that the 60 anti-terrorist cameras were switched on, and the extra patrols started, a full five months before Ian Huntley was accused of dumping Holly and Jessica’s bodies into a water-filled drainage ditch, itself within easy range of Lakenheath’s ‘always-on’ infra-red-capable day and night video cameras.

    It actually gets worse than this, far worse. If you look at detailed maps and photographs of the airfield carefully, it is obvious that the ‘crime scene’ is very close to one end of the active runway, and thus constitutes a suitable firing point for a shoulder-launched ‘terrorist’ surface to air missile. The USAF pays special attention to such areas, with cameras available at all times for their detailed surveillance, with video footage archived for later examination of possible suspects.

    So Latham’s claim that, “whoever dumped the bodies knew it would be a suitable place to hide them and they would be unlikely to be caught in the act” is absolutely correct, provided that the culprit knew the precise layout of the anti-terrorist security cameras, their exact fields of view, and the precise timing of the armed patrols around the Lakenheath perimeter. Because the camera fields of view were adjusted on a daily basis, and the timing of the patrols altered constantly for security reasons, the only culprits capable of dumping the bodies in the drainage ditch without getting caught, would be an American serviceman (or men) inside USAF Lakenheath, and not just anyone. Whoever it was had access to the anti-terrorist operations schedules, indicating a very high security clearance.

    I wonder if the Home Office will ever be prepared to tell the British public why it failed to take action in this regard, and instead decided to deliberately psychologically abuse and frame a man and a woman known to be innocent of any crime? I will not be holding my breath.

    The BBC Conspired to Pervert The Course of Justice
    At 6.18 pm on 24 November, the Government-controlled BBC issued a sweeping statement that appeared to seal the fate of Ian Huntley, prime suspect in the Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman double murder case. Under the dramatic headline ‘Huntley Admits Cutting Up Clothes,’ the BBC used its huge media presence and perceived public credibility to claim:
    “Ian Huntley has admitted cutting off the clothes of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman as their bodies lay in a ditch. His lawyer told the Old Bailey that Mr Huntley took the clothes back to the Soham school where he worked as a caretaker, and set them on fire. Stephen Coward QC [for Huntley] said his client put the burnt clothes in the bin inside a hangar, where they were later found. The court has already heard that Mr Huntley accepts the 10-year-old girls died at his home.”

    When the BBC printed and broadcast this scandalous statement at 6.18 pm, they already knew it was a complete lie, and have thus placed themselves and their parent corporation completely outside the law. At the very least, those BBC personnel directly responsible for this blatant deception must be charged with ‘conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.’

    Ian Huntley had made no such admission about planting clothes anywhere at any time, and, as the BBC also knew very well, had never on any occasion ‘accepted’ that the two girls ‘died at his home.’ Earlier in the day Stephen Coward QC had merely outlined what he deduced the prosecution was trying to claim in respect of his client Huntley and the clothes in Soham College, and made the quizzical nature of his questions very plain by stating in open court “That is at least a possibility, is it not?”

    There is no excuse for the BBC here, because the media and journalists have access to the online court transcripts about once every 15 minutes in real time, and a ‘mistake’ is therefore impossible. The BBC was desperately trying to please someone very high up in the British establishment with its criminal lies and deception, and was certainly not acting alone in these obscene endeavours.

    Almost identical lies were peddled on the same day by Reuters, by the Independent newspaper, by the Scotsman, and by a host of lesser newspapers and magazines stretching all the way from Canada to Australia. Every editor and producer had access to the same transcripts emanating from the same courtroom every fifteen minutes, meaning that every editor and producer knew that he or she was printing and broadcasting outright lies, designed to secure a fraudulent and wrongful conviction for the Crown.

    If there was ever a chance for the prosecution to successfully frame Ian Huntley, it was on this day, and in the few days following, using the generic Manchester United shirts so conveniently ‘found’ by police in the hangar building at Soham College, but without a single trace of Holly Wells’ or Jessica Chapman’s DNA on them, or indeed the fingerprints of Ian Huntley, a fact openly admitted by Crown Forensic Scientist Doctor Helen Davey.

    Unfortunately for Ian Huntley, this was also the day when the prosecution suffered a severe attack of amnesia about known critical events directly relating to the period of the search conducted in the immediate vicinity of Soham College, and the hangar in which the generic red Manchester United shirts were eventually located.

    Reading the court transcripts carefully, it creates the strong impression that the hangar at Soham College was the private domain of Ian Huntley, an illusion reinforced by claims that Cambridgeshire police only investigated the hangar after finding the keys in Ian Huntley’s house, after he was arrested. This is absolute nonsense, proven by direct quotes from same mainstream media who have incarcerated Ian Huntley, probably forever, on behalf of and at the behest of powerful figures within the British establishment.

    Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman went missing on 4 August 2002, with the generic red Manchester United shirts subsequently located either on 16 or 17 August, depending on which report you prefer to believe. In turn this means that the shirts remained hidden inside the hangar for 12 or 13 days, a period during which we were led to believe that only Ian Huntley had access to the hangar.

    Oh really? Try this from the Daily Mail of 6 August 2002: “Scores of American servicemen from nearby Mildenhall airbase joined in the search of Soham and its college grounds.”

    And this from the Times of London dated 7 August 2002: “On Monday, hundreds of local people and American servicemen from the United States Air Force bases at nearby Mildenhall and Lakenheath also took part in the hunt. One staff sergeant from Florida, who gave his name only as Eric, said he felt so closely connected with the local community after spending part of his childhood in the Fens when his father was an airman, that he went straight to Soham.”

    This mighty shock wave of military muscle went through Soham College like the grim reaper, including the exclusive ‘hangar’ outbuilding and its contents, but found nothing at all. From this search we therefore know that the red generic Manchester United shirts were not there a full 48 hours after Huntley is alleged to have returned from the burial site, and tried to ‘set fire to them in a bin.’

    Nor does the problem end there. The additional nightmare is that the very people who should have been investigated for the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, ie. American servicemen based at USAF Mildenhall and Lakenheath, had direct unfettered access to what the prosecution nowadays refer to in hushed terms as a ‘scene of crime’ in the Soham College hangar. The hangar is not a valid crime scene at all, having been contaminated after the event by hundreds of unknown people.

    The list of people who could have later stuffed those generic Manchester United shirts into a waste bag [obviously] bearing caretaker Huntley’s fingerprints is virtually endless, and certainly includes a range of suspects not merely limited to servicemen at Mildenhall and Lakenheath.

    As the Daily Express reported on 13 August 2002, “Cambridgeshire police are now being assisted [in the search] by 16 other forces as well as the Ministry of Defence and the RAF.” And this from the Western Daily Press dated 14 August 2002, “More than 320 officers from 16 different forces, plus British Transport Police as well as RAF and Ministry of Defence personnel, are involved in the hunt.”

    At no time before 16 August 2002 was Soham College or its hangar placed off limits to any of these search personnel, and Soham locals advised searchers visited the College and surrounding area many times, certainly until the bodies were eventually located in the drainage ditch alongside the perimeter wire at USAF Lakenheath.

    If we all just sit by now that the British Government, the BBC and the rest of the establishment have convicted Ian Huntley for the gratification of a very sick elite and their even sicker ongoing agenda, then we must all share joint responsibility for his fate, and the fate of others that will surely follow in his footsteps if the paedophiles in high places are allowed to get away with this forever.

    Let’s collectively make sure that they don’t.

    With grateful thanks and acknowledgements to the late, Joe Vialls and his estate

  451. Covid-19 confirmed at 95 courts in less than a month

    By Monidipa Fouzder1 March 2021

    HM Courts & Tribunals Service received reports of confirmed Covid-19 cases among staff, judges, jurors and court users based at 95 court sites in less than a month, according to latest figures released by the Ministry of Justice.

    Labour’s Alex Cunningham, shadow minister for courts and sentencing, asked the department how many coronavirus cases were confirmed from 26 January to the most recent day.

    Figures published by courts minister Chris Philp last week show that, between 26 January and 19 February, HMCTS received reports of confirmed cases for 82 staff, 16 judges, 13 jurors and 53 court users across 95 court locations.

    Staff at 48 courts tested positive for Covid-19, including five staff members at Bromley County and Family Court. Judges at 14 courts, jurors at 12 courts and court users at 40 courts also had the coronavirus.

    Philp said: ‘Due to the time taken for individuals to take a test, receive test results, and then communicate this to HMCTS (which is then recorded against the date initially reported) further cases may be added after the time of publishing. The table only includes court locations within the HMCTS estate where we have learnt about a new positive case within the dates given above. All other court sites have not reported any new cases between these dates. There should be no assumption that a positive case indicates that there has been transmission within a court building.’

    Covid testing site sign

    MoJ: positive case does not indicate virus was transmitted within court

    Source: Alamy

    Philp said the positive test rates were falling in line with national numbers and the incident rate among staff was trending around the national average.

    Cunningham told the Gazette: ‘It is vital that the justice system remains open, but it is not fair to ask legal practitioners and court users to pay the price for this government’s incompetence by putting their health and safety at risk.

    ‘The government must rapidly increase the provision of Nightingale courts, begin the immediate rollout of testing in courts, and temporarily reduce the size of juries. There is no more time for pilots and tinkering at the edges – these changes must be made now so that justice can be done.’

    Earlier this year it emerged that nearly 600 cases of Covid-19 were confirmed among court users between 24 November and 11 January.

    In its latest operational update, HMCTS said jurors must now wear fluid resistant surgical masks, provided by the court, in smaller deliberations rooms that operate with 1m distancing plus other safety mitigations. To keep footfall down, court users who need support are encouraged to bring only one person with them, such as a friend or family member. A Nightingale court opening at Birmingham Maple House this week will provide four additional courtrooms for crown, civil and family work. A temporary court is also being opened at London’s Barbican, providing two courtrooms for Crown court work.

    HMCTS also began piloting lateral flow testing at London’s Southwark Crown Court last month, weeks after it was introduced at Manchester Civil Justice Centre.

    https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/covid-19-confirmed-at-95-courts-in-less-than-a-month/5107610.article

  454. I think we should send them an email and ask them why they are not investigating the contents of this website and prosecuting Simon Oliver. But rather, doing everything they can to help protect him. I have heard stories about doors being kicked in and electronic devices been taken away by Thames Valley Police so that they can analyse and assess who has been writing on this website so they can prosecute the victims but not the perpetrator because the perpetrator is a judge who has a good relationship with them. I wonder how many of these police officers are also taking bribes in court

  455. SIMON OLIVER WILL BE DISAPPOINTED THEN

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/more-white-people-arrested-over-terrorism-than-any-other-ethnic-group-for-third-year-in-a-row/ar-BB1eecx3?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBoPWjQ

    More white people arrested over terrorism than any other ethnic group for third year in a row

    The number of white terror suspects being arrested in Britain has outstripped those of Asian appearance for the third year in a row.

    Official figures show that 89 white people were arrested on suspicion of terror offences in 2020, compared with 63 Asian suspects, 15 black suspects and 18 of other ethnicities.

    “The proportion of white people arrested exceeded the proportion of Asian people arrested for the third consecutive year,” a Home Office document siad.

    “Arrests of persons of white ethnic appearance accounted for 48 per cent of arrests, up seven percentage points on the previous year. Those of Asian ethnic appearance accounted for 34 per cent of terrorist-related arrests, down five percentage points.”

    Of those arrested, 81 per cent considered themselves to be of British or British dual nationality, the highest proportion on record.

    But the overall number of terror arrests dropped by a third to 185, the lowest figure in nine years.

    “The reductions were most evident in arrests under non-terrorism legislation and may reflect the general reduction in crime during this period when there were public health restrictions in place,” the Home Office said.

    Police operations against far-right terrorists have increased since 2017, following the banning of National Action.

    The government went on to proscribe several aliases and other neo-Nazi groups, most recently banning Feuerkrieg Division in July.

    The head of UK counter-terror policing has described the far right as the fastest-growing terror threat in the UK, although the majority of attacks and thwarted plots are by jihadis.

    Last month, officials lowered the UK’s terror threat level to substantial, meaning further attacks are deemed likely rather than “highly” likely.

    Priti Patel said the decision was due to the “significant reduction in the momentum of attacks in Europe” since those seen between September and November.

    The decision was taken by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC), which previously lowered the UK terror threat level to substantial in November 2019, weeks before an Islamist extremist murdered two people at a rehabilitation event in London.

    It was followed by three other terror attacks in 2020 – in HMP Whitemoor prison, Streatham and Reading – all carried out by serving or released prisoners.

    They are among 12 such attacks to have taken place in the UK since March 2017 – 10 Islamist and two far-right

  456. “Please will you release the findings of systemic fraud and corruption in Chancery as
    identified by the Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police which lead to a meeting
    with Sir Richard Heaton MP, Secretary of State for Justice”
    Read more:
    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/cy/request/664712/response/1624850/attach/html/3/2020%2008%2019%20IR%20Response.pdf.html

    “Heaton has however given us more insight into the extraordinary catalogue of failures in MoJ in recent years than he thinks. An organisation headed by such a man, a man without the least concept of what leadership entails, a man so disdainful of detail, so unable to take personal responsibility, could never flourish. The MoJ rotted from the top down.

    The story extends to two other serious failures.

    As ever when someone fails in a job by so wide a margin, questions must be asked about those who appointed him – and who kept him in office when it was clear it was quite beyond him: Cabinet Secretaries Jeremy Heywood and Mark Sedwill. Why did Heywood appoint someone so unsuitable by reason of his experience – Heaton was a Government lawyer of no real management experience – and temperament, to a massively difficult management job, £8bn complex spend and a huge variety of services, employing 70,000 or so staff right across the UK?”
    Read more https://www.julianlevay.com/articles/richard-heaton-explains-mojs-failures

    SEE ALSO: https://carroll-foundation-trust.com/fraud/sra-solicitors-regulation-authority-organised-crime-extortion-fraud-bribery-forensics-files-cps-organised-crime-division-criminal-prosecution-files-the-law-society-the-general-council/

    AND: https://carrolltrust.com/hugh-7th-duke-of-westminster-organised-crime-break-ins-seizures-theft-bribery-offences-forensics-files-hrh-prince-william-duke-of-cambridge-the-godfather-story-hm-edward-viii-hrh-princ/

  457. Benjamin Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son)
    Benjamin Oliver is the son of judge Simon Oliver. He currently works as a partner in Field, Seymour, Parkes (FSP) law based in Reading. He specialises in creating wills, inheritance, control of trusts and lasting power of attorneys. Ben Oliver uses his position to launder his father’s criminal money using his speciality in probate law. Ben has also come before his father in court where Simon Oliver was the judge and his son Ben was the lawyer representing one of the parties. This was without disclosing to anyone their relationship so they could maximise the amount of money that they can make. Many people who challenge Simon Oliver’s behavior and his fabricated judgements usually are attacked by FSP law. Ben Oliver targets the litigant in order to destroy them. He liaises with Thames Valley Police to do this as well. Ben has also advised his clients that they have to give 5-figure sums to his firm so that they can pass it on to Simon Oliver and guarantee a favourable judgement. None of these allegations have been defended by Simon Oliver or Ben Oliver. Ben Oliver has also worked as a crown prosecutor to prosecute parents in family law cases in Westminster magistrates court. This was most likely because his father Simon asked him to do it.

    Ben Oliver attended Warwickshire university and gained a first class honours degree in economics. He graduated in 2009. He then attended the Guildford college of law to complete further qualifications in law and eventually gaining an LLM in 2011. He has since worked at FSP law from 2011 until the present day eventually becoming a partner. The reason Ben Oliver did a degree in economics first was because his grades were not good enough to do a law degree as a direct entry from college. He eventually overcame this after he received his economics degree. Since then he has been committing heinous acts of criminal activity as a solicitor whilst being covered up by his father Simon Oliver and and their association with Thames Valley Police which prevents them from being prosecuted.

    https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/30.jpg
    Ben oliver – Simon Oliver’s son Ben Oliver also known as FSP laws one and only ‘deputy child abductor’. Ben works alongside his father Simon also committing vile acts of crimes where he uses his economics degree to advise clients how to bribe judges and launder money.

    Ben Oliver is married to a woman called Kathleen Norton and they both have two children. They live in Basingstoke in a million pound mansion. This has been bought by all the criminal money the father and son team have made from bribes and other criminal activities at the expense of the taxpayer and the public.

    https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/31.jpg?w=840
    Ben Oliver and his wife Kathleen Norton – Simon and Ben Oliver protect their own children (and grandchildren) whilst targeting and abusing other peoples children (and laundering money at the same time). Ben Oliver is a disgrace just like his father. These two products of the Oliver household are now reproducing to continue the crimes they inflict on society upon generation after generation.

    Edward Oliver (Judge Simon Olivers son):
    Edward Oliver is Simon Oliver’s second son. He also works in the legal industry. He’s not a current practising solicitor or barrister and tries to keep away from his father’s bad reputation. He is also married but has no children.

    https://judgesbehavingbadly.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/32.jpg
    Edward Oliver and his wife standing in Simon Olivers back garden – Edward is the second son of Simon Oliver but he is too embarrassed of his fathers behaviour that he chooses to keep a low profile. We are sure he’s also laundering money and bringing harm to society one way or another, it just happens, he’s a closed case.

  458. Hi, I contacted Field Seymour Parkes solicitors so that they can represent me in my family dispute case. I was told by a solicitor called Caroline Brady that Simon Oliver will require £25,000 to guarantee a good case win. Someone called Mr Dixon in the same firm confirmed that this is the correct procedure and always takes place in cash. At the time I did not know that his son Ben was a partner in this firm! Regards

  459. Thank you so much for this. We need a lot more people like you. I hope people with information will come forward.

    In its report, Operation Tiberius, the Metropolitan Police reported on corruption and organised crime having infiltrated every area of public life. This includes police and the “legal system”. There is no doubt that there are judges and lawyers who are operating well-oiled organised crime rings and that the government is too afraid (or involved) to do anything about it. Lord Burnett, Sir Robert Buckland, Sir Andrew McFarlane, and many others who have been named frequently, including successive Lord Chancellors & Secretaries of State for Justice must surely be at the helm. Who is the Mr. Big at the very top? Or is it The Crown, Royal Family, and the Queen herself? These are Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals and they are being used for rampant financial crime, bribery, extortion. Perhaps people would be better taking cases to foreign courts. Bulgarian courts, for example, are known to be completely corrupt and a tool for organised financial crimes to take place in plain site. Perhaps people would have more of a chance for justice than they would in the British courts?

    Make your opinions and truths known to The Westminster Commission – APPG on Miscarriages of Justice https://appgmiscarriagesofjustice.wordpress.com/commission-on-miscarriages-of-justice/ – to your MP, and to journalists, and keep using this site to expose corrupt judges, law firms, and those involved in these organised crime rings.

    The British justice system has deteriorated into a complete shambles. Government departments OFTEN interfere with justice (perhaps for a fee?). Evidence, both in civil and criminal courts, is withheld; perjury by police, criminals with law degrees, social services, officials, etc. is rampant. Someone needs to expose Mr. or Mrs. Big. It goes higher than the Oliver family and does include Freemasons and other organisations, such as the notorius Common Purpose organisation. Does it include the Prime Minister? Does it include foreign powers, such as David Cameron’s Russian donors to his election campaign? It’s about time people realised that a corrupt legal system is perhaps the biggest threat to national security that Britain has ever faced.

    Common Purpose: Question in the House of Lords by Lord Maginnis:

    Common Purpose (CP) – a hidden virus in our government and schools:

    Although it has 80,000 trainees in 36 cities, 18,000 graduate members and
    enormous power, Common Purpose is largely unknown to the general public.

    It recruits and trains “leaders” to be loyal to the directives of Common Purpose
    and the EU, instead of to their own departments, which they then undermine
    or subvert, the NHS being an example.

    Common Purpose is identifying leaders in all levels of our government to
    assume power when our nation is replaced by the European Union, in what
    they call “the post democratic society.” They are learning to rule without
    regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of
    us.

    Common Purpose is also the glue that enables fraud to be committed across
    these government departments to reward pro European local politicians.
    Corrupt deals are enabled that put property or cash into their pockets by
    embezzling public assets.

    It has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal profession, the church,
    many of Britain’s 7,000 quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government
    ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA’s (Regional Development
    Agencies).

    Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised
    the “Shoot to kill” policy without reference to Parliament, the law or the
    British Constitution. Jean de Menezes was one of the innocents who died as
    a result. Her shoot to kill policy still stands today.

    Common Purpose trained Janet Paraskeva, the Law Society’s Chief Executive
    Officer. Surprising numbers of lawyers are CP members. It is no coincidence
    that justice is more expensive, more flawed and more corrupt. And no surprise
    the courts refused to uphold the law, when a challenge was made to the
    signing of the six EU treaties, which illegally abolish Britain’s sovereignty.
    Common Purpose is backed by John Prescott’s “Office of the Deputy Prime
    Minister” (ODPM), and its notional Chief Executive is Julia Middleton.

    The Head of the Civil Service Commission is a member

    It is close to controlling Plymouth City Council, where is has subverted the
    democratic process. Local people cannot get CP’s corrupt activities published,
    because the editors of local papers are in CP, and refuse to let journalists
    publish the articles.

    CP started in 1985; in the 1990’s, with its members’ cross departmental
    influence, it was involved with what then became the disasterous New
    Millennium Dome Company and the squandering of £800 million; it appears
    £300m of this was diverted into the web of quangos set up by CP. There is a
    fraud case over this, stalled in the courts thanks to CP’s influence in the legal
    profession.

    Over £100 million of our money has been spend on CP courses alone, and its
    been hidden from the public, and members names are a guarded secret. It
    charges substantial figures for its courses. Matrix for example costs £3,950 plus
    VAT, and courses for the high flying ‘leader’ can be as much as £9,950 plus VAT.
    This money is ours, paid by government departments financing senior staff to
    become agents for CP, instead of loyal to their own jobs.

    Common Purpose (Ltd by guarantee, No. 2832875) is registered as charity No.
    1023384. It describes itself as being involved in Adult education. Given it preys
    on the rich and powerful, charges expensive fees, and its aims are clearly
    power and control, its charity status stinks and should be revoked.

    Potential Common Purpose subjects are selected for training. Are they
    susceptible to being converted; are they in the right job, with the right
    colleagues and friends? Do they have power, influence and the control of
    money? If the candidate has some, or all of these key attributes, then the local
    Common Purpose Advisory Board decides if they can do the course.

    Common Purpose – training our future EU rulers – continued
    Trained leaders are encouraged to act as a network, enable other members’
    plans, and have meetings under the so called Chatham House rules. This
    effectively means their statements are not attributable to them, nor can
    attendees reveal information heard at a Common Purpose meeting.
    Council Officers are having secret meetings with, for example, property
    developer Common Purpose friends. No agendas and no minutes. Common
    Purpose Graduates from the public quango sectors such as the Regional
    Development Agencies attend, and have the power to award large sums of
    public money to projects.

    It is the worst national example of cronyism, closed contract bids, fraud and
    corruption. And unseen to the general public.

    Common Purpose undermines traditionally effective and efficient government
    departments with an overwhelming influx of new language, political
    correctness and management initiatives. The talk is of empowering
    communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming (sucking EU money into a
    project to sustain it), community empowerment, working partnership,
    regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc. Documents appear about
    change, and reorganisation.

    As CP “leaders” become more senior they employ countless managers and
    bureaucrats. In time confusion rules, and things don’t seem to work properly.
    Management decisions are made that seem stupidly destructive. The
    organisation’s performance becomes sluggish. Undermining the NHS is
    Common Purpose’s biggest success so far, with bureaucrats outnumbering
    hospital staff three to one.

    David Cameron, who is pro Europe, uses the language of Common Purpose; he
    has appointed Ken Clarke, the most committed of the pro Europeans, in charge
    of his “Democracy Taskforce” – rather like putting the cat in charge of the safety
    of mice.

    Common Purpose specifically targets children from the age of 13, and more
    recently younger, for special leadership and citizenship training. Yes, it is
    active in schools, and again the average parent has no idea.

    People have contacted us to speak of their experiences with Common Purpose.
    A common theme is its all sweetness and light, until you fail to follow the
    direction set by the CP leadership.

    Then interesting things happen. Ladies in particular have been bullied at work,
    some have lost their jobs, some have become paranoid and depressed at the
    pressure from people ganging up on them.

    A typical story is a husband describing the decline in his wife from the time she
    becomes a Common Purpose graduate. Loss of sparkle, enthusiasm, anxious
    and ‘changed’, and she initiated a divorce.

    Other Common Purpose people lie when they are challenged as to their
    involvement.

    Common Purpose candidates are given a two day residential course in which
    they are ‘trained’ in a closed residential environment, such as a small hotel.
    They are encouraged to reveal personal information about themselves, such as
    their likes, dislikes, ambitions and dreams. Discussions are then controlled by
    the course leaders. Some participants have likened this to Delphi technique or
    the application of group psychology such as Cognitive Dissonance or
    brainwashing.

    If you suspect Common Purpose is active in your organization, or see a pattern
    of incredibly bad decisions, money being wasted, notice bullying, fraud, or
    threats, note the names of those involved (we’ve tracked down over a
    thousand) and please contact us. And publish the truth about Common
    Purpose as widely as you can.

    Treason, subversion and deceit at work with a Common Purpose to destroy the
    UK and establish the EUsoviet.

    EU funding is used as the fuel to power the set up of EU government in
    countries and as the fuel for fraud and corruption. Once a country and
    businesses ‘suck on’ EU funds they are effectively bought. By this means the EU
    can control businesses, regions and Countries.

    Take a few UK examples. £2m plus of EU structural funds is sunk into
    developing a film studio in Cornwall. After 2 years there is found to be no
    proper studio, no accounts and no funds. Has there been an investigation? Yes
    but with no visible result. The only local organisation with responsibility and
    supposedly accountability for the EU funds is the GOSW. And when challenged
    they hide behind the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, itself the centre for
    all things EU.

    The EU plan has been very simple and very clever. First set up via the traitors
    within UK national government the Regional Development Agencies. These
    were designed to be smooth as silk and sweet as honey – to do all things good
    e.g. regeneration, helping communities, helping business, innovation,
    entrepreneurship etc etc. Next load the honey trap with large amounts of
    money so that people, organisations are attracted to the honey pot. As more
    people are attracted, increase the powers of the RDAs to include planning
    powers and input. Make it compulsory for City Councils, County Councils and
    District Councils to consult them, and then their power increases further. And
    with planning powers they can get their organisational snouts into virtually
    every walk of life.

    Meanwhile ‘bring the government to the people’ by setting up the Regional
    Government Offices – (remembering Regional = EU). The Government Offices
    now get increasing powers to interfere in everything, and especially local and
    strategic planning, because almost nothing gets done, or built without going
    through the planning process. Make consultation with the Government Offices
    compulsory.

    Now the clever bit. In the background the traitors now work to introduce the
    Regional Assemblies. At first un-elected and informal, so as to allay fears and
    ease doubts as to their true purpose. Then the ‘behind the scenes traitors’

    start to work to make them elected using large amounts of UK public money
    and EU funds.

    The process will use anybody it can to sweeten the pill. The church for
    instance. What friendly vicar would help set up a devious political con. You can
    trust us they say. So interesting that the many Bishops, including the then
    Bishop of Exeter, worked so hard to help set up and implement the SW
    Regional Assembly for example.

    Since all of these bodies, that is the Government Offices of the Regions, the
    Regional Assemblies and the Regional Development Agencies are accountable
    to the ODPM, it is quickly evident that the real plan has been to set up a
    parallel EU government structure in UK. Set up by deceit and deception. By
    making sure that these bodies have the ability to use massive amounts of
    funding and staff, they can now start to run amok over our traditional
    democratic structure of local government.

    The EU grants and funding keeps pouring in. Take the £320m of Objective One
    in Cornwall. Nobody really knows where that money was spent, except that it
    was frittered away in remarkably small sums £500,00 and £150,000 here,
    £60,000 there etc etc. By this means, and particularly with minimal proper
    accounting and probity checks, the money reaches back pockets, favoured
    consultants and the dishonest. The breeding ground for fraud and corruption
    has been created, and not surprisingly fraud and corruption begin to run rife.
    With it comes the added nastiness of threats, intimidation and bullying of
    those who hold up their hand and say look this is illegal.——————————-
    ——-
    Question for Cabinet Office
    Common Purpose: Expenditure

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what has been the total sum they have spent
    buying places on Common Purpose courses during each of the last 20 years; and to
    detail exactly (1) how, and (2) where, such expenditure is recorded.
    Asked 13 July 2020

    No centrally held record of expenditure on training or learning is maintained covering
    the entirety of the period specified. Common Purpose is not a provider of training through Civil Service Learning.
    Answered 20 July 2020 By Lord True (Conservative, Life peer

  460. Thank you for your comment.
    Its strange that Simon Oliver and his friends in the High Court said everything on this site was false. The High Court is on borrowed time. So is the taxpayer funded Oliver family.
    Ben Oliver probably used intermediaries to launder cash money to his judge father. This kind of a set up does not require boxes being passed round in court. It could just be done on the dinner table before the hearing. The father and son team are now exposed. Strange that Ben actually works in probate. The same area where Simon Oliver fails in miserably. Even poor Len has his assets seized because of this judicial failure.

  461. I feel sorry for that little Nicklin judge. The poor guy has been forced to protect paedophiles because Oliver is blackmailing him.

  462. Dear All

    We have a new business E-Mail address. If you have any concerns and would like to send information or documents confidentially, please contact us on
    jbb3@protonmail.com. We do not answer all E-Mails but we do read everything. If you require anything published (and edited and then published) which is relevant, please use the above E-Mail address.

    Thank you
    The team at judges behaving badly
    Helping you keep governments open.

  463. Dear All

    It has come to our attention that judge Simon Oliver is attempting to clean up his reputation online linked to bribes at the expense of the taxpayer and by creating forged Court orders. He is using the services of the Government Legal Department to assist him in order to cover up his criminal activity. Several websites have been taken down without notice to the owners. The Oliver eight site has been taken down and a website called http://www.misconductinapublicoffice.weebly.com which was a copy of this blog has also come offline. If you are the owner of the above websites, please can you check your administration settings and see if your subscription is up-to-date and paid for. Alternatively, if you have difficulties keeping your websites up and running, please create a WordPress blog and maintain it through that channel. The WordPress blog is protected by the American first amendment. Furthermore, the Americans are not as resilient in protecting British criminals and paedophiles in the judiciary like Ben Silverstone from Matrix chambers and Louisa Lloyd-Jones from the Government Legal Department do. Let’s not to give the Government Legal Department or the Ministry of Justice the thumbs up for removing correct material off the internet. Please openly and widely distribute that judge Simon Oliver takes bribes (we know he hates this word as its a correct reflection of his work) Keep copying this website and keep spreading the word through social media channels.

    You can reach us at our new E-mail address on
    jbb3@protonmail.com

    Let’s take one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind

    Thank you

    From the team at judges behaving badly

  465. The problem is that it isn’t just the judge who is corrupt and it isn’t just the police who are corrupt. The whole justice system is corrupt. To whom can we appeal? As a veteran who suffers from PTSD and other related illnesses I wrote for help to the MP “Johnny” Mercer, who, in his maiden speech to Parliament, criticised the government for its lack of care in respect of injured veterans. I wrote to him asking for help becausee I had been abused and made homeless by a corrupt divorce court. He promised to help me. But he didn’t, he ignored me and when I sent him letters reminding him of his promise to help me, he sent me a sarcastic email, thanking me for my “wartime service”. I then learned that to shut him up about injured veterans he had been offered a sinecure of 85,000 pounds a year for 4 hours work a week. he then turned his back on the peopler to whom he had pledged to help and support – the injured veterans – and was then rewarded with a ministerial position”looking after” service personnel. He went from being a lowly captain in the army to being a government minister within a few short years, for his dis service and hypocritical behaviour towards those he had promised to help. Johnny Mercers recent fall from grace is an indication of the governments attitude towards truth and justice. The whole system doesn’t care. The system is corrupt. We need to formulate a policy of action, rather than just banging our heads against an intransigent wall of corruption.

  466. I agree with everything you have said. At the same time, you will be hard pressed to find anyone in the political, judicial or legal system, or any minister or Chief Constable, who does not have his or her face in the trough – and don’t discount the possibility that royalty not only benefits, but is fully aware of the corruption. None of these people should be turning their heads away, but they are all there only to serve themselves and not the British people. Furthermore, we have examples of foreign powers taking precedence over both British and International justice in the civil courts – particularly the family courts – due to an unhealthy allegiance between them and the Foreign Office, while McFarlane, Buckland, Burnett and the permanent secretaries in the Ministry of Justice, Foreign Office, Department of Trade and Industry are up to their necks in it. All Prime Ministers, politicians, and judiciary have their strings pulled by corporate and foreign powers while we all sing God Save the Queen and the Archbishop of Canterbury, Uncle Tom Cobbleigh and all are complicit in their silence and ‘Godliness’.

    You are right, and it is the whole system that needs to be wiped out. Maybe the day is not far off when it will happen.

    MPs don’t get paid enough, so it’s a bit like the Royal Family not paying its staff enough, so they sell off the Christmas Puddings that the Queen gives them as Christmas presents, in order to make up the deficit in their wages. Politicans are there, not for the meagre salary, but for the ways in which they can feather their own nests and the business deals they can work for themselves, and we know they have been paid off – not just by lobbyists, but also by Russian ‘Oligarchs’ (previously known as ‘Mafia’). The expenses scandal of some years ago, highlighted by Heather Brooke, the American journalist, is just a drop in the ocean. The whole system is a giant criminal racketeering group with tentacles reaching out around the world, and people are realising that the Emperor is not wearing any clothes.

  467. Why is Boris Johnson being investigated for £58k on a flat refurbishment when cock nose Simon Oliver spent £110k in legal fees in the High Court with no results! At the expense of the taxpayer.

    DEFUND SIMON OLIVER AND THE MOJ

  468. No evidence has been produced that evidenced HHJ Simon Oliver paid £110,000 in legal fees
    The instructions came from the Ministry of Justice to Government Legal Services. The cost is,
    I believe, around £150,000 and increasing.

    Barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones, Government Legal Services, has been busy removing websites
    associated with HHJ Simon Oliver and removing HHJ Simon Oliver from Google Searches.

    Need to look at who has been defending Worshipful Brother HHJ Simon Oliver.

    It is this case Mathews v Matthews 2013 involving HHJ Simon Oliver that has remarkable
    similarities with my own case Lawrence v Lawrence. Both involve the late Sunday Telegraph
    journalist, Christopher Brooker who was silenced by the High Court. The same barrister,
    barristers chambers, and many other similarities, including judicial bullying.

    Barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones, Government Legal Services may care to explain how the
    judgement of Mr Justice Julian Knowles appeared on Matrix Chambers website 12 days
    before Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down his judgement in the Queens Bench Division?

    Leonard Lawrence

  469. Hi Len
    I have been following this website for several years now and I have seen tremendous results from people coming together. Several hundred, possibly thousands of litigants that came before Simon Oliver were accused of forging documents and fabricating allegations during litigations. It has now come to light that it was in fact Simon Oliver who was forging documents. I’ve heard of cases where he has forged court seals and even forged court orders in his own cases and getting other judges to pass them off! Coming to talk about Julian Knowles, I have seen remarkable similarities between Simon Oliver’s wording in his judgements and Julian Knowles judgement as well. The case laws referenced has nothing to do with harassment, media, defamation or any form of liable. It is simply to do with employment law and family case laws which is not relevant in these proceedings. I have a strange feeling that the only conclusion that can be reached on this is that Simon Oliver has been fabricating allegations and forging court orders and then getting other judges to pass them off. Other judges who he possibly is blackmailing. I have even known of many cases which involves Thames valley police trying to collect material for Simon Oliver’s benefit so that litigants drop cases once they are blackmailed by Simon Oliver. If you look at lens case, you will see that Simon Oliver has put in hand written instructions instructing higher courts to dismiss appeals. If a member of the public did something like this, the crown prosecution service and the police would charge them with perverting the course of justice. But because Simon Oliver is a judge, he is allowed to get away with it. When the public complains, the police install a alarm in his house to help protect him!

  470. I’ve heard of cases where Thames valley police have arrested suspects and then they have mysteriously died in custody. Their children are ultimately then lost in the system by being homed by paedophile after paedophile. The judge that is doing it is Simon Oliver. But you can’t go to the police, because you could end up dying in custody or being jailed with false charges. There are some people whose passports have been stopped so they cannot take their children abroad. I go one particular case where the mother was hounded up in Scotland and all the way up in Europe because Simon wanted her children homed with abusers and paedophiles

  471. The politicians do get paid a lot. They donate to ‘foreign charities’ which then disappears regularly. Judges do the same regularly. Another aspect the government is afraid of is the mention of paedophile rings in parliament and the judiciary. This is what they are trying to cover up. With all these allegations, Simon Oliver should of been prosecuted by the Government Legal Department, instead they ignore us and proceed to protect him.

  475. Julian Knowles has gone particularly quite? Guess his clever games were not all that clever after all. He has taken down all his social medias after allegations were launched against him. We haven’t even begun making allegations against him yet. Lets keep in mind he’s a document forgerer and pre writes orders (or is Simon writing them and getting Julian Knowles to officiate them)

  478. THEY SEEK HIM HERE, THEY SEEK HIM THERE ……………….he finally found a job………

    Robinson announces the appointment of a new Warden

    Sir Richard Heaton will take over from Professor David Yates in October 2021
    Heaton was knighted in 2019 in recognition of his public service

    Louis Ashworth/VARSITY

    by Louis Hodgson

    Thursday May 13 2021, 7:42pm

    Robinson College has announced the appointment of a new Warden. Sir Richard Heaton will begin the role in the new academic year, taking over from Professor David Yates, who has been in the role for 20 years.

    As college Warden, he will be responsible for defining Robinson’s “agenda” over the coming years.

    Upon his election, Heaton commented: “I am delighted and humbled to have been elected as [Robinson’s] next and third Warden.”

    He added: “Building on [Robinson’s] proud and relatively short history, it is also clear that Robinson has a limitless future as a modern, academically excellent, inclusive and happy college in the Cambridge tradition.”

    Heaton has had a distinguished career in the civil service, having served in a number of legal and non-legal roles. His career has had a particular focus on justice, the constitution and human rights.

    Heaton was Permanent Secretary at the Cabinet Office and First Parliamentary Counsel (2012-2015), and Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Justice and Clerk of the Crown in Chancery (2015-2020).

    He was also the Civil Service Race Champion for six years (2014-2020), helping to improve access for under-represented groups. In addition, he is involved in charity work and is currently a trustee at Koestler Arts, which encourages prisoners to participate in the arts.

    In 2019, Heaton was knighted in recognition of his public service. He is also a Bencher of the Inner Temple.

    Professor David Yates, the incumbent Warden said: “It has been a great honour, and an enormous pleasure, to lead Robinson for the past 20 years and I am delighted to congratulate Richard on his election as Warden.”

    Professor Melinda Duer, Deputy Warden of Robinson College, stated that Heaton is “exactly what [the College] need” to help widen participation and “make Robinson the gold standard for diversity, inclusion and sustainability.”

    https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/21440

  479. I don’t think Richard Heaton should get such an appointment considering that he was going to south London care homes to abuse young boys. Now he will have open access to them at Robinson college. I was somewhat dumbfounded to see that he had done quite a lot in the civil service? Because I have never seen any of this. Probably just a forged resume just like everything else he did

  480. Saw Ben Oliver and Simon Oliver down at the local Aldi in Newbury. Cheapskates buying from Aldi when hes been taking bribes in the millions. Takes all sorts. Shame on the freemasons for sticking up for this sicko

  481. Operation Tiberius was an official internal Metropolitan Police investigation, commissioned in October 2001, written in 2002, but leaked to The Independent newspaper in 2014. The Metropolitan Police have acknowledged it was born of other investigations, but describe it as a new strategic approach to corruption, rather than a single operation.[1]

    Metropolitan Police Headquarters, London
    The Parliamentary Home Affairs Committee has published a redacted copy of a summary of the investigation, with a lengthy annexe detailing other earlier corruption investigations, especially Operation Russell.[2][3] It investigated the charge that certain “organised criminals” were able to infiltrate Scotland Yard by bribery.[4] 19 former and 42 then serving officers were investigated for alleged corruption.[4] It has been claimed that the Metropolitan Police suffered “endemic corruption” and given the small number of convictions, doubt has been expressed over whether this police force has extirpated the problem.[5]

    The Commissioner has made it absolutely clear that he will not tolerate any corrupt or criminal activity by his staff, and we remain absolutely committed to tackling corruption and those people who seek to corrupt our staff. Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police[1]

    According to The Independent, the gangs used their contacts inside Freemasonry to “recruit corrupted officers”. The report concluded that this was one of “the most difficult aspects of organised crime corruption to proof against”.[6]

    Some of Britain’s most dangerous organised crime syndicates were able to infiltrate New Scotland Yard “at will”. The Independent[4]

    Allegations of evidence tampering, interference with the pursuit of criminal suspects by other forces, and close cooperation between senior police officers and master criminals, particularly those involved in illicit drugs and prostitution, have been raised.[7] Charges that jurors were bought off or threatened to return not-guilty verdicts, corrupt individuals working for HMRC, both in the UK and overseas, and “get out of jail free cards” being bought for £50,000 are also cited in the report.[4]

    I feel that at the current time I cannot carry out an ethical murder investigation without the fear of it being compromised. Unnamed MPS Senior Investigating Officer, currently attached to SO 1(3), cited in the Independent’s report [4]

    John Palmer (‘Goldfinger’) protected by corrupt officers Edit
    One of the highest-ranking gangsters in the UK, John Palmer, was alleged by The Times from Operation Tiberius files, to have been protected from arrest and investigation by a clique of high-ranking corrupt Metropolitan Police officers.[8] Palmer’s companions were once discovered with a silenced Uzi submachine gun and 380 rounds of ammunition.[8]

    Panorama (BBC programme) Edit
    On 29 February 2016, the BBC screened an edition of Panorama entitled “Cops, Criminals, Corruption: The Inside Story”. It covered police corruption, including material uncovered by Operation Tiberius. However, there was no mention of the manner in which contacts were established and maintained between senior police officers and criminals. In particular, there was no mention of the involvement of Freemasonry, in contrast to The Independent article and what had been leaked from the Operation Tiberius report

  483. THEFT OF CHILDREN AND DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY UNIT

    FINALLY! FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH:

    Sir James Munby: Judges use child protection laws to cover up their decisions

    Published 24 May 2021

    Laws intended to protect the privacy of children are being used by judges to cover up decisions in England and Wales, Sir James Munby has said.

    The former president of the High Court’s Family Division said that curbs on media reporting “prevent public officials being held to account”.

    He made the comments when giving evidence to a transparency review of the family court last week.

    Sir James said: “There are cases … where the only person being protected … is the judge.”

    The story of a family whose baby was taken from them for nearly three months only became reportable last week. A radiologist dismissed a diagnosis that the child had suffered possible fractures – the suspicion that had led to separation.

    The judge said reporting rules made it “very, very difficult to get inside what the local authorities are up to”.

    He added: “Practice varies enormously. Some of them are very good, some we know for a fact are appalling.”

    The transparency review’s report is due to be published in July.

    https://www.scottishlegal.com/article/sir-james-munby-judges-use-child-protection-laws-to-cover-up-their-decisions

    PLEASE SHARE WIDELY. ALSO SHARE THE FOLLOWING:

    EXTORTION AND FRAUD BY CHILD MAINTENANCE SERVICES

  484. Hello blog operator
    I would like to tell my story about HHJ Simon Oliver. I was told by my solicitor that I could get my son back from my ex-husband by making a false statement that he had been abusing and being violent to me when he wasn’t. I was told that I would need to give £40,000 as a gift to Simon Oliver and that way you can guarantee that Thames valley police would go and arrest my ex-husband and press charges against him without any evidence. My solicitor said that my ex-husband would be put into so much litigation and would be put on trial that no judge in their right mind would give custody of my son to him. Even if he is found not guilty, he would be unsuitable to be the sole parent in charge. However, it will come at a cost of £40,000. A proportion of this or go to the Thames valley police officer who will press charges against him and the rest will go to Simon. I assume that Simon Oliver has connections in Thames valley police where false charges can be placed on innocent people simply on him saying so. I was shocked to know that murder suspects can be let go with £50,000 given to the right people. I was given instructions by Barrett law and co (for my own case) which are based in Reading.

  487. Ref: AMc/ET Joan Bamford Court of Protection
    Craig Bulman

    2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment

    The Red Devils Freefall Team

    The Blues and Royals – Household Cavalry

    Dear Craig,

    From wikipedia.org

    The Court of Protection

    Journalist Christopher Booker
    Journalist Christopher Booker wrote a series of articles in The Daily Telegraph critical of the Court of Protection, calling it the “most sinister” and “most secretive” court

    in the United Kingdom. Booker reported several cases where elderly Britons were forced to hand over their assets to social workers and the courts. [End Quote].

    Journalist Sue Reid
    Journalist Sue Reid also wrote articles in the Daily Mail about the Court of Protection:

    Secret court in control of a £2billion fortune: It holds the assets of 16,000 vulnerable people – but pays them paltry interest.

    Neil has an IQ of 125 and runs his own business. So why won’t a secret court let him spend his own money?

    Journalist Christopher Brooker was silenced by the High Court Family Division.
    Christopher Brooker had also written about Aerotoxic (Toxic Cabin Air on aircraft) and was aware of what had occurred to me surrounding the Court of Protection.
    Christopher Brooker also wrote about the Matthews v Matthews case, before he was silenced.

    A barrister becomes the judge of her client’s sanity – The … https://www.telegraph.co.uk › comment › A-barrister-b…
    A barrister becomes the judge of her client’s sanity … By Christopher Booker 24 November 2012 • 7:00pm. The child protection system has torn another .

    There are a lot of similarities between my case Lawrence v Lawrence and the case Mathews v Mathews:
    The similarities are:

    Both cases involve His Honour Judge Simon Oliver at Reading County Court.

    1. His Honour Judge Simon Oliver acting outside of his jurisdiction.
    2. The use of the Mental Heath Act to silence Mrs Mathews in her case and use of the Mental Heath Act to silence myself in my case.
    3. Both Mrs Mathews and myself lost our homes.
    4. Malicious investigations by the Department for Works and Pension.
    5. Malicious investigations by the Revenue and Customs.
    6. The failure of senior officers within Thames Valley Police to protect us and so many others.
    7. Both Mrs Matthews and I had the same lay legal adviser (Ty..) who was also silenced.
    8. Both Mrs Matthews and I had involvement with barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers and one other chambers.
    9. Both Mrs Matthews and I had worked for the same employer!

    Craig Bulman deep dive into the secretive Court of Protection
    Craig, as you take the deep dive into the secretive Court of Protection and the £2billion fortune that it holds and the assets of 16,000 vulnerable people
    you can expect turbulence! With around 10,000 homeless male and female veterans, thousands of veterans in prison, and thousands suffering PTSD
    I wonder how many veterans have also had their homes stolen.

    With legal fees being claimed by barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, at £10,000 per hour before HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading
    County Court, and solicitors claiming £2000 per letter, they are not going to surrender this lucrative income easily. All of the judges in my case never
    held a Court of Protection authorisation, including HHJ Simon Oliver, when conducting hearings.

    THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION
    Craig, you need to ask Mr Jamison to provide you with a copy of the Court of Protection order authorising the sale of your aunts home. Examine the
    order and ascertain whether it has: THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE COURT OF PROTECTION. Thereafter, check that the judge held a Court of Protection authorisation.

    Senior Operatives with an association to the Royal Military Police and M.O.D. took less than 30 seconds to observe that not one of the Court of Protection, Medical Certificates,
    that had enabled barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, to hold me for 18 months as a patient subject to the Court of Protection bears the impressed seal
    of the Court of Protection. So why did detectives from the Economic Crime (Major Fraud) Unit, Thames Valley Police and the Serious and Organised Crime Unit,
    Devon and Cornwall Police, failed to observe the missing Court of Protection Seal when they examined my Court of Protection Certificates at my home?

    Leonard Lawrence
    Veteran Royal Navy

    cc Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division and Court of Protection

    Queen’s Bench Division

  488. I am now being bullied by government legal services. Please read the letter I received

  491. Do you want to know something? Simon Olivers daughter-in-law Kathleen Oliver from Bramblys Grange Medical centre is a General Practitioner. She works as a medical doctor. Her GMC number is 7285392. I cant write the address here but they live in RG23

  496. Subject: Not a decent judge to be found

    https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fuk-news%2F2021%2Fjul%2F25%2Four-silence-permits-perpetrators-to-continue-one-womans-fight-to-expose-a-fathers-abuse&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd274261c7b4b4b7c348108d9b82026d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637743270485559710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B7dZZBjBN%2B9HSE6FGm2RjhNAtssRTEK1fR%2Bz6mUznlw%3D&reserved=0

    Claire Devlin molested by her father, Patrick Devlin, who was one of the
    most celebrated judges in the country. Sent this out months ago but not
    sure if it went through.

    Hayden is pro gay – who knew.

    https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.neonrevolt.com%2F2018%2F04%2F25%2Fthe-perverted-justice-of-judge-anthony-hayden-alfiesarmy%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd274261c7b4b4b7c348108d9b82026d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637743270485559710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=HdXfdOcw6u5GVz4MtNKhRm7umUU6vRtwST3Cpyxqimc%3D&reserved=0

    https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fnews%2Fjudge-at-center-of-alfie-evans-case-is-a-pro-gay-activist%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd274261c7b4b4b7c348108d9b82026d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637743270485559710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=M5RLshyq90Ro2tWrrk8INiGe9laIcQkqUULbf7A6ocQ%3D&reserved=0

    And this guy as I’m sure you all know worked at Javid’s hospital and was
    spared jail ‘because he was too talented’ yes you guessed it by a judge
    and a female one at that……

    https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-3710984%2FLeading-heart-surgeon-raped-woman-sexually-assaulted-others.html&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd274261c7b4b4b7c348108d9b82026d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637743270485559710%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=GZuvId6QPd7asjpRWdX8NQQCDhPajqv76UKHdHXoMg8%3D&reserved=0

  497. HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED COURT OF PROTECTION

    From: len lawrence
    Sent: 05 December 2021 14:16
    To: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk
    Cc: pfd.office@judiciary.uk ; mrjustice.hayden@ejudiciary.net
    Subject: HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED COURT OF PROTECTION

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones

    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice,

    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department

    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL
    | DX 123243 Westminster 12
    Email: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,

    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver and the Court of Protection (Barrister’s fee £10,000)

    You allege that your instructions to advance further false allegations against me came from Susanna McGibbon, Treasury Solicitor, HM Procurator General and Permanent Secretary, Government Legal Department, London, England.

    Please advised Ms McGibbon that I have updated my post on JUDGES BEHAVING BADLY-HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER

    With previous assistance from Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC and more recently Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Cox QC MP, both of whom have served
    as Attorney General for England and Wales, (both of whom met me in person) and with assistance from The Independent Police
    Complaints Commission (IPCC) / Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) the truth unfolds:

    As early as 2005 the Crown Prosecution Service had requested Thames Valley Police to visit me. Had Thames Valley Police complied
    with the Crown Prosecution Service requested they would have located many Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, of neurological
    incapacity, some of which were held by the Government Legal Department and not disclosed to the Court of Protection.

    It is not the Court of Protection that is making judgments on extremely vulnerable persons, it is lawyers within the Government Legal
    Department not disclosing a patients protected status to the Court of Protection.

    With legal fees being charges at £10,000 per/hour by barrister Dominic Brazil, 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers, at the Court of Protection
    hearing before HHJ Simon Oliver at Reading County Court, vulnerable persons are a lucrative source of income for some lawyers.

    Especially as it is now known HHJ Simon Oliver did not hold a Court of Protection authorisation in 2012!!

    Leonard Lawrence
    bcc
    From: “JUDGES BEHAVING BADLY – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED”
    Sent: Friday, 25 December 2020
    Subject: [New comment] HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT

    Respond to this comment by replying above this line

    New comment on JUDGES BEHAVING BADLY – HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED

    Leonard Lawrence commented on HHJ SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT.

    in response to HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER – EXPOSED AS TAKING BRIBES IN COURT:

    ——- OPERATION ‘X’——- HIS HONOUR JUDGE SIMON OLIVER INTRODUCING A CRIMINAL IN A ROBE Welcome to this blog which is part of Operation ‘X’. If you have reached here, it must be because a Judge or a lawyer has been up to no good. Well, look no further because we are here to help. Operation […]

    To: Chief Constable John Campbell
    From: Leonard Lawrence

    Chief Constable John Campbell, and Deputy Chief Constable Jason Hogg Five years after the report was written, its findings withheld by Professional Standards Department, Thames Valley Police.

    Detective Inspector Nicholas Watts Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Reading, Berkshire.

    2016 Thames Valley Police internal review:

    Subject: Leonard Lawrence

    “While his divorce is going through the courts with BP Collins (Solicitors) acting for his wife, they apply for a sectioning order against him based on a later proven misdiagnosis that he is bipolar and hyper manic”.

    “BP Collins then fail to notify the County Court that Mr Lawrence is subject to a Part V11 order and is therefore under the Court of Protection”.

  499. Subject: Re: England’s Political Hospital

    Louisa Lloyd-Jones

    Senior Lawyer | Ministry of Justice,

    Justice and Development Division |Litigation Group| Government Legal Department

    102 Petty France, Westminster | London SW1H 9GL

    | DX 123243 Westminster 12

    Email: louisa.lloyd-jones@governmentlegal.gov.uk

    Louisa,

    Rather than continual to advance further false allegations against me, kindly forward this email to the person from whom you identified that you are

    receiving your instructions from: Ms Susanna McGibbon

    Ms Susanna McGibbon Treasury Solicitor, HM Procurator General and Permanent Secretary, Government Legal Department, London, England, United Kingdom

    Ms Susanna McGibbon Director General Legal of the Department for Works and Pensions

    Ms McGibbon
    Whistle-blower’s pay a high price both here in the United Kingdom, and in the United States (Capt. Dan Hanley ex-USN and Capt. Field McConnell ex-USMC)

    Four weeks after the Berkshire Freemason, The Most Worshipful Brother, His Honour judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court, England, UK was directed by
    Mrs Justice Pauffley to re-transfer my case to the Civil Court of Appeal, London, England, I was falsely accused by the Department for Works and Pensions of
    pension fraud and fine £8825.24 with no right of appeal! My Legal Aid Certificate was also removed and my barrister from St Philips Chambers, Birmingham,
    withdrew from my case, according to Simpson Millar Solicitors, following a telephone call from Worshipful Master, His Honour Judge Simon Oliver.

    At the same time, I became subjected to a Revenue and Customs Investigation, Police investigation, and experienced difficulties with other bodies.
    On the 24 September 2013, the Department for Works and Pensions telephoned me admitting that the allegation of pension fraud against me was malicious.
    I had disclosed my pension!

    Two Managers from Department for Works and Pensions (DWP) appealed on my behalf, all monies taken from me were later return. The DWP Managers advised
    me that the instructions to leave me without monies to buy food for almost 6 months came from the very top of the Department for Works and Pensions.

    Ms Susanna McGibbon Director General Legal of the Department for Works and Pensions from whom are you receiving your instructions?

    Ms McGibbon
    Following the latest false allegation by barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones, that I had contacted HHJ Simon Oliver’s family, (? Dr Kathryn Oliver) I was invited to meet
    former colleagues and veterans at a PTSD camp. Also present was Joseph and Bobby, both of whom had served with the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC).
    The RUC was the police force in Northern Ireland from 1922 to 2001.

    Joseph, who had severed in the Royal Ulster Constabulary E Department (RUC Special Branch) placed a rubber band on my left wrist. When doing so the

    following words were said “Come for one come for all” I have provided a link to Joseph and Bobby below, for barrister Louisa Lloyd-Jones PERUSAL .

    Ms McGibbon, in your role as Director General Legal of the Department for Works and Pensions I believe that you could assist former and serving members
    of Her Majesties Armed Forces on the subjects or suicides, over one thousand to be specific. Craig (ex- Household Cavalry and Parachute Regiment) bcc
    has a specific interest in veterans suicides and the Court of Protection. I believe that he will be contacting you shortly for assistance with DWP disclosures.

    Leonard Lawrence

  500. This man was responsible for having my son beaten up by Thames Valley Police officers in his own home because they were looking for another suspect whom Simon Oliver wanted to know the wearabouts of. My son suffered broken ribs, a concussion and some memory loss. When we complained, Thames Valley Police said there is no camera footage because the cameras battery ran out. TVP is a organized criminal gang who regularly break the law themselves.

  501. I don’t really follow a lot of what goes on in The Royal Family so, forgive me if this is wrong, but have they refused to pay for security to protect Harry and his family, but will spend millions protecting a nonce???

  502. Regardind HHJ David James Stewart Worster of the Birmingham Mercantile Court saw fit to issue a restraining order against me on 29 Nov 2021. What was my crime? Issuing a Notice to Admit Facts against Deutsche Bank that would force it to disclose that it laundered money to Oleg Deripaska (now confirmed by Fincen disclosures). Deripaska laundered money to his friend Michael Cherney through the Court of Appeal (case Cherney vs Deripaska), in which Baron Thomas sat as President of the Queen’s Bench. Thomas went on to get his successor, Sir Ian Duncan Burnett, to strike out my appeal against DB in which I alleged gold price manipulation (now entirely proven). The evidence implied DB’s bullion audits were fake and this would have to be true for DB to launder money to the Russian Mafia. Thomas was protecting his own reputation – he and his successor have laundered money for Deripaska. My court EML with evidence bundle is attached.

  503. Simon Olivers barrister Ben Silverstone secret behind the scenes advisor Hugh Tomlinson from Matrix chambers has hit headlines. Apparently he has been using the Russians and their money to extort and harass and intimidate litigants. Sounds just about right. Was mentioned in parliament by an MP

    Check this out

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10566881/Amoral-lawyers-helped-Kremlin-cronies-undermine-UKs-legal-MP-says.html?ito=email_share_article-top

  504. Lord Justice Andrew McFarlane
    President of The Court of Protection

    From Leonard Lawrence

    On Wednesday 30 March 2022 I was arrested at home by four
    police officers from Avon and Somerset Police. I am told that
    the instructions came from Detective Constable Yana Glover,
    Hampshire Police.

    My computer was seized, my mobile phone was seized, and I
    was taken under arrest to Bridgewater Police Station.

    Avon and Somerset Police now hold copies of multiple Court of Protection, Medical Certificates, that WBro HHJ Simon Oliver
    never disclosed to the the Court of Protection and Court of Appeal

    The most serious of the 15-allegations made against me was that I have threatened to carry out an Anthrax attack.

    The police identified those that made these false allegations
    against me as:

    Solicitor Ben Oliver (FSD Law Reading) HHJ Oliver’s son.
    Dr Kathleen Oliver, HHJ Oliver’s daughter in law

    The early stage of my arrest by Avon and Somerset Police was
    not pleasant and I was denied access to a police doctor!

    Three weeks later and I am without my phone and computer.

    Avon and Somerset Police have my email account details

    Regards
    Leonard Lawrence

  505. To: Chief Constable Sarah Crew, Avon and Somerset Police
    Deputy Chief Constable Nikki Watson, Avon and Somerset Police

    From: Leonard Lawrence
    Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (amended) United Kingdom

    I WAS RECENTLY ARRESTED BY AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE.
    MY COMPUTER SEIZED
    MY MOBILE PHONE SEIZED
    HELD IN AN AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE CELL.
    NOT ALLOWED TO SPEAK TO MY SOLICITOR BY PHONE.
    DENIED ACCESS TO A MEDICAL DOCTOR.
    INSTEAD, I FOUND MYSELF FIGHTING FOR MY FREEDOM IN A POLICE CELL, AT BRIDGEWATER POLICE STATION, WITH THREE MENTAL HEALTH WORKERS FROM SOMERSET PARTNERSHIP
    NHS FOUNDATION TRUST, SUBJECTING ME TO A MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT.

    THEY WERE BULLYING ME TO AGREE TO RELEASE MY MEDICAL RECORDS TO THEM, AND TO AGREE TO SEE A PSYCHIATRIST.

    THE ABOVE INCIDENT OCCURED SHORTLY AFTER AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE ASKED ME TO IDENTIFY THE NAMES OF THE POLICE OFFICERS THAT HAD OBSTRUCTED ME IN 2013/14​ FROM RECOVERING MY COURT OF PROTECTION, MEDICAL CERTIFICATES, FROM SIMPSON MILLAR LLP SOLICITORS, BRISTOL.

    l WILL START WITH THIS NAME:
    CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT CLAIRE ARMES,
    NOW THE HEAD OF OPERATIONAL SUPPORT,
    AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE.

    CLAIRE ARMES INVOLVEMENT WITH MY CASE HAS ALREADY
    BEEN REVIEWED, ENDING WITH AN ADMISSION BY HER FORMER
    EMPLOYER, DEVON AND CORNWALL POLICE THAT THE ENTRY ON THE POLICE LOG IS FALSE. THE OFFICER NEVER ATTENDED MY HOME!!!!!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 64 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

%d bloggers like this: